ML20235Y611
| ML20235Y611 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/08/1989 |
| From: | Murley T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Mcmanamon F INTERIOR, DEPT. OF, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235Y614 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8903140421 | |
| Download: ML20235Y611 (18) | |
Text
___ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _
4 f
-GAR 'OB $83 Dr.-Francis P..McManamon,= Chief.
Archeological Assistance Division' National Park Service
-P.O. Box'37127 Washington, D.C.
20013-7127
Dear Dr.iMcManamon:
This is in response to a letter to Chairman Zech dated December 19, 1988, from Dr. Bennie C. Keel requesting the information needed to prepare the Annual Report' to Congress on the Federal Archeology Program for Fiscal Year'1988. The enclosed questionnaire has been completed with appropriate information pertaining to licensees authorized by the NRC to operate. nuclear power plants.
The NRC does not require, maintain, or restore any archeological or historic proporties identified during the environmental review process. When NRC determines that mitigative. measures are required to protect such properties, the licensees are required to take appropriate actions. These mitigative measures are formalized as a condition of the Appendix B (Environmental Protection Plan) attached to the licenses authorizing operation of the nuclear power plants. 'As a permitting Agency, the NRC does not incur any. direct costs associated with the protection or enhancement of archeological and historic resources.
Sincerely, Original Signed by gpgE.M10&
Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Completed Questionnaire DISTRIBUTION N s7(w/ incoming)
PDR(w/ incoming)
ADM/PMSB/PMAS Reading File EDO(2)
TMurley JSniezek JLarkins VWilson HSmith -
DMossburg (EDO 4148)
MBridgers' (ED0 4148) g)
SECY (CRC 88-1246)
Note: NMSS and GPA/ Indian Affairs were contacted regarding this questionnaire.
Both offices a
gave me negative responses.
gh h
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE p:f >[}
8903140421 89030s This Letter was commented on PDR ORG EUSD by the tech editor last year.
ws5 h', A M '
H5 4t 3ll
-As c5 il d
0FC :PMSB:NRR, :PM5B:NRR, :C:PMSB:NRR :D:
R
~
.....: ____.....__:____________:... ____...p:_
NAME :HSMITH
.:VWILSON
- JLARKINS'
- FGI SPIE :
URLEY
.....:............:-_-___....:i
- ...__..... 4-7 --.___:__......--..:___..--...-
DATE :2 / 2W89:: o : 2 / 2W89
/l/89
- f/9/89
- S /G/89 OFFIG; AL REGURD CUPT
0
[W y
w o
U. S. Nuclesr Department / Agency egulatory Commission Date Submitted March 1989 R
Contact "erson um1 wh Phone (7m ) 447.1?R7 ANNU AL REPORT TO CONGRESS BY THE SECRETARY OF THRINTERIOR ON THE FEDERAL ARCEEOLOGY PROGR AM q
1 Fiscal Year 1988 Questioraalre
)
The Federal Archeology Program is part of the larger National Historic Preservation
{
Program which operates by authority of various statutes and regulations written to carry the m out.
The Secretary of the Interior is charged with providing guidance and coordination for Federal archeology and for preparing the report to Congress on Federal archeological activities.
This role is accomplished for the Secretary by the Departmental Consulting Archaeologist, who also servet as the Assistant Director of Archeology within the National Park Service.
A number of statutes, such as the National Historic Preservation Act (N RP A) (P.L.95-515), give the Secretary of the Interior responsibility to guide and coordinate Federal historic preservation activities. This is especially so regarding the Federal Archeology Progra m.
The Secretary is required by Section 5(c) of the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act,(ABPA) (P.L.93-291) and Section 13 of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARP A) (P.L. 96-95), to report to Congress various activities of the Federal Archeology Program. This questionnaire is designed to provide data for the Secretary's report.
Under the National Historic Preservation Act 16 USC 470, as amended, Federal agencias have the general responsibility to cooperate with the Secretary by providing information concerning archeological activities as well as other historic preservation activities. To some extent the questions here may also be relevant to wider preservation issues. The topics covered by the questionnaire and the specific questions have been developed with com ments by archaeologists and historic preservation officers throughout the Federal government. The format and questions below have been modified based upon review of the FY 1987 questionnaire with the intent of making the questionnaire easier to understand, complete, and data more comparable.
Unless otherwise stated, each question refers to activities in FY 1988. Both objective and narrative questions are employed in this questionnaire to collect data concerning Federal archeological activities occurring during FY 1988 (October 1,1987 to September 30, 1988). Several of the narrative questions appeared on the FY 1987 questionnaire. If you addressed them in FY 1987 and have no addition information please indicate so. If you have updated or new information please provide it in the appropriate section. For this questionnaire two narrative questions and a form have been added to colleet data concerning recent a mendments to the Archaeological Resources Protection Act.
_-~m_.
-a
i A.
DepartmentaVAgency Eighlights The most recent report on Federal archeological activities focused on general and quantitative descriptive information. For the FY 1988 report highlights of exe mplary ' projects and, progra ms will be included.
Topics discussed. might include specific archeological surveys, data recovery projects, public awareness.
activities, interagency, intergovern mental, and international cooperation or any other activities that reflect the agencies participation in the Federal Archeology Progra m. (N OTE: addreas on separate sheet, ahmM not exceed two pages) 2 B. Peraitting This section sua marizes the amount of archeological activity undertaken using various legal authorities during FY 1988 Number 1.
Number of permits issued or in effect under ARPA (NOTE: questions 1, 2, and 3 should be autually esclusive) 2.
Number of permitsissued or in effect with NA the Antiquities Act as the priaary authority 3.
Nunber of per mits issued or in effect under agency policies, procedures or guidelines for archeological activities in lieu of an A R P A or Antiquities Act perait (NOTE: 1.e. special use gg permitd 4
Number and percent of permittees field-checked NA (N OTE: allpermitd
(
0 5.
Nunber o'f permits issued for investigations j
related to Section 106 (NH P A) or National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) coapliance 0
activities I
6.
Nunber of per mits issued for investigations not related to compliance activities (NOTE: research for scientific or scholarly purposes, interpretation, NA etcJ
- Not applicable (NA)
Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 Cuestinemaire, Page 2 1
4 7.
Total number of investigations begun or underway in wnich no permits were issued, but which complied with conditions and standards required by ARP A, g
conducted by the agency or under contract 8.
Number of perait applications received (N OTE : alltypeal NA 9.
Number of permit applications denied (N OTE: alltypes)
NA 10.
Number of peraits suspended (N OTEt all types 0 NA 11.
Number of denied or suspended permits appealed NA 12.
Nuaber of notifications toIndian tribes of proposed work under ARP A or being done in conformance with ARPA (i.e. work done under permit, by agency or under contract) that aay possibly hara or destroy sites having religious or cultural importance for the tribes (W OTE: as required by Sec. 7 of the Pinal ARPA Unifora regulations, based on Sec. 4(c) of the Act)
O Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Permitting Data 1
Marratiee QtMan (address on separate sheet) 13.
Please describe any computerized systems that your agency is using to record and m onitor ARPA, Antiquities Act, and/or other per mits for archeological investigations. If this systea is part of a larger system, please note and sum marize the other kinds of information included on the system. Note the kind of hardware i
and software used for any syste as that are mentioned.
j 1
1 m
.m a
n A
A m
a mM AAAA m
aA O
N_
O
O t*
C. Enforcement This section sua aarizes FY 1988 violations, citations, arrests, prosecutions, and convictions under various Federal authorities that afford protection to archeologicalproperties. (NOTE: see enclosed LOOT form for ARPA violations) l l
1 l
Nu m ber 14.
Nu a ber of docu a ented violations of A R P A, the Antiquities Act, Federalproperty laws, or other statutes protecting archeological properties reported on 3and managed by agency (N O TE: as defined in Sec. 6 of ARP A, a violation is any actualor atte apted escavation, re noval, da sage to, alteration, or defacement of an archenlarft-mi property on Federa13and without a permitissued i
or an eneaption listed in Sec. 4 of ARPA.
l Exa mplas of violations may be fresh holas l
dug into a site, vehicle tracks through the site, etcJ NA 15.
Nuaber of arrests aade in cases of docuaented vandalisa or 3coting NA l
1.6.
Nuaber of citations issued in cases of docuaented vandalisa or Jooting NA 17 Nu aber of prosecutions in cases of docuaented vandalisa orlooting (NOTE:for each prosecution please complete the enc 3ceed LOOT Clearinghouse sua aary fora and send it along with the completed FY 1988 ;_n _"'-==4-e)
NA 18.
Nuaber of misdemeanor convictions under ARPA NA 19.
Nuaber of felony convictions under ARPA NA 20.
Number of second ARPA offenses (N O TE: included in questions 18 and 19)
NA 21.
Nunber of cases of docuaented vandalisa or looting of archeological 1 property that were prosecuted using an authority other than AR P A (NOTE: 31st gecific authority and casasin which they were used under Caveats section)
NA 22.
A a ount collected in criainal fines under A R P A
$ NA l
t l
{
r.d. rat Aramoniary a. port-rT 1m oie., Page 4
- a v
j 1
23.
Nu m ber of civil penalties applied (N OTE: os permitted by Sec. 7 of ARP A or other authadHad NA i
24 A m ount collected in civil penalties
{
under A R P A
$ NA 25.
Costs for restoring or repairing archeological properties in cases in which civilpenalties have been assessed for violations
)
of A RP A or other authorities S NA 26.
A mount given in tewards under AR P A (N OTE: as peraitted by Sec. Sa of ARPA)
S NA 27.
Com aercialvalue of artifacts seized and retained by the government under ARP A
$ NA (N O TE: as per mitted by Sec. 8b of A RP A) 28.
Com mercial value of property seized and retained by the governmentin ARP A convictions (NOTE: as peraitted by Sec. Sb of ARPA)
$ NA 29.
A m ount spent on law enforce a ent for archeological 1 resource protection S NA 30.
Percent of the overall cost of law enforce aent associateo directly with archeological resource protection NA Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Enforcement Data Marrative QuanHans (address on separate aheet) 31.
Please describe effective cooperative projects, methods, and/or techniques that your agency has used to inprove ARP A enforcement. Exaaples mightinclude the use of remote sensing equipment for monitoring site locations, or interagency cooperative agreements for combined surveillance of adjacent land units and concurrent jurisdiction of law enforce m ent personnel.
m
a.
t 9
32.
What actions are planned or underway concerning the recent amendment to ARP A (P.L. 96-95) requiring agencies to develop documents for reporting suspected violations of ARP A and establishing procedures concerning when and how these documents are to be completed by officers, employees, and agents of their respective agencies? NA 33.
Recent amendments to ARPA (P.L. 96-95) require Federal agencies to establish a program to increase public awareness of the significance of the archeological
)
resources located on public lands and Indian lands end the need to protect such resources and to submit an annual report to Congress en the results of these activities. What actions are planned or underway concerning these amend ments? NA
)
D. Archeala@m1 Resources Protection Education / Training This section collects information on the extent to which agencies made their i
archaeologists, law enforcement personnel other cultural resource personnel
{
managers and field personnel aware of archeological resource protection during FY 1988.
Nu a ber 34 Nu abet and percent of law enforce a ent personneltaking Federal Law Enforcement Training Center course (FLETC) or other comparable 40 hour4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> course on archeological resoutce protection NA
(
4) 35.
Number and percent of archaeologists and other culturalresource personneltaking FLETC or other comparable 40 hour4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> course on archeological resource protection NA
(
4) 36.
Nuaber of other personnel (aanagers, field personnel etc) taking FLETC or other comparable 40 hour4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> course on archeological resource protection NA 37 Nuabet and percent of law enforce aent personnel taking other courses or portions of courses (8-16 hours) on archeological resource protection NA
(
4) 38 Number and percent of archaeologists and other cultural resource personnel taking other courses or portions of courses (8-16 hours) on archeological resource protection NA
(
4)
(
__nmnn
_n m
n
39.
Nuaber of other personnel (managers, field personnel, etc) taking other courses or portions of courses on archeological resource protection NA Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Education / Training Data Narrative Question (address on separate sheet) 40.
Please describe any training courses used for archeological resource protection training or general training in archeology. Include training other than the FLETC course on ARPA enforcement, the NPS 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> course on archeological resources protection, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation course on Section 106 procedures. In addition, feel free to offer opinions concerning what training would be useful. Be as specific as p=ihla.
NA E. Identification and Evaluation Ihvastigations This section provides data for estiaating the effort put into identification and evaluation investigations by agencies,*1and use applicants, or contractors working for agencias during FY 1988.
Nu a ber 41.
Nuaber of overvisws, inventories or literature / sap searches associated with general planning activities or undertakings for the purpose of identifying archeologicalproperties (50 TE: resulting in a 3atter to the filas, a j
report, or another type of written product to docuaentits results. Include activities conducted by the agency, under ocotract, or by 3and uma applicantg O
l t
i
- " Licensee" is the appropriate term for NRC.
Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 Questionnaire, Page 7 L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______ _ __ _ _ __ _ ___ _ _ _ ___
s-1 l
l i
42.
Number of agency FTEs used for overviews, inventories or literature /m ap searches O
{
l 43.
Amount expended by agency for overviews, inventories or literature /m ap searches (N OTE: include salary and benefit costas, support costs, and contract costa) 0 44 Nu mber of overviews, inventories or literature /
map searches conducted by land use applicants and the estimated amount expended S
0 45.
Number of field studies to identify and evaluate archeological properties (N O TE: include those conducted by the agency, under contract, or by land use chetag 0
46 Number of agency FTEs used for identifying and evaluating archeologicalproperties O
47.
A mount expended by agency for identifying and evaluating archeologicalproperties (N O TE: include salary and benefit costs, mapport = *=r and contract costa)
S O
48 Number of field studies to identify and evaluate archeologicalproperties conducted byland use applicants and the estimated a mount expended S
O 49.
Nuaber of acresinspected by identification and evaluation investigations 0
50.
Nuaber of arche.ologicalsites newly identified 0
Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification ofIdentification and Evaluation Data Federal AWi Report-7Y 1988 Q'Ne, Page 8 1
'a I
Narrative QuanHan (address on separate sheet) 51.
Recent a mend m ents to the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (P.L. 96-95) require Federal agencies to develop phns for surveying hnds under their control to determine the nature and extent of archeological 1 resources and to prepare a schedule for surveying hnds that are likely to contain the most scientifically valuable archeological 1 resources. What actions are planned or underway concerning these aaendments?
