ML20235N662
| ML20235N662 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 07/15/1987 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235N620 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-87-228 NUDOCS 8707200167 | |
| Download: ML20235N662 (39) | |
Text
3 ,,,w g- - - --- enenaco cmusuar assio.
INVESTIGAYbON STATUS CECORD weno Ti.. mw -- .y a.= .am == ==w . . - a i.= m a un n n. % ,, ,
m w, n .w. .as w o.,c . c. w. z = wi,w m. .no ,, i. ==,. n., .
o%. ., .n CAsttvas.tI CATGomv o8 8.Cf X o .cesnavi o anaeron s aioiviova u 'esaus .
1-85-019 * %! #" ,g " m.matsaiawevat 01:RI i v .ve=oo. x . or .
^='Sa' o 'o
"' PEACH BOTTOM NPS/ ALLEGED THREATS TO EMPLOYEES Richard A. Matakas TO PREVENT DISCLOSURE OF POSSIBLE OVEREXPOSURE TO NRC BTATUS /3 c4 awe, peOnnea . enef weal March 6,1986: Report / Exhibits forwarded to HQ.
March 31, 1986: Report in review in HQ. ECD is unknown.
April 30,1986: Report communicated via Displaywriter to HQ, where report is currently under review.
l May 31,1986: CLOSED -- Report of Investigation dated May 6, 1986.
,f ~
June 9, 1986: Sent copy of " SYNOPSIS" to: , , ,.M. .<2. ~lU.^ m ' - >l'
\
- a L.' : -,
.n a_ _ _ '. 1; Y A #
. Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of informat l
Act. exemptions _b i 7 C E N --
l F0!A M ' h 8707200167 87071S IN -228 PDR l/
}
f 1
__~ _- -__.
n,a e cs.w sy, u s e.uca tas. Etcutato2v consw r p
[**
INVESTIGATION ETATUS RECORD i MscTeonts The 63r= = to en us*'ww'ed h av.None actwe us esmates s moi ne so e emme er se inns owry 33 envi # ao ownee he. enamed e.,,, e
- 3) day reportant perupd. dridscote *% Qurge" an IM statirs boesh Keep pu erapsget apttb the (Des feW SPET Ser43 e84 e>PT 90 Hee 6quartern on.ee ev sa .e i.one I cas ..a eem catic,on e os sie r X o arenat=c asacron a moeviouat tece=ssa , l i-85-019 _ ' %'NfJ" Z" _
= - =a riaiat s' avis v wenoon s . ove.e a an.;-i o to
"*" PEACH BOTTOM NPS/ ALLEGED THREATS TO EMPLOYEE 5 Richard A.11atakas TO PREVENT DISCLOSURE OF POSSIBLE OVEREXP05UPE T0 f.'
8T ATUS (Seses4 aarve. arist new mer a saer esmerspeamal March 6,1986: Report / Exhibits forwarded to HQ. f Marcn 31,1986: Report in review in HQ. ECD is unknown.
April 30,1986: Report comunir.ated via Displaywriter to H's, where report is currently under review.
i i 4
May 31, 1956: CLOSED -- Report of Investigation dated May 6, 1986. (.,.
- . - e l
l 1
1 1
1 e . i
- e
. e 1
i k
i i
i i
1 i
l l
oe oo.m us uco.. mvt.ro., cc co.,
INVESTIGATION STATUS RECORD I w ,, , ..
c..........so%.~........~.,..~.,.......,.............
. . .. s. .
l e
, ,,.,g. ca'Ecoa- l os s .
~
X C Org aat,=c ag actom * **s D' w 'Dw *
- L 'C E SSi e
~ ~
1-85-019 __
E'l,'f*cto'.". __
= =>"a'a'5'ut' OI:RI w vt=00* a OT.rt a Ts..c~. c v o " ' '
Richard A. Matakas PEACH BOTTOM NPS/ ALLEGED THREATS TO EMPLOYEES ST.,US TO PREVENT DISCLOSURE OF POSSIBLE OVEREXPOSURE TO NPC (50*c.h 0 9. e% omv*0 a br*! 0*.c'ete*!
September 20, 1985: Investigative follow-up was requested to determine the validity of allegations that management officials directed employees not to talk to NRC officials i
about a possible radiation overexposure incident that occurred at the subject facility.
Estimated completion date is unknown. ( S l
September 30, 1985: No further investigation due to higher case load priorities.
October 17. 1985: Administratively changed from Q-1-85-019 to 1-85-019.
,I investigation pending PEco HP Supervisor interviews an a ew o er misce eneous interviews to tie up loose ends. ECD is December 1985.
November 30, 1985: Interviews continuing. Status remains the same; however, PECO Management denies laying off Bartlett employee based on their perception that the employee contacted the NRC with a radiological concern. Evidence and testimony suggest otherwise...Anticiate completion of field work in early December 1985.
December 31, 1985: Field work complete. Report being written. ECD is January 1986.
January 31, 1986: Report in review in 01:RI.
February 28, 1986: Report hand-carried to HQ on 2/21/86.
Report to be returned with 01:RI Director for review in 01:RI.
,we_-- me _ , , M* wa m _
w,. ,
UJ CluCL4 A2 dit 0ULATCGY COMu@oc.
$$i,"* INVESTKiAT)ON STATUS RECORD tw.. e,- . ** **~* ** * **"""'8 *' 'a c **- 5 aa o = it. , . , ., ,,,,
1 ucvio.,5
,,,,,,,,,=,,,,,,=,,',',w."..~wc>.,"*'"".r..wx..'."aaaca"......',.%,,,,,,,,_,,,,,
O*'. o'sa.ea.es e s C a t t C,Can , 08 8 sC t a . senOsysDuat t sCa smSi t g
'X 0 CPtaafsasC StaCTOn 1-85-019 2 '.M U "
y ,g e,00sn a . Ovng a OI:RI d.,, c ,o **' PEACH BOTTOM NPS/ ALLEGED THREATS TO EMPLOYEES Richard A. Matakas TO PREVENT DISCLOSURE OF POSSIBLE OVEREXPOSURE TO NRC STATUS (somr,4 mee, W provedr a erwt smurreproat September 20, 1985: Investigative follow-up was requested to determine the validity of alle ations that management officials directed employees not to talk to NRC officials abou 4 possible radirstion overexposure incident that occurred at the subject facility.
Estimated completion date is unknown.%
September 30, 1985: No further investigation due to higher case load priorities.
October 17, 1985: Ad .inistratively changed from 0-1-85-019 to 1-85-019.
.v < - - - - , . ;~~ ,. _ _ .,_ _
iq -
- .. r. '
, . . .. s .'
v .t- .qq _. r1 12 u ..oi , _ m .1 X - *g investigation pending etCo W bupervisor interviews ar.d a few other miscellaneous interviews to tie up loose ends. ECD is December 1985. '
November 33, 1985: Interviews continuing. Status remains the same; however, PECO ,
Management denies laying off Bartlett employee based on their perception that the employee contacted the NRC with a radiological concern. Evidence and testimony suggest otherwise... Anticipate completion of field work in early December 1985.
December 31, 1935: Field work complete. Report being written. ECD is January 1986.
January 31, 1986: Report in review in 01:RI. ,
y.
I i
/
y. f Q. [,; vf T
r I
5 CHR .JLOGICAL RICORL of INDUIRY Oh NVESTICATION SOCROL NO: Q-1-85-019 i oprNED: September 20, 1985 CLOSED:
i
SUBJECT:
PEACH BOTTOM / ALLEGED THREATS TO EMPLOYEES TO PREVENT DISCLOSURE OF POSSIBLE OVEREXPOSURE TO NRC I
DATE TIgg ACTIVITY A'i /0% //7hpck A-.A/VC( 8 '.k /4 VM(
gc/7> ',r se eqA'M kn -
l l6.] ;ph PW/IA //b / "
- f 311 -,% /ooo ou /e/4 / V e
l p -l(
f% l 0 .2 '
- .' ( ,j:);;,u
. .L x . k $ 5 Ici i
}Vh' .
A /
r 1' '
?
.~ <
,_. j'(g'k-
. '3 ~} ' ( (
~ '
j.IA M e;v)(
)(.)(
( ~-
t pt .r.': { /w psijr j If Ak -
[^j l $ fff* ?Off
.b A a D $ '~ ' Y j .
' .c n b 7 tim,{ .i ibe
,' ~
n /b<eo .
Y ,,4p t.) . Lti DO NOT DISCLOSE 1
This Coeu=ent may contain info::ation c:te:pt from public disclosures r
l k
Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the freedcm of informatin Act, exemptions 1C gotA. e- nA *>l 1 7----- . h92/- /
vf t_ _mm_____m__.m_ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ . _ _ __-.______.__m- . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ u _ __._.m.__...~..__._m__
Q SYNOPSIS ,
On September 13, 1985, the Regional Administrator, Regi I,requesedthatan Inquiry be initiated concerning alleged intimidation f/a Bartlett \ Nuclear, Incorporated (BNI), Senior Health Physicist (HP) chnician involved in protected activity at the Peach Bottom Nuclear Ge erating Station (PBNGS),
Delta, Pennsylvania. The Philadelphia Electric C gny(PECO)isthe. licensee who contracts with BNI for HP technicians. The nqui y was changed to a full j investigation after the technician's employment was te ina d at the PBNGS on i October 4, 1985, allegedly as a result of his invol m t in protected
! activity.
- The allegation was received by the NRC op Augus 2,19p5(fromanindividual (source) employed at the PBNGS who requested tha hi ide tity remain confi-dential. The source identified B HP'technici , herei after referred to as the alleger, as being i volye[d in an incid March , 1985, in the PBNGS, Unit 3 recombiner o gas tunn 1 whe n he y have received an over-exposure. The source indica ed the a le er, after iscussing his concerns )
with both BNI and PECO supe'r ision, as threatened with dismissal if he further pursued his radiological concerns.
In response to the allegation, the NR Region I nducted a special unannounced inspection at the PBNGS, Unit 3, 6,n ugust 6-7, 1985, addressino, among other things, the tphnTeaT IrKts of th arch 1,1985, incident in the Unit 3 recombiner FFfgas tunnel. Asgart ' nspection, the Region I inspectors intervieAd the alleger and informe 01:RI there may be some substance to the ir)t'imidation allegation. The i spector said the alleger appeared to be very char / apprehensive about the intery ew and refrained from making any direct bsequent interviews with licensee management personnel revealed tha[ges. they be ved the alleger was the person who had caused the NRC special inspection by cdAtacti:ig Regico I.
l The Region ! Inspection Report documented that no overexposure occurred during
- the March 1, 1985, inbident. However, the Inspection Report noted that "no i evidence" was found tohupport the conclusion in the licensee's Discrepancy Report that the alleger's survey s meter had malfunctioned due to muisture and high humidity and no overexposure t had occurred. Subsequent interviews with !
the alleger, BNI, and PECUJsupervisors determined that several days prior to !
the NRC unannounced inspectio i alleger and his supervisor on,h, twoPECO supervision occasions andhis to discuss management concerns. met with the At the J l second meeting, the PECO Senior HP told the alleger that he had not received an overexposure and that hij survey meter had gone offscale as a result of a temporary malfunction caused by moisture and high humidity. The alleger 1 i
testified he thought the explanation "was a bunch of bull" but did not dispute !
l the explanation'becaus2 he " thought he might get fired over the whole matter." '
The PECO Field HP Supervisor testified that he reviewed the Discrepancy Report
'in ;early August,1985 and he did not think the evaluation was accurate. ;
However, he said he did not dispute the evaluation with the PECO Senior HP, his boss. The PECO HP Field Supervisor also disclosed that in August 1985, he overheard.the PECO Senior HP exclaim to an ur, identified individual over the phone, "[The alleger) is an asshole and shouldn't be here." This testimony was not disputed by the PECO Senior HP who indicated the reason for the comment was because he was dissatisfied with the alleger's inability to grasn ;
/W -77MM l Case No. 1-85-019 1 N/
/l) * !~l
__ _ _ - _ _ _ _. a
the technical explanation he provided to the alleger concerning the March 1 offgas tunnel incident. The PECO Senior HP indicated his perception of the alleger was, in part, due to his belief that the alleger had contacted the NRC subsequent to their meeting which he felt answered the alleger's technical concerns.
The PECO ALARA Supervisor, who had attended the aforementioned meeting, testified that after the departure of the alleger and his BNI supervisor, a discussicn ensued between himself, the PECO Field HP Supervisor, and the PECO Senior HP. According to the ALARA Supervisor, they discussed the " chances" of the alleger going to the " Commission" and the " bottom line result of the discussion" was that they would not terminate the alleger's employment at this time. The ALARA Supervisor further stated that during this same time period, he was present when the PECO Senior HP questioned whether PECO could use the alleger effectively as an HP if he went to the " Commission."
The Bri: Assistant Site Coordinator testified that shortly after the afore-mentioned meeting, the PECO Senior HP told him, "I want [the alleger) to go in the first group of lay offs." The PECO HP Supervisor testified he.did not "think" he made the above statement. However, he said he did question the alleger's technical ability with his subordinates, the Field HP SupeWisor and/or the ALARA Supervisor, and told them that he was not so sure .that the clieger was what PECO needed at the Peach Bottom station.
In mid September 1985, PEC0 held a third meeting with the alleger and the Bartlett Site Coordinator. The Superintendent of Plant Services testified he requested this meeting to inform the alleger that he should bring his problems to PECO uppe management (Superintendent / Station Manager) if they were not i resolvui by lower level supervision. Testimony from those who attended this meeting indicates that PEC0 management informed the alleger that he should take his concerns up through his chain of command before taking them to the NRC.
l The alleger testified that within days of the above mentioned meeting, the BNI Site Coordinator informed him that he was being laid off effective October 4, ,
1985 because of "too many sick days." The alleger opined that his lay off was {
a result of his pursuing his exposure concerns. The BNI Site Coordinator l
testified that the PECO Field HP Supervisor directed him to lay off the i alleger and one other BNI technician for "too many sick days." A review of Be,rtlett Nuclear personnel records and interviews with PECO supervision /
management determined that the PECO Field HP Supervisor had targeted seven BNI i
I technicians to be laid off for, what he identified as, excessive sick day ab.senteeism (11 days or more during a nine month period). The PECO Field HP i Supervisor termed 11 days of sick leave during a nine month period as "a j glaring excess of absenteeism." However, only three of the seven technicians '
were laid off. Between September 8 and November 1, 1985, 28 Sartlett techni-cians lef t employment at the PBNGS. Only three of these tenninations were l based solely on excessive use of sick days. Interviews with onsite BNI i
l supervisors and the PECO ALARA Supervisor determined that PECO lay offs of Bartlett technicians based solely on sick day absenteeism was inconsistent !
with the current and past reduction-in-forces (RIF) at the PBNGS.
Case No. 1-85-019 2 i 1
l' u_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ - - - . _ J
Th'e Peach Bottom NRC Resident Inspector advised that sometime prior to the current Rif - the PECO field l'P Supervisor infomed him that the upcoming RIF ~
of BNI HP technicians would be based on job performance.
The BN! Assistant Site Coordinator described the elleger as "a good HP" who missed "more than a normal amount of attendance." He said the alleger did a
" nice job" and that he did not have any problems with the alleger's " work performance." He could not recall ever having to counsel the alleger about absenteeism and there was nothing in the alleger's personnel file to indicate absenteeism had been identified as-.a problem. He further testified that sometime during'the Sumner of.1985, the PECO Field HP Supervisor questioned -
him about the alleger's work performance at which time he related the same favorable comments adding that he had missed more than the nomal amount of i l work days. Additional interviews of BNI and PECO HPs did not produce any derogatory infomation relating to the alleger's job perfomance.
J The PECO Field HP Supervisor testified that when the current RIF began in early September 1985, his goal was to lay off two to four people per week. A review of Bartlett Nuclear personnel records reflect, for the most part, this goal was followed with an exception being the week cf September 29 through October 6,1985, the week the 611eger and one other BNI technician were terminated for excessive use of sick days. During this week, eight other BNI HP technicians were either terminated for cause, resigned or accepted a voluntary lay off. Two other BNI technicians attempted to resign but agreed-to work orse additional week at the request of the PECO Field HP Supervisor.
In addition, four new Bartlett technicians were hired by the PECO Field HP Supervisor.
The PECO Superintendent of Plant Services testified that during September 1985, the Field HP Supervisor informed him "that when HP technicians either resigned or were otherwise terminated, they would not be replaced unless there ;
were some special qualifications" the new hire had which PECO needed at the j time. He said he was not aware of four new hires or the specifics of the l
l other personnel changes which took place during the week the alleger was laid ;
off. Interviews determined that the four new technicians did not possess any special qualifications. <
l Testimony of the Field HP supervisor indicated ht knew the PECO Senior HP did .
not want the alleger working at PBNGS. However, he said the alleger's lay off !
was his decision and he did not "believe" that the alleger's temination was a disciplinary act for engaging in NRC protected activity.
The PECO Senior HP testified that it was "cor.,ceivable" that the PECO Field HP Supervisor directed the alleger be laid off because he knew the PECO Senior HP was dissatisfied with the alleger's "technicai ability or inability."
Testimony of PECO management indicates the alleger's employment termination was due, in part, to their perception that the alleger had contacted the NRC which left them with the impression that the alleger was not capable of understanding basic technical aspects of his job because they felt his con-cerns had treen addressed prior to the inspection. However, testimony from both PECO and BNI supervisors document that PECO had contemplated terminating l
. Case No. 1-85-019 3
- o the alleger's employment prior to being notified of the unannounced NRC inspection on August 6-7, 1985.
The testimony and . documentary evidence obtained during this. investigation conclude that, but for his " protected activity," the alleger's employment at the PBNGS would not have' been terminated by BNI (at PECO's request) on October 4,1985, in violation of :10 CFR 50.7.
During the course of this investigation, a second allegation was brought' to the NRC's attention concerning possible discriminatory acts directed at the .
alleger by PECO relating to his attempts to gain employment.at another nuclear facility. .This allegation was proven to be unfounded, i
1 j
i i
. I L
L l'
l s
l l ,
.i Case No. 1-85-019 4 1
! I
I l
(
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Allegation No. 1: Discrimination Against Contractor Employee !
I 10 CFR 50.7: Employee protection (Exhibit 1)
Allegation No. 2: Discrimination Against Contractor Employee t
10 CFR 50.7: Employee protection i
l l
l l
1 I
l l
l
)
I l
4 Case No. 1-85-019 5
e ?
j w acwfcn p fc/ d w i& L 4 : iJesa Vi l ppin n/%rh wIw n ein. .:;;
~ i s dv W -
/, .
l- ,
kwu /%6$p nL/J u- '
,.2 e-C UM N M W" \ ,
f{'6 v49/vij e; u p, aa, fg j J, p % fTC AWJ
^
! pcgw's (f[
g S j {' g L - go k/6 y .s- ne o -~
h;,,V />
j b m'ef70 o[ W "
1
% 4 .,,m, u----------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _
Na
R 1
DV f y l
2 4x
} } o 7 a p ,fc e-k L
= - M . W,,
- d. , - n '
Od }/ // 0 -
0Ido1TL ~ 8c.8r bN 1
,Tik w w- hlk/V &
Q h &ssL- e-t a 9*2-EC 3%
bPINc/
\
s fk Lp L'"~
h b' w W I /V)d gg W ci-2 4
- $ me v-i a p% ;
% RL buh c a3' fm.,?,j ,~ '"
Gs ,
u s ~,y ;
,6Cv '.5 % v b /lh t/l N ^ 9-9 W cfkckt~u , ;8~/p/w/u-,
tuoo nuc= e-n.gc D ceiv dW7n' LJ 66c*f,4f i
O i
~
l
/0 - 4 T' 8 f
. b Y Ol '
/%fJ 74 A', }-.
,u 2 ypb- 4J&us, n/x,4~ -s , ns en-auvi;y 6 / n o a y n J Q /< ', '
/snia As n - $<cerzc;7*;/
/ ,3 -
/A - /~,&nL
!nw/ oA! 78hfg'yAs%s w,
y jic d chy/- l n a w a - +
ACM /wci dv / 62c m c 2 f hvr \
d-, t r & di, d- L. M f /48??) /J l wcn/ 4 had 6 '
,Mc ed dro%
s 6 .f fi / 7W/4<si, k f M/ vp ,4 m O ,,. e_- rU Z my la
-n - es
/ 6 ,,psw~"c-l 9+4 a--,
sin d, c o n /' L w c- f A/L& #w4f) '
9w . F $ fcl O / i~ r y sec{ !
_f,rXc~
i pn , /s r c
/ d ,p e r M L. g $ Lm J'yu c-o rnf. /
gy W/ cL 9- yf f f de/W p 7%'7% w, Ar;/ 2m s < e Mf; W?q - l
g3
- X '. c. . My ', 2 i.
- . . As 4& . . . r;,.0_Q f .$s xm Mr y-_
o g2. 3 e - 2.c , -
_. = _ ...
^.
- y.q :- ~-
,%,22
~
g6 .
~
n . s.. . . ..... ,- . -
. ,,9, _ g v g .; .
3 p. ."c. . . . .
gy . .-
~
y[j[!.ST:'. . .. ? ?, ' i 9 . .
. . : go .~ )Q'$' Y .?
$$&$.:* .' INN 7jf -:lf: W % W .. a &2' lq . .
- s. ,
i
).%'g:W. f.- -
- [ .h ,
.. :C ,p ,
Qy(, _____ ,
n --
9 .
4: yy~.M-En:: ' :,:
GF . .
9p . . ..
.v-g, 4 yi
- w. . ., . , . . . . . . .
~; . . . . .
p.p h i *.'. L '; . 3- -g ,
go v ' _ Q .e - y g w ; ,w.u. r ;
f].y . Q 9 :j.ydn g' f.3 Ca yr."> y. . W - %: .. , $ f - n:. n :. W ~X d v
- ' o _. ~ -
.. ppf5f 7G S.,M - 422, .
l 4-
~
/3 79 M. _23
- . . 4_ 9 l
'70 &;$
~
-'$1 // - - -
j h]3WDc{ (,_
. Y* /7 6C (Nj Oc$- 13 p,
_v ' _
VI _
/V Q l h /Y - 2.0 Y2 ! , , , _ , , , _ _
~
k
- t *h ' , .
. .,r
~
O - :.,.. Ih k M.,_" O d. ,
, .; h's. ,
{Q '
~:.y:Q f-A)nr ti - Loir i7 a-
- - 5 t.; m;;;.,
,3n,jg-),,y h ,~ .- '[ 'l
. . - k- 2-Y
<. .? . r
&$49& Nth 369M MH:t-Wik% M:M..YY a.2&.M.;Qf.
1,". @ 6..
Na :";l : ~
.., bYN&-% ' . Jr *.{ N .s
- i:*, , .4 K . . '. , 3 ' . 9,:'. - ..,,.'h. . $ * .d . , i.- #
.",A. . t.'-;-
- n. e?
gJ,<ki. .;r +*'.%. .,. . ?
. s*jg : . .',i .. -*i,s...=_nu . 'A-T .-
- *. r W V _Acuh.,y'.
.,, . ; . .e
. - 't a'". ,
- - * . .^. ^ ' .r e,,,
,,,.-C' .a :. *
- e. - s og '. .. -
.e . , ,% .*l/, ,^ r ,. , , .rs
% g. - . , , ~*,-~i .N p . .,
,<s .' *,
- 1<,- . ,,
w.. ,y .'.w. ; ...~
" f. .- : 'a s~6%. *+.. y *. e,s' I w .*. ? e
~ y:a. . . .
aw g . w &.. . n. .2. .* .
$. e '* ,.,,
y . ;,.;.. ;..1i,~ ' t :-..'*.
,r*
. .. m%,*
w;. .
. '. w -- -
?v-:. s <.<
i
$..a9M @ "@ UWNSW.P].Mii;nMW('% W F . y. @ .4 - .
- a. ,: . . . a. . :u. .,. .
..- ..~.- . . . .:.- . n. .
.s s.: w. n . m .a . .-
u%.n . . . . :.:
h ', . ,Ih..).
- *f.$!..
,,.,.'.s, NJ- l
.yf
' , * ; s?is.._. ~. ?.e. * .. r.Y. s
. '.: ', .,.. .i
?;p '..isp L' . . . . '.t. ,~,.J_.,*. ... , .; .- e Q ,, *. ,e ,qf_
.,._3 .
s v _; *.*
w.4.,.y ^ ;,. g, ...- f,r(s
.% '; "* )-I.
,.. . .., A.e
- - +. '- ,,e.5 .
-' . a
, , , p -..; , , . ../. ,
1
- I
.f.* , ... .
L ,g LC i
CO l j g 44< /c;7~ >Arme w /p oxAs/."
8 c- A.~ w /ys/- ty v c ^ - A N v e " ', n ' I .
,/ _ . .--
y ,
gg< , Y . .
m 9
- -- i n_ ,_
,- , . m f.f/VN-ff. h N ... ~ '~
< = D : y' A " % u 7$ .tr ._
L a rr.l L / W B M M n f
- 4'- FI
. ..w . ., _
l hW . /h$W/.h - G... ,//. .. j
.W f. Y s n n 6 L Jo / p p
. ~ +.. . -.-. - _
. . jl
- . . . . . - - - _ - . . . . . . .- I l
_ . . . . . . . _ . . . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l l f d'. .c w . -. i .- ,9 ,, j / , on -
,fz In' h tt- h< b k a n n e- .sie 7Yt ,// # !
. ...en-
- A !
M_7...s/Nl !c%- M-e~wra f ,,a,wa n d'=ma$5'*hY% ?$$ /,* %..
,ggge.gg -e ' f* 6e e w ,m g.. e q, e q.pg
- s .< a aei
_ _h - o _. A )
p _ g a,L , ,c,s.
. fan.-u o adhs uJ A H uzw_yu cun L_______-____-___________-___.
!7 r M y w& y A.<i.- e n/H J /N ,
q$N,v 3 ./; /// h n~pe- CA'C s a wr n ,,ai.-
n-,--,,e--
y; j
, , , , , , , .- .,_. .O W #
/f // . i SM scA A dv ggAsus.;&W'
_nsML /o '
- \
-A 7 Ros.LL. d A m:-., m - m u x cqlAj - d$ l { & '
P js,qne% m;+A14,LI 1 --.
RL ,X20t' d -
,, a,+ _ . .. .
<fl20A4 . . . _ _
& a4 -/76~' ._.
,g emM94-N ** . esue -@.Wur - N6 s @D -Nque dump .s- g g. .g .e w 4
-1LlhtYd4 .19... pv (SM.oMe ./
E .7k&wN.r8/ha-m.is g sL whv j 9.>7% 6'sfie. sffA o/}/. A h ,,. Z w s n
. .- ..._p ~ . nsAL-M
.9 waAb).5t?'cyyJ
- _ _ _ _. -_f.wuj%r< / s d / <'z 6 0 % , .... .
.e yy. -6 2-j ySwww ~_L su. f + ,4 ./.
. ./o.u s -. s&&p&qu .- - -. . /'
/w' ~
- in n su~< .
/ AL- l k[/ l] # kWlh$$b //_//
45/ W ds>Lelamfhan emauro::@au :om w r .i %Az 6axi9M's a v W x w'a mE WYme/s-drMmdi .OM'8cNw Wh
-?h:
bE'l$$bfriNfl'y#^525ac<
~- -
e gues .e em ep6u w .93* * .duWKV =EP* .
9
. . - _ _ . - . . . _ m. . _ _ . _ .
. OJ
. . WM yo~ / 4 /'JL . 4 fe 7 r7f' J2'/) !
- - _ . hL .ru % u - <w m&?h-
. __dyt e s ~
. ~
) i i
.w w m g e.ee ww. .m. me* .-***--gue**w we.m-== euw e = =e.. m 4g __ & 4Gm.& P M' WM* 'M M 69*6 " g e. as e 94.me g
- .-./.Woux.._ .
A7/ Z , , 2 4' N t. .
h %. N '/ T - P l i
l
- d 7rt #~ A W &-
/~p/ Q T ... .
N
- M
W*'& M hw we h we.. em.. e-e o e ee.m . ,
@ eehh6 = '. D' '* * . 6 m . -w= gg4 ,yh k y~n < 2/n- A 4 g7'yc : --. A ud ,,;J ,4_ -
,, _ i s u - ~
f q 6 3rs / k f? t - /M M Wf [~~~
g ,p,e d ,A~ ; ;z-u ~ '=ch
~~~
1 ~ v & ,;_.,4 d A ,J 7 ;
7-1 j
l i
. 4 i__._ ._ __.. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _
0
, _ . . + + -_.g .
. .rn <n u ,~ / b,- Assae . . . _ :
..._.. _ _ - . _ . . - . = _ . - _ . . _ - - _ . . - - . _ _ . . _.. - - .-
.M #
- 4 Wu
-75G')_.4)L.Ari -
6[A u, & L /s . _ .
eseanm em-m .
N y, , y . . .
e -n< m, ,, ,
_._ f . n Q Y~ n w_Ksar4[m _ 4A
~ _
96/A &~ .n-y( M .,.< ~ c:y.%[A 3 _ - _ _. _ - - . .-
vAf w- o,4 1
~ ._ _ _ . _ . . . _ .
j
- D _* .eem 5.h+ Se i& 6'8 -m 49'd.m I W 4 gG J wup. m ,.e ,,4 ,,g g gg i..... . _,.._____.... .._. ._ _ _ . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . ___ ___.. _ _ _ _ . _ _ . .
v 84 _v. . d .. h b_ & MMd6
- _ ,_ - . .
p /
-7.b .s . , .l. b,h $AP //l.- b -Ybh) -
. s - - , .,
. .fg
}'l- v /////'dJ(v / ,
7 Y ~~ ~ -
. -esseme - - - * = * * * - . - _
l Y W '
i 1
o____________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ . _ _ _ . __d
d l' j
. . - - - o. y 0+ . A4 &>-fl 4 .j a (.e co u A A- L t.ki
. w 4 m z/A T J- A1ver
- - &, c,4'c6x <<.n,A_Jfu 1 -. y f //G.) _
O 24 f -~ & , i ct Jh & ~ ~ T
&cwc/
y yl r . u-y v --. --
J U cK dr$Myx ~ ~ ~ ~
( m lSEjs0 / 4 z d' _AL$JHf Tl
- . . . . . - - 3;LJw-1.- ,KKLgb,,pmejif,d.f~
_- .Jcx p r + ..w a 7t'b pe f 7~. p n L u W.
wZ.. .
- .. - s.~- ,
p~~
g n ;v_ ,. A w %7 .A&c n&
uf
. . . . . . . . . . . . h...;._6.swennp.s..__.__-.--..
&./zw AA 7S A- p .M /r/.f/dl)yifrff anu fo-=
-/cruf.H - m A 7 e o, 4 .-
r r.
.,g-- - -- pdg yj, sac ,y sen.n.-zg g w6./t,in r-
< ,ngu, s-i 3.-n; < . ye,,,,,9,_, . ,l
, , /,pory-~ - m ,3- ~i . - n ,, ~
l /) h % 0 s'/y /" V '[/ .
e
&pn '^-
. . - . - . .g ,. pg-47 ' ,zQs//_.-..
n ez_p p -f+ s6v x'u ~ a g ,
~~
\
% - ' 1-g 2Q />- A// 1)-f>VhN4
-/
<!.)/ E Cfs-v 1 M uJ 7 % ./ -ggQ ,
u_--- - - _ - --- a
~w' v'
Y 2)1./ y/ica&LL s-s o n ,A. .it'a gsm i~cc&- ,
w&w/
l
, w ,_ y da:~ns ,-
.J2 n _ 6 ./ A ..
~
f (4a_ n AZ)hAI]WD AYLLsAdy
. aw~xt._y .- .
b/J-c/c7 w w dl.-.. ~ < W f f_-.
/uve. eyy N._.. .p'.
f-ff.l
.. . _ . - . -r m, - . _. .
> l~ L_ C Jhu--/_ . ..
. . _ . . . . _ .. ....e. . - , - . . ..
We M'8 WR 8M~ d
- e8M eren GB *a.e. se e s eulepi*g tube +d w ee ee w a
/*" n' 6 E >@v A . . . .
. .. _ A v w , / . 7 _ Af ~ & ? -.... 1 0 $
d 8CUi
~
m.<?' c uvay rn'w .
/
T' l
, e, ans. ...m.- m-* i.
u-.-se.- ... . . .
m.4. gyp ae p 6 mv* 4Eh' .h yO eet 6 8 G4h9 mmeS ese h m m m. w 6 1g*-*
e.6& me y a y eG 6@ ee4. e gy a h- aW e e' ' efs.m . anam& %eeye.a sw an .we e as. m.y p ,m . 4,s>p ,e.,,,,,w y ed eme e _q m
(
1
_.. ____ _. _ . _ _ _ _ _._____ _ __m
Ms '
l
, ,[
[. ,
Wcn vol l s n/Ln /
~a", //c.u> A}xd q.41u,,;,
wwwwcra77J .p-jk, \
.... h C ~klby wWan &
gs.e.
j
- e. m m y a
ya frez.- c A o'cw'~-rw
. - . . ._ .. - _. . . lL . .
n4_n -
wx -+. .
\
ysl[4 Iy-g -
- 6.Gl.96 W 6 eg p.m Nm y m e, . gpw, O. 8 M* 4 hN=% m I. +6 g g4,, , _ _
- *** . ..=y em p p .g ,,
D'- c M e n n _ , [ L ? k /) ~~ ~ _
,Q ( ) - . . - .
g /Qs- f - - _- t.
