ML20235U126
| ML20235U126 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry |
| Issue date: | 10/07/1987 |
| From: | Harrison J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235U100 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-87-19, NUDOCS 8710130370 | |
| Download: ML20235U126 (1) | |
Text
-
NOTICE OF VIOLATION The Cleveland Electric Illuminating License No. NPF-58 Company As a result of the inspection conducted on August 31 through September 4,1987, and in accordance with 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C - General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions (1985), the following violation was identified:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by Perry Nuclear Power Plant Operational Quality Assurance Manual requires, in part, that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with approved procedures.
)
Contrary to the above:
1.
The licensee's responsible system engineer failed to review the following outstanding and late safety-related Repetitive Tasks (preventive maintenance) for safety significance and/or rescheduling of the tasks as required by Operations Manual Procedure PAP-0906, Revision 1:
1 No. 485003699 (General Maintenance checks on safety-related MCC),
No. R86004208 (Maintenance on 4.16KV ESF breaker),
No. R85000145 (Maintenance on safety-related limitorque valve).
]
I 1
2.
The licensee failed to ensure that a monthly review of Lifted Leads, Jumpers and Electrical Devices (LLJFD) Tag Order No.15-923, dated November 2,1985 was performed in the months of April, June and November, l
1986 and in the month of May 1987, as required by Operations Manual Procedure PAP-1402, Revision 4.
1 This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
l l
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or
)
explanation in reply, including for each violation:
(1)correctiveaction i
taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
hyW OCT 7 1987 1-Dated J. J. Harrison, Chief Engineering Branch l
Q188585$h G
i