ML20236D242
| ML20236D242 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1987 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236D226 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8710280087 | |
| Download: ML20236D242 (3) | |
Text
_
.l W
j[#g.4{u q
j
~-og UNITED STATES g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
3 7.
R WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 b,
1 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR ~
REGULATION CONCERNING AN EXEMPTION FROM APPENDIX J FOR CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST METHODOLOGY d
i CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER. COMPANY HADDAM NECK PLANT DOCKET N0. 50-213
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By 1'tter dated July 10, 1987, the licensee requested an exemption from e
10 CFR Part 50,' Appendix J, Paragraph III.A.3, which requires.that all Containment Integrated Leakage Rate Tests (CILRTs) be perfonned in accordance with the American National Standard ANSI N45.4-1972, " Leakage Rate Testing of Containment Structures for Nuclear Reactors."
ANSI N45.4-1972. requires that leakage rate calculations be performed using either'the Total Time method or the Point-to-Point method. The q
licensee's requested exemption would allow use of the Mass Point method to calculate containment leakage rate.. The Mass Point method is described in a more recent standard, ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981, " Containment System Leakage Testing." The staff's review of this request for exemption follows.
2.0 EVALUATION The licensee was recently informed by the staff that the use of the Mass Point method, has not been incorporated into the current provisions of '.0
.f 4
CFR Part 50, Appendix J, and is therefore not legally permitted without an exemption.
In response to this staff position, the licensee has requested an Appendix J exemption.
The licensee has stated in support of i
the application-for exemption from Appendix J, that the Mass Point method I
is a more accurate method of. calculating containment leakage.
It has been recognized by the professional community that the Mass Pcint
{
method is an acceptable means for calculation of containment leakage in addition to the two other methods, Point-to-Point and Total Time, which are
)
referenced in ANSI N45.4-1972 and endorsed by the present regulations. The Mass Point method calculates the air mass at each point in time, and plots it against time. A linear regression line is plotted through the mass-time
. points using a least square fit.
The slope of this line is the leakage rate.
$[kO3Oob b kI P
j l
The Mass Point method has some advantages when compared with the other methods.
In the Total Time method, a series of_ leakage rates are calculated i
on the basis of air mass differences between an initial data point and each individual data point thereafter.
If for any reason (such as instrument error, lack of temperature, equilibrium, ingassing, or outgassing) the initial data point is not accurate, the results of the tests will be affected.
In the Point-to-Point method, the leak rates are based on the i
mass difference between each pair.of consecutive points which are then
)
averaged to yield a single leakage rate estimate.
Mathematically, this can be shown a be the difference between the air mass at the beginning of the j
test and the air mass at the end of the test expressed as a percentage of the containment air mass.
1 It follows from the above that the Point-to-Point method does not include i
mass readings taken during the test and thus the leakage rate is calculated l
on the basis of the difference in mass between two measurements taken at the beginning and at the end of the test, which are 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> apart.
ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981, which was intended to replace ANSI N45.4-1972, specifies the use of the Mass Point method, to the exclusion of the two older methods.
However, the staff has determined that these three methods (Mass Point, Total Time, and Point-to-Point) are acceptable methods which may be used to calculate containment leakage rates. A proposed revision to Appendix J, which has been published for public comment (51 FR 39538, dated October 29,1986), refers to a proposed Regulatory Guide (MS 021-5, October, 1986), which endorses, with exceptions, the ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 standard and the Mass Point method.
In addition to the method of calculation, consideration of the length of the test should also be included in the overall program.
In accordance l
with Section 7.6 of ANSI N45.4-1972, a test duration less than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> is only allowed if approved by the NRC staff, and the only currently approved methodology for such a test is contained in Bechtel Topical Report BF-TOP-1, Revision 1, " Testing Criteria for integrated Leakage Rage Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants," dated November 1, 1972. This approach only allows use of the Total Time method.
l Therefore, the staff will condition the exemption to require a minimum j
test duration of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> when the Mass Point method is used, f
L The licensee's letter also submitted information to identify the special circumstances for granting this exemption pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12. The purpose of Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50 is to assure that containment leak tight integrity can be verified periodically throughout the service lifetime so as to maintain containment leakage within the limit specified in the i
facility Technical Specifications.
The underlying purpose of the rule specifying particular methods for calculating leakage rates is to assure that accurate and conservative methods are used in assess the results of I
l 1
n a
3
- Q'. 6
.I
-1 y,f 1
J
'co'ntainment leak rate tests. Therefore, the staff has determined that the 1
Mass. Point method is an acceptable method for calculation of containment-a.
l1eakage..
3.0 ' CONCLUSION 1
Based.onlthe above. discussion,.the staff finds'.that the licensee's
. proposed. exemption' from paragraph III. A.3 of Appendix.J. to--allow use of.
the Mass Point method as requested in the submittal dated July.10,1987, is; acceptable with the condition of 24' hours minimum test duration, until thepresently'proposedchanges.toAppendixJ(51FR39538)become-
. effective; Thereafter..the licensee sha11' comply with the provisions of such rule (or may renew its request for exemption). The. exemption applies only.to the method of calculating leakage by use of the Mass' Point method and not to any other aspects of the tests.-
1 4.0 Acknowledgements.
Principal Contributors:
F. Akstulewicz, PDISA,'NRR. and J. Pulsipher, SPLB,-NRR.
i 1
1 1
{
)
q d
4 l
l
!l l
i 1
.__--_--.- -_ -