ML20236K074

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of Commonwealth of Ky Environ Study Design Committee 750218-20 Meeting in Frankfort,Ky Re Evaluation of Radioactive Matl Migration at Waste Disposal Site in Maxey Flats,Ky.Agenda & Attendees List Encl
ML20236K074
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/07/1975
From: Kerr G
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20236E585 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-235 NUDOCS 8708060400
Download: ML20236K074 (19)


Text

--_

e.

o.

1 e

m

  • j.

1 UNITED ST ATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '

i W ASHINoToN, D, C. 20555 "

A M

Y 19/5 FILES MEETING OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY DESIGN COMMITTEE FOR MAXEY FLATS, KENTUCKY, WASTE DISPOSAL PACILITY As a result of findings of the Kentucky Department of Human Resources,

~as published in a December 1974 report of a six-month special study at the subject facility, the State convened a meeting of a study design committee I

in Frankfort on February 18-20, 1975. The special study showed that radio-active material may be migrating from the point of burial at the site. One r

of the principal recommendations of the report was to conduct further en-vironmental studies to assess the long range significance of the findings including studies of the geological, hydrological, and climatological characteristics of this oite.

The subject meeting was chaired by Charles Hardin of Kentucky Department For Human Resources (KDHR). A list of attendees is shown in Attachment I.

The agenda for the meeting is shown in Attachment II.

Attachment III is a brief statement of the purpose of the committee, its objectives and items to consider. During the early part of the meeting, one item, source term, was added as an item for consideration. The agenda for the meeting was followed quite closely. Since several of the attendees were only i

vaguely familiar with the site, its history, type of operation and findings of the six month study, most of the first day was designed to give the attendees sufficient background information to understand what studies are now needed.

The second day of the meeting was devoted to a discussion of the types of information needed to assess the long range significance of the potential problem at the site. Hardin stated he-felt everyone agreed that no immediate public health hazard existed which would require emergency action.

Mr. Daly had raised several questions regarding the December 1974 report since he did not receive a copy prior to the meeting. After some discussion, however, he stated he felt the results were sufficient to justify. further investiga-tion and that the studies to be proposed would be useful. As noted previously, it was decided that the seven items to consider as listed in Attachment III, plus information on source term constituted the type of information needed.

There followed an extensive discussion of how this information should be obtained. The following six items were identified as the type of studies whi'ch shEuld be performed:

870B060400 870724 PDR FOIA MINTON87-235 PDR o UTIo4

.(

=

    1. 7 19N 6

fri l

4 Maxey Flats, Kentucky -

I.

Hydro-Geologic Picture (Deep Geology)-

II.

Environmental Biological Pathways (Vegetation, Stream biota, insects, and non domesticated sources of food - squirrels, fish, etc.)

.III.

Agricultural Pathways 3

(Livestock, milk, garden crops)

'I IV.

Definition of Source Term V.

Weathered Zone Study (Approximately the top 10 feet of soil)

SurfaceStudy(Waterrunoff,meteorologicaldata,andsoilstudy VI.

in top one foot)

The first item would be the most expensive since it requires drilling of several test wells of varying depth. The USGS postulated drilling of'five piezometer nests of four. wells each.

Hardin asked each of the official spokesmen (Kerr, Daly, Meyer, DeBuchananne, Bayha) to state which studies they would place in the highest priority, second highest, etc.

There'was unanimous agreement on the two studies to be

.)

given the highest priority and general agreement on the other orders of priority as shown below:

i Priority I.- Deep Geology Study Priority II Surface Study Priority III - Weathered Zone Study Priority IV Definition of Source Term Priority V-Agricultural Pathways Priority VI - Environment,a1 Biological Pathways H

The third day was devoted to discussion of timetables and estimated costs.

It should be noted that the costs are based on 1975 estimates and are "best guesses" rather than detailed cost estimates. They also. contemplate considerable work being done by USGS and not by an outside consultant.

q 1.

Deep Geology Study USGS estimated a 3-year period for drilling of wells, collection of data and developing a model. However, they feel an additional two years would j

be necessary to collect additional data sud refine the model. Some data would.be available from sample analyses as soon as dr*illing starts. This study was estimated to cost $750,000 over the total study period although the major expense would occur in the first year due to the cost of drilling wells. This cost includes equipment for a weather station which is more closely associated with II below.

j 1

.J

i a

Maxey Flats, Kentucky II.