ND (No Data to Report)
F. Data Recovery This section provides data for estimating the effort devoted,to data recovery projects during FY 1988.
Nember
- 52. Number of data recovery projects which included compliance related archeological data recovery (NOTE: compliance data recovery projects are.
defined to be investigations designed to mitigate an adverse ispect or to achieve a determination of "no adverse" effect, Sec. 106. Include data recovery projects conducted by agency, under contract, or by land use applicants)
O 53.
Number of agency FTEs used for compliance data recovery 0
54.
A m ount expended for compliance rehted data recovery (W OTE: include salary and benefit costa, support costs, and contract oostg 3
0 55 Number of compliance rehted data recovery projects conducted by hnd use applicants and the estiaated amount expended s
O
- by licensees i
Federal Arabsalogy Report-FY 1988 Q-*4annake, Page 9 1
a 56.
Number of data recovery projects unrelated to Section 106 compliance. (NOTE: this category would include data recovery aeraciated with site protection for enhMration, site protection for law I
enforce ment, interpretation, collection of baseline data, specific research questions and/or any other l
category of data recovery not directly related to l
Section 106 ooapliance. Include those conducted by j
mgency, under contract, or by land use arHe = itsi NA l
57 Number of agency FTEa used for data recovery not associated with compliance NA 58 A mount expended by agency for data recovery unrelated to compliance (NOTE: include malary and benefit costs, arpport oosts, and contract oostd NA 59.
Nuaber of data recovery projects not associated with compliance conducted byland use applicanta I
and the estiaated aaount expended S
NA l
Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Data Recovery Data Narrative Oh (address on separate sheet) 60 Describe com aunication, cooperation, and exchange between private individuals having collections of archeological resources and data (obtained before enactm ent of A R P A), professional archeologista, and associations of professional archaeologists.
NA e
[
Federal Ai-ti-IReport-FY 1988 Qae*4'innake, Page 10 h
l C. Unanticipated Discoversas (by licensees)
This section provides data for estimating the extent to which archeological properties are discovered unexpectedly during the imple mentation of an.
undertaking. subsequent to completion of the Section 106 review and compliance process during FY 1988.
Number i
61.
Subsequent to Section 106 compliance, number of agency undertakings resulting in the discovery of unanticipated archeological resources 1
6 2.'
Number of unanticipated discovery situations where the resources were judged important enough for data collection to be conducted or design changes aade to avoid them I
63.
Number of agency FTEs ND used for unanticipated discoveries 64.
A mount expended by agency for unanticipated discoveries (N OTEs include salary and M gg ocats, mapport oosts, and contract costne 65.
Number of unanticipated discoveries handled by land use applicants and the estimated amount ND expended Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Unanticipated Discoveries Data
- During FY 1988, the NRC is aware of one unanticipated archeological discovery.
The Portland General Electric (PGE) Company, the licensee for the Trojan Nuclear Power Plant, which is located in Columbia County, Oregon, notified the Siletz Confederated Tribes that while completing preliminary excavation for an engineering building it was found that some of the site contained some Native American burials.
PGE now plans to construct the building on an alternate site. The results of NRC's review of the cultural aspects of the Trojan site are documented in the Final Environmental Statement for the Operating License Application review, dated August 1973.
l 4
f f
1.a. rat arch.aaoer m. port-FY DSS Opas*4a== mere, Page 11
1 T
a -.
r E. Estiaating the Federa' Archeological Resource Base This section provides baseline inform ation about the extent of archeological resources within the lands managed by Federalagencies and the quality of our knowledge about thea. It is recognized that the questions below callfor estimates. We ask agency specia12sts to make the best estimates posenble through FY 1988 and write any caveats concerning them in the space provided.
Number 66.
Total acres managed by 1icensees**
26,000 67.
Total acres and percentinvestigated sufficiently to identify 100 % of the archeologicalproperties (N O TE: Le. investigated at an appropriate levelofintensity to eliminate the need for further systeastic inventory) 7,000 (27 4) 68.
Total acres and percent investigated to identify less than 100 t of the archeological properties 0 ( 0 t) 69.
Total acres and percentginvestigated (E o TE: this abound equal the total acreage indicated in Th 66 minus acres surveyed reportad in questions 67 48) 19,000
( 73 %)
70.
Totalnumber of known archeological properties on land aanaged 487 71.
Estiaate of the totalnuaber of archeological properties onland aanaged (EOTE: 1.e. nu mher of archaalayis a1 altas that aay actuaBy exist.
3hc2nde known sited 487 72.
Nunber and percent of the total known archeologicalproperties listed on the National Register Of Historic Places (N R E P) (E OTE: 9mma*4r== 72-76 abauld sua to 100 t) 0
( 0 t) 73.
Nuabet and percent of total known archeological properties deterained eligible for the N RHP by the Keeper or considered eligible through documented consultation with the SBPO O
(0 t)**
- Licensee
- Also seeCaveat on the next page.
.m. ~
mm
?
2 74 Number and percent of the total known 1
archeological properties adequately evaluated,
)
but not listed, considered, or for a ally i
determined eligible (NOTE: La., fitting I
106 22 neither questions 73 or 73 g
g3 75.
Number and percent of the total known archeological properties deter aineo ineligible for the N RE P by the Keeper or through O
documented consaitation with the SBPO
( 0 g3 76.
Number and percent of the totalknown 381 78 archeologicalproperties not evaluated g
g3 Cavesta Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Archeological Resource Base Data
- The acreage reflected in this questionnaire response involves plants that have cultural resources requirements stated in the Appendix B (Environmental Protection Plan) for licenses authorizing the operation of the following plants : Millstone 3. San Onofre 2/3, Vogtle, Hope Creek, Susquehanna, Diablo Canyon, Braidwood, Palo Verde, Callaway and Waterford.
In addition, the Trojan plant is included because of unanticipated archeological discoveries during FY 1988.
In ' regard to the Callaway plant, there are approximately 25 sites potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Properties (NRHP).
NRC requested an eligibility determination from the Keeper of the NRHP, which has not been rr.ndered yet because of the licensee's ongoing negotiations with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation is currently reviewing all of the documentation to recommend a plan for resolution.
Narrative Qih Suggestions for isproving FY 1989 questionnaire.
I Federal Archenk3gy' Report-FY 1988 Cthulre, Pave 13
a5 UNITED STATES
[
()r g{
jfp g
p, NUGLEAR REEULATCRY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655 E
h
{
+
EDO Principal Correspondence Control
.}
1 FROMs DUE: 03/10/B9 EDO CONTROL: 0004148 DOC T)T: 12/19/8B FINAL REPLY:
l 0;nnie C. Keel i
U. S. Dept. of the Interior TO:
/ )
Chairman Zech FOR SISNATURE OF:
- GRN CRC NO: 88-1246 s
Murley DESC:
ROUTING:
O REQUEST COMPLETE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE SECRETARY'S ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE FEDERAL ARCHEOLOGY PROGRAM DATE: 12/22/88 ASSIGNED TO:
CONTACT:
NRR Murley CPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:
}$
M C'D0 Wf 4
H
~
NRR RECEIVED: DECEMBER 23, 1988 p :GILLESPIE M Lqek. h ACTION:
I._.
= g SNIEZEK
{
f "Ra RouTIno:
CRU7CHFIELD GILLESPIE W
Ms d)s i 3SP MDSSBURG ACTION _
^
DUE T0 hRR DIRECTOR'S B O %,n t 1: 1999
o.
