ML20237L094
| ML20237L094 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/18/1987 |
| From: | LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-5-A-014E, OL-5-A-14E, NUDOCS 8708270419 | |
| Download: ML20237L094 (19) | |
Text
. Y LTLco Eg ExhiWt H e_
e g'd - 3 2. 2. - 5 5 Di'
~SllEj' 77
'87 AUG 20 P5 :45 k -/Y E y
RADIOLOGICAL EERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE OBSERVATIONS AND EVALUATIONS EERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) MODULE EVACUATION OPERATIONS L
l l
OBSERVER DATA Facility:
SOC Date:
/o///els Specific Assignment: YNr: bra.orre. Ar Ec Team Leader:
l Name:
Organization:
4 Edso
Title:
Business Address:
Business Phone:
Qs2Jg{
f O
RUCLE'D RfCULATDRf COMMi$11M DechetNo,bb U D'Id Df'lci I(th.No.. A 1 l
b bdM "d i he la the matte of i
T
_C +83 31'# ~ k' ' '
$taff_.
Appiaant
/
- _ J51RilFith
/
i--
u mRECIIVED
-,w-.
latemow
___RilECTED _ _ - --
Centg 0fft -, a.m Contracta _
7" k hd-)
\\
- _. ___._DATI
- ~
Othw
~
I
_ e_2.__
-- Witnen -
m Repetu
~~ $0 ?
~
~
1 l
l i
l i
l t
1 l
l 1
l l
4 i
l 4
4
INSTRUCTIONS Introduction This form is intended as a tool for the observer to use in observing and evaluating an exercise.
There are several different " modules" corresponding to different observer assignments; an observer assigned to the EOC should have the "EOC hkdule", an observer assigr.ed to the Emergency News Center should have the " Emergency News Center Module", and so on.
The module you have should correspond to your assignment.
You should bring the form along.with you when you go to observe.
The questions in it will serve as a useful guide concerning wnat to look for.
You may wish to fill out some or all of the questions while on location.
NOTE:
Some responses may already be marked as N/A because the activity is rated under another part of the response organization.
Directly below is a short explanation of what is in the form and how to fill it out; please read this explanation as soon as possible.
Concept of Form and Instructions for Use (1)
Structure and Format.
Each module is composed of several secti ons.
Eacn section is about a particular part of the emergency activities - for example, " equipment,"
" communications," or " dose assessment." Each section has two parts.
The first part is a series of questions for you to rate the performance.
The second part is a summary section, with space to write a narrative essay summarizing your overall impressions.
(2)
Rating Questions.
You have four options when answering these questions:
Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, N/A, and N/0,
" Satisfactory" means that personnel and equipment performed o
at an acceptable level.
Errors noted were not severe and the task was completed in an acceptable manner.
For example, if personnel are to check their dosimeters once every 15 minutes, but the person you are observing checks his dosimeter only 7 of the 8 times he should in 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, his performance is satisfactory.
However, your narrative summary should explain the rating.
'o
" Unsatisfactory" means that personnel and equipment i
generally performed below an acceptable level.
There were deficiencies of a significant nature.
The area's ability to carry out its function was significantly impaired.
o "N/A" stands for "not applicable."
For example, if the personnel observed did not have dosimeters, then the question, "were their dosimeters properly zerced or checked?
should be "not applicable".
In some cases, a wnole section may be not applicable.
For example, if you will be observing a local EOC, most likely the section (in your EOC module) on " Media Relations" will not be applicable, since media relations are conducted at another facility.
o "N/0" stand for "not observed"; meaning you do not know or cannot judge whether the activity was done properly.
If something should have been done (or should have been there) but wasn't, then you should mark " unsatisfactory".
(3)
Short answer cuestions.
These are generally self-explanatory.
Most are informational, asking you to list the participants at your location, or to describe a certain procedure observed, etc.
Some call for you to record a specific event, e.g. who made a certain phone call, or when someone arrived.
Be alert for these events.
(4) tone paragraph to one page)ge, you should write a brief essay Susanarv.
On the summary pa to describe and evaluate the activities and resoun:es covered by that section.
Describe the resources available and what occurred, in your own words.
You should cover the main points -raised in the rating and short answer questions, and any other observations you consider relevant; explanations of " Satisfactory" or "tJnsatisfactory" answers are also appropriate and are encouraged.
Miscellaneous Notes (1)
The front cover of the critique fom has blank lines for you to write your name, assignment, etc.
(2)
Please do not use blue ink - it does not photo-copy.
Please note: The observations and judgements recorded on' this form will be the basis for future reports and decisions.
Be thorough and clear; this will avoid the necessity of contacting you later for clarification.
2 a
4 ElERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (E0C) MODULE I.
Emergency Operations Management Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was an individual effecitvely in V
charge?
2.
If so name this individual.
- e. u c~ ee
'-=%
Asms*
3.
Was the person in charge the person so designated in the plan?
4.
Were periodic briefings held, to update staff on the situation?
[
5.
Were staff (as appropriate) involved y
in decisionmaking?
6.
Was a copy of the plan available for reference?
7.
01d staff have written procedures j
or checklists for reference?
8.
Were message logs kept?
9.
Were messages reproduced and dis-tributed, if appropriate?
10.
If so, was message handling efficient?
- 11. Was access to the EOC controlled?
N/A
- 12. When was the EOC notified on the following events (as applicable)?
- Pl ant at "Al ert" status N/A
- Plant at " Site Area Emergency" status N/A
- Plant at " General Emergency" status N/A
- 13. When were the following protective action orders issued (or received)?
- Take shelter N/A
- Evacuate N/A O
1 Sat Unsat N/A N/0 14.
If appropriate, were actions taken to coordinate emergency activiites, such as (indicate time, or write "No,"
"N/A," or "N/0"):
- Call placed to activate radiological
. monitoring teams?
N/A
- Call placed to activate relocation center?
N/A
- 15. Was Federal assistance requested?
W/A 16.
If so, indicate who requested it and what they asked for:
1 1
1 i
l i - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
R 1
l Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good performances.
Eo c.
maMwr Mr&ry m llt *
- Lem, oc cuesare S th CA6G d%
DMM Wem vnAvent-ryssuai wg run.wmo svat me GM, moon m is, arm,
ornstutzt mass u ns Go.a cwsnd Usmou nu' Fv
.r,* '
d^s y s,
1 l
1 l
i I
l l
5-
l II.
Public Alerting and Instruction A.
Public Alerting Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Did this EOC play a role in public p
alerting 2.
If so, please complete parts (a) through (c):
(a)
Indicate what started the process of public alerting, anc wnen this "ini-i tiating event" occurreo.
If alerting was played more than occa, record the time of the initiating event for each round of alerting.
Initiating Event Time (s)
Call from licensee Call from an EOC (specify)
N/A Other (specify)
(b)
Indicate how the public was alerted; l
l what action was taken at' hi s EOC to 1
alert the public.
Indicate when the action was taken.
If vehicles were dispatched, indicate how long it took to complete their routes.
Agai n, i n-dicate the times for each round of alerting played.
Action Taken Time (s).
Sirens activsted N/A Tone alert radios activated N/A
/ Vehicles dispatched (if N/A EBS activated so indicate route time)
Wils put to schools, fac-tories or other institutions (specify) personnel at another EOC.
instructed to dc one of the above (specify)
Other (specify) l l
i !
Sat Unsat N/A N/0 I
(c)
Describe the process in between the
" initiating event" and the " action taken." Did the staff simply follow instructions, or was there discussion or consultation?
)
B.
Public Instruction Drafting of instructions:
1.
Were emergency public instructions drafted in this EOC7 N/A
- 2. 'Were they generally clear and appropriate. to the situation?
N/A
~
3.
Were prescriptad messages used?
N/A 4.
Were protective action areas described in terms of familiar boundaries and l andmarks?
N/A
'l 5.
If an instruction to take shelter was formulated:
- Did it include guidance on shelter-ing methods (e.g., close windows, put cloth over mouth when outside, etc.)?
