ML20235H940

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Summary of DW Ewing,Expert Witness,Proposed Testimony,Including Each Fact,Opinion & Conclusion to Suppl Response,Per 10CFR2.740(e)(1)) & Staff First Interrogatories to Util.Related Correspondence
ML20235H940
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/22/1987
From: Barth C
NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
To: Jim Hickey
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
References
CON-#487-4487 CIV-PEN, EA-84-137, NUDOCS 8710010221
Download: ML20235H940 (1)


Text

N RETATED CORRESPONDEtw;,

9 Rico

[9 o

UNITED STATES 8'*

' I,'g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 00f.KE I ED p

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

[fggg

% '" * * /

!)

'87 SEP 28 41:14 SEP 2 2.1987 h5 Shi$

J. Patrick Hickey, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 in the Matter of GPU Nuclear Corporation (Three Mlle Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 2)

Docket No. 50-320 License No. DPR-73 EA 84-137 (Civil Penalty)

Dear Mr. Hickey:

I On July 8, 1987 by telephone you informed Mr. Johnson that GPU was considering calling as an expert witness, Mr. David W. Ewing.

On August 4, 1987 we were provided with a description of Mr. Ewing's backgrourid and professional experience.

We will appreciate your supplementing your response, in accordance with 10 C.F.R. 6 2.740(e)(1), to the Staff's First l

Interrogatories to GPU, interrogatory Number 12, by providing us with a

ummary of Mr. Ewing's proposed testimony, including each fact, opinion and conclusion which Mr. Ewing proposes to testify to with the basis and source of each such fact, opinion, and conclusion set out in detail.

This should provide us with sufficient information so that we may determine whether to depose Mr. Ewing.

Sincerely, Charles A. Barth Counsel of NRC Staff cc:

Service List so 1888k 8'e3l?go 1

o f

_