Surface Study This study would require limited gauging equipment, recorders, and shelters and assumes installation of a satisfactory weir in the dam proposed to be built by NECO.

It is estimated to cost $12,000 over a 3-year period. This does not include the costs of the State Radiological Health group which will do some sampling and analyses.

III. Weathered Zone Study An estimate of $50,000 over a two-year period was made for this study.

However, Hardin, Bayha and Zehner planned to meet with University of Kentucky staff during the week of February 24 to discuss this in more detail and the cost estimate may then change.

IV.

Definition of Source Term This study would involve organic, inorganic and radioactivity analyses of samples from each burial pit. The State would absorb the cost of the radioactivity analyses and an estimate of $10,000 over a one-year period was made for the remainder.

V.

Agricultural Pathways These studies are already contemplated in the current EPA studies and no additional costs are contemplated.

VI.

Environmental Biological Pathways This study is projected for a two-year period at a total cost of

$68,000.

Hardin plans to send the study group members a draft of the meeting minutes for review. After correction, he will prepare a presentation to his manage-ment outlining the problem, the study group's recommendations and the cost estimates. He feels the problem at the site is basically a State matter but with national implications. If the State is unable to fund the study adequately, he would approach the Federal agencies for funding only if he feels the agencies would also. benefit irom the study.

It is my opinion that he would approach NRC, ERDA, USGS and EPA for funds.

o e

e 9

m_______.__

4 9

t i

/

(.

Maxey Flats, Kentucky It should be noted that NECO's position during the meeting was that there is no problem and that the studies are unnecessary. Leonard stated he felt a cost benefit analysis of the proposed. studies should be made.

(

l ;-f L' QG G. Wayne Kerr, Chief Agreements and Exports Branch Division of Materials and Fuel Cycle Facility Licensing Attachments:

4 1.

List of Attendees 2.

Agenda 3.

Statement of Purpose s

t' e

my e

ll\\,

4 9

s.

y NAME' AGENCY ADDRESS 6 PHONE g

' Charles lbrdhi' Ky. Department for 275 East hbin Human Resources e)T Frankfort, Ky.

40601 502/564-3700 Cerald H. Daly Chief,Operationsfiralich Washington, D.C.20545 "4'

N " Div+of Waste Management 6-1 transportation-Energy RtSearch 6 Develop.

y' Administration Al-3209 CXXI x.

s V

s 3

G. Wayse Kerr

?

Chief, Agreements 4 Dcports Br.

hashingCon, D. C. 20555 Div. of Materiale, ahd Fuel Cycle 301/492-776?t

'4 Facility Licensing

)

U s S. hbclear R?pu2.atory Comm.

Ja a

1 ihrold H..Zehner I

' Hydrologist,U$S. Geological 502/582-52,41 s,

i Survey Room 572 Federal Bldg.,

' m Louisville, Ky.

(

Hans Claassen U.S. Geolegical Survey Denver,ColoradN Bldg. 25, Denver Federal Ctr.

303/234-2115 1

s r

{

Denver, Colorado 80225 i

David'T, Claru Ky. ')ept. for Human Reco\\

urcev 275 East Main i

Radiation 6 Product Safety Br.

Frankfort, Kentucky 40601

' c, 502/564-3700 e

George'D. DeBuchanpnn b Chief,OhficeofRadiohydroloj;y Reston, Virginia 22082 U. S. Geological Survey 703/860-6976

/ Stop 432 x

l eston, Virginia 22082 R

g

.\\

.n David C. Bayha Geologist 6 Head Water Section

'lexington, Kentucky 40506 Kentucky Geological. Survey 60G/258-8979 307 Mineral Industries Building 120 Graham Avenue, University of Ky.,

s-Art Curtis Kentucky Dept. for Natural Resi dces'. Frankfort, Ky.

6 Tmvironmental Protection

' 502/564-7030 Capital Plaza Tower 6th Floor L.rt Huhtanen Chemist, Ky. Dept. for Human Resources 275'E. Main Street Radiation 4 Product Safety Branch Frankfort, Ky. 40601 s

4 502/564-3700' Richard M. Fry Ky. Dept. for Human Resources Frankfort, Ky.

40601 Asst.' Director, Office of Consumer 502/564-3700 Healt.. Protection 275 E. hhin Street i

Attachment I 1

(

.?

1 l

l

_NAhE AGENCY ADDRESS 6 PHONE Damon W. Harrison Kentucky Science 6 Technology Comm.

Frankfort, Ky. 40601 State Planning Committee 502/564-3450 Room 157, State Capitol Harry Kolde U.S. EPA, R S NEF Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 Radiochemistry 6 Nuclear s

Engineering Facility G. Lewis Meyer Office of Radiation Programs (AW-559) Washington, D.C. 20460 Hydrologist U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 202/755-4863 401 'M' Street, S.W.

Mike H. Roulier Soil. Scientist EPA Solid 6 Hazardous Waste Cincinnati, Ohio.45268 Pe,earch Laboratory 513/684-4487 Naiional Environmental Research Ctr.

Charles F. Eason Nuclear Engineering Co., Inc.

Washington, D.C. 20036 Suite 1000 202/785-4705 1100 - 17th Street, N.W.

1 John A. McCabe U.S. Geological Survey Louisville, Ky. 40202 572 Federal Bldg.

502/582-5241 600 Federal Place Louis A. Krumholz Water Resources Laboratory Louisville, Ky.

40208 University of Louisville 502/636-4280 James H. Leonard Nuclear Engineering Co., Inc.

Louisville, Ky.

40207 P.O. Box 7246 502/491-8300 0

m en e

e

1 AGENDA l

Environmental Study Design Committee Meeting February 18, 19, & 20, 1975 Frankfort, Kentucky Tuesday - February 18 9:00- 9:30 Welcome & Introductions Charles Hardin 9:30-10:00 Charge to Committee Charles Hardin 10:00-10:20 Break 10:20-10:30 History of Site Charles Hardin 10:30-Noon Six Month Environmental Study David Clark l

12:00- 1:00 Lunch 1:00- 2:30 Licensee Environmental Task NEC0 Representative Force Study 2:30- 3:00 EPA in Radioactive Waste Lew Meyer Management (Broad View) 3:00- 3:15 USGS in Radioactive Waste George deBuchananne Management (BroadView) 3:15-3:30 Specific USGS studies at Maxey Bud Zehner 4

Flats 1

3:30- 3:45 Specific EPA studies at Maxey Harry Kolde Flats

'3:45-4:00 KSTC Responsibility as Site Damon Harrison Owner 4:00- 4:30 Discussion Wednesday - February 19 8:30-10:00 Type of Information !!eeded 10:00-Noon Type of Studies Needed 1:00- 3:00 Type of Studies Needed 3:00- 4:30 Priority of Studies Attachment II

.... l I

Thursday - February 20 8:30-10:00 Establishment of Timetables

.00-Noon Cost Estimate of Studies 1

l e

e 0

e 4

0 0

1 I

t 5

D RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY DESIGN COMMITTEE FOR THE KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT FOR HUMAN RESOURCES A.

Purpose of the Committee: To advise the Kentucky Department for Human Resources in the design of an environmental study to determine the long range significance of detected radioactivity in the environment surrounding the radioactive waste disposal facility at Maxey Flats, Kentucky.

B.

Objectives-Ine what type information is needed to properly evaluate icance of tile detected environmental radioactivity, e the kind and type of studies that are needed to obtain iion identified in item 1.

the priorit',es of the studies identified in item 2.

-.isn the timetables to accomplish the studies identified in item 2.

5.

To estimate the cost of each study identified in item 2, and/or phases of each study.

C.

Items to Consider:

1.

Modes of possible migration - air, surface, sub-surface, deep geology 2.

Rate of migration 3.

Geclogy and geochemistry 4.

41ydrology 5.

Meteorology 6.

Dilution factors.

I 7.

Pathways to man r

d tI"\\

,,, s L. %

_ _ - _ -_____ - ___-_- _______:______ a

-7% -+ M, h3

-r h

s

/

~~

D A, r e., M 77 APR 9 A4:W,9 APR.i SAMPL,/J(

/ U r E;E/A t.

