ML20234E625

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Deviation from Insp on 870615-0702.Deviation Noted:Preventive Maint Program & Maint Work Request Program Failed to Meet FSAR Requirements in Certain Areas
ML20234E625
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 09/17/1987
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20234E605 List:
References
50-498-87-41, 50-499-87-41, NUDOCS 8709220454
Download: ML20234E625 (1)


Text

. ,

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF DEVIATION Houston Lighting & Power Company Dockets: 50-498 South Texas Project 50-499 Permits: CPPR-128 CPPR-129 Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on June 15 through July 2, 1987, a deviation of your Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) was identified.

The deviation consisted of failure of the maintenance program to meet the FSAR quality requirements. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the deviation is listed below:

3ection 3.2 of the South Texas Project FSAR, Amendment 61, requires systems important to safety such as fire protection, radwaste, post-accident monitoring, qualified display processing, and similar equipment important to safety systems and components to have quality requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, or QA requirements of the NRC branch technical positions imposed on the aforementioned systems.

In deviation from the above, the preventive maintenance (PH) program and the maintenance work request (MWR) program failed to meet the FSAR requirements in certain areas. In particular, some compnents identified on equipment lists as Quality Class 9 within the fire protection system were not treated as quality related in regard to PMs and FNRs.

(498/8741-~01; 499/8741-01)

Houston Lighting & Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to this Office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply, should include for each deviation:

(1) the reason for the deviation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have ,

been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further deviations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending ,

the response time. j l

\

l Dated at Arlington, Texas, I this /7 fd day of f mjet 1987.

1 l

8709220454 070917 I PDR ADOCK 05000498 I O PDR }

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . )