ML20236Y266

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC 980616 RAI on Proposed Conversion to Improved Tech Specs Section 3.1,3.2,3.5,3.9 & 4.0.Suppl to Ltr Will Be Provided at Later Date
ML20236Y266
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 08/05/1998
From: Warren C
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20236Y268 List:
References
WO-98-0078, WO-98-78, NUDOCS 9808120037
Download: ML20236Y266 (8)


Text

4 il l

I udh lI I dII i b li I ll l

.a ciay c. warren Vice President & Chief Operating Officer NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION AUG 0 51998 WO 98-0078 U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:

Document Control Desk Mail Station PI-137 Washington, D. C.

20555

Reference:

1) Letter dated June 16, 1998, from K.

M.

Thomas, NRC to

0. L. Paynard, WCNOC
2) Letter dated June 17, 1998, from K.

M.

Thomas, NRC to O. L. Maynard, WCNOC

3) Letter ET 97-0050, dated May 15,
1997, from R. A. Muench to USNRC

Subject:

Docket No.

50-482:

Response to Request for Additional Information on the Proposed Conversion to the Improved Standard Technical Specifications, Section 3.1, 3.2, 3.5, 3.9 and 4.0 Gentlemen.

W;lf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) r equ.n, t ed a n Oc.w. W+ nt to t he Wolf Creek Generating Star'on (WCGS) Unit. I facility operatiig liense

'NTT'-

42) by incorporating enanges to the WCGS Technical Specific 3tfens (1S) as provided in Reference 3.

The NRC staff r equest ed a adi t i.,n. il i n fo rma t. ico regarding bection 3.1, "8e&ctivity Cent rol Systems" and Ecct cn 3.2, "Poner Di s t rit ut ion Systems," of the proposed TS change

  • in rwferenc-.

The FRC staff roguented additicnal inf ormat J on regarding Set.t ion.:.. b, "Er:elg.ncy Core Ccolang Systems," Sectior.

3. 9,

" Refueling Ope r.: t w nc. " ard 4.U.

" Des:qn Features" of the propcsed TS changes in Reference 1.

The regeest?d incinmation is provided in the Attachments and Enclosure to this letter.

A l n-included are additjonal changes needed for Fection 3.1, Secticn 1.2,

%:: t. i cn 3.5, Section 3.9 and Section 4.0 as identified by WCNOC.

This letter and Enclosure are not a supplement to Reference 2 and have not been reviewed by the Pla n+: Safety Review Committee or Nuclear Setety Peview Committee. A supplement to Reference 3 will be provided at a later date.

If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact me at (316) 364-8831, extension 4485, or Mr. Michael J. Angus, at extension 4077.

t Very truly ' curs, 9908120037 990005 PDR ADOCK 050 4y2 f,

P C1 C. Warren Attachments Enclosure

!.h CCW/rir I

~

l cc:

W.

D.

Johnson (NRC), w/a E. W. Merschoff (NRC), w/a J.

F.

Ringwald (NRC), w/a K. M. Thomas (NRC), w/a

[

PO. Box 411/ Burlington, KG 66839 / Phone: (316) 364 8831

(

i An Equal Opportunny Employer M'F/HC/ VET A

STATE OF KANSAS.

)

)

ss i

' COtmlTY OF COFFEY

)

Clay C. Warren,-of lawful age, being first duly sworn upon oath says that he

- is Chief Operating Officer.of Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation; that he has read the foregoing document and knows the content thereof; that he has executed that same for and on behalf of said Corporation with full power and authority to do so;. and that, the facts therein stated are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

By k

j Clayi Warren Chie

.erating Officer SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before me this day of UGu [, 1998.

nw.E. GLi.

Notary Fablic Expiration Date 12f 09 1999 MARY E. GIFFORD Notary Public State of Kansas

,My Appt. Expires (R.l09l19%

L, i.

I L=-

_._____ t

___a

Attachm:nt 1 to WO 98-0078 Page 1 of 5 JLS CONVERSION TO IMPROVED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CTS 3/4.1 - REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS ITS 3.1 - REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND LICENSEE INITIATED ADDITIONAL CHANGES l

l l

l l

I

1 Att chm:nt 1 to WO 98-0078

- Page 2 of 5 INDEX OF ADDITIONALINFORMATION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION APPLICABILITY ENCLOSED NUMBER 3.1.G-1 DC, CP, WC, CA YES 3.1-1 WC, CA YES 3.1-2 DC,CP NA 3.1-3 DC, CP, WC, CA YES 3.1-4 DC,CP NA 3.1 -5 CP NA 3.1-6 DC,CP NA 3.1-7 DC,CP NA 3.1-8 DC,CP NA 3.1-9 DC NA 3.1-10 DC,CP NA 3.1 DC,CP NA 3.1-12 DC,CP NA 3.1-13 DC, CP, WC, CA YES 3.1-14 WC NA 3.1-15 DC, CP, WC, CA YES 3.1-16 DC, CP, WC, CA YES 3.1-17 CP NA 3.1-18 CP NA 1

3.1-19 WC, CA YES 3.1-20 DC,CP NA 3.1-21 DC,CP NA 3.1-22 DC NA 3.1-23 WC YES 3.1-24 DC, CP, WC, CA YES

'3.1-25 DC, CP, WC, CA YES 3.1-26 CP NA 3.1-27 DC, CP, WC, CA YES 3.1-28 DC, CP, WC, CA YES CA 3.1-001 WC, CA YES CA 3.1-003 CA NA CA 3.1-004 CA NA l