/3 4' 5. - /547 c1f5.- /t ) 3 1343- / 6'2 2,

A/ -r s A />1 F W N 4 ~5 An~

it i

~

~~B 5~ ~~ ~ ~ H.r

~

E M/Al s r*o nA q G rha)K Afo.

J

.5

-./O...

3{

Pie Fr. N r/eA FRoN

-r >hk

. s'o

.n Wh D....

..e,

......ad.*

...L..

Thcht..tdh '%RV'o),g....

A549 dt \\ %

~3 70 t

~

R3A 7E2 e tvL r. c i~ R515, m (ltnnt

z. G o...._. -. _... 2 H. co al 9. 9 IW VOLO ME rr1$

R.) 47.

18 YG

'S. 2 6 I d Mc fleh cf Mt.O f/!nm

'm.- -

wnwd qu w3w a. e q w (crmp).___

~ cre y a%

1

....e.

~

6&R$

kHEyrs t 8 no{n ( G~~ ~ ~ f Ci,(yd~~~~

~~~

~ ~ ~ " ~

'~ ~ ~~

~

g4 y-no g - nep7 cw g rgg 6 0g - - tWg - ~ 'np uvAc g

r

i. w nst r es
r. u. o new sms em we so
f. >Q t6tn~ ~ ~ 497 J 34 Fis' Wsi f if E ~~~ i~c6f M4s9 4

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

(-

~t % 8' Aq rv-1

\\.

l OYl l'

h/ NPc R A TO R. W i

1 l

1 AP tv. io 1

2 2..,.. / o o o.-. / / 5'o... _... _. __..

l

/

>f

i W' I

,/..,

.p' I

.... ~

n..

~.

a..

-m..c c

....e

...e

..../

.a

,.e..

.e.

SO

- a O

e.,

a..

w.

.g.a G

ed.e e

00 4

h 6.

N.

a.

6.

g.-

.g..

.y.-

6 sw e a W

4...

w'

..... Ae,(

I 66-g.-

..g 8Gw..

m..i.

.... O m

N e..

6, 672.

12.no.n

-. J.1 A -. 0

.... Le or n

.M' NM6M wm

.e.

a.. g ee.

t 4.

p

... -.. ~

6.. *..

.. Og h.6 N

h.

4 a.e4

. ++

4.es

..e

.a.

e-

.e.

i.e.e

.u.

  • H MM MM

.4 a.

.ae&.

s.

.e

...g..

m.4 a.

W y

.c

..m.->.

3 R.WPN MWW

.h 4

..e...

I n...,

a.

O B.*'..

9.

>..p.

.m.

.w.-_

mo a.,

l

.**...m.'.**=.*.

.-.n AC I'

h I

i g-......._...

._...e

-m

--__m-_ _ _.- - - - -. - _ _

i-i.

g d4 y'lV ]

.<e s q.,'..,..,

ap

-.es p (, f_, j v. c.

n n-p (2 f mI I,

a s N.

5 Ni-3u i

  • ea

- ) ** S,

or-ttA_ o

.).

=-

6. g C u. {,

totu b

2. I'im h\\n

- - -. -. =

W 4 A * (o"?. 4. l* 61:Mb'-.01'h9.~q I Sto *h n 5 ?. - -

  • 2.

~

M41rnl F s t c t< A r G.,.

4. %$.u Mo. < I..R %i I.%.0,14'o M'N0'A I

l

. : 14 4.id Set.b toi MS h d i.... %z*u nv3 6 7,p (mw. A%

e n.cr do t

.( %,-

..D'* A L-

/.f 39 No A ug

/G Fu aer.

DR w'

"~~

o

..< 3o 3.u.

ggq

.c. 2 eo l

)9.. _. _. _. -

T o T b 1.

l.t3 V L

/,d 4 2.c >

6y dh)

% cxc x, A a. ss x #.__, e a s s...... _... o ~. n. _... f. M i o. N (4wq se, Ay

._.6 \\s L -.

,.... t, n 16 *.. 2A KW__'....

2.e u > '"

p. Ca(

(sito q I" 5 s

-e=

9 MD

/.Pfin' AtR

<fx t o

(,2to.ix(M

~

~

~

'[ Td.l _ry

.wc. us v wrgwre_.

~T k r.cM