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET PAPER NUMBER:
CRC-88-1246 IDGGING DATE: Dec 22 88 ACTION OFFICE:
EDO AUTHOR:'
B. Keel l.
AFFILIATION:
DOI (DEPT OF INTERIOR)
LETTER DATE:
Dec 19 88 FILE CODE: O&M-12 DOI
SUBJECT:
Questionnaire'for the Secretary of the Interior annual report to Congress on Federal archeological activities ACTION:
Appropriate DISTRIBUTION:
SPECIAL FIANDLING: None NOTES:
DATE DUE:
SIGNATURE:
DATE SIGNED:
AFFILIATION:
Reed 011. EDO _g Date
- Tim t.co--- O 0 414 E
4 f/{k
,/)/)---
c, UNITED STATES M
(
g g
NueLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 E
g 4
'hf ] g
-*****,o EDO Principal Correspondence Control FROM:
DUE: 03/10/89 EDO CONTROL's 0004148 DOC'DT: 12/19/88 FINAL REPLY Bennie C. Keel U.
S. Dept. of the Interior
[ 1 C airrnan Zech FOR SIGNATURE OF:
- GRN CRC NO: 88-1246 Murley DESC:
ROUTING:
i REQUEST COMPLETE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE SECRETARY'S ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE FEDERAL ARCHEOLOGY PROGRAM DATE: 12/22/88 ASSIGNED TO:
CONTACT:
NRR Murley SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:
(
0
~
,&c f%
NRR RECEIVED: DECEMBER 23, ?988 Wf
'~
M ACTION:
PMAS:GILLESPIE/ m,Lae.k. h rt r,
NRR ROUTING:
MURLE NIEZEE
{
f CRUTCHFIELD
_ M Mi GILLESPIE b
f
)
MOSSBURG (dJ ' J SP ACT(0N DUE TO NRR DIRECTOR'S OiOC BY J e,", 9, l999
- -t
~ OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET PAPER NUMBER:
CRC-88-1246 LOGGING DATE: Dec 22 88 ACTION OFFICE:
EDO AUTHOR:
B.
Keel AFFILIATION:
DOI (DEPT OF INTERIOR)
LETTER DATE:
Dec 19 88 FILE CODE: O&M-12 DOI
SUBJECT:
Questionnaire for the Secretary of the Interior annual report to Congress on Federal archeological activities ACTION:
Appropriate DISTRIBUTION:
SPECIAL HANDLING: None NOTES:
DATE DUE:
SIGNATURE:
DATE SIGNED:
AFFILIATION:
Reed Oil EDO
_pg Date ilm1L t LO--- 0 0 414 E
o TA E " M" United States Department of the Interior E.".'.=
H M
fP NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Tm P.O. BOX 37127 WASHINGTON. D.C. 20013-7127 IN Rt. PLY RIFER 70.
H24(436)
DEC I 9 E The Honorable Lando W. Zech, Jr.
Chairman Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H St. N.T.
Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Mr. Zech:
Each year the Secretary of the Interior prepares a report to Congress on Federal archeological activities. The current version of this report has proven especially useful for Federal agencies and Congressional committees in amending the Archaeological!
Resources Protection Act to improve its law enforcement provisions. The current report also provides a baseline description of the kinds and extent of Federal archeology. It is expected that this and future reports will prove to be generally helpfulin many ways.
As indicated in Sections 2 and 101(h) of the National Historic Preservation < Act (NHPA),
(as amended)
P.L.95-515, assernbling, analyzing, and disseminating technical information; providing assistance with professional methods and techniques for archeological preservation; and administering the historic preservation program are part of the Secretary of the Interior's responsibility to provide leadership in the preservation of the prehistoric and historic resources of the United States. The Secretary also is required by the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (as amended) P.L.93-291, and the Archaeological Resources Protection. Act of 1979 (ARPA) (as amended)
P.L. 96-95 to report to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and the j
House Interior and Insular Affairs Committee of the United States Congress, on Federal archeological activities.
To assist in the preparation of this report for Fiscal Year 1983, as in past years, I am requesting that you complete and return the enclosed questionnaire within 90 days of receipt of this letter (on or before March 15, 1989).
All major sections that appeared in the FY 1987 report questionnaire are part of the FY 1988 questionnaire. In some sections, questions that appeared as separate questions in FY 1987 ha/e been combined into a single response, while other questions have been eliminated completely. In Section F (Data Recovery), questions dealing with types of research questions addressed by projects have been deleted.
Data Recovery is now divided into projects conducted to mitigate an adverse impact or to achieve a l
determination of "no adverse" effect, i.e. Section 106 (NHPA) and data recovery projects conducted for reasons other than compliance. This distinction will assist in collecting data relating to recent amendments to the Archaeological Resources Protection Act.
Overall the total number of questions has been decreased for the FY 1988 questionnaire, in addition to the above modifications the following minor modifications have been made:
(1) questions have been numbered consecutively to allow easier use especially for those using computers to compile data, (2) additional notes have been added to questions to clarify targeted data, (3) narrative questions are now included under the appropriate heading as opposed to being located at the end of the questionnaire, and two narrative 8
l.
l l
e questions have been added to collect data on two recent amendments to ARPA, while three questions have been deleted. With respect to the recent amendments to ARPA, the I
LOOT Clearinghouse-Case Summary form has been added to assist in collecting information on violations of this Act.
Response to the FY 1987 questionnaire was very good, over 90% of the agencies queried provided detailed responses. These data have been entered into computer spreadsheets and report preparation is underway. The report based on data provided for FY 1985 and FY 1986 has been completed'and is presently undergoing internal review. The Table of Contents from this report is enclosed for your information. As a result of the level of response, the combined annual report for FY 1985 and FY 1986 is the most o
comprehensive report on Federal archeology activities prepared to date.
The information provided for FY 1987 should allow a similar level of reporting.
With submittal of the FY 1988 data there will be, for the first time, four years of comparable data.
For FY 1988,in addition to analysis at the national level, we would like to collect data in a way that would allow more precise analysis. Analysis of data subdivided by field offices for large agencies would greatly increase the ef festiveness of identifying Federal archeological activity problems and better facilitate development of recommendations to improve the situation. Although this data request is optional it would provide more detailed information for analysis if responses to questionnaires were provided by regional, state, or division of fice, by the larger agencies i.e. BLM, Corps of Engineers, FWS, the military services, Forest Service, NPS, and Reclamation.
In order to assist departments / agencies in completing the questionnaire, Questionnaire Guidelines are enclosed.
Please send the completed questionnaire, on or before March 15,1988, to Dr. Francis P.
McManamon, Chief, Archeological Assistance Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, D.C. 20013-7127. If you have any questions, please feel free to call George S. Smith at (202) 343-4101, FTS 343-4101. We look forward to your response.
On behalf of Congress and the Secretary of Interior,I would like to thank you in advance for your response to this request and your support in previous years.
Sincerely, y_:;"
r Bennie C. Keel, Ph.D.
Departmental Consulting Archaeologist
Enclosures:
FY 1988 Questionnaire, including LOOT form FY 1988 Questionnaire Guidelines Table of Contents from the FY 1985/FY 1986 report
[
FY 1988 Q UESTIO N N AIRE FO R THE SEC R ETAR Y'S AN N U AL REPO kT TO CO NG RESS ON THE FEDER AL ARCHEOLOGY PROGR AM G UID ELIN ES Introduction The Federal Archeology Program is part of the larger National Historic Preservation Program which operates by authority of various statutes and regulations written to carry the m out.