CP 3.1-ED CP NA CP 3.1-002 CP NA CP 3.1-003 CP NA DC ALL-001 (3.1 changes only)

DC NA DC ALL-002 (3.1 changes only)

DC NA DC 3.1-ED DC NA DC 3.1-001 DC,CP NA l

l L

-.____________________________C

Attrchm:nt 1 to WO 98-0078 Pegs 3 of 5 INDEX OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (cont.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION APPLICABILITY ENCLOSED NUMBER TR 3.1-001 DC, CP, WC, CA YES TR 3.1-003 DC, CP, WC, CA YES TR 3.1-004 DC, CP, WC, CA YES TR 3.1-005 DC, CP, WC, CA YES TR 3.1-006 DC, CP, WC, CA YES WC 3.1-ED WC YES 1

~

l I

l l

l l

u. _

I

~

I l

Attachm:nt 1 to WO 98-0078 Paga 4 of 5 i

JOINT LICENSING SUBCOMMITTEE METHODOLOGY FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONALINFORMATION i

The following methodology is followed for submitting additional information:

l l

1. Each licensee is submitting a separate response for each section.
2. If an RAI does not apply to a licensee (i.e., does not actually impact the information that defines the technical specification change for that licensee), "NA" has been enteied in the index column labeled " ENCLOSED" and no information is provided in the response for that licensee.
3. If a hcensee initiated chaage does not apply, "NA" has been entered in the index column labeled " ENCLOSED" and no information is provided in the response for that licensee.
4. The common portions of the " Additional Information Cover Sheets" are identical, except for brackets, where applicable (using the same methodology used in enclosures 3A,3B, 4,6A and 6B of the conversion subrnittals). The list of attached pages will vary to match the licensee specific conversion submittals. A licensee's FLOG response may not address all applicable plants if there is insufficient similarity in the plant specific responses to justify their inclusion in each submittal. In those cases, the response will be prefaced with a heading such as PLANT SPECIFIC DISCUSSION.
5. Changes are indicated using the redline / strikeout tool of Wordperfect or by using a hand markup that indicates insertions and deletions. If the area being revised is not clear, the affected portion of the page is circled. The markup techniques vary as necessary, based on the specifics of the area being changed and the complexity of the changes, to provide the clearest possible indication of the changes.
6. A marginal note (the Additional Information Number from the index) is added in the right margin of each page being changed, adjacent to the area being changed, to identify the source of each change.
7. Some changes are not applicable to one licensee but still require changes to the Tables provided in Enclosures 3A,3B,4,6A, and 6B of the originallicense amendment request to reflect the changes being made by one or more of the other licensees. These changes are not included in the additional information for the licensee to which the change does not apply, as the changes are only for consistency, do not technically affect the request for that licensee, and are being provided in the additional information being provided by the licensees for which the change is applicable. The complete set of changes for the license amendment request will be provided in a licensing amendment request supplement to be provided later.

Att chm:nt 1 to WO 98-0078 Pcgs 5 of 5 JOINT LICENSING SUBCOMMITTEE METHODOLOGY FOR PROVIDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION l

(continued) l l

8.

The item numbers are formatted as follows:

[ Source][lTS Section]-[nnn)

Source = Q - NRC Question CA-AmerenUE DC-PG&E i

WC - WCNOC CP - TU Electric TR - Traveler ITS Section = The ITS section associated with the item (e.g.,3.3). If all sections are potentially impacted by a broad change or set of changes, "ALL" is used for the section number.

i nnn = a three digit sequential number or ED (ED indicates editorial correction with no l

impact on meaning) l

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COVER SHEET l

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NO: O 3.1.G-1 APPLICABILITY: DC, CP, WC, CA REQUEST:

ITS 3.1.X Bases General l

There have been a number of instances that the specific changes to the STS Bases are j

not properly identified with redline or strikeout marks.

l Comment: Perform an audit of all STS Bases markups and identify instances where additions and/or deletions of Bases were not properly identified in the original submittal.

FLOG RESPONSE: The submitted ITS Bases markups for Section 3.1 have been compared l

to the STS Bases. Some differences that were identified were in accordance with the markup methodologies (e.g., deletion of brackets and reviewer's notes). Most of the differences were editorialin nature anj would not have affected the review. Examples of editorial changes are:

1)

Capitalizing a letter with only a " redline" but not striking out the lower case letter that it replaced.

l 2)

Changing a verb from singular to plural by adding an "s" without

" redlining" the "s".

)

3)

Deleting instead of striking-out the A, B, C,.. etc. following a specification title (e.g., SR3.6.6A.7).

4)

Changing a bracketed reference (in the reference section) with only a " redline" for the new reference but failing to include the strike-out of the old reference.

5)

In some instances the brackets were retained (and struck-out) but the unchanged text within the brackets was not redlined.

j 6)

Not redlining a title of a bracketed section. The methodology calls l

for the section title to be redlined when an entire section was bracketed.

7)

Additional text not contained in the STS Bases was added to the ITS Bases by the lead FLOG member during the development of the submittal. Once it was determined to not be applicable, the text was then struck-out and remains in the ITS Bases mark-up.

Differences of the above editorial nature will not be provided as attachments to this response. The pages requiring changes that are more than editorial and are not consistent with the markup methodology are attached.

ATTACHED PAGES:

Encl.5B B 3.1-1, B 3.1-14, B 3.1-15, B 3.1-20, B 3.1-38, STS B 3.1-45 i

.