ML20238A554
| ML20238A554 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 08/26/1987 |
| From: | Ronald Bellamy NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Wenzinger E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8708310124 | |
| Download: ML20238A554 (4) | |
Text
.
AUG 2 61987 i
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Edward Wenzinger, Chief, Projects Branch No. 3 FROM:
Ronald Bellamy, Chief. EP&RPB, DRSS
SUBJECT:
'Q i,.i Attached for your information is the SALP input relating to Emergency '
Preparedness at the Seabrook Nuclear Power Station for the SALP period-3
- April 1,1986 through July 31, 1987...
e origi$al Signed BY:
Ronald R. Bellamy, Chief 4
Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection _ Branch s
Attachment:
As stated cc w/ attachment:
T. Martin W. Kane S. Collins T.C. Elsasser f
W. Lazarus r'
J. Schumacher j
C. Conklin
(
)
i W. Thomas 11 A. Cerne SALP File j
i t'
0700310124 870026' gDR ADOCK 0 % y3
-\\
CFFICIAL RECORD COPY h
i 1
2 AUG 2 6 1987
- 5 I
4 i
)
.\\
i t
l l
i l
i
),
i l
l l,
6
/
V RI:DRSS RI:
S>
R R
RUS RI:DRSS Thomas /p Sct her Conklin
'Y rus Bellamy 8/248[ C' %
8/rV/87.,
8//f/87 S/gp87 8/t,4/87 f
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY epsea 8/20/87 T
.-~
n SEABROOK NUCLEAR POWER STATION SALP INPUT Period April 1,1986 through July 31, 1987 Emergency Preparedness 1.
Analysis During the previous assessment period licensee performance in this area was rated as Category P (improving), based upon performance during the NT0L Emergency Preparedness Implementation Appraisal and the first full-participation emergency preparedness exercise.
During the current assessment period, two NT0L appraisal followup inspections, one routine safety inspection, and one special safety inspection were conducted, in addition changes to the Emergency Plan and Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures were reviewed.
The two NT0L Appraisal followup inspections were performed in March and June, 1986, specifically to followup on twenty four open items resulting from the appraisal. Actions by ti,2 licensee have been sufficient to close twenty two open items, the remaining two open items are required to be corrected prior to issuance of a full power license. The routine I
safety inspection which was conducted in March, 1987, related to I
inspection of the training program, operational status of the emergency preparedness program, and security / emergency preparedness program interface.
The special safety inspection which was conducted in February,1987, related to followup of the circumstances relating to the classification and notifications of an unusual event on February 11, 1987. This special safety inspection resulted in the issuance of a Notice of Violation.
The licensee failed to follow the requirements of emergency procedure ER 1.0, " Classification and Notification of Emergencies at Zero Power",
which requires notification of both Massachusetts and New Hampshire within 15 minutes of classifying any emergency condition (as defined in procedure ER 1.1).
The causes of the violation were related to weaknesses in training for Shift Supervisors and in procedures.
The emergency preparedr.ess planning function continues to be controlled by NHY corporate staff located at the plant site.
Close liaison continues to be maintained with the site organization. During this assessment period the position of director of emergency planning was filled by a permanent NHY employee and an additional corporate planner has been assigned from Yankee.
Qaj
'i<
1 1
- 4 a
e 1
(.,
x I I.
g
(
Instalistion of equipment and training of personnel to fulfill their emergency responle organization functions is ongoing, but has been 4
substantially completed. A full time nurse has been added to the staff and additional personnel to fill the key emergency response organization 4
y f,
positions on a twenty four hour basis are undergoing qualification. The l
lack of on-shift dose assessment capability has been corrected and lr addition of iodine Termination for off.ite dose estimation has been l*s '
completed.
}
The licensee has been responsive to NRC initiatives as evidenced by the in addition and training of personnel to fill key functions within the emergency response organization, and there continues to be excellent 1
" cooperation between NHY and the NRC on the resolution of issues cnncerning the edrgency plaroahd yirocedares,
.2.
Conclusion i
Rating: Category 2, Consistent.
^
i s
3 6
~, s
\\.
N.,
'(
A h
5 i
't -
p V4 g
n Y
b
'>ng 1
me
_