ML20237K571
| ML20237K571 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/1985 |
| From: | TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20237K565 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-87-87, FOIA-87-A-14 DQP-QA-12, NUDOCS 8708270219 | |
| Download: ML20237K571 (8) | |
Text
_
yu y
.v-
- ?f& c, r
'IP PROCEDURE /
--c-
.,.o.'
INSTRUCTION REVISION ISSUE pg nusco DATE eu DQP-QA-12 0
6/3/85 1 of 4
.-s';
G j sy PREPARED BY: /
d&
J/3//f.r
,[)
P.'
ADMINISTRATIONhNDTRACKINGOF F
/
DATE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS Rt00RTS (SDAR's)
APPROVED BY:
/(( f,s g#. / g
{,
f DATE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
INFORMATION ONLY 1.1 Purmse h'
To establish a method for administration and 'tfacking of SDAR's which gi; have already been reported to the Nuclear Re'gulatory Comission (NRC) by the appropriate TUGC0 Quality Assurance (QA) Personnel. This s' 2 procedure will assure timely responses to the NRC.
pe i
1.2 Scope This procedure applies to Dallas-and-Site initiated SDAR's generated P{
in accordance with References 1.4.1 and 1.4.2, respectively.
r 1.3 Definitions None
)
1.4 References
)
},,
i 1.4.1 DQP-CO-4 Reporting of Significant Deficiencies c
i i
~
} '-
'q" 1,4.2 Site QA Procedure CP QP-16.1 Significant Construction;'
Deficiencies
.a 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
.a
. ; e '."f. 2.1 Supervisor, Quality Assurance'-(OA) Services is responsible for th e
4 w'
generating reports on items reported to the NRC. This responsib'ility l
may be delegated.
l
- i 2.2 Quality Assurance Services (QAS) Office cAssistant is responsible fora i
ws
. t. -
logginc, trackingedistributing. and fi 9 SDAR's and their assoc 1=.1,
~
'6 ated corresponifencei h
Mi C".v44WM.44 T
1
.. au... a.
' j. ;
- t 4
.0 PROCEDilRE4 L I-Y;i
,. 3 ~~
.,x
. Wo -
ucrit.
/19.,
7 3.1'Preparind.
hi J
- 'th epo
-;' $.di,'.h.; h.. @.
1, :i B708270219 070819
(:.
~Tt i
. ' ' f. '. ',
V,.'%
. gj; 1
BAUMAN87-A-14 PDR j
. ;j e,a i-I 9
.A I
W.'
L 600 100'ON 31STilPI-OdN T2 :t'T 18/0T/20 20kb ZEt V j
rw......
h.[ t.
DQP-QA-12 Rev. O Page 2 of 4 f.N
}.D/
~?
f
"?-
3.1.1 Once a deficiercy has been initially reported tos the;NRC.,in ~ b
/
accordance with References 1.4.1 or 1.4.2, a' formal report'. f
'~
~
will be prepared and submitted to the NRC Region IV. office;"
C "%
within 30 days.
lcr y" p.7 "-
\\
n
.~
i.
A a.
If the deficiency is determined to be reportable,i 9
.(
report shell include:
gi.... h..:,
4
~
?.
1.
Description of the deficiency Y
2.
Analysis of the safety implications 3.
Corrective Actions 4
Sufficient information to permit analysis and eva1L'ation of the deficiency and corrective actic>n b.
Ifthedeficiencyisdeterminedtobenotreportable,-
the NRC will be advised of this determination.
3.1.2 If sufficient inforstation is not available to enable l
completion of the report within 30 days, an interim report containing all available information and a target date for g
completion will be submitted.
S 3.1.3 The Director, QA will review all reports to the NRC.
3.1.4 Each report is due to the Vice President for his review and signature five days before the date due to the NRC. In his e absence or una%ailability, the Director, QA may sign the
'..~5 l report.,
. lglj
/
3.2 Distributing the Report
,[
a.
