ML20235T735
| ML20235T735 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 12/23/1987 |
| From: | Varley R BOSTON EDISON CO. |
| To: | Agnes P MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF |
| References | |
| CON-#189-8155 2.206, EPC87-988, NUDOCS 8903080448 | |
| Download: ML20235T735 (45) | |
Text
o
,g M unCKET NUMDER gg-p' ~C.2D(0) f.M png UTIL FAC, t
y 80 STONED 50N Emergency Operations Facihty
\\
Obesy Henghts f
Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360 y
[
p0 WW '
h Eff"k hy/
A\\
December 23, 1987 EPC87-988 DT M \\
Mr. Peter Agnes, Jr.
Commonwealth of MA Assistant Secretary of Public Safety One Ashburton Place - Room 2133 Boston, MA 02108
Dear Mr. Agnes:
By letter dated October 26, 1987 Boston Edison Company transmitted information to you in response to certain issues identified in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) August 4,1987 "Self-Initiated Review and Interim Finding for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station" (SIR).
The purpose of that letter was to provide inf.ormation for submission to. FEMA in an effort to facilitate FEMA's review of the resolution of th~e SIR issues.
He are now forwarding additional information in response to the FEMA SIR issues.
In particular, we are enclosing a copy of a report entitled " Reception Center Feasibility Analysis" dated December 22, 1987 which addresses subissue B.1 as identified in the " Boston Edison Company Action Plan and Schedule for Providing Assistance in Addressing FEMA Issues" dated September 17, 1987 (Boston Edison Action Plan).
In subissue B.1, FEMA stated that "a new reception center must be found to replace Hanover."
(Page 19 of SIR).
The Action Plan stated that an " evaluation of the feasibility of using two reception centersd would be undertaken.
(Page 12 of the Boston Edison Action Plan).
The enclosed report documents that analysis.
The analysis summarized in the enclosed report assesses the capability of the two reception centers designated by the Commonwealth -- Taunton State Hospital (Taunton) and Bridgewater State College (Bridgewater) -- to monitor the population for contamination in the Pilgrim plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ) in accordance with applicable federal guidance.
While the report addresses other aspects of reception center operations, the primary purpose of the analysis was to determine whether the objective of that guidance could be achieved using two, rather than three, reception centers.
The report also provides planned traffic routes o.ut of the EPZ and estimated i
travel times, and identifies traffic access and control points.
)
It is important to stress that the report does not purport to address the entire reception center planning process, but is instead only a. step in that As you know, Boston Edison is assisting the Commonwealth and local process.
governments in upgrading their plans and procedures and is confident that appropriate plans and procedures governing the operation of reception centers will be developed.
e903090448 B71223 y S0 $
ADOCK 0500 3
gDR g
MWJW EPC87-988 4
The analysis summarized in the attached report was conducted by planners provided by Boston Edison, in coordination with Taunton and Bridgewater officials, and concludes that the Taunton and Bridgewater facilities (with appropriate renovations and equipment procurement) have the capability of monitoring the requisite number of persons evacuating from the EPZ in the event of an emergency at Pilgrim.
Thus, the report addresses FEMA's concern that a third reception center be found to replace Hanover Hall.
Boston Edison will continue to work with town and facility officials to assure that appropriate plans and procedures gov'erning reception center operations are developed, and will provide whatever resources are necessary to support reception center operation.
He understand that, as stated in the Action Plan (page 12), the Commonwealth is continuing its review of the possibility of identifying a third reception center.
If those efforts result in the identification of such a center, Boston Edison will be pleased to cooperate in its implementation, including the procurement of necessary facilities and equipment, the development of necessary plans and procedures, and the training of personnel. While such implementation steps are being taken, the enclosed feasibility analysis demonstrates that the available two reception centers can adequately serve any emergency needs.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact either me or Albert Samano at (617) 747-0439.
Sincerely, Ronald A.
Staff Assistant to Sr. V.P. - Nuclear RAV/dlw ID#988 Attachment cc: R. Boulay - MCDA S. Varga - NRC R. Nessman - NRC NRC Region 1 Senior NRC Resident Inspector i
Hayor Richard Johnson - Taunton R. Spearin - C.D. Director - Taunton D. Canepa - Chairman - Board of Selectmen - Bridgewater D. Ford - C.D. Director - Bridgewater E. Meaney - Bridgewater State College Taunton State Hospit'al - Adm.inistrator 3
a G
0
~
s RECEPTION CENTER FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS Boston Edison Company December 22, 1987 I.
Introduction l
In the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) August 4, 1987 "Self-Initiated Review and Interim Finding for the Piigrim Nuclear Power l
Station", a number of issues were identified with respect to the state of 1
offsite emergency preparedness for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
~
(Pilgrim).
In Boston Edison Company's September 17, 1987 " Action Plan and Schedule for Providing Assistance in Addressing FEMA Issues", Boston Edjs'on' n
identified a number of discrete "subissues" which collectively comprise FEMA's Subissue B.1, in particular, stated that "a new reception center concerns.
must be found to replace Hanover." In response, the Action Plan stated that an " evaluation of the feasibility of using two reception centers" would be undertaken.
Boston Edison Action Plan at 12.
This report summarizes that analysis.
At the outset, it is important to clarify that the purpose of a reception center is to provide a location where monitoring, decontamination and registration of evacuees can be performed, rather than to provide long-term t
congregate care for the EPZ population. Accordingly, except for activities such as vehicle decontamination that can, if necessary, take place during the i
1 l
l
recovery and reentry phase of an accident, a facility designated as a reception center will only be utilized for the relatively short period of time needed to monitor, decontaminate as necessary, and register evacuees.
Such a facility would not be used for longer-term needs (such as non-omergency medical care, temporary quartering, or other social services), which would be provided.by congregate care centers to which evacuees would be referred.
The principal purpose of this report is to assess the capability of Taunton State Hospital (Taunton) and Bridgewater State College (Bridgewater) to monitor the population evacuari,g from the Pilgrim plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ) in accordance with applicable federal guidance.
While the report summarizes the overall process of managing traffic and monitoring, registering and decontaminating evacuees, as described in greater depth in Appendix A to this report, the federal guidance provides that reception-centers should be capable of monitoring 201of the population evacuating from the EPZ in about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
Thus, the central purpose of the analysis is to evaluate the capability of the Bridgewater and Taunton facilities to achieve that objective.
The assessment was conducted by planners provided by Boston Edison, in coordination with Taunton State Hospital 'and Bridgewater State College officials, and those officials have concurred with the conclusions stated in this report.I The report also provides (in Attachment 2) preliminary results of traffic management analyses currently being undertaken by KLD Associates, I
Given the recent resignation of the Bridgewater State College President, Boston Edison is continuing to work with the current College administration in order to ensure that its views are reflected in any plans to utilize the College as a reception center.
4 2
[.
2nc., to assess, among other things, the ability of the road system outside the EPZ to accomodate the anticipated traffic to the two facilities, and thus I
to support timely monitoring of ev'acuees. provides planned traffic routes, estimated travel times and traffic management plans (including an identification of access and control points).
This report concludes that the Taunton and Bridgewater facilities have the capability to monitor persons evacuating from the EPZ in accordance with federal guidance, and that those facilities could effectively serve as reception centers.
