|
---|
Category:GRANTS OF EXEMPTION FROM & EXTENSION TO NRC REQUIREME
MONTHYEARML20236K2491987-07-27027 July 1987 Exemption from Fire Protection Requirements of App R of 10CFR50,Subsection Iii.J Requiring That Min of 8 H Battery Power Be Provided in Areas Needed for Operation of Safe Shutdown Equipment ML20212A9131986-12-0404 December 1986 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Subsection Iii.G Re Fire Doors for 24 Fire Areas,Charging Pump Cubicles,Control Room,Main Steam Valve Room & Fire Dampers ML20128C8521985-04-25025 April 1985 Exemption from Schedule for 1985 Emergency Preparedness Exercise.Sept of Each Yr Designated for Scheduling of Future Exercises ML20058F4021982-06-29029 June 1982 Notice of Granting Relief from ASME Code,Section XI Re Inservice Testing Requirements for Pumps & Valves 1987-07-27
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20212M2711999-09-30030 September 1999 Order Approving Transfer of Licenses DPR-66 & NPF-73 from Dlc to Pennsylvania Power Co & Approving Conforming Amends ML20212E5361999-09-24024 September 1999 Memorandum & Order.* Grants Local 29 Waiver of Time Limits for Filing Comments,In View of Claim of Newly Available Info & Refers Comments Re Firstenergy Ability to Run Beaver Valley NPP Safely.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990924 ML20212G0661999-09-23023 September 1999 Answer of Duquesne Light Co Opposing Petition to Waive Time Limits & Suppl Comments of Local 29 Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.* Request That Commission Deny Request for Leave to File Untimely Comments.With Certificate of Svc ML20212C5611999-09-21021 September 1999 Answer of Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Co & PPC in Opposition to Petition to Waive Time Limits & Suppl Comments of Local 29 Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.* with Certificate of Svc ML20212C5751999-09-20020 September 1999 Affidavit of Td Martin on Beaver Valley Staffing.* Affidavit of Td Martin Re Nuclear Staffing Analysis Update of Staffing Benchmarking Analysis Completed on 980227 for Beaver Valley Power Station ML20212B3361999-09-16016 September 1999 Petition to Waive Time Limits in 10CFR2.1305 & Supplemental Comments on Local 29,Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.* Local 29 Does Not Believe FENOC Can Safely Operate Facility If Positions Eliminated.With Certificate of Svc L-99-122, Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-10736, Svc Level I,Ii & III Protective Coatings Applied to Npps1999-07-28028 July 1999 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-10736, Svc Level I,Ii & III Protective Coatings Applied to Npps ML20210C6511999-07-23023 July 1999 Memorandum & Order.* Orders That Petition to Intervene Filed by Local 29,IBEW Denied.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990723 L-99-106, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Industry Codes & Standards1999-06-29029 June 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Industry Codes & Standards ML20196F1911999-06-23023 June 1999 Reply of Local 29,Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.* Requests That Commission Deny Answers of Dl & Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Co & Grant Local 29 Petition to Intervene as of Right.With Certificate of Svc ML20195H5141999-06-16016 June 1999 Answer of Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Co & Pennsylvania Power Co in Opposition to Petition for Leave to Intervene of Local 29,Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.* Requests That Commission Deny Petition.With Certificate of Svc ML20195J5581999-06-16016 June 1999 Answer of Duquesne Light Co to Petition to Intervene of Local 29,International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. Commission Requested to Deny Local 29 Petition to Intervene. with Certificate of Svc ML20195H3881999-06-0303 June 1999 Petition to Intervene of Local 29,Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers in Matter of Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Co,Pennsylvania Power Co & Duquense Light Co.With Certificate of Svc L-98-067, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Industry Codes & Stds1998-04-0303 April 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Industry Codes & Stds ML20198P9311997-11-0707 November 1997 Comments of American Municipal Power-Ohio,Inc.NRC Should Require Allegheny Power Sys,Inc to Affirm That Capco Antitrust License Conditions Will Be Followed ML20149E3241997-07-0808 July 1997 Comment on Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59.Efforts of Nuclear Energy Inst Supported by Util ML20141A7171997-06-18018 June 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems, Published in Fr on 970520. Insufficient Justification Exists to Warrant Requested Actions ML20138E0341997-04-23023 April 1997 Comment Supporting Revs to General Statement of Policy & Procedure for Enforcement Actions.Util Does Not Understand How Investigation Rept Is to Be Edited in Order to Protect Privacy of Individual ML20136E7311997-03-0303 March 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication, Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Testing Systems in Inservice Inspection Programs ML20134L3401997-01-22022 January 1997 Resolution 96-R-85, Resolution Supporting Merger of Centerior Energy Corp & Ohio Edison Under New Holding Co Called Firstenergy ML20134N2011996-11-11011 November 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rev 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.160 Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maint at Npps ML20134N2811996-11-11011 November 1996 Comment Supporting Draft Supplement 3 to NUREG 0654/FEMA REP 1 ML20128M5851996-10-0404 October 1996 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication, Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations ML20116G9151996-08-0202 August 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to Fitness-For-Duty Program Requirements ML20112H9241996-06-10010 June 1996 Suppl to Comment 4 Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Reporting Reliability & Availability Info for Risk- Significant Sys & Equipment ML20097G8991996-02-12012 February 1996 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Which Would Amend Emergency Planning Std in 10CFR50.47 ML20095D9351995-12-0707 December 1995 Comment on Proposed GL, Boraflex Degradation in SFP Storage Racks. Util Suggests That Words as Well as Future Projected Be Deleted from Stated Sentence ML20086M8391995-07-11011 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Ltr Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval ML20086L0661995-07-11011 July 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial ML20085M0171995-06-13013 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2, Petition for RM; Procedure for Submission ML20081G9151995-03-15015 March 1995 Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-8012, Instruction Concerning Risks from Occupational Radiation Exposure ML20078A0491995-01-12012 January 1995 Comment on NUREG-1122,rev 1 Re Technical Catalog for Nuclear Power Plant Operators Who Operate PWR Reactors ML20078R3371994-12-0909 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed GL Re Reconsideration of NPP Security Requirements for Internal Threat ML20077F7341994-11-10010 November 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Equipment.Medical Determination Prior to Initial Fitting of Respirators Needed for New Workers Due to Unfamiliar Medical Histories ML20072K3681994-08-0909 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Change for 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to fitness-for-duty Requirements. Util Suggests NRC Retain Current Scope of 10CFR26 as Is ML20070H6791994-07-13013 July 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rulemaking 50-59 Re Virginia Power;Filing of Petition for Rulemaking ML20071N4751993-11-29029 November 1993 Comments on Proposed Rule Re Commission Trial Program to Allow Public Observation of NRC Enforcement Conferences ML20044E2781993-05-13013 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercise from Annual to Biennial ML20105C9481992-09-15015 September 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rev to 1983 Staff Technical Position on Radwaste Classification, Technical Position on Concentration Averaging & Encapsulation ML20099E1871992-07-24024 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 61 Re LLW Shipment Manifest Info & Reporting ML20101T6101992-07-10010 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & SNM ML20055F4251990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Petitioner Request That NRC Change Requirement That Nuclear Power Plant Licensees File Revs to Final FSAR No Less Frequently than Annually ML20206M8071988-11-28028 November 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Random Drug Testing Provision in Fitness for Duty Program.Local 142 Members Can Accept & Work Under Fitness for Duty Program That Contains Only Just Cause Drug Testing Provision ML20195J3381988-11-28028 November 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Random Testing Provision of Fitness for Duty Program.Members of Local 142 at Plant Can Accept & Work Under Fitness for Duty Program That Contains Only Just Cause Drug Testing Provision ML20195J3521988-11-28028 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Local 142 Members Opposed to Proposed Random Drug Testing.Supports Just Cause Drug Testing Provision ML20206F9951988-11-16016 November 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Opposed to Random Drug Testing Provision to Be Included in Program ML20206G0021988-11-16016 November 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Opposed to Random Drug Testing Provision to Be Included in Program ML20206F9761988-11-16016 November 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Opposed to Random Testing Provision to Be Included in Program ML20206F9501988-11-16016 November 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Opposed to Random Drug Testing to Be Included in Program ML20206F7121988-11-16016 November 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Opposed to Random Drug Testing Provision in Program 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ .
7590-01 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of )
.s )
DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY, et al. ) Docket No. 50-334
)
Beaver Valley Power Station, )
Unit No. 1 )
EXEMPTION 1.
Daquesne Light Company, et al. are the holders of Facility Operating License No. DPR-66 which authorizes operation of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1. The license provides, among other things, that Beaver Valley rower Station, Unit No. I be subject to all rules, regulations, and Orders of the Commission now or hemafter in effect. Duquesne Light Company (the licensee) is the authorized oparator of the facility.
The station is a pressurized water reactor at the licensee's site located in Shippingport, Pennsylvania.
II.
On November 19, 1980, the Commission published a revised Section 50.48 and a new Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50 regarding fire protection features of nuclear power plants. The revised Section 50.48 and Appendix R became effective on February 17, 1981.Section III of Appendix R contains 15 subsections, lettered A through 0, each of which specifies requirements for a particular aspect of the fire protection features at a nuclear power plant.
One of these subsections, III.J. is the subject of the licensee's exemption request.
ERS1888!BM$a4 F
Subsection III.J of Appendix R requires that emergency lighting units with at least 8-hour battery power be provided in all areas needed for operation of safe shutdown equipment and in access and egress routes thereto. I III.
The NRC has previously granted several fire-protection exemptions to the licensee. These are dated March 14, 1983, August 30, 1984 and December 4, 1986.
By letters dated January 21, 1986 and October 21, 1986, the licensee l
requested an exemption from the technical requirements of Section III.J of Appendix R to 10 CFR 50, concerning the need for 8-hour battery-powered lighting units in areas having safe shutdown equipment and along access / egress routes. The reason for requiring 8-hour battery powered emergency lighting is to ensure that at ' east minimum lighting is available for the performance of manual actions necessary for safe shutdown after a fire. The licensee requested the exemption to allow the use of:
- 1. Security perimeter lighting for outside yard area access / egress -
routes.
For a control room area fire, the operators are required to follow outdoor pathways to achieve and maintain safe shutdown from outside the control rorm. To provide lighting, the licensee proposed to use security perimeter lighting instead of the required 8-hour battery-powered lighting for 1
the following access / egress routes ~ control room to emergency diesel generator building via the east yard area, control room to the intake structure via the l
l' north yard area and the roof-top area between the safeguard building stairway and service building (feedwater regulating valve room).
1 l
The security perimeter lighting is powered from motor control center MCC-137 (located in the security guard house), which on loss of offsite power, would be supplied from the security diesel generator. This emergency diesel generator has a fuel supply for at least 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The security perimeter lighting circuits are not routed through fire areas where safe )
shutdown equipment or cables are located. The transfer circuits that switch power between the normal source and the security diesel generator are routed through the fire areas TB-1 (turbine building) and NS-1 (normal switchgear).
However, for fire in these two areas, a control room evacuation would not be required. The security diesel generator and transfer circuitry are independent for all other fire areas of Appendix R concern. The staff concludes that the security perimeter lighting system, including its emergency power supply, are independent of fire areas where control room evacuation may be required, and provides lighting capability equivalent to the technical requirements of Section III.J.
- 2. Portable, hand-held lighting units for specific plant-areas.
The licensee has requested approval of the use of portable lights to enhance the permanently installed 8-hour emergency lighting for alternate shutdown, in specified areas, based on field walkdowns: intake structure, turbine deck, primary auxiliary building, service building roof top to feedwater regulating valve room, normal 4-kv switchgear room, AE and DF emergency switchgear rooms and process rack room.
The Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) Handbook (referenced in Generic Letter 85-01) for industry standard lighting guidance accepts the use
.c r
. ~4-of portable lighting to supplement fixed d-c units. The staff concludes that the use of portable hand-held lights to supplement the oemanently installed 8-hour battery-powered units is acceptable.
The operator actions are bands-free activities (access / egress, observe a 1 gauge, etc.), or require one hand (operate switch, etc.), which would facilitate the use of flash lights.
- 3. Two-hour battery-powered emergency lighting in the fire brigade room, l The licensee requested approval of the use of 2-hour battery-powered lighting units in the fire brigade room, which were installed instead of 8-hour battery-powered lighting. The brigade room is located on the turbine deck ,
adjacent to the control room main entrance / exit area. It is used as a staging area for alternate shutdown procedures. In this room the operators are briefed on job assignments, and provided key rings, procedure packets and extra flash lights. The expected time duration at this staging area would be less than 30 minutes. The turbine deck has 8-hour battery-powered lighting units installed for access / egress around the brigade room. - i l
IV.
Accordingly, the Comission has detemined that pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a), the exemption as described in Section III is authorized by-law and will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety and ara consistent with common defense and security, and special circumstances are !
present for the exemptions in that application of the regulation in these particular circumstances is not necessary to achieve the underlying purposes of Appendix P, to 10 CFR Part 50. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the J
.o -
=
. . . - following exemption for the items inentioned in Section III above from the requirements of Section III.J of Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50 concerning the need for 8-hour battery-towered lighting units in areas having safe shutdown equipment and along access / egress routes as follows:
- 1. Security perimeter lighting for outside yard area access / egress routes may be used,
- 2. Portable, hand-held lighting units may be used for plant areas as specified in the licensee's submittal provided the licensee provide the hand-held lights as part of the dedicated supplies required for alternate safe shutdown, and
- 3. Two-hour battery-powered emergency lighting in the fire brigade room may be used.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the granting of the exemption will have no significant impact on the environment U2 FR 27892).
This Exemption is effective upon issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEA RE,ULATORY COMMISSION g&, re ob Division of Reactor P ects I/II Office of Nuclear Reac r Regulations
{
Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 27th day of July 1987.
l i
1 l
l I __ _ _____________._________.____________U
r s
.c ~
g(G Y. July 29, 1987
! ooCKET NO. 50-334 Rules and Procedures Branch
("EMORANDUM FOR: Division of Rules and Records -
Office of Administration '
FROM: Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation suancT: BEAVER VALLEY POWER be.(ION, UNIT NO. 1 One signed original of the Federal Register Notice identified below is enclosed for your transmittal to the Office of the Federal Register for publication. Additional conformed copies ( 5 )of the Notice are enclosed for your use.
Notice of Receipt of Application for Construction Permit (s) and Operating License (s).
Notice of Receipt of Partial Application for Construction Permit (s) and Facility License (s): Time for Submission of Views on Antitrust Matters.
Notice of Cons!deration of issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License.
Notice of Receipt of Application for Facility License (s); Notice of Availability of Applicant's Environmental Report; and Notice of Consideration of lasuance of Facility License (s) and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing.
Notice of Availability of NRC Drait/ Final Environmental Statement.
Notice of Limited Work Authorization.
Notice of Availability of Safety Evaluation Report.
Notice of issuance of Construction Permit (s).
Notice of Issuance of Facility Operating License (s) or A*nendment(s).
Order.
Exemption.
~
Notice of Granting Exemption.
Environmental Assessment.-
N.tice of Preparation of Environmental Assessment.
Other:Planna nnh14ah in tha nart FTmPRAT. REGISIER Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Project Directorate I-4, DRP I/II m
Enclosure:
-s -
' As stated
Contact:
Phone:
gWJ/Qrris or ric E > PDI-4'~ ' ' " ' '
" gig'
.j .
DME> ,,, , , , , ,,, , , , , ,, , , ,,
.wac ronu sie noesoi uncu ouo OFFICIAL RECORD COPY m_