ML20234C976

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Technical Assistance W/Review of Amend 58 to Fsar. Confirmatory Review by G Bryan Needed to Close Paperwork Loop
ML20234C976
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook 
Issue date: 04/17/1986
From: Matthews D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Essig T
Battelle Memorial Institute, PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATION
Shared Package
ML20234B686 List:
References
FOIA-87-346 NUDOCS 8709210474
Download: ML20234C976 (2)


Text

. _ _ _

'o UNITED STATES 3m ( g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I

E

  • g[\\ ^.

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 m

%; v...../

Docket No.

50 E/3 4 gk' MEMORANDUM FOR:

Thomas Essig, Section Manager Health Physics Technology Section Radiological Science Department, PNL FROM:

David B. Matthews, Chief Emergency Preparedness Branch s

Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE - NRC EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM PLANT NAME:

f69hk LICENSEE / APPLICANT: /DA /C gay,c r co, orevis</W W'M 4 r 2-Vf 65

/

EP REVIEWER:

d oev /'Ec a#N Please take action as indicated.

If you have any questions regarding the information, activity or schedule, contact the reviewer whose name is shown above.

1.

Area of Review 1.

(

)

Emergency Plan 2.

(

)

Dose calculation 3.

(

) Evacuation time estimates 4.

(

)

Prompt notification system 5.

(

)

Emergency Response Facilities 6.

Emergency Action Levels

'" G'!""% uS\\

AnoD, C V l0 fM'l II.

1.

(X) Radiological emergency plan (Rev4s4cn+

)

or applicable portions dated 2.

(x)

Implementing procedures Nos. E#- /,/ wi// 6e Orm rd/ !"b 3.

(

)

(DRAFT) Emergency Planning Evaluation Report (EPER) i sections

(,x ) %ssicn No MSY VS. EMSubmittal from the licensee / applicant dated f/t/A w M ~'g 4.

Chr A'< fen,a..

)

5.

(

) Meeting announcement 6.

(

)

Other 8709210474 870916 3

PDR FOIA CONNOR87-346 PDR v'

~

f+15'968['j N

1 I

l III. Scope of Activities:

1.

(

)

Conduct review for deficiencies and submit questions for clarification.

2.

(

)

Conduct review and submit evaluation'for preparation of input to EPER.

3.

(

)

Participate.in implementation appraisal ~ at the site.

4

(

Participate in exercise observation at the site.

5.

(

ReviewEPERinputandfurngcg

nts, pq-6.

(

Attend meeting b

'"*#"hg3, g 7 / m d,, I o g ficc /e /

OtherC8/mm 7.

(K a

Y h c/du M W ew nK: hop.

J IV.

Schedule 1.

(

)

Urgent:

Contact EP Reviewer upon receipt 2.

(

)

Provide response by 3.

(

)

Initiate meeting to discuss findings (10 working days prior to response date) 4

)

Site implementation review on 3/IV/&

5.

)

Exercise on 2 /t4/ts 6.

g)

Other fre be /ol.

Supplemental Information or Instructions de d/wwa' wN 7m 7*""'""

V.

ti/16 lt b E tt 1, 1 vo// bt formde d b Gord &L r,t d M WAen Wt fY y

  • f f;g

,' {

g7-gj'3of nln/ Jc.),e da /t wl// bt de h rinirs e

W 4 dicedh to Md*.

kaT

[hief a

mergency-Preparedness Branch Division of Emergency. Preparedness 9g 6 fM, and Engineering Response SNAs4 Office of Inspection and Enforcement EP Reviewer cg:J. Martin, PNL M. McClain, PNL EAW

e. w nia y, /1tv5 t f, NR R-

.)

'S,' 79.r k., 6 C D 479