ML20234C976

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Technical Assistance W/Review of Amend 58 to Fsar. Confirmatory Review by G Bryan Needed to Close Paperwork Loop
ML20234C976
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/17/1986
From: Matthews D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Essig T
Battelle Memorial Institute, PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATION
Shared Package
ML20234B686 List:
References
FOIA-87-346 NUDOCS 8709210474
Download: ML20234C976 (2)


Text

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

'o UNITED STATES

! 3m ( g; NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

  • g[\ ^ .

I

,, m E

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

%; v...../

Docket No. 50 E/3 4 gk' MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas Essig, Section Manager Health Physics Technology Section Radiological Science Department, PNL FROM: David B. Matthews, Chief Emergency Preparedness Branch s Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE - NRC EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM PLANT NAME: f69hk LICENSEE / APPLICANT: /DA /C gay,c r co, orevis</W W'M EP REVIEWER: d oev /'Ec a#N 4/r 2-Vf 65 Please take action as indicated. If you have any questions regarding the information, activity or schedule, contact the reviewer whose name is shown above.

1. Area of Review
1. ( ) Emergency Plan
2. ( ) Dose calculation
3. ( ) Evacuation time estimates
4. ( ) Prompt notification system
5. ( ) Emergency Response Facilities
6. Emergency Action Levels AnoD, C V l0 fM'l II. 1. (X) Radiological emergency plan (Rev4s4cn+ ) '" G'!""% uS\

or applicable portions dated

2. (x) Implementing procedures Nos. E#- /,/ wi// 6e Orm rd/ !"b
3. ( ) (DRAFT) Emergency Planning Evaluation Report (EPER) i sections
4. f/t/A w M ~'g

(,x ) %ssicn No MSY VS. EMSubmittal Chr A'<from fen,a.. the licensee / applicant dated

)

5. ( ) Meeting announcement
6. ( ) Other 8709210474 870916 3 PDR FOIA PDR CONNOR87-346 ,

v'

~

f+15'968['j N 1 I

l III. Scope of Activities:

1. ( ) Conduct review for deficiencies and submit questions for clarification.
2. ( ) Conduct review and submit evaluation'for preparation of input to EPER.
3. ( ) Participate .in implementation appraisal ~ at the site.

4 ( Participate in exercise observation at the site.

5. ( ReviewEPERinputandfurngcg nts, pq- .
6. *"

( Attend meeting b g 7 / m d ,, I o g ficc /e /

OtherC8/mm a Y '"*#"hg3,

7. (K h c/du M W ew J nK: hop.

IV. Schedule

1. ( ) Urgent: Contact EP Reviewer upon receipt
2. ( ) Provide response by
3. ( ) Initiate meeting to discuss findings (10 working days prior to response date) 4 ) Site implementation review on 3/IV/&
5. ) Exercise on 2 /t4/ts
6. g) Other fre be /ol.

V. Supplemental Information or Instructions de d/wwa' wN 7m 7*""'""

ti/16 lt b E tt 1, 1 vo// bt formde d b Gord &L r,t d eM WAen Wt fY y .

,' { g7- gj'3of nln/ Jc.),e da /t wl// bt de h&' rinirs *f f;g

  • W 4 dicedh to Md*.

a kaT [hief mergency-Preparedness Branch Division of Emergency. Preparedness 9g 6 fM, and Engineering Response SNAs4 Office of Inspection and Enforcement  !

EP Reviewer cg:J. Martin, PNL '

M. McClain, PNL EAW

e. w nia  ;

y, /1tv5 t f , NR R- .)

'S ,' 79.r k. , 6 C D 479