ML20235D616

Notice of Special Appearance.* Wh Burchette,F De Reitzes & Mn Mccarty Enter Special Appearance Re Util 870619 Pleading for Directed Certification of ASLB 870312 Order

ML20235D616
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	07/02/1987
From:	Burdette W, De Reitzes F, Mccarty M TEX-LA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE OF TEXAS, INC. (FORMERLY
To:
Shared Package
ML20235D618	List: ML20235D616 ML20235D657
References
CON-#387-3959 OL, NUDOCS 8707100238
Download: ML20235D616 (3)

Text

]

1

[h ,

1 D

00CKETE0

• M UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '!

'87 JL -7 P 1 Z0 Before the

>n i ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL-BOARD In the Matter of: )

) Docket Nos. 50-445-OL TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC ) 50-446-OL COMPANY, INC., et al. )

)

(Comanche P67.k Steam Electric)

Station, Units and 2) )

i Notice of Special Appearance Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. S 2.713(b), the undersigned attorneys enter their special appearance in the above-captioned matter and in connection therewith provide the following information:

Nr.ws : William H. Burchette Foster De Reitzes Michael N. McCarty Address: Heron, Burchette, Ruckert

& Rothwell Suite 700  !

1025 Thomas Jefferson St., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20007 Telephone: (202) 337-7700 Name and Address I of Party: Tex-La Electric Cooperative of Texas, Inc.

P.O. Box 1623 Nacogdoches, Texas 75963 i 8707100238 B70702 PDR ADOCK 05000445' G PDR i

w '

I ADMISSIONS:

William H. Burchette:

District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of North Carolinn Foster De Reitzes:

New York Court ;f Appeals, District of Columbia Court of AppeclG Michael N. McCart;y:

District of Columbia Court of Appeals  ;

These special appearances are being entered soley for the purpose of representing the interests of applicant Tex-La Electric Cooperative of Texas, Inc. (" Tex-La") in connection with matters raised in a pleading filed June 19, 1987 by applicant Texas Utilities Electric Company ("TUEC") and styled as " Applicant Texas Utilities Electric Company's Petition for Directed Certification of LicenEing Board Order of March 12, 1987."

Generally, Tex-La has been represented in these licensing proceedings by the attorneys responsible for prosecuting the operating license application on behalf of all the joint owner-applicants. In the instant matter, however, a discovery dispute has arisen in which there is

l evident disagreement between applicants TUEC and Tex-La. The attorneys prosecuting the joint license application have elected to represent TUEC exclusively in the subject discovery matter, thereby necessitating a special appearance by the undersigned counsel on behalf of Tex-La.

Respectfully submitted,

/MM( ~

%A4A m fM//d" v

~

Dated: July 2, 1987 1

1

)

1