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

1.oh. n, >-'

,, g do,1

  • tty no._e.-

. e m.

..m.

.. - =.. = '

W.

'.*.h..ma e..

=

AtR

..._ _ _ f

.. _ A O, 4 $.

.3%

. _ _k

  • h... -

. F it. r wrE

.3 \\t.3 i o',._.__.

...#o _

_ d_D. $.S.

4 L _. _..__ A O A -~

..e n.x t< u r c. _ _.._

6 33--

r e -r m.

3,tUte.

. < o. <-1...._..._... n.

r.A m,,e i.mur m---

~ e>. tc q g- ~ -- ~ 7_.

{

<'M4$.

a.* = ti r_.....

.. _... _ _..Ja lp((rtted)

._t.?ct....... h z.< 2 d ____....

_.._ _/!3V./0 t- __

_....d e.

_ _../.d g4m.TISM.....

.__ J,. i.

7

)

. f 1

I i

~.

\\ 6.5'N TO M M ARY

............. ~..~ ~........-...~................

.,n,.., m

.,.. ~ ~ ~ ~..............,~ ~....

12r f.L L

. GhW; K 42f OL

. 6N t3T

2. 2 Cs 0-.

4

-t

~

7 5

{

v y.

6g..

._ c m '+

N Et i_g..-. A..ft.t.L.x

.5' i.10.Ix Aoh. b252edVs's'. 1..H: o. b v A_'._.A. & B2.D,,stub'.

+

..... _.... _.._(i 2. u ci'..

...< 1,o..?, o s;4.22. o

. $ 14.% to~.1....2Ato.ys@_.

<,, s n o".'

. 3. z t iJ..o&

4

@.-._... _..-.M p..

.X.D..... -.. _... W.D

. MD M >

.61 2.

k, o< !

~

i 2 27

2. 3..

36

<4....

.... f. (*

. - = _.

4.'I-to......._ -. Bc

.e. 5oo x$b B.9

?I

'4, eo 33

_.. ~....

~

) 1.

2. 3......

I(k.. V30

..S* S

! $2. 9

e.... _. _.....

0

4. o2S'

..o. 2. 1..... 4 a 0 4 T. _...

6.J f"

. _., o / _i

. 0,.2. 67,..

.4 '.4 t o".h...

. Ob fo" Y....?. ? t Ic".?.......hi

.lD*'......

!.oY.

&. ~). mci?

l k

s F M

/8 t t.X X so' '

l.?to,&x so%

< \\ <to' 7 2.t'c.B x to WD

~

~

<1Ai s

l.1*o.]* e- *

/,f'f o.T x to '

MO

.dN'/2. coo' flO A D

. flb AD

.ll0

,0 4 P S.t*. ccc

_. ~.._...

.. 3e5

. - _. 2 s f

.<.2..

'/2 a

3 2..

I4 2.--

M.

%7 40 k

Id._..

_J l 2..

? 2..

. 2,4 - _ _

... 3 '2

. oc?o

.cott

., o I ?

6, 4l

0. t s ).

.b. lo' '

1, '._..o' 7 2. x f o' 7.' ? * / O' #

Sq oo'#

7

/.

Et

.. (. C

..,_: 1.

J.t..

  1. N

.8..-.

NM_..=.MW W..

T--

.gg. S m.@ w 6 p

g g

6 0

LL_

=,_

h

1. E A - % - m
- mi n. sq,(a. Rw th p

49 4 y t w. po(o.f<M h 9 u.4. p.et-ieA.(no%

4 h

dh 1, E A-EM

  • n E A-98 6eu N f dbb6M i

'9 ben 6At-4.h (._pe d & i. 9 g e b M

.i

' M 90g 3

60 73 g

3 g

[de lu.

. es(wt.

+6 i4c.

.f. /. * <.o D 1 o'.f._

.1..? 10.M 10~ '

A t t'e. bi2+ Ct nn]

'37e) W F tt -rte A r r. _ _ -

.3,ofs. o t =, to{_.. #,74. /,1 x.lo.i._._4.!!N.403.T'__

._3../. 6 :c i o" Y

Td bl_~_

Fi s_T ram 3T. __-

I. 7 *.0, f.e.1 o'. '_ _.

-f c't'A. P. pb s

2 9 o

Aira b,qelhvel4)

~

f"( M t~e Fv4f

.4..?

/

o oi

/Ad Wf 4')

tot h L 1, ( ~*>

A' T6TAL-S ThC% Ab St.39 %.Ok O, d 7

- _ _. -. _.. __/ '. k....... *

'_*/..-.

b.et JA U f A.t t

_.. A a.Q F \\ o ".5

...._ !.*..I N0ff

(% 3 u 8+)

'<lv (q he <,')

.15 "

t. 3

-l 0,

b t'iR p C f t.2-A-TA) -

A. 'l !'t. of v so-+

. [.'.kI..,d 2

[

C0td O

.,7 t o,2 v. t e erv p(4/A

\\,% *, op. t o9..

3. ( *. $.z.<to-'

l'.'1yAd I _. 4,o t-1.3 me:

aa a aco M i: i t_-t re P t L -r R A NT* [0,* fd

_ /, @ 4,o P I o.

. _ _... ! [ *. $.A N D.

To fW. p 01.

6.3 (.

3W....

_.s-:

MW f rhe.e,kTc S

To 4._

......_. N h......_

.___'l 2-5: t v r t< N*TE...

4.11 4 to

~

8

~~

.e w-r n xge..

m 1 M e \\ 2..d l0

.....) f 58 _..._..

.. _.._ /. J.]

1 T o 't h w k

~

l k._.

...-._ _.. o,

27 ToTk$ 4T[e K,)v6' ' $'. 'l 0 I lb 3 9

'

  • Mt 8 C.?< I o
  • 4_..._

4, "<w s

(6 ans)

\\3%,. _..

9_. ~. 5 fi> l.

(

v e,

(

m. g

_eg.

f

.y..r$

e.g._.

e e e

.a.

.ie.e-oe-.e.

u#

t f i.

+

t i,

f " **~ *., 0

............ +............. S...d. M-. M A.s9.. - -. - - -

ln.,.an,.r.,n~w,~w-.................--..~.

l

/y 7(

2., ~2 8 6 A.na o.

2. 2C B. -

s 4

l 1

1 q _5_f 0 * '

1 t.*% $ c 0~l. *.10 ~.{.

4 /a 3 w10' L

t. 2.t_.c.

3,HL I. l. X lO~.. '. _.

-)/O_

N D

. 9.cL*i'}t..oc q

_.,~1,.i.$2d5.1 o I...

-.. 00$e'l* e ooo2.

-~

a, L.._ _.

.4 2,.

/A,r

.. 14-t4. r-.-..

33

/c7

/4. ('.

3< l 47 3 f._ 5_._

. o o 4 (......___....of$

__ _ e,-

d..t (

i e

~ ~

9._.__~. 3. bio'

3. % o~_ '._....b d

.to

.. l. Lno

~

~

1

\\

_._ff./.-b.o,oC% led _.

A D. _..

)/. J)...._._.

..4 I.1i t t. c 3.

_W.Q-.

.. AJ. b..--.-__.m.tdL, =ot>.

~

_ _... /..f c/..t v.. Io.~. 3 N D._ _

el D. _.._.

. o "W6 t. o e o 2..

a

._. I_O o R..-..-. _

= _ _. _

4I 2a, 4 7.......

.....(_7_ __

- V 1...

. 3_.?._r 4....

.... _... c.

.__.c) l l 2.

~

h 6__.

N e

S 0 M 0"".

/. 5( IQ

~

.M OA3o o.M

[

'3 ) t..

3

'i i,

.g

)

FIC.1 i,.DIOACTIVE WASTE DIS;'OSAL FACILITY DIS POS AL TRENCHE S(1-Speilot.L-Selldified Ligvid)

,r i

TEST WELLS i

OFFICE -

.,E

/

n e2E

\\

POND t-J

/

s LOADING DOCK OPEN 13 E

  • G

/

j--

',T R E rlC H

( POND,_

s-el4E e3E

+8

$f n

hh EVAPORATOR l

.4 LlOUl0 STORAGE V/AREHOUSE

. bJL g

(

  • 12E 53

- e/

S-

  • SE.

ellE s '-

L C, I

S, 0L Ot 4,

,/

'OL "DL

=

E g

I

[ "'

(s RESTRICTED AREA J

1

.2

  • 6E

$ 10E e9E TE :

