ML20236C939

Informs of Not Granting Extension of License Condition 9.3, Per 870513 Request to Exempt Certain Guards from Part 11 Requirements.Comparison of Members of Security Force to Other Site Personnel Inappropriate.Encl Withheld

ML20236C939
Person / Time
Site:	07000371
Issue date:	06/09/1987
From:	Brach E NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:	Gigliotti R UNITED NUCLEAR CORP. (SUBS. OF UNC, INC.)
References
NUDOCS 8707300245
Download: ML20236C939 (1)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- - - _ _ ___ _ -____ _ - - - - _ V , neoQ'g

                                       #                                                                                   ~

UNITED STATES E o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j  ;$ WASHINGTON, D. C. 205!!3

                                \...../
                                                                                                                                                                        " *7 SGLB:CEG 70-371 9EstGNATED ORIGINAL                                                         ,

Mr. Richard J. Gigliotti l. Corporate Security Director - UNC Naval Products . 67 Sondy Desert Road Uncasville, CT 06382-0981 . j

Dear Mr. Gigliotti:

We have reviewed your May 13, 1987 request for another extension of License Condition 9.3, which exempts certain guards from Part 11 requirements, and your proposed alternatives to the extension. Our review is discussed in the enclosure. l The exemption from 10 CFR Part 11 for certain members of your security force was considered a temporary measure. Since Part 11 does apply to all members of the . security force we cannot continue to grant extensions on your exemption. Your comparison of members of the security force to other site personnel is . inappropriate because Part 11 specifically identifies security-personnel as ' needing clearances and because of the special status / access security personnel have at a site. Accordingly, we will not grant an additional extension but will consider other options which' may resolve the original problem. During our June 15-17 visit to your facility, Messrs. Philip Ting and Charles Gaskin will be prepared to discuss the implementation of a solution to the operational concern raised by the RER team. , Your May 13 letter and the enclosure to this letter has been withheld from public disclosure because it.contains classified (CONFIDENTIAL) National Security Infonnation end must be controlled in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR Part 95. 7

                                                                                                                                                                           . ;n.

Mc' E. iam Brach, Acting Chief 8707300245 a70609 i Licensing Branch ADOCK 0700 Division of Safegudrds

                                        -{DR                                                                                                                         and Transportation

Enclosure:

As stated imen separated from enslosore(a)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    , RANfW.ETEIS B000Hrf A5
                                                              'D                                   ument Traronittid                                                                   l kl $((@%

ierew!!h Contains (ggggggggNYllWAPtMtion) > NATIONAL SECllRITY INFORMAYON TwTuses Matsuser9 F . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _}}