ML20217N996
| ML20217N996 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Michigan |
| Issue date: | 04/27/1998 |
| From: | Fleming R MICHIGAN, UNIV. OF, ANN ARBOR, MI |
| To: | Weiss S NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| 50-002-98-202, 50-2-98-202, NUDOCS 9805060028 | |
| Download: ML20217N996 (1) | |
Text
..
l MICHIGAN MEMORIAL -PHOENIX PROIECT gy PHOENIX MEMORIAL LABORATORY FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR
^"" ^"" "' "'C"icAN 48i n 2ioo o,,.o. a,w o,_
l April 27,1998 1
fb-2 l
Seymour Weiss, Director i
Non Power Reactors and Decommissioning Project Directorate Division of Reactor Program Management
)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Dr. Weiss:
At the Predecisional Enforcement Conference held at One White Flint North I
on April 22, 1998, the question was raised as to a 30 day written report, as per TS 6.6.2. (b.)(1.), due to you from our facility as a result of the
)
inspection of the FNR on February 23-27, 1998.
I I first became fully aware of the substantive variance that still existed in our TS when I read the Routine Safety inspection Report No. 50-002/98202 (DRPM), dated March 24, 1998, especially section 2.0 (1)
]
"10 CFR 50.59 Review" that begins on page 3. I gained further clarification in a phone conversation with our Inspector, Tom Burdick, on the morning of March 26, 1998. This was Tom's and my first opportunity to talk after the exit interview on February 27, 1998.
On April 2,1998, aware that we did indeed have a substantive TS variance, we submitted Amendment 44 to our License to the NRC. Ihad assumed that this satisfied our 30 day reporting requirement. If further reporting is necessary, please let me know and I will make the appropriate reports.
Sincerely,
\\
o
)
N
']
j Ronald F. Fleming, Director 9805060028 980427 PDR ADOCK 05000002 G
PDR l
Phone:(734) 764 6213 Fax:(734) 763-7863 www.umich.edu/~mmpp/