ML20237L315
| ML20237L315 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/18/1987 |
| From: | AIDIKOFF ASSOCIATES, INC. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-5-A-013P, OL-5-A-13P, NUDOCS 8708280046 | |
| Download: ML20237L315 (15) | |
Text
'
LELCo Ex Exhk.t I3 p Jo - 3 2. z -oes
%/
/f 7
/F h-/d ?
'87 C 20 PS :13 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE OBSERVATIONS AND EVALUATIONS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (E0C) MODULE SPECIAL EVACUATIONS l
\\
OBSERVER DATA Facility:
DC___.
$\\n\\?:>b Date:
N h CS'h\\ kNE>AXN
'D%
\\
Q Specific Assignment:
Team Leader:
Name:
l Organization:
hxhsh kOcc \\
hws
\\ _ ve Business Ad ss:
i Business Phone:
8708280046 870518 DR ADOCK 050 2
u
AUCLUR REGUUm)tf CDMIIS$104 Qp 50-huaL-s~ g, g knet gg DrEh A" Vud E my 04 t rD. A d -k di \\\\
la tse matter of Wf
. IDENTFilD
/
RECEIVED Applicant ElllCTED faternnot Cont's Off Contractt, DATI J~
~
wita.m Other
__._.. Q _ __$_
-__,-.s-A nJ J ik bN
&Ater
\\
i i
l 1
{
INSTRUCTIONS Introduction This form is intended as a tool for the observer to use in observing and j
evaluating an exercise.
There are several different " modules" corresponding to different observer assignments; an observer assigned to i
the EOC should have the "EOC Module", an observer assigned to the Emergency
(
News Center should have the " Emergency News Center Module", and so on.
The module you have should correspond to your assignment.
You should bring the fom along with you when you go to observe.
The questions in it will serve as a useful guide concerning what to look for.
You may wish to fill out some or all of the questions while on location.
NOTE: Some responses may already be marked as N/A '__cause the activity is j
rated under another part of the response organization.
Directly below is a short explanation of what is in the form and how to fill it out; please read this explanation as soon as possible.
Concept of Form and Instructions for Use (1)
Structure and Fomat.
Each module is composed of several secti ons.
Each section is about a particular part of the emergency activities - for example, " equipment,"
"canmunications," or " dose assessment." Each section has two i
parts.
The first part is a series of questions for you to rate l
the performance.
The second part is a summary section, with space to write a narrative essay summarizing your overall impressions.
(2)
Rating Questions.
You have four options when answering these questions:
Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, N/A, and N/0.
o
" Satisfactory" means that personnel and equipment performed at an acceptable level.
Errors noted were not severe and the task was completed in an acceptable manner.
For example, if personnel are to check their dosimeters once l
every 15 minutes, but the person you are observing checks I
his dosimettr only 7 of the 8 times he should in 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, his perfomance is satisfactory.
However, your narrative sumary shnid explain the rating.
l o
"Unsatisfattery" means that personnel and equipment l
generally perfomed below an acceptable level.
There were deficiencies of a significant nature.
The area's ability to carry out its function was significantly impaired.
l
{
l o
"N/A" stands for "not applicable."
For example, if the personnel observed did not have dosimeters, then the question, "were their dosimeters properly zerced or checked?
should be "not applicable".
In some cases, a whole section may be not applicable.
For example, if you will be observing a local EOC, most likely the section (in your EOC module) on " Media Relations" will not be applicable, since media relations are conducted at another facility, o
"N/0" stand for "not observed"; meaning you do not know or cannot judge whether the activity was done properly.
If something should have been done (or should have been there) but wasn't, then you should mark " unsatisfactory".
(3)
Short answer questions.
These are generally self-explanatory.
Most are informational, asking you to list the participants at your location, _or to describe a certain procedure observed, etc.
Some call for you to record a specific event, e.g. who made a certain phone call, or when someone arrived.
Be alert for these events.
(4)
Susamary.
On the summary page, you should write a brief essay tone paragraph to one page) to describe and evaluate the activities and resources covered by that section.
Describe the resources available and what occurred, in your own words.
You should cover the main points raised in the rating and short answer questions, and any other observations you consider relevant; explanations of " Satisfactory" or " Unsatisfactory" answers are also appropriate and are enceuraged.
Miscellaneous Notes (1) The front cover of the critique fom has blank lines for you to write your name, assignment, etc.
l (2)
Please do not use blue ink - 1t does not photo-copy.
Please note: The observations and judgements recorded on this fom will be the basis for future reports and decisions.
Be thorough and clear; this will avoid the necessity of contacting you later for clarification.
)
I.
Evacuation Operations Management Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was an individual effecitvely in l
charge?
2.
If so name this individual.
l 3.
Was the person in charge the person so designated in the plan?
4.
Were periodic briefings held, to update staff on the situation?
5.
Were staff (as appropriate) involved in decisionmaking?
l 6.
Was a copy of the plan available for reference?
7.
Did staff have written procedures or checklists for reference?
8.
Were message logs kept?
9.
Were :uessages reproduced and dis-tributed, if appropriate?
10.
If so, was message handling efficient?
- 11. Was access to the EOC controlled?
N/A
- 12. When was the EOC notified on the following events (as applicable)?
- Pl ant at " Alert" status N/A
- Plant at " Site Area Emergency" status N/A
- Plant at " General Emergency" status N/A
- 13. When were the fo11cwing protective action orders issued (or received)?
- Take shelter N/A
- Evacuate N/A Sat Unsat N/A N/0 14.
If appropriate, were actions taken to coordinate emergency activiites, such as (indicate time, or write "No,"
"N/A," or "N/0"):
- Call placed to activate radiological monitoring teams?
N/A
- Call p!:ced to activate relocation N/A center?
- 15. Was Federal assistance requested?
N/A 16.
If so, indicate who requested it N/A and what they asked for:
l
(
I l
1 l
i 1
Susunary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activt ties, capabilities and resources, 'or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnances.
l 4
1 - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
II.
Protective Action A.
Evacuation and Access Control Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was activation of traffic control points promptly ordered?
N/A 2.
Were estimates of expected traffic volume discussed?
N/A 3.
According to EOC staff, are appro-priate resources available to keep 1
evacuation routes clear:
- During bad weather?
N/A
- In event of stalled or wrecked cars?
N/A l
4.
Were these resoun:es activated for the exan:ise?
l S.
Were appropriate actions ordered to control all types of access to the contaminated area:
- All roads blocked?
N/A
- NF traffic rerouted?
T/K-
- Water traffic stopped?
T/A-
- Rail traffic stopped?
TTI~
6.
According to EOC staff, are local resources adequate to cover all traffic and access control functions simultaneously:
- In terms of available personnel?
N/A
- In terms of available vehicles?
W
- If not, was help promptly requested?
N/A 7.
Were relocation centers ordered to be activated in a timely f ashion:
N/A i
- E_
B.
Special Evacuation Problems Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was evacuation of onsite individuals demonstrated?
N/A 2.
If so was it:
- Promptly activated?
N/A
- Well organized?
N/A 3.
Were the E0C staff aware of the-location of mobility-impaired indi-l viduals in the area (whether insti-
~
i tutionalized or at home)?
4.
Was this information in written form?
v/
5.
Were EOC sta."i aware of the particular special needs of mobility-impaired residents?
6.
Was this information in written form?
v/
7.
Were arrangements made for transpor-tation of mobility-impaired persons?
I 8.
If school children are to be >Jvacu-ated by bus:
- According to participants, are enough buses and drivers available to cover the schools in the plume EPZ?
N/A
- How are drivers contacted?
l
- Was contact of drivers demonstrated?
N/A
~
- Was an EBS message prepared to inform parents as to where children were being taken?
N/A 9.
(Whether or nnt schoolchildren are to be evacuated by bus) were arrangements made to deal with possible traffic l
jams (of parents) at the schools?
N/A l.
C.
Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Protective ktions Sat-Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was current infonnation available on the location of:
N/A
- Dairy farms?
W
- Food processing plants?
- Water supply intake points?
W 2.
Were there detailed maps available showing crop information?
N/A 3.
itiat recommendations were made re-N/A garding ingestion pathway protective actions, and what were they based on?
l l
1 1
4.
kcording to EOC staff, is there a body of trained staff to work individually with fanners, food-workers, water utilities, and so on to implement protective actions?
N/A 4
e a l
L.
S48 mary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good performances.
NM bh M
\\, hk wh A
Ltmuh k 2
s a a-a e
~9-
III.
Radiological Exposure Control Answer the following questions only if this E0C is in the plume (10-mile) EPI, or if dosimetry was distributed to field workers from this EOC.
Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was the following dosimetry equipment available:
(Direct-Read Dosimeters)
- Low range (0-200 mR)?
- Mid range (0-20 R)?
- trigh range (0-200 R)?
- Cherger for the dosimeters?
- Record keeping cards?
- Permanent record dosimeters, as film badges or TLD's?
\\
f 2.
Was the supply of dosimeters adequate:
3.
Were appropriate instructions issued
.along with the dosimeters 7 4.
Was an adequate supply of potassium iodide (KI) available?
j
~
5.
Was someone there aware of proper procedures concerning its use?
j 6.
Was someone there aware of the maximum dose allowed without authorization?
7.
Was someone there aware of decontam-ination procedures (i.e., when and where to go for decontamination)?
8.
If the EOC was in the plume, were measures taken to protect the E0C personnel against exposure (e.g.,
closing down ventilation)? - _ _______ ____ - __ ____ ______ ________
m Summary l
In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good performances.
l l
9 1
l l _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - -.
__-----____________--______J
IV.
Recovery and Re-Entry Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
If evacuation was ordered:
- Were arrangements made to secure l
the evacuated areas?
N/A
~
- Were policy / procedures developed on allowing entry to evacuated areas for essential services (e.g.,
to milk dairy cows)?
N/A i
l l
2.
Was relaxation of protective actions based on monitor data indicating safe levels of radioactivity?
N/A 3.
Were re-entry / recovery decisions casununicated promptly to all response organizations?
4.
Were arrangements made to provide the public with inforination on:
- Safety precautions during recovery?
N/A
- Possible health effects of low level exposure?
N/A
~
- Availability of compensation for financial losses sustained?
N/A l
j i
l l
l,
l
.s Susanary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resoun:es, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the questions.in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good perfonsances.
9 e
e 9
i 1 - - _ _
_ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _