ML20236K312
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _
f s.,
~'
./
?"EMO ROUTE SLIP S** ** * *at ta'*-
F" C&ncurrt For action,
, a.
Form AEC-95 (Rev. May 14,1947) AECM 0240 Note and return.
For signature.
For Informa ttin.
i To (N me and un )
HWTIALS REMARKS In response to your request for a preliminary G. Way e err Chi ~e evaluation of the potential release limits for art Ag ements and Expore.s B
ch the evaporator at the Maxey Flats Burial Site, TO (Name and unit)
InfTIALS REMARKS the following. analysis.was performed.
THRU:
E. Cogti Leader An evaluation of the atmospheric dispersion was.
un RIS/RAB carried out by the Meteorological Section of the To (Name and unit)
WWTIALS REMARKS Site Analysis Branch and was based on Lexington ec:
J. Kastner H. Denton data.
The annual average X/Q at 0.5 miles NNE un W. Gammill E. Markee (nearest residence) was calculated to be l
FROM (Name and unit)
REMARKS
-5 3
10 sec/m.
At a distance of 200 meters (fenced G. Hulman R. Kornasiewicz ared the X/Q is 10 The estimated permissible P. Lohaus stack release rates based on MPC levels for PHONE E DATE tritium, plutonium-239, and strontium-90 are
.)..
,_USE OTHER SIDE,FOR AD0tTIONaL REMARKS apo, gggg o. 443 44g r
_w
.e,.
.... ~.,.
(
<a l
~
MEMO ROUTE SLIP S*e me about this.
For concurre. S For action.
.' l
? Form AEC-95 (Rev. May 14.1947) AECM 0240 Note and return.
For signature.
For Information.
To (Name and unit)
IMITIALS REMARKS enclosed.
DAu These values should be used only on an interim basis until a thorough meteorological analysis To (Name and unit)
HUTIALS REMARKS of the site can be performed.
The request for the site analysis should come under a separate su
.,W. S
.4 u.
TAR 'to the Site - Analysis Branch.
To (Name and unit)
IMITIALS -,
REMARKS -
A 9708070075 870724 PDR FDIA l
MINTON87-235 PDR FRoM (Name and unit)
REMARKS
_--7-._
-._..~.____.__._..-_._.A:_i.~..
J. S. Bland
'RIS/RAB,
~
f
\\
y
, g v.
c.am M mn l
.-7955.
- 6 /19 /75
- a. :_ e.m m;.;.m:_ u._
.a.a.ua.us'E"5a $$5 foa ^oo'T*" at"^Rns.m_ a m m_;.mmtatspaws:aa_.M
t
~~
.i Estimated Permissible Stadi Release Rates
~
Release Rate ( Ci/sec) = MPC (pCi/mt) x 1 x 10 (mt/m )
X/Q (sec/m3)
Isotope MFC Release Rate (pCi/mt)
(pCi/sec)
Nearest Residence Exclusion Boundary 4
3 11-3 2 x 10~
2 x 10 2 x 10
~1 S R-90 3 x 10 3
0.3 P U-23v 6 x 10 }4 6 x 10 6 x 10
-3
~0 b
[A 6
6 l
l s
l 6A.K.AA.
,,. / -
c JUN 2 6 '1975 i
Mr. C. Leslie Dawson
~ 2he Secretary for Human Resources Commomaalth of Kentucky Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Dear Hr. Dawsca I have baan asked to reply.to your May 13, 1975, letter to Robert C.
Seamans requesting EEDA t=ahnie4 and financial assistance in geologic and hydrologic studies at the UUC0 Maxey Flats cocmercial radioactive wasta disposal sita.
We are, of course, very interestad in all studies related to disposal.
of radioactive vastes by near-surface land burial, and did provida an EEDA representative at ena usating of your Environmental ;tudy Design Connittoa.
~
With regard to your specific roguest, va will continua to provide technical easistance to the Cot.aaonwealth of Kantucky, upon request, in area of mutus1 interest. Ikr.: ver, ve cr.nnot at this tima offsr financial assfacance for a number of roances:
1.
Some further evaluation 'oy EEDA of the need for all parts of the study'is warranted. In a letter dated February 21,'1975, to Charles M. Hardin of your Department of IIuman Easources, C. H..
Dely of EP.DA raicad sono questions regarding the report entitled
Six-Month Study of Eadiatice Concentrations and Transport Hochauisas at the Hazay Flats Area of Plening County, Kentucky."
Since this report is the basis for proposing further studies, our reservations st1U. need to be addressed. Also, in an April 11, 1975, letter to Eardin, Daly cow.enced on the extent of the proposed stucy and the priorities of the various eles:ents of the study. Your May 13, 1975, submittal reficcts no change from the study outline previously reviassed. Perhaps another anoting is in order to discua S these points and the gunstion of financial assistance trou n2ra.
S f'*
e eew. -
n e,
a
b.
Mr. C. Leslie Daunon
~2-JUN 2 s 1975 2.
We understand that you cent sinilar requests to other Federal agencias, such as EPA, USC$ and ZiRC. We would require so:aa coordination with those other agencies regarding their interest in financial support of portions of the study before deciding if EEDA could provida financial support. Perhaps the best way to prococo this coordination would os to have all appropriate Federal agencica represented at the cecting propoced in it.en 2.
above.
I am sura that any of the intercated agencies would be willins to provide meeting space in Washington, D.C.. if you would coordinate the cacting.
3.
tie understand that the Nuclear Regulatory Comisalon recently
~ couplated an independent reviou of the Nasey Flats situation and is to submit a report to your Cov.arnor about the end of June 197$.
l Obviously, any finsi consideration of rederal support will nacd to take into account NRC's conclusions.
I would succest enat any rasting you arranca should allow ths various interested
]
Fadarol agencies time to reviou the liEC report.
j i
l've asked 2ir. Daly to continue working with your agency concernion this matter
- and he will coordlnete ERDA luvolves. ant. We will look j
forward to hearing froan you regarding the proposed meeting.
Sincerely,
)
/s/
Jamse L. Liver::nn j
Assintant Ai::inintrator for Environtcent and Safety i
becs D. Turner, OIR J. Ihher, BER G. Dc3uchannnne, USCS W. Voigt Pitt W. Ectr, NRC J. Dieckhoner, EPA File Code:
2.7.2
]
Ref: 10:T-973-75
. Wr:03 Cd W12:DD 10E A/D V:2:DIR AES CHDaly:no AFFerge EVMcCarry ETittman 6/ /75 6/ /75 6/ /75 6/ /75 6/ /75
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _