ML20237L084

Applicant Exhibit A-14C,consisting of 861001 Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise Observations & Evaluations Re Emergency Operations Ctr Module on Radiological Assessment

ML20237L084
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	05/18/1987
From:	LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
To:
References
OL-5-A-014C, OL-5-A-14C, NUDOCS 8708270415
Download: ML20237L084 (18)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ p. LELLO Ex' Sk; bit \\ % c. e f g - 3 2. 2 - [2 ( - 3 f kl-' $l

• B7 g go pg 44 l4 - / 4' C-D '.,

z. RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE OBSERVATIONS AND EVALUATIONS EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) MODULE RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OBSERVER DATA Facility: Eoc Date: 10 - / - 8 (, Specific Assignment: 24 d /do IN C@rd'M 'b Team Leader: Name: Organization:

Title:

re I r e/A i Business Address: Business Phone: 87o827pd$ 2 p PDR G

CXLIAR RIGtlulTORY COntst4N Docket Na, hU ~3 2 2 0 4-f Oncid Ist k kSC la the matter of $sth E\\AhNachA riWCr-5bh'c~ - Sbtf-IDINTFIED _ / % nt. RECEIVED - laternoo'- RUICTED _ Cast's Off'r Chattutor DATI b '(I'b on.r wa, - EN _ - v M 0.N \\

1 l INSTRUCTIONS l Introduction This fom is intended as a tool for the observer to use in observing and l evaluating an exercise. There are several different " modules" corresponding to different observer assignments; an observer assigned to the EOC should have the "EOC Module", an observer assigned to the Emergency i News Center should have the " Emergency lNws Center Module", and so on. The i module you have should correspond to y::;r assignment. You should bring the fem along with you when you go to observe. The l quet.tions in it will serve as a useful guide concerning what to locx for. You may wish to fill out rome or all of the questions while on location. NOTE: Some responses may already be marked as N/A because the activity is 1 rated under another part of the response organization. l Directly below is a short explanation of what is in the form and how to fill it out; please read this explanation as soon as possible. I Concent of Form and Instructions for Use t I (1) Structure and Format. Each module is composed of several l secti ons. Eacn section is about a particular part of the i emergency activities - for example, " equipment," " communications," or " dose assessment." Each section has two parts. The first part is a series of questions for you to rate the perfomance. The second part is a summary section, with space to write a narrative essay summarizing your overall i impressions. (2) Rating Ouestions. You have four options when answering these questions: Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, N/A, and N/0. Satisfactory" means that personnel and equipment perfomed o at an acceptable level. Errors noted were not severe and l the task was completed in an acceptable manner. For example, if personnel are to check their dosimeters once I every 15 minutes, but the person you are observing checks his dosimeter only 7 of the 8 times he should in 2 hours, his perfomance is satisfactory. However, your narrative summary should explain the rating. " Unsatisfactory" means that personnel and equipment o generally performed below an acceptable level. There were l deficiencies of a significant nature. The area'.s ability to i carry out its function was significantly impaired. l l

o "N/A" stands for "not applicable." For example, if the personnel observed did not have dosimeters, then the question, "are tneir dosimeters properly zurced or checxed? should be "not applicable". In some cases, a whole section 4 may be not applicable. For example, if you will be I observing a local EOC, most likely the section (in your EOC l module) on " Media Relations" will not be applicable, since media relations are conduct 6d at another facility. l o "N/0" stand for "not observed"; meaning you do not know or cannot judge whether the activity was done properly. If something should have been done (or should have been there) but wasn't, then you should mark " unsatisfactory". (3) Short answer cuestions. These are generally self-explanatory. Most are informational, asking you to list the participants at j your 1ccation, or to descMbe a certain procedure observed, i etc. Some call for you to record a specific event, e.g. who l made a certain phone call, or when someone arrived. Be alert for these events. (4) Sunr.p3g. On the summary page, you should wHte a brief essay lone paragraph to one page) to describe and evaluate the activities and resources covered by that section. Describe the resources available and what occurred, in your own words. You should cover the main points raised in the rating and short answer questions, and any other observations you consider relevant; explanations of " Satisfactory" or "tJnsatisfactory" answers are also appropriate and are encouraged. Miscellaneous Notes (1) The front cover of the critique form has blank lines for you to wMte your name, assignment, etc. (2) Please do not use blue ink - it does not photo-copy. Please note: The observations and judgements recorded on this fom will be the basis for future reports and decisions. Be thorough and clear; this will avoid the necessity of contacting you later for claMfication. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) MODULE RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT I. Operations Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1. Was an individual effectively in charge? X 2. If so, name this individual. 3. Was the person in charge the T person so designated in the plan? 4. Is there a direct link to the Y onsite emergency organization? l 5. Was this link effectively X utilized? 6. Was information and data trans-mitted from the onsite e:nergency X organization in a timely manner? l I U % Me.M Q 8 f A A b a gg g L N A.ch ne.r,, es r $ '% + deci p,J+L.r-d c, /, o'f eo 4 r-l I n h * %u *{ X/q s, p u l w O I.

