ML20237H474
| ML20237H474 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Three Mile Island  |
| Issue date: | 09/08/1986 |
| From: | Russell W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| LRP-A-005B, LRP-A-5B, NUDOCS 8708170229 | |
| Download: ML20237H474 (965) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:-- _ _ _ _ _-5B_ _
- . f)OP H E
\ UNITED STATES b
,y. g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WALHINGTON, D. C. 20666 '
M. "h" 1
- 7. . 38 /
September 20, 1985 jl
**"* '87 AUG 12 A9 :20 I
AJT ' , , DGC W e. .nn \ MEMORANDUM FOR: . Harold R. Denton, Director WM - Office'of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ) FROM: William T. Russell,' Acting Director Division of Human Factors Safety
' Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
STIER REPORT ON TMI-2 LEAK RATE TESTING
. .Beckground As directed by the Comission, NRR has been working with 01 during the past 18 months on investigations of 10 currently licensed operators in order to determine their involvement, if any, in. improper activities associated with leak rate testing at THI-2 prior to the accident. To date, reports have been completed for eight of these individuals and have been forwarded by you to the Director, 01 for his review and possible referral to the Department of Justice. The remaining two reports are scheduled for completion by October 4, 1985.:
During the course of' our work with 01, we have performed a technical evaluation of leak rate tests performed during the last six months of operation of TMI-2. Our test evaluation has been used extensively to question operators and has been the principal basis for our conclusions concerning the involvement these individuals may have had in improper leak rate testing. By letter to you dated September 9, 1985, GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPUN) forwarded a report prepared by Mr. Edwin H. Stier entitled "THI-2 Reactor j Coolant Inventory Balance Testing," (Stier Report). The report addresses i leak rate surveillance. testing at TMI-2 prior to the accident. l 1 The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with my coments concerning the technical evaluation of individual leak rate tests contained in the Stier Report and to compare Stier's results with NRR's evaluation. The enclosed ' report and attachments address areas of agreement and disagreement between our technical evaluations. It does not, however, address Stier's conclusions regarding overall leak rate testing practices or his conclusions on individuals still employed within the GPU system. Summary of Comparison The Stier Report covers the entire one year period during which leak rate tests were performed at THI-2 (222 tests). The NRR evaluation only addressed tests perfomed during the last six months of operation prior to the accident (161 tests). Therefore, for purposes of comparison, only the latter time period is addressed. D O 9 -
- l. . - . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
j
4 a
\
\
= k
% s w%g *-
g,*y gg. ce s, .
~2- September 20, 1985 For the majority of tests (116 or 72%), the Stier and NRR analyses are in complete agreement. For some tests (18 or 11%), both Stier and NRR agree that the tests are invalid but for slightly different reasons. NRR also concluded that several tests (21 or 13%) were invalid while Stier felt that there wad insufficient evidence to reach that conclusion. The reverse occurred for only 6 tests (4%).
The differences in technical evaluation methods utilized by Stier and NRR account for some of these differences. However, the principal difference is that Stier's analysis, performed by MPR Assoc. Inc., did not include feedback from operator interviews. We found that it was necessary to revise and update our evaluation as a result of operator interviews in order te account for methods and techniques used by some operators to manipulate test results. This we believe is the principal reason for our conclusion that several additional tests are invalid. The results of the comparison is shown below. Tests were considered invalid
- if they involved actions which directly violated the TMI-2 Technical -
Specifications, the precautions and limitations of the approved test procedure, or were perfonned with known faulty instrumentation supplying data to the plant computer. In some cases these actions were perfonned by operators with the intent to influence the test results. In other cases, operators unknowingly or negligently performed these actions. For these reasons, not all invalid tests identified in the tables below represent willful manipulation or intentional falsification of test results. OVERALL RESULTS Total Tests NRR Invalid Stier Invalid 161 112 (70%) 97 (60%) INDIVIDUAL RESULTS Name Current Total No. NRR Invalid Stier Invalid License of Tests Tests Tests
*R. R. Bocher Waterford 3 14 12 86% 8 57%
J. R. Congdon TMI-2 28 19 68% 16 57% M. V. Cooper San Onofre 2/3 30 21 70% 16 53% C. C. Faust TMI-2 20 8 40% 11 55% E. R. Frederick TMI-2 25 12 48% 14 56% i C. L. Guthrie TMI-2 19 13 68% 12 63% l T. F. Illjes TMI-2 18 13 72% 13 72% j H. A. McGovern TMI 2 14 10 71% 7 50% l A. W. Miller TMI-2 25 18 72% 17 68% 1
*D. 1. Olson Waterford 3 19 15 79% 13 68% i
- Messrs. Bocher and Olson resigned from Waterford-3 and are no longer licensed effective August 23 and June 28, 1985, respectively.
1 e September 20, 1985 ' Conclusions Based upon our review to date, the technical differences do not appear to be significant to our overall conclusions or our conclusions or recommendations regarding individuals. As a result, we have neither revised our technical evaluation based upon our review of Stier's Report nor discussed these I technical differences with either Stier or GPUN. Our comparison of overall and individual conclusions will be completed in about three weeks. h) $ T,f= O0 L - William T. Russell, Acting Director Division of Human Factors Safety Office of Nuclear Reector Regulation ;
Enclosure:
As Stated l l cc with enclosure: 1 B. Hayes _ G. Cunninghani;{ = cc w/o enclosure: W. Dircks T. Murley, RI R. Martin, RIV J. Martin, RV 1 [ 1
September 20, 1985 4 Enclosure COMPARISON OF NRR'S AND STIER'S TMI-2 LEAK RATE TEST EVALUATIONS Introduction Between September 30, 1978 and March 28, 1979 numerous reactor coolant system leak rate surveillance tests were performed at TMI-2. Of these, 161 surveillance test sheets were retained. Former TMI-2 Control Room Operator (CRO) Harold Hartman alleged that many of these tests were intentionally manipulated by operators in order to produce results within the limits of the TM1-2 Technical Specifications. These test records and other plant data have been reviewed independently by Mr. Edwin Stier, under contract to GPUN, and by NRR. Each review s concentrated on determining whether the tests were performed in accordance - with the approved test procedure. Both evaluations concluded, that over 60% of all tests retained were performed and accepted as valid even though conditions existed which were contrary to the precautions and limitation of the procedure. While these technical evaluations were able to identify test deficiencies or operations performed during the test that were contrary to the requirements of the test procedure, they can not identify whether these actions were done intentionally. The technical evaluation of several tests involved subjective judgement, based upon limited plant data, in reaching a conclusion whether a test was valid or not. In other cases, differences in evaluation methods between NRR and Stier caused differences in results for some tests. The purpose of this document is to summarize where the two technical evaluations agree and were they disagree and to identify the reason for the differences. NRR Evaluation In 1983 and early 1984, a technical analysis of leak rate surveillance tests performed during the last six months of operation of TMI-2 was performed by NRC, Region I. This analysis was done as technical support to the Department of Justice (D0J) in its criminal proceeding against Met-Ed. (Note: Various portions of this analysis were provided to GPUN by DOJ on December 5, 1983 and on February 15, 1984 and are identified as Exhibits 1 and 2 in Volume IV(L) of the Stier Report.) As a result of a Commission meeting on May 23, 1984, NRR was directed to work with OI to determine what role, if any, currently licensed operators had in improper activities associated with leak rate testing at TMI-2. NRR used the material contained in the NRC/D0J analysis as a starting point for its evaluation; however, based upon information obtained during interviews with former TMI-2 CR0s and Shift Foremen, the original NRC/00J test evaluations have been extensively revised. References in the Stier Report to "NRC allegations of manipulation" for individual tests are based upon this NRC/D0J analysis. This report uses the July 30, 1985 NRR evaluation for comparison to the Stier Report. A copy of this evaluation entitled "NRR Evaluation of TMI-2 Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Tests Performed 09/30/78 to 03/28/79," is included as Attachment 5. The reference materials supporting the evaluation, are not included. j
l . Stier Evaluation 1 On September.9. 1985 NRR was provided a copy of the report entitled "TMI-2 Reactor Coolant Inventory Balance Testing." The report, dated September 5, 1985, was prepared for GPUN by Edwin H. Stier. In conducting his investigation, Mr. Stier engaged a Washington, D.C. based engineering firm, MPR, Associates, Incorporated (MPR), to perform the technical analysis of leak rate tests and other plant data. An individual evaluation of each test is provided in the MPR_ report which is included as Volume IV of Stier's Report. Volume 111(A), Table 1 of the Stier Report contains the "Overall Leak Rate Test Summary," which represents Stier's conclusions based upon the MPR analysis. This summary table was used in comparing the results of the HRR and Stier evaluations. Where test evaluation results are different, the MPR repcrt was reviewed in detail to understand the basis for the difference. Test Identification For each test retained, an NRR identification number was assigned chronologically, beginning with test #1 on September 30, 1978. In addition, five tests perf.ormed between October 16 and 18, 1978, indicating unidentified leakage in excess of the TMI-2 Technical Specifications, are numbered 12A through 12E. A total of 161 tests are included in the NRR evaluation. The Stier evaluation included 222 tests during the period March 22, 1978 through March 28, 1979. Stier also assigned a unique sequence number to each test; however tests are listed in reverse chronological order, beginning with test #1 on March 28, 1979. Because our purpose is to compare the two evaluations, only tests retained during the period September 30, 1978 through March 28, 1979 are included in this document.
\
i
Summary of Comparison As will be explained in more detail below, many factors must be considered in determining whether an individual test is valid or invalid. For the majority of tests, the Stier and NRR evaluations are in complete agreement. For some tests, both Stier and NRR agree the tests are invalid but for slightly different reasons. For other tests, NRR considers the test invalid while Stier has evaluated the test as valid, and vice versa. OVERALL
SUMMARY
TOTAL NUMBER OF TESTS 161 1
,NRR AND STIER EVALUATIONS AGREE 116 (72%) ,
- Valid Tests.................. 43
- Invalid Tests................ 73 l l
NRR AND STIER EVALUATIONS DIFFERENT 45(28%)
- Both agree tests are invalid. 17 (slightly different reasons)
- NRR Invalid /Stier Valid...... 21
- Stier Invalid /NRR Valid....... 6
- Not in NRR evaluation......... 1 l
Attachments 1 through 4 of this report provide the following additional information concerning individual leak rate tests: Attachment 1: Identifies the NRR and Stier evaluation category for each of the 161 tests. Attachment 2: Discusses the 17 tests that are considered invalid by both NRR and Stier but for slightly different reasons and the 1 test not included in the NRR evaluation. Attachment 3: Discusses the 21 tests that are considered invalid by NRR but valid by Stier. Attachment 4: Discusses the 6 tests that are considered invalid by Stier but ' valid by NRR. l
4 Summary By Evaluation , Category For ease of comparison, tests have been divided into nine evaluation categorids. These categories come from the NRR evaluation. Depending upon plant conditions, status of key instrumentation, and plant evolutions during the test period, some tests fall into more than one category. The table below identifies the number of tests in the NRR and Stier evaluations which fall into each category. A detailed definition and discussion of each category follows the table. 1 Summary by Evaluation Category NRR Stier Category Number * % Number * %
~
.. No apparent problems (0K) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 31% 66 40%
Bad level transmitter or instrument used (LT).. 42 26% 41 25% Water addition (not included)(WAN) .. .. ..... . . .. 22 14% 5 3% Water addition (partially included)(WAP)....... 17 11% 22 14% Feed & bleed operation (F&B)................... 15 9% 9 6% Hydrogen addition (H).......................... 12 7% 14 9% Unstable plant conditions (USPC)............... 10 6% 11 7% Water or hydrogen (can not differentiate)(WorH). 7 4% 0 0% Results greater than TS limit (1GPM)............ 6 4% 6 4%
- Note: NRR figures include 14 tests that fall into two categories and 3 tests that fall irto three categcries.
Stier figures includes 12 tests that fall into two categories. Code Discussion of Evaluation Category OK Test appears to have been conducted in accordance with the requirements of Surveillance Procedure 2301-3D1, "RC System Inventory." The surveillance test sheet, CR0's and Shift Foreman's Logs, and makeup tank strip chart have no unusual characteristics or features that call into question the validity of the test. In addition, the actual change in MUT level during the test was consistent with the expected l change caused by differences in pressurizer level (Lp) and average RCS temperature (Tave) during the test. USPC Test was conducted during unstable plant conditions (not in steady state). SP 2301-3D1 directs that the test be performed at least once per 72 hours during steady state operation when in Modes 1 through
- 4. The procedure cautions the operator to maintain the reactor cooli..t
5-System (RCS) and makeup system in a steady state condition during the test by avoiding changes in valve line-ups, coolers-in-service, pumps-in-service, etc. Power level changes should be minimized and the operator should avoid additions or removal of water from the RCS and makeup system during the test. For the most accurate detennination of RCS leak rate, the initial and final conditions of reactor power, RCS temperature, pressure and pressurizer level should be identical. LT Unstable or out-of-service instrument or MUT level transmitter was used to provide input to the plant computer during the test. At TMI-2 there are two level transmitters (LT-1 and LT-2) that provide MUT level indication. The output of one of the level transmitters drives the MUT level strip chart in the control room while the other level transmitter provides MUT level indication to the plant computer. When the selector switch was positioned to LT-1, the strip chart recorder would be driven by the output of LT-1 and LT-2 would provide automatic input to the
, plant computer. When the selector switch was changed to LT-2, the -
opposite would occur. All but one of the retained leak rate tests during this period at TMI-2 were conducted using the plant computer. MUT level is one of the key plant parameters used in the leak rate calculation. During portions of October 1978 through January 1979, operators at TMI-2 experienced significant problems with either one or l both level transmitters. In many cases, the output of one level transmitter was so erratic, that the output could not be relied upon to provide meaningful input to the plant computer to calculate test results. H Tests during which hydrogen was added to the MUT. In order to limit the oxygen content in the RCS and to provide an increased net positive suction head for the RCS makeup pumps, a hydrogen overpressure was maintained in the MUT. When hydrogen pressure decreased near the low end of the operating band, the CR0 would add hydrogen to the tank. Theoretically, the addition of hydrogen should not have affected MUT level; however, because of the design of the MUT level detection instrumentation system at THI-2, water could collect in the low-pressure (dry) reference leg of the level transmitters. Under this condition, the resultant water slug or " loop seal" could cause a ! temporary increase in the MUT indicated level without actually adding water to the tank. Thus, the addition of hydrogen at the appropriate time (after the computer collected its initial data and before the final data were taken) could affect the leak rate results in a l nonconservative manner (e.g., the calculated leak rate would be less j than the actual leak rate). According to Hartman, this "cause and j effect" relationship was connon knowledge among operators. Hartman and ' four other CR0s have admitted adding hydrogen to the MUT during leak rate tests to influence the outcome of the test. This method may have been used more times than are reflected in the analyses. First, hydrogen would only have an affect only if sufficient water were present to form a loop seal. Second, water might collect in the reference leg of one LT and not the other. Thus, causing one LT to - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _______-_-_ _________ ____-__-____ a
react to the addition and have no affect on the other LT. Third, i hydrogen additions were not always logged, or if logged were not always f logged at the time the addition was made. Thus, identifying the addition of hydrogen on the MUT strip chart is difficult. i WAN Water additions were made to the MUT during the test and not included in the leak rate test calculation. SP 2301-3D1 instructs the operator to avoid the addition and removal of water from the RCS and makeup l system during the test; however, if the inventory must be changed, it must be accounted for by including the amount of water added in the test calculation. Normally water is added to the MUT in a manner that is easily detectable on the MUT strip chart (batch addition). If however, water is added in small quantities over a period of time (jogged addition), the water addition may be masked by noreal oscillations on the MUT strip chart.
- According to Hartman, jogged additions were made to the RCS during the' performance of leak rate tests and the amount of water added was not included in the test calculation in order to influence or manipulate the outcome of the test result. Both the NRR and Stier evaluations ;
identify batch water additions that were not included in the calculation. The NRR evaluation also identifies possible jogged water k additions. Stier does not identify jogged water additions in his [ evaluation. l WAP Water additions were made to the MUT during the test and were included ( in the leak rate test calculation; however, because of two factors the test results showed lower leakage than would otherwise be the case ( without the water addition. The first factor was a error in the test procedure itself. SP 2301-3D1 did not convert the water added to the same temperature as the RCS. As { a result, tha water added to the MUT was " undervalued" and tended to l reduce the total and unidentified leak rate as calculated in the test. j (Note: Thi.s error was only one of several that contributed to inaccurate results.) The second factor involved MUT level instrument errors. Because adding I water to the MUT compresses the hydrogen gas in the top of the MUT, f water additions to the tank shortly before the computer obtained its i final data set could have the same result as a hydrogen addition. If i an operator were aware of this "cause and effect" relationship, he ; could take advantage of this phenomenon to manipulate test results by following the procedure exactly as written. For example, the addition of 150 gallons of water to the MUT during the last 10 minutes of a leak k rate test should cause the MUT level to increase approximately 5 inches (30 gal / inch); however, if sufficient water had collected in the loop seal, the indicated level on the MUT strip chart might actually a increase 6 inches (180 gal). Once the final data were read by the computer, including the 6 inch rise in MUT level, the operator would ! enter the 150 gallon water addition (as read off the totalizer on the batch controller) into the computer as an operator-cause change. Thus, ll
when the computer calculated the total and unidentified leak rate, the i results would be 0.5 gpm less than the actual leak rate [(180 gal - 150 ' gal)/60 minutes]. Note: While operators used 30 gal /in as a rule of thumb, the actual value was approximately 30.8 gal /in at normal MUT conditions. NRR does not believe that operators were aware of the procedural error in the calculation; however, based upon the testimony of one CRO, who , was aware of the MUT level instrument inaccuracy and used this I mechanism to influence leak rate tests, others may also have been aware of the phenomenon and used it to their advantage. The NRR and Stier evaluation of tests in this category differ to some ! degree. Stier considers the effect of both the calculational error and l and MUT instrument error in his evaluation. Stier classifies these tests as " water additions included in the calculation." In addition,
-- Stier used a different method ("MUT slope off-set) than NRR to arrive -
at a figure for the amount of water added during the test. While either method should produce the same result during periods of low leakage, the Stier method is more accurate during periods of high leakage. NRR used the " peak-to-peak" change in MUT level indiction (assuming 30 gal / inch) to determine the amount added. This method was used by NRR in calculating water additions since some operators stated they used this method to confirm the amount of water added. During periods of high leakage, the NRR method actually underestimates the amount of water added since it does not account for the water leakage during the addition period. F&B Identifies tests during which feed and bleed operations may have occurred. Feed and bleed operations were used routinely to increase or decrease the boron concentration of in the RCS. Based upon the limits and precautions of SP 2301-301, feed and bleed operations should not have been conducted during leak rate tests. Feed and bleed operations, like many others in the plant, do not always have a distinctive trace on the MUT strip chart. At times water was added (feed) and then removed (bleed) from the RCS in that order or the reverse order. Since water could also be added and removed from the system at the same time, these operations might be undetectable on the strip chart if the rate of addition and removal were equal and the operation was not logged in the CRO's Log. While feed and bleed operations could be used to used to manipulate test results, none of the operators interviewed by NRR have admitted using this method. WorH This category only appears in the NRR analysis. NRR believes that tests in this category may have been altered by either a hydrogen addition or a jogged water addition; however, based upon the similarity in MUT level traces that could be produced by either of these operations, it was not possible to determine which was more probable.
~
1GPM The six tests in this category all occurred between October 16 and 18, 1978. Each of these tests showed results greater than the technical specification limit for unidentified leakage. Five tests (12A-12E) were not signed (except 12B) by the CR0s performing the tests and were not approved by their Shift Foremen. Test 13 was not signed by a CRO,
f.: 1 I instead the Shift Foreman signed as the operator and the Shift-Supervisor approved the test. These tests were associated with an incident th6t occurred on October 18,.1978 resulting in the submission of LER 78-62/1T by Met-Ed on November 1,1978. . Conclusions Based'upon NRR's review to date, the' technical differences do not appear to I be significant to our overall conclusions or our conclusions or l recommendations regarding individuals. As a result, we have not revised our technical evaluation based upon our review of the Stier Report. 1 6 a i l l I
Attachment 1 NRR AND STIER EVALUATION CATEGORY FOR EACH TMI-2 LEAK RATE SURVEILLANCE TEST I PERFORMED BETWEEN 09/30/78 AND 03/28/79 NRR TEST EVALUATION STIER TEST EVALUATION No. Evaluation No. Evaluation SEPTEMBER 1978 1 1 OK 161 , OK OCTOBER 1978 2 OK 160 OK 3 OK 159 OK 4 OK 158 OK 5 OK 157 OK
*6 F&B s 156* OK ~
s *7- F&B 155* OK 8 OK 154 OK
*9 USPC 153* USPC/Poss F&B 10 USPC 152 USPC 11 OK 151 OK 12 WAN/Poss F&B 150 WAN/F&B 12A 1GPM 149 1GPM 12B 1GPM 148 1GPM 12C 1GPM 147 1GPM 120 1GPM 146 1GPM
*12E 1GPM/F&B 145* 1GPM 13 1GPM 144 1GPM
*14 WAN 143* OK 15 OK 142 OK.
16 OK 141 OK 17 H 140 H
*18 WAN 139* USPC 19 OK 138 OK 20 OK 137 OK 21 OK 136 OK 22 OK 135 OK 23 H 134 H :
*24 WAN 133* OK 25 OK(NoSurveillancesheet) ---
*26 OK 132* USPC l 27 USPC 131 USPC
*28 WAN/USPC 130* USPC 29 F&B/USPC 129 USPC/Poss F&B 30 OK 128 OK 31 LT/USPC 127 LT/USPC
- Identifies tests evaluated differently by NRR and Stier.
** For tests evaluated as WAP, the first number in parentheses is the time in minutes before the end of the leak rate test that water was added and the second number is the difference in gallons between the amount included in the calculation and the amount shown on the MUT strip chart (NRR using " peak-to-peak" and Stier using " slope off-set).
r. NRR TEST EVALUATION STIER TEST EVALUATION No. Evaluation No. Evaluation 3 NOVEMBER 1978 - 32 OK 126 OK 33 LT 125 LT 34 LT 124 LT 35 LT 123 LT
*36 LT/H/WAN 122* LT/H' 37- LT 121 LT 38 OK 120 OK 39 H 119 H 40 USPC -118 USPC 41- Th Inst 117 Th Inst DECEMBER 1978 42 OK (No trace on strip chart) 116 OK (Strip chart pen out of ink)
~
s 43 LT/F&B 115 Poss LT/Poss F&B 44 LT 114 Poss LT
'45 LT 113 Poss LT 46 OK 112 OK 47 LT 111 LT- 1 48 LT 110 LT 49 OK -109 OK -
*50 LT/WAN 108* OK (MUT oscillations evident) 51 LT 107 LT-52 LT 106 LT I 53 LT 105 LT 54 OK 104 OK 55 OK 103 OK
$56 LT/WAN 102* LT 57 OK 101 OK 58 LT/F&B 100 LT/Poss F&B 59 LT 99 LT 60 OK 98 OK 61 LT 97 LT
*62 WorH 96* OK 63 H 95 H 64 LT 94 LT 65~ OK 93 OK 66 LT 92 LT 67 OK 91 OK
*68 .0K 90* LT
*69 LT/H 89* LT 70 LT/USPC 88 LT/USPC 71 LT/WAN 87 LT/WAN
*72 LT/WAN/F&B 86* LT 73 LT 85 LT 74 LT 84 LT 75 LT 83 LT 76 LT - 82 LT
*77 LT/WAN/USPC 81* -LT/USPC
*78 WAN 80* OK 79 OK 79 OK 80 LT 78 LT 81 OK 77 OK 82 LT 76 LT
NRR TEST EVALUATION STIER TEST EVALUATION No. Evaluation No. Evaluation 8 JANUARY 1979 83 LT 75 LT 84 LT 74 LT 85 LT 73 LT 86 LT 72 LT
*87 LT/WorH 71* LT 88 OK 70 OK 89 OK 6S OK 90 LT 68 LT 91 LT 67 LT
*92 LT/WAN 66* LT 93 WAP (23 min-40 gal)** 65* WAP (23 min-9 gal)**
94 WAN 64 WAN
- 95 OK 63 OK l
*96 LT 62* OK (MUT levels do not match) l FEBRUARY 1979
*97 F&B 61* OK (Poss F&B or mislogged entry)
*98 WAN 60* OK 99 OK 59 OK 100 OK 58 OK 101 OK 57 OK 102 OK 56 OK 103 OK 55 OK 104 OK 54 OK 105 OK 53 OK 106 F&B 52 Poss F&B 107 OK 51 OK
*108 USPC 50* OK 109 OK 49 OK
*110 F&B 48* OK
*111 F&B 47* OK
*112 F&B 46* OK (Unusual dip in trace) 113 OK 45 OK 114 WAN 44 WAN (Poss F&B) 115 WAN 43 WAN 116 OK 42 OK 117 OK 41 OK
*118 OK (30 min-4 gal)** 40* WAP (30 min-25 gal)**
119 H 39 H 120 H 38 H
*121 WorH 37* OK 122 WAP (13 min-24 gal)** 36 WAP (8 min-12 gal)**
123 H 35 H 124 H 34 Poss H
*125 WorH 33 Poss H
*126 WorH 32 Poss H 127 OK- 31 OK 128 F&B 30 Poss F&B 129 WAP (4 min-50 gal)** 29 WAP (4 min-59 gal)**
*130 WorH 28* OK 131 WAP (17 min-26 gal)** 27 WAP (4 min-31 gal)**
*132 F&B 26* WAP (3 min-10 gal)**
133 WAP (4 min-50 gal)** 25 WAP (4 min-23 gal)**
r-I NRR TEST EVALUATION STIER EVALUATION i l No. Evaluation No. Evaluation j
' MARCH 1979 d 134 H 24 H
*135 WAN 23* OK
*136 WorH 22* OK i 137 WAP (3 min-48 gal)** 21 WAP (3 min-128 gel)** i 138 WAP 2 min-32 gal)** 20 WAP (2 min-70 gal)** I 139 WAP 10 min-182 gal)** 19 WAP (10 min-94 gal)** l 140 WAP 1 min-30 gal)~** 18 WAP 1 min-113 ga )** ;
*141 WAP/F&B (3 min-22 gal)** 17* WAP 3 min-33 gal ** j 142 WAP (8 min-59 gal)** 16 WAP 8 min-35 gal ** i
*143 WAN 15* OK j
*144 WAN 14* OK i
*145 WAN 13* OK t
. 146 WAP (5 min-25 gal)** 12 WAP (5 min-126 gal)** -
*147 WAP (15 min-100 gal)** 11* WAP/Poss F&B (15 min-193 gal)**
*148 WAN 10' Poss H 149 WAP (19 min-36 gal)** 9 WAP (19 min-39 gal)**
150 WAP (24 min-33 gal)** 8 WAP (25 min-8 gal)** 151 WAP (1 min -130 gal)** 7 WAP (6 min-82 gal)** 152 H (48 min-3 gal-0K)** 6 H 48 min- -19 gal-0K)** i 153 WAP (7 min -100 gal)** 5 , WAP 7 min -31 gal)** !
*154 OK (10 min--6 gal-0K)** 4* WAP 20 min-71 gal)**
*155 OK (17 min- -1 gal-0K)** 3* WAP (17 min-69 gal)**
*--- No Test 2* WAP/Poss F88 (22 min-86 (49 min -51 gal)**gal)**
*156 OK (49 min-17 gal-OK)** 1* WAP ,
Identifies tests evaluated differently by NRR and Stier. t
** For tests evaluated as WAP. the first number in parentheses is the time in minutes before the end of the leak rate test that water was added !
and the second number is the difference in gallons between the amount ! included in the calculation and the amount shown on the MUT strip chart (NRR using " peak-to-peak" and Stier using " slope off-set). No apparent problems LT Bad level transmitter or instrument used during test ! WAN Watar addition (not included in test) WAP Water addition (partially included in test due to instrument error) F&B Feed and bleed operation durina test H Hydrogen addition USPC Unstable plant conditions WorH Water or hydrogen addition (unable to differentiate) 1GPM Results greater than TS limit 4 I
I Attachment 2 COMPARISO/4 0F TMI-2 LEAK RATE TESTS WITH DIFFERENT EVALVATION RESULTS.BY NRR ! AND E. STIER LOTH AGREE TESTS ARE INVALID BUT FOR DIFFERENT REASONS g STIER COMMENTS
#9 USPC #153 USPC Chart times agree. Plant definitely unstable.
.F&B7 NRR agrees with possible F&B.
1
#12E 1GPM #145 1GPM Chart times agree. Both agree that results for 4 F&B7 unidentified leakage (1.32 gpm) exceeds TS limit f and was rounded off to 1 gpm. NRR believes 1 possible F&B at 0640 with approximately 40 more . l gal added to the system than removed. Stier
]
considers trace deflection similar to others i during the day. NRR considers 0640 MUT trace the d same as the one at 1915 which Stier classifies as { possible F&B. I 1
#18 WAN #139 USPC Chart times agree within 1 min. Stier considers )
test invalid due to large change in Lp during !' test (+7"). NRR agrees; however, MUT level does not decrease as much as expected due to leakage and changes in Lp and Tave. In addition, MUT trace indicates a possible 50 gal of boric acid at 1258. Trace is the same as logged additions of boric acid at 0700, 0730, 0830, 1125, and 1209. All but 1209 addition were 50 gal. The 1209 addition was 100 gal.
#28 USPC #130 USPC Chart times agree. Both agree test invalid due to l WAN large oscillations in MUT and Lp, NRR does not agree, however, that 330 gal ddition was not made in test period because of time change from DST to EST. Computer time had to have been reset along with clocks and strip chart since MUT level during i test only matches EST.
#36 LT #122 LT Chart times agree within 3 mins. Both agree LT H H bad and H addition. From strip chart it appears l WAN approximately 150 gal of 500 gal addition stated at 2210 was added during the leak rate test. The ,
addition is not discussed in Stier evaluation.
#56 LT . #102 LT Chart times agree. NRR agrees with Stier that the WAN rise in MUT level could be caused by bad LT alone without water addition.
#69 H #89 LT Chart times agree. NRR believes either H addition LT? or possible switch of LT near end of test. Stier believes bad LT, not H addition.
l
I 1I f l l 1 NRR STIER COMMENTS l l l
#72 LT #86 LT Chart times agree. NRR agrees unstable LT on !
computer. It also appears approximately 100 gal WAN8 l USPC of water may have been added as part of a F&B i operation which commenced approximately 11 mins before end of test (0015) based on change in slope of MUT and large number of F&B operations around test. Only LT problem discussed in Stier i evaluation. I
#77 LT #81 LT Chart times off by 22 mins. NRR agrees unstable USPC USPC LT and USPC; however, based upon changes in Tave, WAN Lp and MUT level, it also appears small addition of 20-30 gal may have taken place during test.
#87 LT #71 LT Chart times agree. Both agree unstable LT used -
WorH for test. There is a marked change in slope of . MUT level approximately 15 min before end of test l which is not discussed in Stier evaluation. l l
#92 LT #66 LT Chart times off by 5 mins. Both agree unstable LT j WAN us'ed for test. Stier says trace at 0218 not j characteristic of batch addition. NRR sgrees; '
however, MUT level slope is off-set by 5" (150 gal) between beginning and end of test.
#125 WorH #33 H? Chart times agree. Agree with Stier that H addition possible. Jogged water addition less probable. Stier's conclusion is supported by operator testimony.
#126 WorH #32 H? Same coments as test #125.
#132 F&B #26 WAP Chart times off by 15 mins. Test appears to be started during F&B with 122 gal being bled and 210 gal being added. The leak rate calculation included 162 gal. Thus, more water (48 gal) was
~
included in the calculation than reflected on the strip chart. Stier does not discuss possible feed and bleed; however, Stier concludes if water addition not m6ds during test, the unidentified leak rate would have been = 2.264 gpm.
#141 WAP #17 WAP Chart times agree. Both agree that rise in MUT by F&B addition 3 min before end of test is higher than amount logged (due to instrument error). However, it appears test was begun during F&B operation.
F&B is not discussed in Stier evaluation.
#147 WAP #11 WAP Chart times agree. Analyses the same except Stier F&B? believes second addition during test is part of F&B Operation. NRR agrees.
E STIER COMMENTS
#148 WAN #10 H7 Chart times agree. Stier confirms MUT tank level 8
is effected during test, but believes it could be a possible H addition. Not logged. Performed by i Hartman's shift. Either H or jogged addition would be censistent with his testimony.
---- #2 WAP NRR did not have this leak. rate test thus, it was F&B not evaluated. Stier. analysis appears correct.
Test begun during an unlogged F&B. During the F&B about 180 gal of water was added and not accounted for in the test calculation. In addition a 300 gal water addition was logged 22 mins before end of i
, test. MUT level indication shows 350 gal. Only s 300 gal included in calculation. Stier used slope off-set to arrive at 386 gal added during test.
)
)
1
l I Attachment 3 i COMPARIS0N OF TMI-2 LEAK RATE TESTS WITH DIFFERENT EVALUATION RESULTS BY NRR J i AND E. STIER NRR EVALUATED TEST AS INVALID /STIER EVALUATED TEST AS VALID NR STIER COMMENTS
#6 F&B #156 OK Chart time off between NRR and Stier by 3 hrs and 27 mins. MUT chart error is large and rapidly changing. Few additions to use for reference.
Both analyses have uncertain of chart time. If chart timing error on part of NRR, F&B may not be , i during test. I
#7 F&B #155 OK Chart times agree. F&B appears on chart used by -
Stier, but is not discussed in his evaluation. 1
#14 WAN #143 OK Chart times agree. Stier says MUT deflections i typical. NRR-agrees MUT trace does not reflect batch addition; however, based upon expected change in MUT level due to changes in Lp and Tave, ,
approximately 100 gal may have been added during I leak rate test.
#24 WAN #133 OK Chart times off by 17 mins; however, addition in question is within the test period for both evaluations. NRR believes MUT trace at 1213 (60 gal) addition is exactly the same as the 25 gal additions logged in CR0's Log at 1800, 1830 and 2116. Addition is not discussed in Stier's !
evaluation.
#50 LT #108 OK Chart times agree. Stier states good transmitter WAN used for test and MUT fluctuations normal. NRR does not agree. MUT strip chart off-set by 2" during test caused by switch of LT shortly after start of test and/or jogged water addition of 60 gals. LTs switched 2010 & 2130 chart time.
#62 WorH #96 OK Chart times agree. Stier states because bad transmitter was on strip chart, MUT level chart can not be used to confirm addition; however, the unusual trace apparent between 0630 and 0640 4 (chart time), interrupting consistent LT-2 trace, is not discussed in Stier evaluation.
#78 WAN #80 OK Chart times. agree within 1 min. Stier says MUT trace fluctuates too much to confirm water addition. MUT should have decreased 2" during test. Instead level increased .67". The change in Tave and Lp do not account for net difference.
NRR believes possible 50 gal addition during test.
y a 1
#96 LT #62 OK Chart times disagree by 1.5 hours. Both analyses have chart time uncertainties due to plant shutdown, new MUT chart roll and few good
' reference marks. NRR evaluated as LT due to.
difference between LT-1 and LT-2 of approximately ! 6" during test. Stier notes that MUT levels do not match well (2") but considers test normal.
#97 F&B #61 OK Chart times agree. Water addition of 300 gal logged in CR0's Log at 0100 but addition is not evident on MUT strip chart. NRR believes addition '
ray have been part of a FSB operation. Stier i utes possible P&B or logging error on test evaluation sheet but apparently considers test normal Overall Leak Rate Summary, (Vol III(A), Table 1). .
#98 WAN #60 OK Chart times agree. MUT level increases by .2" !
duiing test, while NRR calculates that it should ha\e decreased 3.5". The slope of MUT level is off-set near end of test. Stier believes this is ! caused by starting on low point of MUT level fluctuation and stopping on high point in fluctuation.
#108 USPC #50 OK Chart times agree. NRR believes USPC caused large changes in MUT level indication during middle of test, caused either by power level changes or F&B.
Stier believes traces are typical of the day. j i
#110 F&B #48 OK Chart titres off by 5 mins. Possible F&B operation 1 near start of test. May have had small effect.
This fluctuation can be seen on MUT strip chart but is not discussed in Stier evaluation.
#111 F&B #47 OK Chart times off by 10 mins. NRR believes test was started during F&B operation. Stier shows test starting after F&B. NRR used strip chart error of 1 hr 30 min. Stier uses I hr 40 min. l
#112 F&B #46 OK Chart tias off by 5 mins. Possible F&B operation '
near middle of test. Amount appears equal and may not have affected test. Stier notes unusual dip in trace during test but apparently does not consider it a F&B operation.
#121 H #37 OK Chart times'cfT by 1 min. NRR believes Possible H addition. MUT level trace extibits the same characteristics as test #120, which was a confirmed :
H addition. Stier believes trace fluctuations are typical of the day.
#130 WorH #28 OK Chart times off by 10 mins. Possible WorH addition based on change in slope of MUT during test compared with period just prior and just after test. Stier believes trace flattening is similar to patterns before and after the test and thus, are not unusual.
l
1 3- ,
, , yl w ,
q NRR STIER . d h4ENTS N "- .
~
#135 WAN #23 '0K-g x Chart times agree. NRR believes possible small y p I jogged water addition based on change in slope of MUT. -Stier believes flattening similar to other 4- peri M s during the day and are got unusual. NRR g
\ agrees that trace is similab,'but sinWthe times i' of discarded leak rate tests are unknown, leak-rate tests could have beentrun'during periods ,
where similar flattening'cicurs, 3- 4
#136 WorH #22 OK Chart times agree. NRR be'.ieves possible jogged i water addition or H addition due to 3" rise in MUT i level near end of test.' Stier believes trace is similar to others that day. NRR disagrees because y trace does not return expected level following s fluctuation. *
#143 WAN #15 OK Chart times agree. Jogged water addition
'f'8C o Mal beginning before en Aof test. Stier s; believes trace similar to otherstimes of day. NRR
~
,' does not agree. The trace remains approximately J 2.5" above expected slope. Tese was performed by i Hartman's shift. A jogged wat u addition would be consistent with Hartman's testimony.
#144 WAN #14 OK Chart times disagree by 20 mins. Jogged water addition of 100 gal bbginning in middle of test. - ,
Stier believss trace is typical of normal i fluctuations and can not confirm jogged Test was performed by Hartman's' shift. Jogged addition. l '1 i additions on this shift would be cons _ stent with ilartman's testimony. The Stier analysis notes indicate that the test may have begun before completing a 300 gal addition that was started l just prior to the beginning of the test (the portion added 60 approximately during)the gal . test would be
#145 WAN #13 OK Chart times disagree by 5 mins. Jogged water ,,
addition near end of test. Stier believes trace is typical and can not confirm jogged addition. Test performed by Hartman's shift. A jogged , I addition would be consistent with his testimony. s
\
s l - 9
\ r s
r l e Attachment 4 ( COMPARISON OF TMI-2 LEAK RATE TESTS WITH DIFFERENT EVALUATION RESULTS BY NRR
, AND E. STIER STIER EVALUATED TEST AS INVALID /NRR EVALUATED TEST AS VALID R
N_RR STIER COMMENTS
\
#26 OK #132 USPC Chart times agree within 2 mins. Stier notes
, Large increase in Lp during test which accounts for higher than expected slope for MUT. NRR agrees changes may have affected test; however, change in Lp is 5.3" vice 7.3" used in Stier evaluation. MUT level decrease is consistent with
, changes in Tave and tp during test. -
#68 -)K #90 LT Hand calculation performed on 12/19/78 with data from 1815-1917 on 12/18/78. NRR agrees that source of data most likely from computer since form "DS-1" was used to record data. At 1815-1917 on 12/18/78 unstable LT-1 was providing input to computer. Source of data was not noted by NRR for this test.
a #118 OK #40 WAP Chart times agree. Unlogged water addition during middle of test. NRR used " peak to peak" method to calculate 210 gal addition. The calculation included 206 gal or (4 gal error). Stier used
" slope off set" to calculate 231 gal addition (25 gal error). With no water addition, Stier calculated unidentified leakage would be 1.7 gpm.
s ,
#154 OK #4 WAP Chart times agree. Test contains two 100 gal water additions logged at 40 mins and 10 mins before end of test. The last addition may be mislogged. It appears be have been added 20 mins prior to end of test. Leak rate test calculation included 206 gal 1 or 6 gal more than added. Rise in MUT level indication agrees with logged amount. Stier used slope off-set to arrive at 277 gal added. NRR does not agree with slope off-set for this test since slopes are greater during test than prior to or after test. Without this water addition Stier calculated unidentified leakage would be 3.19 gpm.
#155 OK #3 W4P Chart times off by 3 mins. Test contains 300 gal water addition logged 40 mins before end of test.
Leak rate test calculation includes 301 gal or 1 gal more than added. Rise in MUT level indication agrees with logged amount. Stier used slope i off-set to arrive at 370 gal added. NRR agrees in this case that slope off-set method better accounts for leakage during time of 300 gal addition since leakage was 8.5 gpm and addition took approximately 5 min. j
NRR STIER COMMENTS
#156 OK #1 WAP Chart times off by 5 mins. MUT level rise shows ,
i 320 gal water addition. Logged as 300 gal- 1 addition 11 minutes after start of test. Leak rate calculation includes 303 gal or 17 gal less
'than MUT indication. Stier used slope off-set to arrive at 354 gal added during test. NRR agrees
~
for the same reason as discussed in Test #155 above. O 1 ll
. Attachment 5 Updated: 07/30/85 NRR EVALUATION OF TMI-2 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM LEAK RATE TESTS
, PERFORMED 09/30/78 TO 03/28/79 BACKGROUND On March 23, 1984, the Comission directed NRR to review 01 investigative materials concerning falsification of reactor coolant system leak rate surveillance tests at TMI-2 and refer back to 01 those matters which required further investigation. As a result of that review, NRR determined that follow-up investigation by OI and further evaluation by NRR was needed in the case of 10 currently licensed operators.
A joint 01/,NRR investigation and evaluation of these operators is undenvay to
, determine whether their current licenses should be revoked, modified or -
suspended under 10 CFR 55.40 or other enforcement action taken under 10 CFR 55.50, due to their possible involvement in preaccident leak rete testing irregularities at TMI-2. PURPOSES The purposes of this evaluation are: (1)toprovidethenecessarybackground material to support the joint 01/NRR investigative interviews of the operators under investigation; and (2) to serve as a technical basis for judging the credibility of answers provided by these individuals concerning their involvement in or knowledge of preaccident leak rate testing irregularities at TMI-2. CONTENT During the period September 30, 1978 to March 28, 1979, 161 leak rate surveillance test records were retained by the licensee. Each of these tests was studied in detail to determine: (1)whichindividualswereinvolvedin each test and (2) whether evolutions occurred during these tests that were contrary to procedural requirements. The results of this review and evaluation are sumarized in the enclosed 11 tables as follows: Table No. Description 1 Involved Individuals 2 Days Tests Were Required 3 Tests By Time Of Day And Frequency Per Day 4 Tests By Month ' 5 Questionable Tests By Shift And By Supervisor / Operator 6 Overall Evaluation Of High Leakage Period By Shift 7 Overall Evaluation of High Leakage Period By Individual 8 Test Index For Individual Operators 9 Test Approval Index For Shift Foremen / Supervisors 10 Leak Rate Tests By Evaluation Category 11 Individual Test Synopsis
REFERENCE MATERIAL In performing this evaluation, raw plant data and infonnation from previously i issued neports and analyses on leak rate testing practices at TM!-1/2 were used. The plant data and other reports relied upon in preparing the i evaluation include: j
- 1. Computer and hand-generated reactor coolant system leak rate I surveillance test sheets;
- 2. The Control Room Operator's Log;
- 3. The Shift Foreman's Log; 4 Make-up Tank Level Recorder Strip Chart;
_ 5.. Joint O!/NRR interviews, conducted between September 1984 and June 1985, of 15 former Shift Foremen and Control Room Operators at TMI-2; i
- 6. August 15, 1984 Office of Investigations Report 1-83-010. "TMI-2 Alleged Falsification of Leak Rate Surveillance Test Data;"
- 7. June 13, 1894 Report "TMI-1 Reactor Coolant Inventory Balance Testing "
prepared for GPUN by E. H. Stier (Stier Report);
- 8. April 16, 1984 Office of Investigations Report 1-83-028, "TMI-1 Possible f' Falsification of Reactor Coolant System Inventory Leak Rate Tests;"
- 9. February 1984 NRC Region I Technical Analysis of TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests, (Chung Analysis);
- 10. June 6, 1983 Memorandum from T. T. Martin (Region I) to H. H. E. Plaine with attached exhibits.
Subject:
Hartman Allegation Sumary; I
- 11. September 1980 "Results of Faegre & Benson Investigation of Allegations By Harold W. Hartman, Jr. Concerning Three Mile Island Unit 2," (Faegre &
Benson Report). The reference material identified above is located in Room 5201 of the Air Rights !!! Building, under the custody of W. T. Russell, Acting Director, Division of Human Factors Safety, NRR. UPDATE OF INFORMATION As noted in the " Background" section of this report, NRR's initial involvement in this evaluation began in March 1984. As new information has been learned it has been incorporated in the evaluation and the tables updated accordingly. The date of the latest revision is contained in the upper right corner of each table. CONTACT W.T. Russell, DHFS, NRR (X24803) R.A.Capra,DHFS,NRR(X24821) l
Table 1 Updated: 07/30/85 l Involved Individuals l ( PRESENT STATUS OF FORMER SHIFT SUPERVISORS, SHIFT FOREMEN & CONTROL ROOM OPERATORS 4 AT TMI-2 DURING THE PERIOD 09/30/78 TO 03/28/79 l 1 INDIVIDUALS STILL LICENSED
-Name Fomer Position / Shift Present Position A. W. Miller Shift Foreman D Manager, Plant Operations TMI-2 Shift Foreman Foreman, Radwaste Operations THI-2 C.,L. Guthrie-F J
~
CR0 F Plant Operations Manager TMI H. A. McGovern T. F. 111jes CR0 B Shift Supervisor TMI-2 i J. R. Congdon CR0 C Shift Foreman TMI-2 A InstructorVTMI(Corporate)' E. R. Frederick CR0 C. C. Faust CR0 A Instructor III TMI M. S. Coleman CR0 D Instructor III TMI j D Control Rooni Supervisor Waterford 3 D. I. Olson CR0 Control Room Supervisor Waterford 3 R. R. Booher CR0 E M. V. Cooper CR0 C Control Room Supervisor San Onofre 2/3 INDIVIDUALS NO LONGER LICENSED Name Former Positinn/ Shift Present Position Shift Supervisor C Radwaste Operations Manager TMI-1 B. A. Mehler Radwaste Operations Manager TMI-2 B. G. Smith Shift Supervisor E W. H. Zewe Shift Supervisor A Superintendent, Titus Station Shift Foreman B - Radwaste Support Manager TMI-2 ( W. T. Conaway l Shift Foreman C Safety Review Engineer THI-2 C. D. Adams Radiation Area Recovery Supervisor K. R. Hoyt Shift Foreman E TMI-2 J. J. Chwastyk Shift Supervisor B Real Estate Broker Shift Supervisor D General Physics G. R. Hitz Self-Employed K. P. Bryan Shift Supervisor F F. J. Scheimann Shift Foreman A Energy Consultants Inc. B Unknown J. M. Kidwell CR0 Bechtel, Inc. C. F. Mell CR0(Trainee) B M. D. Phillippe CR0 (Trainee) C Quality Assurance Rep.-Nuclear, l Waterford 3 L. O. Wright CR0 D Self-employed CR0 E Self-Employed H. W. Hartman United Energy Services J. J. Blessing CR0(Trainee) E Nuclear Start-Up Services F E. D. Hemila CR0 F Auxiliary Operator, Maine Yankee L. P. Germer CR0 (Trainee) i
i Table 2 Updateo: 07/30/85 l , Days Tests Were Required DETERMINAf10N OF WHEN LEAK RATE TESTS WERE REQUIRED BETWEEN 10/01/78 & 03/28/79 Date Time Plant Status Days TS Applicable
- Days TS Not Applicable
- 10/01/78 0000 Mode 1 10/08/78 1745 Enter Mode 5 7 10/09/78 2245 Enter Mode 4 1 10/10/78 1930 Enter Mode 5 1 10/12/78 0355 Enter Mode 4 3
~
11/10/78 1516 Enter Mode 5 28 11/20/78 1625 Enter Mode 4 11 11/23/78 0240 Enter Mode 5 2 12/01/78 0030 Enter Mode 4 8 01/16/79 0500 Enter Mode 5 46 . 01/30/79 0205 Enter Mode 4 14 03/28/79 0400 Accident 58 Total: Days in period 179 141 38 Note:
- TM1-2 Technical Specification 4.4.6.2, " Reactor Coolant System Operational Leakage,"
required the performance of a Reactor Coolant System Water Inventory Balance Test (leak rate test) at least once per 72 hours during steady state operation. The Technical Specification was applicable in modes 1, 2, 3, and 4. It was not applicable in Modes 5 or 6.
i Table 3 Updated: 07/30/85 Tests By Time of Day and Frequency Per Day [. l l Breakdown of the time of day tests were conducted l Shift on Which Tests Were Completed Wo. of Days No. of Tests Mid Day Swing Month Year hbove Mode 5 Retained 2300-0700 0700-1500 1500-2300 October 1978 26 35 12 12 11 November 1978 11 10 4 1 5 December 1978 31 41 13 11 17 January 1979 17 14 8 2 4 February 1979 28 37 15 8 14 March 1979 28 23 19 2 2
~
Total 141 160 71 36 53 (44%) (23%) (33%) Breakdown of the number of tests run per day for the days the surveillance procedure was applicable (above Mode 5) No. of Days Month Year Above Mode 5 None 1/ Day 2/ Day 3/ Day 4/ Day 5/ Day October 1978 26 2 16 7 0 0 1 November 1978 11 5 2 4 0 0 0 December 1978 31 4 14 12 1 0 0 January 1979 17 6 9 1 1 0 0 February 1979 28 5 11 10 2 0 0 March 1979 28 7 19 2 0 0 0
. Total 141 29 71 36 4 0 0 (21%) (50%) (26%) (3%) (0) (<1%)
Notes: 1. The data above covers the period 10/01/78 through 03/28/79.
- 2. The data above reflects only leak rate surveillance tests retained by the licensee. Many more tests were conducted; however, the data was discarded.
Table 4 Updated: 07/30/85 Tests By Month NOVEMBER 78 DECEMBER 78 JANUARY 79 FEBRUARY 79l MARCH 79 OCTOBER 78 3 NONE MODE 4
- 42 NONE NONE 134 1 2 33 43/44 83 97 98 135 136 2 4 i 32 3 5 34 35 45 NONE 99 100 137 7 NONE 46 84 101 102 138 4 6 5 8 36 47 48 85 86 103 104 105 139 37 ~ 38 49 87 88 89 106 140 6 NONE 7 NONE NONE NONE 90 107 108 NONE 50 91 109 110 141 8 MODE 5 1745 NONE 39 40 51 52 NONE 111 142 9 MODE 4 2245 MODE 5 1516 53 54 92 112 143 10 MODE 5 1930
-- 11 MODE 5 MODE 5 55 56 57 93 113 114 NONE MODE 5 58 NONE 115 144 12 MODE 4 0355 9 MODE 5 59 60 94 116 117 145 146 13 61 NONE 118 119 147 14 10 MODE 5 MODE 5 62 63 95 120 148 15 11 12 16 12A MODE 5 64 65 MODE 5 0500 121 122 149 MODE 5 66 67 MODE 5 123 150 17 128 68 MODE 5 NONE NONE 18 12C ** MODE 5 19 15 16 MODE 5 NONE MODE 5 124/125 126 151 69 MODE 5 NONE NONE l
20 17 MODE 4 1625 NONE 70 MODE 5 127 152 l 21 18 41 71 MODE 5 NONE 153 22 19 73 MODE 5 128 NONE 23 20 MODE 5 0240 72 74 MODE 5 NONE 154 24 21 MODE 5 75 76 MODE 5 129 155 l 25 22 23 MODE 5 l 2 6. _ 24 MODE 5 77 78 MODE 5 130 131 NONE MODE 5 132 NONE 27 25 26 MODE 5 79 MODE 5 NONE MODE 5 133 156 ACC. 28 27 MODE 5 XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX i 29 28 29 MODE 5 NONE 80 MODE 4 # 96 XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX 30 30 MODE 5 31 31 XXXXXXXXXXXX 81 82 NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX
- MODE 4 0030 # MODE 4 0205
**120/12E/13/14 l
Notes: 1. The surveillance procedure for leak rate testing is applicable only in Modes 1 to 4 and steady state conditions. It is not applicable in Modes 5 and 6.
- 2. The leak rate test numbers are shown in the block corresponding to the date the test was completed.
- 3. Test numbers to the left represent tests completed on the mid-shift (2300 to l
0700), tests done on the day-shift (0700-1500) are shown in the center and tests done on the swing-shift (1500-2300) are shown to the right.
Table 5 l' . Updated: 07/30/85. Questionable Tests By Shift And By Supervisor / Operator i Breakdown by Shift 01/01/79 to 03/28/79 09/30/78 to 03/28/79 Shift Shift Control Room Shift %/# Questionable Tests %/# Questionable Tests Supervisor Foreman Operators - D 93% 14 of 15 73% 24 of 33 Hitz Miller Olson, Wright & Coleman
- 8. 82% 14 of 17- -76% 26 of 34 Chwastyk Conaway Illjes, Kidwell &
Mell E 82% 9 of 11 78% 21 of 27 5mith Hoyt -Bocher, Hartman & Blessing C 73% 8 of 11 70% 30 of 43 Mehler Adams Congdon, Cooper & , s Phillippe F 57% 8 of 14 74% 23 of 31 Bryan Guthrie McGovern , 'Nemmila
& Germer A- 43% 6 of 14 46% 13 of 28 Zewe Scheimann Faust & Frederick Total 73% 54 of 74 69% 111 of 161
' Notes: 1. Questionable tests include the following:
- a. Water additions not accounted for in the leak rate calculation.
- b. Water additions not fully accounted for in the leak rate calculation .
(i.e.,under-recordedwateradditions).
- c. Hydrogen additions to the make-up tank (MUT) during the performance of a leak ,
l rate test. >
- d. Feed and bleed operations during the performance of a leak rate test.
- e. Tests performed during unstable plant conditions, (i.e., not in steady state).
- f. Test for which unstable instrumentation was used to provide input to the computer during the performance of a leak rate test..
- 2. Most leak rate tests were done by members of the same shift. However, some tests were performed with members of other shifts. In this situation, the leak rate test was included in the shift statistics for each shift involved. Thus, since some tests are double counted, the columns in the table above do not add up to the totals shown at the bottom of the table. ,
- 3. Shift F was not establsihed until 01/01/79. Thus, leak rate tests performed by shift F personnel prior to this date were done with other shifts.
_________ _______ __ a
Table 5 (continued) Questionable Tests By Shift And By Supervisor / Operator Breakdown by Supervisor For the period 01/01/79 to 03/28/79 For the period 09/30/78 to 03/38/79 Name Shift % Questionable # Questionable # Tests % Questionable # Questionable # Tests Hitz D 100% 2 2 80% 4 5 5mith E 100% 1 1 100% 2 2 Hoyt E 90% 9 10 85% 17 20 - Conaway B 86% 12 14 79% 22 28 Miller D 86% 12 14 72% 18 25 Adams C 73% 8 11 68% 28 41 Guthrie F 55% 6 11 68% 13 19 Scheimann A 50% 6 12 40% 8 20 Mehler C 0% 0 0 50% 1 2 Hutchison N/A 0% 0 1 0% 0 1 Notes: 1. No'rmally the Shift Foreman approved leak rate surveillance tests. Occasionally, the Shift Supervisor signed the test sheet. B. Mehler, G. Hitz and B. Smith were Shift Supervisors.
- 2. R. Hutchison was not on shift rotation during this period. He was a licensed SRO on TMI-1/2 assigned to Shift Supervisor training.
Breakdown by Operator for the period 01/01/79 to 03/28/79 For the period 09/30/78 to 03/28/79 Name Shift % Questionable # Questionable # Tests % Questionable # Questionable # Tests
~
Booher E 100% 8 8 86% 12 14 Hartman E 100% 4 4 80% 12 15 Wright D 100% 4 4 64% 9 14 Olson 0 92% 11 12 79% 15 19 Illjes B 88% 7 8 72% 13 18 Congdon C 88% 7 8 68% 19 28 Coleman D 88% 7 8 62% 13 21 Blessing E 83% 5 6 82% 9 11 Cooper C 80% 4 5 70% 21 30 Kidwell B 73% 8 11 75% 15 20 Mell B 71% 5 7 69% 9 13 Hemmila F 70% 7 10 B0% 12 15 McGovern F 60% ~ 6 10 71% 10 14 Frederick A 43% 6 14 48% 12 25 Faust A 42% 5 12 40% 8 20 Germer F 33% 2 6 64% 9 14 Phillippe C 0% 0 1 57% 4 7 Note: An operator is' considered to have been involved in a leak rate test if he was the individual who ran the test and signed the surveillance cheet or if he was the CR0 assigned to the panel (i.e., in charge of plant evolutions) and signed the CRO's Log. Therefore, in most cases there are two operators involved in each tests; however, in some cases the same individual signed both the surveillance test sheet and the CR0's Log for the period during which the test was conducted.
Table 6 Updated: 07/30/85 Overall Evaluation of High Leakage Period By Shift Period: 01/01/79 to 03/28/79 Evaluation of leak rate tests performed during the period: Number of Percent of Tests Tests Retained Total number of tests conducted during period....................... 74........ 100% Total numbe r of tes ts wi th no appa rent problem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20. . . . . . . . 27% Total number of ques tionabl e tests. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54. . . . . . . . 73% Characteristic that makes test questionable: Water additions (partially included in the calculation)........... 17........ 23% Water additions (not included in the calculation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10. . . . . . . . 14% Unstable instrument providing input to computer................... 9........ 12% Feed & bleed operations duri ng test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. . . . . . . . 11% Hydrogen additions during test.................................... 6......... 8%
, Hydrogen or water additions (unable to dif ferentiate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. . .. . . . . . 8%
Unstable plant conditions......................................... 1......... 1% Results showing unidentified leakage greater than 1 gpm........... 0......... 0% Note: Three tests (#87, #92 and #141) are included twice since they fall into two evaluation categories. Breakdown of leak rate test evaluation by shift: Shift "A" "B" "C" "D" "E" "F" Supervisor Zewe Chwastyk Mehler Hitz Smith Bryan Foreman Scheimann Conaway Adams Miller Hoyt Guthrie CR0 Frederick 111jes Condgon Olson Bocher McGovern CR0 Faust Kidwell Cooper Wright Hartman Hemmila Evaluation Category CR0 ----- Mell Phillippe Coleman Blessing Germer No apparent problem 8 3 3 2 2 6 0 12 0 3 Water additions 1 1 (partially included) 3 5 0 Water additions 1 1 1 (not included) Unstable Instrumentation 3 4 1 0 1 1 providing computer input 2 2 feed & bleed operations 0 1 2 2 during test 0 3 2 0 0 1 Hydrogen additions during test Hydrogen or water additions 0 2 2 0 1 1 (unable to differentiate) 0 0 0 0 Unstable plant conditions 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 Results showing unidentified 0 leakage greater than 1 gpm i i 1 0 i i l
\ \. . Table 7 Updated 07/30/85 1 1 Overall Evaluation Of High Leakage Period By Individual Period: 01/01/79 to 03/28/79 i Control Room Operator F F ! K M C- C P 0 W C B H B M H G a r 1 i e o o h 1 r o o a 1 e e e u e 1 d 1 n o i s i 1 o r e g m r s d j w 1 g p 1 o g e. h t s o m m
~
t e e e d p 1 n h m e m $ v i e r s 1 o e i t a r a i e 1 r i 1 n r p n n n r a c p g n l k e Total Evaluation of Test Shift A A B B B C C C D D D E E E F F F Number s No apparent problem 7 8 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 3 4 20 Water additions (partially 1 1 1 1 - - - - 11 4 6 - - - 3 3 0' 17 ~ includedincalculation) Water additions (not 1 1 1 2 2 -- 1 .
- - - 5 3 2 - - - 10 includedincalculation)
Unstable instrument providing 3 3 2 1 3 1 - - - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 9 . input to computer j Feed 5 bleed operations - - - 1 1 1 - - 1 1 - 3 1 1 2 2 - 8 during test Hydrogen additions - - 2 2 - 2 1 - - - - - - - - 1 1 6 Water or hydrogen additions - - 1 2 - 2 2 - - - - - - 1 1 1 - 6 (unable to differentiate) Unstable plant conditions - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 Results showing unidentified - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 leakage greater than 1 gpm 6 8 4 0 11 4 8 4 5 6 7 2 54 Number of Questionable tests 5 7 5 7 7 Total Tests 12 14 8 11 7 8 5 1 12 4 8 8 4 6 10 10 6 74 Notes: 1. Tests were included under an individual's name if he either signed the test as the operator performing the test or was the CR0 who had the panel and signed the CR0's Log for the period during which the test was conducted.
~
Rows and columns do not add together to provide totals since tests may f 2. involve one or more operators. Also, three tests (#87, #92 and #141) fall ! into two evaluation categories. l l
-_ _. ________ ____ _ A
l Table 8
- Updated: 07/30/85 Test Index For Individual Operators Shift CR0/* Test Number (Top Row = Questionable; Bottom Row =No Apparent Problems)
A Faust 10, 12A, 74, 83, 84, 85, 98, 149 40% 8 20, 21, 22, 25, 81, 102, 105, 113, 118, 154, 155, 156 A Frederick 10, 12, 12A, 64, 73, 80, 83, 84, 85, 98, 108, 149 48% 20, 21, 22, 25, 81, 102, 105, 113, 118, 127, 154, 155, 156 B 111 des 9, 28, 31, 47, 56, 69, 90, 91, 115, 123, ;24, 125, 147 72% 11, 22, 32, 46, 117 B Kidwell 23, 31, 34, 47, 56, 71, 76, 87, 110, 114, 115, 119, 124, 125, 147 75% 11, 16, 100, 104, 117 B Mell 9, 23, 28, 45, 90, 91, 92, 110, 114 69% 16, 32, 100, 104 C Congdon 6, 120, 12E, 18, 24, 29, 36, 39, 48, 53, 58, 80, 86, 108, 112, 120, s 68% (continued) 126, 130, 134 - 2, 5, 8, 15, 19, 26, 42, 49, 154 C Cooper 6, 120, 12E, 13, 14, 18, 24, 29, 36, 37, 39, 43, 44, 48, 51, 59, 62, 70% (continued) 120, 126, 130, 135 2, 5, 8, 15, 26, 42, 49, 55, 95 C Phillippe 27, 43, 80, 82 57% 19, 79, 89 D Olson 7, 14, 33, 66, 93, 122, I?,9. 131, 133, 137, 139, 140, 141, 142, 146 79% 3, 30, 38, 88 D Wright 12B, 35, 36, 70, 78, 133, 140, 141, 142 64% 1, 30, 38, 54, 60 0 Coleman 7, 12B, 33, 35, 50, 70, 93, 122, 129, 131, 132, 138, 146 62% 1, 3, 46, 54, 57, 60, 79, 88 E Booher 12C, 17, 75, 77, 94, 96, 97, 128, 143, 144, 145, 148 86% 4, 68 E Hartman 12C, 40, 52, 61, 63, 72, 75, 77, 94, 128, 143, 145 l 80% 4, 65, 67 E Blessing 34, 41, 63, 72, 96, 97, 135, 144, 148 82% 67,127 F McGovern 50, 64, 73, 74, 106, 111, 121, 150, 151, 153 71% 99, 103, 109, 116 F Hemmila 45, 58, 69, 71, 76, 106, 111, 121, 150, 151, 152, 153 80% 99, 101, 107 , F Genner 12, 17, 34, 40, 41, 52, 61, 96, 152, 64% 65, 101, 103, 107 109 Notes: 1. * - Indicates percentage of questionable tests 09/30/78 to 03/28/79.
- 2. Tests are numbered #1 (09/30/78) through #156 (03/28/79). Test #83 was the first test performed after 01/01/79.
- 3. Shift F was not established until 01/01/79. Thus, shift composition was different prior to 01/01/79.
Table 9 i Updated: 07/30/85 ' Test Approval Index For Shift Foremen / Supervisors l Shift Approved By/* Test Number (Top Row = Questionable, Second Row =No Apparent Problems) l A Scheimann 10, 12A, 83, 84, 85, 98, 108, 149 ! (40%) 20, 21, 22, 25, 30, 46, 102, 105, 113, 118, 127, 155 j B Conaway 9, 23, 28, 31, 45, 47, 58, 69, 71, 76, 87, 90, 91, 92, 110, 114, 115, q (79%) (continued) 119, 123, 124, 125, 147 J 4, 11, 15, 32, 100, 117 1 C Adams 6, 12D, 12E, 14, 18, 24, 27, 29, 36, 37, 39, 43, 44, 48, 51, 53, 59, (68%) (continued) 62, 80, 82, 86, 111, 112, 120, 126, 130, 134, 135 2, 5, 8, 15, 19, 26, 42, 49, 55, 79, 89, 95, 154 C Mehler 13 (50%) 68 D Miller 12B, 33, 35, 50, 66, 70, 93, 122, 129, 131, 132, 133, 138, 139, 140, ' s (72%) (continued) 141, 144, 146 . 1, 38, 54, 57, 60, 88, 156 0 Hitz 7, 78, 137, 142 (80%) 3 E Hoyt 52, 56, 61, 63, 64, 72, 75, 77, 94, 96, 97, 128, 136, 143, 144, 145, (85%) (continued) 148 65, 67, 104 E Smith 12, 148
~
(100%) None F Guthrie 12C, 17, 34, 40, 41, 73, 74, 106, 121, 150, 151, 152, 153 (68%) 81, 99, 101, 103, 107, 109 N/A Hutchison None (0%) 116 Notes: 1. * - Indicates percentage of questionable tests 09/30/78 to 03/28/79.
- 2. Normally the Shift Foreman approved leak rate surveillance tests. Occasionally, the Shift Supervisor signed the test sheet. B. Mehler, G. Hitz and B. Smith were Shift Supervisors.
- 3. R. Hutchison was not on shift rotation during this period. He was a licensed SRO on TMI-1/2 assigned to Shift Supervisor training. 1
_ _ _ _ __.____m _____-____
f-Table 10 Updated: 07/30/85
. Leak Rate Tests By Evaluation Category Breckdown of the number of leak rate surveillance tests exhibiting questionable characteristics.
Number 1 of Tests Characteristic that makes test questionable of tests Retained Test with no apparent problem 50 311 ynstableinstrumentusedasinputtocomputer 42 261 uater additions not included in calculation 22 14% Water additions not fully included in calculation 17 11% Feed and bleed operations during test 15 91 Hydrogen additions 12 7% Unstable plant conditions during test 10 61 Waterorhydrogenaddition(unabletodifferentiate) 7 41 Results greater than 1 gpm which were retained. 6 41 Note: A total of 161 tests were retained during the period 09/30/78 and UT/R/ 79. Of these 14 fall into two categories and 3 fall into three categories. , Tabulation of leak rate tests by evaluation category. The Shift performing the test is indicated beside the test number. If more than one shift was involved, the shift letter for each shift involved is listed. No Apparent Unstable Water Additions Feed & Bleed Water or Hydrogen
- Froblem Instrument (siot included) Operations Additions 1D '31 B 12 F/A/E 6 0 6Z L
- 2C 33 D 14 C/D 7 D '87 B 30 34 F/E/B 18 C *12E C 121 F i 4 E/B 35 D 24 C *29 C 125 B 5C '36 C/D '28 B *43 C 126 C l
l 8C 37 C '36 C/D '58 F/C/B 130 C 11 B 41 F/E '50 D/F '72 E 136 E 15 C '43 C *56 B/E 97 E 16 B 44 C *71 B/F 106 F Leak Rate Exceeds : 19 C 45 B/F '72 E 110 B T5 Limit of I som 20 A 47 B *77 E 111 F/C lZA A 21 A 48 C 78 0 112 C 128 0 22 A/B '50 D/F '92 B 128 E 1?C E/F 25 A 51 C 94 E 132 D 120 C 26 C 52 E/F 98 A *141 D *12E C 30 D/A 53 C 114 B 13 C 32 B *!5 B/E 115 B Hydrogen. 38 D '58 F/C/B 135 C Additions 42 C 59 C 143 E 17 f/E 46 D/B/A 61 E/F 144 E/D 23 8 49 C 64 F/A/E 145 E '36 C/D 54 D 66 D 148 E 39 C 55 C '69 B/F 63 E 57 D '70 D Water Additions '69 B/F 60 0 *71 B/F lonly partteily 119 8 65 F/E *72 E included) 120 C 67 E 73 F/A 93 D hz3 min) 123 8 68 E/C 74 F/A 122 0 I,13 min) 124 B 79 C/D 75 E 129 D i 134 C 81 A/F 76 B/F 131 D ;17 ming152 4 ming F 88 D '77 E 133 D, amin (I f 89 C 80 C/A 137 0 I; 3minh Unstable 95 C 82 C 138 D h 2 min,i Fiant 99 F 83 A 139 D L10 ming Conditions 100 8 84 A 140 D 1 min) 9 5 101 F 85 A *141D( L 3 mini 10 A . 102 A 86 C 142 D i;3minh 27 C 103 F '87 B 146 0 L 5minh *28 B
- 104 B/E 90 B 147B(15 min *29 C 105 A 91 B 149 A 19 min )f *31 B 107 F '92 B 150 F I (,24minh 40 F/E 109 F 96 F/E 151 F i 1 mini '70 0 113 A 153 F (, 7 min) *77 E 116 F 108 C/A 117 B (timeshownis 118 A the time before 127 A/E end of test that 154 A/C waterwasadded) 155 A 156 A/D *1dentifies tests that fall into more than one category, i
j 1 I ' l Table 11 I Individual Test Synopsis -I i This table provides a synopsis of each of the TMI-2 leak rate surveillance ' tests which were retained by the licensee and conducted between the period September 30, 1978 and March 28, 1979. a . O l l l
i TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 1 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Connents (times are clock time)
'l 09/30 1734 1834 Coleman Miller No water or hydrogen additions. -
,1914 2014 Wright ;
2 09/30 2323 0023* Cooper Adams No water or hydrogen additions. : 0153* 0253* Congdon *10/01/78 i 3 10/01 1929 2029 Olson Hitz No water or hydrogen additions. 0004* 0104* Coleman *10/02/78 4 10/02 0728 0828 Hartman Conaway No water or hydrogen additions. 1258 1358 Bocher s 5 10/02 2305 0005* Cooper Adams No water or hydrogen additions. 0505* 0605* Congdon *10/03/78 4 6 10/04 0512 0612 Congdon Adams Feed and bleed operation of 160 gal 1445 1545 Cooper during test. Net effect on test appears negligible. No log entry. Not included in calculation. 7 10/04 2034 2134 Olson Hitz Feed and bleed operation of 200 gal 0930* 1030* Coleman during test. Net effect on test appears negligible. No log entry. Not included in calculation. ,
*10/05/78 l 8 10/05 0029 0129 Cooper Adams No water or hydrogen additions. ;
1339 1439 Congdon 9 10/13 1116 1216 Mell Conaway Unstable plant conditions (startup 1121 1221 111jes inprogress). Note: Unidentified leak rate = -8,5 gpm. 10 10/14 1504 1604 Frederick Scheimann Unstable plant conditions (startup 1509 1609 Faust in progress). 11 10/15 1140 1240 111jes Conaway No water or hydrogen additions. 1140 1240 Kidwell 12 10/15 1928 2028 Genner Smith Water addition of 150 gal at 1940. 1928 2028 Frederick No log entry. Between 2000 and 2015 1arge decrease and then increase in MUT level caused by shifting of FW i demands or feed & bleed. With gross ] leak rate of 2.5 gpm, MUT level I should have decreased 5" during test. l Instead MUT level increased 2". J KEY Start /Stop time: Top entry is clock time the test was started and ended. The second f entry is the MUT strip chart time that corresponds with the leak rate test clock time. l Test /CRO: Top name is the individual who signed the leak rate surveillance test record as the operator performing the test. The bottom name is the individual who signed the CRO's Log for the period during which the test was perfonned (i.e., panel operator). Approved: The name of the SRO who signed the leak rate surveillance test record as apgrovingthetest.UsuallytestapprovalwassignedbytheShiftForeman. (beside test no.): Evaluation results questionable.
"?
l
l l TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 2 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Comments (times are clock time) 12A 10/16 1935 2035 Frederick
- Scheimann* Unsigned, unapproved leak rate test 1927 2027 Faust indicating unidentified leak rate of 2.56 gpm. Not filed with surveillance tests.
- Assumptions based on shift composition.
128 10/17 1328 1428 Goleman Miller
- Signed by Coleman but not approved 1323 1423 Wright leak rate test indicating unidentified leak rate of 2.07 gpm.
Not filed with surveillance tests.
- Assumption based on shift composition.
12C 10/18 0514 0614 Hartman* Guthrie* Unsigned, unapproved leak rate test 0509 0609 Booher indicating unidentified leak rate of 1.77 gpm. Note on test: " rounds off high but is corrected by leak rate 10/18/78 7:35:27 start time, ie i into action statement at 5:13:02 out of it at 7:35:27." Not filed with surveillance tests.
- Assumptions based on shift composition.
120 10/18 0736 0836 Congdon* Adams
- Unsigned, unapproved leak rate test 0731 0831 Cooper indicating unidentified leak rate ;
of 1.29 gpm. Handwritten note on j test: "0K by roundoff." j Not filed with surveillance tests. ;
- Assumptions based on shift l
' composition.
12E7 10/18 0859 0959 Congdon* Adams
- Unsigned, unapproved leak rate test 0854 0954 Cooper indicating unidentified leak rate of 1,32 gpm. Handwritten note on test:
"OK by roundoff." Possible feed and bleed operation at 0940. Net effect approximately +40 gal. No log entry.
Not included in calculation. Not filed with surveillance tests.
- Assumptions based upon shift composition.
1 13? 10/18 1018 1118 Adams
- Mehler* Unidentified leakage 1.02 gpm.
1013 1113 Cooper Handwritten note on Test: " Net unidentified leak rate rounded off to nears (sic) whole number."
- Test signed by SF and approved by SS.
Not filed with surveillance tests. 14? 10/18 1221 1321 Olson Adams No water or hydrogen addtions l 1216 13'6 Cooper ~ apparent on strip chart; however, due to gross leak rate and decreases in MUT level, Tave and Lp, approximately 100 gal of water may have been added. Not included in calculation. Not filed with sur-veillance tests.
1 l l . TM1-2LeakRateTests(09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 3
-festNo. Oate Start -Stop Test /CR0 Approved Coments (times are clock time)
'15 10/19 0746 0846 Cooper Adams No water or hydrogen additions.
0736 0836 Congdon 16 10/19 1849 1949 Kidwell Conaway No water or hydrogen additions. 1844 1944 Mell Note: Power increased from 61% to l 63% during test. No apparent effect ! on test. 17 10/20 0213 0313 Bocher Guthrie Hydrogen addition. CR0 Log states: ;l , 0203 0303 Germer 0214 vented MUT. 0230 added 18# hydrogen to MUT. 0308 added more-hydrogen. Effect uncertain. MUT ; level decreases -6", pressurizer level increases +10.5" during test. Slope of MUT generally -2"/ hour. 18 10/21 1239 1339 Cooper Adams Water addition of 50 gal, at 1258. 1205 1305 Congdon No log entry. Not included in calculation. 19 10/22 0755 0855 Phillippe Adams No water or hydrogen additions. 0730 0830 Phillippe/ ' Congdon 20 10/23 0405 0505 Frederick Schiemann No water or hydrogen additions. 0345 0445 Faust 21 10/24 0311 0411 Faust Scheimann No water or hydrogen additions. 0255 0355 Fredarick 22 10/24 2230 2330 Frederick Scheimann No water or hydrogen additions. 2222 2322 !)ijes/ Faust 23 10/25 1627 1727 Kidwell Conaway Hydrogen addition logged at 1717. 1619 1719 Mell Initially level decreases -2" then increases +3". Het effect appears negligible. 24? 10/26 2007 2107 Cooper Adams Possible water addition of 60 gal, at 1959 2059 Congdon 2013. No log entry. Not included in calculation. 25 10/27 0440 0540 Frederick
- Scheimann* No leak rate surveillance test sheet.
0432 0532 Faust Only record of test is log entry in Shift Foreman's Log. Completed test 0540.
- Assumptions based on shift composition.
26 10/27 1703 1803 Congdon Adams No water or hydrogen additions. 1655 1755 Cooper 27 10/28 1605 1705 Phillippe Adams Invalid test. Large oscillations in 1605 1705 Phillippe MUT level indication. Results not reliable.
I
\
l i TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 4 ) { Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Coments (times are clock time) l 28 10/29 0132 0232 Mell Conaway Invalid test. Large oscillations in s0132 0232 111jes MUT level indication. In addition, water addition of 330 gal, made ; during test. Logged in CR0 log. Not I included in calculation. 29 10/29 1520 1620. Cooper Adams Invalid test. Large oscillations in 1520 1620 Congdon MUT level indication. Ir addition, feed and bleed operation of approximately 800 gal, performed during test. No log entry not included in calculation. NOTE: LT-2 TAKEN OUT OF SERVICE AT 0130. LT-1 VENTED BY I&C AT 0913. 30 10/30 1131 1231 Olson Scheimann No water or hydrogen additions. 1131 1231 Wright Note: Difference between LT-1 and LT-2 is 0". 31 10/31 0341 0441 111jes Conaway Unstable plant conditions. MUT level 0336 0436 Kidwell decreases -7.32" and pressurizer level increases +10.52". Note: Difference between LT-1 and LT-2 is 13". 32 11/02 0332 0432 111jes Conaway No water or hydrogen additions. 0340 0440 Mell Note: Difference between LT-1 and LT-2 is approximately 0". 33 11/02 1829 1929 Coleman Miller Invalid test. Note: Difference 1839 1939 Olson between LT-1 and LT-2 is 14". 34 11/03 0626 0726 Blessing Guthrie Invalid test. LT providing input 0646 0746 Kidwell/ to computer is pegged at 99". Germer 35 T1/03 1658 1758 Wright Miller Invalid tests. LT providing input tc 1708 1808 Coleman computer pegged at 99". NOTE: LT-1 AND LT-2 ISOLATED FROM 1955 TO 2105 (WRITTEN ON MUT STRIP CHART). 36 11/05 2215 2315 Congdon Adams Water and hydrogen addition. Test 2227 2327 Wright / begun during a 500 gal, water Cooper addition. 150 gal. added during test. Log entry for 500 gal. addition at 2210. Not included in calculation. Hydrogen added at 2230 (some effect). Hydrogen addition l logged in CR0 Log at 2230. Note: ! Both hydrogen and water additions done on Wright's shift (Shift D). Note: Difference between LT-1 and LT-2 is 15". j i l I l
TMI-2LeakRateTests(09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 5 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Coments (times are clock time) 37 11/06 0204 0304 Cooper Adams Invalid test. Difference between p216 0316 Cooper LT-1 and LT-2 is 15". NOTE: 1615 LT-1 AND LT-2 RECALI-BRATED AND BACK IN SERVICE (CR0'S LOG). 38 11/06 1931 2031 Olson Miller No water or hydrogen additions. 1945 2045 Wright ; 39 11/09 0409 0509 Cooper Adams Hydrogen addition 0415. Logged in 0415 0515 Congdon CR0 Log as a late entry (small effect j 2" or 60 gal.) 40 11/09 1954 2054 Hartman Guthrie Invalid test. Plant evolutJons in progress effecting MUT level 2009 2109 Genner indication. 41 11/22 0217 0317 Gemer Guthrie Invalid test. Tha indicates $$$ and 0157 0257 Blessing Tave indicates -17.2"F. 42? 12/01 1701 1801 Cooper Adams Unable to read MUT strip chart. 2111 2211 Congdon Plant heatup in progress. LT-1 UNSTABLE PERIOD BEGINS. LT-1 , REMAINS UNSTABLE THROUGH JANUARY 11, 1979. 43 12/02 1632 1732 Phillippe Adams Invalid test. Feed and bleed 2042 2142 Cooper operation during test. No log entry. l Not included in calculation. Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer to test. 44 12/02 1918 2018 Cooper Adams No water or hydrogen additions. 2330 0030* Cooper Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer. *12/03/78. 45 12/03 0510 0610 Mell Conaway No water or hydrogen additions. 0920 1020 Hemila Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. ! 12/03 0945* 1045* Coleman* or Miller No surveillance test sheet, only log 1355* 1455* Wright
- entries in CR0 and SF Logs. Note:
Olson Unstable LT-1 us.ed as input to computer for test.
- Assumptions based on shift composition.
46? 12/04 0628 0728 Coleman Scheimann No water or hydrogen additions. 1038 1138 111jes/ Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to
. Coleman computer.
I l j
- ----_ _---_ m
1 TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 6 Test No. Date Start Step Test /CR0 Approved Comments (times are clock time) 47 12/05 0507 0607 Illjes Conaway No water or hydrogen additions. iO917 1018 Kidwell Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. 48 12/05 1841 1941 Congdon Adams No water or hydrogen additions. 2251 2351 Cooper Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. 49 12/06 1905 2005 Cooper Adams No water or hydrogen additions. 2305 0005* Congdon Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test. *12/07/78. 12/07 0720 1000 Booher* or Hoyt* MUT strip chart has handwritten note: 4 1120 1400 Hartman* " Switched to LT-1 for Leak rates." s Blessing No surveillance test sheets retained. Assume test results discarded.
- Assumptions based upon shift composition.
12/07 1740 2000 Olson* or Miller
- MUT strip chart switched to LT-1, 2140 2400 Coleman* No surveillance test sheets Wright retained. Assume test results discarded.
- Assumptions based upon shift composition.
12/07 2320 0035**111jes* or Conaway* MUT strip chart switched to LT-1. j 0235** 0350**Mell* No surveillance test sheets ' Kidwell retained. Assume test results discarded.
- Assumptions based upon shift composition. **12/08/78.
12/08 0035 0135 Illjes* or Conaway Leak rate test results logged in CR0 j 0350 0450 Mell* Log at 0130 and in SF Log at 0135. Kidewll Results: Unidentified leakage.
.6998 gpm. Note: Unstable LT-1 used ;
as input to computer for test. t
,
- Assumptions based upon shift l composition.
50 12/08 1617 1717 McGovern Miller Water addition of 60 gal. at 1622. 2005 2105 Coleman Offset of MUT strip chart 2". No log entry. Not included in calculation. l Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to I computer for test. ' 51 12/08 2334 0034* Cooper Adams No water or hydrogen additions. 0339* 0439* Cooper Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input te computer for test. *12/09/78. 52 12/09 1149 1249 Hartman Hoyt No water or hydrogen additions. 1549 1649 Genner Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input tc computer for test.
t TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 7 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved' Coments (times are clock time) 12/09 ** ** Wright
- or Miller ** Leak rate test results logged in
. f* Coleman* .CR0 tog at 1655 and in SF Log at 1800 Olson Results: Unidentified leakage
.2607 gnm. Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test.
- Assumptions based upon shift composition.
53 . 12/09 2252 '2352 Congdon Adams No water or hydrogen additions. i 0252* 0352* Congdon Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. *12/10/78. 54 12/10 1820' 1920 Coleman Miller No water or hydrogen additions. 2220 2320 Wright Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test.- - 55 12/11 0029 0129 Cooper Adams No water or hydrogen additions. 0429 0529 Cooper Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test. 567 12/11 0650 0750 111jes Hoyt Possible water addition of 60 9s1. at 1050 1150 Kidwell 0745. No log entry. Not included in calculation. MUT level should have decreased -2" during test; however, level increased +2". Note: Unstable' LT-1 used as input to computer for j test. 57 12/11 1659 1759 Coleman Miller No water or hydrogen additions. 1 2059 2159 Coleman Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test. 58 12/12 1010 1110 Hensnila Conaway Water addition of 330 gal. About i 1410 1510 Congdon 210 gal, added during the test as j part of a feed and bleed operation, j No log entry. Not included in j calculation. Note: Unstable LT-1 ) used as input to computer for test. 59 12/12 2255 2355 Cooper Adams No water or hydrogen additions. i 0255* 0355* Cooper Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. *12/13/78. l 60 12/13 1950 2050 Coleman Miller No water or hydrogen additions. 2350 0050* Wright Note: Stab 1c LT-2 used as input to I computer for test. *12/14/78.
)
12/14 0145 0245 Cooper
- or Adams MUT strip chart switched.to LT-1 for 0545 0645 Phillippe* 1 hour period between 0145 and 0245.
Congdon No surveillance test sheet retained.
-Assume test results discarded.
- Assumptions based upon shift composition.
L TH1-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 8 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Comments (times are clock time) 12/14 0354 0454 Cooper
- or Adams Leak rate test results logged in CR0 0745 0854 Phillippe Log at 0530 and in SF Log at 0454.
Congdon Results: Unidentified leakage. l
.6995 gpm. During test period approximately 350 gal. feed and bleed operation occurred. Note: Stable
- LT-2 used as input to computer to test.
61 12/14 1944 2044 Germer Hoyt No water or hydrogen additions. 2344 0044* Hartman Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to l computer for test. *12/15/78. 627 12/15 0208 0308 Cooper Adams Possible small water addition or 0608 0708 Cooper hydrogen addition between 0230 and 0240. Note Stable LT-2 used as input , to computer for test. Two other leak ! rate tests were probably run first between 2320 and 0150 based upon switching of level transmitters. 63 12/15 1822 1922 Hartman Hoyt Hydrogen addition at 1845. Logged in 2020 2120 Blessing A0's Log. Most of initial effect decayed off by end of test. Net effect appears to be +1.5" in MUT level indication. Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test. 64 12/16 1328 1428 McGovern Hoyt No water or hydrogen additions. 1730 1830 Frederick Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for. test. 65 12/16 2004 2104 Germer Hoyt No water or hydrogen additions. 1 0020* 0120* Hartman Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test. One other leak rate test was probably run first between 1855 and 1955 based upon switching of level transmitters.
*12/17/78.
66 12/17 0220 0320 Olson Miller No water or hydrogen additions. 0220 0320 Olson Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. 67 12/17 1528 1628 Hartman Hoyt No water or hydrogen additions. 1525 1625 Blessing Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test. _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _m
TMI-2LeakRateTests(09/30/l8-03/28/79) Page 9 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Comments (times are clock time) 68 12/18 1815 1915 Morch Mehler No water or hydrogen additions. 1815 1915 8coher Hand calculation. 69 12/20 0809 0905 111jes Conaway Hydrogen addition 0855 (3.5" or 100 0809 0905 Hemmila gal effective). No log entry. Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. Possible switch of level transmitters at end of test. 70 12/21 0259 0359 Coleman Miller Invalid test. Plant heatup in 0259 0359 Wright progress. Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. 71 12/22 0810 0910 Hemila Conaway Water addtion of 200 gal, at 0820. s 0810 0910 Kidwell No log entry. Not included *in calculation. Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. 727 12/22 2326 0026* Blessing Hoyt Possible water addition of 100 gal. 2326 0026* Hartman at 0015. Appears feed and bleed operations may have started prior to the end of the test. No log entry. No included in calculation. Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. *12/23/78 73 12/23 2048 2148 Frederick Guthrie No water or hydrogen additions; 2048 2148 McGovern however, by using Unstable LT-1 for input to computer for the test MUT level increased +.542" instead of decreasing -2". Net effect approximately 100 gal. I 74 12/24 1736 1836 McGovern Guthrie No water or hydrogen additions. CR0 1736 1836 Faust Log shows water added at 1830 (i.e, during test); however, log entry is in error. Water added at 1730. Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. 75 12/25 0120 0220 Hartman Hoyt No water or hydrogen additons. 0120 0220 Bocher Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. 76 12/25 0752 0852 Hemila Conaway No water or hydr 69en aJditions; 0752 0852 Kidwell however, by using unstable LT-1 for input to computer for the test, MUT ' level increased +1.5" instead of decreasing -2". Net effect approximately 85 gal. 1
, TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 10 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Comments (times are clock time)
'777 12/26 0249 0349 Booher Hoyt Possible small water addition 0227 0327 Hartman of 20 to 30 gal. during test.
' Unstable plant conditions for test.
Change in pressurizer level of -13.9" and change in MUT level of +4.4" during test. Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer during l test. Signficant level difference between LT-1 and LT-2. 787 12/26 0916 1016 Wright Hitz Possible water addition of 50 gal. 0900 1000 Wright during test. MUT level should have decreased -2" during test; however, level increased +.67". Change in Tave and pressurizer level do not
- account for net difference". Note:
Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test. 79 12/27 0810 0910 Coleman Adams No water or hydrogen additions. 0825 0925 Phillippe Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test. 12/28 1140 1240 Phillippe* Adams
- MUT strip chart switched to LT-1 for 1200 1300 or Cooper 1 hour period between 1140 and 1240.
Congdon No surveillance test sheet retained. Assume test results discarded.
' Assumptions based upon shift composition.
80 12/30 0615 0715 Phillippe Adams No water or hydrogen additions; 0635 0735 Frederick / however, MUT level should have Congdon decreased -2" during test. Instead level increased +3.95". Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. Significant j difference in readings between LT-1 j and LT-2. Net effect approximately !
+193 gal. accounting for the large j negative leak rate of -3.8 gpm. LRT was started on midshift (Frederick CRO) and was completed on day shift by shift C.
81 12/31 0516 0616 Frederick Guthrie No water of hydrogen additions. 0537 0637 Faust Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test.
)
l l
l i TM1-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 11 Test No. Oate Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved ' Conenents (times are clock time) 82 12/31 1225 1325 Phillippe Adams No water or hydrogen additions; 1245 1345 Phillippe however, MUT level should have decreased -3" during test. Instead l 1evel increased +2.2". Note: {' Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. Significant-difference in readings between LT-1 and LT-2. Net effect approximately
+185 gal, accounting for the large negative leak rate of -2.4 gpm.
83 01/02 0103 0203 Frederick Scheimann No water or hydrogen additions; 0118 0218 Faust however, MUT level should have 1
., decreased -3" during test. Instead '
,, level change was approximately 0". !
Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. Significant difference in readings between LT-1 and LT-2. Net'effect approximately -
+34 gal. accounting for the negative leak rate of .45 gpm.
84 01/04 0302 0402 Frederick Scheinban No water or hydrogen additions; 0320 0420 Faust however, MUT level should have 4 decreased -3" during test. Instead 1 level decreased only .2". Note ! Unstable LT-1 used as input to j computer for test. Net effect j approximately +75 gal. 01/04 121S 1315 Olson* or MCler* MUT strip chart switched to LT-1 for l 1245 1345 Wright
- 1 hour period between 1215 and 1315.
Coleman No surveillance test sheet retained. Assume results discarded.
*Assurnptions based upon shift composition.
01/04 1520 1745 Congdon* or Adams
- MUT strip chart switched to LT-1 for 1550 1815 Phillippe* 2 two-hour periods as noted. It Cooper appears 2 leak rate tests may have been run on LT-2 (stable) then one i 1910 2120 test on LT-1 (unstable) and then two l
1940 2150 moreonLT-2(stable). No surveillance test sheets retained. Assume results discaided. ,
- Assumptions based upon shift i composition.. l 85 01/05 0254 0354 Faust Scheimann No water or hydrogen additions; 0309 0409 Frederick however, HUT level should have decreased -3" during test. Instead level decreased only -2.1". Note: l Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. Net effect approximately +40 gal. l l
l
4 I TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 12 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Conenents (times are clock time) l 86 01/05 1723 1823 Congdon Adams No water or hydrogen additions. 1738 1838 Congdon Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. Significant difference in readings between LT-1 and LT-2. Net effect approximately-
+74 gal.
87? 01/06 0247 0347 Kidwell Conaway Possible water or hydrogen addition 0302 0402 Kidwell at 0335. Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. The combination of water / hydrogen addition and the use of LT-1 provide a net effect of +165 gal. accounting for the low gross leak rate and negative unidentified leak fate of
.50 gpm.
01/06 0510 0610 111jes* or Conaway* MUT strip chart switched to LT-1 for 0535 0635 Mell* 1 hour period between 0510 and 0610. Kidwell No surveillance test sheet retained. Assume results discarded.
- Assumptions based upon shift composition.
Miller 88 01/06 1029 1129 Coleman No apparent water or hydrogen addi-1044 1144 Olson tions. Note: Stable LT-2 used input to computer for test. 89 01/06 1920 2020 Phillippe Adams No apparent water or hydrogen 1935 2035 Phillippe additions. Note: Stable LT-2 used as input to computer for test.
]
90 01/07 0341 0356 0441 111jes 0456 Mell Conaway No water or hydrogen additons; however, MUT level should have
)
decreased -3" during test. Instead level decreased only .89". Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. Significant difference in readings between LT-1 and LT-2. Net effect approximately
+84 gal, accounting for the low gross leak rate and negative unidentified .
leak rate of .22 gpm. 01/07 0835 1445 Olson* or Miller Between 0835/0935,1035/1135 l 0850 1500 Wright
- and 1345/1445 the MUT strip chart '
Coleman was switched from LT-2 to LT-1. No surveillance test sheets retained. Assume results discarded. , _* Assuroptions based upon shift l composition. l
.s TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 13 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Coments (times are clock time) 91 01/08 0321 0421 Mell Conaway No water or hydrogen additions; 0336 0436 111jes however, MUT level should have decreased -3" during test. Instead level increased +1.2". Note:
Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. Significant difference in readings between LT-1 and LT-2. Net effect +108 gal. accounting for negative values for gross and unidentified leak rates. Significant difference between LT-1 and LT-2. 9M s 01/10 0148 0248 Mell Conaway Possible water addition of 150 gal. 0203 0303 Mell at 0218. No log entry. Not. included in calculation. Note: Unstable LT-1 used as input to computer for test. Significant difference between LT-1 and LT-2. NOTE: LT-1 REPAIRED.(CANNOT DETERMINE WHETHER LT-1 OR LT-2 USED AS COMPUTER INPUT FOR REMAINDER OF TESTS.) 93 01/11 2153 2253 Coleman Hiller Water addition of 240 gal. at 2230. 2208 2308 Olson Log entry of 200 gal. 200 gal. included in calculation. Water added 23 minutes prior to end of test. 94 01/13 0937 1037 Hartman Hoyt Water addition of 117 gal. at 0950. 0952 1052 Bocher Logged in CR0 Log at 1000. Not included in calculation. 01/13 1330* 1430* Hartman** Hoyt 1430 CR0 Log entry: " Performed Bocher another good leak rate." No surveillance sheet on file.
- Based '
upon log entry. ** Based upon shift composition. 957 01/15 0024 0124 Cooper Adams No apparent water or hydrogen 0044 0144 Cooper additions; however, MUT level should decrease -4" during test. Actual decrease is only -2". l l 96 01/30 2206 2306 McGovern* Hoyt No water or hydrogen additions. i 2206 2306 or Hemila* Test was started on shift F and l & Blessing completed on shift E. Difference Ge rtner* * & between MUT LTs is approximately 6". Bocher** . Test signed by Blessing. *Assump- { tions based upon shift composition.
**Bocher & Germer both signed CR0 log during test period.
l l l l
TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 14 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Comments (times are clock time) 97? 02/02 0055 0155 Blessing Hoyt .Water addition of 300 gal. at 0100 is 9225 0325 Booher logged in CR0 Log. Water addition is not evident on MUT level trace. It is possible this was a feed and bleed operation. No water additions are included in the calculation. 98 02/02 1431 1531 111jes* or Scheimann Possible water addition of 110 1601 1701 Kidwell* & gal. at 1525. MUT level should have Faust decreased -3.5". Actual level Mell & decreased .2". Test started on Frederick shift B. Frederick relieved Mell at 1500.
- Assumptions based upon shift composition.
' 99 02/03 0517 0617 McGovern Guthrie No water or hydrogen additions.
0647 0747 Hemmila 100 02/03 1032 1132 Mell Conaway No water or hydrogen additions. 1202 1302 Kidwell 101 02/03 2349 0049* Hemmila Guthrie No water or hydrogen additions. 0119* 0219* Germer *02/04/79. 102 02/04 1445 1545 Faust Scheimann No water or hydrogen additions. 1615 1715 Frederick 103 02/05 0312 0412 Gerner Guthrie No water or hydrogen additions. 0442 0542 McGovern 104 02/05 0835 0935 Kidwell Hoyt No water or hydrogen additions. 1005 1105 Mell 105 02/05 1837 1937 Frederick Scheimann No water or hydrogen additions. 2007 2107 Faust j l 106 02/06 0025 0125 McGovern Guthrie Invalid test. At 0045 MUT ) 0155 0255 Hemmila level drops -270 gals then slowly increased +210 gal. during the remainder of the test. Change is either caused by bleed and feed or by control rod movement (rod control in manual.) 9
a TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 15 ; Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Comments (times are clock time) 107 02/07 0150 0250 Hemmila Guthrie No water or hydrogen additions. 0320 0420 Germer 108 02/07 1352 1452 Cooper
- or Adams ** Test invalid. Unstable plant 1522 1622 Phillippe* Scheimann** conditions caused by power level Frederick **& changes or feed and bleed operation.
Congdon** Test performed on C shift, approved by A shift.
- Assumptions.
** Frederick signed test /Scheimann approved test. Congdon and Adams on watch during test.
109 02/08 0100 0200 Germer Guthrie No water or hydrogen additions. 0230 0330 McGovern
~
1107 02/08 2050 2150 Mell Conaway Possible feed and bleed operation 2220 2320 Kidwell (100 gal.) near start of leak rate test. May have had small effect on test results. 111 02/09 0220 0320 McGovern Adams Feed and bleed operation started 0350 0450 Hemmila before test begun; however, more water appears to have been bleed from the RCS, contributing to a higher leak rate than would otherwise be the case. Test is invalid. 112 02/10 0841 0941 Congdon Adams Feed and bleed operation 100 gal. 1011 1111 Congdon between 0900 and 0910. Amount appears equal and may not have affected test results. 113 02/11 0241 0341 Frederick Scheimann No water or hydrogen additions. l 0411 0511 Faust 114 02/11 1808 1908 Mell Conaway Water addition of 300 gal. at 1938 2038 Kidwell 1825 logged in CR0 Log. Actual amount appears to be 180 gal. from MUT strip chart. Addition is not included in calculation. RCDT was t pumped down during test. Not included in calculation. 115 02/12 2120 2220 Kidwell Conaway Water addition of 150 gal. at 2125.- 2250 2350 111jes Not logged in CR0 Log or included in calculation. RCDT pumped down during test. Not included in calculation.
(
. TM1-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 16 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Comments (times are clock time) 116 02/13 1236 1336 Hutchinson* Hutchinson* No water or hydrogen additions.
1406 1506 McGovern Guthrie* *R.S. Hutchinson was off-shift SR0 on l TM1-1/2 assigned to Shift Supervisor Training. Guthrie was SF but did not sign test. 117 02/13 1842 1942 Illjes Conaway No water or hydrogen additions. i 2012 2112 Kidwell l 118 02/14 0530 0630 Faust Scheimann Water addition of 210 gal. at 0600. 0700 0800 Frederick Not logged in CR0 Log but 206 gal. are included in calculation. l 119 02/14 2046 2146 Kidwell Conaway Hydrogen addition at 2135 (2" or 2216 2316 Olson*/ 60 gal. effect). Notloggedin Kidwell* CR0 Log but logged in A0 s Log.
*Kidwell relieved Olson at 2130 thus hydrogen was added on Kidwell's watch (Shift B).
120 02/15 2026 2126 Cooper Adams Hydrogen addition 2100 (2" or 60 2156 2256 Congdon gal.effect). Logged in CR0 Log.
" Pressurized MUT" written on strip chart (Adams' handwriting according toCongdon).
1217 02/16 0253 0353 McGovern Guthrie Hydrogen or water addition at 0325. 0423 0523 Hemmila (2" or 60 gal, effect). MUT shows same characteristics as test 120. No CR0 Log entry. Not included in calculation. 122 02/16 1203 1303 Olson Miller Water addition of 210 gal. at 1250. 1333 1433 Coleman Logged in CR0 Log and included in calculation as 204 gal. (Reconstruction shows 234 gal. effect) Beginning of shift D pattern of adding water near end of test - (13 min. before end of test). 123 02/17 0"11 0511 111jes Conaway Hydrogen addition 0500 (2" or 60 gal. 0541 0641 111jes change, only 1" or 30 gal. effective). Not logged in CR0 Log but is logged in A0 s Log. 124 02/19 0001 0101 Kidwell Conaway Hydrogen addition 0100 (2" or 60 gal. 0131 0231 111jes but only 1" or 30 gal. effective during test). No log entry. 125 02/19 0136 0236 Kidwell Conaway Hydrogen or water addition at 0200 0306 0406 111jes (1" or 30 gal, effect). No log entry. Not included in calculation.
THI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 17 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Coments (times are clock time) 126 02/19 2128 2228 Cooper Adams Hydrogen or water addition at 2145 2258 2358 Congdon (2" or 60 gal. effect). No log entry. Not included in calculation. 127 02/21 0836 0936 Blessing Scheimann No water or hydrogen additions. 1006 1106 Frederick 128 02/23 1107 1207 Hartman Hoyt Feed and bleed operation of 150 gal. 1237 1337 Bocher between 1130 and 1155. Water addition of 150 gal. logged in CR0 Log at 1135. An additional 150 gal. was added between 1155 and 1200 as part of a second feed and bleed. Net
, effect of both feed and bleed , operations +160 gal. accounting for low gross leak rate. Not included in calculation.
02/25 ---- ---- Hartman*/ Hoyt* CR0 Log entry for 1334 " Late entry RC
---- ---- Booher* 1eak rate 2301-301 Long Form Calcu-Blessing lation perfonned sat. Unidentified
.87 gpm."
- Assumptions based upon shift composition.
129 02/25 2002 2102 Coleman Miller Water addition of 200 gal. at 2117 2217 Olson 2058. CR0 Log states 150 gal. added at 2058. Calculation includes 150 gal. (50 gal. difference). Note: i Water added 4 mins. prior to end of ' test. 130 02/26 0038 0138 Congdon Adams Water addition or hydrogen addition 0143 0243 Cooper at 0045 (3" or 90 gal. effect). No I log entry. Not included in l calculation. 131 02/26 1839 1939 Coleman Miller Water addition of 180 gal. at 1922. I 1954 2054 Olson CR0 Log states 150 gal. added at I 1935. Calculation includes 154 gal. (26 gal, difference). Note: Water was added 17 mins. prior to end of test. Test begun during feed and bleed l i 132 02/27 2150 2250 Coleman Miller 2255 2355 Coleman operation approximately 122 gal. bled. Water additions of 60 gal, and l 150 gal. at 2205 and 2230. CR0 Log i states 162 gal. at 2245. Calculation ' includes 162 gal. (48 gal, difference). However, since water l ' bled was not included in calculations, the overall leak rate l was lower than calculated. l t - - - . - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
e TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 18 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Comments (times are clock time) 133 02/28 1909 2009 Olson Miller Water addition of 150 gal. at 2005. 2159 2259 Wright CR0 Log states 100 gal. added at 2005. Calculation includes 100 gal. (50 gal. difference). Note: Water added 4 mins. prior to end of test. 134 03/01 0041 0141 Congdon Adams Hydrogen addition at 0130 (effect 1 0435 0535 Congdon on test results uncertain). CR0 Log states hydrogen addition at 0130. Note: hydrogen addition 11 mins. prior to end of test. 1357 03/02 0146 0246 Cooper Adams Possible jogged water addition of ; 0701 0801 Cooper 30-60 gal. between 0152 and 0215.
~
1367 03/02 1935 2035 Blessing Hoyt Possible jogged water addition 0255 0355 8lessing or hydrogen addition at 2025 (3" or 90 gal. effect). No log entry. Not included in calculation. Note: addition made 10 min. prior to end of test. 137 03/03 0238 0338 Olson Hitz* Water addition of 200 gal. at 0335. 0238 0338 Olson CR0 Log states 150 gal, added at 0335. Calculation includes 152 gal. (48 gal. difference). Note: water added 3 min. prior to end of test.
*Hitz was shift D SS.
138 03/04 0142 0242 Coleman Miller Water addition of 270 gal, at 0240. 0212 0312 Coleman CR0 Log states 238 gal. added at 0240. Calculation includes 238 gal. (32 gal. difference). Note: water added 2 min. prior to end of test. 139 03/05 0320 0420 Olson Miller Water additions of 100 gal, and 210 0350 0450 Olson gal. 0405 and 0410. CR0 log states 128 gal. added at 0410. Calculation includes 128 gal (182 gal. difference). Note: water added 10 min. prior to end of test. 140 03/06 0321 0421 Wright Miller Water addition of 210 gal. at 0420. , 0351 0451 Olson CR0 Log states 180 gal. added at 0420. Calculation includes 180 gal. (30 gal, difference). Note: water added 1 min. prior to end of test. l.
e TMI-2 Leak Rate Tests (09/30/78-03/28/79) Page 19 Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Connents (times are clock time) 141 03/08 0306 0406 Olson Miller Water addition of 250 gal. at 0403. 6306 0406 Wright CR0 Log states 228 gal. added at 0403. Calculation includes.228 gal. (22 gal. difference). Test was begun during the later half of a feed and bleed operation. Note: water 'added 3 min. prior to end of test. 142 03/09 0323 0423 Wright Hitz* Water additions of 180 gal. and 60 0323 0423 Olson gal. at 0425 and 0420. CR0 Log states 180 gal. added at 0415. Calculation includes 181 gal. (59 gal, difference). Note: water added 8 min. and 3 min. prior to end of test.
- Shift Supervisor-Shift D.
143 03/10 0351 0451 Hartman Hoyt Water addition (jogged) of 80 gal. 0351 0451 Booher starting at 0440. No log entry. Not included in calculation. Note: addition started 11 min. prior to end of test. 144 03/12 0132 0232 Booher Miller */ Water addition (jogged) of 100 gal. 0132 0232 Blessing Hoyt* starting at 0150. No log entry. Not included in calculation.
- Miller signed test sheet; hewever, test done on Hoyt's watch and logged in SF log by Hoyt.
145 03/13 0200 0300 Hartman Hoyt Water additions (jogged) of 30 and 60 0140 0240 Booher gal. at 0230 and 0250. No log entries. Not included in calculation. Note: last water addition started 10 mins, prior to end of test. 146 03/13 1105 1205 Olson Miller Water addition of 330 gal. at 1200. 1050 1150 Coleman CR0 Log states 305 gal. added at 1200. Calculation includes 305 gal. (25 gal, difference). Note: water added 5 min. prior to end of test.
' ~
TMI-2 LEAK RATE TESTS Page 2-(09/30/78-03/28/79) Test No. Oate Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Coments (times are clock time) 147 03/14 '205 1 1305 .111jes Conaway Water additions of 350 and 210 gal. 1200 1300 Kidwell at 1235 and 1250. CR0 Log states 300 and 200 gal. added at 1230 and 1250. Calculation includes 500 gal. (100
- gal. difference). Note: last water addition 15 min. prior to end of test. The 500 gal. addition was included in the calculation in the wrong step, i.e., water deletions not i water additions.
148 03/15 0450 0550 Booher Smith
- Wateraddition(jogged)of100 gal.
# 0445 0545 Blessing Hoyt* starting at 0525. No log engry. Not included in calculation.
- Smith (SS) i signed approval space on test sheet; l however. Hoyt (SF) recorded results in the Shift Foreman's Log.
149 03/16 2009 2109 Faust Scheimann Water additions of 120 gal. and 120 1944 2044 Frederick gal. at 2045 and 2050. CR0 Log states 200 gal. addition at 2050. Calculation includes 204 gal. (36 gal, difference). 150 03/17 0248 0348 McGovern Guthrie Water addition of 240 gal, at 0323. 0223 0323 Hemila- CR0 Log states 200 gal, added at 0323. Calculation includes 207 gal. (33 gal. difference). 03/18 0847 0947 111jes* Conaway* Strip chart marked at 0847., "84" LR 0822 0922 or Mell* 9 0847. Strip chart marked at 0947, Kidwell "LR out 71." Possible hydrogen addition and feed and bleed operation during test. No log entry. No test results retained.
- Assumptions based upon shift composition. i 151 03/19 0058 0158 McGovern Guthrie Water addition of 220 gal. at 0100. 4 0053 0153 Hemila Only 90 gal. was added during test.
Water addition of 240 gal. at 0157. CR0 Log entries inicude 200 gal. at j 0100 and 200 gal. at 0157 Calculation includes 200 gal. (130 gal, difference). Note: last water addition 1 min. prior to end of test. 152 03/21 0114 0214 Hemila Guthrie Water addition of 210 gal at 0126. l I 0114 0214 Germer ~CR0 Log states 200 gal, added at 0126. Calculation includes 207 gal. Hydrogen addition at 0205. CR0 Log states h Effect2{drogenadditionat0205. or 60 gal. Note: hydrogen added 9 min. prior to end of test.
} THI-2 LEAK RATE TESTS Page 2 (09/30/78-03/28/79)
Test No. Date Start Stop Test /CR0 Approved Coments (times are clock time) 153 03/22 0300 0400 McGovern Guthrie Water addition of 60 gal. at 0311. 0255 0355 Hemmila No log entry. Water addition of 240 gal. at 0353. CR0 Log states 200 added at 0353. Calculation includes 200 gal. (100 gal. difference). Note: last water addition 7 min. prior to end of test. 154 03/24 0540 0640 Congdon*/ Adams **/ Water additions of 100 gal. at 0600 0538 0638 Faust
- Scheimann** and 0630. CR0 Log states 100 gal.
Frederick at 0600 and 0630. Calculation includes 206 gal. (differense of +6
- s. gal). Note: last water addition made 10 min. prior to end of test.
*Congdon signed test; however, test was done on Shift A (assume Faust ran test). ** Adams approved test and logged in SF log; however, test was done on Shift A.
155 03/25 0525 0625 Frederick Scheimann Water addition of 300 gal at 0608. 0523 0623 Faust CR0 Log states 300 gal. added at 0608. Calculation includes 301 gal. (differenceof+1 gal.) 156 03/28 0134 0234 Faust Miller */ Water addition of 320 gal, at 0145. 0134 0234 Frederick Scheimann* CR0 Log states 303 gal added at 0145. Calculation includes 303 gal. (17 gal difference).
