ML20236E344
| ML20236E344 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 10/23/1987 |
| From: | Gridley R TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236D431 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8710290182 | |
| Download: ML20236E344 (2) | |
Text
..
h 9
J-
" '~
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA TENNESSEE 374o1 SN 157B Lookout Place j
08T 231987 R
l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission cT' q i
ATTN:- Document Control Desk UI I
]$ f Washington, D.C.
20555 j p.,
Gentlemen:
-g y i
In the Matter of
)
Docket Nos. 50-327 I
. Tennessee Valley' Authority
)-
50-328$
l
-P l
l
-SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN) UNIT 2 - SUPPLEMENTAL ENGINEERING ASSURANCE (EA)
OVERSIGHT REVIEW REPORT.FOR THE DESIGN BASELINE AND VERIFICATION PROGRAM (DBVP)
.I On May 15, 1987, TVA submitted to NRC the results of the EA independent
-oversight of the SQN unit 2 DBVP.
In that transmittal, TVA stated that some citems remained open and would be addressed in a supplemental report to be l
l issued by EA before unit 2 restart.
" Supplemental Engineering Assurance Overs 15ht Review Report, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant - Unit 2, Design Baseline and I
Verification Program, EA-OR-001-S," was issued on September 29, 1987, and l
fulfills the commitment.
The supplemental report is enclosed for use in NRC's evaluation of SQN's DBVP and presents the conclusions reached by the EA Oversight Review Team as a result of their review of D3VP actions, associated EA team actions, and a trend' analysis performed on the observations and condition Adverse to Quality Reports (CAQRs) documented in the original report (EA-OR-001) and in the enclosed report.
The EA team concludes that implementation of the DBVP for restart is satisfactory and that the objectives of the DBVP have been met.
Necessary follow-up activities, such as the postrestart (Phase II) oversight i
and resolution of the one unresolved CAQR, will be accomplished in accordance l
with the DBVP and EA program plans and the TVA Condition Adverse to Quality process.
EA's follow-up verification of corrective action for the Division of Nuclear Engineering Design Calculation Effort will be completed as described in submittals'to NRC dated Jc.nuary 20, 1987, and July 31, 1987.
i l
Additional copies of this report are available from the TVA Licensing Office i
in Bethesda, Maryland.
Please telephone P. J. Polk at (301) 492-5718 if you need more copies.
If you have any questions concerning this issue, please telephone Both L. Hall at (615) 870-7459.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VAL
'Y AUTHORITY 8710290182 % $ h ag PDR ADOCK pgg P
R. Gridley, Di ctor l.
Nuclear Licensing and Regulatory Affairs hg Enclosure 0
i 9, [
cc:
see page 2 j'/M/Y j.
An Equal Opportunity Employer g
L
E/
s.
i
~. -.,
z3) ;
D
/
. j r
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 08T 231987 l
l cc:
'Mr. G. G. Zech,-Assistant Directot for Inspection Programs' OfficeLof Special Projects
.U S.. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission 101-Marietta Street, NW,-Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. J. A. Zwolinski, Assistar t Director for. Proj ects Division of TVA Projects
' Office of Special Projectc r
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4350 East-West. Highway EWW 322 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Sequoyah Resident Inspector Sequoyah Nuclear Plant j
12600-Igou Ferry Road' Soddy Daisy, Tennesseo 37379 i
l
}
[
,.i
(
q t
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _