ML20234E271
| ML20234E271 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 12/29/1987 |
| From: | Stello V NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Delay T HOUSE OF REP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20234E274 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8801080003 | |
| Download: ML20234E271 (11) | |
Text
_
ce-997 9 -
DEC 2 91987 l
The' Honorable Tom Delay Member, United States House of Representatives 500 North Chenango Street, Suite 312 Angleton, Texas 77515
Dear Congressman Delay:
Thikis in response to your letter of November 25, 1987,' in regard to a.
y request,fromfr., Daniel.R. Lighter concerning his termination from the,;Southh Texastfluclear: Project -(STNP) for refusing to take a drug screening' test.
In August-1986, the Commission published a Policy Statement on Fitness for Duty of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel. That statement expresses the Commission's expectations that operating reactor licensees will take all reasonable precautions to ensure that drug use does not adversely impact the safe operation of nuclear power plants and the public safety. All utilities-which operate nuclear power plants have committed to the establishment of fitness-for-duty programs which meet standaras developed for the industry by the Edison Electric Institute. At a minimum, an acceptable fitness-for-duty program at a nuclear power plant should include effective drug monitoring and testing procedures to provide reasonable assurance that personnel with access to vital areas of the plant'are fit for duty..
I encourage the use of effective drug testing niethods. that are consistent with Constitutional safeguards, as an element of comprehensive fitness-for-duty programs, to make sure that nuclear pcwer plant personnel are and remain free from the effects of drug use.
Licensees may choose to establish and administer proper and effective pre-employment, annual, for cause, accident, random, and other drug testing programs for their employees and contractors with unescorted access to their. nuclear power plants.
~
Sincerely.
Originni signo4 W Victor Stello.
Victor Stello, Jr.
Executive Director for Operations 8801000003 871229-PDR ADOCK 05000498 P
PDR l
- DISTRIBUTION TMurley JSniezek FMiraglia ADT FG111espie CThomas JBlaha DMossburg RSGB R/F DRIS R/F L8ush RErickson JPartlow MMcAllister(EDC#003345)
AThomas RMartin R IV VStello NRC PDR Central Files 0CA SECY 1387 EDO 3345 EDO r/f oen
/
p/ 9 n
- SEE PREVIOUS PAGE FOR CONCURRENCE liFC: RSGB
- RSGB
- TECH ED :DRIS
- A/ADT
- DONRR
- ED0 f!AME:LBush*
- RErickson*: AThomas*:JPartlow*:JSniezek*:TMurley* :VStello
{
DATE:12/15/87 :12/15/87 :12/15/87 :12/15/87 :12/21/87 :12/22/87 :17/ /87_
1 l
l
g{y & fSL_00A D a uc r
uq'o
. UNITED STATES
[
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
- j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655
\\...../
The Honorable Tom Delay Member, United States House of
'7 Representatives 500 North Chenango Street, Suite 312 Angleton, Texas 77515
Dear Congressman Delay:
This is in response to your letter of November 5, 1987, in regard to a request from Mr. Daniel R. Lighter concernin his termination from the South Texas Nuclear Project (STNP) for refusing take a drug screening test.
In August 1986, the Commission publis d a Policy Statement on Fitness for Duty of Nuclear Power Plant Personne. That statement expresses the Commission's expectations that ope ting reactor licensees will take all reasonable precautions to ensur hat drug use does not adversely impact the safe operation of nuclear powe lants and the public safety.
All utilities which operate nuclear power pl nts have committed to the establishment of fitness-for-duty programs which meet standards developed for the industry by the Edison Electric Institdte.
At a minimum, an acceptable fitness-for-duty program at a nuclear powdr plant should include effective drug monitoring and testing procedures /to provide reasonable assurance that personnel with access to vital areaf of the plant are fit for duty.
I encourage the use/ of effective drug testing methods that are consistent with Constitution'al safeguards, as an element of comprehensive fitness-for-duty programs,,to make sure that nuclear power plant personnel are and remain free fr'om the effects of drug use.
Licensees may choose to establish and administer proper and effective pre-employment, annual, for cause, accident, 7andom, and other drug testing programs for their employees and contract es with unescorted access to their nuclear power plants.
I ho this brief description of fitness-for-duty programs in the nuclear ind6stry is responsive to your request and addresses Mr. Lighter's concern.
Sincerely, Victor Stello, Jr.
Execut.ive Director for Operations
__g.
DISTRIBUTION TMurley JSniezek FMiraglia ADT FGillespie CThomas JBlaha DMossburg RSGB R/F DRIS R/F LBush RErickson JPartlow MMcAllister (EDC #003345) i AThomas RMartin R IV VStello NRC"PDR l
Central Files 0CA (3)
SECY (1387)
DMorris (ED0-003345)
OCA 1
- SEE PREVIOUS PAGE FOR CONCURRENCE q
0FC: R$GB
- RSGB
- TECH ED :DRIS
- A/AD
- DONRR
- EDO 7___p,_____jW. ___________
NAME: LBush*
- RErickson*: AThomas :JP t ow :JS fe ek :Titurley :VStello DAEI$2/$58
$2/58
/
/b kJ)%/8Y
/
8
/ /8 a
The Honorable Tom Delay Member, United States House of Representatives 500 N. Chenango Suite 312 Angleton, Texas 77515
Dear Congressman Delay:
This is in response to your letter of November 25, 1987, in regard to a request from Mr. Daniel R. Lighter concerning his texinination from the South Texas Nuclear Project (STNP) for refusing to take,a' drug screening test.
In August 1986, the Commission published a Poljc/y Statement on Fitness for Duty of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel.
That, statement expresses the Commission's expectations that operating rea'ctor licensees will take all reasonable precautions to ensure that drug'use does not adversely impact the safe operation of nuclear power plants arid the public safety.
All utilities which operate nuclear power plants have' committed to the establishment of fitnessfordutyprogramswhichmee/t<ttandards developed for the industry by the Edison Electric Institute.
/
The industry programs include drdg testing as a condition for employment, i.e., refusal to take a test is' grounds for denial or termination of employment.
Tests are administered before employment and in cases where there is cause to indicate the pos'sibility of drug involvement.
In addition, some utilities have established' programs which include periodic or randomly scheduled testing, as don'e at SINP.
/
On December 1, 1987,,the Commission requested that the staff prepare a proposed rule that would require all licensees to conduct random testing for drugs.
Such testing is regarded as an effective means of detecting and preventing drug ab'use, which is particularly important to assure public safety by the nuclear n'dustry.
I hope this b,rlef description of fitness for duty programs in the nuclear industry isf esponsive to your request and addresses Mr. Lighter's concern.
Sincerely, Victor Stello, Jr.
Executive Director for Operations i
DISTRIBUTION TMurley/JSniezek JBlaha RErickson FMiraglia DMossburg JPartlow ADT RSGB rf MMcAllister (ED0 #003345)
FGillespie DRIS rf VStello CThomas LBush E
R'WlN-l'I N
W 4TTENW A: ADT OFC: RSGB
- RSGB
- TectFEd VDRIS
.40HRfb-
- DONRR
- EDC NAME: LBush
- REr son: AThomas :JPartlow :JSniezek :TMurley :VStello Biiiy wi; w ;;;is si;~ T );;n T );; T is;~ T ia;~
p
~
[
o UMITED STATES j
./
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
?
aE WASHING TON, D. C. 20555 O
t b
\\,...../
{y gu p
The Honorable Tom Delay Member, United States House of 500 N/,Ch'ptatives gytdC Represp S
enangof uite 312 Angleton, Texas 77515
[ p\\fg> J t
Dear Congressman Delay:
This is in response to your letter of November 25, 1987; in regard to a request from Mr. Daniel R. Lighter concerning his termination from the South Texas Nuclear Project (STNP) for refusing to take a drug screening test.
In August 1986, the Commission published a Policy Statement on Fitness for Duty of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel.
That statement expresses the Commission's expectations that operating reactor licensees will take all reasonable precautions to ensure that drug.use does not adversely impact the safe operation of nuclear power plants and the public safety.
All utilities which operate nuclear power plants have committed to the establishment of fitness for duty prograrcs which meet standards develo df the industry by the Edison Electric Institute. + 44 T-> L -0 s
j
..__.-~-~_.7 s
l The industry. programs include drug testing as a condition for employment,
~
6 i.e., refusal t6~take a.~ test is grounds for denial or termination.of '
h,t/
j' employment.is cause to indicate the possibility of drug involvement. ' In addition, some
/
Tests are administered before employment and in cases where there 9
[
utilities have established programs which fnclude; periodic or randomly
~
g scheduled testing, as done'at STNP.
^
~s OnDecember1,1987,theCommissionrequestedthatthestaffpredarea proposed rule that would require all licensees to conduct random testing for,
drugs.
.5uch. testing is regarded as an effective means of detecting and i
preventing drug abuse, which is particularly important to assure public safety f
[ by the nuclear industry.
j w.~.,....-
I hope this brief description of fitness for duty programs in the nuclear industry is responsive to your request and addresses Mr. Lighter's concern.
Sincerely, Victor Stello, Jr.
Executive Director for Operations
.--.b
ges.hNR
~
~
c 20066 DEC 231986
,,, 50-206 50-361 and 50-362/f Mr. HowAhd' P. AITN ve Off cer Chairman an,d t'!1ef 4xetu 3
n Com y
Southern Califor it' Edi nut Gr e Avepue c2244' f
/
7 P /. Box / altforni~/
8
/
9 Rosemea
Dear Mr. Allen:
11y yy sup ort for any drug f
mplement'ed fo)to convey. orma 3d Fti4he" polic is-Thepurposeof,tfs_letterf f
2 l
ram:
testin m[
nt on F)tnessf or Duty.d NucianJLnwr Plant P cyditet&~~'phntribte tors thA f
and a
l d " effective 19 fitness for duty program at a nuclear power plant should inc u e (en osa FA
[PugmonitoFingandtestingprocedurestoprovidereasonable
/
^
fit for duty.
personnel with. access to vital areas of the' plant are nggi 't r-1 4 that_
mtep=}~2reca Whj.'g%kd;%. hrnM..;14jrbpl r=~&WI?,a :t..;;?I&.uu%r ~
~
4 r
an
-wf W iem A
/
o m as439=reacL,;; W " M W 2 b c M aI encourage the use of C:
e-licens M titutieset-end jTie~cEve drug testing methods % as an element of comp
> p TMH 2W:
bMelb*h*v.
/
- t%%3 l are and remain free
/
programs, to make sure that nuclear power plant personne1.icensees e
cident, random, and proper and effective pre-employment, annual, for cause, acd cont from the effects of drug use.
other drug testing programs for their employees an4 their nuclear power i
access to citM ra" di the: identification f,
It is_noted that-yottr-currt!rit7esting programs ~h'aye resulte n:
~ ~ to ili tIO ares.
I' endo and-stiEport'7
~
ng'a'nddesting of drug,use by some pejrsons with-acce)to_implemint a drug-sfre s
s Southernlalifortif a..E;dison!,5 efforts /progFam~jo~b7 re tmmissio s_
iv 6
expectaf.Jo,ns.
Sincerely,
/
1ctor Stello r.
Executive Director for Operations
Enclosure:
Policy Statement t
--WWm' AM w.w #w p
e e
-.e w
we--w Mme --
-memy e
_,[
- {
~
' ~~~~ 4,. A. ~
~
7 1
. - c9 UNITED STATES p [1 g,{M (
fg p,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1
e
.. E WASHINGTON. D, C. 20655 hh The Honorable Tom Delay Member, United' States House of Representative 500 N FEhenango Ihe'312 Angleton,. Texas 77515
- (b 3 t
Dear Congressman Delay':
This~is in response to your letter of November 25, 1987, in regard'to a request from Mr. Daniel R. Lighter concerning his termination from the South Texas Nuclear Project (STNP) for refusing to take a drug screening test.
j In August 1986, the Commission published a Policy Statement on Fitness for l
Duty of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel.
That statement :xpresses the Commission's. expectations that operating reactor licennos will take all reasonable precautions to ensure that drug use does not adversely impact the safe operation of nuclear. power plants and the public~ safety.
All utilities which operate nuclear power plants have committed to the establishment of fitness-for-duty programs which meet standards developed for the industry by the Edison Electric Institute.
'4The industry programs include drug testing as a condition for employment,-
. gd gL evy refusal to take a test is grounds for denial or termination of employment.
Tests are administered before employment and in cases where there is cause to indicate the possibility of drug. involvement.
In addition, some utilities have established programs which include periodic or randomly scheduled testing, as done at STNP.
On December 1, 1987, the Commission requested that the staff prepare a l
proposed rule that would require all licensees to conduct random testing for l
drugs.
Such testing is regarded as an effective means.of detecting and preventing drug abuse, which is particularly important to q#'sure public safety; by-the nut 9 ear-industry, g/;
I hope this brief description of fitness-for duty programs in the nuclear
-industry is responsive to your request and addresses Mr. Lighter's concern.
Sincerely, Victor Stello, Jr.
Executive Director for Operations
/
'o UNITED STATES l
f" NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
n
{
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%...../
The Honorable Tom Delay Member, United States House of Representatives 500 North Chenango Street, Suite 312 Angleton, Texas 77515
Dear Congressman Delay:
1 This is in response to your letter of November 25, 1987, in regard to a i
request from Mr. Daniel R. Lighter concerning his termination frota the South l
Texas Nuclear Project (STNP) for refusing to take a drug screening test.
1 In August 1986, the Commission published a Policy Statement on Fitness for
(
Duty of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel.
That statement expresses the l
Commission's expectations that operating reactor licensees will take all reasonable precautions to ensure that drug use does not adversely impact the safe operation of nuclear power plants and the public safety.
All utilities l
which operate nuclear power plants have committed to the establishment of fitness-for-duty programs which meet standards developed for the industry by the Edison Electric Institute.
At a minimum, an acceptable fitness-for-duty program at a nuclear power plant should include effective drug monitoring I
and testing procedures to provide reasonable assurance that personnel with access to vital areas of the plant are fit for duty.
I encourage the use of effective drug testing methods that are consistent with Constitutional safeguards, as an element of comprehensive fitness-for-duty programs, to make sure that nuclear power plant personnel are and remain free from the effects of drug use.
Licensees may choose to establish and administer proper and effective pre employment, annual, for cause, accident, random, and other drug testing programs for their employees and contractors with unescorted access to their nuclear power plants.
h hope t)i b ief desc io of fitn or duty pr s n the nuclear ih, fus is r pon ' e to yot-r est and a es Mr. Li hter's ern.
d Sincerely, Victor Stello, Jr.
Executive Director for Operations
~
.s
'f pe rso6 g, [ (' j/
g.
['
.'4 jo UNITED STATES.
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
n WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
' %,.....,o f
h*
j i
EDO PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL 1
FROM:
'DUE: 12/22/87 EDO CONTROL: 003345 DOC DT 11/25/87'
~ REP. TOM-DELAY FINAL REPLY:
TO:
OCA FOR SIGNATURE OF GREEN SECY NO: 1387 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DESC:
ROUTING:
ENCLOSES LETTER FROM DANIEL R.
LIGHTER CONCERNING RMARTIN TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT FROM STNP DATE: 12/08/87 ASSIGNED TO: NRR CONTACT: MURLEY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:
h REPLY TO ANGLETON,. TEXAS OFFICE.
S V
\\0 -
R&
V Y[I $N NRR RECEIVED: DECEMBER 8, 1987 ACTION:
g;1;DLPQ:.ROEl*
k NRR' ROUTING:
MURLEY/SNIEZEK ACTION MIRAGLIA ADT SM3/
DUE TO NRR DIRECTOR'S OFFlce BLAHA BY bMAB12=
M SSBURG
-a.-
2 12l/lf67 AECh $6(70 //:00 ant. W
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET PAPER NUMBER:
CRC-87-1387 LOGGING DATE: Dec 4 87 ACTION OFFICE:
EDO q
AUTHOR:
T.
Delay--Const Ref AFFILIATION:
U.S.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES LETTER DATE:
Dec 4 87 FILE CODE: ID&R-5 So Tx
SUBJECT:
Termination of employment from South Tex Nuc Plant ACTION:
Direct Reply DISTRIBUTION:
OCA to Ack SPECIAL HANDLING: None NOTES:
Daniel R.
Lighter DATE DUE:
Dec 18 87 SIGNATURE:
DATE SIGNED:
l AFFILIATION:
l l
l RWd 011. EDO
- ~~'
~ Jt3 -
@__h97 7-9 EDO --- 0033t45 M"J dl,_ __
?