-->h fuy Amy w+w old v- . s gf) & YY k AW
- .- f/-J4yssusk Mv ,k / An. c_
W .
W/
/
WW"
. /
i ... . . . . . . . .
l _ _ _
r--
. /6 e .
2
, .--*. . , . p , p
_ n-
~
3
- f. N -N
. . p- - , .s. .y.,...
.9, ,\ g
=====.
/
/
- - - -=
y' ..
y ,., 6 .f A7 7, n y f& 9-/y/f
.s/ c,.
/; u. b - i s
,n- - -
c
-N l,3fcf c . jp ,9; -ne w - Ch E-me ep 4 M _Wp w ee. . N =AnD M * .* ee eh . og l .. . .. __ _ _... ._. _ . . . . . . _ . .. __. .. _ _ . _ . . _ . , _ , . . . _
A. A Y . $A./ON f/27' . . - ./ _.
W/(
- . . p .. - y .. . p
, 2 y , y
- ~ ~
- &i n. . &
_. . . . . -,_i. .. .- .s . . . .. . . . . _
em hB 0
-eene ,
-.eee aw. - . e w& 'hs-
- an e.>w _ ,, ,
gy w eem e-o p . em er a r 4 .se 4h e igmes. . ah v.e @tuee a .. , < . a.ieya a ,gg e .g ,,y,,,, , , ,, _ ,
=N$ be NO MSe n.h made we y er.# hemagnhae -, , , , , , _ , , ,
,l W___--_____--._____-____---____-_- ._____
~ ~ ' ' ' ~
_3', t. . j. j i
k t-S ,
.i t'
J wino wa yor ell s i,/n , k 1-L, c
. ~
1
)'
/ 1
~ gn , /v Rt/ N
\
U
( -
1 [j V g6 Uh 7 '
/ : g
~
l-f 4;
>z9 j
$> f,(,y iY [f0 f yr th) ~
V~i V /
^
j M
- l . .
J/'W<5p ? ,, /__
b 0
fif ;; yk L
l sa v l ! l Q s i I L f
i so.s I
'^ i i : ! j u l 1 l l l l .
O i -l [ O
! ! i j i i l ! ;- [ ; l- , ' n.s
- ._) t
! ; i 4 ; i. ! i 1.LJ ! , . ,
a O
j '
i :
! ! I :
Q
, , u.s O i , I ! !
l j l
z 1 - ; >
_4 .,: % a ocru- e l < l 1 i i ,
! s.i i% . i
. . . . - . . . - - _. I. As.$
[I~ l l :
i *' f
LLJ :
i- --
= - .- en l 3t ! 1 I i :
3
,# f i I
1 Oj ; 7 j
i . .-- >
- _--4 .;, a%;
l as.s 1 ! l j l t j Z i '
%,% =_
! 'n Ts
< i j
l t' 1c M, : ce w j l' f 1 '
t 35.5 I L!
1 i ! I N, K J. - l e l
t * , . -
, )
l '
4 [ ll :. _ _. __a C- J. 34
! h r- -- ' - da'A---
- 32.5 Z '
t[ l l l f li o i ! ! : <1 .
},.I, CD i ! I, ! @, _ s I '5, .
H _.
4_-. - _! -
i as.s I ! ! l 5$%,
l < -; -
t
-_L z
- s a .r_, , s. z .
Cl_ ! l ;
I _ i .._.' a.3 i O ! , i I I I
C_] I i ! I -
! as ,
I ! I i l t
I i- i. I I '
,I l i p ._ _ __ -- ;
--a3.5
, , i
)
. p._ ; - - _
l a2 3 a a a s a e a a a .
l Fo14-97-M8' NO. OF TECHN. NO. OF DELAYS 2/3 .
c - - - - - - __
~
, 71;ggg;.5 lydmC6 2 3eaB@R Mei:Ith fyhysicisR Pat.r.e
. B-2(-85
.. 1 On Site Radiction Protectim Page 6 of
,/ R:spirctory Protection AIADA Radioactive Mat. Control & R/k; Shipnent Support Laundry Special Training & Projects ,'
Righ Radiation Area Eey Control .
,i P i*'. .t '
A ..
,; ~ ) ,A A'. P V M6
~
Physicist (Saw. ) l1 1 0 1 Poysicist il 0 1 0 0 Sr. % 1 1 0 '
1
'IA 2 2 L0 2 1 Mask Insosetor= 0 i 0 14 0 l
Stero 1_ l1 10 1 Sr. Tech.- HP&C 6 j 5 10 6 I Tech A , . _
l47 l3 10 -
56 Tech B j 0 l10 125 1 0 l
' Itch C l 0 117 10 10 l Ar.st. 'ler 10 12'? IO IO I Vend Tecn (Out 0:ny) 10 10 125 10 l Mask Inso (Out Oniv) iD l 0 fl2 ll0 Venor: Te= (Pios heol) lO {0 133 0 7 DIAL ISS 168 129 67 4kw Physicist (Sain.) - C. S. Nelson (Applied Health Physicist)
Pnysicist - yttd F. H. Crosse 13:0 Sr . 'IA - R. W. Mat.lleste-t i
3- 7# E. D. Preston i y A. S. Eceard
- Mask Insp;;ter - Vendors Supplied by Ee
- htel S. Grinn.
E. Eurley 1.. Gucrri::
L. Eill
! Stero - 3ad" J. R. Prcaz.n (Jaior Ste.no)
Re:rairder of Personnel Sn%m on 1;c:t Page
(~e2 4 ' f 9~ $8 W'4 6 ' /.l.'l:.J2-
/ *
. =
1- / PBAPS B-26-85' Page 7'of-22
' Sr. Technician - J. Volz i C A. Hoffmaster L. A. gewell.
T. M. Stone T..L. Albright ivrq MA- G. A. Menard S. V. Kirg .c. x.- m Tech B - J. J. Purcell G.~R. . Glessner
'D. L. Perrine J. R. Poteet D. A. Droddy l G. L. Fay y, A, y ,j ggnyg g ; y, p,. {
P. P. Kovacs 7. E. Fleischmann I I
Tech C - J. D. Chronister E. K; Tucker M. N. Sunday R. D. Nixm M. E. Freed - R. L; Workinger .I L. M. Shull D. M. Arnold D. E. Kern I L. E. Bostetter,Jr. J. J. Ccaniskey T. L. Deneen, Jr.
M. I. Shuler D. D. Pendleton,III B. V. Townsend 1 M. M. Waters F. J. Volz,Jr.
Asst. Tech - D. E. Vandentorg S. M. Smith W. C. Dulin D. E. Percztsey K. L. Williams P. P. Valenta S. S. Kohlbus G. M. Lloyd M. L. O Cmnor J. T. Donell J. M. Nixon J. T. Scharwz M. S. Sechrist J. C. Crabtree T. M. Mcdonald l
D. A. Kilbf g, s. TUTe D. T. Striebig S. L. Ditzler H. N. Trin61e, III D. J. loca, i
L. A. Ecmy R. W. Gropp, Jr.- P. W. Lwa,
. E. Griffis C. L. Gibboney M. A. Griin Vmdor Technicians Supplied by Bartlett Ntriear hi$ 50. TLb l hte.srE Tcl c I
l { Tre.mA5
. us h(M N'
%LA i
e c _ ALAPA : Senior Health Mysicist - r?. 7 I r- / ]l A1 ARA' Review and Irnplementation 1 '.:-[
Ime. ?c AIARA Committee '
Shieldirg Control
'A P V A86 Physicist (Sutw.) l1 -1 0 11 TA '4 1 4 'O 4-
'lypist 1/3 1/3 1 0 l- 1/3 t Clerk 0 0 2 0 1
i I
~
i l l
1 mu6 I 5 1/3 1 5 1/3 l 2 1 5 1/3 l "I
.1 Physicist (Sup.' . ) - U. T. Gazda (AIAtm Health Faysicist) 1 l
'A - ( M S. S. Grosh W.- D:uney l GM !
G. Fa5en J. A. Mayer Typist - Listed under Chectistry Section :
Clerk - Suppliei by Kelly 1
l I l l
l i
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DELTA. PENNSYLVANIA 17314
(.
FROM: C.S. NELSON TO: B.P. TECHNICAL ASSISTANTS E.P. SENIOR TECB1CIAN$ ,
SUEJECT: B.P. ORGANIZATION FOR UNITS 3 OUTAGE The attached organization chart delineates the reporting relationship for each Bealth Physics Technica1' Assistant and Senior Technician.
The following Technical Assistants and Senior Technicians report to the Applied Health Physicist thru the Senior Technical Assistant.
l ART BEWARD FUEL FLOOR TA BILL DOWNEY DRTWELL TA N REACTOR SYSTEMS TA DAVE PRESTON BALANCE OF PLANT TA LEE BEWELL SENIOR TECHNICIAN CRAIG BOFFMASTER SENIOR TECHNICIAN TERRY STONE SENIOR TECHNICIAN TOM-ALBRIGHT SENIOR TECHNICIAN JOE VOLZ SENIOR TECHNICIAN g GEORGE MENARD SENIOR TECHNICIAN STEVE KING SENIOR TECHNICIAN GARY SMITH SENIOR TECHNICIAN The following Technical Assistants report to the ALARA Bealth Physicist.
GLEN FADEN UNIT 2 TA STEVE GROSB UTILITY TA 3 .
h l.
}
\
hJ vm APPROVED 4, [ ] PP lied Bealth' Physicist Senior Bealth Phys'icist l aje l cc: J.E.Winzenreid W.F.Gazda G.P.McCarty
' files
l A
A T T y
-l 2 t
-P i s
H t l i i h r I A n t co R U U nt A } ua pr L - - ye A ep
.l KO I
r o n t t l a n o n a i i t - t A E d s c T G r i e A o s s t o
l T o s t U C A c r O - e P l l j 3 a a o y l i i r r T r r P o y I l l e e t r N P t t l a t U P H a a a r e H M M i i m 3 t c p i 0 R r d d e s s 2 O o a a p e o I p R R S B D n
C I
N E
S S p
u -
{
- - y H T l A l Z
I N
A G
R O g I., My. ,b P
H Wf )s 9 h
s h
s h
s g h
. c c c c e ~e e e T , T T.
- T l l A A -
T T e h
r A s f c A o T m o e l
T o -
e A T P l l ., t eT H r F l s c r o
, we o y nt d i . l S an i e n e dy r l a n i e u x al e ,
l l S . F D R BP ' S p j y,
_ /1 d e .
p - .
O A - ,
l
& E[
- ' e l l .
l 4
j l
l i
i l
1 SITE 6 Roiusrp 2 !
i
--- u- _ , , _ i
% S m co rz> ___ _ D l
l I
A%tST. CotTtr /,4#EO/de9EsI l
{&
h/IpolA
- f 3 i
i i
v c' EE WP !
i - i ;
}
iE@ptuAcy ,
l !
\
\
\ !
~, ,
I hf }&l }
Lk J.~- t procw at $wid. '
I $ s~i:L's ;E C- t4Gue$ba&J[as,j a werxeas 26.? 4 Ase ,;d,wdes ;
i l
gap I
l l ;
\
l l
l .
l l
s
2--
'; PEACH B0ffDW ATOWIC PDWER ST ATION-asamaste PesPI e
19
. t>% mi t,mv.s e
'i e
e 8
. PLAN ht!Cf3 NMD PS178 g
8 4
8
- OUTACE Ptsaalet l EsCI5fft s to I : .
. ,........... 1 I .
- : ..Irf cAn .. ;
- . Asp;,gn.u
..u u ian u
. i. t.
e s
" l .
- empIrn4TIss sulf s.appectst C0stituC110N OU148f PLA8NINC $5118E s DRCANIIATIpm DatatIZATIBm $$IN$8ja * '* F s satI!ATIDs etnTrne a
I.
e t 8 1 e
- I e 8
e
- as1161E b4 NCf a
(ht!hifR e s l l .
0 .
e t .S IINIII EI I
CDCRDima!CA MA!W hhk0{
s e
. iktINEEg a e
e ,e a
- ! I I ! j STCRf3 CRCah!!af!C#
N;Utf EPInt A
g k SPARE PAtts f** M11stfuas:t 58Esu11&TIDs l
e lst tsataa!!aTIDs j 8 i l
- . i 8
SENID8 NIAliN ADIONI!1RATIDs '
"" I"EI"II8
- I f
e
, ALa&&) 54tt.6446lE F j l l
, ,............ l l s e
j s . FIELD SUPP8EI
. . . ar uP ALARA t SA .SC 1 fra l g 8
STs4M"l Wit 30k CatDEr.C N w eri M GAtoA e
- I %i i e Is11PLu st 8 C331Wf1Ri INPD l Com160% k.P. pgg,y ,, AtSP. P90I gggg; ggt HSRAI6H C011
, sfPA1A 2 8381881T 1 a CALISA&fICN 9t SNIPflat CA/DC Asatt!!1 i
. SArttY !
l ve e eqs,cch- 4 l 6 "G f b(, oedit. I i : rA 1 ra - t l l s,.r<c W ** F we.a y V : 4,ena . t sat tw.:>ima r l .
..-..............aum.a..a..........................}....*]/w.......................................
% S so HM syf sdJy Bo fef
/ w.
Ta.k L. !? '
Es4, fed. 27 .
' .l
_______________._o
. 1
= 's i Ei;i 7 e :: !
s g. .- r. <
i.sft ). i -
i
- E. a
- : : 8 r- ! !
[i
. .r
.. 16 s- .
35 j
e :* g.
E
- t Ie r
- 5. _ z! _ r; , . . . . . . . . .
g*E.
.iEet - - sr : -fi ! 1 l
E "
l I.:!
55.f I:i .. .. f. - I ast.. s .:!
- - . :: _ : - s - 4 g! i E iiij !! Ei l:} : -
- I
l
-d;ri.i, r
5 r.c ss
- .; :1 _
Il r.g s
- i:s yy ]r
- t**
.i-
- ,1 ).* 'I II-Pg;i g;
g _ .J g,
- E t.;g.
II,f,I :
E t E -
go t' l f
ha I II s i li![*
- t i' j
- y i r .g
. f. ..
3 g; .
i - ..
4 t }
-_ : f.
I Si l
!! ~~~'
i i .i1 8
lr i rr l i.
ij
'- -- $:r -t4 Er -
-11:
s L_ ' .l
, i )
i a } I
.t ,!
, & 4 5
-s -
l l
- l __ :!!l' _
r,rg
. m .
9; i s
........... ......... s ._ -!
- In =
e- -
4
. i, it : et
!lilth,e I:' !- .]: li? -
ild !
.n si --
til ui P
j;it.
1 Il
' ;i; -
-=
E $1) li -
E'. !! -
t r:- - i.i 1.n:n;t ,- -1 ._:;,.=- r; -
s ,_ i -
'l.li. . .- : - 1
!.- , is.cf .i *t lf :
. l
.t. ,
t .
___.) .. . . : <
. . )
- I se : '- 1
.....lye rr l .: I *.*' .: . ~ . . . . .l. .. . <3 I ; {,
.i in. , . .
- i. * ;
. .. . . - . . ._n .
..3.....
i 1
'l I
' .i
\ '.
h f?] 2, dl,lf53 1 -
..-}vt. y y j K. ,.o v .
. . - - - R . - . . 0. .
77L A '
p A va//Ama 4 &
% Asd A sim p,_maoim.
LA_.xA6_;z_, add 4
n due ,u ds 5,4' ..
._ _QA ($y v&IwYaut%w o c.g s a . - - ;
M
,sw w?w-wu
. J. A ,d y, na t.
l 8 O N M mM g 4 mh _pgg,,g,.
g gee NF * * * *** # **
o gggumme q %,. p .,,,
.G * * **6 # * * " ' ' * * * .D' $66 h pp <we e gum .
. - . . . . . . - - . . . - . . . ..........-...; - . .-_ . - .? K. .
l
., L L & ! C- h lx,
t *
,, g:
( '
g... - ..
A l
i l
PETE.O NIL POLICY Q:rporate PhMhy - Bartlett Nuclear, Inc. r==14== there is a shortage of Malth physics technicians and that there will always be a demand for technically wtant health physics and related personnel who are personzble and cognizant of meeting the plant's needs. ,
In order to retain and attract personnel of high ~14%, Bartlett Nxlear, Inc. l 61wves the total salary and benefit package nust be at the upper end of the .!
industry. Our primary emphasis will alvavs be to pay thc hiahest subsistence )
allcwance and h:7arly rate, j
i 2ns, all rmbers of Bartlett Nuclear, Inc. have a ccurrrm goal to achieve the highest level of performance possible. h rewards of a superior e.ffort are many: above average compensation, personal satisfaction, job security, and
- company / plant recognition.
