ML20236V743

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Potential Fy 1988 Gramm-Rudman Reduction within Res,Per E Beckjord 871103 Memo.Support of Design Certification for Std Plant Designs Should Continue W/O Delay
ML20236V743
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/01/1987
From: Rubenstein L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Schwink W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20236V745 List:
References
NUDOCS 8712070043
Download: ML20236V743 (3)


Text

-f if ie.

a g ggg o

UNITED STATES 8-I,,e

. NUCLE' R REGULATORY COMMISSION A

-l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 I

k

%....+ #

DEC 11987 MEMORANDUM FOR: Walter S. Schwink, Chief Generic Activities Integration Section Inspection, Licensing, and Research Integration Branch, PMAS

'FROM:

Lester S. Rubenstein, Director Standardization and Non-Power

(

Reactor. Project' Directorate Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, s

V and Special Projects, NRR

SUBJECT:

. COMMENTS REGARDING RES - PROPOSED GRAMM-RUDMAN BUDGET CUTS I

You requested comments on E. Beckjord's November 3, 1987 memo concerning potential FY1988 Gramm-Rudman reductions within RES. Of major concern is the

-reduction in funds "available to support development of the rulemaking and Reg Guides for' implementing the Severe Accident Policy Statement (SAPS) (pages 13 and 14)." For a savings of less than $300,000 (exact amount unclear), RES proposes to delay development-of this guidance by at least'l year. Such a delay is. incompatible with the schedules for the Design Certification hearings for the GE, W, and CE standard plant designs, which are expected to begin the Design Certification process in mid-1990. 'We believe that such a delay is

(

[

inconsistent with the priorities set'by the Commission with regard to l-standardization, as reflected in the strategic or 5 years plans.

If such a delay to this program becomes necessary, then an approach that would be less time consuming (and therefore, less costly), yet resolve the need for appropriate guidance for the three standard designs, is in order. One 1

acceptable alternative can be found in R. W. Houston's November 19, 1987 memorandum to B. M. Morris (attached) which proposes the staff establish formal interim guidance for the standard designs until the final rules and Regulatory Guides are approved by the Commission. Such interim guidance in conjunction with approved Licensing Review Bases would be applied to the three LWR standard designs currently in-house while the final rules and final Regulatory Guides (upon issuance) would be applied to the advanced reactor designs which are still in the conceptual stage.

8712070043 871201 PDR ORO NRRD PDR

'h CONTACT:

T. Kenyon NRR/PDSNP h

Ext. 28206 s

O

7 a,.

~m

.y

.- J,

ty e

c

.q.

  • 9-4

. g' s i 4

'm Jf

?

December.1. 1987~

-3 j

p a

7.v. 7 s

j '

o r

.R-i 4 ;

.i

.q i

f t

l g

a y

j In.' summary,fsupport of Design. Certification'for standard plant designs should..

.8

' continue. without delay.?JIssuancesofl interim guidance:will. minimize the impact; j

"of this worksto RES's budget, sincefit precludes;the issuance'of Regulatory Guides Lor: NUREGs regardingt implementatiori of SAP. requirements' forLLWR standard L j

l plant designs.

In addition, establishment,of such, interim guidance wil.1 help; crystallize the staff's position'regarding the final? rule and fina1' Regulatory!

j b J, j

"". c E.

Guides regarding'.this matter.

d h

a t o '/

<-a

- original signed by-d Lester S. Rubenstein, Director-Standardization and'Non-Power 9

Reactor Project Directorate.

j Division of Reactor Projects III,-IV,-

V and Special Projects, NRR-'

+.

Enclosure:

> Ascstated i.

' DISTRIBUTION:,

1 AG8MPeh0Mjk

.NRC PDR.-

y,

.PDSNP. Reading LRubenstein-V:

ETKenyon DCrutchfield 1_~ y~

t FMiraglia:

RWHouston:<

.y

+

l H

I PDJff PDSN[(,

TMeh ifc~w.

LRubenstein 112h /87

-12// /87 1

i li2

. 3 i

  • f

,.,[

._____..__..._____m.

v=h,, *, '

,^

s

+,

gis

.o.

w

,J ;&?

17 y,f 2c J

.l:g;r" 3..

In suninary; support of Design. Certification for! standard plant designs should E

?. continue without delay.

Issuance;of interim guidance will minimize the impact-lf

.'of.this' work ~.to RES's budget, since'it' precludes the issuance'of Regulatory

o..

~ ' Guides' or, NUREGs regarding implementation of SAP ' requirements for' LWR standard.

l plant' designs.

In addition, establishment of.such interim. guidance will' help'.

crystallize the staff's! position regarding the final rule and final; Regulatory Guides regardingithis: matter.:

o

,a

- {.[

k ~"

Lester S. Rubenstein, Director-Standardization and Non-Power.

f.

Reactor. Project Directorate.

Division of. Reactor Projects III, IV,:

V and Special Projects, NRR'

Enclosure:

As. stated 1

,'t q

t

'f

.; ').

U:

i-I 1

'l I

'9,.-

i 4

~. ) '

.a