] Sumary c.e fA. In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective. Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnance. bypo L hc./ (p A -+ 0 9 3 0, E o n / E o c o p<.e. lu wu cace PM-13 t.l ' cw E'd e t 100 5~ - G oocf p u h m *u u. % c. s es v~ r y 100 v l' n. i n/o b. el N e. l-iv < dic s b.u. f k< 2ars. Act ers"cn r hn S o z + -o 4 - d de. ^Ie clr h Se *' A g e n,5 vi e r (z$ o9s2- %n cero <J,~s. n pstz e y(m, p >,.< n T +L. I % I.e.,s b< k mq L. + fu Col1 u u w a d,c.bly i ~ GH-e S kE

c. u m t-ez ~~a.-. +-)

. G-ooc /,pu % ouer . f. p w e.e d u.ce s. dw esMh-c, u s-e /0 os - PAR Boer d OuWS s k e. % .( a(\\ w, I Q_. P A-2 go ~ a, >< g u ne.c cleu s up en,s, n~ S sw A-6 cP P2 S b o vi d c m,+ 4 Lc s h-E. TV<fle Ee9

u. ec.}.c

-l t, u 4 &w 10 ~ u

• [

ha F6 c. m y J, a f-Q }l

• 00 -

(E.H< lf--0 Y d'J L uC1 l* c.< m l c.v *{ . A cl> u 9 5 F A e t d bea n s. gGo o d s w<, m i,eJ c g eL ~ k h -e t >v w o r ic. u i z a h n s. / / '. '2. / - N A. M ( (A tw { h g e,gy [ b le /

a. c.

b, <r - + Ac.w, a N f w e.<- s.c u y. o h C 't ik s i 9 /Z. /0 R4c/ sop. ge.y,J d.A d.dcq e.d b y2.o w.1 Q.H-C J >.&s ks vu k1 v g a.ae.s c.c prs k(os.s 4uldunt !a le.:a l, i vau. Ho om eurza k A l ca k,.t j M p m p Yt,_' C. N G h G t.~.:' T~b M.f HoEJ Y use4 -f-o e <J a. h 1--ra m s uittivu, v.n te xs i re a vir e d by sc eu a r'o > '9 o' O M u t' h' l" M C o r' (a roo r cl i.s c u t st h h e l'est e-dr<//,c, VCl E~CCLC0 5 05 ed L b O iS b y /?c] Y ' M WWp w- <<ff I a c, L 5-and lu

p. M.s d o. h tv 1 L... e n issia,s. Cmah.c/ &n,r,u, se i.

i n... .~.c.

II. Dose Assessment and Protective Action Recommendations 1 A. Dose Projection Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1. Were expected doses derived from: . plant release data? gof% w S - field readings?for a e,w o are cs y A,e m 2. Was the ability to make dose calculations via computer or programable calculator demonstrated effectively? X 3. Were hand calculations demonstrated p effectively ? 4. Were dose calculations made promptly? N 5. Were dose calculations egg g for accuracy? Ch o A E,.t)F reau Ih - 6. Was field monitoring data promptly and accurately plotted on a map? N 7. Were monitor teams promptly directed to new locations, to defir.e the y extent of the plume? 8. Was the plume correctly defined? Y 9. Did field readings come in promptly? N U 10. Was there a periodic estimation of total population exposure? 10a. Where field data became available were dose calculations reassessed ) promptly? (gg A, j go ye 1 B. Protective Actidn Recommendations