The Secretary of the Interior is charged with providing guidance and coordination for Federal archeology and for preparing the annual report to Congress on Federal archeological activities.
This role is accomplished for the Secretary by the Departmental Consulting Archaeologist, who also serves as the Assistant Director of Archeology within the National Park Service.
The Federal Archeology Program functions by integrating the values of preservation, research, and education with the individual missions of each department / agency, none of which has archeology as a primary mission. Each has its own internal organization to comply with Federal mandates concerning archeological resources. The way in which different departments / agencies are involved in the Federal Archeology Program is dependent upon their function within the govern m ent.
Some are responsible for managing large amounts of land or other kinds of resources.
These agencies are responsible for the care of important archeological resources under their control Other departments / agencies function to help other levels of government, or the private sector, to develop resources and facilities. They are responsible for seeing that developments that they facilitate, license or fund do not wantonly destroy important archeological resources. Some departments / agencies have responsibilities in both areas.
Because of the different roles, departments / agencies can take very different approaches to how they meet their archeological responsibilities. Some have large archeological staffs to handle their responsibility, while others have passed along the responsibility for accomplishing the actual archeological activities to state or local agencies that are undertaking the development action.
Instructions for Completing the FY 1988 Questionnaire Question Responses: Due to the range of missions and responsibilities of various govern mental agencies, not all questions will apply to each agency. For example, not all agencies issue per mits. Although questions can be approached differently,it isimportant that uniform terms be be used to facilitate data input and comparison. For the FY 1988 questionnaire, each set of questions is followed by a section to allow for further discussion of responses if necessary.
Please provide a co m p=6 questionnaire sua aerizing information collected froa regkons., dastricts, divimons, etc. If possible, please provide data for individual regions, states, project offices, com mands, divisions, etc., to allow regional, as well as, national level evaluation of data. It is understood that hard data may not be available for some questions and that knowledgeable estimates m ust be m ade.
l:
h l
l In completing the questionnaire, please fill out each line with data or with the following abbreviations ONLY:
NA (Not Applicable). This term should only be used to indicate that the agency has no responsibility for this activity.
If a section or a question has subsections / questions, please fillin each line with N A. N A should not be used to indicate that there is no data to report or that the answer is zero (0). For exa mple, agencies that do not issue permits or deal with enforce ment would' respond to these questions with N A.
ND (No Data to Report). This term should be used to indicate that although the.
agency conducts such activities no data is available for FY 1988.
For exa mple, if data was not available for how many FTEs were used for certain activities, the response would be N D. If data is not available for some other reason, use N D, but also indicate the reason (s) in the caveats section.
O Iero (0). This response should only be used to indicate the absence of a quantity (nothing). Zero should not be used to indicate lack of data. This l
term should be used to indicate that although the agency conducts such activities, no activities took place during FY 1988. For example,if an agency did not have any undertakings that included data recovery, the answer to a question asking about the number of data recovery projects conducted would be zero (0).
In the event that a Department / Agency takes the position that the entire questionnaire is not applicable, please return the uncompleted questionnaire with an appropriate cover letter of explanation. Notification made in this manner will be considered as a response to the questionnaire for purposes of the annualreport to Congress.
Percents (%): Raw data on which percents are figured are requested to assist in comparing data within agencies and between agencies. Percents should be rounded to the nearert tenth of a percent, e.g. 95.54 % would be 95.5 %.
Dollar A mounts ($): Round all dollar amounts to the nearest dollar, and specify if a mounts are gross estimates.
FTE - (Full-tim e Equivalency)
An FTE is equal to one person working full-time for one year. Percent of FTEs can.9 figured accordingly, e.g. 0.5 FTE equals one person working for 1/2 year.
Department / Agency Na mes and Abbreviations: The first time any department /agancy na me is used, please spell it out followed by the abbreviation, e.g. Bureau of tand Manage ment (BLM). Please do the same for any department / agency specific na mes or progra ms, e.g. Archeological Assistance Division (A A D), Alaska Regione.1 Office ( A R 4, National Archeological Database (N ADB).
o Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification: This section follows each set of questions and Js provided to allow agencies to further explain, evaluate, clarify, and more accurately portray specific. information concerning the response.
For example, an agency might indicate that a response represents some but not all regions, districts, or divisions. Use arabic numbers to correspond caveats with specific responses.
Narrative Questions: Provide answers to the narrative questions on a separate sheet.
If you responded to the narrative questions on the FY 1987 questionnaire, please provide any updated infor mation. Narrative information should be compiled from regions, states, project offices, coa aands, divisions, etc., as part of the coapr=nte qua=Harinaire.
Please regond to all 7-Waam with either a response or N A, ND.
Responses to the narrative questions were an excellent source of information and added greatly to the overall content of the FY 1985/FY 1986 (in review) and the FY 1987 (in progress) annual reports.
D epart m ent/ Agency Highlights:
This section provides an opportunity for departm ents/ agencies to highlight, interpret, and evaluate their archeological activities.
Topics discussed might include specific archeological surveys and excavations, public awareness activities (publications, reports, brochures, exhibits, lectures, films, videos, awards, education progra ms, site protection programs, etc.)
interagency, intergovernmental, and international cooperation, or any other activities that reflect the agencies participation in the Federal Archeology Program. This section should not exceed two (2) double-spaced type-written pages.
Photographs: Please submit black and white photographs (at least 5 x 7) depicting I
Federal archeological activities. Although Black and white photographs are preferred, color photographs or slides will be accepted. On the back of each photograph please print the appropriate caption (identify people by name and position) and photographic credit line.
Submittal Data: As with previous years, questionnaires are due 90 days after receipt of letter by agency. Therefore, questionnaires should be returned on or before Natch 15, 1989. Please callif it appears that this deadline will not be met. Your cooperation in meeting this a mbitious schedule will be greatly appreciated.
Questions: If you have any questions concerning the questionnaire please call George S.
Smith or Frank McManamon in the National Park Service, Archeological Assistance Division (202) 343-4101, FTS 343-4101.
FN P:G.S.S mith;34 3-4101:12/2/88 Directory: A N R;Docu m ent:88questgui
o s
Departm ent/ Agency Date Submitted Contact Person Phone (
)
ANNU AL REPORT TO CONGRESS BY THE SEC RET AR Y OF THE INTER *.O R ON THE FEDER AL ARCHEOLOGY PR'JGR AM Fiscal Year 1988 Quest 2onnaste The Federal Archeology Program is part of the larger National Historic Preservation Program which operates by authority of various statutes and regulations written to carry the m out.
The Secretary of the Interior is charged with providing guidance and coordination for Federal archeology and for preparing the report to Congress on Federal archeological activities.
This role is acco mplished for the Secretary by the Departmental Consulting Archaeologist, who also serves as the Assistant Director of Archeology within the National Park Service.
A number of statutes, such as the National Historic Preservation Act (N H P A) (P.L.95-515), give the Secretary of the Interior responsibility to guide and coordinate Federal historic preservation activities. This is especially so regarding the Federal Ucheology Progra m.
The Secretary is required by Section 5(c) of the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act,(AHP A) (P.L.93-291) and Section 13 of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (A R P A) (P.L. 96-95), to report to Congress various activities of the Federal Archeology Progra m.
This questionnaire is designed to provide data for the Secretary's report.
