ML20236J912

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Viewgraphs Outlining Recipient Alternative Approach to Resolving Safety Issue B-56 as Discussed W/ Nuclear Util Mgt & Human Resources.Tentative Meeting to Discuss Diesel Maint Program Requested for 870812
ML20236J912
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/29/1987
From: Serkiz A
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
To: Wykoff H
ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE
References
REF-GTECI-B-56, REF-GTECI-EL, TASK-B-56, TASK-OR NUDOCS 8708060331
Download: ML20236J912 (3)


Text

. _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _

JUL 2 9133l Harvey Wyckoff Electric Power Research Institute P. O. Box 10412 Palo Alto, CA 94303

SUBJECT:

DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY CONSIDERATIONS

Dear Mr. Wyckoff:

Thank you for the viewgraphs outlining EPRI's alternative approach to resolving Safety Issue B-56, which you have discussed with NUMARC.

The NRC is developing guidelines for a reliability centered EDG reliability program which include both maintenance and surveillance aspects, and relates these to targets (or goals).

A copy of SAIC's prepared " Diesel Generator Reliability Program Review Guidelines," Revision #3 dated July 17, 1987, is enclosed for your information and use prior to the August 1987 meeting that we ciscussed.

This draft (Revision #3) is considerably different then the 'iworking drafts" which were discussed in late April 1987 and it appears to me that some of EPRI's expressed concerns (i.e., EPRI's viewgraphs) may be based on our early work, or even prior B-56 efforts.

I do not feel that B-56 will (nor should) continue to be a resolution dilemma.

Some of your points are indeed valid, particularly prior emphasis on a high frequency of quick starts.

Thus, I also want to make sure that these emerging B-56 reliability program guidelines relate to real world diesel generator operational considerations and minimize inadvertent damage due to over testing..

Therefore, let us plan a tentative meeting (say August 12, 1987) to discuss further EPRI's proposed approach to a reliability centered diesel maintenance program, including EPRI's proposed means to verify that an acceptable level of reliability (which can be verified) has been met.

This latter aspect is expected to be difficult to formulate and implement and should be brought forth now.

We have included such elements in our reliability program guidelines.

Therefore, please obtain the necessary NUMARC approvals, and identify meeting participants so that I can schedule a suitable room and notify appropriate NRC staff.

I believe that participation of INP0 staff would enhance the usefulness of this meeting.

Sincerely yours, 6

870B060331 870729 Serkiz',' Senior Task Manager A. W.

PDR GTECI GELB-56 4

PDR 7

Reactor and Plant Safety Issues Branch

/

Division of Reactor and Plant Systems, RES

Enclosures:

1. EPRI Viewgraphs
2. SAIC Draft Report cc:

See next page OFC :DRPS:RPSiB :O PS:RPSIB. RPS:RPSIB NAME : ASerkiz:j f :PNor n

KKn 1 DATE :07/ /87
07/ /87
07/ /87 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

sVL 2 91987 l

s

- g-cc w/ enclosures 1 & 2:

J. M. McGarry III, 8CP&R R. Wyrick, INP0 M. Childers, NUGSB0 cc w/ enclosure 1:

T. Speis W. Minners A. Thadani F. Rosa A. Rubin PDR 1

i 1

l l

I i

8

,t 7

$N l

Anm.,

t

, ri O

-d

  • 7 :*;

1 1

JUL 2 91987 DISTRIBUTION

=

RES CIRC RES.CHRON I

ifDCSSNL-007j ?

l DPRS C/F-i RPSIB R/F A. Serkiz i

P. Norian l

K. Kniel l

4 I

1 l

l l

.I l

i i

l

)

{

i l

\\

l l

l 1

i h

4 l

f

-, zn5.?

~ $. sA,$,

+

-I

. i I

i s

L_____.__

_