ML20235F702

Draft Environ Protection Plan (Nonradiological)

ML20235F702
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	07/31/1987
From:	NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20235F704	List: ML20235F702
References
NUDOCS 8707130512
Download: ML20235F702 (21)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:l APPENDIX B l TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. NPF-71 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT i UNITS 1 AND 2 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY, ET AL. DOCKET NOS. 50-498 AND 50-499 i ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN (NONRADIOLOGICAL) JULY 1987 1 A

l (T v SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN l (NONRADIOLOGICAL) l TABLE OF CONTENTS Section P_a3_e 1.0 Objectives of the Environmental Protection Plan............1-1 2.0 Environmental Protection Issues............................. 2-1 3.0 Consistency Requirements................................... 3-1 3.1 Plant Design and 0peration................................. 3-1 3.2 Reporting Related to the NPDES Permit and State Ce rti f i cati on............................................ 3-2 3.3. Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Re g u l a t i o n s.............................................. 3 - 3 4.0 Environmental Conditions................................... 4-1 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events.................. 4-1 4.2 Environmental Monitoring................................... 4-1 5.0 Admi ni strative Procedures.................................. 5-1 5.1 Rev i ew a nd Audi t........................................... 5-1 5.2 Records Retention.......................................... 5-1 5.3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan................... 5-2 5.4 Pl ant Reporti ng Requi rements............................... 5-2

1.0 Objectives of the Environmental Protection Plan l i The Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) is to provide for protection of ) nonradiological environmental values during operation of the nuclear facility. ) The principal objectives of the EPP are as follows: (1) Verify that the facility is operated in an environmentally acceptable manner, as established by the Final Environmental Statement - Operating ] ) Licensing Stage (FES-OL) and other NRC environmental impact assessments. l (2) Coordinate NRC requirements and maintain consistency with other Federal, { t State and local requirements for environmental protection. ) f i (3) Keep NRC informed of the environmental effects of facility construction and operation and of actions taken to control those effects. j ( 1 l Environmental concerns identified in the FES-OL which relate to water quality i matters are regulated by way of the licensee's NPDES permit. l l l 1-1

-r j Y 2.0 Environmental Protection Issues ~~" In the FES-OL dated August 1986 (NUREG-1171), the staff considered the environmental impacts associated with the operation of the South Texas Project Unit Nos. 1 and 2. No aquatic / water quality, terrestrial, or noise issues were identified. l l 2-1

3. 0 Consistency Requirements 3.1 Plant Design and Operation i

The licensee may make changes in plant design or operation or perform tests or 1 experiments affecting the environment provided such activities do not involve an unreviewed environmental question and do not involve a change in the EPP*. l Changes in plant design or operation or performance of tests or experiments which do not affect the environment are not subject to the requirements of this EPP. Activities governed by Section 3.3 are not subject to the require-ments of this Section. Before engaging in additional construction or operational activities which may ~ significantly affect the environment, the licensee shall prepare and record an environmental evaluation of such activity. Activities are excluded from this requirement if all measurable nonradiological environmental effects are confined to the on-site areas previously disturbed during site preparation and l 1 plant construction. When the evaluation indicates that such activity involves an unreviewed environmental question, the licensee shall provide a written i evaluation of such activity and obtain prior NRC approval. When such activity involves a change in the EPP, such activity and change to the EPP may be implemented only in accordance with an appropriate license amendment as set i forth in Section 5.3 of this EPP. ^This provision dw not relieve the licensee of the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59. l 3-1

)[f i A proposed change, test or experiment shall be deemed to involve an unreviewed environmental question if it concerns: (1) a matter which may result in a significant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the FES-OL, environmental. impact appraisals, or in any i i decisions of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; or (2) a significant l I change in effluents or power level; or (3) a matter, not previously reviewed and evaluated in the documents specified in (1) of the Subsection, which may j i have a significant adverse environmental impact. ) The licensee shall maintain records of changes in plant design or operation and of tests and experiments carried out pursuant to this Subsection. These records shall include written evaluations which provide bases for the deter- \\ mination that the change, test, or experiment does not involve an unreviewed environmental question or constitute a decrease in the effectiveness of this EPP to meet the objectives specified in Section 1.0. The licensee shall include as part of the Annual Environmental Operating Report (per Subsection l 5.4.1) brief descriptions, analyses, interpretations, and evaluations of such changes, tests and experiments. 3.2 Reporting Related to the NPDES Permit and State Certification Changes to, or renewals of, the NPDES Permit or the State certification shall be reported to the NRC within 30 days following the date the change or renewal is approved. If a permit or certification, in part or in its entirety, is appealed and stayed, the NRC shall be notified within 30 days following the date the stay is granted. l 3-2

The licensee shall notify the NRC of changes to the effective NPDES Permit proposed by the licensee by providing NRC with a copy of the proposed change at the same time it is submitted to the permitting agency. The licensee shall provide the NRC a copy of the application for renewal of the NPDES Permit at the same time the application is submitted to the permitting agency. l 3.3 Changes Required for Compliance with Other Environmental Regulations Changes in plant design or operation and performance of tests or experiments which are required to achieve compliance with other Federal, State, and local environmental regulations are not subject to the requirements of Section 3.1. i l 4 3-3

\\ 4.0 Environmental Conditions 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events Any occurrence of an unusual or important event that indicates or could result in significant environmental impact causally related to plant operation shall be recorded and reported to the NRC within 24 hours followed by a written report per Subsection 5.4.2. The following are examples: onsite plant or animal disease outbreaks; mortality or unusual occurrence of any species pro-tected by the Endangered Species Act of 1973; fish kills; increase in nuisance organisms or conditions; and unanticipated or emergency discharge of waste water or chemical substances. No routine monitoring programs are required to implement this condition. 4.2 Environmental Monitoring l 4.2.1 Aquatic Monitoring i The certifications and permits required under the Clean Water Act provide mechanisms for protecting water quality and, indirectly, aquatic biota. The NRC will rely on the decisions made by the U.S. Environmental Protection i Agency and the state of Texas under.the authority of the Clean Water Act for any requirements for aquatic monitoring. 4-1 r

DAAF 4.2.2 Terrestrial Monitoring No terrestrial monitoring is required. I 4.2.3 Noise Monitoring l No noise monitoring is required. 4.2.4 Fog Monitoring The licensee shall provide to the NRC the results of the fog monitoring program as described in Section 6.2.4.2 of Amendment 10 to the Environmental Report dated June 16, 1987. The report shall be provided within a reasonable time after completion and documentation of the results of the program. l I l l 4-2

k' I I 5.0 Administrative Procedures 5.1. Review and Audit l The licensee shall provide for the review and audit of compliance with the EPP. l The audits shall be conducted independently of the individual or groups responsible for performing the specific activity. A description of the organization structure utilized to achieve the independent review and audit function and results of the audit activities shall be maintained and made available for inspection. 5.2. Records Retention Records and logs relative to the environmental aspects of station operation shall be made and retained in a manner convenient for review and inspection. These records and logs shall be made available to NRC on request. I Records of modifications to station structures, systems and components l determined to potentially affect the continued protection of the environment shall be retained for the life of the station. All other records, data and logs relating to this EPP shall be retained for five years or, where appli-cable, in accordance with the requirements of others agencies. 1 5-1

5. 3 Changes in Environmental Protection Plan i

Requests for changes in the EPP shall include an assessment of the environ-mental impact of the proposed change and a supporting justification. Imple-mentation of such changes in the EPP shall not commence prior to NRC approval of the proposed changes in the form of a license amendment incorporating the appropriate revision to the EPP. I 5.4 Plant Reporting Requirements 1 5.4.1 Routine Reports I An Annual Environmental Operating Report describing implementation of this EPP for the previous year shall be submitted to the NRC prior to May 1 of each year. The period of the first report shall begin with the date of issuance of the Operating License for Unit 1, and the initial report shall be submitted prior to May 1 of the year following issuance of the Operating License for Unit 1. The report shall include summaries and analyses of the results of the environ-mental protection activities required by Subsection 4.2 (if any) of this EPP for the report period, including a comparison with related preoperational studies, operational controls (as appropriate), and previous nonradiological environmental monitoring reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of 4 the plant operation on the environment. If harmful effects or evidence of b l S-2

trends toward irreversible damage to the environment are observed, the licensee shall provide a detailed analysis of the data and a proposed course of mitigating action. The Annual Environmental Operating Report shall also include: l (1) A list of EPP noncompliance and the corrective actions taken to i remedy them. (2) A list of all changes in station design or operation, tests, and experiments made in accordance with Subsection 3.1 which involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental question. 1 (3) A list of nonroutine reports submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2. In the event that some results are not available by the report due date, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the missing results. The missing results shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report. 5.4.2 Nonroutine Reports A written report shall be submitted to the NRC within 30 days of occurrence of a nonroutine event. The report shall: (a) describe, analyze, and evaluate 5-3

the event, including extent and magnitude of the impact, and plant operating characteristics; (b) describe the probable cause of the event; (c) indicate the action taken to correct the reported event; (d) indicate the corrective action taken'to preclude repetition of the event and to prevent similar occur-l rences involving similar components or systems; and (e) indicate the agencies notified and their preliminary responses. Events reportable under this subsection which also require reports to other Federal, State or local agencies shall be reported in accordance with those reporting requirements in lieu of the requirements of this subsection. The i NRC'shall be provided with a copy of such report at the same time it is sub-mitted to the other agency. l 4 c t 5-4

T)LkN CONFORMED December 1980 LICENSE CONDITIONS FOR SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNIT N05. 1 AND 2 I. A. The following definitions apply to paragraph I.B: (1) " Applicants" means severally and jointly Houston Lighting and Power Company (HLP), Central Power and Light Company (CPL), City Public Service Board of San Antonio.(CPSB), and the City. of Austin Electric Utility Department (C0A) and any of their respective successors, assignees, or subsidiaries engaged in the generation, transmission or the distribution of electric Where a license condition is directed to a specific power. Applicant, that Applicant is' identified. (2) " South _ Texas Area" means (a) those counties in which Appli-cant's serve electric customers at wholesale or retail, and (b) those other areas, if any, surrounded by the areas in (a) above. (3) " Entity" means an electric utility which is a person, a private or public corporation, a governmental agency or authority, a municipality, a cooperative, or an association of any of the foregoing owning, operating, or contractually controlling, or proposing in good faith to own, operate, or contractually control facilities for generation, transmission or distribution of electric power and energy 1or the purpose of providing electric utility service. (4) " Bulk Power" means the electric power and/or electric energy supplied or made available at transmission or subtransmission voltages. (5) " Costs" means all appropriate operating and maintenance expenses and all ownership costs where applicable. (6) The terms " connection" and " interconnection" are used inter-changeably. B. The Applicants defined in Paragraph I.A.(1) are subject to the following antritrust conditions: (1) (a) CPL shall afford to the Public Utilities Board of the City of Brownsville an opportunity to participate in the South Texas Projects, Units 1 and 2, on reasonable terms and conditions and in accordance with the South Texas Project Participation Agreement and on a basis that will fully compensate CPL for its actual costs, provided that Appendix C - South Texas

I 1 Brownsville must enter into a firm commitment to acquire the ownership interest made available to it by the terms I of this paragraph no later than January 1, 1983. The ownership interest which CPL shall make available to l Brownsville shall be computed by multiplying CPL's 1 Generation Entitlement Share in STP Units 1 and 2 by the ratio of Brownsville's peak demand for 1980 to CPL's l peak demand for 1980. In the event Brownsville obtains I an ownership interest from any Applicant other than CPL, i the ownership interest which CPL must make available to i Brownsville hereunder shall be reduced by one megawatt for each megawatt in excess of 12 megawatts that Browns-ville acquires from other Applicants. Applicants shall not exercise any rights of first refusal over Brownsville's efforts to participate in the South Texas Project to the extent of the first 50 MW of such ownership share. (b) CPL shall afford Brownsville reasonable transmission i services to enable it to obtain delivery of power from the STP, provided that CPL is fully compensated for its j costs of such transmission services plus a reasonable return on investment, and provided further that in the j event transmission capacity is not available to provide such transmission services, the provisions of Paragraph I.B.(4) hereof define the extent of the obligation which CPL has with respect to the construction of additional transmission facilities necessary to provide such trans-mission service. (c) CPL will also afford all reasonable coordination services (including but not limited to reserve sharing, backup power, maintenance power and emergency power) necessary i for Brownsville to have effective access to power from STP obtained from CPL, provided that CPL is fully com-pensated for its costs of providing such coordination services plus a reasonable return on investment. (d) Each Applicant shall facilitate where necessary Browns-ville's obtaining the participation interests and services specified in paragraphs 1(a), 1(b), and 1(c) above. (2) The Applicants, as long as they are members of the Texas Interconnected Systems (TIS) or any other organization which considers the planning for or operations of ERCOT-TIS elec-tric utilities, shall support reasonable requests by Entities in the South Texas Area having generation capacity for member-ship in TIS or such other organizations. The Applicants shall also propose and actively support, as long as they are members thereof, the creation of one or more additional Appendix C - South Texas

l $b classification of TIS membership, based on non-discriminatory J criteria to afford access to data, studies and recommendations to all Entities in the South Texas Area who desire membership. The Applicants shall share information with other Entities with respect to, and shall conduct with other such Entities through any electric utility planning organizations of which the Applicants are members, joint studies and planning of future generation, transmission and related facilities; provided, however, that this condition shall not obligate the Applicants to conduct such joint studies or' joint planning unless (1) the studies or planning are requested and carried out in good faith and based on reasonably realistic and reasonably complete data or projections, (2) the studies or planning are reasonably justified on the basis of sound engineering principles, (3) appropriate protection is accorded proprietary or other confidential business and financial information, and (4) the costs of such studies or planning are allocated on a fair and equitable basis. (3) Each Applicant shall participate in and facilitate the exchange of bulk power by transmission over its own transmission facilities between or among two or more Entities in the South Texas Area with which the Applicant is connected; and between any such Entity (ies) and any Entity (ies) outside the South 1 Texas Area between whose facilities the Applicant's trans-mission lines and other transmission lines, including direct current (asynchronous) transmission lines, form a continuous electrical path; provided, that (i) permission to utilize such other transmission lines has been requested by the pro-ponent of the arrangement, (ii) the arrangements reasonably i can be accommodated from a functional and technical stand-point, and (iii) any Entity (ies) requesting such transmission arrangements shall have given reasonable advance notice of its (their) schedule and requirements. Such transmission shall be on terms that fully compensate an Applicant for its costs including a reasonable return on investment; provided, however, that such transmission services and the rates to be charged therefor shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the i appropriate regulatory agency (ies). Where the rates to be charged are subject to the jurisdiction of an appropriate regulatory authority, the Applicants shall not refuse to provide such transmission services merely because the rate (s) to be charged therefor are the subject of dispute with such Entity (ies). An Applicant shall not be required to enter into any arrangement which would unreasonably impair system reliability or emergency transmission capacity, it being recognized that while some transmission may be operated fully loaded other transmission may be for emergency use and operated either unloaded or partially loaded. Appendix C - South Texas

(4) Each Applicant shall include in its planning and construction 4 programs sufficient transmission capacity as required for the transactions referred to in paragraph I.B.(3) (and I.B.(5) for CPL), provided any Entity (ies) in the South Texas Area gives an Applicant sufficient advance notice as may be neces-sary to accomodate its (their) requirements from a functional and technical standpoint and that such Entity (ies) fully compensates an Applicant for its costs including a reasonable return on investment.1/ An Applicant shall not be required to construct transmission facilities if construction of such facilities is infeasible, or if such would unreasonably impair system reliability or emergency transactions capacity. j In connection with the performance of the obligations above, j j an Applicant shall not be foreclosed from requiring a reason-J able contribution in aid of construction or from making ) arrangements for coordinated construction of future trans-1 mission lines such that each of the parties to the trans-action would own an interest in or a segment of the trans-mission addition in proportion to its share of the cost of the addition. Any such contribution made in aid of construc-tion or ownership interest shall also be properly credited in determining any wheeling charges. If an Applicant engages in joint ownership of transmission lines with any other Entity (ies), it shall not refuse to engage in similar transactions in comparable circumstances with other Entities, subject to the provisions limiting an Applicant's obligations above. (5) CPL shall, upon reasonable advance notice, enter into arrange-i ments for the sale of full and partial requirements bulk l power pursuant to a filed tariff to any requesting Entity having a non-aggregated generating capacity of 200 megawatts or less under reasonable terms and conditions which shall include a provision for CPL to recover its costs of providing such service plus a reasonable return on investment. Such tariff shall not require CPL to enter into any arrangement for such sale (s) if (a) it does not have available sufficient bulk power or adequate transmission to provide the requested service; or (b) the sale would impair CPL's ability to render adequate and reliable service to its own customers or its ability to discharge prior commitments. It is expressly recognized, and such tariff may reflect, that the determination whether suffi-cient bulk power or adequate transmission is available to accom-modate a request for full or partial requirements bulk power will consider and recognize that (1) CPL will be engaging in -1/ Nothing in this paragraph shall require CPSB or C0A to undertake any action (s) which may be contrary to any state constitutional provision. Appendix C - South Texas j l l l t i

. centralized economic dispatch with its affiliates in accord-ance with, and pursuant to the requirements of, the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, (2) pursuant to such requirements CPL may first utilize its generating and trans-mission capacity to accomplish such centralized economic dispatch before its generating and transmission capacity is made available for full or partial requirements bulk power sales under the tariff, and (3) if other CSW system capacity becomes available by reason of CPL's participation in such centralized economic dispatch, then such other CSW system capacity will, at the option of CSW, be made available in lieu of CPL's obligation to provide such capacity. Any curtailment of CPL's full or partial requirements sales shall be on a reasonable and non-discriminatory (where possible) basis. (6) (a) In connection with the performance of its obligations herein and subject to the provisions of this paragraph, HLP shall not disconnect from or refuse to connect its then-existing or proposed facilities with the facilities of any Entity used or proposed to be used for the trans-mission of electric energy in interstate commerce by reason of the interstate character of such facilities, and HLP will not prevent any Entity with which it main-tains connections from establishing, maintaining, modi-fying or utilizing a connection with facilities used or proposed to be used for the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce by reason of the inter-state character of such facilities, provided that, anything in these license conditions to the contrary notwithstanding (but subject to subparagraph 6(b) and 6(d) below) any Entity seeking to establish, maintain, modify or utilize any connection which could affect the nonjurisdictional status of HLP under the Federal Power Act shall have filed an application with and used its best efforts to obtain an order from the FERC, applicable to HLP under Section 210, 211 and 212 of such Act, requiring the establishment, maintenance, modification I or utilization of such connection. In the event that an Entity files an application pursuant to this subparagraph, HPL agrees that it will not unreasonably oppose any such application. In the event such application is denied by a valid order of the FERC, any continuing refusal by HLP to estabish, maintain, modify or utilize such connection with such Entity shall be subject to review by the NRC in accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder, to determine whether any such refusal would create or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust Appendix C - South Texas

I I laws or the policies thereunder in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 105 of such Act; provided i that all factual determinations by the FERC on any cost or system reliability reason (s) for any such refusal shall not be subject to redetermination by the NRC. The i burden of proof will be on the HLP in such NRC proceeding. l (b) HLP shall not enter into or maintain any agreement or 3 understanding with any other Entity (ies) or Applicant to j refuse to deal with another Entity (ies) or Applicant (s) J I with the purpose of maintaining a non-jurisdictional status under the Federal Power Act, and in the event that HPL refuses to make an interconnection with or -chooses to disconnect from any Entity (ies), such decision and/or action by HLP will be undertaken unilaterally, not jointly, and without consultation with any other Entity (ies), provided, however, that after HLP decides to undertake such action, it may notify any affected Entity of its decision. -(c) In the event that an Entity files an application pursuant to subparagraph (a) of this paragraph solely by reason l of HLP's desire to maintain its non-jurisdictional status under the Federal Power Act, HLP agrees to pay such I Entity's reasonable expenses in connection with such application and the ensuring proceeding, 2/ provided, l however, that HLP shall not be required to pay for any expenses of such Entity of that Entity's application is denied by FERC for reasons advocated by HLP at FERC, and provided further, that HLP shall not be required to pay for any costs or expenses of such Entity which that Entity would have incurred had it not failed an applica-tion solely by reason of HLP's desire to maintain its non-jurisdictional status under the Federal Power Act. (d) Nothing in these License Conditions shall impair the right of the Department of Justice or any other Entity, public or private, to file an' antitrust action in any Federal Court in the event any Applicant refuses to establish, maintain, modify or utilize any connection with any Entity (ies), provided that nothing herein shall preclude any Applicant from raising any legal or equitable defense that may be available to it. 2/ This obligation shall not apply to the expenses of Central and South West Corporation or Texas Utilities Company or any of their respective sub-sidiaries, including but not limited to the expenses of CSW and any of its subsidiaries incurred in FERC Docket No. EL79-8. Appendix C - South Texas 1 1 (7) HLP agrees to use its best efforts to amend any agreements with all Entities to ensure that such agreements are not inconsistent with paragraphs (6)(a) and (6)(b) hereof. (8) If Applicants participate in any future nuclear units other than those which are now under construction or for which an application for a construction permit has been filed. they will afford similar participation to Entities in the South Texas Area on a reasonable basis. (9) Applicants agree that the reliability of power delivered into TIS-ERCOT over DC asynchronous connections shall not be treated differently by the Applicants, for purposes of spinning and installed reserve calculations and requirements, than would be the case if such power originated with TIS-ERCOT. Outages on DC asynchronous connections shall be treated by the Applicants in the same way as losses of generation within TIS-ERCOT. Applicants agree to support the adoption of principles involving DC asynchronous connections contained in this paragraph within any TIS or ERCOST organization. (10) HLP and CPL shall use their best efforts to modify the Offer of Settlement filed in FERC Docket No. EL79-8 to include each of the undertakings set forth in the letter agreement among HLP, Central and South West Corporation, Texas Utilities Company and the FERC staff, dated September 11, 1980. HLP and CPL shall thereafter use their best efforts to secure approval thereof by the FERC, and shall abide by any valid order (s) of the FERC issued purusant to the Offer of Settle-ment. Nothing herein shall preclude the Department cf Justice from instituting or intervening in any proceeding at FERC, including Docket No. EL79-8, and from presenting such argu-ments and evidence that it deems appropriate. (11) The foregoing conditions shall be implemented (1) in a manner consistent with applicable Federal, state and local statutes and regulations, and (2) subject to any regulatory agency having jurisdiction. Nothing herein shall preclude the Applicants from seeking an exemption or other relief to which they may be entitled under applicable law or shall be construed as a waiver of their right to contest the applicability of the license conditions with respect to any factual situation. Appendix C - South Texas

GK,fy p.:3 pm:m u-c~~ .ww \\ . -p:, 3,pc,r 'y e, ' ' >' <k. ( ^

e

'k ;; j,g'.kkB./ .....~ y 9 g %;, ~, I + ra ..e ../.L$$$..e..G. 1 3 init! u t ~, e q:p.% s. q1.

- i Jf p h ;e;. m.

,,j f

y.;

s t e .. ~ jf.n :m. m: ag., cy a g..s > '?, I;giw i. f c p. g , g. ud _4 ug unv.- a .. ~. y ., e > 'V' es: l' 7$y.$6 6, ;.;+ .a. 'l;,<f An,l!ft,: yv, DlLw .. a}t gB)h % t y e:

s. s n l

y f; 4 1 q*;- <s+ v ,n, .o.~,^

sp;f Gymh W

a +q y ., h:gw, g ~ v .c e - -.. %n..y.moy, e < w ,OjiWTW; N _ -{, n "r .,.n,~. o.pd 9 K%., ,~

.n

.w-Nkd, h'9 .a g y,A m. q j m . f@Y::] ( ' M MS * '

' f(l_

12TO.&'YT.',t l '_' Q-W' Ui(I IX .. ' Q L Fa,, e (.i -w:. t.7. [ J < i .,. W ?,. y .y'.%j a s. y. . d.B,,4 y' -

e. i. <?. <,.a,

,_g "o ,.4. s l gg..r.y.

m. A;.yx., '

.M fn.. y m n, e a st,-- v it ' J@ i t-my i W5ty. <r s -[g y g@,' e,.w, 4 + es ,n yg

i n.

w h,m..

• i '.+

' qf yph 7; 3 ../ i i

1. a-

.,.- e w h, 6, gg . 9. ?,' ('7 i 7 -w ,; o 1 ~,9%.,.. - e e.. ,f r ,. ' }: > o.- ,e r., Ak((y,a) M e d. g i M. 2, g , e. g.#p. g, . r-3 < ws. e g-g (, t. r .A. I l l 3;p:! 4

g#-..h; e

-5 j i [fN., '.~. ', j mA+ y. 4 pg <1.:. r p94 g....-

q.

g.. l .Q3 . e; m,.,'., .y sc ,r l ,:4.%ih' m,( 7 E8 5 l 4 e &y W N, 4 1 f _th-4k g.. ~ 1 j A_p4 ,J,., MQ,.@- .[' ,lkev.179), i 4

f. '.

M_. I-f -{',. i g 1 i _a

,,7._.._.__,.-c~,. y ~ 'h7)Jj{ ROUTING AND'TRAN8MlTTAL SOPL 1 . TOs (Name, office symbol, room number,. Initials' Date. i bulMing, Agency] Post) y DCdkN ,0 e - h L1. - f. 2-r g.

3.

i 4. 5. a-File Note and Retum z Action - Approval : For Clearance - Per Conversation - As Requested For Correction Prepare Reply ' Circulate. For Your Information ' See Me a Comment - Investigate. Signature : Coordination ' Justify. ' REMARKS' e.- g. a a ts/s / g D.h i

i. L t'cu,se.

p 4.JQgS,. 1 00 NOT use this form as t a ' RECORD 'of' approvals.< conctrtrences, disposals,'. ' clearances, and similar actions - ' FROM:(Name,org. symbol, Agency l Post) R m No,-Bk g. 1 a 'A ,N 7-. .gggo7 o* L 8041 102 - OPTION AL FORhl 41 (Rev. 7 76) IP 4YNRf10121h.308 - J

• u.s.oPo:1se5 0E1547222-1}}