ML20235V354

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Suppls Util 870403 Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/87-02.Corrective Actions:Overall Security/Plant Communications Improved by Requiring Officer to Rept Directly to Shift Supervisor During Emergency
ML20235V354
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 10/05/1987
From: Andognini G
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
GCA-87-608, NUDOCS 8710150104
Download: ML20235V354 (2)


Text

- . - - - - --

.. l.. , .2 M . . RECEIVED oWSMUD SACRAMFNTO MUNICIPAL UTluTY DISTRICT O P. O. Box 15830, Sacramento C nee y g-1830, (916) 452-3211 i

AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM SERVI HEMTAFQQORNIA s

~GCA 87-608

.i

'U.-'S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

' Attn: J. B. Martin, Regional Administrator Region V' 0ffice of Inspection and Enforcement

'1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Halnut Creek, CA 94596 f DOCKET NO. 50-312 l

RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION L

LICENSE NO. DPR i ADDITIONAL RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIDIATION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO.

! 50-312/87-02) l

Dear Mr. Martin:

By letter' dated March 3, 1987, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a Notice of Violation concerning activities at the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating 4 Station. The. District responded to the Notice of Violation by letter, dated April 3,1987. The response letter acknowledged the violation cited and described the District's intended corrective actions for each specific item list,ed in the Notice of Violation.

On June 24, 1987, Mr. Ross Scarano of the Commission requested the District to provide further clarification of our April 3,1987, response regarding the actions that have been taken by Security to enhance communication with plant i management. 1 The District has thoroughly evaluated the communication breakdown during the December 30, 1986 bomb threat, and has determined that Security's failure to fully inform plant management of the degree of activation of the Security Plan was a random personnel error and not of a recurring nature. The responsible security officer has since terminated employment at the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station. i Security Contingency Procedures for both a bomb threat and declaration of a security alert clearly require prompt and complete notification of the shift supervisor. Training on these procedures is an inherent part of the Security Officer Training Program.

~

0710150104 871005 PDR ADOCK 05000312 O PM ,

'(O 3FOl RANCHO SECo NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION O 1444o Twin Citics Road, Her.ald, CA 95638-9799;(209) 333 2935

o wc ;; , - ,1

.cr

GCA 87-608:

l-

'J.B. Martin 1,

-:2 - )

q j

W The-District has improved.overall Security / Plant ' communications by requiring

, )

an officer.to report directly to the Shift Supervisor during an emergency to, j

' function as a communication link with the Hatch Commantier and Central and' 1 1

i _ Secondary Alarm Stations. This facilitates the prompt' and complete transmittal -l a of. information between Security and the Plant. -

. . . 1 J .- The District considers that the'above actions adequately address this matter. {

If you should have additional questions, please contact Nr. Ron-H. Colombo.at (91.6) 452-3211, extensior 4236.

)

Sincerely,

~ h-G. Carl Andognini /

-Chief Executive Officer,'

Nuclear 0 cc: G. Kalman, NRC, Bethesda ..

,A.'D'Angelo, NRC, Rancho Seco F. J..Hiraglia, NRR, Bethesda 9

I

(' i i

l l

-c ,