ML20237L702

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Applicant Exhibit A-15C,consisting of 861202 Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise Observations & Evaluations Re Staging Area Module on Bus
ML20237L702
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 05/18/1987
From:
ABB IMPELL CORP. (FORMERLY IMPELL CORP.)
To:
References
OL-5-A-015C, OL-5-A-15C, NUDOCS 8708280215
Download: ML20237L702 (10)


Text

i rtco &<

6<hibit

\\ Cc.

3D - 3 2 2

  • N ~b y 7- -

c u.c f)-/5d.

87 als 20 e6:co RADIOLOGICAL EERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE OBSERVATIONS AND EVALUATIONS STAGING AREA MODULE BUS OBSERVER DATA Facility:

St Vf/l/kh Srd //il4A T4 0 A

/1?b Date:

i Specific Assignment:

78 M 4'Fe8 4 T* M v467/l Team Leader:

l Name:

Organization:

4/W 4

  • /,F '

T1tiet SA~ I! ' N SW #

1 Business tddress.

Business Phone:

l 8708280215 070518 PDR ADOCK CtOOO322 C

PDR

M IG RtCUul0Rf C0unts$lgt!

bWil A bS ~3U -hi0ffwid (sh. no.

l f~

lensu d h gh & h rb u %k~-Llad n 544___ __ =.

_ 10tMitFitD A&E l31


. _ _ t!C11YED f

h WFMW cr _ _ _.__ __stitttto l

f Mi Mi ____.__

3 $1

%e_

__ ent

._=. _ _ _ _

_mem 0*"

(yg!E _

_@d, W D.DL_h I

\\

f i

l

INSTRUCTIONS Introduction

~

This fom is intended as a tool for the observer to use in observing and evaluating an exercise.

There are several different " modules" corresponding to different observer assignments; an observer assigned to the EOC should have the "EOC Module", an observer assigned to the Emergency News Center should have the " Emergency News Center Module", and so on.

The module you have should correspond to your assignment.

You should bring the form along with you when you go to cbserve. The questions in it will serve as a useful guide concerning what to look for.

You may wish to fill out some or all of the questions while on location.

NOTE: Some responses may already be marked as N/A because the activity is rated under another part of the response organization.

Directly below is a short explar:ation of what is in the form and how to fill it out; please read this explanation as soon as possible.

Concept of Form and Instructions for Use (1) Structure and Format.

Each module is composed of several sections.

Each section is about a particular part of the emergency activities - for example, "eguipment,"

" communications," or " dose assessment.

Each section has two parts.

The first part is a series cf questions for you to rate the perfomance. The second part is a summary section, with space to write a narrative essay summarizing your overall impressions.

(2)

Rating Questions.

You have four options when answering these questions:

Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, N/A, and N/0.

" Satisfactory" means that personnel and equipment performed o

at an acceptable level.

Errors noted were not severe and the task was completed in an acceptable manner.

For example, if personnel are to check their dosimeters once every 15 minutes, but the person you are observing checks his do31 meter only 7 of the 8 times he should in 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, his performance is satisfactory.

However, your narrative sumary should explain the rating.

o

" Unsatisfactory" means that personnel and equipment generally performed below an acceptable level.

There were deficiencies of a significant nature.

The area's ability to carry out its function was significantly impaired.

d q

  • M

,e

  • .'<g J

,},

o "N/A" stands for "not applicable." For example, if the personnel observed did not have dosimeters, then the question, "were their dosimeters properly zerced or checked?

should be "not applicable".

In some cases, a whole section may be not applicable.

For example, if you will be observing a local EOC, most likely the section (in your E0C module) on " Media Relations" will not be applicable, since media reittions are conducted at another facility, o

"N/0" stand for "not observed"; meaning you do not know or cannot judge whether the activity was doae properly.

If something should have been done (or should have been there) but wasn't, then you should mark " unsatisfactory".

(3) Short answer questions.

These are generally self-explanatory.

Most are Informational, asking you to list the participants at your location, or to describe a certain procedure observed, etc.

Some call for you to record a specific event, e.g. who made a certain phone call, or when someone arrived.

Se alert for these events.

(4) Summary.

On the summary page, you should write a brief essay (one paragraph to one page) to describe and evaluate the activities and resources covered by that section.

Describe the resources available and what occurred, in your own words.

You should cover the main pointe rf.ised in the rating and short answer questions, and any other observations you consider l

reicvant; explanations of " Satisfactory" or " Unsatisfactory" y

answers are also appropriate and are encouraged.

Miscellaneous Notes (1) The front cover of the critique fom has blank lines for you to write your ncme, assignment, etc.

l (2) Please do not use blue ink - it does not photo-copy.

Please note: The observations and judgements recorded on this form will be the basis for future reports and decisions.

Be thorough and clear; this will avoid the necessity of contacting you later for clarification.

I 1

1 l

l

1 STAGING AREA MODULE Bus I.

Transportation Operations Sat Unsat N/A N/0 l

1.

Did the bus dispatcher in general, r

display adequate training and f

knowledge to perform effectively?

z 2.

Was there sufficient quantities of equipment (maps, packets,-etc. )

available for personnel being sent

[

into the field?

3.

Were traffic related personnel being sent into the field briefed as to:

P' protective action?

potential plume path and k'

radioactivity levels?

their particular assignment?

r l

I

( -

Stmanary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.

Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.

Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnance.

l.

o VEII Ai.'

PEFFo#N Ai ef WAS doon. nle ' bus 4s s pATe d E2 d

k dGvJ Ex AcTty ? Fops (L pflo c apsIZE (opxP. J.6.4 ) A+ro een"*r'y x,., e 'a>-+ '~75o

'T 2.

nla vis 7>sspicde A decm A wlL<v rer/4 - tml T>te Th~ssIt

Pot ar 62 -ottr>ir.wro p.s ro b rLA w Tie'#-Ac> F-.4 t.t.f TAAr

&eitTAsa ' bas *zuaf 5. da Ar su h

o F 71 k Le g.o up n.u Fatt.

er. eta, arm,Ar wd,- sus wouAs

,>aer<c,pr,ac

,o re to e Fr),rs A Tv/Z.5 A/2s Ao 7 A LL f ' AAC.iVE, x1gAN5 fag 7o swF n 4 's - r~ ~ ad. r~s TI A L Aup por nN E-oF-M s d i. ow nk van nF 's Jc Sston YGRt Ft ckD oM f.o vco falae g. Aa o-perz 1,as

  • btLt JEL5 wet L 34 4&Hi~ ouT ou TAstG Mo % Ae % TE'h+5tGHettais.

3

%G Wh6 h L.1TTLE C:oH FJ 6scM AMoMG TQ2 306 02sMGit5 e la s M c:> TIlW

'?A(LDcoPxtiH6 In nk ilo Arp Rou.y-4eng

%y / lao AL4AoY poaa A Fo ArI It.Au.y 4 oTV'r/L5 c l^ i> t m>

%y, jar, woT was A i2c At> EAtty w

>>serra% or-we o.as

>ru vez s wear veey au.

AFTF/t. DIE Eo c W S (o-oR,>#pA'ioR. /r A VE JuGT/Co cDoNS - BEG os f W tl. VJ;flLl f.cHTfk LL9S Yd. SSII r

5-A u-Fokas "'Ke

%rkT#r> PacFea t y ( 20c/ ST' AR4

\\

,,sFTea-c w w m usut o,4rm u c % pe w

'T>Ars4, T,st, Loc. ? bu f p AvcA s pAye ( Eagt, h.

s. s rxs,-my nm> nurrie a Ave reque z~s+moa

,2,,,via,mts a:,a.nery na s, rvv unce, ga uu,~c 7s p r p m rc s~w 4 ria iran ao no sPAwkp, tre -

1

  • 2F1CtCHC1C 6 9

c,V4/LAu.,THtAE La~Ik Q 4_

II.

Dosimetry and Exposure Control Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.

Was dosimetry issued to all per-

/

I i

sonnel dispatched into the EPZ?

2.

Were dosimetry records properly f

completed?

3.

Were personnel exposures periodically checked?

N/A

/

4.

Were personnel exposures ' tracked?

5.

Were personnel dispatched into the

/

EPZ given thyroid blocking agents?

6.

Were they instructed in its use?

e l

1 s-

l Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.

Put the facts recortied in the questions in perspective.

~

Explain both deficiencies and good performance.

l. ogs&ha. ^'PalLFofM AHce la M 5x costorMT. T1$a > $tMcT99 2

~jas cog.o (1xfcI? idatas % bc q "pfoys)r-f/sccpu M.

2.Tibi % +tMETAf k c p.o p x f> e /?. d g u, A 5g, ppna s gp &

e ws disprc4 %

ivi m A u. k s dro vstt s wo evt.4mo Tils yes.u)wsw 4.'

A W Ar> jovF. bo f/M.r rrA s Ar i s. nius ps wr=g vA c3 s. n n,m s s up~n w n raa o -u.at w,n e ra.,

teForn ks > > % P FT*c ir<K f ~/4>6 o~SS % S o HE ru ll.

C.

AT A V5kosa6 oF 5. S A, w MM Sus %s SpATclkA Ts @s'Msr war 4/t usrM_rw 4 Agm4 w si br ave r>

A7 A h ADi G cP 5,o K, IF NoT Avd!Lt Jto To (Zdes Vs 4 toci w w se, u p r w w e smo,=.

3. "WY. ~% % M G h 4)h') WGGfidl NANDET> CUT- % Soma k

A u. Foll.M 5 W b)s DNVWLs tw n4s %J5 "),sp Arctl %

mig 'P/lo cah.J M dst Do W e) whit 19 4 r1 H E A w r:>

bg>zD sTED Do48HC% Tb 505 4 4V34.5.

w,e.cwess.

4

.v,gsa, w ge mece a e

~. - - _- _ __ - _

l III.

Communications Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.

Were radio communications easily f-y understood, i.e., no static?

2.

Was there too much communication

~

traffic on the radio frequency?

3.

In generr.1, were connunciations v

clear and understandable?

/

6 4.

Were messages written down?

5.

Were they retained for future

/

reference?

\\

6.

Were any communications problems

/

l 7

l rectified?

i l

l 1

1 1

l l

1 l

i 6 l

Sunnary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.

Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.

Explain both deficiencies and good perforinance.

2 6mwm &

T/S fa *f7w hh 3rw4 h uifv/ 4c> Af WW'A -

& x y;L w - f s. w l

1 I

i l

l l

l I

i 1

1-e