ML20235D616
| ML20235D616 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 07/02/1987 |
| From: | Burdette W, De Reitzes F, Mccarty M TEX-LA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE OF TEXAS, INC. (FORMERLY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235D618 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#387-3959 OL, NUDOCS 8707100238 | |
| Download: ML20235D616 (3) | |
Text
]
[h 1
1 D
00CKETE0
- M UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'87 JL -7 P 1 Z0 Before the
>n i
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL-BOARD In the Matter of:
)
)
Docket Nos. 50-445-OL TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC
)
50-446-OL COMPANY, INC., et al.
)
)
(Comanche P67.k Steam Electric)
Station, Units and 2)
)
i Notice of Special Appearance Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. S 2.713(b), the undersigned attorneys enter their special appearance in the above-captioned matter and in connection therewith provide the following information:
Nr.ws :
William H. Burchette Foster De Reitzes Michael N. McCarty Address:
Heron, Burchette, Ruckert
& Rothwell Suite 700 1025 Thomas Jefferson St., N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20007 Telephone:
(202) 337-7700 Name and Address I
of Party:
Tex-La Electric Cooperative of Texas, Inc.
P.O. Box 1623 i
Nacogdoches, Texas 75963 8707100238 B70702 PDR ADOCK 05000445' G
PDR i
w '
. ADMISSIONS:
William H. Burchette:
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of North Carolinn Foster De Reitzes:
New York Court ;f Appeals, District of Columbia Court of AppeclG Michael N. McCart;y:
District of Columbia Court of Appeals These special appearances are being entered soley for the purpose of representing the interests of applicant Tex-La Electric Cooperative of Texas, Inc.
(" Tex-La") in connection with matters raised in a pleading filed June 19, 1987 by applicant Texas Utilities Electric Company ("TUEC") and styled as " Applicant Texas Utilities Electric Company's Petition for Directed Certification of LicenEing Board Order of March 12, 1987."
Generally, Tex-La has been represented in these licensing proceedings by the attorneys responsible for prosecuting the operating license application on behalf of all the joint owner-applicants.
In the instant matter, however, a discovery dispute has arisen in which there is
. l evident disagreement between applicants TUEC and Tex-La.
The attorneys prosecuting the joint license application have elected to represent TUEC exclusively in the subject discovery matter, thereby necessitating a special appearance by the undersigned counsel on behalf of Tex-La.
Respectfully submitted,
/MM(
%A4A m
~
fM//d"
~
v Dated:
July 2, 1987 1
1
)
1