ML20217H314

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commission Voting Record on SECY-99-234 Re Request for Extension of Milestone for Final Rulemaking Package on 10CFR63 (Disposal of high-level Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada)
ML20217H314
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/19/1999
From: Vietticook A
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To:
Shared Package
ML20217H317 List:
References
REF-10CFR9.7 SECY-99-234-C, NUDOCS 9910220099
Download: ML20217H314 (2)


Text

.

a..................m..

l I

RELEASED TOTHE RDR l

8 4

j UNITED STA.ES p

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/O![ h eI g

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20655-0001 (jSt0 fryj[3b y

,%,..... f l

October 19,1999

    • C"^"'

COMMISSION VOTING RECORD DECISION ITEM:

SECY-99-234 TITLE:

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF MILESTONE FOR FINAL RULEMAKING PACKAGE ON 10 CFR PART 63 (DISPOSAL OF HIGH-LEVEL WASTE AT YUCCA MOUNTAIN, NEVADA) i The Commission (with Chairman Dieus and Commissioners McGaffigan and Merrifield agreeing)

{

. approved the subject paper. Commissioner Diaz approved in part and disapproved in part. The

]

final result is recorded in the Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) of October 19,1999.

This Record contains a summary of voting on this matter together with the individual vote sheets, views and comments of the Commission, and the SRM of October 19,1999.

b ~~'

)

~

' 'nnette \\lietti-Cook Secretary of the Commission Attachments:

1. Voting Summary
2. Commissioner Vote Sheets
3. Final SRM cc:

Chairman Dicus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan Commissioner Merrifield OGC EDO I

PDR i

DCS C@

\\

9910220099 991019 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR l

L.

e e

VOTING

SUMMARY

- SECY-99-234 l

RECORDED VOTES NOT APRVD DISAPRVD ABSTAIN PARTICIP COMMENTS DATE CHRM. DICUS X

X 10/14/99 COMR. DIAZ X

X X

10/1/99 COMR. McGAFFIGAN X

X 10/7/99 4

COMR. MERRIFIELD X

10/6/99 COMMENT RESOLUTION in their vote sheets, Chairman Dicus and Commissraars McGaffigan and Merrifield approved the paper. Commissioner Diaz approved in part and disapproved in part preferring to grant a two-month extension instead of the four months proposed by the staff. Subsequently, the comments of the Commission were incorporated into the guidance to staff as reflected in the i

SRM issued on October 19,1999, l

I