11. Were the procedures followed for reaching protective action decisions with respect to:

- plume pathway hazards? Y - ingestion pathway hazards? x, U([ , %ff 12. Were the decisions based on EPA exposure guidelines? ,a g f, , y - plume pathway Y S CV, - inantion oathway X

1 i Sat Unsat N/A N/0

13. Were procedures followed and

) other factors (e.g. plant status, evacuation time estimates, weather) considered in making the protective action recommendation for: - plume pathway N '- ingestion pathway x

14. Were protective action recommendations promptly reviewed and updated as conditions changed?

) - plume pathway X - ingestion pathway x

15. Were protective action recomunendations coordinated among states (if more than one state was involved)?

- plume pathway X - ingestion pathway y 16. Was use of KI recomunended for: - emergency workers in the field? X - selected populations (persons whose imediate evacuation may )? be infeasible or very difficult N/A - the general population? N/A

17. Were decisions about KI (whother or l

not its use was reconnended) - consistent with the plan? N - properly based on actual or expected radiciodine release? X 18. If use of KI was recommended: /da o /M h us ce.c 000 M- - Who gave the authorization? - When was this decision reached? Fo i hrw. n c, H v o. m h e <. / ec. /c. - When, and to whom, was it transmitted? Afe age./([ becc./ h5 f %h. !Hb'" Hu i k Ca n, u t c-J e 6. -E-

1 \\ Sur; nary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resoun:es, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective. Explain both deficiencies and good performances. k cs k F h 11eu w - t' /, O vera ll pe < f.w w w ce n+ c od. i A.vea. w o. s 2, BWL A a p Team sup p w t-c.f-E O C w s g c fPeeh w s' ecrm p e)-ext. E x ca l k t-ve< y/, z., -h a y 7, e./ ol -leo m c. xA 3 Pro kh n Aettn S+> M 6o~d w k < le. V C0M '/'A I !O t' YYO *16 6 V1 (m,f. I'v ~ d c 't2, er e p. a. l l c lte iheriw t a f /0 ~!!es es fvser llc m e m a./ le ro ch ur e_, S A,E j l'

a. rush J 9 2-

& l9 2l'd C O 0. D Ch l2y W{O> )n (5 h h C C.r'S le

0. II E t' 2 2entes ).

Uee.ds ws au u n d a CavC h l 5'Vpesv M! O - yt 1 o et l}. Ra.d. Idea 1% Cov y ch u hw Pua d1 +D b e-9 m p w c.e z r e } & u %i & h A,, w c, <- x % f a} d.cm.u n w sl c o. w h.e. m+aw, e a >- Ii ec', so p u k,Ii c ap$p w p v, a.)-e I y a d v< ce J to aeeJz.mm,w,- n.se cLt.0 i EP 2-m ep '" Eo C ehovid eo~b h ve s. La<qe.- kou 4 a k-s in ce_ T+ b e cenzes po.s he d c <a <v%o u FJ a &cd a n d e c<. if le g.s Lea elp & v t,es queak.I y turi n'-{u' fD Aubli c Li%mahn 4 c 9 +o aMe-wp% k s h o t< {d be. n (y A-cc> k+ krs ess mu t )%po3 izc) e cn jv2,jt,4 3t<vvey I + +1 -e- .er, ), G. S e e-cm etz 4 , Er f ^p 4. 2 a 7. 0-a d Nea I% Wd. S?R IN h*'<- P *, ke{ W W

III. Protective ktion A. Evacuation and Access Control Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1. Was activation of traffic control N points promptly ordered? N/A l 2. Were estimates of expected traffic T,. Volume discussed? N/A 3. kcording to EOC staff, are appro-priate resources available to keep evacuation routes clear: l - During bad weather? N/A X - In event of stalled or wrecked cars? N/A j_ 4. Were these resources activated for the exercise? N/A Y 5. Were appropriate actions ordered to control all types of access to the contaminated area: - All roads blocked? N/A - KF traffic rerouted? N/A ~ - Water traffic stopped? W ^ l - Rail traffic stopped? W y 6. According to EOC staff, are local resources adequate to cover all traffic and access control functions simultaneously: l - In tems of available personnel? N/A ^ - In tems of available vehicles? N/A - If not, was help promptly l requested? N/A X 7. Were relocation centers ordered to u be activated in a timely fashion: A N/A ) l I 1

B. Special Evacuation Problems Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1. Was evacuation of onsite individuals N/A >c demonstrated? 2. If so was it: N/A Promptly actiyated? N/A _v - Well organized? 3. Were the EOC staff aware of the location of mobility ixpaired indi-viauals in the =rea (whether insti-p N/A tutionalized or at home)? X N/A 4. Was this infomation in written fom? 5. Were they aware of these. persons par-N/A y ticular special needs? t N/A 6. Was this infomation in written form? Were arrangements matie for transpor-j g 7. N/A tation of these persons? 8. If school children are to be evacu-ated by bus: - According to participants, are enough buses and drivers available to cover Y W/A the schools in the plume EPI? - How are drivers contacted? - Was contact of drivers y N/A demonstrated? - Was an EBS message prepared to inform parents as to where children / N/A were being taken? 9. (Whether or not schoolchildren are to be evacuated by bus) were arrangements made to deal with possible traffic M N/A jams (of parents) at the school s?. _ _ _ _ _. _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ -

W vai ab e ~ ~ _~"~ ~~~ on l l at on T " _"~~~~ _ a i info 7_ rm nt of: curre location nts? s? Y t!as intake pointvailab e pla f am ? ng l. the s l si oces Dairyod pr a ly s detailed m p ? s pp a u f n } o $ 5 Fo 6 rmation r e Wate ade r ive ct info m the rop were ote ed o ? re n pr bas vi ndatioi n pathway ns c wing they 2, + io comme st o re nd what we

3. What re inge rd ng i

/ ion, a ga s ct a e ther g EOC staff, is work to od-ed staff fo s o r, and sion ? s e to farm ain is act rding tr with ilit e,ve body of co cti Ac individual y l ut r ote 4 wate nt pr a s e r,mplem rke i wo to on e

l sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective. Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnances. j i I I l 5 1 I I l I l 1 IV. Radiological ExposurLControl Answer the following(questions only if this EOC is in the plume 10-eile) EPZ, or if dosimetry was distributed to field workers from this EOC. Sat Unsat N/A N/0 1. Was the following dosimetry equipment avail able-(Direct-Read Dosimeters) y - Low range (0-200 mR)? i - Mid range (0-20 R)?

r

- High range (0-200 R)? y - Charger for the dosimeters? Y - Record keeping cards? v - Pennanent record dosimeters, as y film badges or TLD's? 2. Was the supply of dosimeters adequate: X 3. Were appropriate instructions issued )( along with the dosimeters? 4. Was an adeq)uate suoply of potassium y iodide (XI availasle? 5. Was someone there aware of proper Y procedures concerning its use? 6. Was someone there aware of the maximum v-dose allowed without authorization? 7. Was someone there aware of decontam-ination procedures (i.e., when and X where to go for decontamination)? 8. If the EOC was in the plume, were measures taken to protect the EOC personnel against exposure (e.g., closing down ventilation)? I

6 Sumary In your own words, describe and evaluate the demonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective. Explain both deficiencies and good performances. I V. Recovery and Re-Entry Yes No N/A N/0 1. If evacuation was ordered: - Were arrangements made to secure the evacuated areas? N/A - Were policy / procedures developed 'on allowing entry to evacuated areas for essential services (e.g., to milk dairy cows)? N/A_ 2. Was relaxation of protective actions based on monitor data indicating safe X levels of radioactivity? 3. Wre re-entry / recovery decisions communicated pros.ptly to all response y organizations? 4. Were arrangements made to provide the public with information on: X - Safety precautions during recovery? - Possible health effects of low-M level exposure? - Availability of compensation for financial losses sustained? N/A 9 Sununary In your own words, describe and evaluate the oesonstrated activities, capabilities and resources, or lack thereof, covered by this section. Put the facts recorded in the questions in perspective. Explain both deficiencies and good perfonnances. 8 15 - )

VI. Scenario Sumary Comnent on the adequacy of the scenario. Did it provide enough activity? Was it realistic? Did it test areas of earlier deficiency? I ~5' CS 4 16 - _ _ _ _ _ _}}