In fact, although the federal guidance provides that there should be sufficient reception center capacity to monitor 20% of the population "tp hg evacuated" in an emergency, and an evacuation of the entire l
EPZ is extremely unlikely, the analysis shows that the Bridgewater and Taunton facilities can accomodate 20% of the entire EPZ population.
Thus, the analysis <was based upon conservative assumphxs.
l Facility renovation (principally at Taunton) and equipment procu ement for both facilities will be necessary. A listing of anticipated personnel, and resource needs is included as Appendix B.
In additien, the preliminary results of the traffic management analyses (Attachment 2) show that 4
anticipated traffic flow into Taunton and Bridgewater can be accommodated and that timely monitoring of evacuees at the reception centers can be supported.
The next section of this report describes the general analytical approach that was used in the evaluation.
Section III summarizes the analysis and results for Bridgewater and Section IV summarizes the analysis and results for Taunton.
Conclusions are presented in Section V.
1 l
9 O
3
II. Summary of Analvtical Acoroach i
The basic approach used to analyze both the Taunton and Bridgewater facilities was to first evaluate anticipated vehicle traffic flow to determine how and where vehicles would enter the reception centers, be monitored, be sorted into " clean" and contaminated parking areas, be decontaminated as I
.necessary, and exit.
The primary purpose of this aspect of the analysis was to assess whether vehicles could be processed in a manner that would achieve the goal of monitoring 20% of the evacuating population in about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
In other words, timely processing of~ vehicles will enable evacuee's to reach the personnel monitoring facilities and be monitored in a timely fashion.
Second, personnel traffic flow was analyzed to determine how and where -
evacuees could tue monitored, decontaminated as necessary, registered, reunited with their family members, and returned. to their vehicles or buses for transhortationto'congregatecarecenterso/otherdestinations.
Finally, an effort was made to determine the approximate level of resources needed to monitor evacuees consistent with the applicable federal guidance and to determine if the Taunton and Bridgewater facilities have the l
l capacity to permit effective use of the personnel and equipment needed to support reception center operations.
Resource lists (e.g., personnel, equipment and supplies and facility improvements) for both facilities are contained in Appendix 8.
l l
4
III. Bridaewater Analysis For purposes of the analysis, approximately 11,000 persons were estimated to arrive at the Bridgewater facility.
This number (when combined with the estimate for Taunton) represents 20% of the estimated peak summer, weekend EPZ population of 108,000 as described in Attachment 1 to this Report (Letter, Reuben E. Goldblatt, P.E., KLD Associates, Inc. to Cherie Fuller, Boston
~
Edison Company, dated July 17', 1987).
Estimates of the maximum number of vehicles which reasonably could be expected to arrive at the Bridgewater facility were also derived from the peak, summer weekend figures contained in Attachment 1.
Thus, for Bridgewater, about 4,500 vehicles were estimated to arrive at the facility. -
Once these vehicles begin to arrive at Bridgewater, the first step in the reception, center operation.would be vehic1.e monitoring.
, The option considered in the analysis was to monitor vehicles along Roberts Road. (See Attachment 3).
Using about 12 two-person teams monitoring vehicles in " batches" of 12, and assuming a monitoring time of 2 minutes per car, monitoring of all 4,500 vehicles could be performed in about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, This analysis takes into consideration the time necessary for vehicles to advance through the monitoring stations and for periodic relief of monitoring personnel, as well as actual monitoring time.
More monitors could be added to facilitate even faster processing.
Since vehicles can be processed in 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> or less, timely arrival of evacuees at the Bridgewater personnel monitoring facility can be accomplished.
i l
1 5
Once the vehicles are monitored, contaminated vehicles would be directed to the Bridgewater Field House parking lot or td the athletic fields adjacent to the Field House lot.
There is ample parking capacity at these locations, and perforated steel plate (PSP) will be provided to assure that the athletic fields' remain usable in inclement weather.
Transportation of evacuees from contaminated cars in the Field House parking lot to the Kelly Gymnasium (about one mile) for monitoring, decontamination as necessary, and registration could generally be accomplished using two 47-passenger buses and a third as a back-up.
Since vehicle decontamination need not be perfn7med immediately, that operation could be accomplished during the recovery phase of an emergency or as decontamination teams become available.
Chemically impregnated dry wipin'g cloths would be used to reduce liquid waste.
Uncontaminated. vehicles would be directed to the Great Hill commuter lot.
where there is ample parking capacity as well..
In inclement weather, additional buses would be used to transport evacuees from uncontaminated cars to the Kelly Gymnasium (about one mile driving distance or 1,500 feet walking distance).
Handicapped persons whose cars are contaminated would be directed to the Field House lot as well and could be transported to the proposed monitoring facility (Kelly Gymnasium Building) by bus or lift-van.
Those handicapped persons whose cars are not contaminated would be directed to the parking lot adjacent to the Kelly Gymnasium Building.
G 6
The Kelly Gymnasium Building is an ideal facility in which to monitor the evacuees as well as to perform the related functions of decontamination and registration.
It provides ample space for evacuees who are waiting to be monitored or who have completed registration and are waiting for others to be processed.
Persons would enter the ' Building at the northeast corner, ground level.
Monitoring and decontamination would occur in the large gym on the first floor.
(See Attachments 4 and 5).
To accomplish the monitoring of about 11,000 evacuees in about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> would require approximately five portal monitors (resembling airport metal detectors) operated by five, three-person monitoring teams, and one three person team for manual monitoring of handicapped persons.
About 180 evacuees per hour could be processed at each of the five monitors and 20 handicapped
~
persons per hour at the one manual station.
Sufficient space is available for additional monitors to facilitate even faster processing.
After passing through the monitor stations, uncontaminated evacuees would proceed to the small gym for registration.
i After monitoring, those persons who are contaminated could be separated according to sax and would proceed directly to the appropriate locker room.
Here they would wash and/or shower to remove the contamination and be remonitored to verify that the contamination has been removed.
They would then be given replacement clothing (prestaged at Bridgewater), as needed, and proceed through the locker room and past the laundry to the stairs leading to the small gym for registration.
Contaminated handicapped persons would be decontaminated at the facility or, as necessary, transported to a local hospital (qualified pursuant to applicable federal guidance) for decontamination.
Bladders will be procured for the collection of cor.taminated shower water.
7
i Once registration 'is complete, persons could be reunited with family I
memb'ers and would be permitted to leave in uncontaminated vehicles or buses to I
be provided, in order to go to private locations or congregate care centers.
Thus, monitoring of evacuees at Bridgewater can be accomplished in accordance with applicable federal guidance and, with the procurement of
\\
necessary equipment, the facility can effectively serve as a reception center.
Boston Edison will continue to work with responsible officials to assure that appropriate plans and procedures governing reception center operations are developed and will provide the resources necessary to assure that they can be effectively implemented.
IV. Taunton Analysis For purposes of the analysis, approximately 10,500 persons were estima-ted i
to arr.ive a't the Taunton facility.
This number, like that for Bridgewater, 1
was derived from the estimated peak, summer weekend EPZ population figures contained in Attachment 1, and (when combined with the estimate for Bridgewater) represents 20% of the total EPZ population.
Estimates of the maximum number of vehicles which reasonably could be expected to arrive at the Taunton facility were also derived from the peak, summer weekend figures contained in Attachment 1.
Thus, for Taunton, about 4,400 vehicles were estimated to arrive at the facility.
Once these vehicles arrive at Taunton, the first step in the reception center operation would-be to monitor the cars for contamination.
l
)
8 l
4
i Vehicles containing handicapped persons would be permitted to exit the main vehicle line to allow easy access for such persons to enter the facility 1
for monitoring and decontamination.
These. vehicles would be directed to proceed directly to the Brown Building where personnel monitoring and 3
decontamination could take place.
Once handicapped persons leave their cars, the cars would be brought back into line for vehicle monitoring.
Vehicle monitoring would take place along Hurray Road, using 12 two-person teams monitoring vehicles in " batches" of 12.
(See Attachment 6): Assuming a monitoring time of 2 minutes per car, monitoring of all 4,400 vehicles could be performed in about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
This analysis takes into consideration the time necessary for vehicles to advance through the monitoring stations and for periodic relief of monitoring personnel, as well as actual monitoring time.-
t Hore monitors could be added to facilitate even faster processing.
Since veh.icles can be processed in 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> or less, timely. arrival of evacuees at the Taunton personnel monitoring facility can be accomplished.
l Once the vehicles are monitored, contaminated vehicles would be directed
'1 to the parking lot between Murray Road and Chambers Road and, as necessary, to the adjacent grassy area.
There is ample parking capacity at these locations, and PSP will be prov.ided to assure that the grassy area remains usable in inclement weather.
Uncontaminated vehicles would be directed to the large lot across from the infirmary and to a flat grassy area on the Murray Road extension.
This area too would be rendered usable in inclement weather as necessary. Numerous additional spaces are available around the Taunton State Hospital grounds.
J e
9 ie
Since vehicle decontamination need not be performed immediately, that l
operation could be accomplished during the recovery phase of an emergency or l
as decontamination teams became available. C,hemically impregnattJ dry wiping cloth would be used to reduce liquid waste.
Once the vehicles are parked, persons would walk to the Brown Building (approximately 100 yards), entering at the northeast corner, first floor entrance for monitoring and, as necessary, decontamination.
(See Attachment 7).
Male evacuees would be monitored on the third floor using two portal monitors.
(See Attachment 8). Uncontaminated males would then proceed to the Dormitory area for registration and then down to the first floor.
Persons who are contaminated would proceed to the shower facilities.
Here, they would wash and/or shower to remove the contamination and be remonitored to verify-that the contamination has been removed.
Contaminated males would proceed from the portal monitors to the decontamination area and then through secondary monitoring.
After these persons have been decontaminated, and replacement clothing (which will be prestaged at Taunton) issued, they would proceed to registration and then down to the first floor. A similar process would be used for women and small children on the second floor of the Brown Building using three portal monitors.
Bladders will be provided to collect l
contaminated shower water.
(See Attachment 9).
{
At Taunton, handicapped persons would be monitored at one manual monitoring station located on the first floor of the Brown Building.
Those who might be contaminated would be decontaminated at the facility or, as necessary, transported to a local hospital (qualified pursuant to applicable federal guidance) for decontamination.
Those who are not contaminated would I
10 ei
join the general evacuee population on the first floor for registration, and a final registration check.
Persons could then be reunited with family members
~
and would be permitted to leave in uncontaminated vehicles or buses to be provided, in order to go to private locations or congregate care centers.
The Brown Building is adequate to accommodate the monitoring function and the related activities of decontamination and registration.
Ample space is available for evacuees who are waiting to be monitored or who have completed registration and are waiting for others to be processed.
Facility renovations will be required (See Appendix B).
To monitor 10,500 evacuees in about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> would require approximately five portal monitors, operated by five, three-person monitoring teams and one three-person monitoring team for manual monitoring of handicapped persons. -
About 180 evacuees per hour could be processed at each of the five monitors and 20 handicapped, persons per hour.at the manual station.
Sufficient, space is available for additi'onal monitors to facilitate even faster processing.
After passing through the monitor stations, uncontaminated persons would proceed to registration.
Thus, monitoring of evacuees can be accomplished in accordance with applicable federal guidance and, with the procurement of necessary equipment A
and facility upgrading, Taunton can effectively serve as a reception center.
Boston Edison will continue to work with responsible officials to assure that appropriate plans and procedures governing reception center operations are developed and will provide the resources necessary to assure that they can be I
J 1
effectively implemented.
I 4
l 11 l
1
V.
Conclusion The abcVe analyses shows that the Bridgewater and Taunton facilities can, l
with appropriate planning, equipment procurement and (principally at Taunton) l
-facility renovation, support timely monitoring of persons evacuating from the EPZ and that the two facilities can effectively serve as the reception centers for the EPZ population.
l 6
e e
e i
4
?
t 4
12
"^ ' - ' ' - - -
l
=
l List of Accendices and Attachments 1
Appendix A -
Regulatory Guidance Governing the Feasibility Analysis.
Appendix B -
Lists of anticipated personnel and prestaged resources for l
Bridgewater State College and Taunton State Hospital. - Letter, Reuben E. Goldblatt, P.E., KLD Associates, Inc. to Cherie Fuller, Boston Edison Company, dated July 17, 1987. - Letter, Reuben E. Goldblatt, P.E., KLD Associates, Inc. to Albert Samano, Boston Edison Company, dated December 10, 1987 1
i (and attached exhibits).
) - Bridgewater State College Reception Center Area Vehicular Traffic flow. - Bridgewater State College Kelly Gymnasium Building Ground Floor Plan.
i
- - Bridgewater State College Kelly Gymnasium Building First Floor Plan. - Taunton State Hospital Reception Center Layout Vehicular Traffic Flow. - Taunton State Hospital Reception Center Layout First Floor Plan.
~ - Taunton State Hospital Reception Center Layout Third Floor Plan.
, - Taunton State Hospital Reception Center Layout Second Floor Plan.
i S
13
I APPENDIX A 1
Reaulatorv Guidance Governina the Feasibility Analvsis 1
NRC and FEMA regulations (10 CFR Section 50.47(b)(10) and 44 CFR 350.5(a)(10) in particular) require that:
l
\\
A. range of protective actions... [be] developed for the plume exposu pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public.
NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Rev.1 (November 1980), " Criteria for Pre Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness i
h
- Support of Nuclear Power Plants" (NUREG-0654) Evaluation Criter Each organization shall describe the means for re of evacuees at relocation centers in host areas. gistering and monitoring period all residents and transients in the plum The personnel and relocation' centers.
The operative FEMA guidance interpreting Evaluation Criterion J 1 December 24, 1985 Memorandum from Richard H. Krim, Assistant Associate Director, State and Local Programs and Support, FEMA to NTH Oivi Regional Offices (Krim Memorandum).
The Krim Memorandum addresses the
" percentage of... evacuees that could reasonably be expected t o arrive at relocation center (s)."
Krim Memorandum at p.l.
