ML20235W054

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Outline Extracted from JW Roe 870202 Memo Re Minutes for Senior Contract Review Board Meeting 113 on 870129
ML20235W054
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/02/1987
From: Roe J
NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20235W048 List:
References
FOIA-87-388 NUDOCS 8710150563
Download: ML20235W054 (2)


Text

. _ _ _. _

s ..

(v; n u

x. -

. .. 1-

\

-0UTLINE-q

1. INTRODUCTION l u
2. TECHNICAL INTEGRATION CENTER (TIC)  :
a. BF.W Plant Safety Evaluation
b. Code Applicability 3'. EXPERIMENTS (0VERVIEW)
4. OTSG SEPARATE EFFECTS {
a. 0TSG Visual {
b. OTSG Low Pressure Segment Facility
c. OTSG Full Power
5. INTEGRAL SYSTEMS
a. UMCP 2x4 I
b. Improved Scaled Integral Facility (ISIF)  !
6. INTEGRAL SYSTEM TEST ANALYSIS / SUPPORT
a. IST Analysis

. 1

b. IST Instrumentation and Facility Support

/J0TE: These two pages extracted from a February 2,1987,  !

memorandum to Multiple Addressees from Jack W. Roe, i subject: " Minutes for Senior Contract Review Board (SCRB) Meeting #113 - January 29, 1987."

The memorandum and all other attachments to this memodonotfallwithinthescopeofrequestJ l

\

e, 8710150563 871014 PDR h0LL 3RR d/

i .:'.

+

. Q o. ;s: 1, l

)* .2 a. B&W Plant 1 Safety' Evaluation - (Under FIN A6328) .

i

! l Determine relative demands:of repre-h Objectives: l(1) sentative PWRs on' safety systems and L

L> operators L (2) Determine-if major differences are D included in PRAs' and'1f risk significant (3) Demonstrate operational' TIC. capability involving appropriate disciplines for:

issue resolution , ,

J Approach:

(1) Evaluate transient response of Oconee-(B&W),.

' Calvert Cliffs (CE), and H. B. Robinson-(W)-

'(2) SBLOCAr Steam line break and feedwater 1 line break transients analyzed' {

(3) Each transient assessed;using 1 (a) RELAP5 - T/H characteristics (b) Critical'. safety function' response trees -

alternate means for safe response (c)Operatorreliability l Products: (1) Supply plant comparison results to NRR by 4/87 l Ability to perform Follow-on analyses as needed (2) to evaluate:

(a) B&WQG recommendations (b) NRR recommendations (c) Other LWR safety issues not included in B&W reassessment I c .

l '

3 u

1