ML20236F714

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 8 to License NPF-36
ML20236F714
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 10/19/1987
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20236F650 List:
References
NUDOCS 8711020272
Download: ML20236F714 (2)


Text

w.m.,.w g.

gp,~. x.m u a.ww~.,

n w.,.up =a.aa..n w. n.. w w w. n.n e a -

h,

'I L

f' j

-p NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION:

J$

cu' WASHINGTON, D C.20555 a

' 9,,

SAFETY EVALUATION:BY THE 0FFICE 0F NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION.

n

'N SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.

8 TO FACILITY 0PERATING' LICENSE N0; NPF-36 LONG' ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANYL g

SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION a

DOCKET NO. 50-322 1.0' INTRODUCTION

~

By-letter dated Qanuary 12,1987,(LongiIsland'LightinglCompany;(LILCO)'

(the licensee) requested an amendment:to Facility Opera. ting LicensetNo.

NPF-36 for'the.Shoreham. Nuclear Power Station.- TheLproposed amendment' would. change Technical: Specification -(TS): Section 5.5.1.to read, "The 33; foot meteorological-tower shall be located :as tshown ?oni Figure 5.1.1-1.-

The 400 foot meteorological, tower shall be located as shown on' Figure 5.1.3-1 " The existing TS Section 5.5.1 reads, "The meteorological: tower) shall be located on Figure: 5.1.1-l'."

The corresponding figures would also-be substituted.

In-the same letter,-LILC0 requested to changeLTS Section 6.3.'1 to read, a

...except for the Health Physics Engineer who...," instead of. "...except i

for.the Health Physics Supervisor who..."

j

]

2.0 EVALUATION y

The existing TS Section 5.5.1 and figure. indicate:only one meteorological tower.- The proposed amendment does not involve a physical changeLat the-plant.

It would make Section'5.5.1 consistent with:SectionL3.3.7.3,

!' Meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation"Jand Table;3;3.7.3-1.. Therefore, the proposed amendment request consists of'an administrative changetto-N achieve consistency throughout the TSs.

We find the proposed change to be:

J acceptable.

i inconsistentwiththeShorehamNuclearPowerStation(pervisor"Jis;.SNPS). organiza In the existing Section 6.3.1 the'use of.the term "Su chart as -specified'in TS Figure 6.2.2-1, " Unit; Organization.'" This administrative change would align the jobititle in the:TS with the1 responsibilities of. the. Health. Physics Engineer in' the'SNPS _ organization-chart.- We. find the proposed change. to benacceptable.

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL' CONSIDERATION-This amendment involves administrative'and editorial changes. !Accordingly,:

set forth in 10 CFR;51'.22(c)gibility criteria for categorica12 exclusion.

this' amendment meets,the:eli r

(10).

Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no; environmentalsimpact statement nor environmental assessment need be-l prepared in connection with the~ issuance;of1this amendment..

3 R.

10 0

[

O-w.

. a e

,?

i-2-

4.0 CONCLUSION

The Comission made a proposed determination that the amendment invnives no significant hazards consideration which was published in the Federal Register (52 FR 9573) on March 25, 1987 and consulted with the State of -

New York.

No public coments were received, and the. State of New York' did not have any comments.

The staff.has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:- (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and-(2) such activities will be conducted.in compliance with the Comission's regulations and the issuance'of this' amendment will not be inimical tn the-comon defense and the security nor to'the health and safety of the public.

Prinicipal Contributor:

Ronnie Lo Dated; october 19, 1987 1

i 1

(

l l

e-

_ - _