Since FEMA's experience with "a variety of natural and technological emergencies" suggested th re from 3 to 20 percent of the evacuees arrived at relocation centers or shelters," the Krim Memorandum states that the percentage of potentia l
1 l
A-1 1
l
evacuees for radiological emergencies may be closer to the upper end of the 3 to 20% range after taking into account the " fear" and uncertainty associated with a radiological omergency. Id.
Accordingly, it provides the following guidance:
The State and local radiological emergency preparedness plans should i
include provisions at relocation center (s) in the form of 20 cercent of the estimated cooulation to be evacuated _.
For highly improbable radiological releases involving high levels of radiation encompassing a relatively large area... ad hoc response measures [should be implemented.]
Id. at p.2 (emphasis added).
The analysi.s described in this report was conducted in accordance with this guidance.
I e
e y
e
(
G A-2
-' ~
~
APPENDIX B List of Anticipated Personnel and Prestaged Resources for Bridaewater State Colleae and Taunton State Hosoital*
I.
Bridaewater State Collece Ouantity A.
Personnel Traffic control (6)
Vehicle monitoring and decontamination (24)
Personnel monitoring and decontamination (28)
Registration (12)
Supervisory, other (3)
Transportation to congregate care facilities (10)
TOTAL (83) 8.
Prestaged Equipment and Supplies 4
Set up Kit (Herculite, masking tape, rad
^
waste disposal supplies, etc.)
(1)
Bladders (15,000 gallons) l (2) 1 Emergency diesel generator l
(1)
{
Emergency lighting for walkways (4)
Communications system upgrade 1
(1) l Perforated steel plate I
i Portal personnel monitors (5)
Manual monitoring equipment (3)
Vehicle monitors (12)
Personnel decontamination kits (2)
The estimates provided will be modified, as necessary, as the planning
'l process continues.
Estimates will also be developed in the planning process where no quantities have been provided.
B-1
AP@ENDIX B (continued)
Vehicle decontamination kits Replacement clothing (2,000)
Shoe covers (pairs)
(11.000)
B.
Equipment and Supplies (continued)
First Aid Kits i
Barricades and flashing lights (4)
Cones (24)
Assorted administrative supplies (e.g., registration forms, desks, chairs, etc.)
C.
Facility Renovations or Additions Seal Kelly Gymnasium shower floors and walls Installation of bladder and connections at Kelly Gymnasicm for collection of liquid radioactive' waste.
II. Taunton St' ate Hosoita'l Ouantity l
A.
Personnel Traffic control (7)
Vehicle monitoring and decontamination (24)
Vehicle parking (10)
Personnel monitoring and decontamination (18)
Registration (12)
Supervisory, other (4)
Transportation to congregate care facilities (7)
TOTAL (82)
~
e
1 APPENDIX B (continued)
B.
Prestaged Equipment and Supplies b
Bladders (15,000 gallons)
(2)
Emergency diesel generator (1)
Emergency. lighting for walkways as necessary (4)
Communications system upgrade (1)
Perforated steel plate Portal personnel monitors (5)
Manual monitoring equipment (3)
Vehicle monitors (12)
Personnel decontamination kits (2)
Vehicle decontamination kits Replacement clothing (1,500) 5 Shoe covers (' pairs)
(10,500)
First Aid Kits Barricades and flashing lights (7)
Cones (21)
Assorted administrative supplies (e.g., registration forms, desks, chairs, etc.)
C.
Facility Renovations or Additions (Brown Building) l-Repair roof and eaves Paint rooms, hallways, common areas Installation of showers (5) and sinks (5) on second and third floors 1
B-3
APPENDIX B (continued)
C.
Facility Renovations or Additions (Brown Building) (continued)
~
Repair sanitary facilities as necessary Installation of handicapped access sanitary facilities (2) on first floor Installation of handicapped access ramp (s) on first floor -
Installation of bladder and connections for collection of liquid radioactive waste.
1 I
l 9
a b
%)
f B-4 O
--m u w INCompoEATao
(
W S#cA0WAY Mumesmuewas ae A ium, nr 11i Wie **Han July 17, 1987 i
\\
VIA TELEFAX i
I
,Ms'. Cherie Fuller soston Edison Emergency Operations Facility Obery Neights i
Plymouth, MA 02340
Dear cherie:
In response to Boston Edison's requee't, we have developed estimates of the number of people and vehicles which any be expected at Bridgewater state Co11 eye and Taunton state as a protective action in response to an accident at Pilgria Station. The information presented is predicated upon the use o,
2 Reception Centers only. Assignments of communities within the !
EP2.to Reception Centers is as follows Bridaawater Stata callaea Plymouth (North of Summer Street)
Marshfield l
Duxbury Kingston Taunton Stata Meanital Plymouth (South of Summer Street)
Carver The number of vehicles which may be expected to arrive at sach Reception Center is based upon the FEMA Guidelines which state that 20 percent of vehicles assigned to a Reception Center will actually arrive at that center.
l l
l a
e emRFy BF, 1947 Since both Taunton, and Bridgewater are suffici Reception Centers should not increase t ently outait the evacuate the EP2.
red to t
If you have questions regarding this material a call.
, please give I
very truly yorrs, RBG/rg Encl.
'Reuben R Go1@latt, P.R.
sr. systems Analyst 4'-
e o
e d
e i
i e
I e
j e
4 e
o
. 7_.
l 5
$ i E'
q!
l 5...__Ji!.
i l E-e jg Eh 1
a ti l A i !
2 i
g g_ a z
,e gI l -l 'I l !
j
~
m t
s i i !
3 6
l
~
3 i
I E i 5
4 I..
o g
(
r h
E I I E
~
E
.l I l l'
t t
l s
5 I l l ! !
I i
c z
e e t
5 n
n g
g l I i '!
1 1
I il ! i u
b e
li i
i i l! l ! I
G a.
- r. ~
E K
=
m.1
~
3 4
t t
e P
7 L
E n
n 1
L E
e E
3 i
L O
V p;
~
C Ds m
5 j"
iIj
~
m
=
A e
v I
n e
4 7
E 3
8 i
4
~'
T t
u '
N s
t A
s "
~
a s
~
T O
n mhS 8
.e S
S t
8 4
A a,
i t
R E
i n
E S
e 5
=
)
a T
n e
3
=
n3 9
7 A
F e
w s
S V
F m
E 0
w 8
w.3 G
O e
3 i
8
=
m.4
.e D
n I
I t
8 R
R A
4 4
N n
.I n.
E s
3 E
o O
C mv p
l 8
T 2
S u
z l
B D
4e8 t
2 I
E m
r G
0 i
4 I
n N
e 2
P
.i I
s s
5 a.
5 S
f r
0 S
E mvo 3
n 9
A K
1 n
4 t
E s
r.
4 I
S E
e t
5
- .n 2 mm
==34 m
4 E
V n
r 5
1 o
0 5
3 5
I i
f 3
T R
P 8
E I
s 5
8, v
r 9
=
4 N
M n
o 7
0 a
s 3
L U
e v
s 3
5 M-S w
s I
O w
t 3
i 8
.s 4
r 3
~
C e
a 3
r e
a 8
P i
F
!I ;
4 O
N rE O
Y I
~
T T
~
~
A 1
g, L
4
~
L Ug 3
O e
P g,,,,_, g=, g T
a" g
E e
~
t
~
P V
P v
~
O a
L r
A P
O
~
v A
~
T T
C U
O Fl.
ll T
i ii i gi!
il.
s
u u KLD ASSOCIATES I NCOR PO R ATED 300 Broadway i
Huntington Station, NY 11746 (516) 549-9803 December 10, 1987 Mr. Albert Samano, III Boston Edison Oceantown 59 Industrial Park Road Plymouth, MA 02360
Dear Albert:
As you know, a traffic management plan based upon the assumption that Bridgewater and Taunton will be used as reception centers is being prepared by KLD Associatas Inc. The work effort includes field studies, highway capacity analyses, and traffic routing. plans. Results of this effort will yield specific traffic management plans.which support reception center activities while, at the same time', providing continued access to host community q
facilities by local residents.
)
Preliminary analyses, to date, indicate that traffic flow into the Bridgewater and Taunton facilities will support the objective of monitoring persons arriving at those facilities within about a 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> period. It should be noted that these analyses indicate the presence of extensive traffic queues on approach roads to the facilities. These queues will be caused by the fact that the rate of vehicle monitoring at reception centers is likely to be lower than the lowest highway capacity along the approach routes. Traffic queuing will commence shortly after the first vehicles arrive for radiological monitoring and continue to build until about 7 or 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> after reception center activities commence when the last evacuating vehicle joins the queue. Thereafter, traffic queues will dissipate as queued vehicles are processed into reception centers. The queue should be completely dissipated by about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
This analysis has indicated that the primary focus of traffic management plans will be to manage the queue. Associated with this objective will be the assurance of continued access to all points within the host communities of emergency vehicles.
It i
l
Mr. Alb3rt Semano 2
Dacombar 10, 19B7 1
l should be noted that conversion of two way roads to multi-lane, one way flow the queue may,is not contemplated. Thus access to locations along a
be maintained by routing emergency vehicle in the direction opposite to the queued vehicles.
Route signs will be required for several purposes. First i
evacuees must be routed in the direction of the reception l
centers. Secondly, it is possible that some non-evacuating traffic will be intermixed with the evacuation flow in the area of the reception center. This traffic should be given an opportunity to divert from the evacuation routes prior to the monitoring locations.
It is also advisable to alert people in the host communities and along the evacuation routes of the presence of congested traffic conditions. It should be suggested that they refrain from making non-essential trips during the course of the evacuation.
The following exhibits are appended to this letter:
Exhibit T-1 Tau'nton Reception Center Approach Route Description Exhibit T-2 Taunton Reception Center Travel Time Estimates Tra5'91 Time Estimates From The EPZ Boundary Exhibit T-3 Summary of Traffic Control Points Supporting The Taunton Reception Center l
Exhibit T-4A Taunton Reception Center Traffic Control Points - Middleborough Exhibit T-4B. Taunton Reception Center Traffic Control Points - Raynham, Taunton I
e
Mr. Albart samano 3
Dacombor 10, 1987 Exhibit B-1 Bridgewater Reception Center Approach Route Descriptions Exhibit B-2 Bridgewater Reception Center Travel Time Estimates From The EPZ Boundary Exhibit B-3 Summary of Traffic Control Points Supporting the Bridgewater Reception Center Exhibit B-4 Bridgewater Reception Center Traffic Control Points - East 3ridgewater, Bridgewater very truly yours,
/,
Reuben Goldblatt,.P.E.
Systems Analyst RG/jmn Attachments a
O e
'd Exhibit T-1 Taunton Reception Center-Approach Route Descriptions Route'T1:
Take Route 3A south from the EPZ boundary to.the Sagamore Rotary.
Exit the rotary onto Cranberry Highway going west and continue west to Route 25/495.
Enter Route 25/495 going west and continue west to Route 138.
Turn left (south) onto Route 138 and continue south to West Britannia Street.
Turn right (west) onto West Britannia Street and continue' west to Danforth Street.
Turn left (south) onto Danforth Street and continue south to Taunton State Hospital.
Route T2:
Take Route 3 south from the EPZ boundary to the Sagamore Rotary.
Exit the rotary.onto Cranberry Highway going west and continue west to Route 25/495.
Enter Route 25/495 going west and continue west to Route 138.
Turn left (south)_onto Route-138 and continue south to West Britannia Street.
Turn right (west) onto West Britannia Street and continue west to Danforth Street.
Turn left (south) onto Danforth Street and continue south to Taunton State Hospital.
t Route T3:
Take Route 58 south from the EPZ boundary to Route 25/495.
Enter Route 25/495 going west and continue west to Route 138.
Turn left (south) onto Route 138 and continue south to West Britannia Street.
Turn right (west) onto West Britannia Street and continue west to Danforth Street.
Turn left (south) onto Danforth Street and continue south to Taunton State Hospital.
Route T4:
Take Route 44 west from the EPZ boundary to' Route 25/495.
Turn right (west) onto Route 25/495 and continue west to Route 138.
Turn left (south) onto Route 138 and continue-south to West Britannia Street. Turn right (west) onto West Britannia Street and continue west to Danforth Street.
Turn left (south) onto Danforth Street and continue south to Taunton State Hospital.
(
e e
-Exhibit T-2 Taunton Reception Center Travel Time Estimates from The EPZ Boundary Location at Distance-Boundary of Route To Along Rte Average Time EPZ Reception Center (Miles)
Speed (Hours)
- 1. Rte 3A at-Route 3A 1.7 10 mph 0.2 Southern EPZ Cranberry Highway S.9 10 mph 0.9 Boundary Route 25/495, 25.7 15 mph 1.7 Route 138, etc.
_112 10 mph 0.4 l
1 40.2 3.2
'2.
Rte 3 at Route 3 1.5 15 mph 0.1 Southern EPZ Cranberry Highway 8.9 10 mph 0.9 Boundary Route 25/495 25.7 15 mph 17 Route 138, etc.
121 10 mph 0.4 40.0 3.1 3.
Rte 58 at Route 58
'l.0 id sph 0.1 Southern EPZ Route 25/495 20.3 15 mph 1.4 Boundary Route 138 1x1 10 mph 0.4 25.2 1.9
- 4. Rte 44 at Route 44 8.7 10 mph 0.9 Western EPZ Route 25/495 7.5 15 mph
'O.5 Boundary Route 138, etc.
121 10 mph 0.4 20.1 1.8 Notes (1)
Average speeds along approach routes reflect congested flow conditions:
Limited access highways (Route 3, I-495) are conservatively assigned a speed of 15 mph; At-grade, two lane roads are assigned 10 mph.
e
1 I
i e
h I
aae
>E C 3J6 N -e N sw
.e =s.mo se
s =e =e se==.e
0=t 4W l o.
k 7me e e=
s EE mN N se N-..=
- a. =e =s en en e
.e 5OI 4 ".e tt E
e en t u e uO 4 k
=4 8
EU 0 as. es 4 OO OO OOOO OOOOOOO at 4e a w
at et t i
e-
>.r e
E e6 w
W E
U t
} O
M e I
EW I a=
EEe ca n C0 m000 00e0000
- e. - 4 O 4 w
ave W
w of E
O u e a=
== to 4 e
2 E tu e 2
EOI ae==
=e me se se as ese se O.me se me==.e e
4 4 e=
0 W
et 3 4 e
W E
t=
>9 E.
k 8
- em me $
em 4 N ee'se m N e
t=
ag 6 es e se N es N es as ar oa m O a=
4 e
em d &
t=
e6 e, 'l 3
M e
e m er
~
E E
t 4
=e e a E
w Q O e.
w E
4
-~
~~
- a. ~m, n o w.. O.e O
6 OO OO OOOO O O O O O== s=
E
.A en i e e e 8 0 e e e e e a e e e e 3
'i O
ua em 44 44g4 4444444 er e=
4 EE at a
= e= e= > > a= e= t= e= a= a
E l
0 0 e e e 8 8 8 8 4 4 0 4 0 t t 3
hp 4
d am O
O
.E.
~
em e
A w
e=
w E
W O
4 e
M
.J o
Z e
e tif E
4 e e>
W er oE ag 4
EO De W e e=
= to O M
E ua w
t= 4 m>
en E
W a
E M *=
e e 0
m wt eO w
t= > E E c
w t- =e e= > E H H O==
4 g
E t=
2.d EO e to E t= T ev Q
R
==.4 E E > er O W > W e4 to W
es
==
==
4== m O > > E E 4 ee w e to eE e= E t1. E
0=3 a
4 en me
== e > r 3 2EE%O3 d
Q tP se W4444 4 w en af E O 4
4 e3eO>
er er 4 4 4 g E
E uE
~
@ > E O af w
w ee eC000 3O in 3 at h? E E E E S000 9 e
E E E E e= *4 X
E3 O
e444 es u
40 af 3 O
4444E u
o t= g E
E 4 4 eg e.a e
e-
==
0
%4 4== =e me t= 4 e o e e O e=
er %
2E E mt=w> w> E m ed E9 40 e eg3g me > w > w 4 4
0 O s de PM M444E&W 4
O E
== 0 WW d =o se em a= to em M W
to e2 O
e=
4 a=====
g O e t= m F e= 4 40 WW W 'W W er.1r 4 O E w== W Q d.4 t=
==
I ue
> e=
> h=
to eeeu oFQE E==
Qt t33 33 3
4 O 4 O m sg 3 o
e
=e e
@OO Oe O e e e et O w o at 4==
0 s
3 er 4 1 et eg13SO E O E *= 0 E 4
O 8.e 4
E E
W 4
0
.6 I
>=
7 0 C
E 7
1 a Q
3 O f
==
4 4
E 4
em o
O N
N O
M M
M
.h p
gMg g
g glg ggh g
g 6
=
_ _ -um o
swa.
- Exhibit T-4A.
Taunton Reception Center - Tra#fic Cbntrol Doihts - Riddleborough s
f
~~
S[
W k
- e
- #i sR g
. p,
- s k
b,N 5
. h o, p{q c
T-ns-ol
?
/
c'
/
lw
- > gn
/
888
.!g s,
-M'"
'fh A
[
e
',7'
- f..qr **
lf j \\
K, t.
- d 3
(
1 W
y f t,
N
/ /'.,f l
i
\\
Q,
,4x Cr: 4Y'
,. u fc..
L, 7
' mp.
. ' s.
g.,
.m.
\\
s i
t g
'%y
'I,i "J [#
i
+1 7
,(e O
s i
[
-v
\\/
- a a
.rh "
h.~O.I
j g-
-- ~,.., -.s g
'729l
's.
g
'N,
~
[
[
i
- ,, N j.3
\\
/
e i
i j
~
.y i
\\
\\
j
=-
J
- ).
)
,/,,
7[
,, p 1-
~
//
~
, T-RA-01 N.
~
^
G
\\
(
N.-
\\
3
's t!
_ y) y
' ~ ~ '
I D
9 T-4
~ %,,
,f K
. $.V \\
/,
/
4q9
, /p RAYNHAM f N.
w
/
) o, c
. asu a) ;
T.,,-0, J
, ~ t.;',.?
s e
/
^
(
-y gg, l
= = -.
'\\
~
't -
'\\[
jq..
j i
. }-
i 1
T-TA-o2 g
, T-73 01
- sg ;,,.->
9 7
.,,:S I
A..
NL t
T TA-03 0
/N
(
. / Np i t
,"f_ l \\ '-
I
~~ * * '
u
,,J l-T-TA-04
,1,x.j. /
'N l/
I
'/
l ' - ^-
'\\
.T)'
- ~. \\
s
's
\\ f T=TA-05
,j,.
r'~%. '# g/ \\
i
'.:: - I e <
r 1
\\
D
(,'.-
g I)E.
/
L a :.
/ %
P'
.n" =h,,"
p k.0**L b.
- ~
i
/
N!
p g'
- f. \\,9
/
=
,,a'[-j-?
=
h T-TA-05
't h -
G
,,,, I / '.-
e g
3,ia
"/
/
,,g 1;
-a g
T-TA-08
' i h
'I'^ "
.:=
f
)\\
l\\
Qsf,-,. - 0. -l l ~.N.glh T
,......,-., J,.,
g y., ;,. -
1-c
--a...../-
s-
~,
~_
% M:
TAUNTON,.-
~
~
~
.i
\\l f D.=
- M:(
+
l T-TA-u c>
,. ' s L.,
l
.y L
r s
A f
s~ ~~ ~
/
~
~
- f,L w
L l
-.:=2
.N
..h.',s c
,J g,
Exhibit B-1 Bridgewater Reception Center Approach Route Descriptions Route B1:
Take Brook Street west from the EPZ boundary to C l h Road.
Turn right (west) o c ester west to Mayflower Road. Turn rightonto Colchester Road an continue and continue west to Route 58.
(West) and continue north to Route 106. Turn rightonto Mayflower R 58, (north) onto Route Route 106 and continue west to Route 104 Turn left (west) on East Street and proceed to Roberts Road Turn right onto Route B2_:
Take Route 106 west from the EPZ boundary to Rout right onto East Street and proceed to Roberts Road l
e 104.
Turn Route B3:
t Take Route 27 west from the EPZ boundary to Rout left (west)
Turn left (south)onto Route 14 and continue west to Rout e 14.
Turn Turn left (east)onto Route 18 and continua south.'to Rou 106.
i onto Route 106 and continue east to.
Roberts Road.
Route B4:
Take Route 53 north from the EPZ boundary to R left (west) onto Route 139 and continue west to Route 18 oute 139.
Turn Turn left (south)
Turn left (east)onto Route 18 and continue south to Rou 106.
onto Route 106 and continue east to Roberts Road.
Route BS:
Take Route 14 west from the EPZ boundary to R right (north) oute 53.
Turn Turn left (west)onto Route 53 and continue north to Route (south)onto Route 139 and continue west to Rou 18.
Turn left to Roberts Road. Turn left (east)onto Route 18 and co Route 106.
onto Route 106 and continue eas,t e
e L.,,.... _.. _.
Exhibit B-l'(Concluded)
Route B6:
Take Route 3 north'from the EPZ boundary to Route 18 left (south) onto Route 18 and continue south to Route 106.
Turn Turn left (east) onto Route 106 and continue east to Roberts Road.
Route B7:
Take Route 3A north from the EPZ boundary to Route 139.
left (west)
Turn Turn right (north)onto Route 139 and continue left to Route 3A.
123.
Turn left (west)onto Route 3A. and continue north to Route Route 139.
Turn right (west)onto Route 123 and continue west to onto Route 139 and continue west to Route 18.
continue south to Route 106. Turn left (south) onto Route 18 and and continue east to Roberts Road. Turn left (east) onto Route 106 Route B8:
Take Route 139, from the EPZ boundary, north then west to Route 18.
Turn left (south) onto Route 18-and' continue south to Route l'06.
Turn left (east) onto Route 106 and continue east to Roberts Road.
o
~
Exhibit 3-2 Bridgewater Reception Center Travel Time Estimates From the EPZ Boundary Location at Distance Boundary of Route To Along Rte Average Time EPZ Reception Center (Miles)
Speed (Hours)
- 1. Brook St. at Brook, Colchester, Western EPZ Mayflower, Boundary Route 58, 106 8.9 10 mph 0.9 2.
Rte 106'at Route 106 5.8 10 mph 0.6 Western EPZ Boundary
- 3. Rte. 27 at Route 27, 14, I
Western EPZ 18, 106 17.7 10 mph 1.8 Boundary 4.
Rte 53 at Route 53, 139, Northern EPZ 18, 106 Boundary 24.9 10 mph 2.5
- 5. Rte 14 at Route 14, 53, l
Northern EPZ 139, 18, 106 24.9 10 mph 2.5
' Boundary 6.
Rte 3 at Route 3 13.4 15 mph 0.9 Northern EPZ Route 18, 106 18.6 10 mph 1.9 l
Boundary 32.0 2.8 l
7.
Rte 3A at Route 3A, 139, Northe'rn EPZ 3A, 123, 139, i
Boundary 18, 106 35.7 10 mph 3.6
- 8. Rte 139 at Route 139, 18, Northern EPZ 106 31.3 10 mph 3.1 Boundary Notes (1)
Average speeds along approach routes reflect congested flow conditions:
Limited access highways (Route 3, I-495) are conservatively assigned a speed of 15 mph; At-grade, two lane roads are assigned 10 mph.
e e
a j
I wM 4 62 9 301
=* -e N O =*
N as m N =eme.4.eem
.=m N
semoCoo g,*==
6 1
og M e
)i J
e 2et l
me >= 0 ZZ t
=NO
Nam N======**=N er J t
==COcc g me g 34 8 M i i
W t vo0
.J
= 4 8 e
Evi 2
E= \\
00000 000 OC00000OOOO O00000 IJ d W I u er et i e= e' t
2 ei O
en dk V
f 4
== M l J
EW f w
&2 1 OOOCO OOO OOOOCOOOCOO OCOOOO at 40l l
et V i i
e >=
w l
3
=
W u
Q se W l
)
l O
E di f 1
I
==
EO$
0 se N em N ee me em O ** O =* O as O
- O =e se N se * =e se==
ef et== 0 e
og 3 0 9
W Z
6e e G
k l 2
t=
I se
== g-M g8
- N**
- * = = *
- NNeNmNmNmNN m se se se se se
- m. 8
=.
e GL es 0 3
t.o e
e M.
==
e I
2 l
u =
e s w
O C i l
c.
d e
== N m 4 M
== N m 4MeP=efmoasNmd M 4 h so 05 O 6
OOOOO OOO O O O O O O ** ** ** ** **
.A Q.
I 6 e a t a t t 4 s e i e e e I e ea f 8 a e e a e
====******N C
va eeeem 333 33333333333 332333 eg
>= 0 w w uJ w w eme art e e ao to e e 9 e m 9 ee9eec f
4 6 I t 4 4 6 4 6 9 4 6 4 0 t I t 8 6 0 e t 6 e e 2
i seede eme e e # 2 S e e e e m 80 e S e e e.0 O
e E
4 9=
4 M
m w
I U
2 O2 6.e
- =
==
==
3 e
e>
b
.J 4
M O e>
e e= W O
e e
e 6M E>M e>
Ma 2
eo s= e t=
e eZ e>W p= M e Z e M Z M== M 2
3 O n=
e4 t= > n=.a ZM
> Z to >
e=
0 O f as M Os e3M&Z>
Z M e= 4 M Z 3 3. w Z
==
>= 0 C
4 4g O
t-3Z>
3
> Ci 6 > >
as W 2 =e OO w
Z 2 Z O 3 O a= 3 Z O w Z 3 E 3 3 3 W
>e
==== H D
>>>20EDOkEOkO>OCO u
tw3Ew
>= O 3434E>0E3Dw3EastafE
==
E t= 0 > >
W W af C O e. O
>.J K > 0 ed ad C > c. > >
E
= 3 er== 3 m a= us t
g e.J & > s 2 en.a E.J
.J e
.a so ZC 39e*
>O>O&
=# h >
Ob6OS4&
>=
4 g 3 3 er ODC e
.a 2.a as o e.
.a O v.A 2
2 2
2 er er et er e6 4 e6 O2 O c. 2 404OWO A
a
- 3 4 O O at er 2 4 3 2 4%
2 7 of 2 Ca 6= 2 22 OOOw O eOw4 24O O4 e 4 4 se
==
4 et e44 2 2 2>=
a2g2>
e 6. 4 2 e JJ 2 dJ 3
e O
4e4
>= 4 er 4 a=
e es >= 2 e e> eoe 2 l 40ge4 uJ 64 ud g sa M e e=
M4
> < >= M e=
O t Oe OO e e e@
e>
M
>M e
wCM M
M pe J 2M De O
.J J
auf em t se me M me =e
>= be >Q 6=
6.
1 W
M M M **
M 2 64 F to 4 13' M & 3 W O' J Gr se U 4 i WW v0
> > a'W T W ed TO 4
- 3150 4O=
> O O e- & O >.4 2 2 t-w 2 6 3 O E en er t ** =(
W== uJ 4
w e- >
@ l 433e33 M22T 2.J 2.a== e=
r3 e t 2m ad 4 3Oeceo
.. e c er e >.s 3 4 Z. 4 O > d 04w e 3 3 w.s a er *it es og g et 'aJ 06 Ch c.
Ek M E su 3 2 3 '3 3 Z E IaMvM C
to O
- =
at 3?
si u.
O F 6 tm R t M
m O $
et er W
e M
sun A
m M
man
=g
=g m
=
Eraffic Contro1 Points East Bridgewater, Bridgewater
~~~
M
^ ?;-T,L, f
f
/
]' -
~~'f
~
,. = - yygp?Aq t
y
$N j?
Y
\\
8M;~Mb Men jf 4
WQ
',- c' h[
. 1-Ik s.
4
/
w.
y e- +
w p q~
?
fW W.
li i.,,.,Y Bk>.I y ;%
fs wy
-(J.
-,- o,
As
,3 t'
~
i t~
T" s
x.
u k
kb Ab 94,,
4 S,
L-(,
v m
-i j
.g r-f',
- ~
2
/
i q g p-" *-a-u;:_,f,:,,.o, pm e-E
.o r
a-"
m
,.r...a
- ~T" N F
o, l9[^
j.N a
s
'3 I
e v\\(
g
..)
[f t,__
l4 D
]l.,N i w
, [
3 \\
i
/I-
~
-491g n
..,.n n n S
r Z#,
9 l' I h
"" h D
/
...~
.Y
~? jA g=
fL
,W
- = H B k g?y?q W> /
an
&v.
l?
(
yn/
e
\\
/ N yy A,
~
[ 'D 5)
' ~~
gy w
\\__-
k I I, O
g LJ 4
L i!!
V
[$ $J P ' ****
[a 23 I
i c
e
..r -
a y
2
. ?
it 6
l i
j
)
Ide'l
=
N I
l
/PWIT M42*
i
, _w
- w a
a ar a
-,.n,_1.
e.
r
" L..g, m
Pd5T M
,]
J c
- a
.:. sl.
m,t.-
=
=
hL1 C
.31,.s pl
_7_.
i
=
,3
'g y, 0
t
" 45 1 c TI'l
k
=
~
(
o a
l 2
p.
l s
s I,
=
=
1 e
~2d i
Woup UM ---
swet I-
" Q,,R.
AT W p' 1 j
f g
3, e
=
- i e
-m
+w, t.
..u..: - 3
_.t.
I
= = _. ' - -upio masr m a
w i
g.hM T
4 U
u, ;..
.I i
2-i I
)-
u u
n GROUND LO@R-T, 0 5 10 20 40 t
t
L j
Eyd EJ
+
gis s is !
s 4
N
\\
s
]k! [
'T g
n a ti r b
I asu To M To Ni DNI' IWw
- cuo w L J
__; L_i__ -
= = =i_J.w
~
~,
9
= = ~
2 mii j 9
.. [,sk iMa tj'!
i3 2 2
=Im YYi s e e n E*e* I i
anes a
t i
1-N5sER I
r ~_1.16 45MR4 l
gg -
P" MR545 3
4
- n d a,
r tIu ik
,i f f f ; ;
h..
- h4 3
sl 3.
g
~
i f
l Ld
,,'EE 1;:::*,
./
1 r
T Q =
,2 un ne l..,
p did. IMINI
===== = =o 1
N' O J
==== 5\\
~l R
e m wmA l
l I
.5-I-i-i-.-,5 t
v e
i l*
9
(
c
-p y.
4 G
F]S" F100M 1
I
C>
s 0
. Oo*o>
/
/===v=o D's oo Jg a-
/
D, y
/
=w-w'-
-?m
/.
e we
% Y
- A.,. 4
- h a
/
\\\\ w.
=<
/
X
.. :::=
!'id
( hh., _s gu;i". "::a* ";:J"""
\\
, g y,,
\\
....., = =.....
1..
3 10/26/87 g
oCW
l RECIFTION CENTEBt LAYOUT Fir t Floor - No itorise and Retristration fer usadicaoned - Final Emeistratica, " d fication a
and Emitiaq Rooms For All Evaccess
/Mb4/ MAHft.O LN7)CWG Ct w y)qcy,, N fg r MG ## Asev1 #cA micampiso atAmano 6
- 4Aufr* Adot AerMJett
- .p a w xr m coowu
.f
-l }D """ O M MMMM M
K saft!is14Mg
=
gg g
. Wse, g Imf**=:"
I
.a :
3 y
e.,m.re, g
M V4 ct/A'rtce4 d
M'*4 Meaer l
WWW f
}
\\
9'esma' e.esens*
w.-
n.
~
4 DV^4!*'!MK A
,x l
- - m m i
g L
- e. 7.s.,
r.
/ MEAS h
se.,
)
- N I
- t
~
E
~
WArnue,Apw.s wg/pycg7yevv I
(2.2'
.i -
. [
J memeg g 'l f"
[
-c I
r%
I
- m- -
0 :-
p u
{
g M ag.gA.g, M TWLa75 -
}
m.t.A a
rasa,4 ~
AC/,& 9ers E
~,~
5I O==adicapped Incoming y
l
, 77,. 3
. FE handicapped-conta=4==ted(carverE&)
A
-e L
I M General Public L-4 mg(Gac2 Aasified I
l
"# ##' ' ~
I~#"'<*-~d3e==ei1 WE41
.......n..idual Co +.=i ted wy 4:< m.e*
Lf r-m j Iumeme. Clean, Post Processing I g - fe' M&W ras. Mao amannes m cowrn+ontAiwo w (eensasF) M 15f4CNN bulLpt@ - F1P:ST %K 10/26/s7
m as e LAf9ff third r1 - atartme, n_ r-'astion and Resistreflam - Per Italee l l \\$ tteve( m ) 1 0 b} ~ i. o m saya y%3 I N [ Blane*5 A0VTE t mr muc. a, 1 2 CMTA* nwMA7250 l l e sev,,A w l r u f o ovar r y i om -e I I ~ ~ ~ - w_-'r' c,,-. 3 7maswc/tme rp = IXl ca.warraw, w w w w ~ ~- _g j m CsayWes l I' s~- 55 :: e u smmm 1 (3') Ikm* f 1 n. n nn Ii .E - I I 1 Z "i XXM n...h &g "#%~~ WW W W jf \\ 0s t.J22-v, - E "g y Mec./uiim 5 (5) l ,f I***"*** a:a.,,,,. I b G88Ps># NN k l -l ,t a M Geestal P.ht t e Im a n9( Declassified ] g 'gi g.9eaug ..e e- - -. . i. -.. -i c - Ed I e as e etema. Ie Procoes d*** pl -t s't>97'ARDC B S$'HOrt m Yo M,6sWGTMAT*fCIN
- . F* SUILDNS - TyirtI) r=i_ g 40/}6/8?
e
ATTACHMENT 9-- i RECIPTION CENTER LAYOUT _Secced F1oor - Monitorine, Decce+a-iamtica .g and *M stration - Por Penales and children e NlW
- 6w4tA 4 c#/uwev mammso
.7D sno w # wnce5 N 1 4 84 N 7Awt,0 Aast 0 J oIm mmnk*w o { t i %- -~_ 1s 1 I I " ""n (_ vo airio= l } I D"'4 8N L 3 ~~ 1 ? gC.><C _N e_dern rp J j _. mm m m a aussera f%RfAt l Cserdes I M<=M g :. : = Reev b 1 C') em%: ; t=g y 3 g 'II4*.g.3ay y 2 DCM@@( ,.3 h ee >RTast.e7 } -
- A A A,
_0 :k E, j I w <r, .g 5 urra,cc l
- '"4 b.M; oravxe*
Genrv I -st ~ I M General Public Incoming (Unclassified) d'""' l } m u cce+==inated, la Process jesse,Reridual Caetaminated 'g ggeAgg b mClana, Im Process g 3
- =
- **t er'*
- le a C1eaa. Post Processing 2
g mmh = el ( 9 Anw m, ameoss m ~sr g MM Y Nlhlk *$ V & O S5~5 10/26/57 e i i .}}