N/A
- Did it include instructions for 1
transients without shel ter (e.g.,
campers)?
N/A 6.
If an instruction to evacuate was formulated, did it incluce infor-mation/ instructions on the evacua-tion of school children?
N/A
, 1
l Sat Un sat N/A N/0 Distribution of instructions:
7.
Did this EOC play a role in distri-buting instructions to the public?
k 8.
Indicate which of the following systems I
was used to distribute instructions, EB5 4 55
- 5 l
l
^8"
"*5# 1 and at what time the message went out.
p#** " "#"
)
If public instruction was played more than once, indicate the time messages ow ""'*"
went out for each round.
Message Distribution System Time (s)
EDS N/A Tor,e alert radios N/A
/ Vehicles with PA systems j
/ Calls to schools, factories, or other institutions (specify)
Personnel at another location ~
~ instructed to do one of the 1
above (specify)
Other (specify) 9.
Was the timing of public instruction j
coordinated with the public alerting p(rocess, so that public alertinge.g., sirans) was followed immedi-I ately by an instructional message?
N/A
- 10. Were instructional messages period-l ically repeated?
/
l l
l I
I I
I 1 I
t Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnances.
5 b
e
-9
a e
t III.
Protective ktion A.
Evacuation and Access Control Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was activation of traffic control points promptly ordered?
/
2.
Were estimates of expected traffic volume discussed?
/
3.
According to EOC staff, are appro-priate resources available to keep evacuation routes clear:
- During bad weather?
- In event of stalled or wrecked cars?
/
4.
Were these resources activated for the exercise?
/
5.
Were appropriate actions ordered to control all types of access to the contaminated area:
- All roads blocked?
- FF traffic rerouted?
/
- Water traffic stopped?
/
~
- Rail traffic stopped?
7 6.
According to EOC staff, are local resources adequate to cover all i
i traffic and access control functions simultaneously:
- In terms of available personnel?
/
- In tems of available vehicles?
~~~
- If not, was help promptly requested?
7.
Were relocation centers ordered to be activated in a timely fashion:
N/A l
- 10 '-
9 B.
Special Evacuation Problems Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was evacuation of onsite individuals demonstrated?
N/A 2.
If so was it:
- Promptly activated?
N/A
- Well organized?
W 3.
Were the EOC staff aware of the location of mobility-impaired indi-viduals in the area (whether insti-tutionalized or at home)?
/
4.
Was this infomation in written fom?
/
5.
Were they aware of the particular special needs of mobility-impaired residents?
/
6.
Was this infomation in written fom?
/
7.
Were arrangements made for transpor-tation of mobility-impaired persons?
V 8.
If school children are to be evacu-ated by bus:
- According to participants, are enough buses and drivers available to cover the schools in the plume EPI?
N/A
- How are drivers contacted?
N/A
- Was contact of drivers demonstrated?
N/A
- Was an EBS message prepared to infom parents as to where children were being taken?
N/A 9.
(Whether or not schoolchildren are to be evacuated by bus) were arrangements made to deal with possible traffic jams (of parents) at the school s?
N/A
~
C.
Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Protective Actions Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1.
Was current information available on the location of:
- Dairy f arms?
N/A Food processing plants?
N/A
- Water supply intake points?
N/A 2.
Were there detailed maps availaole showing crop information?
N/A 3.
What recoiseendations were made re-garding ingestion pathway protective actions, and what were they based on?
4.
According to EOC staff, is there a body of trained staff to work individually with farmers, food-workers, water utilities, and so on to implement protective actions?
N/A e
g i
9 Summary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section.
Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Explain both deficiencies and good performances.
o ye
-ru re,<
m sas ynr.~s ae m e m eru*y.
/
Ar res Coc Lid L, AQ**'d T'u 3
Ea64 ryg gew ys
[t Aa<aaue)
.e w wec.w
<ms w6:C
<*ed pouEg v6y wFu.
a
.. w.,
e-e.y n e. u.,
u.., ~,-a s.r. ~ ~. m 3., w ~.
e.r
.mw.r oem ty ytre (2.2 Ac e r w.
Ps* 4 ofMr!"C 04-%H is C oas osa cr*1 os e f 7 fA-JM Inps e.rdip og& M of-(ks0 c.nands w erM o.or NO ef.
htyren
\\
I 1
i l
l l
l l
i iy _
i 1
1 IV.
Recovery and Re-Entry 1
Sa ','
Unsai N/A N/0 t
1.
If evacuation was ordered:
i, Were arrangements made th'secree the evacuated areas?
./
-Werepolicy/proceduresdevelo$.9'd,t
'on allowing enty to evacuaten areas for essential services (e.g.,
s to milk dairy cow;)?
N/A y
2.
Was relaxation of protective actions
/
based on monitor data indicating safe
-l levels of radioactivity?
i ci
'P/A
_2 i
3.
Were re-entry / recovery decisiota) l i
communicated promptly to all response organizations?
L _.,
4.
Were arrangements made to provide the public with infonnat!on on:
i t
- Safety precautions during re.tovery?
N/A
- Possible health effecta of lox..
Tc level exposure?
- Availability of compenstAtien for" N/A s
financial losses sustain.att',,
N/Aa n
.I g
h
\\
i
\\
1
\\,
i i
r
{
.\\
\\
A
)
6 s
j 4
4
,i t,
i I
s
.,?, i-(
]
t b
e
,;I t
a 14 -
- ^
,.,' t y
'i 8
a Stamaq rin your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this sectica.
N* *.he facts recorded in the questions in perspective.
Exp1stc,bott deficiencies and good performances.
1 t
4, i
\\
l L
i
'l
?
l I
i i
i l.
e i
\\
[
}
)
~
l
't.
\\
1
3 15 -
3
.1
Y.
Scenario Summary Comment on the adequacy of the scenario.
Did it provide enough activity? Was it realistic? Did it test areas of earlier deficiency?
f
-n.e apes
%sres M
puenuo more u nu, n-
~.
_.7 i
O e
16 -
8 60 Ece.
$ccu e5 gg n 8 Jo i*- Aw.An ~J
%p
%22 SaasH Vnte ase a cat as za 3 '35" M
C*%
TELLS EM*4' 5%G' "'T* C
& dT*
/
bj 7e
- cyg,
- ' 5 betj krc y
,01e M 9I?
f t*V 54 f
op p,,gg,
w 4r A=,.m.
-m".
r-
-,4 I
EDC
[*e M Trut om,aM s4p e *'t f,ag a Mm s* *tc Wh
\\
fo /4 TM iM T4JW
~?*
ANC rw 6;cr-w rMfa ecesau t fdec vg esr, s
m s
C ""4 T'
f s *4 *-
MA ! +t sial oi vs n,fss M r l
M
' T **
C M -.
9 Tafd y
j u.,
s.ca y
<=.
e+~
-r m i2 s r, <
zy - r
,,,s u aas n
/z t .
Cve<. Als Goto Gers gear
' keves rr bif' U 'M o'
~
tz /4
- E + <- 'thc-
% C4us p sn j
a <b <m _
ErrvW 4
1.ALy.st fp46 70
-~
M.$-
! " 1--
lt 1")
EUAC CooAd
,.sertr< tup s4 c e A BUS 6^* f fst*C- **'
g.v e c. f M yz
/ t 35' 0/asen~ &r E v.*c A rtnet
- aerrer, S"T N f/6tp Jz g9 brg f p ']Urr
~
zis tum%
Ph *o C*GN f-cury sgorns CM. Leo 13co t
/l&ymp
- f*C b CC e df,,,3[
j]oy
/]lC D/cf P *#$
A0 CAEN T*
C comme NW rrator of
.y p
( Prr-c%,,,e 6,
/J5f
[W Md*M M8 # F
E s m n.or< y 4 + r= wyn A
RD CL PZ Ar tz.47-
_gg g o a) s Perf rc y m6scNA m
nn rn u <ie
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _