ML20236D310
| ML20236D310 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 03/16/1989 |
| From: | Danni Smith PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8903230049 | |
| Download: ML20236D310 (2) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:l ,g 'CCN-89-14043- /e PIIILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY { %fP PEACilIKTITOM A1DMIC POWER STATION ,j R. D.1, Box 208 w M*7 Delta, Pennsyhania 17314 PEACH e<nTou-nir rowea or excettesca (717) 45G7014 - -{ D. M. Smith i Vice President l l March 16, 1989 l Docket Nos.: 50-277 50-278 l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTENTION: Document Control Desk l Mail Station P1-137 Washington,'DC 20555 l
Subject:
Deletion of PBAPS Commitment to Monitor Security Ten (10) of Twenty-one (21) Shifts
Reference:
D. M. Smith /PECo to W. T. Russell /USNRC, June 17, 1988
Dear Sir:
This letter confirms our understanding of the conference call of March 8 j 1989 between R. R. Keimig, Chief, Safeguards Section, USNRC; G. A. Bird, i Nuclear Security Specialist; J. W. Devlin, Nuclear Security Consultant; j and R. C. Hirzel, Superintendent-Technical Monitoring, Nuclear Quality j Assurance, PBAPS; that, based on the following information, NQA Monitoring { will schedule monitorings based on the observed performances of Security in i accordance with existing practices, and that PECo's commitment of June 17, j 1988 to monitor Security ten (10) of twenty-one (21) shifts is deleted. t The PBAPS Quality Division has been monitoring the performance of Security l activities since June 1988. This monitoring was scheduled at an intense level due to the poor performance of Security, documented in Quality Assurance Audit AP88-48PL. The Nuclear Quality Assurance (HQA) Technical Monitoring schedule was described to the USNRC in the above referenced ] correspondence. l The results of the NQA Technical Monitoring Program have been analyzed and indicate that significant improvement has been achieved as indicated by the following: 1 1. The percentage of satisfactory activities observed has increased l significantly from 1988 through 1989. Y 8903230049 890316 PDR ADOCK 05000277 l F PDC / l w___________. ~0
,"W l 4 i j 'To: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 4 2. The percentage of satisfactory activities has trended upwards l (better) since the new Contractor and new Security management has been in place. s 3. The number of monitorings requiring immediate or subsequent i corrective action has significantly decreased since October 1988. No Corrective Action Requests (CARS) have been required. f The Contractor Performance Assessment Group (PAG) has also been monitored f and observed.to effectively identify and correct Security program weaknesses. The USNRC Integrated Assessment Team Inspection (IATI) has also concluded that improvements have been achieved in the PBAPS Security Program. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, -l OMS /DRM/ GAB:aus cc: W.T. Russell, Administrator,RegionI,.USNRC(2 copies) R. E. Martin, Project Manager, USNRC' R. R. Keimig, Chief, Safeguards Section, Region I, USNRC R._F. Skelton, Office of Nuclear. Reactor Regulation, USNR T. P. Johnson,. Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC T. M. Gerusky, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania T.' E. Magette, State of Maryland J. Urban, Delmarva Power J. T. Boettger, Public Service Electric and Gas H. C. Schwemm, Atlantic Electric _ _ _ -}}