ML20236K261
| ML20236K261 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Duane Arnold |
| Issue date: | 07/01/1998 |
| From: | Long W NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Marchi M WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORP. |
| References | |
| TAC-MA1557, NUDOCS 9807090247 | |
| Download: ML20236K261 (5) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _. -- ___ _ -__
- . i p.
- c l
July 1, 1998
-l
-I Mr. M. L. Marchi-Site Vice' President k Kewaunee Piant LWisconsin Public Service Corporation
!P.O. Box 19002 Green Bay, WI 54307-9002' L
SUBJECT:
' REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, KEWAUNEE AMENDMENT J APPLICATION PA152 (TAC NO. MA1557 )
Dear Mr. Marchi:
By application dated April 15,1998, WPSC requested an amendment to the KNPP Technical a
Specifications to reflect changes associated with the new fuel design.: The staff has determined that additionalinformation is needed to cornplete its review. A Request for Additional Information is enclosed.
Your prompt response will expedite our review. If you have any questions regarding this.
matter, please contact me at (301) 415-3026" t
' Original-signed by:
William O.. Long, Sr. Project Manager Project Directorate lll-3
]
' Division of Reactor Projects lil/IV -
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
d Docket No. 50-331
Enclosure:
- As stated j
cc w/ encl: See next page' l
DISTRIBUTION:
[
Docket File hbfh[
)) fp D
Reading t
' DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\KEWAUNEE\\PKG_ FACT.RAI OFFICE PD33:PM E
PD33:LA E
PD33:D E
NAME-WLong -V EBamhill PW RBellamyP DATE 7 / / /98 L,/F)/98
/ /98 7 / / /98 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY l
r y
50'%*Ks,'aoy,
^
r.d J
July 1, 1998 I
1 Mr. M, L. Marchi Site Vice President - Kewaunee Plant Wisconsin Public Service Corporation P.O. Box 19002 '
Green Bay, WI 54307-9002 l~
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, KEWAUNEE AMENDMENT L
APPLICATION PA152 (TAC NO. MA1557 )
)
Dear Mr. Marchi:
L By application dated Apri: 15,1998, WPSC requested an amendment to the KNPP Technical Specifications to reflect changes associated with the new fuel design. The staff has determined l
that additional information is needed to complete its review. A Request for Additional information is enclosed.
Your prompt response will expedite our review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (301) 415-3026.
l Original signed by:
William O. Long, Sr. Project Manager L
Project Directorate ill-3 Division of Reactor Projects lil/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Rsgulation J
Docket No. 50-331 L
l
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION-3 l
Docket File i
PUBLIC PDS 3 Reading SSun l
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\KEWAUNEE\\PKG_ FACT.RAI OFFICE - PD33:PM E
PD33:LA E
PD33:D E
I L
NAME WLong V EBarnhill Pfr
~7'f-1/F I
DATE 7 / / /98 L,/F)/98
/ /9P,
Q,,,
=8 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 1-l l
]
.c f*c at:e%
k UNITED STATES
,- (A
'l f
- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
WASHINGTON, D.C. 2006S.4001 July 1, 1998
' Mr. M. L. Marchi i
Site Vice President - Kewaunee Plant l
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation l
P.O. Box 19002
)
Green Bay, WI 54307-9002
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, KEWAUNEE AMENDMENT l
APPLICATION PA152 (TAC NO. MA1557 )
i
Dear Mr. Narchi:
I By application dated April 15,1998, WPSC requested an amendment to the KNPP Technical l
Specifications to reflect changes associated with the new fuel design. The staff has determined that additionalinformation is needed to complete its review. A Request for Additional information is enclosed.
j
. Your prompt response will axpedite our review. If you have any questions regarding thie
)
matter, please contact me at (301) 415-3026.
Sincerely, l
r l
I William O. Long, Sr. Project nager
)
Project Directorate lil-3 j
Division of Reactor Projects Ill/IV j
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation J
Dot.ket'No. 50-331 Endosure: As stated cc w/enci: See next page 4
7 t
.2-M. L Marchi Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant l
- cc:
Foley & Lardner ATTN: Bradley D. Jackson One South Pinckney Street L
P.O; Box.1497 -
Madison, WI 53701-1407 Chairman Town of Carlton Route 1 Kewaanee,WI 54210 Harold Reckelberg, Chairman Kewaunee County Board Kewaunee County. Courthouse
- Kewaunee, WI 54216 Attorney General
'114 East, State Capitol Madison, WI' 53702 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident inspectors Office Route #1, Box 999 Xewaunee, WI 54216-9511 l
Regional Administrator-Region til U.S. Nuclear Ragulatery Commission 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, IL 60532-4531 James D. Loock, Chief Enginear Public Service Commission of Wisconsin P. O. Box 7854 MadisonAVI 53707-7854 l
l L
L Ct...
j
g+
lk REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE SAFETY ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT
{
, THE TS CHANGES PROPOSED BY WPSC FOR KNPP (TAC NOS: MA1557)
- 1.
As a result of the findings of the Maine Yankee Lessons Learned Task Force, the staff has taken a position that licensees must verify conformance to any l
, conditions and limitations identified in the safety evaluation reports (SERs) that L
approved the analytical methodologies used in safety analyses supporting l
licensing applications. Accordingly, you are requested to confirm comformance to the conditions and limitations, if any, specified in the SERs for the methodologies used for the LOCA and non-LOCA transients analysis supporting y
the TS change 8.
2.
The non-LOCA analysis was performed for a full core design of SPC heavy fuel (Attachment 5, Page 2.) However, it appears (Attachment 4, Page 2) that the proposed Cycle 23 core is a mixed core with both SPC heavy fuel and SPC standard fuel. Please clarify the types of fuel used in the core. If a mixed core is proposed as a transition core for operation, discuss the mixed core penalty on t
the DNBR calculations and the methods used for assessment. Present the results showing that the ssfety DNB limits are not violated for the applicable i
trans!ents.
3.'
The discussions of the LOCA analyses does not identify the specific breaks that were analyzed and the limiting breaks for both small break and large break l"
LOCA cases.. Provide this information and explain you rationale for concluding L
that the limiting cases were identified and analyzed.
4.
The application does not include information for the steam generator tube l
rupture (SGTR) event. Explain why tne SGTR event was not considered in the l
application.
5.
For the locked rotor event, the application states that the percentage of fuel rods experiencing DNB depends on the reload calculation, however, no number was provided (Attachment 5, Page 5.) Please provide information to show that the acceptance criteria in SRP 15.3.3 for the locked rotor event are met.
Specifically, acceptance criterion ll.2 requires that "Any fuel damage calculated t
- to occur must be of sufficiently limited extent that the core will remain in place and intact with no loss of core cooling capability," and acceptance criterion l1.3 W
requires that ".Any activity release must be such that the calculated doses at the
. site bcundary are a small fraction of the 10 CFR Part 100 guidelines."
x
! (i 1
L t
jI i
.s.
- - - _ - _ - _ _. - _ - - - - - -.