- Miller signed test; however, test was done on Shift I A.
l E-----------
Table 10 Updated: 07/30/85 Leak Rate Tests By Evaluation Category Breakdown of the number of leak rate surveillance tests exhibiting
.^
b 3 , questionable characteristics. J Number % of Tests ( Characteristic that makes test questionable of tests Retained Test with no apparent problem 50 31% Unstable instrument used as input to computer 42 26% Water additions not included in calculation 22 14% Water additions not fully included in calculation 17 11% Feed and bleed operations during test ~ 15 9% Hydrogen additions 12 7% Unstable plant conditions during test 10 6% Water or hydrogen addition (unable to differentiate) 7 4% Results greater than 1 gpm which were retained. 6 4%
. Note: A total of 161 tests were retained durin'g the period 09/30/78 and DT/T8/79. Of these 14 fall into two categories and 3 fall into three categories. ,
Tabulation of leak rate tests by evaluation category. The Shift performing the test is indicated beside.the test number. If more than one shift was involved, the shift letter for each shift involved is listed. No Apparent Unstable Water Additions Feed & Bleed Water or Hydrogen Problem Instrument (not included) Operations Additions 1D '31 B 12 F/A/E 6 C 7T
- 2C 33 D 14 C/D 7 L' *87 B 3D 34 F/E/B 18 C *12E C 121 F 4 E/B 35 D 24 C *29 C 125 B '
5C . *36 C/D *28 B *43 C 126 C 8C 37 C *36 C/D *58 F/C/B 130 C 11 B 41 F/E *50 D/F *72 E 136 E 15 C *43 C *S6 B/E 97 E 16 B 44 C *71 B/F 106 F Leak Rate Exceeds 19 C- 45 B/F *72 E 110 B T5 Limit of 1 opm
/ 20 A 47 8 *77 E 111 F/C 12A A L ( 21 A 48 C 78 D 112 C 12B D 22 A/B *50 D/F *92 B 128 E 12C E/F 25 A 51 0 94 E 132 D 12D C 26 C 52 E/F 98 A *141 D *12E C 30 D/A- 53 C 114 8 13 C I 32 B *S6 B/E 115 B Hydrogen 38 D - *S8 F/C/B 135 C Additions 42 C 59 C 143 E 17 F/E 46 D/B/A 61 E/F 144 E/D 23 B 49 C 64 F/A/E 145 E *36 C/D 1 54 D 66 0 148 E 39 C 55 C *69 B/F 63 E 57 D *70 0 Water Additions *69 8/F 60 D *71 B/F (only partially 119 B 65 F/E *72 E included) 120 C 67 E 73 F/A 93 D 23 min 123 B a 68 E/C 74 F/A 122 0 13 min 124 8 79 C/D 75 E 129 D 4 min 134 C 81 A/F 76 B/F 131 0 17 min 152 F 88 D *77 E 133 D 4 min j 89 C 80 C/A 137 0 3 min Unstable <
95 C 82 C 138 D 2 min Plant 99 F 83 A 139 D 10 min Conditions 100 B 84 A 140 D i 1 min 9 B 101 F 85 A *141 D i 3 min 10 A 102 A 86 C 142 D (3 min 27 C 103 F *87 B 146 D I, Sminj *28 B 104 B/E 90 B 147D(15 ming *29 C ' 105 A 91 B 149 A i19minJ *31 B 107 F *92 B 150F(24 min) 40 F/E i n
- 109 F 96 F/E I *70 D f -
113 A 151F(1 153 F ( 7 minmin)*77 E i 116 F 108 C/A 117 8 (time shown is ; 118 A the time before 127 A/E end of test that i 154 A/C water was added) I 155 A i 156 A/D *1dentifies tests that fall into more than one category. 1 l j
Table 12 Updated: 07/30/85 QUICK LOOK
SUMMARY
OF TMI-2 LEAK RATE TESTS 09/30/78 TO 03/28/79 M No. Evaluation Perform No. Evaluation Perform No. Evaluation Perform SEPTEMBER 1978 DECEMBER 1978 (CONT) FEBRUARY 1979 (CONT) 1 OK DD D 55 OK C C 115 WAN BB B OCTOBER 1978 56* LT/WAN BB E 116 OK (05)F(05) 2 OK CC C .57 OK D D 117 OK BB B 3 OK , DD D 58* LT/F&B CF B 118 OK AA 5 A 4 OK EE B 59 LT C C 119 H B . B' 5 OK CC C 60 OK DD D 120 H CC C 6 F&B CC C 61 LT EF E 121 WorH FF F 7 F&B DD D 62 WorH C C 122 WAP DD D 8 OK CC C 63 H EE E 123 H B B 9 USPC BB B 64 LT AF E 124 H BB B 10 USPC AA A 65 OK EF - E 125 WorH BB B 11 OK BB B 66 LT D D 126 WorH CC C 12 WAN AF E 67 OK EE E 127 OK AE A 12A igpm AA A 68 OK E C 128 F&B EE E 128 Igpm DD D 69* LT/H BF B 129 WAP DD D 120 Igpm EE F 70* LT/USPC DD D 130 WorH CC C , 12D Igpm CC C 71* LT/WAN BF B 131 WAP DD D 12E* Igpm/F&B CC C 72* LT/WAN/F&B EE E 132 F&B D D 13 Igpm C C 73 LT AF F 133 WAP DD D 14 WAN CD C 74 LT AF F MARCH 1979 l 15 OK CC C 75 LT EE E 134 H C C 1 16 OK BB B 76 LT BF B 135 WAN C C 17 H E F 77* LT/WAN/USPC EE E 136 WorH E E 18 WAN CC C 78 WAN D D 137 WAP D D 19 OK CC C 79 OK CD C 138 WAP 0 D A ' 20 OK AA A 80 LT ACC C 139 WAP - D D f '21 OK AA A 81 OK AA F 140 WAP' DD D 22 OK AAB A 82 LT . C C 141* WAP/F&B DD D 23 H BB .B JANUARY 1979 142 WAP DD D 24 WAN CC C 83 LT AA A 143 WAN EE E 25 OK AA A 84 LT AA A 144 WAN EE D/E 26 OK CC C 85 LT AA A 145 WAN EE E 27 USPC C C 86 LT C , C 146 WAP DD D 28* WAN/USPC BB B 87* LT/WorH B B 147 WAP BB B 29* F8B/USPC CC C 88 OK DD D 148 WAN EE E/E 30 OK DD A 89 OK C C 149 WAP AA A 31* LT/USPC BB B 90 LT BB B 150 WAP FF F NOVEMBER 1978 91 LT BB B 151 WAP FF F 32 OK BB E 92* LT/WAN B B 152 H FF F 33 LT DD D 93 WAP DD D 153 WAP FF F 34 LT BEF F 94 WAN EE E 154 OK AAC C 35 LT DD D 95 OK C C 155 OK - AA A 36* LT/WAN/H CCD C 96 LT EEF E 156 OK AA D 37 LT C C FEBRUARY 1979 Key: 38 OK DD D 97 F&B EE E Igpm-Results greater than Igpm. 39 H CC C 98 WAN AA A WAN-Water Add. Not included. 40 USPC EF F 99 OK , FF F WAP-Water Add. Part. Included. 41 LT EF F 100 OK BB B H-Hydrogen. DECEMBER 1978 101 OK FF F LT-Unstable Instrument 42 OK CC C 102 OK AA A USPC-Unstable Plant Condtions. 43* LT/F&B CC C 103 OK FF F F&B-Feed & Bleed Operation. 44 LT C C 104 OK BB E WorH-Water or Hydrogen. 45 LT BF B 105 OK AA A OK-No Apparent Problems. 46 OK BD A 106 F&B FF F O 47 LT BB B 107 OK FF F Totals: 48 LT CC C 108 USPC AC A 49 OK CC C 109 OK FF F OK 50 31% H 12 7% 50* LT/WAN DF D 110 F&B BB B LT 42 26% USPC 10 6% 51 LT C C 111 F8B FF C WAN 22 14% WorH 74% 52 LT EF E 112 F&B C C WAP 17 11% Igpm 64% 53 LT C C 113 OK AA A F&B 15 9% 54 OK DD D 114 WAN BB B
9
' - . . _ . . . . . . . _ _ . ~ _ . . . . _ _ . _.
/
r
- STOP 0 . . _ . . _ . . .. .....,.._....__..__......__..._... . _ . . _ . . _ .
I _.4.c s 1 O DATE: 9L3008 17:33:34 g $ b EACTOR._ COOLANT LEAKAGE TEST . TIME: SP 2301-301 - q v NOTE: IF OPERATOR ACTION DECREASES RCS VOLUME THE DATA ENTRY FOR Tl[AT AC O . O _ _ . DESIRED INTERVAL _(_1-8 200RC) _. O ENTER THE INITI AL REACTOR COOLANT DRAIN TANK LEVEL FROM PATCH PANEL DVMf 64
'2.16 ENTER THE FINAL REACTOR COOLNiT DRAIN TANK LEVEL FROM PATCH PANEL DVl4864 0 2.21 _.
ENTER OPERATOR _CA_U. SED._CtW4GES .TO THE.RCDT_ F.R0'4. DS. 4 (2301-301) _ 0 O ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHANGES FROM DS 4 (2301-3D1) -
~
0
- ENTER IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE FROM DS 3 (2301-3D1) (GR4) 0 ENTER PRIMARY TO . SECONDARY _0.TSG_ TUBE _ LEAK (GRi) .,_ .._.___
0 O _ . TIME TCA THA TCB TH3 TAVE PRZR LVL MUTK LVL RCDT LVL O (F) (F) (F) (F) (F) (IN) (IN) (VOLT) 17:34:15: 570.773 591.375 571.031 591.852 581.250 226.047 82.724 2.160 0 81.203 _._2.210_. 18:34:15.: 571.055 591.422__571.227.. 591.875 581.391 227.209 m u
~ ~ ~ ~
O GROSS LEAK RATE (<30 GR4): 1.0403 GR4
. _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . _ . . . _-_._c O~ TOTAL IDENTIFIED RCS LEAK RATE (<10 GR4): 0.1455 GR4
.~,....
EAK RATE (<1 GR4): 0.8954 GR4
. O -v NET. UNIDENT
-:, PERATO 7
. APPROVED: _ . . _ . . _ . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._
.w .:. -
'-g.....7-
. /[.
E 'O _ . . . _ .
^
l --
,-- ..m y ..
- - - - _ - _ _ _ - -- - _ -___ __- . _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ .-- _-- - _ _ _ . - - _ - _ _ = _ _ - - _ _ _
. - wwO .
-.,r- w g ; ; ,. u ;r k -
1
...............,.;...a....... .,.v .y. -
,... u.,...
289 ) IN ' j. ! 1, z sj.sv19 23av- t: * * < N.,.. ~.+frl*<
) 3ce /?t'fe's'f(l Ylt
- kO C ,s/, /,e ) aa bl$.s ,'/,. f, e m .m & s % p-v,r cs ,s ;. . r.. .: ,,,,,
f:it .a "<' (s. rr t ,
.1
.~~ o%.lr ,, w it , rs f. t .,,
g& AsfW ' - us ! T ccs . fc . $ Sfr c ru en,e r 2vi.!,y,, ie,r.s _
. .a v,1 a n. . , in << r c. n > ' 6 .o er :/a . .zt -
k'5 @. /I'/,ay.n d& ' C ?ON.eu3-i ,.M*'sW
.. a L3t({u...~
QllD.2 WO< ~s N WEl At Y s p&.bf& u
+!
< )3<2 */, ~CMr' Miai.e.~
Ec)s Ccrnf c toll S~ Nite & t' ti' i Sir t'/N Co-f'~'8 ty sn3 ' cs ,flt bc.l 2 3c.I- ? N . b 213 CI'ar e u.v.w o **.co t+.rar gMa :0N (.,..<.,, c,,e
,d . .-,,
t si; :; yr.< ir' .:.s Tuttw i a a.t .: n.y i ?.tr a . ~ z
- s-l I l c-l y :+ +-' C* ? ;
c1r5 .St< urEO cv G!c s pa-<i {
, u s y. 3rry. .~p c=i l' I iv~e.**. < ,~ c:a,g,s. .Jra *.;.' w s
}
o .~43 3 n.19i D Eo= -f-I k. es r 6,.,/)!e lenf 9 Rc 3 - #130 B _ if by,; Ca f I,lecl D 3M* '? i. g ) .. oft? fl S & c'c y ,a t- c.?r b // *? ? st
< r
. . . . . . . 01v aca .:.:/*G Al}, ,. u.p,?n D' 000
~ ma *vs.u Ca bbek AL+ dfsc/m d mW& Cd ofr Plc-cul ocits V c/ a/8 #b% cAuw <awh & N 0 'l Y s
015I Yrou AU '
\ -
joer iscovw} 1I y J * /l dx n.h /7 $ l S/7 fem DW Gr lo fw U *~ ?! I~I'1 i
- lln CllD lo Mtc ~
aj, n J;/ zocL, Wi!) h"l4 @!*
,1sq p. .
Ikw AL f j ' fi. Y hW Ay/ { - a ,, , . s . _ s i,. a L J : s- e r
*kn d a.,d w u M w m &b " GIL M W, ~m~' ' 't'e
&an ,
Ie6 gg&y7r '-S m's 9/s c&,'A 6 U~< In c-?"'C .
.s b. .+,
iU 3 % M 1'c-/* If> , f ebe.I s'v^'! l' 'b* ' " '" ? (
- t iWO
%~AidedJS#hk'/S!]!V)WA!f5*f#~Y' W I1/4 .
-/d i s' # '
- 4.C. I69.1 c.,.,. . 6f., z.392 !/ ,S'f^Nl"~ 'l * ,. I' e .
N 4
--.a.. _. t . 2 _-_ c=m. . . . m *"~' ""~Y ~~~' ~~T * ~~ Y ~~ % -- - - 2:7 ( * ----wws.m, e. ~.
1-j , 3lj,0
' , 94 I L flN A. -
k m y'no-wi, M n u. e V. u- A
',33g " isG. mG&??A.t20y.f}J.cT,1!6L
.+ s tBSS? U fsiyt fjyr)gCQhyE//M,fa,ufq,f. .
/ 9's y
;. i- c l
.uusn i,wd y,> l.&(mln.w MCI lytr.'encoth ,'er je. rs wk b nw. IshE Hr , 4 h o f A'F b [f [bustbit' l'off'r5 Yo b YWf t *'Ys'~n .
' 6O,
,,21) O CO -f ~/C sieha>, s.rle cl<~tnf fr skwn }bt'2bMs 32IS Co-P lC % hN 0%. cfM. M/~n w //o!* <b' NW b'N'b~'A. 7:<. rs L 12 6n
; eagm M;ctA JEM,9454TNJEM/h . .r. r, 4. a u,J
.# .. 'L 5 7. 4~~ [4
'n:
'+ _, oo.k,
.. eiw 6).
" 0/Yo (c e 1.J s'~ Sr
. - . . o w. v.
. en S Of
-. O Y/5""
I. 0% 24
'8' _. ,
S.c i
. . . OYVQ .
i .. Ofto 141 2 ,
'.*, . 0 61*' ? l..
l I. 0 ?c .:- .ry ;-J l f I l
- . 0"? E W- 9 l ,
l I
- i
_ vf3/ E. f
~
.. / 0 / '( A s.
f! . //p.' ,f. , j i
,3 ._ 17'i~ c4c.
g
/31*/ g,4., l.
.. ,;59
/vp 3 /7
( . 5
.. '/4/6 li b ...- t r/- 3 .L
- ... ivv 3 c, 3'll , F'g. }
t .;t ',. twr. 4 8 h .
"q . ._,
l'/ 5 3, A' ' {;'i Y.,{i, f
. X,. . . . . s. (Too /d 1 ,
!v U- . . . _ . . . . 3 DP. #f');
-. w .m..m.~._ _ . _ . .
1
.e,.e
.me y .o. p' ec e se ..qem,a ase. -
e 4 .& . n @4 s n oic ow-. : Li g n h" e or ,. w 4 .c..po
-i Fl , y: rp e 4e - '
h* I [.h',.ll
! .b) .
hh b fi
.! h.l.h y ."ol ib.'n !. Y. ..'
U d a[;
~
C4 l I n J i"Ql0M.jih k. . -V
,. ?"- 9,. qg .q'"H Lh f Il'q Pl'<qhpf
~M g
- 7. h! Q.'hj,J r,. s
,N d o' i .
1.. ..
.l .
O i 1 p J + .
,j ] ij "i' jy h U qi.
- j ijg d, W'j, h s"'! 1 'e 4 Ti 44,m'eMinr.....o.i l - N un V) ...- H - -
.- i t gnloti'i J i
!iJ l12 n .h.! 6
.D '
il ni ..ol .,mm-r"
- p. !
. , ,,g , , . , ,
Y " f' l l , i f' h! ! b[j t A%. j .i ; .m@s,W@ t.4h!jij0![!%j
@i p;l!p i $i - 4 n
s I i 1 N -
.. . ... % . d . i
.s
# , wu - ;- 7 ap! g' o.n h i .H i
u in y gkp' y u ,q ;,s 4 iol u wk a . n
'n ,.< p n 4 c
.u r yf.
i le pn k; J, .k i l I .q -
.,q c3h; l
( r ..
- m 'r. h 4 k,J 4 : b[.i kW;- bm islh ih< - ,
~ j:. ,
.. ;,' ,.r .: q ,
c, m
<"g 7. ac,ylTw,,;;jjgp! p- im ! q'3 l ; ij
,,, ~,
f ' r' "hh <-
< - , l i
- p. N i 1 .i 'l j, L
.h ol i
fJ e c- e-.:: ;J : ! > d i
.t L /' li- l al ,' "" J,lh:l.,j0p :p l1 e! :ii g i! 'm
,: 1 H .
g onl,) g (; p ; y g ll l; t ? . 4. ' p' 's . ; , i I [l e i j%
# * #~ " ! ;"
..; l ! l !j 4 !j q !
l ,, l' i l
!i v alir a ..[l!I Il q; ;i l
i e' 3. dl l II ,i l,i h' l! i di' b; ll'l
! , l -
ll j r: : .0/ . h, @,is.'pl f s:. ln q Li h!i .l l _j UT .I] t<l y,,li t. ..
' A.,i .- I -;. !d '
+>W l hjel l ,H 3-l ,l
. I h ,-l' i t z
. I
- u. 5'[4 ! .. n! j h..j, p;h'
, I Y f l[pill @ jI %,
&hlh *q
- [ '
N! k ! t! 4 IT m' ? ' h' pg e z .4.H
~
m p LCila Aso H..wh.4iMjb:f.Jy 1 v H >> .
,Tj%17 f w
\ x "
I ' I a l I
? gi
;gi"i.4um'- j{. ,.,gS4.";- Fi"44}
m 9d: 'i .n': r o . i i n/ h- i , d i ,~ h 9. i l l 1 1. p' I 'II ' -
- .M x$ !il
,hh ']wiil hh fj f !d l p l E,%[a p 3 ,
'@ @ 3 [i il l i W ili S :p 7iji i!nnh] T Rii i~
rihpin gg j mg4 c u Rv.: WQg .w 2 r; o pa i gg a m.n pil y d4 c - *n se < ; 14 . L;lp p'!.um
. #+
@, g jH jii ! j!j ido Qngl Mi - .A r
- u. ... n,.e . n m
, -- .2 . n ;.w.o w- Kle. ae t. a
, - .e.. r 4kMe, dj ..A h,T.
'p' ,
- > hl
- . - - i-- '
lia. O l* lilj .'U1 51t e i d.$.id,
-t.5,8 j;U lfi 'jp pil
,j m -o es oli,! n /c W lr>19. . . IR.t o- i..n ..n M,o ic , ,. ,
d i I ' j &
...)
.- r.%..-or50 i
iipi k .' $. .,.. y.r;.lt ip;;:
< ,- h;,r.i '-
~
2 4 ,
";l.; d."N:
ii.a i l ,I .,,I,M I , q' -
- oggF- r ,, p.. p. . . ..! "L.a i .
. ! in I .1'.'. J
~ :. I. >.,", .
~N s; M a' g g ; mu i"en"MMgppo,' nikuuhicul'm HVHlaluh! Ihl , -
' ~
;3 h .L'jlf"'h[i @y'"91!
'q $ .
. io f:.i.
,r r ~
- p. . g,g.I h ;l-Q4, .
, . :]{"U]lj q..A 2 I
e 3 .. . t- L 1 ., 2!'. '!Q
.t
.e l, 4 'I g' y h
a ,' ! j .q. l I!l ! l' di H 3 m H m s!! "f..nu o h.l A onm.g"ll 4 . p i li%i,n
-1 ;,m !
7l. , . gg.. p'. Pl l
@H l i !j j'l l
I l P a e .
*W r 4lh.
. i
- p. 7m..wy
.. ~ . . . i .
4 l ,., - l .
. Jm m u
*uu J
+-
mo
- - ~
.t- - -
'; /* . f e.f. ' t, H .' I lj j l I i ll H .l l ...n.n. , #. +
.l. [ vm.
. 0 i , m..
l . . . r . .
*$. . . . .w . . . . .3 b.
F[ I
- l
.l l N ,
y l l e '. Q* '
,j 5.'. $ &:f.:;%.',-?.:
T +- w h u... w A?;.,...
. ,.?. .,
il gg }4*irj'g g- ?> g
. ' me hil- , I , ,,
N t w a.' . 1 I-- n- exi.'i -Giem e,m om i Vecn d mocom.c. i 9, 2 ,. .s h .. a r,' j]' ;j61 7'jj lyrp;' , sW - '*,!![ - - I i nrw 4 83h# lid O l 4EMM @ddM t e w ws w% d@ JR M "wal a
.N
0 c
.c __. ...________
res) .
~
DATE: 9/30/78 REACTOR COOLANT LEAKAGE TEST O TlME: 23:19:43jgtJ SP 2301-3D1 O NOTE: IF OPERATOR ACTION DECREASES RCS VOLUME Tird DATA ENTRY FOR THAT ACTION MUST BE NEGAT o___/ DESIRED INTERVA'L (1-8 HOURS) 01 ENTER THE INITI AL___R_EACTOR COOLA!JT_DRAltLTANK. LEVEL.FROM_ PAT.CH PANEL..DVMfG4
- r2.4 O ENTER THE FINAL REACTOR COOLANT DRAIN TANK LEVEL FRO'4 PATCH PANEL DVMfG4 2.45 ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHANGES TO THE RCDT FROM DS 4 (2301-3D1) 00 ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHANGES FROM DS 4..(2301-3D1). __
0
- O ENTER IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE FROM DS 3 (2301-3D1) (GR4)
~
) ENTER PRIMARY TO SEC'fiDAR '675G TUBE LEAK (UR4)
O TIME TCA THA TC8 THB TAVE PRZR LVL MUTK LVL RCDT LVL - (F) (F) (F) (D _( F.) _ (IN) _ _( I N ) .(VOLT) -_ O 23:23: 6: 571.555 591.445 571.320 591.641 581.484 225.330 79.082 f 2.400 i 0:23: 6: 571.172 591.188 570.898 591.359 581.148 227.893 75.554 2.450 O i _ ._ _. _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ j -O ~ :
- 0. 80'4 2 GR4 _ ._, . ___ _ , _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _
__GR_0SS_LE_AK__ RATE _(_{30 GR4) : . _. _ . . . O
- . _- TOTAL,_LDEliT_lEIED .RCS LEAK RATE..(<10 GR4): . ,_ _ 0.1556 GR4._
O _ h_
~'1__HE.T._UNIDENII.FI ED. LEAK 8' ATE (<1 GR4): _ _ . _ _ _ _ .
. 0.6485 GR4 _ . . . . _ .. . _ _ ..___ , _ .
'L':n -
. O.-OPERATOR: M __
.g 4 . _.
= _.
. . _ _ . _ _ . ~ .......
f
-@#~ _. ~ -
% ~= _ _,
. '^'.*
. . .; . a .s . .
.mwwmA' :
>},
s .;
.[ 9'IP' // / I b '
\s u 2 < Ici.>a d % -. .s L g
.;,u,p,i'!Lfce.
- e. cl.li. s s,p.g.a'.
' Y*'.$W'
, sy' /o# 14 7, ' t3 >so<v >/ 97 d. dps ssg J.Q % 9, /-c A >~ % , Cp., c/7 4 gr ib,' q, e ,,l y.y.
g, ys ,w,,., ,. i n< t ><c~ i .. t e..a _ , >~ e .. _m , O n ><sT - 84;. '? " 1rs /o,4 s*1 s t*, Kc. I t,ptt;<}Lis, r.s r t. nasr v' re>v r--* i ; ys roe ls. B u ST ~
' M '**f'*I PJkey/
i 11.11 11-1* uu- fo- pt- 4d 1- w r . s. i . es, ,i a ne aycyli t n:s a. ofws. <wms <p4..r. u:q.
.f .
.. , w w w;p,MeJ - MsW,0 o ,1.> &c. seco d u (
eivo d'o a <. d e< t.1 > y nL ~a cfas.w l.as . ; e vs- Sae. Cu &.~dwa j; I
. . . o ty. 241. dad A&'-(214 j L o , secaned juit. l A.ia } t'e eso S/,,.ded sf-Ai/? (Q u.. fan) .
0YT' O . S' S - 8 / A I 0% 24~ kla ./ .1-./ c.la.e al se// /*/' f < f'e.< s , o<</wed lo
,,^). ..
.n v:<< ,
v .
. .. - .-- - m ,-~. 4 %,;. y;
, /gy(.,( w. fW, . ,,,.7., m-
. . . - . . . p 01co tRJt1&j,. 75 4f ,q s .,.f.v4, ,._,. n, d ,1 0'~ ~ * ~
...... osn l' L.. .. <t -
z.< , , ,. n ,.-tc;.. .. p : a a. co. I# # b-se % h. /=s. sk% s #[
. - . . . . . 01)i W ul.h w at 1* r it 5 3 te. i
- ... . ..._ ._ . vf3/ .f ,_ , u, (> ./-r t 4 %.
. . . . . 10 t 't 0 L<w/ It L sqs t1 M~ 0.r s & f& .
. . . . . //0! Sse. / s~* . s.::tT;,a., .;"Y t 3 b' 'j0s&u n'Os /ft ,
. . - . . 179 8~ v.rus c..v a rggn c s .v . co ,3 ,
.-.- -. . . .. 13 1 'l ct.o r .A, c./, ,. ,2 / yt p. . -s ,e it l'a* $ s
.t.i J,u ..., , s p. .t s.' AeJ
. . . . Ivo 3 19 MS ..Q ,,.< .f.
. /'l/ 4 66f3 . ,, s - d /hf , - -A . ,
-- N W A k W L N t*b ( Ap M #L l' M :? % - a l'1'f 3 I; 6 r 3- cu+ q ,.,.. . d i L* ,, .*.
f $
.dh%av ;
O,+
'*" 9 rc> 4 3 '~ ^ 4 mr A., A on J $4'1f5, u
O ITM Ai_d b"US.',
Ma.r A B ywbWs n O "R f S'. 1
'707 #fx/J -
., e se a.= =s_ ,=sem8"-*'
5 -N 4
W -! 'o l j 1 6 j e i piq, n pli :p;i
.c o cu g .tic i' d d.L ..e C oi3 4 I. '
L ^
""W' e ;,, i 3 i
< t .' . c l lq I; 3j 4. t.gl; q ,) ' p'Q .,;, [ L' . i p ,.d.
; -; ..M '
b [ g-i h- d_hh.h m 6._.i,M i@% mi i .%_ ? ._ d.#c
.. ! h d
1y p. 6 a I' n . r 3 p rk : 11 m m, .e.La mi.,ie
, . . .. g glr ,n . ,t .. r r : .~.3 J i w g g ,
( I liL l li91 f[I.illhrfl!IIn.lIIM.i il ; i!ld: ,! . fij y 'ig
..l-W i
f l ;
' l%+;
191 n p!!N i L J 'll6 il e.;nk Slpt. Iq 41(+l,. i i
.o; lipa~
Uf[Q.k :
, . , :'4,c3 l 99 hi i e -
j: 4, o; ; [f' ~l{ il h Y
^ ' '
f Ih f[l ' * * -S m m . u, ~. -l s l l f b l sf N * , f* dn gi !!! a l 0 !, q ini ay
.- .c !pj
- ." I
.. . . . g i i. ce rn gy ,i ,. 3
.4- ,.i H o r i ,.
j f-i i. ni: " p' nc. e, .- i lll p V.p td,n,.'i i !: . c,ul q'd- b
' . <- w*
tih.lm. _j: i.
; i h"i g F i
e 1.;,h. 1 .ai
.e l7n a. wr ;l ! ! ioi qi.i: :
y j .g h cl h
~. l d, f f f i
h, pu, f l f
.i' i n , ;l .
. ,u ~ .
;' ,f.
f ; if ( 'l $. ll ! hll I j ! !': l h I !Il '
"y i]mMli llhi:lli n ffl ii I Iii ]in 4 I' 'ii , iii li ;l ! il l ,, - .i
- o. -
[' j
;i -
g e pg!,j g n on gg _. ryg
./. 5 b m"j i g !H r r j(jlf
..g m
'_hir
.g e
l[ r n .
.Ha"lH. _i .. .
T[y
, . . u , J; . 7i .
O 8' l l I IN i diq O b)! dl k o ' 5, ,.q,;'s g' jeE ei I
! ;d~
, i 3 "i '
g " ppj i ri !pfnP W y 6 g g. s'f;r jI l y,jp ti gr,Nlp!TQ ud 7[ i i Mi!!!ii iF '4
, .4: ga gO Cp i
]j.ll 7,q n[j op g! : ][, Wll gjggityiqq , , ,
i Q" 6,9 [m)H" ma 7.f ll lld'i hel i;l Pi
,..fi' .hi g,10 1
'l. ..114 l'l wn .
.4 hl .,li '! .s t i
.p h e
g g t"; OO a , , ,. c g ,. n .,r. . . e . g . , m- c- !
'. ozc.O
')
fl [ d] i
#il j yhl'l.l'. Hj
.c .o p; j l!U.lle liill[ b h.p:b.;ti: yl'i ',
i ,. h h .. d' '
' 2h I
t- l j.l ! iY.,!l!I .iii.i.l.!l ! .ij ' i.M~i.!j .,l.i.i.!$ i ,
., s- c d l k.- ,llli- l l l.h i
.I.U.i,l,$hP;l!
.t 9
0,ii.. ;! i. llh o
- .'l . If' Il,0 dliQ.; ,. l 0 - iiM
' r l.
YI $ i
.jl.",: ;;i.jg ;" pp r gi en - I
'h
$ o. en O ef;[l ' l[
I q.- - l
;n e
m ylAjh;p%p'- q .. ;,
= i
. - T. ,4 q ss u.a a s ym %o,iii lp a'!
y m
-er <c .. v l iii i
- u. I I i I'. I'. ' ii.d 'l"
; i -
@Md s" e' niw D' ,lip. W~I
"' '~
p '"F *n 4 n - e .. tu-; N I l H' - .'; w
."^*
#* 2 Ch :C t.L. Wg
-JOMMHU D-il' N . ' ve . v. . !
l! ie p i . M[- j' ' a !- l !! ! - llf'"i! l
- llp; "El i;t ,l il e ;I i 1 .
O i,! r u, t ' - .1 4' i ik Ii m .l !h : ,: j ! ! '!i I. b' '"
,li l u
.i i I! .
- F lir o! !.! ! ! P
!!! ij[ )' q I! {. i
, R
) [ I fl i!l! !f lip'N I!i INi$ CI'lh hc !$ $
i (l0 fh Eil lill!hk .
'j l i i nu ,
n; n r t
;,n qu "9 e nu m. m:n . .
l i I i- j o y i e!, url ip ' j i! I ! ll l l 9 h; q ' !l'
,i s 'c
' u 1 l 1
I l x 11 j ja gi li @ i hl I I . (J e
,q i u "l kh i Jh g 'h .
j l .i, .@;@k nl l hjih ipli h f .i
~
z - l 3 9a q i
~ ,
m' , n iin e L n. :pu
. i
- . m . m. . .
.cw, W- j pi un. x a w.,4 .+ ~>o%q,nru r a qhn,ep r. n,e u tu s
'im i
- m. s. --
. n.. ,1
.l. I' 'l N! [h diIN I l [;'l 1 9 11 *I . 2.!
O. b' b II ( l{ h--~ f+,h"h!- '"h' t 45Wo M % d W$ 4 m Ih i ; i.H m o: @'Mi% n: H i Ork, Q&.l4'.lR c .* di, "e lii~M,, h #hh -
%@e -
N e L' lf.'.:i l 'Hi l l I r - * *--- ig
-i--
s - .'4 ei n e i nl ;i .m 'o: 4.., p."lM: .:!!nn}f' 4 !N !!m '- A
9
. 4 OP 0 ,
rest DATE: 10/ 1/78 REACTOR C00LA'f7 LEtKAGE TEST O TIME: 19:29: 0hR SP 2301-301 O NOTE: IF OPERATOR ACTION DECREASES RCS VOLU4E THE DATA E!4TRY FOR THAT ACTIJ1 MUST BE NEG AT( _ _J q
~
DESIRED INTERVAL (1-8 H3URS) { O1 j. __ ENTER THE INITI AL.EEACIOR_ COOLANT _ DRAIN TANK LEVEL EROM.. PATCH PANEL DVM864 ._
- 12.72 e O ENTER THE FINAL REACTOR COOLANT DRAIN TANY, LEVEL FROM PATCH PAtlEL DVM864 2.75 ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHANGES TO THE RCDT FROM DS 4 (2301-301) i 00 !
ENTER _0RE BAIOR_CAUS ED _CMN GE S. . EROM ..D S_4..( 2301 -3 D1 ) . . . . _ . . _ . . _ . . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . .__. 1 0 j O ENTER IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE FR0'4 DS 3 (2301-3D1) (GRi) j 0 _ -_ _ _ .
.___ _ q ENTER PRilMRY TO SECONDARY OTSG TUBE LEAK (GR4) !
I b0 l O TIME TCA Tm TCS THB TAVE PRZR LVL MUTK LVL RCDT LVL f (IM) .___..(VOLT)_.- (F_) (E) (F). (F)_. .(F). (IN) q O 19:29:28: 571.141 591.055 571.023 591.344 581.133 224.377 71.606 2.720 20:29:28: 571.630 591.563 571.508 591.875 581.648 224.344 73.041 2.750
]
O . GROSS LEAK RATE. (<30 GRi): _.. _ _ _ _ _ . _. __ . 0.'2711 GR4 _ . . . _ . . _ . ._ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . O : _T.01A_L_LDEUTl_EIED RCS . LEAK RATE..(<10 GR4):_. , .0.0936 GR4 .._. .. . _. O^ l
._NEI_U4.l DENT I F I ED LEAK . RATE . (<1 GR4) : ...... . _. _._ 0.1775 GRi...._ _. .__.. . ._..__.)
. ~ . _
APPROVED: o w -- . . .___ .-... . - _.. _ . - _ . . . _ .
. w ;.g.;. .. . _
w- _ _ . . h w .e O.g
-e _ . _. ._ . . . . . _ . . . . . . .. . . . - . _ . ._
- ._.._.__._ l O".$ilw ? ue- .
. ._ y . . .
_ _ . .d
u J m=m=
,:. y -. - . .. .- .. - . . -
=-.m,.
, i i..
lD
. $~ll l0$ f s . /<' ?
1ros p A 6 n "c "R PS .- aw rd 151% %vruJt. - 6 '<
'C"A m f J *B*Rf5 IGO Pld 13
,gg. . gn ,s,..
, . ~g yq.y .
zu W. f.[f t V C,V/ $ rn 16co .. 4'ees 4 < tio.arlo', C. "fg'd'f. Co 6 E N , f A .. , At:ller :n d. l
!)01 ..
?a3r cre.3 'l 19 M *$ *Xf5 ,to n ov.ma.l. , 3a a eco *
/ L CA k.~ co
/J'.?O % d'.ashLe. n C /]- v'~.3 o oo n.- em
'tw 'BM5 to mahml b .
ea, l
/7 0 *d*AFS u w (prsS t
os co.
!154 'DRL. P S n -wM k.
,~ r uc .
i . wmR taco Vin e> n wi, I D" ' (D / f) /. % . k.,..I.c,!n.,. n .ol f '.i br .. c.; h i' LE.. er p..~
\._)
'? /2 Og
' w g
. 4 ~'/- 5 .Sb tl. .
h . 4-) j j /?ir . E//p & m'at (m&z. J, Aff . , , IMO /70 . h2M 4 - 718/ () l /H lh
- //?( ffm } _
on %.' .
?kA {%~DJ.c-/23fpm}).). cano St<l i
./923 l'c "ll'S sr,;r- /%i lo fm ioov skl
/./: : & nec,.j;S iK *// 5 3 r.r.i. J[. car s-ij i.an 3 20 H~ i
; 23oli3p)]fia. s.
MQMf[l inci u m in c .s . b0% */rq .pg/ T*'./ppr]bz .d s g.
~
trae {f,,. .g
## -jua- +7 3/ -
l' " IA S i .ai' . 5
. Ih3 M Dis b)
.%I
.. b!
i'p5 &{ n.
- ..4 73h 1 . ::~ \- ._-j - /,!
0\.
. .r ...., 9, ;
W ,_. . \ -- ._..j J tsov Ed
- -- . . _, . i b
a,mm.in u.,,.m m - n.w +v.,m.'O e
.,. !,H. n!!J -d ';
- c. . 7- -
z .. if hj ib M 4,V. P n""ppf! i l - ,
. +,. ; 9 da l
l
- i. .
e '
.'/ ,
! 'I f l 1
l ,l y i
!h .
h lm ,t j 7 !! ( jhf
. a. k.
p," ... oi f" :.;p
) *-
, ') l l i . -
i . . n. ," l. l p:%pdi$lJj l c' N . %.; D a r I oJ 1'P" l a If l pl Hil ..dj lpl il f: u r yr pl q4 ll-l ,irrittJ. Fir 1
*l ll llH x
.T ;
, a w
- I, I
,0 I I, . m .m. :
l l -[I . i l i g lW@ <.3 8 .l
!j ip%q .. I
' g{g i ll , J i !! Fn Wh lil ! .
g m.qgg gll P. wpi .
. -r
- p hhI. j k IV.4y iii i. ,a, ..+
' T .
s l, #, 11l e k.H c ! 4 . .. e m .
- i
. ch' ,
n t
#d g ib h d A
^
O * -l l l 3 I t j f, . . l l h' ,lI!dl liil (( !' ' 'Nk
. E$.c l h,} 4 , ! f !lNI dl l !
s' le s = a.mli m, /[iiml p. 4 . n
.- j.{ !in p , .
- u. i m. "; ,. i
,"..<F- . .
d i q .l
.I
~
.o[ i
,dq
*E .!;.
,l
[ i o!9
. . . , , i[i
!I l i :
. ... .' y . ! .
j d p r .i .! I - ea . . Z4 ' 9 ! a I[ta in iig. C' b h l , 8 .
.x .0 i i' .t r f!?i.n.,n (in ._
. < . y.-
. . .- _s. 8 2 .
' _ C- .c.- hm o .
x m f ! h, I! w .l I-vh b n, l
*l i
f l a
' / % *-4 H C.ll1 E' * * .
! i .
jh .
. . i l J
%H h; . . . . % f * '! h I
pi V;q . j p 'I f ! l[ d }.u,, Upp'm
, i m a5 25im$ _n n J nh n !!{n in n flH Q M M{[' ~ :, ..c- l j,
i
,f "j~}[f~- %pmfi Ngp:ltr'iiiMiirT ] E #IN !
nm u sm
- . ,, . 6 Ji s -
- .w;)
y p,- m o ! h*!1r&g nnur nwur s .m. :n i w . . . __ 4 m- - i rt tur _ n nunem - un mr - nn #g
. e.p? 1..
ajN . . g
$a
! p Il llI!i!$ ia lH dijilil U o w/:i"nL.rm 11 . 3
# $. @giM ti.
.g w.
~ ' . e. i * . s y jy g p gp #gp qmll , j.,g m rimu.gj i
gn
.a w . m , unman m 9 4 We n-un e
, sm m.m[ %pg w . 4...~.u.& . .
t ' em t N. ,o.a. '
.,...r . ..
. .x I .
i
, ti. r, .
4y , , y,! c.
. i ,
ms.p.w n i..I
- a. . y , . mos%....
b ,lbl 1 .gllll[ .i h,I -
,,,. p HI L'n h l !!+ * 'I -
. .. .Wi 4 .. .
g
' p. 4 ; ~ lgj ii h, qi hl y.MU !b III '
.- e l9,j![ j [}nlh. ,,.. -
4 ,
%, m
,' g il " Ving g !jpjg ;rger oa ,: +%q,3#, ..
[*i tg 'rp ,t I q[>jp j a.,i ( j c m, .. gh- -
-{p m:!q!fqi!
p!yyIl mln
.' . 1- - -
77h7-
-t Lc # ty l g'%,;.p p l Mchg$ ^;: ; J,qq om sqi I ag +g
- - . i
!1 (h i.2 oCoe l iM im. , i i -
.u.
3!4 Fyh 1p1.F pag.qn 1ni :g io :n ah yi -l i
!!bi g!qd
$ i2
; ,I lhY Ul n.
Q ghi . l0 nnm,p unnho
'lIJJJ l sn
- l, I ill pid .
-~
dii: ,IT ll!!u J !ih ilHi!Id I l :.4 Bil Idi Mi h c l @
. j -- -
.. c..f[
-r r .a ,
j. j iij.p m7- a^ ~j g j mi gh i ,, F -- 3 ap1g; ji , H. , h! HU%l i: ["ic! W_ph 'i 1'm!! pm
'J-W ic . .. .. . i . ...
b l ff f,N<h l n h N' .b l q b-h [rJ m,u M m,Me [7 h Ihhh ;j [h a 1 (~'7 a,. I I i [i.. t ll
,r ++h
/%.: I:i! _l ill llg I! p n
g i i h
- p. , g o i
4! .i idn(i.~t.[ -l l _i . m..w A4. p,., 4.g. () e ih d Id'hM ! I! 4 I Ii: ! ".'UI IHi *H i-
'.". ,W 't
([3')/. v.- g! w p. . n# II qi lq c p; qn.j
, l, v . . , y l !, .
ir, l l i .. - x3
% .- 2 4 ;,, h ' ,, ,
b llh hjnl !
! l l I f l ll $ fnlhj y.h.m-
. r u. o .. 3.y s ,.
4..n e.
; % L
;. J.,,.. n i ll n l nd l l
..m
.h. .L;%q.,d' . / q j j '. ;.!; 4 g.q.4;. r. . ,[4""" p' m,m,~
ljj ! m un w
.$ .e .
i l l iy 1 f p'. i. ,Q " Ll <
.- .- Y,3 Wd.D$',M.6 , M [d,l]tj [{plb ]I y ', 3 f [ [ Ti: k i { ] . ,
,- ~ hk j
--- - .. _ ..- =
b-REACTOR C00LWT LEAKAGE TEGT - g DATE: 10/ 2/78 7:27:49 - SP 2301-3D1 - - -TIME: O
-NOTE 4-IF-OPERATOR- ACTION DECREASES RCS VOLtF4E o
v -- G , V DEstRED INTERVAL (1-8 HOURS) . ... . . . n EffTER THE INITI AL REACTOR COOLANT DMIN TAMP. LEVEL FR74 PA -- v 2.89
-ENTE 4t-THE -FINAL-REACTOR-COOLANT-DRAIN-TANK- LEVEL-FROM P 2.93 4 (2301-3D1)
O ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHANGES TO THE RCDT FROM DS
-0 n ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHANGES FROM DS 4 (2301-301)
V 0 --
-NTER-IDENTIFIED-LEAYAGE FROM 0S 3 (2301-301) (GRi)
,~ 0 '
'J ENTER PRlPARY TO SECONDARY OTSG TUBE LEAK (GR4) 0- 4
-i TC8 -TH3 TAVE PRZR-LVL MUTK LVL RCDT LVL TIME TCA THA (IM) (VOLT)- : -
(F) (F) (F) ( I'l) (F) (F) g -2. 890 - -
-7:28:21: -571.227 591.234 570.9?.2 591.492 -581.211 225.307 - - 71.611 72.141 2.930 O 8:28:21: 571.672 591.594 571.359 591.828 581.609 225.233 0
0.6367 GPM GROSS LEAK RATE (<30 GR4): -1 I
.l 0.1251 GRi m TOTAL IDENTIFIED RCS LEAK RATE (<10 GR4): . . . - . . . ..
v . .__ . . 0.5116 GP4 EAK RATE (<1 GR4): g NETUNIDENTl[lE ~~ ~-~ I
]
~
-~
~~ ~ ~
, ~0PERATORr .
'o:' n .- t<' d W l _ . _ ._. . . . .
}
3 - - ..
- l
- o -- - .. . . - -
- . - 4
. . . . . l
... ;o _._.
i OW l
-STOP- .
. _ _ ;j L___
.'- 2301-301
- - Revisien 0
, 08/19/77 )
e I
*n DATA SHEET 3
~d j RCS LEAK RATE '
j
. 0:a IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE. .
.c i
s
- 1. Source of Leakage (Describe in detail, attach drawing if necessary) )
- 1. (MRid 6 TRo K d /)r() - A L/ To Floo R O/?pid '
i
- 2. Method used to determine leak rate -
j (Describe briefly) j s; cP-a rcy , c/ lib rded too ~ e y / fA i
\
1
// 0 sr4 ts 30S(C 3 3. Identified Leak Rate: . OfIgpm ,,_ (For use in Step 7.c o T Data Sheet 1 or 2) '
l
/ s
/ .
Performed by_ . /t// O '"' , Date
" ~
- 4. Possible Safety implications d
. (Shif t* Supervisor Check One)
Yes (Initiate necessary action)
/ tio Explain M,~ ,. L~x>, a. .
e C 0 ts tv t C [o I .s w m . # I
\ d'
^.) RI % \ ~ . TI'-4.1
~)
I *
%Wk 92677
. Shift Supervisor -
Date ,.- X N-)) ,
.. 16.0 l- -
1 -
.. .... . .. . . . . . . - . . . -- ~
y,
.. ., -/
I 2301-301 Revi:, ion 0
,iN.# 08/19/77
+
6f,y ' DATA SHEET 3 RCS LEAK RATE 4 . ,,..
.1 IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE.
m r l
') 1. Source of i.eakage (Describe in detail, attach drawing if necessary) '
L EVl/d 'A' /31 (44I * I '~* R y - I V 5"<f y 43,guscr Valve a f sect f .7 d yc 7 <>~' W e'n-)
- 2. Method used to determine leak rate -
(Describe briefly) C Y/' ,"/M 3 70 fv A-rc fl Ar/0. /ComL C A fi /J ff ic"O fo Me fw d '7. f Ato
- 3. Identified Leak Rate:
,O'/fgpm (For use in Step 7.c of Data Sheet 1 or 2) -
I l Performed by O M' d 5 , Date 7 3d'
- 4. Possible Safety implications (Shif t Supervisor Check One)
Yes (Initiate necessary action)
/ 11 0 Explain M (k o l.,.c.> ks
- s. A IPedc,s - Lb IA Tc, 6,m .s <
wa/s t, ~ , /> e. L i --- Gh 1 nc.- f
-- Shift Supervisor Date i
~
~
.. 16.0 .
.m . ~. '
1 7 . 45_F *-- ji @ - . . . .. .. .. e
, g' I -
2301-301 Y Revision 0 h 08/19/77 n f
/ \ 'Ii DATA SHEET 3
( ~~' ! RCS LEAX RATE -'
, IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE. ..]
,i
~
- 1. Source of Leakaoe '
(Describe in detail, attach drawing if necessary) As c/ - V- / 2 f/}cb8C c &fIc'
- 2. licthod used to determine leak rate '
(Describe briefly) /W
.syv Pw/ icll, CAftbYele'[ C
, // 0 m & M 3 0 5,2'C
- 3. Identified Leak Rate:O; h .ctJT gpm (For use in Step 7.c of Data Sheet 1 or 2) ,
i > 9 Performed by O M /_60/d v Date 9- d 8'
- 4. Possible Safety implications (Shift Supervisor Check One)
Yes (Initiate necessary action)
~
/ flo Explain M im o, -
ese R. E , l, o R .3 , , V i i .
@ c e ove s sk /, . h f.__ ~~
\ <
t>J YL ,I s v h m CT-e)
$ - S . 76, ~ 7 [
.. _ . . Shift Supervisor Date I
lQ.-
- 16.0 m.u- . .
Mff* . CQ4W
--- ' T =. . .:- -- - . . . - . . .
r
. . - ~ . .
l . . . . . . . . , , , k 2301-301 Revisior
.I 08/19/L
,'"N , DATA SHEET 3 (w.'
I $f* RCS LEAK RATE ,
.:)
IDEf1TIFIED LEAKAGE, . . _
- 1. Source of Leakage '
(Describe in detail, attach drawing if necessary) P1 4' - V - / 3 7 C.
- 2. Method used to determine leak rate '
(Describe briefly) q Y[f,. c/ S r c P w .< r c l'i 04 l' 0/'g 7 mt /<v' 60 M .
- 3. Identified Leak Rate: -DO b gpni (For use in Step 7.c of Data Sheet 1 or 2) .
l l . Performed by ' ,)k [- M/6'W Date k d d' i V
- 4. Possibic Sr.fety Implications (Shif t Supervisor Check One)
Yes (Initiate necessary action) ;
/ fio Explain M ,$ m. % << ,
L*,R2[. '
\ /~
# l
-l ._ > R. 2 < ~ we t o u e .d f 'i~a f a m .-, - l
. i l \
W d2. . 6o L m. F - e I. .
. l
.~
4 h-2C 9 $ . i! Shift Supervisor Date -
-{ }. -- ,
hg _ 16.0 l
=-- --
W g
- g. .
1 __ lo'o _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ __m .ee c- > e . . .eo , o ooca o ,
.-. . . . . - - - - - - . . . . .- --~- .
I
~
~ -
f 2301-3D1 J Revision 0 l
- 08/19/77 1
l ' im 4 DATA SHEET 3 j /'it '
} f
\__/ g - RCS LEAK RATE IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE. nl]a
- 1. Source of Leakage (Describeindetail,attachdrawingifnecessary) '
J) fu C- o i~' S o r 70 s.1 of W nrAA'mP Surf , C A .ciarr
'2. Method used to determine leak rate '
(Describe briefly) 5 rol% )rc d , /o o ort! C A li b fc Y S Y " j W fthL /W d V. C A.Cc -
- 3. Identified Leak Rate: , ('70 [ gpm (For use in Step 7.c of Data Sheet 1 or 2) ,-
l l . Performed by h' l*'ll S'P Date ']
- N * $
i i
- 4. Possible Safety implications (5hiftSupervisorCheckOne)
I Yes (Initiate necessary action) {
/ fio Explain /H ,,E, L u VI o e e .
l (2ee.v.. d /m ro C-_ = - tD f2 l < a k ~ 77 + 1-l l
. . i~-
ys W 5 2c.7[ Shift Supervisor Date
.. 16.0
- w. . =
'C.N e e
( 'Ty :- i 7)O
. - ~ - . . _ _ . .._ . . . . .
. . . . . .. e
* .__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _-_.~_w
l 1 -e = m - -
-- ~ c e vs.r ;~1 .; 5-g.5. , .Q 2 $,*1 \ \ ..,
/r ? 78 // 7 .lff. ,f l l
na tc/s. i ne d:!r cc,Y,i. i ,, , gg,, ,, ,,,,,, N' h 'l* f f****2 _, 7 t!.!.*f Ci e.onap ,, s,,,, ,, a y , *
<s ~ s., << . . . c,v r. ., , ,,
- c. ,,, , y..,,,,,,,
iv, cva +.or (as c. c . , ,,,1
, g c , , , , , , , , ,,
m s. w r~s p a,, e e es,9 ,y , ,,,,, . g ,, ' Y
.2 .,,,
/Z *- $ .32 'I'ljj~ e.fr [ c.y .p ' .
a sfe' < < /t.*
- lr.! c. .. a as,1 r ,; . p . 0 D3s li'est.D 6 n Ar.s oy,carr.r bras, p13,, j c,n g,., l N W ,Y W 5.$
'/ . ?.srfc's.,p{/erll&'.55550Nk'/'eEh))5[t[il}}
Relene , , , , , e .1, ! a ht St. c.o i .r.<n. ~ r -n r. n>ma n ge, w a ya
.<. x s i ,e w /r !
1
. e, u, .n.,,p,w c,i ofbJw $
_ , . . . _ o fi Coa.r,14 I< l .7 3 0 o +. s~,. 7 ,: /.,,,re , y 7., h
._ , ... <svI "c~cas/cv Co /J/,,e/.,s .
. [
t ., 01C
- T!*F e'). D i s' p*A^r.) (C6 *t/
cr.w s..,'Ift) : ,,te . .n., .. , G,r%.d.HT...' g3 m i r s,e w r.i i n,y.,, yu2,. } - ,_. ,,. . , c_ _ ~ ,,,h/ - ,h. .
/u'e o-o a., -,.
. _ . ons c *o Sw~o wr im
- r; Ce, .tL , n, Ga.1, r ,
_ , . _ , , , , , LJt.T 4 esso Sb.f,d DC-P / // fr A s o 3 - in .a s b
'os1.s toru SOS s e e ti3 Gc p;v3 en nes .
[5bYSj ee3r 5 % co os -e us C.- As es- masb fc*. , ,
/0]ct Shivco D C P' 'd hr A 3 i ' M AT%
999- m. . i.s c .ss a se en te 3% / co+ 's & an ue~-
.--) fg* fl.*t o Sh qp,s k O O &~.-
ayy g- nr stLt./ eu-n i n - s F,,,.s c.,-p. i c p si;ea irccw leis Sta.p/M + ie Afw+M i
~
. 143 %~O%
a 4 rd!a b sf'a-WAIA l
\P,Rd) ,, ,% v i. Hw M 8U Y.J,8
^
Dts M, i
% % % , % J & ~ L &). %d%
g p*'
- 4 a
O~ lyif y;{f/0-i Mf a .tr.'<.J ~//D- A4 A'/,9 >1'off J fRuda D G j, , in) a n /6 pet. 6e'> 3,Al,a,J u.J - AJAu , is c, u .s oc + -x tLi
/s
'gns s.
g; rg m~ . ~ e! q ig:y 'l d Lfgf ' g.p
-]j ai.g }; }; ]
. 4}if.q.q..
9ly 4.g 3 :m. u ~ UC's ,c;t.h s. Jg p , l .au :
- i. 'h:.,p;., , . 4w .i -
* l .j %p IIhilihhp . .w,f?
uIIll- p.hI d ol
~+
o ,gl-?i;i ll di!lha Ili[i[i ai I m : . . . . s: e 4., c.3 . . ...g
,'* '", l F l' ~I 'lhHj $phli]QI '
l , Mp l 1 j; J g ~}gl I] 'I
,,; i I% d * } I';
D I' l hlpii Q jijiblT[g p ,, .
?
,, ,;.;l1.{
L' l q' 0'
.ph iVi jh R 0hjlf T % s lkjGij'M-y.$ -
IIN@ I ! If it ,b ,Ihmhhl$ ! j. hI x lI l h~ s . r \s l l l l ~ ' Y !I h 6 il !' H 9 q '.P "5
?8
'[i [ll. ~C0H lIlf]h a
g : : lP j ii [hi .% I! h j ni?i 5 dh . & ^l "y J
- ..j L l .lI lb. ! le N i L..,'. lH!
ir f ! I t :
'::' ..J M'n l h, $ y# pd,(lz #] N.[
i
@?
(Q V >. i I ihfl! y d r, h. .flhph i!i di :lpt a ,
. .u . ,dp,.i, .Kj;!h . .<
.p -.
hl, A.-. ., l , Il 0l dl il OlflIl Q'Uh, -d'~ Il!.'l: ij g l . : c . . '. U [Id,
' " lP li -
M .{rJ [l.}l l 1 h(',h, n '
.r',
'y'"))g'g rt$ 1 h'l((l: ..'.'
\, ogQ W 1 i ~
muw
. / ;, . i .. h.ti .!d
('dh . hj.: r i, g- wo I l; '
,u?.. 3, .%. . .
. j" ['.,l.7
^
, I . -
I ! )< jl . p. p p xm g_ ,- i ..-
.'1Dlb. I 4
. ,l Hi. , o I.q V, { r . hj q.r. ,,.j ~ - ..i 9, . i,
<H a -- u , e l J^ ct i l r
.?
w .c w .m ,'.py'
* ."e
,n. A i :: .
? e g *y W/ ;
P d hf i F pfV GiM ,-- W. n : x< m m l i h"b;y j it igi i 10.,1.i IL l j nipt! 11$8QiH[ wi 1fl .Hj m yq 'y it
*@r~
K ,,s in g p'pq Ilw ia ;;j
. t
-r-i s gya. ;. , . a3pl1 i., J q,]br.., .
i
. f.s..
, , y . . .n..i m<
- 5 o.5
,o. .! . ,i !r i ..
o s: o;.p".l.t.'il .
'.LII ..;h.:.0;., .
l . i
.. 3 !:i; ".
CO
- 5 .c fu ru o I L a! Mhi'! N' qd. , f,i' 't _Wii"'1h '
, ;:n d.[.i, i .
+
g y y [ , ;i
o l. %. It gl % ..,h },; ; j ,; g l iN m u .-h e:r g l [ ,
. , gf ; ,'
a, - r iy pi ni;) ;,ig' ing . 3,. 05 .. y g.; l d' g. ik,i gl'hvO..,
.i $q,,m, p11F; li ,ihe inp ..:,. H q . .. ,qd ..;
m o z u. e m 0 4 ai , ti. d i i+ . qg m a l'ya m O " '"* *
- H U Ih, hh; h [.n.3 ih. jf L,',l
,:"l .H; '(q.. O'l y
(( [i1 h. Eo I, 5 I!, m' l lij. m + j ! l.: i g.g.) y , 1 i e , , s
" W,M
] E li p!"d: %.p!! t
$1 i, p gi - !
- f. . . r,, g l [. h l!!W@di[! <
j1" [ : o ,n r hh f l g:
@n hi HO uqlh ,
- e. W
. ~
p # y i i e i , . q c. ( 3f.f, r, .y.0,, h Qhy h fg.h w h.
$ hd d n . $,.
a wr w M,%y 1
. 7
( 7
~
a . J '. ! p ' l: w!r i i.
, i s ', sch wm gy by
.N .
l d f
,"h -!
'k fh a [.o .
s gl n..*y4 w' v, ion%jl I i a h .o. ll, Owii il i!l nih.e'! . _ c y) . m
gp..%p. y,;. w:
W
. . , , ... s ,. v , o c m ee[1mpi a p"p. '. vg
. . . r .- 1 1 lm 0 [t T; in f gi ig /.. m .4QL. ;
j g p .n gn [i 1J ,. ,
..v. q 4,i. .. 1.g >.
pg4 r 7 . i % ,n ; m4,
.. i m i . .. ,.o S
~' '*
[* k. . .h .;~ 'l I l ! I h I lIO
)l y
.... l -.l h f h h .-
>pp . . m ,. > q. _ r, q
- 4 ngl I g 'gl11 g q j q q'f g ,
4 T J Mpif LQ ' tid. ; a ll l ii I i i Tl il00
.W i
X J..i1.. Q.rLu.' W,,QJ.uMM
.f.. K :.,. .
- t. o w
- p. : ,il u@4#'i$ b.
.c. 3 h, h,w'.o Ya f
$ iy! j, i
IU; p g, 7 a @ q, 3r. .;;l q!
- m. ..m.,
. . d
.v. mg. ,
chH
, 1 ,
,..q -[3 -.i . nj g ep hs 3
, . . , t- i i p- 1p pi 7 7 4tq, j . g.
m)
.hp~ .l. !h m .nj g o'i
$}kl,l3L
.m- .i.- ?. *l l l ij l p r .p~
a '"d i[ }U N hill- hp Mi i is l, (({lili 1i ($ bi'l$ - 1.
%.+
+
~ m. .
m hypyij opnwe p. +Up% pc si qj g ji y
,hi pq pi 0 ty na.. ,pi; r--5 1pm nn n w .QR a $w R$.4p[ g l . -, ,s .
." t
. W- .b.
g t , lip hl p .citg'e!33'lll y m! ll' ]y,h b}~h n' p g h
'D.
. I -
- . l ; h l ,i -
- x. ...
n'..
.. y i . .: j1 1;i d o{ $M ... k k 3 ld W F a
G,g:: "@' itq% iai!Qc,lM.aqi i il
;v @ o ! a af
.i ye. p3 e q c,4 +e4 p@ :
m .g 7 .i ! - 4n , fsd . ^ i ( i - h=lI Yim o kllhy l .lli5{&IbiiI j
.h, p,m. 4ip H; qiyliMF. s a!iiM.. c_hq .i!)[j s
A,m9 ,ff . i. y U *hlh,.
# m.
; W. ,.4 ,. ,
, ';); *-l$.} ' 's aa.
. - , . . L .
4L W W. x ~w r_W~@m.d,,Amg 3 mMw, .~ .:a( e v
. ' n W a m, -
ve-
s y .. _ .
- =
.h
-g_ . -
.. .._ 7
/+~
g7 0 I t ._ . _ _ _ . . . . _ O 5 DATE: 10/ 2/78 REACTOR COOLANT LEAKAGE 'TEST O TIME: 23: 4:28 SP 2301-3D1 O ' NOTE: IF OPERATOR ACTIO!! DECREASES RCS VOLUME THE DATA ENTRY FOR THAT ACTION HUST BE NEGATI O _.__ ~
~
# DESIRED INTERVAL (1-8 HOURS)
FNTER THE IRLTIAL_ REACTOR _ COOLANT DRAIN TANK _LEVELJROM. PATCH.PA'lEL DVMf 64 2.422 O ENTER THE FINAL REACT 0'1 COOLA!!T DRAIN TANK LEVEL FROM PATCH PAtlEL DVMf 64 -*
.1J7 -
ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHANGES TO THE RCDT FR0'4 DS 4 (2301-3D1) C, 0 * * ' _ ENTER _0EERATOR_ CAUSED _ CHANGES _FROM DS 4 (2301-3D1) S ENTER IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE FRO *4 DS 3 (2301-3D1) (GPit)
.17 _ . . . .__ . _ _ - _ . _ . _ _ q f.
ENTER PRIMARY TO SECONDARY OTSG TUBE LEAK (GRi) OO ! _ _.-
'. O TIME TCA THA TCB THB TAVE PRZR LVL tUTK LVL RCDT LV
( F.) (E.) (F). ( F ) __. (F) _ _ __( I N ) _ - (IN) - __(VOLT) ? 76.924 2.422 I O 23: 5:26: 571.977 591.711 571.938 592.047 581.914 226.777 =- {. 571.734 591.531 571.789 591.891 581.734 227.244 74.982 2.470 0: 5:26: 0 . . l
.._. p . ]
I i O
._ GROSS _ LEAK. RATE (<30 GRi):
0.7748 GPM _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . L. _.. t O
. ,, .. TOTAL _1 DENT.I F.1 ED_RCS LEAK _ RATE. (<10 GR4): ___
. 0. 3195 GP'i _ ___ ____. .
iO . W E.-- ] g .~=I NFT UNIDENTJ FIEDTELEAK (<1 GR4): . _.. ._ _. . . __ . 0. 4 5 5 3 GR4 k bOR: a _.
@.N
~ ~~ ~' '~~ ~ ~
t % ,. PROVED:M ___ C..dNM __. yyp--_. = ;---- .-
; .g - ~~ . .
a
, .- r , - -- n = ; ..
.,zt. .
_"~~ ~~~' "E ~ ~~~* ~ ~"'2 5< ~~v- rnnw,=. e, --
$4%
C
- L 3-H)to a 5 ..... ,m x/:
4ffEdo:: - 0.4 .YYoi
- b l ; }900 NU Yd
- 49O u I \
~ => e r
. .) c.,4 g,A 1 i 4
~ /6 Ec20amuu).$.cf)b' 09 W-I:stra , ni, ' .
{f7 1Uhllt)disf5A53);N N.ICECliT,El4*.F! hes N A .. Isso W N M i A & - . ):P
/*e-1%vY W %iLL S M.;;n0;~ u ?Cj m:q W' irk 4 3 % 91 4 3A2AG9siAM .
,n ra Aa Mel 3e rous c.in., v,of.o. 2 E.be.J/,w, -- 2 sec d
;I W'Of.,4e?Aik'niJK%itsMh%i7s$.2 - ss h, &b
~
,:0,,3,m.4 ab_cd- _r tw-M_d. m.-.__at.,3f"La*N"IU.W:-)1 :
- d..
JDo*1 Q C.A-v3 . ton" l. i
$N< Q fw M !!A N FWu<~k"- M 99'o & Mb-N s a ha.n & b ll o9 N j
.. 9rw ch.J cs v2 9;
.. w e'. '}
; Y'2:Wi e .. e at.
-Q :-}
.. (*,s- db
;,. _ _ _ can g/.
Q i.
.. 6 251 ff9t
- l. . .
fl.03*f fir. i i ~ om h W
.p. e,;2 i
Ccw f)l l , I 1
, . (ch . A;!
4 i bhD , ,*?
,! ebs' j
}.
i . 4&s )
/il
. o F>20 om 0'ios o!
,j . fk mg a!
... . 09So (U; t' -J i . ... ./W4l e
_._ f.i
* ,, +
l .
. Itas G 4: I .c Ag ; p3 s- 3.:
s * *j >
\ \.1(r '
(
, f~
. .. i 4 w-s,,
..y /0 00 , A -} .
4
l \
.7. a.= l0 _.. __, ,, .
f
,( '
zq.h ' i/- 7 /c/V?Y hf d$ -
-u.c fe/<. .n! O th..?fa..s'g,.,,., :
Y' Y km di L ' f
.,g .
L.: . . p ? V ,,, ,, (y,,i.s-l,px .. C:, As t. r . f,'/? s/ !s f e./> , ('y' - Y.<P a z '*
) .cy I 'b2$v-l m f irf. tr-f ((., , , p,_ g,, ,
Iu b)
.s., s. $ 4 ^ T~ ~ .s' y z ~ ,<$ c; y /giry \
; w . Wall, rs 1. A. $Mr - /c' 'l ' H iy :'s ' c. e>
l ,
- i. 2305 r.si n's.1 7 - m'<pt fp., <t ve n f r,, n ., c l 2 5ic. ,('e .~,;'lc-l <[ 2seo - 1Or s .:. T'~ ;
. gy$ 1.210 C A .t s < c$ h s - v'c c as' /w Js.l. h fg., p / e,, f,_
I a ~ .d . Cnn L. w -b 0005 ,e c., >
- t. O oL , ,,,
,S', ,_,.f . ;j g tj.,,( ;
2 / < s a l'"- 1 e.
- I .l
- a. .
4 ltrz,8,.y,( s. 1 fm Jy ** -
/ 2.s I ff%. (. f
!'Ys' C's' .. e e d C % M e sac ls ssov l f *J** Y /*ot. fe$ =% $ - /V- / s% ,,
C:ss- .f. a . .2/. /' st1 t l .. . . . . . e Lis. /)lEX- 2.1 s 'id 1 'W, h <.< <ce<l .'. ) c 1 -sa,'t l .. .. CLS* flccv.I f.D ?4 y eat h .'
- s M')'
. . . . . . [C03 V's .C.~-- //'p. .
. j wf 2 G,. u t. .f. o , p.s. , W Cp ~ J c. e,,,.>
. .> no '
W ^<ypp-
*x c.p.ael f c s*
. vc N1 ..
D' W $n /s e .a,,- /f/'/E'l1%~ Yc Y%.4 {
.L. .
ah- fee,g.el / .4&.<-- <. //I'iC-n
- i4
~
~
wee a f r.a d:da e @ N l
~
$$s ll,$ Y ad d yDK 0 - ' ozw (LM, a i;os.
osu Q % g go-h W)ha:i? / rste 1~ h5! g o. L
~
A15 . % J o m J is >~w.~ mg %4 % b,Q Tc wt, 09ses ge * -G ico 50 enbu 1D4 6 C Ik2Qwh%, cW __ toisLi%i DffArcdel 5 $,- h' &2 1 p _ ,/fo/ t .4aYDAh$ 10 s q n3s m A ,ao fad n ' R
, /AC0 ekla .4 m i%h
},n ,tf, p.g&, ,w /e,f iYf /
- fl'l W N, , j '~
- 0 0- .
w-c __ _ -- - .- - -- 2m- - z~r"~ *'"~;**i~;.*~~~~ ' ~n-~ ms'" ~~- -- , w._. b.. .) . e YDb A.n Ym O as c Ff ._ ite z.-
- //' fe lMt $9. LOMA.A(es JM .
l i %', 9? dd.-.be %2- ._ tvs s.y i 133,\ 9' ( \.3 9v.~w2 sr,_.J4 ._. ,9/e; c. , cL.J B L ~S<>3 4.qR-PIA w., R 9 s. o.3 u. 7 l. qsn RPs c.t J D h.fw . m 1950 od. I )So g O S dmA C To .. iqG h/ '
.. I al4 M$
11)(, S9 S Cb(,bd ShM (,5c. 0' Nwk - l'!M l'// l D 5 K 9 5 l b 9,. f\ T o H Mh k . /9% A/T(
'F1f #//
- l. _
\ 3,*> Q95 L kb 'O . 'k'*1 Uf. 9 w e x<.+
' vs y s c%~h % w .
, '/'I/
rI3.55 Ne-oA Oav'.cvh 1 M b#) o , ,
"tc.o opy bij-t-t SS g4 ._ ua uf Ino & or - w en :
'4e b 4 \\Ngs.v- s sS u h 1G g L s_.w k
. w, ,.
N . 14M O %d Ch-V- 575
&&r,
, \m, Q C s- \' $ , t'? . . :s,o op,.
- -ll.3 tt,w--
.. J isN f $.h'$f,.eAiuvr! '.4h'/,f,en.i2,y,.c.,S?), n
. 4/'y j
'\ /vp S/7.:s6 97$ e/fL'), Cop ?.*r-/< 2.2. $8 e t/ */3 'A hi c. TIS .Cu A Fa % % u/:bi.ni;. v.en.~ c3.pg c.e, h .f .d,9>r . wsc/c; (S b? c',?-p /: t a.% s..~u: . 145 /. f' (c.-l'-/C, g y,p+v- i ,4s -6 / .f.h:i y~ .A,.,;.#,;/fG 1,9 %< ,
.f S.)/-<.4pf..f)k d.e. /+c . .
. wp Cb !
~ c o -/-t c.,
l ,
*'*I
"' \ . /bN fl'$ (ldrrr l ',0 A C ter,l]?.:.^. >.5 ko' Trc in A f }.;f. ,.: , ,
$ .t
( ,, j(d'</s): i<,' O -l-C$. O,'ic); lk3pA..y-.g.:,.yp>/if.(,$ gjf g,'j E j o., .: .; i n .~e.e ... ..
;wg,) 1 L,::. /W C.w&.f y~.~ W E -.&.,p.4 4,i l., r ,n ..: y-4 a .," w s. '
sp f . ?. /.t' y W, .n.4.v/j.'.
- h y >]; ~. jr;-7.s,..f),' <q.2 .
p.cf 7,;
., s. "/'r- $ r, / 3. s.. . Wa** t'. /f' '.. ; '*
~...r. .
..,. br,,
7 / : *t.v!*g i.e. Al yy .,,Ar.3.;.fi.j, y.,gd,!.h.-: .A
~
,l ,l tr. ;); . j.,,ll t/.)3$9.'~(d?.?PCTr$}/;trineteffypx.:,
a
, , , . 99 g,, ; - ; !?'Sr,.ci anj /.ps: s. '.U ' d ,r.>l f:.'l _ .. t g pg y i
i7?J /Yv.,v'h!/ 2.*' ' <. 6;' r?h ,
,', t7'// ,'-M.J '.'?y,).j if9yrif.n.5./.j' , ;. s- j- , f,. , , ?, . -/*
, ~ , l l
I ..I 1: >.: pp d,,s) E '; ./ .Q .,,, )/,,,,_.,. ;
.{b iY't' fff d. .,v<j ' 6'/ h .h n s.1J,.; '. ' "~~ _l '
9 2.m fry '( f,,*_s -f.f
. ( \ }?' . ~ h'r V2 :%, /!t'${.v/.2..)} J &, ./* f
' ~l )
ex ,US 'J f e,/-f., y.<e:: < ......, c
---.---.._.,_.J 1
i J
. 7:? .
p n g.v. & & 1 l 17 1,
,G. , i s ,. ~*'
ltM ?.< b.-W Y<* [ fr; &$3 , As fc c:n.Lpf,' j),yppy ,,,,r, ,,g,,,. < p a a .te & 6~t E gx:s , IVS i & M:i*L ' h s/Vriyisei / t A:. a..-icii. -civ2%.dt'; z-P!A nIo 0 ui!.h n- .% -l .yr ,..p>- crs uy a.), .ci t ar: 3.ai(p,,9 ! Q, 1:: tit:p %). A.'i.. .i.6 .,4 c., w, .7 e,,.Q im 0? I t,7.m cc AM ch,i.al h " . jqrl /v.m. fiv.n . ,-f, R t w , >>ts.;>s 4 4g ! d . 1% i u ; d.'. u I b' n.u j i.,n s . V1( !:if->;L .],<l be.m:h _ s n uits.a6. tel 6i&pd, det x<n% . r* /tH1,e.em.-.: '. ppfy.,y rsarp,:< p : t,u L,e y , h',Ijji" O.,' l.'i'fa f S..< lW /, Jyfjv?* j't. . Ceh u a RFs.:16 /d 6nd,
. w;n SH '/-133A >r<//555 ci .-s'l~r s.ir. sis te 4 N . 97..f ElH'-5B
,,,.,L w&uj tit .'-tch, 72}~ %'. ,Ly sis f.,s.2.a.
s><t' O 3 75 3.e. 2.2 O. .
- a,w sp->'1' <W-s-i78 6M .4-<- cw,N e2, '
{ til.3 tor r:r 2(~ pren.o/v Ek vr.!* n.)7u c<.' d',Ce/!. .V,b.*65//.tvf j S?.2, 6/7.:~/ dan GFkF.briu r, t/A s/3 pIS /Jiirsxernp2 J ' 'hiO.
.adih~C//paf 'I3S (lc 5e./ C.1'-i'-I'IE. .Itn MP'Ili'/<!"
b y !! ' S YE'"e
- y A,,, uis t 4.< . Jy .c ','a- 'e. 7&lk, s-6 pd 1m 16,9 8 ,:< a :~iM-ra 2p3-k:29A/4 paa 6'/4'sY wp csue ne .2 g& sop.2. 7e-rs ,.c:.+ y xc 4 '
r,E<>t# : .. .
*"Y7'f'.6C~P~l -
l
,e pi<-A>c-6
, . ... nis 4ll rw/< k .d4'e>lyih f% r/MM, "'""- i ny) (m, c . tys.v 4 ;t' .9 2 i'5. brw'1' Ad ~/*', '
W.ffnf# p.,t .
'.u17Gymih,.. e" p'/4"bf A ntib'y N .A .or-se,at7 e; ut r:py .c s h-10 x , 4% W~~DN #T6 ""=
J,
,,.e.,' ,,,, b.,.ms).dhv;O, >% I?
- l'Iti3 3 A *.A'N'$ ' ' !
- 1. a l
- a. m w , i:,w. sy x.6. i.and% 4'w-"'
2:n D~, n' d(sn 5 /) -5 LG WOAPGdc,viDml}I'ffn* _
.f&. /dD - .
f 6/&r-/, (
)
w 9 N
d d f,.
],c y , D- II 2
'. ,s
, , f j, ,
d.; m
. e,i 4 .
I- - [i. h ,l,a . l I i
; I,,l...i.l p, u
i ah s.4i
. ylg .i gMlf i u. . i2JH
~
/.,.....,
j J g'y, 71 ;l D'!;M e j;l ,il '. <. M' J l[Ulill Qi td
. 1 i
l i Uh in t .
'l ll
.: e ~ j !- il hid!! $h!:, f il !!Yii IM j!E ? I _ '
, .2 MI
'~ ' ' '
I L.l
'h .T'l !: N
]h.f llll' h h hvId'! I/ *
'l. lhl : pH l'fp'IFi 4
]v. l hjf] lp dh.: jf h
![!:' . Oi@
5 n .p Mc!iii Nligj!h1%is gh i# l Wip @M
'"sm niii,l -4 l #lci lw- W.@$.,
I t(v' O i
~
l l l 1i i ! lll I,1, j iWN. .r; !j
.a
'! f idl'r !I' .-
p i 1. lh l l E.'- 9 E I Nlll'! d ,' ! h,, Md!Q'30 hI !fli [l 4h b, E . * .N fl yp 's b
- i
- g. rp ik :lab'iit r
..A
/
. ms yo
'* w M] -
4plI rw+M@hn - c b- .,g t l 1 i
, ,I
@L y, nwri I
Cgw" ng
; ll
.y m
8... u kq I lu yI m e o W': ie l ii y
>@g!ii k' ,
linh
.' .=.
/
ea ze - p I .t Iy,i rI i i h i 7 ri l;: i d h,rii, l Jp i ij s
.v h ) if !! h li O il lh dl ldi bi !)d Il H[ [r [ ,
J. ')
'A' f i -
l I l fl t h ll l'il Ilb I8'- l f, . hl .g ) 5
'I- L. C
., , ., .. ~. pl' ,' qI l
- e'
./
OO hh ill j]el'l' lL S * [f, liilll !' !H' g*!
. l cro ,
l g e c .. Y,-
',ll ll 1 , i ii ,q ,1 o ~ + ;
CO hhb I ' 'i i J l I I 'IH / ' 'I[ h. <
'!k t lc f'-
s
@g % .k'.
t. emr &e eva .. . a i d ,i i,iiWdi p.H.!!r q uv pi. pn y ih. j,ik i i
.Os ,
H kb ** j. j i . c.-
' ' h. : x,. C3 -
e l , d !
~
4i%. ne I4 lU m ig d i J...ee n.mz p oi - i 1 [,i o a i
-e m m F- u JF .
]im dI'Wi IInl !yh l
[;.l lt', , l a i j.d. ' * ,.o e f- f.s ..n!]i @ H % lh. - 3 i . .. A r g , .. 9b J .'$ ; "; 0.,' l uh ;} i D ., H. i
, g ,,h, q;'% y nW; . . . ; . g.b :q r.Tg
, h. l _
.. as..i.a$!.S.kr.,
Ud ! p" .i u o 4'l El l l Lu b' l. -i ' .e- .4 i gle.l
?
N. t' M'l d i l' lo j! I hh l ' rt. l'l '4
$ b, C ?l i '
fi !
@l'lpl[ _
50 O - l I '1 *L ,M.
l i .
[
.,a' ,. J ! I fa U
],N llli IOI l dl'y; l ( ! tfy ! ;l
. r.' . =#JE' 'M .
i "l' i 4 y,c o la . l
! a o , 1 HI mlT .
.: i [ai ms. - -,
. .. . a -
P,ud
. e#, t. j Udll g 10l ll cN
( l,l' d!! 3d l[hD l Will!il l
. l l i g ge-v { c lq[jlppigi gl ti pln g!! qi,fy -
.+ 3%
u-
$$ 'I 'i f Di Uf g$g M ! III il 4'
[ff f i, I
.k .
f a d , .!.! Mi f 1,
!' , M ,b [f l
', : M'c 8 I '.
M, , lR M.9.QR@r @ ul g [tj[~ lll p, jgppp: o l ,
, 7o <
p.i.i so 9 4:. gg. s yj gg* n.g
. u ,.
rg g-llgj , w jo y [ -
;..N@h +
e' ' .' ' s @ l !i b == +
'5 d':NLj.j86t/m .
a l $g!j, idl' h h' b' ! ' id.${ D]illL ,
.);Ry'g
~
e' .g-
.i-
[ [,' i lj
.A*. / ll, * ' * -. 4*f, * *. . * "
d I I hl 4 Oli l .d'll N,t 'pi. b ie' l. ji Ij l e i N.*M^~
. y, ,,,,,, ! l syt ,'. *
- p Wg}'
i . f
; ; l 3 l .
J.J.[4 qM n,MI: ([c?
/
i t<y'nl jih lpl i: , , :
-?,. i l i
i g. l h l L-
~
h:; ' .f l' hI 'i h f -l h ,, b/i h eh l :q: d J ' ,3 'L
;A 'f k , ,1l
, A .W . " ;1 . L1, ,M4 j.d.l iOf@i'l .d' 9 [ hl ll
!"i $.'f 1
i'@ d h' q 0 a ! ,! I
'N
,g s h ,.V J. o, c.; '
, . I ,z ;j 14 j !' f &;w f !e 8
l j ?*We + ' j; E -+ r ot,i'l I !g, tg . i.gd3.@..ej! i 4 di +- - get { i
'l ;
l y qj p!oinmq[IlI gl q id ir 1 a h - e M lll D @ 5 l 4 gd I L i Wi
.u..,
q N, l ! h' hu "hll C,b I. !!il
'* l !I i' o i h ll h ..
* *'"J'*#
? -- .
04 CL . . _ .
..% 'e'
, *2 s3 ir3! t 8h
- 41
.' QL1p> pi lp NI **
4
-a i
,m m,.. ,,
%'*' lj ii [Iy I. 7'J'^,."%
. . . J q 1-l
- c. . .s < a y -
i l 1
! h, = { ti i
- i j , F s*w lgJi(yi:
l g{ a(& y.ti,;.p.g., hWbW MQ
*7' l'll f*l f 4 d. '
.c. .
7 i q l-l l ,F I f l i q mm]' f,lf i '. i j!
' ' i:
>',~
iiN t q .%p> (~ ,) N1D $. 'i 4 l ai lhj lhl; ; _ H n1 [i f . 4 h! i;i! 4 ;d -
. . /. 4 Y uwo sR
~
..e+
.. sm pyi mymm un i+w jun .
r m,w;n. m oj - 3 . .. .w <
.g,gys,Q l g g tec. ,.tj e w... g. c ; ..A , 7. k {Ll H ji. "h p t 1 i.: a 4 my-wg. +. w y
-t
' 9p.pem..p- p.ep [' :
h, y- ! h,< pp gj.. MM. ;. g ggi,.: Q o oe im i ..h . m . .o - 26 . ? * - * * ' ' ' *8 i , , i g j;., E U'*i'],p[~~j , ; I;, u) s ~( i p i,[ u ,,q' ,
A>' #^ T b'! iN L{
- U ' 1 '
..I!. .%...L E ' hh. t,:J ,g
' ..! I 'i: U l/fi.E.. ' ' . di1 -
" " 'W J
g s j \
,/ 3 - ._ . .
L' & 1 resi
.O .. _ . __ _.h l
DATE: 10/ 4/78 REACTOR C00LNAT.4.EAKAGE TEST ' t 0 Tir4E: 4:47:20 SP. 2301-301
- - )
-_ _q j
i O NOTE: IF OPERAT0a ACTl0ft DECREASES RCS VOLUf4E THE DATA Ei4TRY FOR THAT ACTl0:4 t4U 1 O l DESIRED INTERVAL (1-8 HOURS) O1o mTrn TH- INLTlAL_ REACTOR _ COOLANT DRAIN _ TANK.. LEVEL.FROM PATCH PANEL _DVMf 64 x 2.594 ! O B4TER THE FINAL REACTOR COOLANT DRAIN TANK LEVEL FR0'4 PATCH PAf!EL DVrif 64 . _ __ __ _ . _.J _1.67 . _ _ _ . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ l ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHANGES TO THE RCDT FROM DS 4 (2301-3D1) U, 0
- J FMIER_0PERATOR_ CAUSED _ CHANGES FROM DS 4_(2301-301).___ _ .-
0 )' { ENTER IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE FROM DS 3 (2301-3D1) (GRi) - M7 _. - _ _ . _ . . .._ - - - _ . _ . _J-ENTER PRIMARY TO SECO JDARY OTSG TUBE LEAK (GR4) _ __._. _.__. s O Til4E TCA THA TCB THB TAVE PRZR LVL MUTK LVL RCDT LVL (F) (F) (F.) _ ..(F ) (F ) . __ (lit) -_(IN) __.__(VOLT). O 572.430 591.281 571.109 591.422 581.555 227.602 65.753 2.594 5:12:37: 572.648 591.409 570.797 591.172 581.516 227.746 63.899 2.620 6:12:37: 0 _. _ O
. GROSS _ LEAK _ RATE _((30_GR4) :__ _. ;
_ 1.1708.GPM. O TOTAL IDE].ql_F_ LED __RCS_ LEAK R __ ATE (<10. GR4): _ _ __0.2504 GP"4 O h _ .- 0.9204 GR4 m
"(NET UN!DE!ElFIED LEAK RATE _(<1 GR4):,,
O OPERATOR: # -
, : APPROVED:[/
t %e .._ .. .
.w + ~:v .
. . . ~ .
.---- , .m : '% ma.:.~,-l - -,- - _ , _
. ~ 7.--,..- _2.m.. . . .
AiO ,
/c + >: p. ~? 7;f. f.7 . 3*I
!c ll ~'s . Ar(k"" Ih;) lA'
$ . I' ?3* e f./c </ lle sk.!t to.t !..a .> r.
O SOC
.i G ff;lf.ph, prir.'. ,
cr.<w or ea L <
- O ft c1* < .'. 9 -.
. M or ~ e- a. , 9 ,W, P e.~ c , .h a: s-at<. fM' b ~'. 20){
p,
',i . Y ro., fe eo f. t _ ,,. +,r, , W mr? /n' 1r iW o l'e0: Ar ..
{f/ of ./ s.nh , {l'.,' /er f , (.'4 9 4 fJf,c/f l' ,Ys , . k l0 N
,,. . ' TECH sl'Ec ;Ms ; a,. s r . ry. s ' . p ner jj'.. M'. , .
.f41 &
p,u r . i. ' - ya is jy.. acw ., 2 / Ul, G. an.,r s s-ii - i u , ,i.. a.,. , cm wo w ..'
- Do .' Cc o., o, c.n o al.../ Jllj f }??
.! m. s. . . .
- l)l
- 3*>~ it!o y ed C/ f 48 10 s 7.ru s t,'< f.-f jvP ?*l "' . . . o'0 0 h/u
;l vsf /Jotes se,cle ce J e=r ce,,i ino yf- isola 6 eac ..
', 03c, smera n pyou .p;( DM Q.
l wr SivFNe cv p/c-*- ! {/L b] t.'6a w.ost A.pu o.' '? A P3 h.? Mo1 M
. E
- osso srre ree es.P-n (.:.2 5 >< e ,,, n c ..., 20.% G ,,
l . l e5sf Go,.ifl-lc{ f C.. Duet 'nu s o .) res.s g. p.nr ..__
~
"Q:
l h L.(~. OED 5rr/PU M P-14 . So .Q & < MA O*''Y**!l 2 av)
- Mi cso ro i r>y is er. h# stiu ..
,S.), ,.
i,, ossL .,
., as crivo .cc' laded ZAe .df, E Atf@No@m*, WSp X
. , /R/ppsk .
t.an ca .'.sanm os u 9:.m~a% l t?SL eded.x1 c6.-auh S s::uwaf
; ;.5sz. Im .4s- ec.iev-2 t,9 w 2. ?r -1.b s <>r' ,
13SD Ge:.pGrl .ccP - z-7? -FG oo A , l y;r p 6/7e si:<.4,.n.J. duo'(#?1
.'s t a.fc.
- f -) (%
'. I'lff ,ddav-
/.fD C r-
.W/b-.c,,.*kc.d;.f?luI,
~
db .- '
$ishu,,.. '
l. ' 1 1Dl .
// /) -/) / A cdv ///) /*!C n d 4'f, '
tEf % eJir - w r.2,[ mk,.A ._ - ,wg+. Ir,6.
, . L . d fG .
/ 3,r t M'
., iv.C x. _p _7:1?
D 4.:t. . .r u._.
. r,, L .ywn f .:. ( !,,hd ,
H M ~ 6 : n . w . )j;.a : b.w: "./.m -? ;7
.<S.
iros. q.. .yX. ._ V lC.+ .r;x; /I4':~' L.f:17:/3. . x./w., T.d~ v.
.w.p. ;T
.c/ .
.s._. ..jg._ j' . ;, .;
.;". +,-
va . . . ....<.1,.
. s, a.
)
,(I ?. 7q,,7 ,;ik , g ,
8*QOj'Tl 0.l ., . .: s , ; * ' ,c, .
~__.
G _; l_ "E '%- .
. , llf dud'M ~J ql, m J; ;,,, f_f:, ...,_
n.. . ru ppm om m MWMM a 4.-7 . . y pnum u r in m o,n @un muiuno.an2J. M ~ Q 41 ys-p) A
. >. .; . :x.g,v.
J ! !! .' ' W ip y WG n.y pF ' . W R.
.,[. L i n $ik h h, I k .*
mu m,n.m
.m .
. mg[, 1 q
f.- .f h . hl ;jg gh I
, t.- l 4 glh g[g$g !@ g ;.g 7
y . f
- 1. # QQ 1 Q Q $m.@,l g. :@a. l.!n pM.
a ~ [m . lm r,
- r .
i - l, l o a h !. 1 e 7.: h H B, J ij . h.?p ,'y t j
. l E c j .l ,l.hl .it f 'h,i no9.h!l p l ! f 1N ~ T. . .@e
- s. o ,
m.# Y, Klj, 1 - oa h. a .: .
.)
q d I h3 WiM n . Jh.t,ip @ ,miq,ed,u @, [ gg f:e '8 b t H r- u .E
=. ou8 oa R UN i
- WF ts .. g .
liTHyn h~J ", ,. .o .u 3 .
- d p !
WH.k i
.y
. i i
U,jhniy '. d.. ?,; 4 f. .. ; !y,u LF fI Q
'4
;N U.: 3'III \c ll Ilr.. ,i .
I
- 3. ?> amn E . ".. i so i il l, ,!~!.
i
*j. -
- n. l ,1'. L h(
d l 0 'l I l I
' g' '
H ' *-* *
- 4A O -
l l.] h M, i l, ,'l ! L .i -
~5 i- @.
% i] yp d.1 t gjpg p ;p., (( p' y!
. a.o.m - :I: um e a c> Z '
j
. i 4 % ol j h" !J ,b i ;,7.;;
.c 01 u ao 17 d:
r li'1@7, l l iI- l 8 , qh.l 'a g!l 5 lil'I$.$. ,i 'M 4 H h- 4 !Ul id. c
.l in,,js g'l I(,lh J d W Hi n, ,
n:nm 4',i i L . e,,: . w
- hA w id. I ps.I a t. 1. . - - .
p r i
, i 'q I i I y
A* J i i 37 O I i qq < ' Ikj diHh f il hlE. 6 y
,p I d 4 e ana' O Is 3g% $qj.$
4 iil l % : $; 'd.i : > s.1i. nIV fm'h.d. Y f new4' IU m n M q' n mn
- n. - ' mm'lM
..S-:4 o e lO 7 phwy. & .W
,. ~ ~. n U
.- , ' g J
^
a iiitnii !H ,W, o .!!b.. L 4 .y!. W.h i pa -l . A- t n!!
. . . c u e n ,_
v .. .. 1
<s 1 han !h., ounem ,nnnup nngg gjgg
- NH an Inquh .;3 y. ppg,..
.3.:r.y .. . g. . , , .
q ...m. .wa. , ! y. w
;.w w- %.,g. ~.op., g,~pp g, g, gpg..
(: 5 l ..le ,. g ~g, v; .
, 1
. r, m .
7 3 .; . am .. l gp y( ,., u'n' u'i i. , Nhft"rj .., E H .ll a
, "h,. m.' . . . ?. u.( p., I
.Y ( $a.0, g f I. k .fq!! pI y l f b buh , 'bl h!! dil ,.h il MIC '
,ta I x < , 9.[~h...4 l ot - 1s on+[,'.'],.: ...t..'...,qi: .. ,
y., .. _, .s i miy y : e , cp .q a, - c. . t" 3
. . ,0. e3 1 c- , ,, i
$< h; lh 1h 'h h
^
)'
. t .. .
N
. c. e +cp:.IN'c 4 ff g~. ! ' t '.'g.
h.w.A. mf j' ri. pllr.T A n!~ ~yyl . ,N;ni a I
.r.. .Am ' -
mv 1h e,, 3
,l % ' I [" 1 cI.3" - '
, ~
' <'* i' 'Mr: m .
@ @ z.
e*-.- e ,,. ng ! l N Sr U , u - .
:p:* 'd 40 C .s ' 't )C
. . .:q p;'
.li [di'.; ,,', j p
- u. E a BH ,i
- nn (f nu r,n r."
.. n y : ' E q f 9 ,.
"$. ,c n,u ".,%- 1Jh d ..- s. a....F_2 e onm zHp O M .J a , y +u plfh : ']p[ ,!!p.-....f.a
-i.
A' su., - , ,
. ' n...
. l,4. q ; ,1,'n ol e
g, j yl"";q ,1 g, r,, !d,4l. gh y
'$ tot a
q $n
@d -
.- co
';"....,7+
,.t. E, j"*p'M m ,, 4 'j' - - -
. li ,
;- f. r., n..q. - i U" 4 j ., ,~..',,
< ? - ; ;- n,w,. .n.x . Ig,
.1 (, 9. . . t- r 4y' py' Q
.. Zz i. . .i y g I. ! gy"@dp - 'iiQ @ g,,,,. r 9 . 4 % ..
NWDM $ NNy#.. O in i ,.
- @w@e^
e_M . y
'I N w;h
'; S gh f hi, k l f O h 'f d h .hl !$ bhe .
uA win .pg1
.m. swm ,
l, s;nf -
- o. < e I j; 3 pld l. i a l g.i ,d nii hi ni
.da /^ b= a!OI li lh mh ~ gi $ hi Q[j J j_((J M g s ,' . .s.v.d. -
ot 3 e b I.o.ll mm y . W7 9 g i go, .! , yj
. (,3 tye 1 J
4 J!4 f
!. Vi{ld.Ngiqlmprgb 0 @ % e,Wi[ 4!
N di MN 7A U n,: @ylhGL, @@ k
%..n q 1:
My?" pr i , w j .a eg$o#Tm p,,gj'
. un . - t. I m[ [Il,Ilh g MU hy us g.
[I']i%nwsm nn sc.: mm . , n.t . . ..
.. y.r.yt..o..n_.p_,
. a m.. ,. m, .J;! m#
.y p. ycm .n; a:. ,.
. - - . . . . - . . _ ~ . . - .
f... .. . pATE: 10/ 4/78 REACTOR COOLNIT LEAKAGE TEST
^ TlME: SP 2301-3D1 20:33:30k)z[__.s NOTE: IF OPER_ATOR AC,TIO!!, DECREASES,RCS VOLUME,_T_HE_DAT_A_ 0 ENTRY _ F, T) _T_ HAT ACT,
! O '
O DESIRED ll4TERVAL (1-8 HOURS) 1 _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - . . . . . . . _ _ ._ ENTER THE INITI AL REACTOR COOLANT DRAIN TANK LEVEL FROM PATCH PANEL DVM#64 0 2.51 . ENTER THE FINAL REACTOR C00LN4T DRAIN TA'4K LEVEL FROM PATCH PNIEL DVl4#64 . . . . _ _ . . . _ _ . - 2.56 O ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHN4GES TO THE RCDT FROM DS 4 (2301-3D1) 0 _ _ _
- ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHN1GES FROM DS 4 (2301-3D1) 00 ENTER IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE FROM DS 3 (2301-3D1) (GRO 0
O B4TER PRIMARY TO SECONDARY OTSG TUBE LEAK (GR4) 0 _ . . . _ _. O THA TCB THS PRZR LVL f4JTK LVL RCDT LVL TIME TCA TAVE~ (F) (F) (F) ~ ~ (F ) "~ ' " (F ) ' (lu) ~~(IN) (VOLT) 20:34: 0: 572.258 591.648 572.148 591.086 581.781 226.637 71.299 2.510 0 21:34: 0: 572.000 591.641 571.734 591.125 531.625 227.336 63.037 2.560 G
'-~~
GR03S~[EAK" RATE ~(%30~GPf0': ~1.0602 Gm '~~~~~~~ ~ ~ O
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~TDTAT TDEf4TIFIED RCS~ LEAK' RATE ~(RIO GRO: ~ ~~~0.15G7 GP4 O - i
~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ' - ~ -
0.9125 GT24 g
~~f1ET D.7lDENTIFIED LEAK RATE (<1 GPM)i .
g _ . OPERATOR: [M ._ $ 4 7 g __ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ p- 6 O ' APPROVED: i ,,
,Wg;
.e
.g_.~.~'"
( e.
- s. ,
,Q z._.__. .a , ,
.,.J. STOP 0
- 1. 0 :.l. . .
l ~ . . _
..~
l ge. m._ .. .
. . .. .. .__ _ . . 4.
. . . . _ . . . _ _ . _ . . . ~
~- ,
^
f4 .
, 2301-301
, , -J . Revision 0 .
m 08/19/77 J f'"' *g.,
/: i c. -
DATA SHEET 3 v..+ wi .
&42 RCS LEAK RATE '
. . .s 4 N./'9 IDENT!FIED LEAKAGE.
. 3.]
q; . .
- 1. Source of Leakage (Describe in detail, attach drawing if necessary) '
L C+ Rid G T2 0 UC d /11 ll - A */ To Flo o R O/?ptd i 4
- 2. Method used to determine leak rate -
(Describe briefly) l' *' /f# s roPwA rcM i c/ lib /ded 'O' GY
// 0 m L is 3 0 Sq c -
i i 3. Identified Leak Rate:
. Of'I gpm (For use in Step 7.c of Data Sheet 1 or 2) -
tv . j i Performed by [. /d'/IO / Date I W
- 4. Possible Safety implications l (Shif t Supervisor Check One)
Yes (Initiato necessary action)
/ No Explain M,~ L% K3, m. , ,
12 e c o u s v 1%[e To Su n m. '
\ <
va Q[E o \ n . TI E '
- E:.;--- .:
NT" ~ M l~ Snift Supervisor 92477 Date l -
~~~
.. g,w ... 16.0 m:. . .
.j ch -
i 1 l if."- _ _ ._________A
, .. ,/'
2301-3D1
, Revision.0 .
08/19/77 N f[, DATA SHEET 3 (b4
\ '"
RCS LEAK RATE '
.J - ..1- 'c
# IDENTIFIED LEAXAGE, ' ~)
s.., W
/ 1. Source of Leakage (Describeindetail,attachdrawingifnecessary) l11 () - I t/ - s' 9 y Lc~r1N iM~ /31 LM NC He '~
(M.s if u nr velde af senf .z/ 7Fc w cit <w)
, 2. Method used to determine leak rate ~
(Describe briefly) 3 70 ?varc H /MD , / 0 0 M C Al' A U TCN Yf,,,fg f o /ru y 97..S~fO
- 3. Identified Leak Rate:
, @ / f gpm (For use in Step 7.c 07 Data Sheet 1 or 2) .
G : Performed by. E)- M' d 5 # Date 7 dd')
- 4. Possible Safety Implications (ShiftSupervisorCheckOne)
Yes (Initiate necessary action)- e i
/ No Explain A t k o ,- ks a R t sA )
6 i I? e t o ~ - - L% (L re G ,~.1
~
< l j
t vR/sb~,/?e1 . l _ l l t ww A-- k . lz ( * ) f Shift Supervisor Date Mw
, , _ - . ._ 16.0 l
.' :"_- - . l TtW=, ,
. . I m
m- :. . -
'{4 $ ,' -
I
4 -
~
., . 2301-3D1
* / Revision 0 08/19/77 L'i e N -
DATA SHEET 3 RCS LEAK RATE -' 3 IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE. .
- -]
- 1. Source of Leakage , (
(Describe in detail, attach drawing if necessary) bi cl V- l ~1 fACfwC t &;rf /c' l
- 2. Method used to determine leak rate -
(Describe briefly)
/
.s 7a Pwi rcil, CA {t b4lck C Yl"' W /
~ /t o m L Mt 3 0 S E.,C
- 3. Identified Leak Rate:O;# offgpm !
(For use in Step 7.c of Data Sheet 1 or 2) - s v
/ - l
\
i 1 Performcd by 0 Ml 60& Date 9-S S* W >
- 4. Pocsibic Safety implications .i (Shif t Supervisor Check One) j Yes (Initiate necessary action)
/ flo Explain M ra o, mcRd, l e_ , R 3 r a l y a i
&ceoutvskle. % f.. . - . . ',
tJ YL f .s u h m s CT<}
~
- Q&. %.zS.7 [
Shift Supervisor Date l l { -.
- h. - 16.0
-w -
1
. 1 4.'.Mm_ __ - . - - . . . - - .
a 1
, ,,,, 2301-3D1
, Revision 0 .;
' r' 08/19/77 i
'4
,' a DATA SHEET 3 l i
'f *
, RCS LEAK RATE ,
IDEllTIFIED LEAKAGE. s.d /[
~
- 1. Source of Leakage '
]
(Describe in detail, attach drawing if necessary) )
/14 Cl - V- / 3 7 C. *l l
l
- 2. liothod used to determine leak rate -
(Describe briefly) g Y[u (g
~
S ro f ~A rc !'i ed l' b/'g
~
6 0 # 7 ML /'d , k l
- 3. Identified Leak Rate:
-DOb gpm (For use in Step 7.c of Data Sheet 1 or 2) -
7'N .
's,s) j
- n 1 Performed by C - ~[r- [-), W//6<W Date k d d' {
V
- 4. Possible Safety Implications (Shif t Supervisor Check One)
Yes (Initiate necessary action) .I
/ No Explain M', i - % <t _, L,K3<, i
\ l Lt . u. 21 we c o u t ., L f '7 n .r u _ ._,.
~
l \ v ) d2. G a\, . W-e 1 4Yk - Shift Supervisor
$ -2C v [
Date
\
.{
h _ __ 16.0
~. :. .
}
4 . q
g
.W,;. 2301-3D1
" ." Revision 0
(' 08/19/77 z - ,
. DATA SHEET 3 ,
i ) 1 s j . RCS LEAK RATE
- l IDENTIFIED LEAXAGE,
.d ,,l
- 1. Source of Leakage (Describe in detail, attach drawing if necessary) ,
}3 la C W i3o r7ert of W />1AA'HP S ain f '
C A .C twG- '
\
O
'2. P,ethod used to determine leak rate -
(Describe briefly) 5 to t p.4 cc if , p o ord CM'!bkNI OV " jG? frhl /Al SV. C ALCc .
- 3. Identified Leak Rate: , ('70 [ gpm >
(For use in Step 7.c of Data Sheet 1 or 2) . 9 : Performed by M /*' / d- Date Y' H' .
- 4. Possible Safety Implications (ShiftSupervisorCheckOne) 9
. Yes (Initiate necessary action) a
/ No Explain 1., , ,[, , Lte vioe< .
l ide c 6 v e. L L [.a__ ~T~e, T ., . , _ t D (l_ f 4 0 ms R -*- L G 1 .2 C 7 E Shift Supervisor Date l I
)
. 16.0 "
1 0 9
J
. k,.. c. ;3
, _ _ _ . _ , , . . . _, p g -
' ' t
.i209 .'t i ii l > 3 11 lo-y-p) i ll xx u a->' .C ':., Q 30 l'v.d f I O p d>
8k A Y ,] N CJvee.,Y
- ) ,s. ;
1No d f, 6 ;.) f '"
; > <% zona .
tu . i go)( Y s s k ss. qnff;nh in % J ta i. - .
. , r c os 'r W I r. &
80 x ,7(d40, f x)fr,y T- k.
. . / a l %, 1nk 3010. Gr~ . bjeu/D-s O- u <
~ M'. QMbdyg[%plag.in 2l1{ 491 c ' QO/31
-3ki.=Jg[gy/ g ;e;j' ,
l
. y tipo z. re w Ds f: d n .,; R ; g g .a sihyn<u.'u,., ./m- f d } 4 ') o _' $?= v ' ,A i,}
n i- - - 9200 fs~-,urr.w.-e s/ ,% k W . eac n '& 4!b Q .Vd. bid , h if() T./w D16 .i]m~.5 h 57.sjj;
'5~uEO.
5 r W.s.1A. yM w.) lpJ/c 1 fY. v../p
.n y dya .. w').,M (4.x-i ;
. .. . . &v. v t.n .> ,
32% r vm:.wc:) L :f u k . l!c. .
/h87Y .
I h-)I //
~
I
. . . . _ . . . . . . N30 lb-EcI~' .S
_.,v3..._ . . .. S # 5 '/.:- <' .a V@pos;nor,vMy 77.-l473d)# G
$a$ '
i!) / f /c n J.y . I Tff ,
- i. .
. es **#
' 7- cD~. . -
j O 2.. Le -. .. lkl .. 9 4.
'.Vra-. . 4 s
c
. -jJ l I ..l
}a.. .;.4; poh j
-, l" ' * .; A~. f. .
5
' o Ld l
Jl' 4 Alpp- g!yd p+n %
'1
,,- o
, e *
,j l (i,
'a Lli14L U hn 4 tid ll j r
- p. * !
l h "- I. .' q, d.n@ J i f,' iN l - n -- [ U.- - g:bp. y .c p p , , m ;
"W> > '@
'e ft ;; hN
, ~. n,, c . .
- e. . e .T...U_ ;f. .om,$
j. 4 J}. wdhjl%fJ664 f h w >.' 4 h Nb
. , i. ;
".m7 .
jl pj liO g.j' 1
,m. sg';llll
,.i M
. L.. ,m. m-,l y., .q; ns ln ,- i, :"..
t ,
. . ~ - c,. i .
.n..o
,7 ' . . sv~ .., w. : .
g
.p qr .
[ g nl ge i
,t y<ggld.g q ji ;
g .m. b p i.u r i! rh. g.. 7 gn_
.m
,, u H ' . u . g J I
.! t j g b ;Lj qd.!qd.$hu-y ,)[
. t. . ,
. ... '.',N.G. I n
' ':i ,
,I $ k h 9 IbilldW h f 3@l' be h,h.
k j$ d,'h.~[. ' f' s ' . ;Py' ' .' . ', -
' u 1
9 g h.h il
.a ..! tt S;,4 hwg dmha } @,p m, 1
5
... i i. M, W. i
_l! !.h,4 . p!L, : pjhd~g an P in e is d4 n! !nhfi ,.si
, 7',
.n
.,, , . , ' [ '^ .. .
g g,,7.j c , g g. ,g
.. . v . .,
k h o, u i Mo .o..n s. M. m,l.. e
# 4yl. g, ,
cR ni M w 9..miE L7 .,
.,n.. tw . g.
. i 9i . ,
i n i : 7, .e
$ h!i!$ $ N N 0$ $ $h $ h S N
, ..$ . i ',T'- fM.;
.- c
.. c
,3l gv.w: Av
] p'W mi w . .m - v .
g . un n j .tj .;' f '. ; '.k' , y.- l k._l ( ( h i!Jh![f ,a.i!W( % ,,,hll - [! gh nj[i[I[ p4
.. f. ,k.
, M. ' ' \. .
e, yy ,, ,.y o ln ,. w -g.
. 9 :, . ,.
I-fh i d. l l h hh h - h " ql - N
. 'jsC ', U !._MYlh hi y, f
%;l,nl ildhl.
7 ". I -
~
g e :4 Sif lif:Midn! m t a g ... I
',;._.Y .y .$ . -e ,f.
y l 1 Il ! O d lh e M, ,.- l -G* C y.'k.'
' .. a p sy ea s s; a <.3, 2 .n 4
. 4. .A luq@#i W huq g
. e[ j. 4W ll h h,h dh jll dem0d -f
- no* .g I - ) l[ ,~,, I h
*s r w '; m 3 d l 0 Ibl b M !hdlTo WM l
'.l.h!b. J d. af .,
- g. }i. i A..
o e <H
- o. .
,- H ....L t.
s1g.}. ! l )L ( q.. !: ce I
;i i I :hl : i vi cs.i.a a ";
m- j g eD r . ui.d.' ; qf...,f uhl J } . f ,, . 4 li yyS ,
^
_- _ - . [ifi . m i
~'5 . f 5$ -z ~
[.Ne, '. .] C'" i '! i' l,' ' s '
~
- 9. %*' . - -car -
L.o
- h H!l 'l I Ili H ,4 !J, M l o. I '.
c; m c,
... o .,,.(, l 'I w<w '
U h, , , l, . CO N&&& P e4 V W i t M % o WId i n) O
$l !!d lI I j. VI ij hqH !I .
C1. i
., r.O C-O O . c'
- J OHD
; P l [A ,i "
k D H E E .. ".- . I j' s k jI] W[ h .. ~ o"d w f
. : o[ ,in'7..
..< 3g
- .. . Ho u. .. .. uwo j k i q
..i j wuz "I hji^ l' J.M'44..
c y se % ;.
,e ce o r m u. cacr: l l I, .. h, , V- ,i w u' M aw l u y- -
4,.. ' . -> p' a - m m m F- v m W' m i *t ; n '- L H g
;H '
. ..o El HO l l l
}y d Y i.
m. h.f..n. c' %;. W.; j:l A ,
- y. .
o n . y~ .n S, W ". m ,. '~p d;p
'k' p .
@ ^
f g, .p Tj M-L wwz 1 ;al m
- .. q m, T: g, pJ w g "-" ,
bu'.','.N. . 5a. 4"..M.G~ '*, - 7- i A
~ [ilbi i -
l .l h.i h hi h ,h hiIijlii % l)$e l @ .h ); IN,
,Ti
$,. ^
.y.g v,.;. .d.) .. bl q w l g
.~
Ip ~ i _
.:.. e,*.:;. N .s .>
,5 y y be'a,g p p
g. y1 gn q (p I 1, g;h y I
, o g c
,q .r,eq. y. .
. p.v i
!h i h g i,y m M . .
.n l l, l l,h H i l
,.y j
- ll 11 d Tpl W W l} #
7%.i@.P.T,e~i l dF @ 'O QI L e' 9 n.sp.
@bt
~
T f g Nlp M g !iplii'j4 ~1 y J.L i wJ jy.i #9. ;s. e-
.c i
l! gb i m @@4.4 i k i m l. ll I, h Eh lR Nq i p a
;a "q
4 g ..:: 4l' ' %' 'YWQw. . p w g @o,m,opn o m d .. a.. m
. / . C W .%. .i.1. A.
- h. p. hjj a ,%;h h,p' hil .
lh_M4.,.I 0 t h.o~p 1 hl Iv,b. h,l . U<n h ,.id p g _ ,'
' ' '< .. MD. .
r.. .wa hY , .v
. c _ .. v o.
h h! . Y ^ ~ 4
'O s
(
.* 7 . -.' ' , ,@. . > , .
1
..- as..
1 0*j .4 1
. MEb.m - . . . . . . _ _ . . _ .
.. . . . _ . _ . . . . . . . _ . h I,
DATE: ~ " - ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~71K: 10/ 0(20?15~ 5/78 h~+~~~ 'SP ~'
REACTOR 2301-3D1 COOLNIT LEAKAGE TEST
~~" ~^ ~'
O . . . . _ . . . . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . . __ .._ . .._ .. d
. _. m NOTE: IF OPERATOR ACTIOl DECREASES RCS VOLtt4E THE DATA ENTRY FOR THAT ' ACTION MUST BE O . _ . . _ _ . . _ . . _ _ <
O .1 3 DESIRED INTERVAL (1-8 HOURS) il O ENTER THE INITI AL REACTOR COOLANT DRAIN TNIX LEVEL FR74 PATCH PANEL DV:4#64 .
- 2.69 ENTER THE FINAL REACTOR C00LNiT DRAlf1 TN4K LEVEL FR34 PATCH PNIEL DV:4864 0 2.74 ,
1 ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHNIGES TO _THE RCDT FRO 4 DS.4...(2301-3D1) .. 4 0 , i O ENTER OPERATOR CAUSED CHAllGES FR0!! DS 4 (2301-3D1) 0 I 9 ENTER IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE FR0id DS 3 (2301-3D1) (GR4)
.17 ENTER PRii1ARY TO SECO:4DARY OTSG .T._U_B.E. . LEAK. (GR4) -
d i 1 TCA THA TCB THS TAVE- PRZR LVL MUTK LVL RCDT LVL TIME O (F) (F) (F) (F) .(F) (IN) (lN) ~ (VOLT) 0:29:55: 5'7'73281 591.102 570.867 590.703 530.992 223.893 65.520 2.600 J O 63.012 2.740 1:29:55: 571.664 591.273 570.930 590.906 581.183 226.932 i j O
~
O GROSS LEAK RATE (<30 GR4): 1.2434 GRt
. . .. . . . . _ . _ _. . _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ . __.y 0.3267 GR4 ,
0 L. TOTAL IDENTIFIED RCS LEAK RATE (<10 GR4): ._ I O. L UNIDENTIFIED LEAK E (<1 GR4): 0.9108 GR4 1
.payJW"a. .
~
~~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~
f,e - .lPERATOR: -
&C: tim..:
APPROVED: (/ /d < j
,.u.,__...
i
"- ,s. _
~ ~
My . . . . . _ var *y - I*CMMJLL'." . . . _ . _ . _ . . - _ . _ . _ _ _ . . y, .__ ,
<.4, ,
'a .
- 230i-3D1 l .. / Revision 0
~~, 08/19/77 -
DATA SHEET 3 - RCS LEAX RATE IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE s i
- 1. Source of Leakage I (Describe in detail Muu G AP b o/nattachdrawingifnecessary) y /_/mW = /, o r GOM m u -V -l *7 / 00 m L./mm -
, op g 4 fp) mu- V-/3 7 C /ornt/prov = ,coac cpm ;
- 2. Method used to determine leak rate (Describe briefly) d/LemiST' picVM VAGMGUT' f 1
- 3. Identified Leak Rate: /, 08 gpm
- es (For use in Step 7.c of Data Sheet 1 or 2)
I )
'%.J Performed by b '
Date/O f_
- 4. Possible Safety Implications (ShiftSupervisorCheckOne) 7 Yes (Initiate necessary action) .I No Explain LL:
1., - p --- hT.;.? - 5$7i . F' Shift Supervisor Date
- v. , .-
3 16.0 ES._ i ..
- r. - - - ----- 9
_.m- _.-_. . _ -.. . ..- --< , - _,_ -9 ._. c ..--- m _ .
- f. . .
p 2.. p .>-tY , xlff b -- .. ' 9 "O Y[
//~? /c . f"
//.f0 l'/ .'
.I
/ye4 1 <c. K4/ ..d ,e u/A-:. :
ecx p.= im ;j/f' e ah.'.d6:. 2i.e.- u-
/-r si - x c/a . u crw cy' s q, .? 'A":b,k,,..k dj,e + <12cK -. isco 3-
- . L .:. I pi: . . ia e I (%. tm~ (4- < ~ - .. />c/ A.
c.,u.r - n.y " n' ic a:. ,q ns .. AC. //rf /'lj.
, fxr,,;T - /es
- 9' 3' "l '? "'' /3'$ b
/s/9 Sd i .
(n. > r - wyy</ n p.y/ 2 s.y avv ..
/3/ 5 X j ku wo ^
o, c.,-
/E%yd.:,, /4../. os. : 4. . G< ( . S.A .
.c.alJ '?.* 7%.cl. ..
/fjo h, evn . Try,rc / i'* .h -/<A.< /. . - .c < f &f. / ra< . &
"Y *e,y. i. e..- l' ,ew 96 p. .c...r .ut p '.cf. .
W: i ; -twe AVA</ .u c. ..,,/ ~. it(c A ,O S . IM %- 1 /.Cci u St.;yeel M -to /flf -// C4:* c/ b$'*t- 'M i595 IW o c.- % L .- ,< d ( / c u . /, . .. t5@ W; en- (ds:,.a,c.es c- 'r/%<> b.L m1 h
,) ; ee n .6 t.,f z..cl t.w.f d , A " p.. (, . Mn% (<'c I t
.1 e u, & c L . ce / L ,, d tv a '.c ft ~ a> / . . ) s -v:.'/ .:. . 19 54 i N ,- on f,au<( i.e.,e/ L v- %f . e s o v ~ ~ G> 2 % j m' 6\5 W
; :> n. .Lc. ' b ' ~%.. ./ .
I% R(.
; e o,- s/.~ Ac/ //19- Pi c 1W W
.l t c e. d te ef.: < el l .:- .! L. u. ,c. p
. .u (-j rKf. . l%3 0,.,
Fyo W
- e. u - C1.. , ./ L ....ct % vo x f. .. e es. ,L. , . .
CG.,'[kw</Se.lf,v i,, /4.e/ <r.,/ it ./.s- </ /k 1 :cg ifI5 gC. R2i A l (o n. c X ,/,'n.,.
; .e,c e e G.scet n...e la w% att, e c./e,, c., ..jc/; . .. A 6 fu..
- ! . cc% /he</ sc
,f,;.fu .
I970 (L{j
..} .
r u, - l'h!<<d 'na.:,y's,:r ;.. c;v.:.Ce/ cl..;(<f
- s. .- !. , c, ,., j Im V-
'1 1.'% (1% & ;
-{.:
l'v.uc( / ji h:. , ' . -yj. c,:It. a e( ' kic.; , lWI Sl
, ) , $ c ..;y.,i.? -
h1i ,c
/ WT u#(n s 9-J /h-/ a!> A cDr* '
. , d r;. b., . a. L .f., 'e t,h bIh []v
'; . 1 eror t'.,. ! n t.L a e,. ,./; xcs. .
,W5 C
} c roo cp .f cs-v -o'fis 93) (.C,{ l
* ' c rc y' f/. . / A. . .../',.; 11., ,. / 9., .7,'. ; ,. ,A , *y
.. % ./<. .L &c . r.. .,r,., /. ..., !
o()o /L .l 8. . i e,.i , .', //a. fi* , .k [
"yi%. c r. - o Ac a r* de .a is so 9.2 // ,.,
.t {
0 i ,. e N /,, e,. , , ; < l
,,),, ~
0,.. . A ,
.. !%o !LJ x. ,1 g y ik ,,.; ,.; , ,,
l \ l b.. .. . [ _ _ . _ ,,_ ,_g 251 1l i
,, nr l 9m (c c./r'd.)
ys /// 0 fl~. ? /E ... ) /,s ,sd./o l:/k-:. .
,;f /c. Y( U 'k / // tft0 SI f~f#-V-7f'il6
- f' /;co 5h/1afl? 9W Aay i~e/4 -
, Lw:~ (4- .~ !ZhZEAndkHkZKL lH. 2MSr fh. &,, d 2,o.y gy,,,, g,,,,Y 4.1 ,g 6;j y ;
r gi e9 /4 /frf /LaJ 0 A* < J'di.< in ,t/~5 .I'c 3 - pxo pel Sn.n / cu /' ,6 g,wef,99. c,,.p.p,y '
/3/9 S & IU'c w r .pA r; ,. n J a. 5- c o -so , .
avv - p p
/3/if Ne A ff de) s95 . .
'lfse D h h e d & _d m w h z E y , h & % .z g 3 p' ht tra, , LAfMEro).i/K. ;.a
'.
- G feuaZ~~ i fN/' 15io &a sac l$N ChNeb -4 Alede ^$ fjhb'~ $
..i>y 195 IL-A R P5 b'e. .wly - con % Srll9 I T
_ _ . 1540 -jud lic-P - lA, IB no1 lEl 6%n - //9? p
.. 61f03s /fc5 h.+w~ - /PP7p i ) g .2 % P50 51h+60' ZC- P - l 8 f.rt Iht(sa (sA~- '
q 2y,p,/ .:. . 6\5 llCS ~6m - 19%pp
~~
lNT R(5 [hm - /330 g u.ad
> kj l, 1903 (%p bf ict ?/d15 sy FtJ Lahl *,Gh&
, MN^>5 BA 4 Rc es f. ,. . f@ $tyed G !4-P !A,IB Ifl5 El5 Sn" ~l9T> &
I d b 1. a % 1 RSC .JGadal & /k h De -Wkecf k <tMS { l' q ,:gg'. ~ R$ 6,p d \$ l l Plu.d 12?5 % 4c ' Wgy~ 4 1970 (?)codud sc. fa , Phaci EwyF c:a A.ps dl'il
/432 JN(</ GJ nst RCS 6tm \
fi4 Su I
),
^
JW1 &wud o' 4 5 Alu-FR-P-l6 Mi ecs4mnv 1470 ppm F-9/9 WT$$ flcs Buem 11'40 PPM
.a 4..f. 'c (,6 blh }di E p .a l k 5 90 ft~ pl05-l.7 Q)?S CF-V-I A, tB l
9 30 IXf '%m 14 Mff v\ _
? M i+ A .a W& j
') l l
l
**J$ se's* J
- j ,
g
*1. 't l 3 j' . l l l I f . Il f ,I g. E' -
... l i 4 lglljhhSil,t!'m)lo,to;eM.. i; g .@., n4 .Mi,h h.hb. h, l
%- . ;y r.M,m.l I@;il.! P.%.
I!
!po:j pt .. m'jpl! -s
- I dh !y ll.jp TMt% t de - ' .' t..c-h.. @ .
.t : fb I &cS OW. E ' e, p s Ndi N'h
_iir Oj!jMk u g..m. p giritti J.,
- e,gA c
%u. gj.,M, , %y.h ' W im.q,guLDULMg.d-3 , p . . . ;- y.: .
~l pI. -
n j .m q v%a ..n. o[7d {u% iibbn 1, l d sr m.,,s . .p h it. m lir Iq w{a i , on
' [v. . . .
l[ ]i 0}M.L,, hj $ !f 0 d,0,j E d9 , .. y I. 3 @ JH - I e p 3 O - tph[B 1 U d, is@! y:h s . h{ j!L. ! j idj
. g. 4I (l, 9a . n,.m! aqR I H. nlit.l G -
- 2. .. :. . s.2 n _
b ' I d u, l,i.u.,m.4 n
..l i
Ol @ ll hn z-hl,O ~n h, G l." $ i!.4 d.. ii P D U.
' .iJ .
. .g
. ,'l 1 47 n &.
4
.e s
m . uin lim !iri n! a m4 mHMg.Wrg. .pWidg o c m'} h -- hnpy.l 4, J f
^
. - m,s*5 .
E iiiiiUiildf.j!LBUI[$oG!iiiUididilib [rri _I ag 1) iii!-l
;. .)
y.
. e j{ m ][lip}%mm[a! Wh t-e
=
[ Mlth]r)rdo))t u 1 unni N i itpw,nnnng_! i w M, c.. . G v- . g- n y,y r' Hal J.i, i ' #cdy
- q. . ' . e
.i ', ; ; ! <. p_ .u
,] i.
w+. L 1. 4.J ~;.. w,4 -
, 'I~
i i ' w nm ~[ l a w a:n.qu:e(([i M. L . o a :
. x. g t
.9.'
L F@: - y l J.t ' b c.
..N.~hfrr_r,nm,(((y((,j_ tgl g
.b ia. .n..n 4
j i t a ' i t . ll ; o > .n7 ,i ll I -r.
~.-
i c s{ :
,s,,w.i m ,
i{: o. es. .?m.'M u) ., 1 l i .
!r f
M
-- Il h.l.}
l fll l'lf ll
'lj )}i}llg 43 ,
i ff 0 JJ 7[ g.[ f f !,[ r - f, y [' h'- ap 7 n , q . M ,&. .
"I Il [hlI! ib Inf W&. mc Bi li: B MHlMtMGMBHM
~~ M!!HM -!
mo ~
... p! # ',.. N . .
.c U <h U *
#s .!:r. m b .. .. ~ + rti " 'u nnb!n2 un n n1 h ut:umb i-bth,t h on e t '.
o, ,m r .:n. ae- nR a. U ds
. wx t
dii bhi$ lheh ' ' YM .
'J "$mvk.s lc , .
k ! k' id. . . a 1 igj in.U H4 Wmo W$ iiH' i1N I h h dji nj 7 - -f
'Y '
# i s: '%
likkhj
~
pj hlQ sp', 4f'M i M ll N Y ' jk
.+:
i. I 1 ih nM d i U@. dpi9
' ILl
! t
{f a 3 Min ji,j
}&"I II II I
%uu i
l H f c:4 <% J." 1- ii ljD rr 4 ,. l w*:!;:
.,g".M{S
~
3l h c,qb H :
,- W.
y)j.I'n'1.j. W ,H@ri% ,l p! l i j 1p . . S in d
. ' ' i
.g i i ln i
! nii '
n ! ,a
~
Jg J. U l1 m WhitimIi l J
- LT in j UH!!!I '
'?
a iu lim an mqC@iTWe Wim m c ,u m m ,.nmn in
\ +
~ 3
. g 3 .;9.y..T -:.
9 i i ng' W irc u; Ice o i on mq 5 [g q .fj {i,m y i .. g ,$ e.. q.,u
.~.
H - hnI [qh yI 3 ,. . 1 g [ [ .., 3 q L ; l {q '
~.
.D , T.
Y W .!. ., g h
. v[d.h . . .. ' ,s'
, . m.. ..
Y. ,
;9 ,1 n m a ..L m ,.
d
'..u n.. g,n
. M, , J ; g . s. . L o.
E M Mbk,, c pr%.,l.(ngmw ow J '
,3 I
,g
{@n H. g a o,' L'-
.' i
. I;hhiM :D ui: W., Man: n W, iny c n .
m'
. <. s .. ) - -
me. s in.,. u.num 4 v+ .. g y y. - . .
+4 ll) flh Ifhk!
i b[ I I l 't j ..'i P :!k - N 9N . -
. , * ., ' .,;
- q , t f f ;
!l 'l; ' .
lt'; 'f[j !!.: . l* lih l .
- Ea ,
h k]:)jfl l l h Y l k wlw, . h 1 l ,.e
._0,:hk a w -- y! 4 9 w nl mll lj ,n 3
t M
.a .m -- Si.m<,. - m.s %
# l l ih! ,ly. '
jp ! ;
..il Il l l a !1 ih 10 tiil . o m.s.
"' ,:y,i, n .N
',4,
'I il .-'
i ,~ : i~ q
. i
, l. b .i n. . :hTm!
q4
.z.4 j
f $ .l ! Hl! 'dj-jlm i
.h.
q ,!c, q . y'hlm 2 l
@ Ih h 30 I II s- . I
., 1 r i m ml
'(' ~ /": C' V,. .;
f
.hQll hl h h h l i h lwll) 4%u.
l li w i w r Ie,! w'0 ' ,
- ...s ' Iy!.)(
~ '
NN@ r kml hl $!h' hl.d$YdhMh i 4 "y p 1 i L A,: l: so@q!ud@, .... 1 :
. .vW l I' lpion p ui sp a n I _: s M
". nMi mi ih mnuin y_.'
R I H ; g nh a g$1! e &-
.u y.m ygy I
yng n47f + S r '. u-p m. 'l i[,g [ q y#d! I [0 b i,y d igi Z nil ] f p _, g My$5 U.I S h,lh j iWhh.a.g$ l0!!!!lll Di
'c ; I i
i[ sd 4 1% al h "Ic i: i- i [- " j!;, . r, : lHilini$l:,i % i,n nw ilh Al i ! *, - p' rn 7 .
-An .+
ghphMpp I f p y p' a ' l4
! ; i j p$yE'i l ,n kh l
% Hij it
. -ce ed... r?1 s . ., ,. i l :! m l. o y,y i
! m he i n!s o m~
es.e }o
.. i i
S jj i "J +#f i a, rn: I N, y a 3 i j ,
... .1 3,
. n.,
,o o
.L.gIL v,nq, n
p,d' 1 r a, qju.,i x* ri,i n :
. q+ v.. p , ,
,t " * "
p J'~u '< T
,;1,5
.-cqw i
c.
.p .-
- ?"'Mpui ld *U d.e .
1 914 [;q$p I Ji
;+j M"'*c i,aMs- [ri g
,h q .
q 7 : .g
/ .;., c . !;' '%.
?-
ji "d? I r M HW , i iWH1h ,i i. n M , J
.,o i. .
7 i n
.m[
~l
~j
- 4.e. .. . . g g ) a ,1h iil' h, I,h ' -1
._ r .~. l i 2 W. 2F g#y,$.f." 3.y*ii h j{
fI ]g,l
~
'[ 1f 'l Q ~[]
[
-4
[
.' m< - I p l Al.u@ m t f jil-f mn' h I W N, $ d
{.O.
.- i w.
o i t le.@.m' #c~& r R4 [l ,' q It i hr s . - , . . i a d ] e c1 .1 7 n .
- ^i a a$g+.9%.y f y.,
,,e ihj:.:, : .y ;<%,.< !lhll ll ; hl. I l}ell lolw h ph I
, ./,] u:7.h! 9 .. b,2.,
.w
.'d f+lpli .m,.hn l
. :. . ;-. .,.:.,..,. .". . %. ..] l
,7 ~ : ,~x q: ,, .
a m i o .r j u
..;. 3.... m- ,.
YM'fs.k. M- it f ill I ! Oq;ph f i j'a l bl [" } k hfkkt.h.h!
.-c.s_":c.m a a~t., M,
[ A. w...wme. -l..d r
. r:s y che lujg m cJ, u m,.4 whm., me. g.
h i N}n t i 4-
.'f' 4 : c % p/,:j
.i, ,
..,J..'._* ' O.
. . u
- f. .l L' ' l.l b. il h. ,I f. hj lIn l ll l lMI ,. . Et* ..
- 1. k.
* ; . p.. e - ..'/. ., . . . . . - _ _
; i i -
.< - .c-
; y. w . .s w%e'J*b
%.' y% ,. l l l I T m.~. 4: ...
l ;
&g i[ 9;c Ql}. p; e i .1, :n
..t v I.. il -
i l
-~l l ~]-
.< s.e.
- ; m r"
~
4 j . ll nllq- ,q i p wg e m~
; [ 'i "
1o IL 3; .;. , I NU[ i s .i . l..Y l. Ml l b Ul h fhh (( I b 'l h, ( .O j.-. .l f ' l I ,i ll e :a j
.. o - - l . ~- : - }l :4@
M
)
c., g kd
' i
.e i It 1 Mji D li hRN H n , T$; t%' ' 7.M M l
, v.g ..
gr77minggy rp yg-rgpriuhg:97373w; , 3 f. ~
- 9. 9, d* d* J *'#
,.<8 '3' *
.n. s . l gQ g }in ggq &' N8 J'*i". ~y.
. .. ., j .
9..: n y. + . .
\
. ., ;yww, n. ,,# a rm su, k(a at enM t_ c 1 u .
.. ,. i u(n ,
9 . n . . , , , ,4 a- :: jIyy jyur
. .: : g g- tr T w, . s.
. m. . . .
j i ; nt ] Wq 7..L[ti.m a .4 a-
. . ., b "J,1, 1 %
y-l g[n l . y r. wwlx k I i p : l [ JF_
- 4. ..
,. m. ,:a.gt i
U @.P'. .m. . . . . . i i i]', i!l, [I]Q W {!{[M - i .0lT[h]if # bhi in gTiitis, ?! . ; -
' ' 05.f.4.o. )
,-[:
. 9h -
I hd hb I ,f ll h h +- a... un ic h m m a s,rj : i J 9:p tv :,Am.J
- tw kh w . S. .A % I hn @* I crw n.n.o.n. a.,..w i [l ff[ fi Ih[f fi ((I( IO n'[ffik 5h A hIIII .l . l.h'M a.,' .gD k 'y M,*;
, 2 r. . w
.e n m.a itumc n %me. irr im _i wm. .
l h j f a l t f ff l ,
.$ l MMNm i 1111in b M W 4 4 itl C M bm: T V "! 4- '
- ***a
*h (? * ' ' '
f ,li 8
,1,,
. i.$d i(3
- l
_r'a-- Il 1 5
^ . 6 8l ,% *fl -
!l lll I
; g,,,f
.e '- '
-4 P '. ' ' . 1 m f'p M pnb)m,m @!!
,e5,[ ' sj b l f n b ll !ll ll ?,
agh[ g.- n I g ] . linp,
*/p g\
~
nI I I m[* vt Np l l!
f
!..:!ll'*
h'd . :. 10 hl .I i yhI J p
- h. H l,3 .i
- '1,
- v. rn.t _
=
8lhh 6e n' ' ' ' #) t -
+ ,
4.*,,* I-0 l g 8'1 = .
, '3 / ! . .' g,t*:F'- M "d j y ,
-'i ' * '
#[
. .{ -
' * ' ^
I l ,. f i r ! -T -
. l l H 0lf 4 .
; 1 M] ;r lL {l : M%.f.j1& Vg $
l g, j
'I i t I t, l l ; - - ! i z;l 1 1, i peg ' '* b l[ ,'
ff)
~'
e tj ! [ ! l 'l ll , ,,' , AMiHfiD 'I n h li Mn f})if0)ii{i
~4 Til @., kuy '@l :. c.
} i N]II kp ,-
8 8
;y ;,
g .
,l
- 1
""I 1
'l J C[4 '
e! i,i p! S t' ul il l
- r l
. Il l1 t UMt ff M. [
M* s f b.l. I h J We
,. 18 1"*. .C I '.". # p Q i Ul : I 1 e ,.y
'TI[]l i [j i' iq q i 1 g l l t il]
i
,., i YE. (.k .
p l I
.s e
.c .
m .. -
.i j i.
u f i, l l , lh o -l . dlWi m, # e .. me e,
!.! ib
.,/ja O .- ,
l , lli l l. ! I r . y
.: . vn e g. w.
. 1
.a .
- . i .
1 i
! i ; ,: ll l!
Ji i l l lM< e . . , .
.v ,,, . . . f I e * .' 'ha ( i y,
&,me .i.w .:o. .a l ,j j h'iln j .j n
..,or . ..
, -jj -
t-l
;p .
i u.-: g l , ,, h i
; ;~. .. .
. m.%.
,4 0-f ' * * . * *
-d !
l l f ,_.O ; , , b.- [p uf%g%m m ~.e 2 ., W 7 4,I Yfi.,T1 i, -
; .q[-g.,*..'h.
c N 8.r* *' v h Yldl hI $ i i l*; OfD ! 1 h, lal.lJ .il ) 3 a < bY',e .- mo .Nq' * ^
. . Ii l : .
;! l 4y j i l -
' g.,;. ,,, ; hIj i o ,
o 9 u.r .
$gv
[ g. ,jg a . !i ii I j i l g !p pg ^
, / ' f k k ', *$ l i . ,,
y,j
,,,,,,g
[
+
g' nn n g??p**i f '1 el lgfl5 o 4.C ' i , ';'l 1 ig n m gl 'jt1nj
'f f
gi ' m a w af. f. ,,, -* p' *t . - ,- q [ '.' '
.gq.i. g' "'* .
. ,.g.- .
~$
s-, ' ' , '
,e t l
-- -.l ll -
l llhl lI lll- l. osn
* , Q ,ja.
.u. h m -
j 7 .. . I
/
I ' m i! l dL 3 ' .V. W . .2 ys,aF h[pi
.. I -
1
- . r.' .
-: .m- *
- i d I i
r h1 I
=
i y-" .+r ' p di i , 3 f(s *' (*f)g#(3 f,.*, I*)w .' l i '
? e .c, y,1.'.' k Nl lc L i I i d_1.!b I I d' "' a 4 M.sp g 3 ....
I pp gp ieq g - y ,J j yIh gL g i gj p ;p je j ;n p y l gg-7
,s.
. f . p, e.e g ..y g
'#ech{ ,
- 0.: - '
t .
. . 1 ,. ., r . . + L . ,
- a. . m r o ip m a . dv
-l g l qg l
lih na I
.k y qt g i l 11 I.
g , w- q:. n.;.3/ ? ,'.3 -l g }"lg j y7 _ p.
-j..g .
Q
..~- * '*
f qq t ,
.g y...gg.
- m. qq _ a , ,
gl[ Q p fj p }gl j f :.L9. y . ( }f ; l,,.:s .
,,, 0, . [*
- y b
_ f l ,,
- .. m. .. ; a o j y ,a Je[;
n j pi ni, ug e.
- :< ~'. -
i ClIo! D mj q. h ,al p 91' N 9' n V W? nmir @l,,lj1! rlOW
.. m. .Q6u a;<m.m3 . Q, c.y . ! i _
. 3(%.. . .. @A
- g. 9 M. ., 'M.
I s- .. t I l-q .,Nl, im mi l,w e; g, .,4, f gh J4 gj , n . n,,, ,nna IF.c / , 6
~2 W .A -
- H -i g l 2 7 ,' y a p i c'l 1 p .l .u g . g lL l i p r in ,( f,w, i h. il,[],. 'l.
, ,h, l
.,f ;I %.y
- s. -
a n [alq(([n n l . f.k. ..M N . [ ! l ! l l :,.? ?f;
,j.j 'l l Q, .(
- e , I l l j i i :#j! ji ls all g l l '4=%e
,,"'14 ]', , , .
.p l l I
l .l j;l, i;li l' LU . l l.p . .g ... l a.a u . l
' .$b *d b =* l. p f f; l l [ [ . [f ' l ',, i il 4. ; h, i j 'l . ll *
- L, [. 9!l 'I M!; h hh h * '
-h'h )
m . ll !g c@g. pr
. . ,. r . - n,. q- l m p
.;,o,m
, pi$.A
;%.piljg.;'in$.<;.W,4Jpq;qi'[!Qii,,
1 r;
"h . e.a,
* , 1 ,
. . v e ~, ,
l ' l i ii a , e p
,! ll . -
a y gt.g qj ;y g, ,s_ c ';.5 H i n f Jy( j t ! y ,r p s - 9. q a.3 l[ I. 9i hin h ll h 4
,l T' "i .. .a . '?d .
Il H! I b]j$bs M (! ll[$h nd S ljp h hl]i! [jlIIFl i e ' .y.U..N@i ln A'If,~ m@.ilm i inn, -.weg i u)- p..g p a
..., I! ii iiii %wIlh g n ITl i , i . n ni li ih n ,., .
!gmy g
.f.
Qw I qny. - . . tpg m. . .- ggl.g ' y yhpum }9iW 9 u( g( .
. .; T7 .
i, . unW a. m . 93:.x no ' nr i i n j~n i l 1.L [a$ 3 7 ".. . . "i ;j yj f[ ,, [] [ gp;
., ,, ~~T" f dp jy l 2
g g.,.
. I,:_; typ;.9 yp y,.4 g I g {ty r7ty a y,.y y,lgg-g-y i gp p y,[. gg.yn
. ... , .m - -
,, a. z y u.g.t j..
, o.
*J'. ,
. c.a.. .
Y l g I i i I. ..I i
.ff ik m u n i.h., .h 9 i h
i
,huth gu. iti n
a 7.
. h (
- i. .
ig r e + , m. 3, -
. . .. .:e. . .
flt *k ' *E **k.
~
~
t k l w.w w
%j ,.'j,I. T @.h.M.~
- n. ~ . . . . w * .
i
.y,x",.!.hI}:
~
} N! g.i.w u
- f. v r4, e M.
j [ ( V
, . x. .e,. r,. s~..
-{
le . I, I ! ^
. i. .i ,
- t. 'l .' A . .
, ; , i r ~..x . .. N. q.P-
- l. .pa ht 6 ,
r- . I. * ' il 4 l[ 3 . - t., ,9, .:'.... J i;Q'. h. 4 - t[
..) .[ll hh" [ ff
. .y
, -f l l , H j .l ; b. l l, . 1.'.- / Q;,,Q,.gli,g{
' 'b:.i.f9)! ', V,8 p
! ii 'j jy
~
l
"} il .! .M n.Wl6 *.Q,4F:
O .l U !! l jj i! [-I I W9 p . . .- .s 8 a l " ' I - - i [- rlh '- n p [ ]} ,'
, .. e- n
- a. 't.
,]
m, m q li j m * . p p A :..-p. w ,.t.h-.:.. y.i Q. ' .L.y. ' *. . Jlj . j]
, a lo j
J , i
,;,,.2 c. a.~ p ; m-* Q; 1
}
l (u t 7,yggGQg g g..,_ N .:y; . . 4~ g 04 r 4 pq y y Tpg p 1" +qs # y
.$...y I d did. .k.h.,il glM,i 7 .lli._l.i 1 ~
, li .-.
- 7. y. -
N il li ., .- N%. . ..._,$ 4 . ,e 'l' 4 . *. -
) U*. h.
p - 1 . . 3 ... p i . q._ .. . , . . _ g .7 y J. h ,i di k :..g. ~ h .h. , ,hd dlhrr i, . v W...w n
.L m,ill%,l yrn n
,! j,
. a I g w .awo
.y.e
- e. tg 7.ygg c
. .e ,
n i i , i i g j,l ;, [ y o .g.5
. . a s i; . ' , . '. I pi l. 1y Qp ij 4l :!i I
, l I I [ ! .. it.y';'5.",2 J~ '~ x ls 2.,sJ, 4, "
., u.R'.3.
., L
. c. w.
E g]ulM 7
.} ul ,f o L' y gji ,
!? N',j
[FJ ppi [s[ h[--}} R pkia
..- 4:@N M.f
.a i n
. 1;M; .;,i' . ;g LN [fi j" y d,gg jMg ggg g {4[
J" [ dh ih h h l gl df !] ,
, l
, . ,.g.h{#
4.gg:g.
;,e:,:.~
.x..n.
. ..: .. .c. . I in ni u p; Wl@
I! I, i yj p g p ou l- ~y ei i M A 9 ,- e.s . m;m. " .. . se e s. 34 d @4.M sa m e ~ip7 u 7 n
. .w > s .
~'
%n i
p4 H
+ m. .
>4! ,
i s.na ,
- n. a, - .
n rl hH1 ,i n. n. -
..w.pg;
,.y..,,,*
4 F. ;'P l
..l.
. . ::e - .
l l [ lt! Ni l .I I r H h l l l - . '~. ** Y$ , 'fhb.
'ile.i -%U rjg;i ji g m.,j. Wg n ;;. l:
. .: W I
l 4,, ' ,D ? Ql. - D,'
-> . y$; h99y fl1@h $$ L i.) L k "-WF
$ $) d ng&g.
p$!h;g! y w - y 4e p# . M. <-... u -!
?ugg.r y cQ%Lik n%w - -n.mgJg.,x
%q)g<&g;o upy yq,iujinn
- T mg.p g um pg- m.+. a g} %ob o
Ip3q ,. yM y ' p . L .. 1' .4 r s/ M
?wp.1 } d Hj ii l W ,h.pf'!"lli .fl I
m:i$c
-_ .q. :.,4.% .,- d u hmf.?
l t .
- ..m._.di .m. .e, _.
%w@ en j!![u a ofmWA- ,
%$y{ . ., . ,. .
j 8 l f iP S h, ' .;j:' #'.* l C!: 4 dieC me rn4!"mdun'!wA i!:n - ' .l C.
}. WI L
I 1 Nnt N.. ' M f?mL
1 L . 1 - o a
-.x ---y.1ym,=.~ ,,, .
.2-r --+37~m'- **T1m.p..-.am- n _.,,
46S 4.g
'] -
'0 l 1( // 7 ff. e ps- .,
(6-1-16 ff- v h/-s, f'P 'hJ' M ov h
; ?3er fej$r.'e/ -fie .sf.ll Ca.n'L > n ~
. 3 ~ .n. pi,J c..M ,,- p y.n . .n cus m -
k
.AoOS 'o.>% wp , ides 2. <? fr r* r 3Cf1 b -
i& 1 ,. 93 pc e t. a o n ,e p ir r o.oa ,.i a;l 4 , n .ir s f.x ,
~~l1A
, p 3W fa tre<>' mcaF Jt -.
33'lo ' 40 7 1 1.qre rs its.ti b
..' R% tt i 3 Frart(p Cf J qu~r?
i cop {k co d 'bt b?P /*** te' 57s'r.rt' . . .
*) OW ? tvPN3) o 73 0 ho Goer Ar Jrst rW/ J i' /~% f~ f - lbhm
': e c' L'O SRss/&C iJ T." s:pctc ftYu. 4r.9 rwr.A
- DOX$ O O r.'
j'fs :=n i SCTs!!erl f'S '# 106. 01.*LD bC nL**
~ ~
t /4' f Dis)fk(Y $t ce Me1 to ' C 1 . s retr 9 ' f.< repree.,trevko sir.i,~ Ge.n cla,e r , s % "' . o S +o 0 O N GCoct Cesco- snet'cs' WI to us's r' .1~ , Crd<d! VA'* A Cl*IO 0.s?Y i At:e/1w. . f'l ,t - -. f-J
/C-9 9ft' k., .
- O?vbkCluEttda't;kt 4l* (,- $ftO* ~$lrdt$)E26 25/$ /%Ofpd '
j l*S2's,,'W feYS.xl b d E-<-~ 0m : A ~'c . ;;ov. en -p NG . .
/;99 9 f) g y'dk "e-} . . . /:s fa ,4. : ..
I C r:' EsG .-* <' A N'..a.l<ff-l'1~~*s. ';?P . s 't n 'V 7. & C ' . t **
- fsy/f f
/s'
/Y?r l' f ~ ' .3 . ._ ,fg ,
I ?t;'.treot**a Ph ~; .f. Fs' /.r s..( t It /?) * '$ ' l ; . .
//*f$ flz 11 l 't e ja.s. .. .* t .' .m: b.-6J-7 :. A c. . v 1 s..
2 l9 't 1 0 f *s. I\ s!- 3. . ,, , l,S"60 h Ifci s' rep 5 O ss' f - ?. st 1 A .: , .e { el 15 1 w. ('~f-
'a' 'Al M- Lt ne t-d ?' i s s' A*/ lc; % G.d . /[f/( gf.
,2e 1/ >~
I, */ H f f.tTju '1*s.-r 5l ce...,.a n d .1 G t-- j mr .vy tr 4 e. : u .< A . ._ A40 St{ b * ~ ^ -- $( .', Al36 ' e ....
?
Rx S /o u K3f) Ic)/os /7 sr To ms . 1 o /12. / 1 9 . ft . ' f I .
\ ." - I V, .
j
. 'i t p,3 , 1 i
{ -
'4 , h*
; ,1 . \. .
p
. q
l
\
{.* g...-.:. n :.- _1_; . 3 , 253 1 ' l'<PihJa Wi-16 f/ '1 hriM W *1
-k.% &u s,
I Cf'ods tr> 1 sev.&T- &< M- -,R ma &s,4asoW , suev. M v ,
)
3 y_ (Ja
- Mb. EM% oss ca a
%. R &D ustw w,c w wsvL A g j
I
~LA SM Lewl
/o' m461 9'
ateo vers:q . meu,% r3, ,, ,, s
.- {
R3g.37 1%4 %oo s . ' gc/ t flu.47 54.t' S3':/
~'
2411 ttno f9. CS TbRm T ' %,\* m /0(,54 002.5 0.ey,- $ 3_ _._ g M l't,,2.-7s LE ,
' l <*'f I's 26
. Ot2D 29 ,/&
- I tos -7 g L$
\
, . < r, mo " oMe OJM Spl,& 6Amr w9 44C Jg p. car W l rat.n n v4<. - Q WTO Odds.l Joy GomT jA gcar'h*
\
f-J
&;2u'1sr3Nwp ic+n' & A,.*a./' 74- 0 J. Fr c n,A W s a L 5u a . LG ,
AIL. -
/.9. 10 B C uc. #4C< dDE &i,. ek '
- . /.:sJo' No. / A A.s.4 , a' p?ge ,f'd*< d n, a sse /
. , L7. e o '. L i P p//f N/'-/1- J.# Ef 1% /n' s a J .h o N re. -
deso nl5?.s
. . . _ . . se ~, e u . , V, +
/ 41. . 7 9 ' L. L. //fd f/es / a'? 6 es,. /fc L < ~ru,; { Q ,.,l b-w... G G'h,? ,
pc . .
, ~ , . . . . Isto ('7- 3.) 6 a. L Pe A: u r>,r'%; sn,h , 6 s.h -, As .% .as
. . . . . . ist c adha 9 W L-s uu'<3 e /Mm r (
. . . . . . . _ . . bVr -QIl>J OW dk 1 W4/c/%
hvo .sh4d /h.t +4~JL u.J % 3Gc See .. Also Sla~bdC W 9- /d/c .
... . . . - . . . .. 4 -
J . _ _ _ ._ __ . . - . - - r 'l -- eem . ,.#
-. .. . /. (s f
. ~
j
. . _ . ~j i
. r t #
8,
-l r l'
#{ g
\ 'g
.. J
x
,4 m- e. .
a , m, ,
-~ _ _ _. ,.w.-- n m .e - . . --...u . :.
