Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR73.55.Proposed Exemption Would Modify Security Requirements to Eliminate Certain Equipment & to Relocate Certain EquipmentML20236F682 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Maine Yankee |
---|
Issue date: |
06/23/1998 |
---|
From: |
Weiss S NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20236F675 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 9807020284 |
Download: ML20236F682 (4) |
|
Similar Documents at Maine Yankee |
---|
Category:ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPRAISALS
MONTHYEARML20206A5561999-04-23023 April 1999 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Proposed Action to Change Liquid & Gaseous Release Rate Limits Included in Radioactive Effluent Control Program Portion of TS to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20 ML20197D1721998-08-11011 August 1998 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Certain Requirements of Regulations to License DPR-36.Exemption Would Modify Emergency Response Plan Requirements ML20236F6821998-06-23023 June 1998 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR73.55.Proposed Exemption Would Modify Security Requirements to Eliminate Certain Equipment & to Relocate Certain Equipment ML20154P3741988-09-27027 September 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Temporary Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i) ML20054H8931982-06-16016 June 1982 Eia Supporting Proposed Facility Mods to Increase Capacity of Spent Fuel Storage Pool 1999-04-23
[Table view] Category:TEXT-ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20206A5561999-04-23023 April 1999 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Proposed Action to Change Liquid & Gaseous Release Rate Limits Included in Radioactive Effluent Control Program Portion of TS to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20 ML20206D7361998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept,Jan-Dec 1998, for Maine Yankee Nuclear Power Station ML20206D7561998-12-31031 December 1998 Myap Estimated Dose & Meteorological Summary Rept for 1998 ML20206D7791998-12-31031 December 1998 Myap Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept,Jan-Dec 1998 ML20206E2721998-12-31031 December 1998 Myap Reg Guide 1.16 Man-Rem Final End of Year Rept for 1998. with ML20197D1721998-08-11011 August 1998 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Certain Requirements of Regulations to License DPR-36.Exemption Would Modify Emergency Response Plan Requirements ML20236F6821998-06-23023 June 1998 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR73.55.Proposed Exemption Would Modify Security Requirements to Eliminate Certain Equipment & to Relocate Certain Equipment ML20217N6741997-12-31031 December 1997 Myap Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept,Jan-Dec 1997 ML20217N6821997-12-31031 December 1997 Myap Estimated Dose & Meteorological Summary Rept for 1997 ML20217N6991997-12-31031 December 1997 Myap Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept,Jan-Dec 1997 ML20217P1321997-12-31031 December 1997 Myap Occupational Radiation Exposure Rept for 1997 ML20155D6611997-12-31031 December 1997 Corrected Occupational Radiation Exposure Rept for 1997 ML20148L3401996-12-31031 December 1996 Reg Guide 1.16 Man-Rem Final End of Yr Rept for 1996. W/ ML20138F3971996-12-31031 December 1996 Myap Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Jan-Dec 1996 ML20138F4101996-12-31031 December 1996 Myap Estimated Dose & Meteorological Summary Rept for 1996 ML20138F4211996-12-31031 December 1996 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept,For 1996 ML20132F9741995-12-31031 December 1995 Rev to 1995 Radioactive Effluent Release Rept ML20056G7501993-06-30030 June 1993 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Jan-June 1993 ML20127C9731992-06-30030 June 1992 Company Semi-Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jan-June 1992 ML20126A9341990-06-30030 June 1990 Rev 2 to Table 1A, Effluent & Waste Disposal Semiannual Rept,First & Second Quarters 1990 Gaseous Effluents, Summation of All Releases ML20127D4171990-06-30030 June 1990 Corrected Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jan-June 1990, Consisting of Revised Tables 1A & 1B Re Summation of All Releases & Elevated Releases for Gaseous Effluents ML20246L0871989-06-30030 June 1989 Semiannual Effluent Release Rept for Jan-June 1989. No Changes Made to ODCM ML20235W8621988-12-31031 December 1988 Semiannual Effluent Release Rept for Jul-Dec 1988 ML20154P3741988-09-27027 September 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Temporary Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i) ML20204G1031988-06-30030 June 1988 Semiannual Effluent Release Rept,Jan-June 1988 ML20151Y5881987-12-31031 December 1987 Annual Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept,Jan-Dec 1987 ML20147H5051987-12-31031 December 1987 Semiannual Effluent Release Rept,Jul-Dec 1987 ML20237H9281987-06-30030 June 1987 Semiannual Effluent Release Rept,Jan-June 1987 ML20207T6981986-12-31031 December 1986 Effluent & Waste Disposal Semiannual Rept for Third & Fourth Quarters,1986 Including Annual Radiological Impact on Man for 1986 ML20151Y5761986-12-31031 December 1986 Annual Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept,1986 ML20209F5731986-06-30030 June 1986 Effluent & Waste Disposal Semiannual Rept for Jan-June 1986 ML20141C5661985-12-31031 December 1985 Co Annual Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept Jan-Dec 1985 ML20210D3061985-12-31031 December 1985 Effluent & Waste Disposal Semiannual Rept,Jul-Dec 1985 ML20135H4971985-06-30030 June 1985 Effluent & Waste Disposal Semiannual Rept,Jan-June 1985 ML20054H8931982-06-16016 June 1982 Eia Supporting Proposed Facility Mods to Increase Capacity of Spent Fuel Storage Pool ML20140B4141981-09-0404 September 1981 Discharge Monitoring Rept,Jul 1981 ML20126K5731981-05-15015 May 1981 Discharge Monitoring Rept,Apr 1981 ML20126H1551981-03-31031 March 1981 Radiological Environ Surveillance Rept for 1980 ML20126F5151981-03-16016 March 1981 Discharge Monitoring Rept for Feb 1981 ML20062K1861980-11-24024 November 1980 Discharge Monitoring Rept for Oct 1980 1999-04-23
[Table view] |
Text
- - __ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - - .
l' y ,
7590-01 1
I UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i- MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY l . MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER STATION -)
DOCKET NO. 50-309 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT .
l The U.S. . Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering issuance of I .an exemption from certain requirements of its regulations to Facility Operating License No. DPR-36, a license held by the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Cnmpany (MYAPC or the licensee). The exemption would apply to the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station, a permaner.tly shutdown plant located at the MYAPC site in Lincoln County, Maine.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Identification of the Pronosed Actior1:
The proposed exemption would modify security requirements to eliminate certain equipment, to relocate certain equipment, to modify certain procedures, and reduce the number of armed responders, due to the permanently shutdown and defueled status of the Maine Yankee facility.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's application dated November 25,1997. The requested action would grant an exemption from certain l requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, " Requirements for Physical Protection of Licensed Activities l
in Nuclear Power Plant Reactors against Radiological Sabotage."
. The Naad for the Pronosed Action:
Maine Yankee was shut down in December 1996. On August 7,1997, the licensee !
informed the Commission that it had decided to permanently cease operations at Maine l 9907020284 990629 l PDR. ADOCK 05000309 ;
F PM e t_____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - - - _ . - - - . _-
1.
,, 4 i
Yankee Atomic Power Station and that all fuel had been permanently rem reactor. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(2), the certifications in the letter facility operating license to permanently withdraw MYAPC's authority to o(
and to load fuelin the reactor vessel. In this permanently shutdown condi poses a reduced risk to public health and sa'ety. Due to this reduced risk, certain i requirements of 10 CFR 73.55 are no longer appropriate. An exemption is requ portions of 10 CFR 73.55 to allow the licensee to implement a revised De Plan that is appropriate for the permanently shutdown and defueled reactor f ,
EnvironmentalImnact of the Pronosed Action: t The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action. The Commission concludes that exemption from certain portions of 10 CFR 73.55 are acceptable given the reduced consequences of the threat to a defueled reactor site wi respect to public health and safety from an act of sabotage resulting in the release of radioactive material contained in the spent fuel.
The proposed change will not increase the probability or consequences of a no changes are being made in the types of effluents that may be released offsite, a
- is no significant increase in the allowable individual or cumulative occupational exp! .
Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
--_ ..aww---_-------n.-- . - - - - - _ . - - - . .- - - - . _ - - - . . -
L g .
With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed action doe features located entirely with the restricted area as defined in .10 CFR Part 20 It does not affect non radiological plant effluents and has no other environmentalimpact. Therefore, the Commission concludes that there are no significant non-radiologicalimp ae with the proposed action.
Alternatives to the Prooosed Action:
Since the Commission has concluded that there is no measurab impact associated with the proposed action, any attemative with equal or grea environmentalimpact need not be evaluated. The principal alternative to the ac[
be to deny the request. Denial of the exemption request would result in no cha}.
current environmentalimpacts. The environmentalimpacts of the proposed action and alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources:
This action does not involve the use of resources not previously considered in t Environmental Statement related to Operation of Maine Yankee Atomic Power Statio ,
Uuly 1972).
Acencies and Persons Consulted:
In accordance with its stated policy, on May 14,1998, the NRC staff consulted with Mr. Patrick Dostle of the State of Maine, Department of Human Services, regardin environmentalimpact of the proposed action. The State official had no comments.
l b_'_ _ _ - . - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
t
. ..y . .
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes tha proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human e .
Accordingly, the Commission has determined not to prepare an environme statement for the proposed action.
' For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee's letter, dated November 25,1997, which is available for public inspection at the Commission Public Document Room, Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC a ,
Public Document Room at the Wiscasset Public Library, High Street, Post Of .
Wiscasset, Maine 04578.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of June 1998.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4
e W Seymour H. Weiss, Director Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Project Directorate Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation j
l l
l 1
- _ ___- _ __ _ __- __ _______ __. _ __ _ _ _ -