ML20236R840

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Reload Safety Evaluation,Beaver Valley Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Cycle 7, Documenting Evaluation of Cycle 7 Reload Design,Including Affects of 10% Steam Generator Tube Plugging,Upflow Conversion & Thimble Plug Removal
ML20236R840
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 11/12/1987
From: Sieber J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
Shared Package
ML20236R843 List:
References
NUDOCS 8711240058
Download: ML20236R840 (2)


Text

,

y

.w pp h,

t.

t

',~pg Telephone (412) 393-6000 Nuclear Group

$n$p$* port. PA 15077-0004 '

0 November 12, 1987

j.

U.: S. l Nuclear Regulatory. Commission iAttn: cDocument Control Desk.

LWashington, DC--20555

Reference:

. Beaver Valley Power Station,' Unit No. 1 H

Docket No'.

50-334, License No. DPR-66 Cycle ~7 Reload Safety Evaluation Report

. Gentlemen:

-Enclosed are ten-(10) copies of the Beaver Valley Power Station,

Unit No.. 1 Cycle 7-Reload Safety Evaluation Report (RSER).

This report Edocuments an evaluation of the Cycle 7 reload design-including

the affects of :10%. Steam Generator-Tube Plugging, Upflow Conversion

..and. Thimble ~ Plug Removal.

Compared to the Cycle 6 reload fuel (Region

'8 ). the following design differences have been incorporated into the Cycle 7-reload fuel (Region 9):

'1)I Fuel pellet. stack holddown ' springs exert a 4G axial force

instead of a.6G axial force.

.2); Fuel pellets'have chamfered edges.

3)

Integrated Fuel ~-Burnable Absorber (IFBA) rods are used in lieu of Wet: Annular Burnable Absorbers-(WABA).

4) ' IFBAL: fuel-rods-contain a

lower. Helium backfill pressure compared to non-IFBA fuel rods to offset the effects of the Helium gas release'from the IFBA coating during irradiation.

z5): s Reload fuel has 6-inch axial blankets of natural uranium pellets that-are of. the same design as the enriched pellets except<that these pellets are not dished.

t Duquesne Light Company has performed a detailed review of the Cycle' 7 -RSER -including a

review of the core characteristics to determine those parameters affecting the postulated accidents de' scribed-in the UFSAR..

The consequences of those incidents described in the UFSAR which could potentially be affected by the l

reload core characteristics were reanalyzed, and we have verified that..the. reanalyses were performed in accordance with the NRC approved. methodology described in WCAP-9273-A, " Westinghouse Reload Safety Evaluation Methodology".

The affects of the reload on the design 4 basis and postulated incidents analyzed in the UFSAR were i

accommodated within the conservatism of the initial assumptions and do not. exceed any previously acceptable safety limits.

l l

I 8711.240058 871112 y4 lg DR ADOCK'O

h[h, o

h

'::Benv;r VallGy Pow 3r Stntion, Unit No.

k.

1 Dockit'No. 50-334, Lic n23 No. DPR-66 J

Cycle 17 Reload Safety Evaluation Report Page-2 LNo Technical Specification Char.ges are required as a result of

'theLcycle'7 reload design or the RSER.

The NRC approved dropped-rod methodology used for previous cycle design evaluations' was also used for the Cycle 7 design evaluation and1 confirmed that-the DNB design basis is met for all dropped-rod

. events initiated from full' power.

Therefore, no restrictions on rod

Leontrol, either manual rod control or restricted rod insertion limits when in ' automatic rod control above 90% power are required for Cycle 17 ' operation.

The-reload. core design will be ' verified by performing the standard Westinghouse reload core startup physics tests.

The results of the following startup tests will be submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1.3:

1.

Control rod drive tests and rod drop time measurements.

2.

Critical boron concentration measurements.

3.

-Control: rod bank worth measurements.

a

'4.

Moderator temperature coefficient measurements.

~

5.

Startup.. power distribution measurements using the 1

incore flux mapping system.

.The Beaver Valley Onsite Safety Committee (OSC) and the Duquesne 1'

Light -company. Offsite Review Committee (ORC) have reviewed this RSER

.and determined that the Cycle 7 reload core design will not adversely affect the' safety of the plant and does not involve an unreviewed i

safety question.

Very truly yours, a

Lr D. Sieber Vice President, Nuclear

cc:

Mr. F. I. Young, Sr. Resident Inspector (Unit 1)

Mr. W. T. Russell,-NRO Region I Administrator Mr. P. Tam,: Project Manager

>