,-.n-
.- mumx. ---- . ,_ _
l
. .L .s . i v
b 5 3 /,'.,/2. l/ p..;;ii., . g f .4 3.K hr.h${ fe% th&, l 1731 g\ Dn /f 5 b('jo .40T, 3 CH o;p% .'r: ag.rci.. f.c r b>m l%'7 i d , dEIM . p$3 (Q
'6*hy/ ' Wad es'< &> d l. A ?.~.:d : h e ><< / 6.e 1
a:.ucae, 1:</ u r.;./ 8:ar th .un,,,, ut.wpo.,,4,,, gp gi ls.N '7/ 76? .i ' f bea.>p wti pIc. l' det s J.G l.'s.PI;' <h y
- ^
onJ % l<., b"(~, . , y c. > c tv.,, 9).,,,s; /.,,,e).6 o y, g., p3 . a.nl (*dsy.y} /Jf,qjQ d.,, t j gj.b,,,,,J,.,k,,,],f, Ijfh,,,
~ *J M i(t-:. fA:.v. A et. *H G.i , .rG;<.p. y.* ag : r /}} 6.7%
i
. y.y y
[ g,3o cd ..
; ,.; -ot W .
< '/? $1$ ,f ME-f-/4.s <l/.A f.)C, lg .y/ /g.f.l} > ,t:( f'.tf ... ,995 gg)f
[ i i' l />* ff' st. '.n'< llw C's
.. 99y Q ,,e Mdal 22 '~%.0 $ .~.& y dre .<,%;9 a sal,:h.i:2:l.b er)/r
. ' ,,; O '
,- '; . 4'.R.:Mr h
v . JlU) //> G../W/9ltk-)-l"cd$g'~'n'/'f C'l.1$ O "//s.!I.:.lc *~tb)rI (,'$., !r p(:i j A et's G//f. (..Jell.' . y (l
\
ts&s 6 4<;p , 013') is.v <f ' O.*H (N.*(?wy.6., j'mn,, ep,l,i&' 70, /~F/fyn 0, i
'Y OM3 .Lpl ? pdi>:e. ni ti .71.C y ,
IW .2eo% v /n, ' < L $ l' &r $ Gd .; gay.3, 02l') 2s 'd,-? /'%-i .m.74.$' / $, t
*& A**~ *i, ,LO,r .?.y* 1t. ;~ 97 ,... ,.,c if.l./ g , p '/! f .,,,,./ y .,, ,;
.ci:r.y x,p.,,.ra
> i m ,,a sa , .
~'t. .>.y .4 f..rtwn!?: ,,gr,,,,1y,)l,
; l.. [. 0:<' 5' f..vi. .d'.
0303 A w ./ H ,-;,0 ] C e > % s a. / ;;.,;;y,.. )?,,e g,j',,,.,. , 7,- .
} " )
l }'I~~ Ny h. ?.s.',
. ,;;$f* /,;s." r, .:7!T( > j,\.n pc,,.c +y,) *f g 37,, ,,,; ,
z.<. xn p M % .4// ,4 . u.,: ,. ,,..., w t. .i, g
;( ,
4
<?< ;/.". C~y67/sI .2 3. ,i-/-l 7 . p,:,1,.' 4. p g,9 ; /
/ -
sp.,',9.;. <
,.,..' _ ..,;;,,, .6,.
5,4 , l '
, e ** c9. / '&. .fi
;. 0
! [?f'#u . b,' . %'y eff" ) . **
- trep ,q('
r h'f5 . x 0900 .,'C'ar'J J l;'il/ lf f 4,,'j,:,;,g{..; j,,jg' g *
.\.f I
' l0 ~% . . cw. ! J ..'.st ; ,l ',.,: ,, ' ~ ~
- l )
1: css. e:' ..:.,,, ; , , e. A (Jed ',,
;* [ssi , s ? *./t. *' - U (,J n;. MY! -:;y d, U r'ti '
> ~'
* .;/..
* ;"'e
- j .
,. . g l ~~
%IL ,0 ) 5, *
},' x ,
v
j p- :. n M .:e r. . ,
ID h J ,k ,',' b ') [ _(f_ .g (c,.3f.g.3
, -->m .
_ - . - _ _ _. , . _, . _ s b _.
i
. . . .. =. w rD __ - ,- ; ,.r. g . . _;.p rw fm i c-d 255 y sE8A- /978 e M
[2<w.2-%)$ pyg $ 0 for L<L & fo'.d 4 , wcfjy (g.g,.3gg _.
~B. Iws Eukred p(ode 5 l bAw,1417p$'Oi b t ;97A, ' nSo Mc.uei G S ~ ilta TJ - SfLZq G5-E-H] ~'
i, .;,, it,/. .WQ'.G hr tro7 W ~tal yp .p.jp 7c._ 1
;.,,./ s w M A ,
1% L 6el Co-P A <
%L6 u pp.
' 19 1%ud Fu uccL'b Lm'd IMyte 7
I
'rt Idkr..
- n. r-/A b rd %
2051 &/L - P-iin 5 tf L t L t / k 12 G OI 9tg C-J
'._.. . . It,$o 0-Tataf AB km p '?3tl-5 fxoW StGTh" j;ch/P AU'-IP pop 5 M
/M c.D 89 Co-ti- 38 5 />c.hl d 9tf Jichgel - fe~ sc6r
- B" S
e, . . . ppss I 1;&ad.ludh {
, en sid. sk'j .* -
O, . ...ik rkyn:k. . k
.,.e * -e= *
- e . 4. gamepip.48
- 8 w r - A soy y' * *
'* /5)<C . . . . .. ~~
-h ..
ph - 9 . _. y 4 4 ; j
.M e-d
.24/ /4'S7pp/nb .
[-)le u . . em.g t .y i h -'
l
. -.::-- ~ w r-m u - m --'---v 1' m T *
* " ' - T O 'r- - - + - n.u o.
'N .. Zdb I ?
b-
/0 - if.7 ~(~l{I:. ' /f:E.( .
PXil k2bhy.'),. A 'O .c ! $ , (( N.: f ^ N,). ' N N -'n . . . 'i>r ~ sx,
}.'.A t; G , !*'O mth'sv.ib15.~~t" M(.&,.<,
h , G(jC c !-) 0*/' 'f' JN' i '. 1!.0 5~;.E o4- r}. t. - .
?: sb.s.
.7$u,v.. ' )S'UN.1,.</in r!f G - ~} .. . "I .
/ ** ' " A '
;* /d re .$ ja .:.'tr A- l)l l3'13' jib 20Lto T'~
l '/ / T b 6-b[ fu,. *d <.s/ - i
.i ;
{I fyf 70 2 J. .$,.) io ' d'- hs ? - */ o h' SJn
.. .' 6:rs s.p1;
', r) s/- [O 6 ,
d.upx 4 A. >i, w . ::~ s.
"H " s* [h 1i // 50 W . --.
W
- b. I Qpw .ty.,) .}WN - 6 * /:$v.' Y
- ..--. LI40 St
') I 4 t-
*I '9027 f./ ' f [()G n b.l. ' :. CY, - A' -
- I .> .pl l~. ; rs'-
$co-) Ore J'i:ll e..x',.n .~ r
. m. C.
k W3&' i .
~ < < ri.~
q - 12 . a,.,.) Jg L,,.j/.s- *Is
.g ..,, s e >. .
-p.sh ,
. .. ni. 27, , .lA1/k dir O i).js.,s1 . > > s'r 5 .;
2 cmc' ' p 'i Nw (b,)sn .2 A .Op ad X .JBa.x g.sw.%. . .. - ( l. 9300 b./ .s #'// - 7 T- Cel
'J c~ n .stu..aj'di.w
* '. 033O Q N ., [.,>+v ) SA.&.l:. ff}
l
' ,J .G .bb:M 0- 4
,e.2./.,k.t')r.I.kb.aEY~,ckt 1 -
2&y ln
% g.u, ,e.J:-l :bw.;<./ ;i./e O .') ?5 G f.er-
.. e l 0600
. ,4a ,J n> a. .. ,
I hHiO Gr,v,,vp 9.,cI
- - Zl-;&,f ,I '
wk., I>(H -T~ TB
\ N5.i'a G,.g7 .a;),: ' ') //S ;
l ,
.; os.;r & g 6) w,W/, . -12 p7~- '
~
86 i/. &.i4).s$ /:e/:-7'l/nihk i l l
, /c't-? -Pf b e ', o Yfde- 5/,hi' Ce,b'<',.,5 a>/5..ke_
} e f> f Myy / 5, /4 5 A<,ve - . ,
p y 4'e? Ce-m c</.23cY.-wt
- t 07CS l y'4 r l $3c3 ~t//
e ,
; 0 9 /C M r' C o4- lo , e, c. e .f c o.a - 9fy,t pgo , s.-/j.. .,74 . .
l
~
.6 Cca-6g ,
g.,, j',. , , . ,. a g gg , , yy c,,,/ . 2
& / fu .* */ k. *J d' ty 4 l.w r l- -
, 'Y3 ) $ $ /)' D '< ) (' c ..,,, e a c o., e l' ,_-. k g,} ,,,)f ,/ / .'
- 'h 59S3 C -y4 /p~ f 20 /3 -Sc, :p ,e y-S;.,.
/~ A, Vi i ** c A e s. A. , .i -
;.y 0 ,m. Dz >3 . .Cce,.r: .n <l S ~ /. _ n., c 7; e,,i' f (c. ] g,i..l ; :
{
<< uc c .., o . . c J p. in ., ,, .;
x'f.f!&p,,,,,,,S d ;
Y.N F 31. iS >' ;1<36 pijs }
, ['I -
i _... } e
l,
,-,c - -- m- _ _ - -
, ., , n. ... ,,_
. . _, __3:q l
n - 257 if icoo n.L J .rI, cip u..e.u.. (),),0d. mt i ci o s .-.- o c. , 7-.. . n 3 p__ y t l 9r,, c s m, ior * .x ci . J ' r .-c., o.. . < i,.. n.
.t.w: a., w p , g., .
.a ir>s .~, ., -
. , IV 3e ^'
- d G p j-* j'~r. < . 14 s. 1 ,, v s* 1 1 y J. p ,,.,, ,: ,. a , {
.,y .fsk,
. y r.: ~ t .. , . d. 'j, in r u ~ , u - ,. , . , e ,ca. ,
- id l '
n>i sjas sku y r or m. .
.,,,4. n, yao :. i . , .s .-.s
.j.' x "c 0 r< c. .
. .. wr inw p^zc.,p p - -
o r c c. l , . 2.I y o I5 tv -m M . r - 1 a s a c.
>. , .n ss.. a. . a.sc~, A on., , pu.:.4
.. ,u u-u . i, c
', J, -A '. sv.w..". Q ~A*?-l4
- n. /5.*t.<- s.' ~ C f7 M .tl s.s ;wv4
.) }, .J. p pir c rA.- ..a p - , .'s o L. ..u v... . , --.e .+& '
O ,,:u -r ep .,n . (m i. _, p aa sr J l.'.>q>.ptg'S* ors.n.
, n
+
,o
),. i w s . -
Cb.awd74 ' 4s .bso. . . . TBAdE l . t,.
,g. n/hwEU y,AA ns > A .k.w
...7....
6 .: So
% 'x, n, A .-c.J .
l
,AuM A.n/ l t
\ f
) .
Y (c..] x i;..s V )
. . . ~ ..
4 4
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .__ .1
l , s ,,,. m ...-* 2 m . . - _"y5 --" -- - t' *H.~.C'_D ' U e ' '~.' T ~-~ " r - _ (}-::';e,. (~ ~ i l(-l?'73. c u .... .n /2 I*' b'
/*0 - t' * /23 * ~
b",
?^ .9 % W J ).l.\ sod'f.Yadt ~j *~~-
A Y
. l~en. (- !9*'F. ("'"
\ f( P I6/?(3 c.p<.,E. --
oci'/c T3stoi i tl 7/. d. A u. 2 ~ ; o d '-C#' / NT ~'. d I E
,- l -
- u. _
/j& f W 4
~~J~.J .t.,. z. . t s u..L -
D 4 ,
'"I^ ]*'
. I?13A 7 Ec?4 ppm /o Ir ... '*/*'
! 'I pp . r 9:;ocs ;,, ,,: 5 (1. 2 :- WW . .i
[* M-fos.a' 6 L J ,.M. .f,,4 . .. I ' 2' -
/ r A- /(
i 1 at-l M s h.:t.9 nc 4')A - U I i cose A,oTr k..m !s. b of!-
- ( --
t - c. o n.<. Q, p? Cc.-l':A --' /)#15 7 l , o wt.- %dJ 2.c-pia -
/f!' Et2
} ; ousa bij D. 3 %. Lrrr.w.v:. As. 3<S - -
/StS Z <
, . .i- :
cII3 ELJ ~ Mech '3 --
/S2a 5/-
1 1 : . c., > L.tu i A. c - v' s A + /S30 A
.D ' ,, e>o< D Q CF-VIA(4 -
' /460 13 ~
Y - { L E cn;.. Ok . & s, F .r'sppe.., D., M S Pftd -- M0 Ye , o.= % . '.-c ,-p p A a o on -- tw c, l }}0 C 2C $l.5 w A 0C ~ fill - C'
.l
.\ eps c %.Li 2:.-r'Ed - .
t r>v er i C*0.')
~'
U S) IlI*f M - 1k/0 5
/ v31s HP 0 .19, H F f 221 Ib :d,}3tu..t --
tuo 5.)' o>t1 %.by) AJ2: P I . - 1JJo p O 5<*f > WJ.z ( Q.C -t')(*. , & C - 0 2. 0 - II)/ &'
.s C;;.% % yr) C.:>-( 4. C:' M :- - p,gr S b.
oL M R;lIW A to l' A i. /gge 5
'1 6.W '.Y, r.s .., 0.& tw Cl
'i
. 2.7 ? ./ L l}
edrcO'/cle;sid Y6' .cb , fo.adWo.a xs 4 se um n
', e d .- .24-&c( P.w/ ...- ,a. .g. .. . isf ,l.
,. s ,b .- Mfo/ t s i > - r- u 2. - 1 13, c; t: W.Y' 5: w t
- g y 2
- /' 6 f L' .N Y6.*s Nl { {
- f S//g-l ./ 2 % i7.
- 2. O C'.3 * }&' I V ff pfgff
. ew a.< -. n . g ... ,f ,e,a
,,. j s .u i.
;1
' ... c.M Sk. bd G. f i .
9/Ja 0 Wb
-l Y .,
' C 5'I! Y . _..:: )ij,-
i p i; 6.>.weeJ ltc's n9 .di.:., (i.n c,.,,i, p.; f . ,,, .g,g\
,cfi;;, . .i w a h g d Oc6.. Lr ,2j,J c;y ,,.i nr u. x .c .: pm j 4
. na 7. i .
la
. >; (.!:a. <v < ./ dy .,. . < 6.' )i Cpnp: }l[,, flj f ,. ,, (h, } .. g )l .
- _ ._ 1
', l.,_ . .,-mB _
. _ _., g , _q[q f
\
$.$ t) t 123.1 b'A s t- //[d f# [.
. y .J~f . f)J," )$/ reef h /r% hk .% s5 (n, p.mr 4*'Y p.;.;e /% $.u. ale <I &cu b/es,
'):-CL lY bQ [1 A ~ Derw fi 1? 't/ P'ed,W a ,
ff. ~ $e'cl'es e d occ L .& n .
- a. % %.o fc p .y j jfa r
- IEr w l'f;, ),(:
m!A b<~l 4 ' a
/c$
5'. Y i ii> fr4. -cf f.< .. ,, Y. ;r. . p; - , . ,,, e f.e- J ,, _ f
).; /r 12, 4 ? Kyfitsc ., Gy m ,<f C'.S 6'/?*4a-lb . .
j y L. X.s . - .-s-l &~: . e. Y 'C < *0 p <. pCe e. e lc O,kL f 6! * ~
/J!tt)$ $-// j$cdev .
/5V kicw v rin- JsYit'r, $f. A+
- r!s dend t*
ner.rsai<~ia w % cs s" -
- A
/$.20 Sh f/ro ilC -f //l dd /l3** Ig d( s.tf r p' /)ip A'e r s r>MT
/ Slo 8 t/An o r. % c.'szu is rea
/$60 .ffe t a ter) &nic tc, fe rv - fo.wps ,a / rs.
--. - Mo rfe,yr) s: a u . p. iip
------ 10f AArc uc 7) iN .s s.) ess ,s ab,,, 4e ;p ;
-- - I ?]o Closen CF u Alt a- / de-o ry c.c a< g l
/ !>v Cw> ca 00 v A n- Ste m o . ~ .i n i <> A s is c Ih/0 lusled l'.A. Grpi / t'.% .w - rattA*c o dk.<'s h'd L/W<e).
I L -- 1530 .S(hu&J At t> / A - S tcpe r.) Ad t'- st$ . l Ib30 / <//f a' sfdin/ 70 /f o " ifpo waritr> ressing l
\
- - ~ -
16)/ ontem en<, n 9 - {
- - - - ~ ~ ~ - - IbYf S 77MR-D 1)c - P I(3 k 14 9 5!??An-n bH-P IR ** lh c q En d .a $ d'+4 - .
[h*f D o3 C"O . fl l ' L) 3
- A C U / .5 f C u t O ff +) */l Cl 0 // U f t
**l 00.T T HAI) BLED /T o'.l ! }
U Af5 8 e-c_ / 10 0 370/'?ra Ac /> iA ez<v/ /C # Ad
./hr 5/iyte-o .itt. /- :li ? --
l13e su c n c 5*~ \ EN Tc Y2co hTD SfAtrev fic t t A czo~<t J A 0 Y$ - A053~ f Si,q,ocyn> Sc< /}ted $l/#/' - Iful* Alto .51 es*/r,o a e ,/ / ** /'2 4 , Nd' 'A
~
9/3<! OT16 h' oA A'cifc mc/ .%Wcs .
- -- 9/J/ S////rp .7*r ,*'- /6' 1
S% i ~ 2r(b ,1*>- /]dfc sJ t3- /ff & yy { -
/I(.'Prdm<*/s z w oNu co /2 c- v Sc .3 <~ Y s * < < c as a '" .,
.frypy fcisc r, '/]ctt/cs///su'n 727M, Din ir /1['*#' l--
Yk4 /ll </c.r... < '..h< A2t!! Si7hws AC f- /0
- 9/) 7 l ']-
- ,. g, , _
- . _ .= .w.-- -
=. = m--- --- -- :--- . -
% c-. y -
20J i! N 10 -ii 7C' l,,
\1 /t'0S N)j i
ma. bkAb M, y'9.I/lZlE 6 mM5 Aum. n? Cf oG irem c,ay 't +1.!,v. .s. s/a s d:n cs,'-i' *:& ~ I d
~
( L m 'fuTW. 'sc+i? ni. ~'i> 4 tel b)IS C dtn Y6 fU l'N'I5'*.%'h
!. .; owce, oiu 'X.mnic. ; :#anf.~ tir42^f: .
rw;>..,9, ,,,, s c"',op. . /t'%
- os30.r&"'Aii:. :~//&a.k tkAsyo.:: .nN 4:r~' s H &~'/ T"Y ..
0,0-Xmapi.d-(a1.1i<d. JA - @ tG. sets c~,7+e:oo3 -nrA(/J , exp.yna': u 2My 'TE -
/W /5' '
v ais &paiow-ri.-+ a%te%k. .~ !59 Pb l' L centd< Adra-t!->:3MA Q( ous 4dA..<26f-iA ID. .- 16%
\
osa sp,.pi!Acf'-/A.udZh. Ib'W I7" %)' a s m ; d w 9s ' 3 4 , l'c w A.
- CA!A% SI?7 "N M - f5 s an g,> .Jshr Gba ~/-SPE o'YDA ! 't- th ds, .,
1M A'l' - i la; oin gh wk.:: p ci r.c h.w s:. m iu-7e-L L .
'M G'-
i .i .- pw at se
. c clt hz-wk,. f k -+. J.6,ffo k 'M k k
6 i.,7.6/ :p3-&&' o s 4 . 4 m ,. p a .e a, in g a u isp. - i.; a< !bnw'. .- w y
,). a ,w.u,w-u.w n m- _
na l e A/...r.-d wi.e:..M. i a .mac.kyep'ak
?!?I SC 4
oris .f,.,.. d e, A sc: /-l-k,s.
- i .
' # PISl l e rs../,.t.,/ A riv., ..
} $0e'/, <f OIN N' l19l &
17.-yirist<.. 3 nw feiam w swr -ec,wae.m /s AM MH ad
.i Oro c aos.m(., M C o m atned .
i yg'e c c t D C #p w L L 6$.sscD . k~' '; l li 09,$' As/M VMr .7 D/ga. fri:c' bim P cc:' . I J /th w w e /05Fccrrd). lt l cfW .57&@ DC -I'- /A N AI AhWE ./ SM#c G - ena 3 n:,9 f e t e - f -i A .. i f on amatu tx -f- i 6 E ma,-na 79.3.3 .m $) AIK -P- tE .. i .
,,o , ec,at o .23,- tr:-s cye fleer - .- ;
#o STAC F J R, M 9 w- M @ C. eta 4 .. .
Hf mn 6? s u kca bruce.
'y;[bfs j0%@ [tl D (f)
)l '* . --
'<'e,,*')po w skia re e-156
.6lbff@ Ce ffb tel equTt' ,< t(,hh Qc f-id
...- ! (
b' . %n co?- te mm ne. 1 I a
.QW t 3Tw& t mnea fh H i34 t
/
_.i 1 i 1
\
- L:- - =a _
, _,., _.,,, ,, g u
- 25) 1.
/O-//- 77
. .,z ny' n.y ty'oS Sna-D Cw - /'-n=- --
,, de,s.j. :n & ji/0G STC$LD $1 hh%' b/)CAhthC~ /(p /- 7f .L;L
- k. utp p. t, D *P kwr' slowno us
- tin / Tj4: / YAY $ 0A0 ~?" l 0 i(;6 sro D co- P- l B f.
.w ni-An' 15D i.'0 ~'
, -gg , Sf. Qeauad.r'nff<;.,tskk ELJ M b,b *u. wda Y
1540 i97 Pitt- S A6 6 A b.%,f n #7pgl * '
.-V-nM M lb?I GO' M'P-! B,!C dEFfaf CM-P-1F n.6 WAJ po P ta
%, sp Ib Phud M B G< d a k.suic<.
%.gg ,, o'mAaC
,, ,k-7g-sL aos n r-km/5f- /AS%L
'UJ %gAA?/ su,y# * ..
pow atw acp sua E S. g ato btJ PC P sua . . ,i gp t, sri's. StiA ci ec-P- I A,2A l - aun h 3 pp
- W ec-?- ta, pa , spy b .6AhJ, in y a .y
- Y . ,<;l a' , sr A A cy~- J 71pf Mif XC-P-1A, ?A .?
~
9131 Skt' Sc-a - V' BC-P- /A, Fn .
~~
paw sted tec-P-1, .28 pt9l % (Ec-P- iB PB y! i i Al A /&lujakts A Me 294 OJL fn
~~
popo. r4~ l n h.,, W
-[:
/ f 1 bl
~ -t i W J Sgn({ g , N
.p
(: ucE s. ca ms i
. t 1 5
.W l
Y (Lo f-it) j'
.~
P L. s , i
). , ,
-- - -.-==_ . ng-, r r n.
r- -"e # - ~~~' w -^;_.. .
~ ~
. ff '
/ 3r 3 ?$('k /h,ye, // ) ' .2N. -c!lv.f. !/ 476Q % j Y A' i ').' l'M2 5_' - 0 7
/50*fs* T,rnW':'b 4'
},
t Fe300ahm.. de.d'r - 0~ O h fl&VO$.. ' 'Wff*A *7'"' A M . MA
- w % i .' 01., Ga, 'l d J.3% - - t'F4 0 t' n
)'
+ ?/0 b'
. 7L.,Se
\
', 7er) h < J LA '
~ <. .d. S!!.' s7e 'h
- ,2?]o Cm d7d' ynr ,h ah xA':o%.$ AD. . o1" Rg'-
~l Ai3 / , i:i i -V t/?7 ./l.by I N l'.'n*L-JI]~Nl.'"**'Mf:w"ed7'5'
;a @ghnCl efll0 s;,,'fl< /d li,:[m-l'
.smsW'lC6% 97 z. t- A V 1l coqo f' s ) g' ' h Eag f_, *
2 o)1.s"~ A;
,f' l,
C0'/)] d'N :5Ar fn i ec' 4 $~' '8 </ ' a . s70s . S'< - V '
-i ggsyg: M c , &] filIV,M / D G f f M 'e cnds i-M S. _
. .: . o 2 of op>7.i/ '6" yn.Adr SW
;- ?
. ogOS' ')7
. e $vkkj>-wn . - /s37 M
'r >i ca;29 A3c-8g'g/)f h e-d . s'd31 d-
& /8.,
( -) 02is J ~ & ,i i g ~10- 2 -- / '//
~'
.s l
0500 /[. //co 03/6 A c2 A . l l'4; I O35o //f-V- /3] d /7'l A/8 . //5 '? M-CMl Off-vI- /0A. kl
- V~l } HS d A' os 3 2 .ond/- J o .L/A' oN- /rghed', in o . . '- l a 5 3 3 Or.-y' -d ::'3/5 'iN.3 snd hs f.'n,-4 // h S^'% J' '30 bis
' 'O 5'fo S $~~ 0 Q$j~/,/0 55 $~f 6 /+ 2. Y~ loo'lo luO l" 6'$y'N O 3 6 't G I' V* t' 63rg g g & ^ f j .2 Q L m _,
u tu tu. l o voy- facsp 4 mo V I
) O 'l 2 r R /M / 4') D &gSm Ek /:'? 3rl 0437 G, c) ,5
/: <* * ./., '
p.ric c *
-'3 f' /4 clti twe.<A,ly
.' C/u,$'t. ou OS*A 9 AD
/
T S*
..it ' 5 3 0 /5^
' 1 %no 86- ll -l ~ krF A. /3v2 o g</o T g f c - t '- / a d . hs/ m]!
- s C6*Y33f ~ $f :7P Asn esi DE/Q W ~ A.IO h b $l./9 hD Yl,/ J.*1$ .5 l L} : ornO t -
uo i&
*; OCA) .s'./dt O V-/r.4,//7k9 At5*L V -t/, ,$. . t8 5e , ).
3F n[{,! #~/S,f,y -j "'o f! v1 - a ~-
y _ - - . _ _ - - . . -, _ , _ _ _ _ - - - - g sg
}.
,.o . w m .- L ; ; _ _ _ _
__ _ .,, . ; \
'[ -
l 26s I
, h7 * * 'l ?.'O k* e s. o
.,,.I fll~
,,,,,u g I
.,, i5rG gr. k,. y d~' d 6' fn .-x lp,,,,p*g
.s ., . . s7n .u .x.J, ,o 'r., e .e f
-l
- iJ.n 70 . <7ts s*: .. . J w g..,; S..A4 y/<,., ,.,,, ,;) *
,<& f ,A/ S z:),f,)
, .c7so f ~
ow<Aal7' s7y db /8xo . icier , '
>, & dCf. s TH' qed./ SiL,.M/' - '
, ~ 1 m a- k r p . n is- P4 w./ ,% ni,c,z,,aA
, 6E c 67 nie e A c's'9,gs:c. .xA .
7
. . m r~ t.&~..~ / Asc r ,/ x <.p . m -
i . 'fN r
.-576e Q .k<* J ,C k, 0 nas .L ./d'S,
- . ..i' .,/3 'n,) ,s,N
$ 2fXC87~
e-)s 2- g:/ i nro c i A ,. , yisn -- p s n
;_) . . . . . . . /s37 D./ Os-a- ya
,Avyes , . /s37 &S>~/.8/c
< % ,,,.vse/ ;f~ ./44/ / Td /y s s-PA 4 . ..
( )' / /0 t') C 4/c .G e G. 9'-u'- s/,C
' w/.
". j ,/f o o
'[p?
pt.-ft:As r)eo .2 3 c3 - g - 7 do^ 2C-V-1 1 fA'% J7A S* ds- F- % '
. . _ g t, J ///*
c%~ s 'e .sn . /:/y.,/%,~.d3'
~
gw ., . , ,ys ? S :tess <rs j u - V- 2 //S'D r2da-~ l'd e,7 s4 /t.-> w / /C & y a.5 l Ol}-V- p le //o o .,s ;%-d~,/ ./s' ? 3 ,#c s AL,,,~- ; M no v..s,tec,-/,f/rtosec/2.,-,- nuu ,sr,.a,-r~s p.ia o .. \ iu o . .
. T, 4 IL80 1 IksIc 0,# q.,em Is 5% _
I
~....~ , .
Lunb k $ gz{o, f pg p if30
/3/7 l* . [m *)[k~ .
.Skcbd
- p. s ; e, 8.s' e f%f'/%)O 0 . .
/sn .j., s x ,,,. is n FAA .
v'm'll & , /.1Yo
.usao irrw (% uus . .
/w8 ::rf.,.-/ / se-P .4c s. > NA. .s l hs; s t .s./ 4d.a /u -?rb. . a s- N J.4 -
/.srs- .5 6c 4) s x-p-> c -
m hpd >3fl .5farr7"k* ,fC-f-/A j~ (~ 'ko t4 % PPin (20fcntl I4 3o e<7c. f A nt /%PO +V
~
( hv c_. J!~so ,,/f's c ,t%w M
." ,/;<'.) x' .
' m ,. -
. ,,---{, -
s -)
~ ,,
,.---~--x--~~-.;-_..
--m ; m .;~.~;;--l C ~rT % ~ - :3y -
- 21) N.M) m
. (-. , l61ItjY '
0-
/r/ bs,l$f' J /r Io-13 v3
//ce /fede e/r"/<s.3/,,&'~' C~AC > -s &E~ C/76 am hs-G' '
.\. /53.,2 OjsveAC/-/i'M'~d V*5 if//30 d. ., ,,/ ' Mf 7' d,,,, , ' /%y9 .- To sk i X // r e -
l ~ W'
/$ /A- Gk.al'
///o J1 7~ 5P'u v-O -V- -/,54'{$i $ ,$/?d
% f Q'f D '.
/9 e o /// J f 6., .s 4-85'35 tJ T a
- J,4 /CSo al.r c s-/ t'A '/d G*-s'.~n '>^
a >93o ' )* /3 c. 8oeanr As sa I~ /* F A,a 5 , > % b $ $r h.*03 ' M MhhnH 0$ i ;! W/o;;C.~er+d8G$KMky "Eh9 > O$ S r cn2 Orw6y/y %y C ! &:sG &,M A C W U W W 6"E Wcon E k-}; fffJ Xu n . J 26 7
,.,,c/ A A/S ,' c+o t o y'tl h
l
./ to o u r .5- n - 4 p.,s c. L 4./ft*S. - cov- 0 A coa c.Lv
'* I9As & M.~. 6,7<es c./. 6. ift'3
/pss/o.ra 5 /~r. D, pas c4 6 /f t3- - + SG .
(~% ) coo < L j d /9ff L / % f,,,oasao,. c/>Cif/'S .- , iro ..<.s ~ s ,,,,, a c m . .
-w,
*' )
; /7/3 G r % fyg.>., on c. h 9 A /. 5 - -
/eX,Y A., ) s.r & o /L o,-.] ee.e.a-ss .//.A'd l
on o.nc TSt. i
/rst TeC.~k/s
> . r ..
s...r n r. w q ,,,s e s. o it ts. m as)
> Jo.V&Sc:,,7;.. /3 ,[ji, h,,,s.3;Gr.y17%r 70y a:a T.,i.'
l !&&rJt'si,. /fJsyyn J , n-u-or af \ rtoo ' AUg.[7p_/.gL T .sq./>L.S 4-22p reE7;ieX 02v.L.T ], a.ra {
. pio t c,e/J x e.v-i ,... . /, ,,, n y am w_j? C ,.'
\
\
piif Cay A.ralL f //,aa7 ivur ,7&/c 7 ni e, e, s, < Li i 2/fo G /*p,t><-l NA - l' /C-L ar no c. ,. s~. / <,,e ,a.s -}~ A , pa s e,- e.a ax .
&joQt-h&Wl'dd *1 :, ,m ~.i. (, ]
[Ls/ / I'-s/ /?.,a,, e iA/C . mn $'
;. /sv c~ss c. ,,,,. ., .. rss os a ad i --DRo ca.Q
"'Myd'-mL e ,bnec.,,/j r'* p.sy o m G J.I.'
o w c_j_I^ l
. u equ Rc j
o5n Cf
, .'f m < 0 ,,k b
'8 , ', ~~l:- -
lI A o?sc 7-y ! G}' 4 Y{. .. - ) .$p [ . . . . . . . _ . . _ . _ . . . ~ - _ _ _ _ . . , i
P
' 4
.,.. y g
.a __ __ ...._r_._ , _ . . . .
.d Y
{t a n V 1 g
- - w/
~ ' - ' - - - - - -
d - DATET 107D778 REACTOR"COOLA!( LEAKAGE TEST - TIME: 11:16:21 SP 2301-301 a U" '> . . . . . _ _ . . . . . _ = NOTE: IF OPERATOR ACTION DECREASES RCS VOLUME THE D1TA ENTRY FOR TMT ACTio 1 MUST BE f1EGAT( u o 5
-- ,~
--DEStRED TtITERVAL11=8 HOURS) n1 l
1 Et!TER THE lillTI AL REACTOR COOLANT _. . _ . DRAIN
. _ . _ _ . .TANK LEVEL FR74 PATCH PA!lEL DVM#64_
. _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _.__ /
(-) EtlTER THE FINAL REACTOR C00LN4T DRAIN TANK LEVEL FR71 PATCH PAtlEL DVM#64 ;
.3.59 .
~
{ un t.ii uPERATOR CAUSED ~ CHANGES TO'THE' RCDT FR24 DS 4 (2301-3D1) ' j j ) I J 0 ENTER OPER-\ TOR CAUSED C'IAtlGES FR24 DS 4 (2301-3D1) I I U '- ' ' Q" ENTER IDElHIFIED LEAKAGE FROM DS 3 (2301-3D1) (GPri)
-1.08 '
--EffTER-PRirt\RY TO'-SECO.lDARY 0TSG 'RJ3E LEAK '(GRi) n, 0 Tir4E TCA THA TCG THB TAVE PRZR LVI. f.*JTK LVL RCDT LVL O" (F) (IN) (IN) (VOLT)
(F) (F) (F) (F) 11:16:50: 575.070 586.404 577.398 537.742 501.004 229. C3 75.973 3.520 o, u. 12716T50:-- 571;141--583.' EG -571.313 533.201 577.100 231.04'. 73. E2 - '3.500 -- O - 4.m. + e,5c _eaa - [c _,
} hrMikOSS LEAT, RATE (<30 GR4): -7.2293 GP!4 w e .g.~ .
p m.# - 1.2845 GR4 ( ${J70Th~LlDEt!TIFIED RCS LEAK RATE (<10 GR4):
- iM"sj.-d' -
p:.. . -3.5137 GRi
, g.;NE.T UNIDENTIFIED LEAK RATE (<1 GP:1):
..i.OPER5 - , TOR _: bf' .,
9N . /D [3 7[ . . . _ - h EO$ _
~ ~l l h m 4Mrgs_t;- m._ . - _- _ . .- _ _ . .
g ,, ,, Ns%~ ,. ._ - . - -. . . ..
F 1
'} '
. _.- m e ,$, , ,
_ , _ .,. . . y . _
, .- .g .
i s ,.. . .i avD d 3 s g, -130s O kA sf$E* 6 yf5J pyv
%.U J L% $~0).. Qy u Q g tcnp5cw.
- 6. 1 ti t e c % .' G s' s c o si~ o , T@ M c} Si'i, t 6, ri ut P 0 s P., n,rw N31 J i
T, A Sr. Ik ru , , ,,, L,,,. t m , ,., L,l,,w t. l RgAr en< lo' 9' I o ,T ;;<t1 i W.t 5 3'v i f *S' n NZ 3 L sa a n . +.. l ce .f ki1 %%. t Lpir. evs 'C 'c /)s g & )$ih.kgst/,) uEhns 0 2 P$
- r. J:J n-w~ J G. gen l MOSS ' O g.c,.. E C A v H A /S -
,w da . Ay cx2 .5M. tJ C H
- Pi A ces 3 (A t64 4 ja.< l L. 9,15 '
e,ozo 'N w vD n {M~ Skr w bo)GS h.! $ 2 % fW5 A 1. Y U D 5 ?' k
. . _ . . cc 4 % C.l.n < A C n-r, @)t3
. . . _ odo U a) n 'Lc e) M eie < '[a*st.)'.tocA % =- .~L ~ % ).
, _ , , , , .91o WnQ L M(.L.q vA M*SA d "O
%, >, s kQr ec e.e.,, f ,/l,4' . oui Si b % % i$<~k A Ns'
. .. omb T~k.t& SQ.
. .; -.. MW GJaQRocWtLTMN.t.hUlTo.-.Q
// 9.T T42j -
cM I.'4df /c 3 % . suut g n o.% LM
-or se( c1%RGM jf-%%2 .. _
j t 6 4*/1'I/X M3s k1 n, L U Lo - Q ..w.,L :c. S Q -
- f. .. . . . . . . . c h;C. ten.:1. i p 4 jy, L . ._
W .75A' o 31 0 0n y . U S. P. N el- wI hise S 4 W< v 5en cc l's) L* -l CU.) M-I}}