~co

g r.,

'. f. :. :,

-4 8--

\\

Annual Percentage of-tima

' Compass Direction Distance-to-Wind Blowing in Time fraction-icorrenponding to Tnbic V)

Exclusion Fence this direction

  • Ueinhted'Distanct;

-(mcters)

(%)

(meters) l' 0* (due south fro:n 367 3.1 11.38 stack) l i

l 22.5*

321 6.2 19.90 45' 297 6.3 18.71 67.5*

257-5.5 14.14 90*

147.-

3.6 5.29 112.5*

'122 3.6 4.39

'135*

118 3.7 4.37 157.5*'

135 9.s

'12.96

'180*

187 12.1-

,22.63 1

202.5'

'197 13.1 25.81 225*

200' 7.5 15.00 247.5*

226 5.7 12,88 270*

300-5.0 15.00 292.5*

239 6.5 15.54 315*

229 4.4-10'.03 i

-337.5*

266 4.1 10.91 100.0-219.O raatcru r

Mean distance to fence (baced on wind direction) is 219.0 n:cters p

tt

.*' See following page for source of data.

4 I

lr (I'

li

. ?.

o xxxrNGTCN Kr..VTUCV.Y

_49 v w M:so1.i w su n,ges.pcc ; ap:e#.3 -e.v; p3; SURFACE WINO. ROSES LEXthG '..).e, KEN TUCK Y Ja.

Feb March T-prd N. ' 'h-

'ih..i N

lhf

- /,D

//'i k Q(

k

/\\

'h l-

/

/

i 1

}.13y Juno hdy Is u;.

%lp,f_

Y

.;p

,- x

n. /

d/

ry

/

\\

l

/1

/,

/

('

\\

S.,p t.

Oct.

No r.

M.k[/'

D:c.

$-. [ '

b 7 w\\

m

%)a M_.., n!/4.-

/

m Senfe a

im w>

w -

1 l

s.t:.,ev i :

tJeo:ored f rom circornf erc<,co of c.ircio 1

MC 4W Latigth of berb indtectes 10101 nurnber cf hourly 7.y;cr period for i,hich vind bleu frorn the direchen ir direcord eb:aryotica in o Paried of Record:

i co hd.

Jon.19 4 7 - Dec.1953 4

Dcct(n'.>et I G$ 4 t

.. m p.

.s.

.. i t

From Fig. C-1,'at.a mean distance of 219 meters, I

.i UE=1.14x10~3

~

m Q

The mean annual eind speed can also be cotimated usina data frca blu>.

Crass Ficid:

~ Wind Speed.

Annual Fraction of Time T it:c-L'a igh t ed

_(niles/ hour)

Wind in'this Speed Range

_ Spc;ed 0-1 1-2 0.0027 0.0927 2-3

.0151

.0302

~3-4'

.0553

.1974 4-5

.0303

.3232 5-6

.1260

.6300 6-7

.1507

.9042 7-8

.1315

.9205 8-9

.0973

.7704' 9-10

.0932

.8383 1:0-11

.0S03

.8000 11-12

.0507

.5577

'12-13

.0479

.574S 13-14

.0192

.2496 14-15

.0164

.2296 15-16

.0123

.3345 1

16-17 17-JS

.0055

.0935 18-19

.0041

.0739 1

1.0000 7.40 rules /hc 1: eon wind velocity (time-weighted) 10 7.40 nilen/ hour milca/neter = J.19 x 10 E"N

= 7.40 " hour x 6.21 x 10_1,

~

nr

~

Again taking Q for tritium = 2 x 10 pC1/ml

~7 $1 + 1.19 x 3 0 h r "3

E i

2 x 10 mi 9,($ + u

= 2. 0')

(u/Q)

~3

-2 hr n1 y,- 14 10 n

E, 4

q sf 1

i I

- _ _ -