Under the National Historic Preservation Act 16 USC 470, as amended, Federal agencies have the general responsibility to cooperate with the Secretary by providing information concerning archeological activities as well as other historic preservation activities. To some extent the questions here may also be relevant to wider preservation issues. The topics covered by the questionnaire and the specific questions have been developed with com ments by archaeologists and historic preservation officers throughout the Federal government. The format and questions below have been modified based upon review of the FY 1987 questionnaire with the intent of making the questionnaire easier to understand, complete, and data more comoarable.
Unless otherwise stated, each question refers to activities in FY 1988. Both objective and narrative questions are e mployed in this questionnaire to collect data concerning Federal archeological activities occurring during FY 1988 (October 1,1987 to Septe mber 30, 1988). Several of the carrative questions appeared on the FY 1987 questionnaire. If you addressed them in FY 1?87 and have no addition information please indicate so. If you have updated or new information please provide it in the appropriate section. For this questionnaire two narrative questions and a form have been added to collect data concerning recent a mendments to the Archaeological Resources Protection Act.
I Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 Questionnaire, Page 1
A.-
Departmental / Agency Highlights The most recent report on Federal archeological activities focused on general and quantitative descriptive infor mation. For the FY 1988 report highlights of exemplary projects and programs will be included.
Topics discussed might include specific archeological surveys, data recovery projects, public awareness activities, interagency, intergovern mental, and international cooperation or any other activities that reflect the agencies participation in the Federal Archeology -
Progra m. (N OTE: address on separate sheet, should not exceed two pages)
B. Permitting This section sum matizes the amount of archeological activity undertaken using variouslegalauthorities during FY 1988.
Number 1.
Number of permits issued or in effect under ARPA (NOTE: questions 1, 2, and 3 should be mutually esclusive) 2 Number of permits issued or in effect with the Antiquities Act as the primary authority 3.
Number of permits issued or in effect under agency policies, procedures or guidelines for archeological activities in lieu of an A R P A or Antiquities Act permit (NOTE: 1.e. special use permitse 4
Number and percent of permittees field-checked (N OTE: allpermitz) i
%)
5.
Num ber of permits issued for investigations related to Section 106 (NH P A) or National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) compliance activities 6.
Nu m ber of permits issued for investigations not related to compliance activities (N OTE: research for scientific or scholarly purposes, interpretation, etc.)
Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 QuMaruuhe, Page 2
c 7.
Total nu mber of investigations begun or underway in which no permits were issued, but which complied with conditions and standards required by ARP A, conducted by the agency or under contract 8.
Number of permit applications received (N OTE : all types) 9.
Number of permit applications denied (N OTE: alltypes) 10.
Number of permits suspended j
(N OTE: all types) 11 Number of denied or suspended per mits appealed ~
12 Number of notifications to Indian tribes of proposed work under ARP A or being done in confor mance with A RP A (i.e. work done under per mit, by agency or under contract) that may possibly harm or destroy sites having religious or cultural importar.ce for the tribes (E OTE: as required by Sec. 7.of the Final ARP A Unifor a regulations, based on Sec. 4(c) of the Act)
Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Permitting Data Narrative Question (address on separate sheet) 13.
Please describe any computerized e.ystems that your agency is using to record and m onitor ARPA, Antiquities A ct, and/or other per mits for archeological investigations. If this syste m is part of a larger syste m, please note and su m m arize the other kinds of information included on the system. Note the kind of hardware and software used for any syste ms that are mentioned.
Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 Quma*4nnsnaire, Page 3 I
s C. Enforcement This section sum matizes FY 1988 violations, citations, arrests, prosecutions, and convictions under various Federal authorities that afford protection to archeologicalproperties. (NOTE: see encinaad LOOT form for ARPA violations)
Nu m ber 14 Nu m ber of docu m ented violations of A R P A, the Antiquities Act, Federalproperty laws, or other statutes protecting archeologicalproperties reported on land managed by agency (N OTE: as defined in Sec. 6 of A R P A, a vaolation is any actualor atteapted excavation, reaoval, daaage to, alteration, or deface a ent of an archealagical property on FederalJand without a perait immued or an ese aption 11sted in Sec. 4 of A R P A.
Exaaples of violations aay be fresh holes dug into a site, vehicle tracks through the site, etc.)
15.
Number of arrests made in cases of documented vandalism or looting 16.
Number of citations issued in cases of documented vandalism or looting 17 Nu mber of prosecutions in cases of docu m ented vandalis m or looting (N OTE: for each prosecution please complete the erv Inmad LO OT Clearinghouse sua aary fora and send it i
along with the completed FY 1988 questionnaire) 18.
Number of misdemeanor convictions under ARP A 19 Number of felony convictions under AR P A 20 Number of second ARP A offenses (N O TE: included in quanHnns 18 and 19) 21.
Number of cases of documented vandalism or looting of archeologicalproperty that were prosecuted using an authority other than A RP A (NOTE: list @ecific authority and cases in which they were used under Caveats section) l 22.
A m ount collected in criminal fines I
under ARP A l
l Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 Questionnaire, Page 4
.o.
23 Number of civilpenalties applied (NOTE: as permitted by Sec. 7 of ARP A or other authorities) 24.
A m ount collected in civilpenalties under A R P A 25.
Costs for restoring or repairing archeological properties in cases in which civilpenalties have been assessed for violations of ARP A or other authorities 26.
A mount given in rewards under A R Pl.
(N OTE: as per aitted by Sec. Sa of A RP A) 27.
Com m eccial value of artifacts seized and retained by the govet nment under A RP A (NOTE: as permitted by Sec. 8b of ARPA) 28.
Com mercialvalue of property seized and retained by the governmentin ARP A convictions (N OTE: as per aitted by Sec. Sb of A R P A) 29.
A m ount spent on law enforce m ent for archeologicalresource protection S
30.
Percent of the overallcost of law enforec ment associated directly with archeological resource protection Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Enforce ment Data Narrative Quaseines (address on separate sheet) 31.
Please describe effective cooperative projects, methods, and/or techniques that your agency has used to improve ARP A enforce ment. Exa mples might include the 1
use of remote sensing equipment for monitoring site locations, or interagency
]
cooperative agreements for combined surveillance of adjacent land units and concurrentjurisdiction oflaw enforcement personnel.
Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 Quma*4nnnaire, Page 5 l
32.
What actions are planned or underway concerning the recent amendment to ARP A (P.L. 96-95) requiring agencies to develop documents for reporting suspected violations of ARPA and establishing procedures concerning when and how these documents are to be completed by officers, e mployees, and agents of their respective agencies?
33 Recent amendments to ARP A (P.L. 96-95) require Federal agencies to establish a program to increase public awareness of the significance of the archeological resources located on public lands and Indian lands and the need to protect such resources and to submit an annual report to Congress on the results of these activities. What actions are planned or underway concerning these amendments?
D. Archeological Resources Protection Education / Training This section collects information on the extent to which agencies made their archaeologists, law enforcement personnel other cultural resource personnel managers and field personnel aware of archeological resource protection during FY 1988.
Nu m ber 34.
Numbet and percent of law enforcement personneltaking Federal Law Enforcement Training Center course (FLETC) or other comparable 40 hour4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> course on archeological resource protection
(
%)
35.
Number and percent of archaeologists and other cultural resource parsonnel taking FLETC or other comparable 40 hour4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> course on archeological resoucce protection
(
%)
36 Number of other personnel (managers, field personnel etc) taking PLETC or other comparable 40 hour4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> course on archeological resource protection 37.
Number and percent of law enforce ment personnel taking other courses or portions of courses (8-16 hours) on archeological resource protection
(
%)
38.
Number and percent of archaeologists and other cultural resource personnel taking other courses or portions of courses (8-16 hours) on archeologicalresource protection
(
%)
l 1
___-.________m.-
o 39.
Number of other personnel (managers, field personnel, etc) taking other courses or portions of courses on archeological resource protection 1
l-Caveatas Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Education / Training Data l
l Narrative QuanHart (address on separate sheet) 40.
P1. ease describe any training courses used for archeological resource protection training or generai training in archeology. Include training other than the FLETC course on ARP A enforcement, the NPS 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> course on archeological resources protection, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation course on Section 106 procedures. In addition, feel free to offer opinions concerning what training would be usefuL Be as specific as possible.
I t
l E. Identification and Evaluation Investigations This section provides data for estimating the effort put into identification and evaluation investigations by agencies, land use applicants, or contractors working for agencies during FY 1988.
Nu m ber 41.
Number of overviews, inventories or literature / map searches associated with general planning activities or undertakings for the purpose of identifying archeological properties (N OTE: ramn1Hrsg in a letter to the films, a report, or another type of written product to docuaentits rami 1*=. Include activities conducted by the agency, under contract, or by land use applicants)
Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 QuanHarinaire, Page 7 i
L 42.
Number of agency FTEs used for overviews, inventories or literature /m ap searches 43.
A mount expended by agency for overviews, inventories or literature / map searches (N OTE: include sehry and benefit costs, l
support costs, and contract costa 0 1'
l 44.
Number of overviews, inventories or literature /
' map searches conducted by land use applicants and the estimated amount expended S
45.
Number of field studies to identify and evaluate archeological properties (NOTE: include those conducted by the agency, under contract, or by land use applicantd 46.
Number of agency PTEs used for identifying and evaluating archeologicalproperties 47.
Amount expended by agency for identifying and evaluating archeological properties (N OTE: include salary and benefit costs, support costs, and contract costa) 48.
Number of field studies to identify and evaluate archeologicalproperties conducted by land use applicants and the estimated a mount expended S
49.
Number of acres inspected by identification and evaluation investigations 50.
Number of archeologicalsites newly identified Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Identification and Evaluation Data 1
Federal Archeolog" Report-FY 1988 Questionnaire, Page 8
i Narrative Queadon (address on separate sheet) 51.
Recent amend ments to the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (P.L. 96-95) require Federal agencies to develop plans for surveying lands under their control to l
determine the nature and extent of archeological 1 resources and to prepare a schedule for surveying lands that are likely to contain the most scientifically valuable archeologicairesources. What actions are planned or underway concerning these amendments?
F.
Data Recovery This section provides data for estimating the effort devoted to data recovery projects during FY 1988 Number 52.
Number of data recovery projects which included compliance related archeological data recovery (NOTE: compliance data recovery projects are defined to be investigations designed to mitigate an adverse ispect or to achieve a determination of "no adverse" effect, Sec. 106. Include data recovery projects conducted by agency, under contract, or by land use applicants) 53.
Number of agency FTEs used for compliance data recovery 54.
Amount expended for compliance related data recovery (N OTE: include salary and benefit casts,
+L costs, and contract costsi)
S 55.
Number of compliance related data recovery projects conducted by land use applicants and the estimated amount expended S
Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 Queadonnaare, Page 9
r-56.
Number of data recovery projects unrelated to Section 106 compliance. (NOTE: this categocy would include data recovery associated with site pehh1 foc eahhnation, site protection for law enforcement, interpretation, collection of banaline data, specific research questions and/oc any other categacy of data recovery not directly related to Section 106 compliance. Include those conducted by agency, under <mntract, oc by land use applicantd 57.
Number of agency FTEs used for data recovery not associated with compliance 58 A mount expended by agency for data recovery unrelated to compliance (NOTE: include salary and benefit costs, support costs, and contract comba) 59.
Number of data recovery projects not associated with compliance conducted by land use applicants and the estimated a mount expended S
Caveats Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Data Recovery Data Narrative Question (address on separate sheet) 60.
Describe com munication, cooperation, and exchange between private individuals having collections of archeological resources and data (obtained before enactment of A RP A), professional archaeologists, and associations of professional archaeologists.
Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 QuM= amire, Page 10
G. Unanticipated Discoveries This section provides data for estimating the extent to which archeological properties are discovered unexpectedly during the imple mentation of an undertaking subsequent to completion of the Section 106 review and compliance process during FY 1988.
Number 61.
Subsequent to Section 106 compliance, number of agency undertakings resulting in the discovery of unanticipated archeological resources 62.
Number of unanticipated discovery situations where the resources were judged important enough for data collection to be conducted or design changes made to avoid them 63.
Number of agency FTEc used for unanticipated discoveries 64 Amount expended by agency for unanticipated discoveries (NOTE: include salary and benefit costs, support costs, and contract ment S
65.
Number of unanticipated discoveries handled by land use applicants and the estim ated amount expended S
Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Unanticipated Discoveries Data Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 QuamHnennaire, Page 11 i
i H. Estimating the Federal Archeological Resource Base This section provides baseline infor m ation about the extent of archeological resources within the lands managed by Federalagencies and the quality of our knowledge about the m. It is recognized that the questions below call for estim ates. ' We ask agency specialists to make the best estim ates possible through FY 1988 and write any caveats concerning them in the space provided.
Number 66.
Total acres managed 67.
Total acres and percent investigated sufficiently to identify 100 % of the archeologicalproperties (N OTE: 1.e. investigated at an appropriate levelof intensity tu eliminate the need for further syste aatic inventory)
(
%)
68 Total acres and percent investigated to identify less than 100 % of the archeological properties
(
%)
69.
Total acres and percent not investigated (N O TE: this should equal the total acreege indicated in question 66 minus acres marveyed reported in quaaHrum 67-68)
(
%)
70.
Totalnumber of known archeological properties on land managed 71.
Estimate of the totalnumber of archeological properties on land managed (NOTE: 1.e. nu a ber of archeotnaic=I mtma that may actual!y exist.
Include known sitte) 72 Number and perc6nt of the total known archeologicalproperties listed on the National Register Of Historic Places (N R H P) (N O TE: quanHnns 72-76
{
should sua to 100 %)
(
%)
J 73.
Number and percent of total known archeological properties determined eligible for the N RH P by the Keeper or considered eligible through documented consultation with the SH PO
(
%)
Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 Qua=Hannaire, Page 12
74 Number and percent of the total known archeologicalproperties adequately evaluated,
. but not listed, considered, or for m ally deter mined eligible (NOTE: 1.e., fitting neither quMnas 73 or 73 -
(
g) 75.
Nu mber and percent of the total known archeological properties deter mined ineligible for the NRHP by the Keeper or through documented consultation with the SHPO
(
%)
76.
Nu mber and percent of the total known archeological properties not evaluated
(
%)
Caveats: Analysis, Interpretation, or Clarification of Archeological Resource Base Data I
Narrative QuMart Suggestions for improving FY 1989 questionnaire.
Federal Archeology Report-FY 1988 Quas*4artnaire, Page 13
88 I
Ot i
i p.
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE l
ARCHEOLOGICAL ASSISTANCE DIVISION 1
Listing Of Outlaw Treachery (LOOT)
Clearinghouse Case Summary I. Agency:
- 2. Region:
- 3. State
.t. Location:
i
- 5. Defendant (s):
(When indicating dates, please indicate year, month and date for example: May 25,1985) 6.
Incident (date):
7.
Arrest (date):
8.
Indictment (date):
9.
Information (date):
10.
Hearing (date):
i 11.
Trial (date):
12.
Ples/ Guilty or Not Guilty:
(include date):
13.
Judgment:
(include date):
14.
Sentence:
(include date):
15.
Forefeiture:
(indicate amount in dollars, and/or list items):
i 16.
Fine:
J l
17.
Contact:
i i
IN; Phone:
19.' Narrative Summary:
I Information provided by:
name:
agency /omee:
address:
phone:
Date summary sheet filled out:
9 FEDERAL ARCHEOLOGY: THE CURRENT PROGRAM J
ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE FEDERAL ARCHEOLOGY PROGRAM FY 1985 AND FY 1986 l
gear,
4 Q
l l
lN 5
m 6
- lp,,
,e l
l DEPARTMENTAL CONSULTING ARCHAEOLOGIST ARCHEOLOGICAL ASSISTANCE DIVISION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON, D.C.
REVIEW DRAFT October 1988 I
H
. a y, i
FEDER AL ARCEROLOGY: THE CURRENT PROGR AM C O N TE N TS page TABLE OF CONTENTS i
LIST OF TABLES iv LIST O F FIG U R ES v
AC E R O W LE D G E M EN TS vi C H A PTE R 1. IN TR O D U C TIO N 1-1 Authority 1-1 Report Goals 1-1 Reporting HitMory 1-2 Data Collection and Analynis - FY 1985 and FY 1986 1-4 Report Organization 1-8 C E APTER 2.
TER FEDERAL ARCEROLOGY PROGRAN 2-1 Introduction -
2-1 Historical Background and Development 2-1 Current Program - Function and Responsibilities 2-8 C H APTER 3.
FED AR AL ARCEROLOGIC AL IEVESTIG ATIO NS AND STU DIES 3-1 Federal Archeological Per mits 3-1 Permits - FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-1 Permit Comparison - FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-4 l
Permit Monitoring and Coordination - F Y L986 3-4 Identification and Evaluation Activities 3-5 Literature Review and Field Survey - FY 1985 3-6 i
o8 page Literature Review and Field Survey - FY 1986 3-6 Comparison of Identification and Evaluation - FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-8 Data Recovery Activities 3-9 Data Recovery Activities-FY 1985 3-9 Data Recovery Activitieb - FY 1986 3-9 Comparison of Data Recovery Activities - FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-11 Unanticipated Discoveries 3-12 Unanticipated Discoveries - FY 1985 3-12 Unanticipated Discoveries - FY 1986 3-14 Comparison of Unanticipated Discoveries - FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-14 Cc% Sum mary and Comparison - FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-14 Cost Sua a ary - FY 1985 3-14 Cost Su a aary - FY 1986 3-15 Cost Comparison - FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-15 C H APTER 4.
TER FEDER AL ARCEROLOGIC AL RESOURCE E ASE 4-1 Known Resources and ArcheologicalInventory 4-1 Automated Databases for Archeological Resource Management 4-3 Agency-Specific Databases 4-3 National Archeological Database (N A DB) 4-5 C H APTER 5.
ARCEROLOGIC AL LOOTING AED LAW EEFORCEMBET 5-1 Reported Loot 2ng and Vandalism 5-1 The Growing Problem of Archeological Looting 5-3 Methods Used to Improve Archeological 1 Site Preservation 5-6 Site Fencing, Patrols, and Other Surveillance 5-6 Education and Other Awareness Efforts 5-10 11
r g.
page Information Exchange - LOOT Clearinghouse 5-13 Federal Law Enforcement and Archeological Training 5-14 C H APTER 6.
IN TER A G EN C Y C O O PER ATIO N IN IN FO R N ATIO N EN C R ANGE AN D COOPER ATIO N NITE PRIVATE O R G A NIS ATIO NS 6-1 Agency-Specific Cooperation 6-1 Infor m ation Exchange - LE A P Clearinghouse 6-5 Information Exchange - Report Reviews 6-7 Cooperation with the Private Sector and Professional Orgarnzations 6-7 C E APTER 7.
M AIN T AININ G EFFE C TIVE N ESS A E D IN P R O VIN G FEDERAL ARCEROLOGY 7-1 Introduction 7-1 Federal Archeological Activities 7-1 Archeological 1 investigations and the Resource Base 7-2 The Problem of Looting and Vandalism 7-3 Information Exchange 7-3 Actions by the Secretary of the Interior 7-5 Recoa mendations for Congressional Action 7-8 CH APTER 8 REFERENCES CITED 8-1 APPEN DIX A.
Q UESTIO NN AIRE D ATA FY 1985 AND FY 1986 - SPREADSHEETS (TABLES A.1-A.13)
A-1 A PPE N DIX B.
Q UESTIO EN AIRES FY 1985 AND FY 1986 B-1 I
iii f
f).,,
LIST O F T ABLES 1
page Table 1.1 Description of Data Categories.
1-3 Table 1.2 Response to FY 1985 and FY 1986 Questionnaire.
1-5 Table 1.3 Department / Agency Abbreviations Used in Report.
1-6 Table 2.1 Legislation, Rules, and Policies, FY 1985 and FY 1986.
2-4 Table 3.1 Permit Activities, FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-2 Table 3.2 Identification and Evaluation Activities, FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-7 Table 3.3 Data Recovery Activities, FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-10 Table 3.4 Unanticipated Discoveries, FY 1985 and FY 1986.
3-13 Table 3.5 Estimated Cost for Activities Associated with the Federal Archeology Progra a, FY 1985 and FY 1986 3-16 Table 4.1 Archeological 1 Inventory, Acres Examined.
4-2 Table 5.1 Enforcement Activities, FY 1985 and FY 1986 5-2 Table 6.1 Federal Archeology Prograa reports submitted to professionaljournals for review.
6-8 T ABLES A.1 - A.13 LO C ATED IN APPEN DIX A Table A.1 Per mitting, FY 198 5.
A-1 Table A.2 Enforce aent, FY 1985.
A-11 Table A.3 Education, FY 1985.
A-23 Table A.4 Identification and Evaluation, FY 1985.
A-28 Table A.5 Data Recovery, FY 1985.
A-34 Table A.6 Unanticipated Discoveries, FY 1985.
A-40 Table A.7 Per mitting, FY 1986 A-48 Table A.8 Enforce m ent, FY 1986.
A-58 Table A.9 Education, FY 1986.
A-6B iv
1
, Ope i
Page Yabh A.10 Identification and Evaluation, FY 1986 A-72 a
Tabh A.l'1 Data Recovery, FY 1986.
g.g1 1
Table A.12 Unanticipated Discoveries, FY D86 A-95 I
Tabh A.13 Archeological Resource Base, FY D86.
g.99 1
l
)
i EJET OF FIG U RBS j
Figure 1.1 Percent of response to FY 1985 questionnaire.
17 Figure 1.2 Percent of response to FY 1986 questionnaire.
1-7 Figure 3.1 Percent of costs associated with the Federal 1
Archeology Program, FY 1985.
3 17 4
Figure 3.2 Percent of costs ammociated with the Federal Archeology Prograa, FY 1986 3 18 Figure 5.1.
I,ooting statistics, FY DI5 and FY DB6.
5.-5 v
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _