ML20235E810
| ML20235E810 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/29/1987 |
| From: | AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-3-A-044, OL-3-A-44, NUDOCS 8709280277 | |
| Download: ML20235E810 (17) | |
Text
,f
- (2tco Mt'/'-/
. P - 2 4 -- e r ' er R z a4 : 2e 6< L D
- 4.. 'ooe.
I n c.
P.e2
$ -322" M 3 r,(zq/g 7 00CKETED uw foo% kkpd + 30 to Em
..S 6.L, 4 87 SEP 17 R2:15.
1986 HCM:
UNSIGNAL
- * * * * * * *, * * * * * * * * * * *I Z E DINTER 5ECTION
- ++*********+***S* + + + * * * * * * *;* '* * * * *
- 4 * * * * * *
- P 1DENTIFYING INFCRMAT
... --............... ION..........................................--..:
AVERAGE RUNNING EFEED. MAJOR STREET,.............
55 l7 FEAK HOUR FAC*CR.................................
A R E A PCF UL A T I ON.....................
............. 1300000 NAME OF THE E MT/ WEST STREET...............'..... i Rt e ::.7 NAME OF THE NORTH / SOUTH STREET...............
yAPBesed Agwy S E Rut.i NAME OF THE ANALY3T.....
........................ BG_.
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................
04/21/57 TIME PERIOD AN/LYEED............................. 0700-1000 INTERSECTION TYFE
......... - -......AN D C ONT ROL INTERSEC7ICN TYPEt T-INTER 3ECTION MAsCR STREET DIRECT:CN SAST/ WEST-CON TF.01 v M N'8 T' GOUNO: $ TOP SIGN.
TR U F IO VOLUME 5 E3 WB NB S2 LEFT C
0 o
THRU T91 0
0 RIGHT
\\
C 0
e.7 0 NUMEER 0F LANES EB WB-NB-SB' LANES
.4...
2 2
1 Used 2/3 of Rte.
computer program alloi.*,g only 2 lanes 27 Eastbound traffic.-to correct for the The results correIate 8709280277 870729 with analysis done:by hand.-for the major street.
P
- o PDR Q
ADOCK 05000322 b
PDR 2
7-20-07 F# R Z 14 : 1 1 KLD A s a c. c..
I n c..
p,g3
/
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
......................--...---........---..--....-~~.*..-~....Page-i FERCENT RIGHT TURN CURD RADIUS ((t)
ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS
}
EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 4
f N
WESTBOUND 0.00 90 i
20 N~
NORTHE OUND 0,06 59 60 t,
N SOUTHECUND 1
VEHICLE COMFCSITION l
]
j
". SU TRUCKS
% COMBINATION 4
AND RV'S VEHICLES
% MOTORCYCLES 1
EASTeouto o
)
e o
WESTJOUND 0
0 0
NORTH 20UND Q
Q Q
3OUTHG0VND CRITICAL SA09 ATAEULAR VALUE6 ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST.
FINAL (Tstfe 10-2)
VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITIC AL (
MINCR RIGHTS 440 g.3 a p
ND W
- 4. -C-f1 O.00 5.50 Sjf3 L
MAJOR LEFTS
(. o u we w
33, u
o.c0 5.e0 MINCR LEFTS e.3J g,co NB M
. 9 0.00 0.00
.O e
ami 4
e I
e 7-24-87 FRI 14 : 1 1 KLD Assoc.
Inc.
F=. e 4 t
I CAFACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE pg.;,.; )
4 POTEN-A~TUAL s
FLOW-TIAL 70VEMENT SHARED RESEFvE RATE CAPACITV. CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVDlINT v t :.c p h ) e <peph)
- (pcph) c (pcph) c = c v
Lc ;
p M
SH R
SH j
MINCE STREET NC LEFT C
177 177 177 177 y N
671
-75
- F RIGHT 747 671) c71 671
-75 >
I :.
t w./
~.-
j MAJOR STREET h
.hh
- ,h!"y l*' :
l n=
1 i
'l 1
I l
~.
i I
0
7 - 2 4 -. e 7 FFI 14 : a2 KLD f.e o c c, c.
Inc.
P. O5 i
i Soveral more bugs have been Icund in the HCS. They are tummarized i
by module be10w; HIGHWAY 1
s;gnanzed(Disk 3)
CAPACITY j
SOFTWARE 1.
The statement in the HELP r,creen of the phase plan should say 7here are no (insert no) right turrVpedestrian conflicts.* Please make a note of this.
2.
HCS NOTES The bug reponed in our HCS Note of February 9,1987, also applies to T intersections and one-way streets. If you anaYze one of these and get the ' inconsistent volume / phasing
- error,
- 3 you will have to enter *X's in the phasing plan for movements that February 23,1987 do not actually ex!st, until the error routine is ' satisfied.'
3.
The program will not handle 6 lanes on any approach. Unta the problem is fixed you can get around this by reducing the number l
cf tanes and volume. For example,if you have 21ett tum lanes,3 j
thrus and 1 right, reduce the thru lanes to 2 and the volume to 1
2/3 of the actual. Enter the data as usual. On the Volume Adjustment Werksheet, change the Lane Utilization Factor for the aff ected thru from 1.05 to 1.10, then manually recalculate the
{
approach delay by volume weighting the individuallane group
(
delays by the actual (i.e., total) volumes. To do this multiply the average delays per movement by the total volumes per roovement, add these total delays up and divide by the Idal j
volume. Do this for all approaches affected and the total interseccon to get a correct intersection LOS.
4.
There is an error in the ;il routine. The g/c for eastbound and I
~
westbaund is wror g on the hard copy printout. The value on the
{
s.:Ltag and the fim' rae' 'M (e.g. delay and LOS) are correct on teth.
UnsignaEzed (Disk 4)
There are also errors in this:21 routine. The critical gap printed (i.e.,
1 the hard copy) is wrong. The value on the me is correct and the (kig!
{
ff. ids are correct on both. Also, eastbound and westbound beadings are switched on the hard ccpy for intersections with east west minor
{
streets. The numbers and LOS are correct, just the headings are wrong.
n
)
i I
i I
i
- e._ 2 4 b r F R 8.
A4 : 'S 3 KLD A**CC*
IbC '
F*
L
,' s
~
/Cd% ' 8 Ld'p hoM 'f 3dko 'bya.'
c j(o/6qrg._
m 1955 HCM:
UNS!$NALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pa
- ,*,***************e. ************************++++++***4*******++*ge-IDENTIFYING INFQF',MATION
...__............._ __..._________~_....___-__~~....._--~~--_ -~~.
AV~. RAGE RUNNING GFEED, M A.) OF. S T R O E T...,.......... 55 FC A K HOUR < F A C T C R................................. -. C 2 A A E A F 0F UL A T I ON............................. ~...... 1300Q00 NAME CS THE EAST /WEET-STREET..................... Rte 27 miAbow&esed fn-y NA.ME Cp THE NORTH /$00"H STREET......'.............
SB Ramp p
NArE CF THE ANA._V3T..............................,BG DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..................-04/Z1/87 T I M E r'C R I O D A N A L Y I E D.............................
1000-1300 INTEMSEOTICN TYFE AND CONTROL l
a INTER $EOTIGN TYPE: T-INTERSECTION-q i
j MAJGR STREET DIRECTICN: EA37/ WEST CCN**~CL TYPE NCRTrBOUND: 3TCP SIGN TMF~ I; VOLbMES EB W3 ND SO i
LEFT C
0 0
THRU 871 N Q
Q RIGHT C
O 732
2 1
Used 2/3 of Rte. 27 Eastbound traffic to correct for the computer program allowing only a lanes for theLma,jor strect.
The results correlate with analysisidone by hand.-
7-24-87 FRZ 14 : 2s KLD se s s o c..
Ine.
p.
e7 o
k ADJUSTMENT FACTCRS Fage-O FERCENT RIGHT TUCN CURS RADIUS (ft)
ACCELERATION LANE G R A Dt" ANGLE FQR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTEOUND O.00 90 EO N
WEST E.OUND O.00 50 20 N
1 NORTHCOUND O.00 09 d.O N
i SQUTHBOUND VEHICLE CCMFOSITICN
% SU TRUCKS
% COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES
% MOTORCYCLES EA5TSOUND 6
0 0
WEST 30UND 0
0 0
NORTHOGUND 0
0 0
SOUTHBOUND C R t T !?i+L O AF S TAOULAR VALUE3 ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST.
FINAL
( T a t. I e 10 ~;. )
VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL G AF,
MINOR RIGHTS g,fo f fo gc/
NE M1
-M' 7-0.00 5.50 Ld+
MAJOR LEFTS
$.0 0 j~ d o hgg
)
WB W
W.
0.00 5.50 MINCR LEFTS S.> o p.o d j
NB W
h40 0.00 G.00 i
w 4
l
I 7-24-e"7 FRI 84 : a4 KLD.
AoGoc.
Inc.
P. OS 6
CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-5ERVICE Page-l
......__.....................................___..................]
POTEN-ACTUAL l
FLOW-TIAL MOVEFENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v ( ci: c h ) c (peph) c (pcph) c (peph) c =
L( )
c' v
c.
M SH R
SH MINOR ETREET 3
3 ND LEFT C
154 154 154 154 >
647
> -149
>F RIGHT 706 647 647 647
-149 >-
MAJOP STPEET WB LEFT C
355 255 355 955 1
)
I 1
1
'l
]
~ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _
I 7-24-e7 rRI s4 : 1s x t_ n a s o c c. -
Enc-P.
e9 A
Several more bugs have been found in the HCS. They are summarized by module below:
HIGHWAY Sigh (Disk 3)
CAPACITY l
SOFTWARE 1.
The statement in the HELP screen of the phase plan should say f
"There are no (insert no) right tum/ pedestrian confricts." Please i
make a note of this.
HCS NOTES The bug reported in our HCS Note of February 9,1987, also 2.
applies to T intersections and one way streets. If you analy:e one of these and get the " inconsistent volume / phasing' error, j
s3 you will have to enter 'Xs in the phasing plan for movements that do not actually exist, until the error routine is " satisfied."
3.
The program will not handle 6 lanes on any approach. Unti the problem is fixed you can get around this by reducing the number of lanes and volume. For erample,if you have 2 tett tum tanes,3 thrus and I right, reduce the thru lanes to 2 and the volume to 2/3 of the actual. Enter the data as usual. On the Votume Adjustment Worksheet, change the Lane Utilization Factor for the i
affected th u from 1.05 te 1.10, then manually recalculate the approach delay by volume weighting the individual lane group delays by the 2 dual (i e., total) volumes. To do this multiply the averzgo delays per movement by the total volumes per movement, add these total delays up and divide by the Mit!
i volume. Do this for all approaches affected and the total intersection to get a correct intersection LOS.
4.
There is an error in the 2,1 routine. The s'c for eastbound and westbound is wrong on the hard copy printout. The value on the 11,n and the finM muHs (e g. delay and LOS) are correct on i
both.
1 UnsignatLed (Disk.t)
There are als.o errors in this c2t routine. The critical gap printed (i.e.,
j the hard copy) is wrong. The value en the gata is correct and the finnrJ ignds are correct on both. Also, eastbound and westbound beadings are switched on the hard copy for intersections with east west minor streets. The numbers ard LOS are correct,just the headings are wrong.
i S
_________w
=
l 7-24-e7 FRI 24 : 2O K 6. D 4osoc.
I r. c.-
P. O Z.
/o0 % B% n.M + 30 'e L, m. b 6 N ur; j
I lii", HCMt UNSIGNALIZED INTEF5ECTIONS Ps
..........,***.........++.e****....n****+44****e.....s..****,....je.
I IDENTIFYING INFORMATION j
l
..............................,............................1 i
J 1
A JER A GE R UNNI NG EFEID, M A J C R STREET.,........... 55 l
PEAK HOUR FACTOR.................................
.95 4REA GO ULATION...................,
1300000 N A ME Gi" THE C A '5 T / L E S T S T F. E E T.....................
Rte ~7
(
NAME OF THE NOR TH / SOUTH S TR EE T................... MEMe wsto.g pot.,,y l
5B Ramp
[
[
NAMC QF TwE ANALYST..............................
E'6 I
i DATE CC THE ANALYSIS ( r m / d d / yy ).................. 04/21/97 T i m E F E F 10 D A N A L Y.T E D.............................
1*s00-1600 i
1 INTEF 9EC T!ON TYPE AND CQNTROL I NTER SEC.T I ON TY5E: T-INTERSECTION 1
l MAJCA STr4qr p I.s g.. T I ON : EAST / WEST l
f CONTECL TYTE NORT 4 0LND: $TC4 SIGN l
1 1
7: AFFIC VC LUME5 EB WD NB SB LEFT 0
0 0
THRU 107+*
O o
RIGHT O
O T47 NUMEER QF LAMES EB WB NB SB
.[f LANE 5 2
2 1
l l
Used 2/3 of Rte. 27 Eastbound traffic to correct for the ecmputer program allowing only 2 lanes for the major street.
The results correlate with analysis done by hand.
r -- 2 4 - e r FRI 14 : 21 KLD pa a a o c.
I re c.
P. O4 i
i ADJUSTMENT FACTORS P a g e.':
......s.....-_.-----
FERCENT RIGHT TURN CURO RADIUS (ft)
ACCELERATION LANE i
GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURN 3 FOR RIGHT TURNS l
EAST 3GUND O 00 90 20 N
WEST 50uND 0.00 00 2.0 N
NORTHBOUND O.00 t.9 c,0 N
SOUTHFOUND VEHICLE COMPCSITICN
% SU TRUCKS
-% COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES-
% MOTORCYCLES EA3TBOUND 9
0 0
WESTSOUND 0
Q Q
NORTHEOUND C
0 0
50uTMSOUND l
l CRITIC AL.G A S TADULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST.
FINAL (T1bie 10-0. )
VALLE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP l MINCR RIGHTS G io f go NO W
W O.00 5.50 bot MA'JOR LEFTS
(. c o Ofo l
h W3 W
CM O.00 5. ".O l,T b%
D MINOR LEFTS p (O S c'd j
NB
?7 W
O.00 S.00 l
i
)
I i
1
~
s 7-24-e7 FRI 14 =22 KLD AsOcc.
Inc.
Po 05 a
i j
CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-G POTEN-ACTUAL I
FLOW-TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED TIESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY i
MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (ptph) c (pcph) c (peph) c = c
-v LOS )
p M
SH R
SH l
---l 1
MINOR STREET NB LEFT o
104 104 104 164 >
D; 578
> -313
>F RIGHT 992 579 570 578
-313 >
F s
i MAJOR STREET MB LEFT C
279 279 279 279 c
l l
~~ ~~~
1 7-24-87 FRI 14 : 22 gtp p, g,.sc.
Inc*
P.06 o
Several more bugs nave been found in the HOS. They are summartzed
~-
by module below:
tj HIGHWAY Signati-m pisk 3) a CAPACITY l
SOFTWARE 1.
Tne statement in the HELP screen of the phase plan should say 7here are no (insert no) right turn / pedestrian conflicts.* Please y
make a note of this.
kh I'
2.
The bug reported in our HCS Note of February 9,1987, also HCS NOTES applies to T intersections and one way streets. If you analyze I
1 one of these and get the " inconsistent volume / phasing" error,
{
01
- 3 you will have to enter 'X's in the phasing plan for movements that 5
do not actually exist, until the error routine is ' satisfied."
February 23,1987 r
[.j 3.
The program will not handle 6 lanes on any approach. Unta the l
problem is fixed you can get around this by reducing the number of lanes and volume. For example, if you have 2 left tum lanes 3 thrus and 1 right, reduce the thru lanes to 2 and the vo!Ume to L
2/3 of the actual. Enter the data as usual. On the Volume Adjustment Worksheet, change the Lane Uti!!zation Factor for the affected thru from 1.05 to 1.10, then manually recalculate the approach delay by volume weighting the Individual lane group delays by the actual (i.e., total) volumes. To do this multiply the average delays per movement by the total volumes per movement, add these total delays up and divide by the 10121 votume. Do this for all approaches affected and the total intersection to get a correct intersection LOS.
4 There is an error in the RMt routine. The g/c for eastbound and westbcund is wrong on the hard copy printout. The value on the m and the firal reet?s (e.g. detay and LOS) are correct on teth.
Unsignalized (Disk 4)
J l
There are also err;rs in this att routine. The critical gap printed (i.e.,
the hard cepy)is wrong. The value on the screen is correct and the I!aal i
results are correct on both. A!so, eastbound and westbound beadings
)
are switched on the hard copy for intersections with east west minor streets. The numbers and LOS are correct, just the headings are wrong.
1
I 7-24-87 FRI 14 : 1'6.KLD Acoco.
8nc.
P.
is SV w C, Ha us :
]60 'fo Scc lty ro
'+* 3050 1985 HCM:
UN5IGNALIIED INTERSECTIONS P3
- +***********+++++*********+*****4
+++++***
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET..............
55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.................................
.C1 AREA POPULATION..................................
13Q0Q00 NAME OF THE EAST / WEST STREET..................... Rte 27 YEMealuert Ptvy 1 NAME OF THE NORTH /SCUTH STREET................... SB Ramp r
NAME OF THE ANALY3T..............................
BG DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).................. 04/21/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED..............................
1600-1960 INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
-..------------...---------........-----....-----.......---_... i l
INTER 5ECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION j
MAJOR STREET DIFECTION: EA3T/ WEST CONTROL TYPI NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VQLUMES 4
E5 WD NB SS LEFT C
0 Q
THRU
.1228 b O
O RIGHT C
0 1088 NUMBER OF LANE 3 EB WB NB SB
.i
'l LANES 2
2 1
d Used 2/3 of Rte. 27 Eastbound traffic to correct for the computer program allowing only 2 lanes for the major street.
The results correlate with enetvele dana hohnd.
7-24-87 F R I.
14 : 16_ - K L D Assoc.
Inc.,
--P. 1 1
^
1
-1 l,
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Pa pe-;
PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURE RADIUS (ft). ACCELERATION LANE GRADE-ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURN 3 FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND O.oo~
90 20
-N.
s WESTDOUND O.0C' 90 20 N
NORTHBOUND 0.00 59 so N
l I
SQUTHGOUND l-l l
VEHICLE COMPOSITION-f I
- /. SU TRUCKS
%' COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES
% MOTORCYCLES l
EASTBOUND 8
0 0
I i
WESTBOUND G
O Q
f i
NORTHBOUND 0
0 Q
SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS l
TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST.
FINAL (Tibie 10-2)
VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL'GAf l
MINOR RIGHTS
( a"o 5 5o NB W
6
-Q,QQ.
5.50 Sb U MAJOR LEFTS
' (,, c o g,fo g\\,.
WB
% t-0..;"
O.00 5.50 MINOR LEFTS f3o 8,cd NB
'e 76 0.00-S.00-
)
0 7-24-87 FR3 14 : 19 KLD AO5oc.
8nc.
p, gg 6'
l 1
1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-FOTEN-ACTUAL FLOW-TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(peph) c (pcph) c (pcph).
c (peph) c = c
-v Lo p
M SH R
SH MINOR STREET l
NB LEFT o
70 70 70 70 >
y 503
> -693
>F RIGHT 1196 503 503 503
-693 >
1 MAJOR STREET WD LEFT Q
- os 203 103 203 l
l l
l l
i l
l l
l l
4
a Y-24-87 FRI 24 : 19 KLD Asaoc.
Inc P.O2 l '. "
by module below:Several more bugs have been found in T
HIGHWAY
{
h CAPACITY signalized (Disk 3)
O SOFTWARE i
1.
The statement in the HELP screen of the phase pla f
'There are no (insert no) right turrVpedestrian conflicts." Pl make a note of this.
{
g HCS NOTES 2.
The bug reported in our HCS Note of February 9,1987, also applies to T intersections and one-way streets. If you anal f
h]j one of these and get the " inconsistent volume / phasing
- er
- 3 do not actually exist, until the error routine 4
February 23,1987 3
3.
The program will not handle 6 lanes on any approach. Un problem is fixed you can get around this by reducing the num of lanes and votume. For example,if you have 2 left tum thrus and 1 right, reduce the thru lanes to 2 and the volume 2/3 of the actual. Enter the data as usual. On the Adjustment Worksheet, change the Lane Utilization Fac affected thru from t.05 to 1.10, then manually recalculate the delays by the actualapproach delay by volume weighting average delays per m(ove, ment by the total movement, add these total delays up and divide by the ig!.al volume. Do this for all approaches affected and the total intersection to get a correct intersection LOS.
4.
There is an error in the c&l rcutine. The g/c for eastbound westbcund is wrong on the hard cepy printout. The value on t m.a,,3 and the fino r"uh (e g. delay and LOS) are correct on both.
Unsignalized(Disk 4)
There are also errors in this :
21 routine. The critical gap printed (i.e.,
the hard copy) is wrong. The value on the screen is co resu'ts are correct on both. Also, eastbound and westbour are switched on the hard copy for intersections with east-west m streets. The numbers and LOS are correct, just the head I
1 l
i l