3.2.1 All reports will then be forwarded to the NRC Regiun IV T
k., "l office (two copies) with copies to appropriate TUGCO.
6;._
P4h personnel and to:
^?f :
ce
.w D
Director, inspection & Enforcement Y.
W?
c/o Distribution, Services. Branch, DDC, ADM.
.. ' ~
MM;...
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory, Commission p
1 m
Washington, DC 20555
,a
.,.,ff
-j 3.2.2 If a deficiency is determined to be reportable, a copy of
- 1 the report will also be sent to:
- q. ;jgjN
' ( u.3 RecordsiCenter..
h,.
M.
j
.g Instituto of Nuclear Power Operat
?
bj, 1100~ Circlet 7S' Parkway..Su te
. AtlantabGA 30339,
$ ;n
.c -
s Nh l
jf. ' l t.
'y J
{
.h.,. 5 %,-
., m.
~,
K j;
l;. ",
- o
' (Tk fj;.
MSN
..;,-._ 'Y.
'l '
.r
.('
OTO 400 'Ot t 31ST11N-Da 4 E:rT 19/0140 20vt Ev 102
W '~~
,f, r,,
N 00P-QA-12 Rev. 0 Page 3 of.4. /$$$I-
~
~& y G r.
e 3.3 Follow-up Follow-up responses will be submitted as required by the NRC.
3.4 togcing and Tracking 3.4.1 The OAS Office Assistant will complete and maintain the"SignificantDeficiencyAnalysisReport(SDAR) Log *
(See Figure.1).
3.4.2 Infonnation required on the log will be extracted from the SDAR and the request for engineering support. The QAS Office Assistant will calculate and record the dates -
the report is due to the NRC and to the Vice President.
3.4.3 The QAS Office Assistant will advise the Supervisor, QA Services or his designee of due dates.
3.4.4 The Supervisor, QA Services will issue verbal or written reminders to affected personnel to assure timely resolution of deficiencies, Figure 1 - Significant Deficiency Analysis Report (SDAR) Log 4
.l r
.6 N.
eJ
~
e i
- g..,
Sf g
y:'
.,..,c
. t.-
U,
'y
, 't {y?.p',$,h
.v
,i -
._:t.;
Y_
. ::!i
=
{
T. Y g).! ;i,
.=
yq yv
?
~., ; Y.
4' s
~.$
,,l f _ - E -
- 'i
_,,,.j}U s
^ $ Q,.
7.,
~
- 3.. ~
,a '
v' '
askf 110 100'0N 31STiln-DdN GE:ri 48/0T/20 3
~-
-20kk dEk 10E
f pa eD R
4 l
f af o
ng
-l' i o 4
FL e
g t
a r
P o
pe et s.
Ra D
s i&
r ef t g e
nc I L C
, b R
eN a
G Do O
t L
e s
.tI
)
n A
pR R
oC D
sB S
e T
(
Ro t
,l.
R ee O
st na P
m E
S oD R
I p
- /. S se LY eu
~
pN AL D
vat Et 4
4 1
.A L
=
A M
RY
= '
1 p, '*.
A GT RE e
E Y EF gt b
R C A
a U N S
LD k'-
G E I
I F C s.,
- b I
e F
l E
f
~
't D
e t
s g N.
T a
e.
N HD
=
A
~
C I
I F
N I
e O
tJr T
l i
A b
S N
I e
.h e
p M
l R " b
=
E t
T p
E 'l,,R D ~
y
_ 'ic'.
.t.
a
- nc 5
0 on
.y L:
e.
?:: - ' - yM g?.w.
- 5. R 9i- }/ :%
- s'-
s -
_ k((n-
- i
^
ie
,t7~--
pc ti
..h v p.
s i
W.
?
"F.M s.
e-ii li A <. 9.$.g#c.N fR-rf
, i=
s ce T.
,~
y.
S,..
- e sD 2
c g '.
, ^
2.. f{'J r
.' y a. r :
,.w
%v-f e
..A a a.
's
'.Q'.. mC
.c.
Df s
e :
1
- q o
o.St 'g3g
-&Y
?
.f f
n
- r.
p y:
(, ; _
, i.
~,
.3 a@f,.,k'
'~.&
t I
3
~
s,.,,t. S~ s *.f. e(
e
.2 Dt -
7 D_
s
%.,X " e.. g '. ';t *- r.
I a
(,.
a l
l
. : Y-gi. T p.
.T
,fs
- ~w5 p 2
1 Qi
?E P
.V
.^ -.
e~
C 7
5
- e. 5
/c
- - p p
- DN a.
4.E.
s S
-l
,.o tOo d=
g 3-d,T uS wU r-oOt4 NNT.OIO t
ot pa
~
~
~
eD
~
R l
~
aJ ng ie
~
FL
~
~
't r
o m.=
pe a
u e
et Ra
=
D
~
n e
i&
~
~
r eF t g no IL C'
R u
eN G
Do
~
O t
~
~
~
~
~
L e
s
,li1
)
n R
oC
~
A pR D
sB
~
~
~
S e
~
~
~
(
Ro t
T I
R ee O
st P
na E
S oD R
I p
/. b sc LYDeo
~
b'l ALERD VAT
~
EI S NE U
A t
RYQ&
m GIE 1
ll EEf e V
MyC EM Y
gt
~
I
/
i W? :.'
oa
~
U S
tD
- 1. g E L
7 C d
I e
T D
eie
,g
' u.
. ?-
i
, $+h.
~' *...'
E f
~
ytt y
T aa A
I a
T N
n
~
&.j I
ND I
_r C
I
' @v.
d ~.
I A
b
.m O
~
D'Jc I
!I I
e
~
G T
l f4
~ -
3 l-R "
b
..M
~
~r,
.$..w S
N a
e
+
IMfl
~..
~
~
E t
~
T E
,R i=
~
~
E
)
T '-
'.6
- 3.:.
t y
fT-
=- ie
~
d;
..g i
nc
'q/ % *"
.e* ~.%
$ g,.
P.-
%m'9-['
i c.
on s
i-j t.:
L w&g T
a
- q't - ?
h', ). -.v:
- k
]
ti
. s 4, y%.b
~"
pc f.g N 7-Na t
'e.
ii Ng%: gll p
%, *.A
~-
~ ~ -
rf i
p v;3y.'.
[.
- i&Y.W%,f,'. a
. W[:t
- . 4.& &s.
i Q',y%?
D K* -
ce s:
~
1 sC y ;.%
h 6
W e
4 i
'yc..*.w8" ;
g4 E
f /
N1+1:.fy.~
- I
\\
fp?jg'
- j ~ l
.f j
- (
2 ja...
5 i
3
- W'
's A. * '. -
.y,
f
,R i t
l j
c. R(1 4
.?
K~
e_
.w Dt
. E.-
a o. a.,
y ;;.
Q *Q<.'-
m r
4 D.
I.
I a D_
^
4yg sl1 1
1
._ 'iY *@3 _.
'4 v;J.s
, d 2
y L-
. 4Wm, F,' A -
[
.u j6..
u S
g S'.
g h. ' -
3
'f qT, *
~ '
l
',8 6z W$Jqt =
R 9" nG4W gpq
OM l
l'
. at
. ~
4_
- 4 a
,r
- 1
.ssL-. h.,sQe ~ m3..
~
.=
D
'3 o
. 'N
. j
.t o
..e E.*~
_. v.
h a4.
L
- W +.
(a
- f-r,.
. sv.
{:$' 3?$'tW j
?
A.
- p
((.,
2 M9
.f c.
f, -.-
l.,.f
.&,.~ hY~ ych'.. -
e..i 4f.<. ~.v.
. V fD
- by v
,L W. :..
f' g.
l~ ;.
ipw
- a,d.w.3
^
e i'
Ds.
V y.
~
,c c
~%
>t.
r r;s Le.-
ro"
^
S '.
u,; *$
9y
,$g'.he'
.l' f,. f r. F.-
g n
a
, f
+k' mqM - -.
t
.- e,-
ii
^
-g
- ,w,'
.cp 1^.' '
- a s.5.. e
. t.
- e
.* T.yg. *, g [ 4h.4.,
.r
..m it
. % {L f !-.
t.
g.,
~
e DY,..'
A.
. no
..S.
f t
l s.
s.
cn s.
. y I
r
~
1
~
U' 1)
_Hg E
L gd C l
i
.t
^.
\\
_b
_l{, " HI d.., W4
.e g
5 i
i
_ b
- d) -.
s it t
l
-1 i
. e - T c
5 I
l wI J_
t I
r g,,
I Df
- Y.
I, A&
i l
c aof2M t.
l
.P _
l f i
. ttH
.e i C. )2p f&
f f
E
_. e I
i F
. d C
l
)
i f
D1,
)b.
c f
t A.
i %
. ao
!i
.d tg f.
e f R W R.C=yf%
AQ
. WN t
t t
A e h).
l EA
,t l
l n
5UE.
1 AV k
es S.
DRtUL.
A ueD
)
p I/
R D.
S E
in P
t s 1
ce f0 i
t t
oR
(
_ I e S
! s D
Hp A
Cc R
a
)
se L
t G
O oD u
l c
lP
. I l.
. lI
$e on
. gt
_ ie r
.. &i m
. D
. aR
~
. te
~
. ep o
r
- t J
c I l
. ni
. y n f',N, 4
r,.'
...%a l
~. ;
. A R
. De
.ip t o er t
- i S
D F - '
.b e
Yg @' . >'
i D;..r.s,'at
.?h t
a n
s e a r
n l
.1.
,p* "8 4,,,%,
j 4
8,
,f, UNITED STATES
{
j
[
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
E wa$MINGTON, D. C. 205.55 i
8 j
o
%...../
i i
i FACSIMILE SERVICE REQUEST f
DATEQ.[/d 7
"PIEASE USE OARK PEN 7'<
wwEn rittInc our a REMOVE ALL STAPLES b.CA///dS"f-I MEssACE T0:
f 73 CITY & STATE K i m o Or a ssk. T A 4/fl~/ 12 T g
TELECOPYNbE MM.
Y ' D i.
I
,.-n;s,.f..g
~1 VERIFICATION NUMBER F7 5 - 4 ff - / 3 J 6 N NO. OF PAGES / '3 EXCLUDING COVER SHEET RETURN COPIES YES ( )
J NO ()
MESSAGE FROM: _R,deIekson)
TELECOPY NUMBER 9 e/ No 3 RAPIFAX AUTOMATIC
~
301-427-4403 3M VRC AUTOMATIC VERIFICATION NUMBER 301-427-4072_
/_,_,_ BUILDING WILLSTE OFFICE PHONE 7 '// 9 '/
MAIL STOP fl/ 80
~
CLASS OF SERVICE OVER NIGHT 4 HOUR 1 HOUR IMEDIATE J
j33
..w':
3,,.'.
~ i - s m @.
~ ' '.
[
j' b
l '
+
9 I
}n+ ^ ;n.
.s. m j
T00 a 0 0 Ot1 315 T*)lr1-Ddt I rT:rT 18/01 20 i
l 20VV LEV T02 u
r
- 1 D
i, l LA
/NPv&NT OS 77767 l
A / i neMeh D P Q - CA - /2-wxs svanczeo a A/EC c S
/
(ifev -o)
~
/Tru a
/o /2 i,/ F5 wees mwar we maa
, swr a
&/bl~b WL /k~K. By Rtx.-
9 8
m m
4
'**':e_...~
"*p+c=.,
_p..
N '
')*'
f T:PI
.'8/0T/20 20## 22# T02
l
&e*5 UNITED STATES
>a(,N:. ;
NUCLEAR REEULATORY COMMISSION
(,
e 1
t ~ "[, f REGION IV s
f
%l, %,.?
$11 RYAN PLAZA ORIVE SurTE 1000 l
8 ARLINGTON TEXAS 79011
/
- s,e*
1 May 13. 1986 l
MEMORANDUM FOR:
T.
F.
Westerman, Chief Reactor Safety Pranch FROM:
H.
S.
Ph i l l ) p r.. Scnior Resident I n s p eC 'l or l
Comanche Peel:
,i
}
SUBJECT:
DRAFT REPORTS l
l As requested in your memorandum (encl osed ). I have i ctf%t 111 ec l
substantive differences in the enclosed matrix.
I intend to retoir.
I j
these flies: therefore, I am f orp.ar di ng them to the File rocm as directed 2n Re g i or. IV Folicy Guido 0206. Revi si on O.
l
. f H.
E.
Phi 11ips Senior Resident Inspector Comanche Peak l
l En:1orurer:
1.
West erma i m e m a r 1. ri r.h m,
2.
Matri: ( R $ t y - 16/13) 3.
Documents. subm1tted to 421e ronm cc w/ encl:
Resident File Documents F1)e Room A
g 3
I
/c#
%,9,4 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION A
e
'e E
V 5*
L
[
REGION IV
/
811 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 78011 1
,,,,g May 12, 1986 MATPIX OF DRAFTS FOR REPORT 85-16/13 H.
S. PHILLIPS' Documents:
14 T-Ib Handwritten draft for Ur. i t 2 canztruction inspection.
(Submitted 3rd weet Dec. 1925)
'J a P-2b
~
First revisions per commer et t, or, ia.
F2rst draft of report.
4 Firs.t draft reviewed by management and management writes. In conclusion and directed changes on pages 7,B,12 and 13, Par a.
6 was revised because s.tatus changed.
S a
?, 5b' Second draft and Final draft.- Fi nal incorporates minor revi si ons.
6a Final report is a composite of construction, op er at"i on s, and RIV technical review team f oll owup.
E>: i t Inspector informed TUGCO of viol ations on December 4, 1985.
UEY
- Orioinal Submiss 2on
- Difference
- Mgt directed chance implemented EtJBJECT / PAR AGR APH DOCi!MFtJTj]
COMMENTS iInnnettori 1a 1tt OM b ~
4 Sa Rgppet Cover Pace t
4*
ttt Viol atiens dropped.
Action on 10CFR5n.55(e)
D'H i c 2 enc a es Identified by the ADoli cant / Pare 3.0 a.
TUGCO failed to NA
- 4 Violation dropped.
devel op /i mpl ement a procedure to show or reference ob.)ettive evidence that defi-ciencies were corrected.
Violation of Criterion V " Procedures. Instruc--
tions and Drawings" of 10 CFR Part 50.
Appendi :: B.
(Phil1ips.McClesley findingt Phillips wrote the violation).
Me ye, w&
m
S/12/06
_ SUBJECT / PARAGRAPH DODIMENTS COMMENTS Po 2 (Insp ec t or )
la 2.4 h 4
Sa V
I b.
TUGCO failed to re-NA
- 44 Violation dropped.
vise implementing procedures before corporate NEO Pro-cedure CS-1 was implemented. result-ing in conflict with five other proce-dures.
Violation of Criterion VI " Document Control". (Phillips l
finding and wrote the I
violation.)
c.
TUGCO failed to main-
- tt Viol ation dropped.
tain 50.55(e) files
- 4 l
(OA records) that 4
were retrieveabl e:
1.e, could not pro-duce record in elmest a month.
Violation of Criterion XVII "OA Records". (McCleskev finding: Phillips wrote the violation.)
d.
TUGCO failed to re-
- 44 Violation dropped, port to the NRC:the corrective action actually taken and changes to commitment regarding corrective action reported to NRC. Vi ol ati on 10CFR50.55(e)
(McCleskey. Phillips finding: Phillips wrote i
the violation.)
l o.
TUGCO failed to have Mgt changed findino a procedure. This to a positive state-i violation of Criterion ment about TUGCO V was changed to an action. TUGCO unresolved statement never discussed in 1.a.
(revi si on 4 this commitment para. 3.)
(Phillips) with inspectors i
bef ore this change was made to report.
Insert #1.
5/1C/86 CUBJECT/ PARAGRAPH Df)CUMI.NTE COMMENTS Pg
~
(Inspector) la Tanh 3
4 Sa
/
f.
TUGCO files were not 4
Mgt. dropped p ar a.
auditable with respect and subst2tuted t o correcti ve act 2 on.
para. where TUGCO Violation of 10 CFR admi tted vi ol ati er, Part 50.55(e) and many but was tal:1ng TUGCO letters which action. Insert #1.
stated records avail-able. Changed from vi ol ati on to strong paragraph.
(McCleskey)
{
Apolicant Action en IE Bulletins Para. 4 a.
TUGCO never responded v
Statement dropped.
to all aspects of
- e Unresol ved i tem IEB 79-14. Unresolved dropped per item pending further direction.
revi ew. (McCl est ev, Phill2ps)
- b. TUGCO IEB files for 9
ts*
Statement dropped.
19BC and 1985 did Unresol ved i tem not contai n suf f i-dropped per cient records or ref-direct 2on, erence to records which show IEB act2on/
corrective action complete. Unresolved item. (Phillips.
McCleskey) c.
TUGCO had repl aced
- 4*
Viol ation dropped NAMCO sw2tches per to unresolved.
IEB 79-C8 but C of 14 that were field inspected were not properly identified on i nst al l ati on traveler. Violation of Criterion VIII
" Identification /
control of Materials.
Parts,and Components" (McCleskey, Phillips finding.
Phillips wrote the violatson.)
F.d.
5/12/86
(
-SUB. JECT /FARAGRAPH DOC UMENTS COMMENTS PO 4 I
(!nspector) la 2 ebb 4
5a TUGCO procedures for Mgt. dropped end j
handling IEP are wrote insert #2 are deficient in that in Document #4.
they do not describe i
how construction managte-l ment / personnel handle IEB requiring acti on, j
especi ally hardware l
repair, replacement and modification.
Prior to writeup. I stated to manacement i
i that this i s a vi ol e-tion but mgt.. disagreed and,1 wrote it a ss
)
unresol ved. (*1cC1 ced.ev.
Phillips fi ndi ng )
l
- e. No TUGCO construction t
t tv Mgt. dropped and f
focal po2nt was 4ound wrote insert #2 for tractinq cuch IED in Doc.#4 actions.
Prior to writeup I stated to management that this is a violation but mgt.
'j
^
i disagreed and I wrote it as unresolved.
(McClesley.Phillips) l Action on Previ ou s Inspection Findino Para 2 Failure to properly re-5 4*
The dropping of view design change 1.e.
this violation was DCA 18728. not reviewed coordinated with for impact before sign-T.
Young by ing DCA 29894.
Vi ol a-Messers McCleskey tion dropped.(McCleskey, and Phillips as Phillips) additional infor-mation was found to show compliance.
Mr. Young agreed.
Electrical Penetratic; geals Whole paragraph changed t
11 4*
448 Violation dropped.
after management di-Request for office-rected addi t i onal in-investigation to spection in late Dec.
review also 1985 and after BISCO dropped.
Memo to IE reviewed by RIV Mgt.(T.Youno) i
7 L
\\
l p
Ac i
l l
)
~
l 4
I i
i