BLUE CROSS ELUE !Frrrn All splayees will be eligible to participate in the Blue Cross / Blue Shield Master Mir-21 Plan. 'Ihe 0:xqpany will pay 62 perm 4t of all Blue Cross / Blue ;
Shield's prmiu:n for all participants in tM Car:pany while on the payroll. '
! D:ployees who are on a leave of absence nay continue Blue Cross / Blue Shield !
l Master Medical if they meet the following criteria: ]
l l
l A. Pay 100% of the pruniuns by the tenth of each nanth. j
. j B. Are eligible for rehire by the ccrpany and rei..an to cur errplay !
within a reasonable period of t2me.
LIFE INSURM g Bartlett nxlear, Inc. is offering free life insurance to all members who have been with the Carpany for the past six nonths (see requirt ments Part I) in the following a:ounts:
Group Life or r ~ -- .
Distrmberment Accidental Death Juniors (Class I) S 7,000.00 S14,000.00 Seniors (Class II) S15,000.00 S30,000.00 O l
1 l
)
j
. . ., 1
.]
. V' .
1
~
y i
[
a t
, eq .
Par I Eligibility-1 10 cpalify, a number nost have worked or have been on a scheduled day off on the first day of a nonth{ard worked for six nonths thereafter. If a neeber has met this criteria, he will then be covered fra the first day of the sevent.h nonth.
Dample I:
A technician starts work on February 16, 1985, he/she sill'be covered by life instarance six months from March 1,1985 or on September 1; 1985.
m zg wtScep: 7" 1 j, 4
j
,f ,
Texacinations and leave of absences, other than vacation and autti2rized sick leave, win and life insurance crnerage the first day <>f the f Llowing 1 month fonowing the date of taminatix..
E;caciple I:
} (i
' .)
A nuunbar who net the critarisin Part I termirated February 6,1985. The tech-pir-imn will be covered for the rest of February, but will not be ocmared March 1, 1985 and thereafter.
1 Part III Rehires 3tehires who previously were insured because they met the requirunents of Part I will be covered the acnth inttediately following the :ncinth they return. . If a - .
- ir-4=n who previously was insured under this plan returns the first day of j the sonth,' then he or she is idiately reinsured. 9y. .
j 1
Part IV Omnge of Cbverage l
.Assices who have been insurrd under the plan win receive increased covermoe the l sonth after they make senior, unless they 'make senior. on the first day of. the ' 1 month.
u, o
i Part V Enrcilment. N; l Li" .
men a member is eligible, he or she will be'sent an enro13 ment card. Please '
L e fin out all itens markad with a red check mrk. E::pe-falik nasne of beneficiary. l
[ ' 3fl ard signature.
>3
, y '
Class I shall designate Juniors $7,000 Grup Life Insuranco
, $14,000 If; Accidental Death na== II shall designate Seniors i
$15,000 Grrsup Life Insurance
$20,000 If Accidental Death
\
I i
! h E___ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - _ _ - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
+ --- - -- -- - - ' - - - - - - - - ^ "
p.
,j. 1.r. /
l BrJSES AND PRCNOTICNS The Catpany nay grant bonuses and prarrotions at the discretion of the president base ulxn excellence in the following areas:
] i 1;, Ideas that generate new business. I 2). Ideas that reduce costs.
{
l MANDA1CRT BDernd social sEronIrr j The Ocupany psys Social Security. and Old Age Tax in the amount of 7.05% of the gross wages of each ernployee. She maxintan paid for each employee'is 1985 will be '
$2,791.80.
LNEMPID04E2TT TAXES The Campany pays unanployment taxes to the federal and state governrrents. If l for any reason er:ployees are laid-off because of lack of work, they will be eligible for une:ployment compensation.
IORFMAN'S CDEENSATICN 4 1
1he Ctzzpany pays workman's carnpensation ori all enplayees as of the first day of work.
VACATICH POTICY Effective 1/1/81 Seniors and Coordinators naquirenents I All enployees who work 50 weeks between January 1, and Decer+=2 31 are entitled to one week of vacatica benefits. These benefits will be equal to one of the following: -
One week of paid living expenses at the ocupany's fonnal subsistence rate, or; 40 hcurs of vacation pay at the employee's hourly rate.
II All trainees, juaiors, laundry workers, etc. are net eligible for vacati6n benefits. Baztlett Raclear, Inc. takes this position because there is a trend in the public utility industry to fill these positions internally. Thus, anything Bartlett Nuclear, Inc. does to zunain com-petitive is ultisately in the trainee's best interest.
If a junior becomes a senior during the year, he or she will be eligible for benefits during that year providing the above requirernents are met.
i 1 ;l t_____ _ _ . . _ _ . . . - - - ~ ' "- - - - - - '
~
0.
Dcanple I:
A junior wrks all of 1984 ard becomes a senior Apri.1'1985. He would not be l al. lowed vacation benafits for 1984 but as of 12/31/85 he w uld be entitled to one week.
Vacations should rot be scheduled durits outages. Two weeks notice and approval of the Bartlett pelaar, Inc. ooortiinator is required.
P=e4=1 Vacation Option for New Bqployees l 2 reduce the pih1= inequities for new employees who cannot ;=14*y for vacation benefits under the calendar year plan, a W=1 vocatitm alle _w has been instituted for those t&c have been employed during the calendar year for nine or nore amnths but less than a year.
m qualify as a sonth worked for the special option an employee need only work one or nore days for nine separate tzmths during the calendar year. Under this !
method the enplayee would receive three days subsistence expense or 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> pay I at the discretion of the coupany.
Exanple I:
A technician starts Marcit 6,1985. Under this partial year plan, the er:ployee would receive 3 days of benefits as of 12/31/85.
W=1 Vacation option for ihrminating Doloyees 2 reduce the yih1= inequities for ta=4 rating aspicyees who cannot qualify for full vacaticm benefits under the calendar year plan, a = par-ial vacation
=11 _nce has been institutad for those tho have been employed during the calendar year for nine or sore sonths but less than a year.
m qualify as a ennth W for the Wm1 option an 7 ;= need only work 1 one or more days sur mine separate sonths during the calendar year. thder this .
method the capacyme was1A reonive three days shietence expones or 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> pay:
at the discretion of the capeny. l ges esoployee =da receive his/her benefits when rehired by the ocepany.
Dcanple I: j An enpkeyee w=inates haranaa of lack of work Septaber 1,1984 :
and' works one or sore days for nine or more months during 1984. l h splo/ne is rehired June 1985. He/she w uld receive 3 days of vacatics w its, splayees who would like the hcme office to withhold roney. fron expenses or i payroll may do so if they sign a letter of authorizaticm.
I
- - _ _ - - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . -. - ____--_L___._
. Note:. No sick expenses will be allowed during the last 2 weeks of the tezm- }
ination of one's at:ployment unless amnied by a written dcctor's excuse. '
l CCMPAW PAID !EYrAYS New Years Day '
Iabor Day Good Friday or Easter Veterans Day. t pa==4=1 Day Thanksgiving Day J zuur-a noe rmy christma= Day Holiday pay will be paid to any suployee tdio works the day before and day after : 1 the holiday. All employees with the ocupany will receive eight hours straight time and expenses far holidays.
PAY PERICD the pay period is for two weeks, elly beginning on a M:nday and ending on a Sunday, unless a different week ending is adopted by the utility. Per Dien sub-sistence is paid in advance on a weekly basis.
CNEREDE General Rule:
Tune and half is paid for all hours over 40 bcurs per weck, except for holiday, administrative, training and travel time.
Excepticn:.
turing the first week and last week of an outage, time and half is paid for all hours over eight per day and for all hours on saturday and Sunday % l for holiday, a&ninistrative, training, and travel time. j TRAVEL j l
..-- - rtation costs to the job site and return to point of origin '(pickqp ~
point) are paid by nartlett nuclear, Inc. upon sa.aticm of receipts.
1). Coach Air Fare 2). Perscnal kto - 18.5C per mile (not to wuraad the price of coach air fare). .
l 3). Use of personal auto idtile on site will be reinbursed at the. rate of $10.00 per day wwhen for most plants.
Travel Pay - Ei@t hours of travel pay and one day of subsistence is allowed at '
the beginning of the job. If the techrtician ocmpletes the assigrunent, eight hours of travel pay and cne day of subsistence is allowed. If the technician l
cannot cxmplete the assignment, but gives a two uneks notice, one day of sub-
)- cistence is all-M but the employee forfeits travel pay ard return travel costs.
I
___ _ _ _ _ _ _ --__ x- - e----- -
\
. i f 1 Dr.3. : ole I: l l
At a certain pL=.nt, employee receiveo $10.00 a day travel allowance for j saturday and S' . day even if he does not work these days. He authorizes j here office to set this aside for when he wants to take a vacation. l i
51 weeks x $10.00 x 2 days = $1020.00 would be available l in additicn to cmpany benefits. {
SICK EXPENSES EFFDM 7/1/82 I i
Senior personnel and coortiinators shall be allowed sick days at the rate of h day per month with a max.u: urn of five days per year.
Trainees, laundry we-kers, and juniors shall be allowed sick expenses at the rate of day per ::cr.th with a maxu:trn of three days per year. j l
Sick expenses shall be defined as the ecznpany's subsistence allowance for one day. A sick day shall be defined as any day that the plant expected the e:ployee to work, but the enfoyee did not. It shall also mean a day the enployee did not work and did not F- 11 ate 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> of wrk for the week even with the adding of )
one of the eight paid holidays, vacation tire, except short weeks that msy occur et the beginnirg and end of an wtage.
1 Dca.ple I:
?.cre is a 1o01 holiday obenred by th: plant and the ccznpany can not bill for the day not worked. Because it is not one of the eight paid j holidays, the eployee will not receive holiday pay. Even if erployee l worked less tha: 40 h: mars, he muld be paid sick expenses, but it l would count as cne of the 5 days allcwable for seniors and 3 days for f.miers.
If the employee wrks under 40 hwrs a week and work.s a partial day, this day shall be prorated taa:ds his expenses.
Dca::ple I: .
D:ployee works 38 hwrs with six hmrs of work on Friday. Sick expenses for Friday dae the a:ployee *.wid ce:
6
-8 leurs x $50.00 = $37.50
$12.50 or of a d=y would be charged to his account or subtracted frczn his subsistence check if the employee used up his available days.
All sick expenses stall be approved by the coordinator, unless accmpanied by a doctor's excuse ve:ifying dates and illness.
Any ecployee may arr-rnlate sick expenses or at the end of the year, receive paynent for 120% (20ii sore as a bonus) of the anount of expenses left on the bcoks. For sick pay, the year end shall be defined as July 1.
{ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - _ ______m
JUL 01 '
86 11:26 NRC KING OF PRUSSIA-2 P02
(
p s * * * * %q , -
UNITED ST ATES
'\
[ ~ ' ~
NUCLEAR REGUI.ATORY COMMISSION
. C* .
OHICE OF.lNVESitG AT80NS FIELD OFFICE. REGION I
,.V 631 PARK AVENUE
% . . . . . ,8 KANG of PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA tM06
- June 25, 1986 ;
l MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator Regi I FROM: s r .' White, Director i
Office of Investigations Field Office, Region 1
SUBJECT:
RELEASE OF OFFICE OF INVESTIGATION-REPORT NO. 1-85-019:
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION / ALLEGED THREATS TO EMPLOYEES TO PREVENT DISCLOSURE TO NRC Pursuant to the request of S. Collins, Chief Projects Branch No. 2. DRP, and my discussions with J. Gutierrez, Regional Attorney and J. Allan, Deputy Regional Administrator, I have reviewed the subject Report to determine if confidential information and information that may affect any ongoing 01 investigation should be deleted. I found that this Report does not contain such information. However, I have not reviewed the Report for proprietary and personal data as I do not believe that this office has the expertise to address this area. I recommend that, prior to transmission of the Report to the licensee or placing the Report in the Public Document Room, the Region ensure that an appropriate review be conducted for proprietary and personal data that, by law, should be excised from the Report.
Additionally, I reconrsend that any release of the Report by the Region not include exhibits to the Report.
Further, I suggest t4st in the. future, if such a request is considered, that early coordination with the NRC FOIA office to ensure that the Report is properly excised.
If you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact me. I cc:
W. Hutchison i hTA ~ 8 7-ML W7 l
~
. __ i
~
.. -. l ab- /
~ . .
" , j L/ L) v'i9 **
fy *""
e
- /o ._ _ 9
/s so t%9'e -
~ UNITED STATES
!" n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g ,i WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
- i July 9,1986
. s MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator
_Jtegion F -
FROM: . e , Director Off ce of Investigation
SUBJECT:
OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS REPORT NO. 1-85-019, ALLEGED THREATS TO EMPLOYEES TO PREVENT DISCLOSURE OF POSSIBLE-OVEREXPOSURE TO NRC, PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION This memorandum is in response to your June 17, 1986, request for my authorization to release the subject report and exhibits to the licensee and the Public Document Room.
While I have no objections to the release of this report, it is imperative that the report be reviewed for information which should be withheld under provisions of the Freedom of Information (FOIA) and/or Privacy Acts. Inasmuch as the report will become a public document once it is released to the licensee, the report and exhibits should be reviewed and processed in the same manner as 1 any FOIA/ Privacy request. I cc:
V. Stello, EDO ,
C. White, 01:RI q
I a.
I Fo24 - p7 - 11Tr 1/e kQ.. cl f?J j i
- ,- ~ , 1
, ; ,, j v u s v i- '
4 ..
~ UNITED STATES 8 t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I r, ; wash Norow.o.c.zosas ,
\*...+/ l August 28, 1986 !
MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator Region I 1
)
FROM: Chester W. White, Field Office Director Office of Investigations, Region I
SUBJECT:
Report of Investigation No. 1-85-019 i
In reference to your request of June 17, 1986, wherein you seek the release to the licensee /public of 01 Report No. 1-85-019: 4 4
X I have checked with OI:HQ and have been infonned that the matter is not pending before D0J. OI has reviewed the report and has made i deletions as appropriate. Prior to your releasing the report to the licensee and. your placing in the the PDR. the report must be reviewed for proprietary information and a determination made as to whether there is pending civil enforcement action which could prevent public release of the report. If you make any additional deletions, please advise me. Upon completion of such review and notification (if appropriate), the Director of OI' authorizes the release of the report in question. Please advise me when you make'the report available to the licensee and place it in the PDR. ,
i i
~ I have checked with DI:HQ and have been informed that the matter is pending before DOJ and consequently this report may not be released at this time, l
t l
i .
M Z8-77-AQ7 i%
y yy 9
- c UNiltublAlth 7 i' NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION 4- !
2 wassiscion.o c.rosss b/% *****
/
May 8, 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator 1 l Region I FROM: Ben B. Hayes, Director
.I ffice of Investigations ?
, l
SUBJECT:
I PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION (PBAPS): ALLEGED THREATS TO EMPLOYEES TO PREVENT DISCLOSURE OF .POSSIBLE OVEREXPOSURE TO NRC (1-85-019) 1 l
Enclosed is a Report of Investigation concerning the captioned subject. The I investigation sought to detemine if the employment of a Bartlett Nuclear Inc.
(BNI), contract Senior Health Physicist (HP) was terminated at the PBAPS as a result of his e"l,ging in a protected activity. A second objective of this investigation was to determine if the BNI HP was " blackballed" following his J i
termination from PBAPS when he attempted to gain employment at another nuclear facility. l i
I The investigation disclosed that the BNI HP did have legitimate radiological !
l concerns stemming from an incident which took place in the PBAPS, Unit 3,
! recombiner offgts tunnel on March 1,1985. Testimonial and documentary l evidence indicates that: the licensee's investigation into the matter was l inadequate; it was comon knowledge that the BNI HP had contemplated taking I his concerns to the NRC due to his dissatisfaction with the licensee's investi-gation; the licensee had contemplated and even directed that the BNI HP be i
- laid off prior to the incident being reported to the NRC by a source l l (C0hFIDENTIALITY GRANTED); following the NP.C inspection into the matter, licensee management and supervisory personnel wrongly assumed that the BNI
~ technician had contacted the NRC; the BNI technician's employment was subsequently terminated at the direction of the licensee for excessive use of sick days; his temination was selective in that it was contrary to past and current reduction-in-force methods; but for his protected activity, the BNI HP's employment at PBAPS would not have been terminated.
There was insufficient evidence developed to substantiate the latter allegation ,
that the BN! HP was " blackballed" in his attempts to gain employment at other I MRC licensed nuclear facilities. l This Report closes Ol's investigation of this matter. Neither this memorandJm j nor this Report may be released outside the NRC without permission of the i Director. 01. Internal NRC access and dissemination should be on a need and right-to-know bpsis.
Enclosure:
As stated i cc w/ encl: fgA ~??S $
V. Stello, EDO (3) ,
v(, White,DI:RI g bIiurw b Y '
3- ,y
- _ -_ _ . _ __ _ - _ . _ . . . - . - _ _ _ - . _ - - -