ML20235H479

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Changes to Physical Security,Security Guard Force Training & Qualification & Safeguards Contingency Plans.Fee Paid.Changes Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
ML20235H479
Person / Time
Site: La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png
Issue date: 09/24/1987
From: Taylor J
DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LAC-12376, NUDOCS 8710010066
Download: ML20235H479 (3)


Text

_ - _ _ .,

. i D DA/RYLAND ,

/ B/N/f=/[ COOPERATIVE . P O. BOX 817

  • 2615 EAST AVE SO
  • LA (6D8) 788 4000 JAMES W. TAYLOR G:neral Manager September 24, 1987 In reply, please refer to LAC-12376 )

DOCKET No. 50-409 4 Director "SAFEGU ARDS INFORM ATION" .

"WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES, l Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations HANDLE THIS DOCUMENT AS DECONTftOLLatD Attention: Document and Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 i

SUBJECT:

DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE

! LA CROSSE BOILING WATER REACTOR (LACBWR)

PROVISIONAL OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-45 SECURITY PLAN AMENDMENTS, ATTACHMENT A - FIGURES, JUSTIFICATIONS, SECURITY GUARD FORCE TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PLAN AMENDMENTS, SAFEGUARDS j CONTINGENCY PLAN AMENDMENTS '

l

References:

(1) 10 CFR 50.90 l (2) 10 CFR 73.3 '

( (3) 10 CFR 170.12(c)  !

l

Dear Sir:

]

In accordance with the regulations referenced, we are submitting changes to l

cur subject plans. We have reviewed these changes and have determined that they result in a decrease in the safeguards effectiveness of the approved Physical Security Plan, Guard Force Training and Qualification Plan and Safeguards Contingency Plan.

Enclosure No. 1 is the required check for amendment fees, Enclosure No. 2 is the " Finding of No Significant Hazards,"

Enclosure No. 3 is a stand alone security document containing The complete: 1) LACBWR Physical Security Plan a) Attachment A - Figures b) Addendum I - Justifications

2) Addendum II - LACBWR Security Guard Force Training and Qualification Plan
3) Addendum III - LACBWR Safeguards Contingency Plan.

It is requested that Enclosure No. 3, with the various attachments and addenda, be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 73.21. g 8710010066 870924 . 3N pR ADOCK 050 g 9- fgl go0 6

- i 4

r

'r  :

1 I

i Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations ,' SAFEGUARDS INFORM ATION" LAC-12376 ,.WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES, Page 2 HANDLE TH)S DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED" September 24, 1987 To facilitate a more expeditious review process, it is respectfully requested that the person (s) selected for the document review, visit the LACBWR q site. This will provide an enlightened view into the practical aspects and i applicability of the proposed amendments.

If there are any questions concerning these changes, please contact us.

Sincerely, DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE l James W. Taylor f General Manager q l

JWT:FDE:sks

Enclosures:

As stated.

cc: Mr. A. Bert Davis, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 l

Mr. Peter Erickson, LACBWR Project Manager - w/o enclosure Division of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

!!r. Ken Ridgway, NRC Resident Inspector - w/o enclosure STATE OF WISCONSIN )  !

) 'I COUNTY OF LA CROSSE )

l l

PersonallycamebeforemethisJY day of September, 1987, the above named, l James W. Taylor, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing 1 instrument and acknowledge the same.

"/ a-Notary Public[/La Crosse County i

j l

Wisconsin )

l My commission expires February 21, 1988.

l

_ _ _ _ - _ - - - . _ -__ _ _ _ - a

4

" SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION"

    • WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES, HANDLE THIS DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED" ENCLOSURE 2 The purpose of this enclosure is to provide the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission with a Finding of No significant Hazards consideration as required for license amendments under 10 CFR 50 Sections 91 and 92.

Finding of No Significant Hazards We have reviewed the hazards considerations referenced in 10 CFR 50, j Sections 91 and 92, and have determined that with these criteria no significant {

hazards considerations result from the proposed change. 10 CFR 50.92 (c)(1-3) l provide the questions for review of significant hazards considerations. They ~j are repeated here for reference. 1 (1) Involves a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) Creates the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any )'

accident previously evaluated; or (3) Involves a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

1. Operations of LACBWR, in accordance with the proposed changes, will not involve a significant increase in the probability of consequences of an

]

accident previously analyzed.

No method of operation is being affected. Therefore, the proposed amendments will not result in a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

2. Operations of LACBWR in accordance with the proposed amendment will not l create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any i accident previously evaluated.

No method of limits of operation are being changed, so a new kind of accident cannot be created by these changes. Therefore, the proposed amendments will not create the possibility of a new or different kind of l accident from previously evaluated.

3. Operation of LACBWR in accordance with the proposed amendment will not involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety.

No method or limits of operation are being changed, therefore, the margin of safety will not be reduced. The proposed amendments will not involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety.

As determined by the above analysis, these amendments only affect security i safeguards, therefore, it has no significant hazards consideration. I The license amendment / Security Plan, Guard Force Training and Qualification Plan and Contingency Plan were reviewed by the appropriate review committees.

Applicable fees are enclosed.

. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _