ML20217F446

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requests Technical Assistance for Development of Plant Sys SRP Chapter for mixed-oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility. Assistance Requires Peer Review Comments on First Draft of Cooling Water & Ventilated Sections
ML20217F446
Person / Time
Site: 07003098
Issue date: 10/14/1999
From: Pierson R
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Hannon J
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
References
TAC-L20356, NUDOCS 9910200321
Download: ML20217F446 (8)


Text

}

October 14,1999 MEMORANDUM TO:

John N. Hannon, Chiaf Plant Systems Branch Division of Systems Safety and Analysis, NRR FROM:

Robert C. Pierson, Chief signed by:

Special Projects Branch M. Galloway Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS

SUBJECT:

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANT SYSTEMS STANDARD REVIEW PLAN CHAPTER FOR THE MIXED-OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY The Special Projects Branch requests technical assistance for the following project:

Project: Technical assistance in development of the plant systems chapter of a standard review plan (SRP) for the mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility. The plant systems chapter is comprised of sections for each plant system such as cooling water, ventilation, electrical, etc.

Casework /RITS/ TAC Nos: 70-3098030S 211A0 L20356 MOX Standard Review Plan Reauested Action: The Enrichment Section of the Special Projects Branch is responsible for developing an SRP for the MOX Facility. In the plant systems chapter, Mr. Charlie Cox has primary responsibility for developing the cooling water section and Mr. Rex Wescott has the primary responsibility of developing the ventilation section. Where appropriate, my staff will be developing these sections to refer to current Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements and guidanco, if current published guidance is not available, the SRP section(s) will include a discussion providing that guidance.

I am requesting assistance from your staff on the MOX SRP plant systems chapter to provide peer review comments on the first draft of the cooling water and ventilation sections to ensure that the latest staff requirements and guidance are considered and included where appropriate.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated. The draft cooling water and ventilation sections are enclosed for your review. Your comments on these sections are requested by November 12, 1999.

Contact:

Lead, Fred Burrows, (301) 415-8110 Cooling Water Section, Charlie Cox, (301) 415-6755 Ventilation Section, Rex Wescott, (301) 415-6727 f

Docket: 70-3098 1

Enclosures:

1. MOX SRP section on cooling water
2. MOX SRP s cti yentilation d gc3 f f Distribution:

Docket: 70-3098 NRC File Center PUBLIC NMSS r/f FCSS r/f SPB r/f AByee G:\\SPB\\FHB\\MOX. memo.wpd

(*See previous concurrence)

OFC SPB E

SPB E

SPB E

SPB E

SPB SPB NAME

  • FBurrows:al
  • CCox
  • RWescott DHoadley

%Galloway

%Pierson DATE 10/13/99 10/13/99 10/14/99 10/14/99 10/14/99 10/14/99 9910200321 99FO((

" = COVER & ENCLOSURE N = NO COPY PDR ADOCK 07003098

FICIAL RECORD COPY C

PDR 4

~

MEMORANDUM TO:

John N. Hannon, Chi f Plant Systems Branch

/E y

jg Division of Systems Safety tt and Anaiysis, NRR

'FROMi Robert C. Pierson, Chief Special Projects Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety 1

i

- and Safeguards, NMSS

SUBJECT:

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT OF,-TNE PLANT SYSTEMS STANDARD REVIEW PLAN CHAPTE FOR THE MIXED-OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY The Special Projects Branch requests technical assistance for the following oject:

Project: Technical assistance in development of the plant systems cha er of a standard review plan (SRP) for the mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility. The pl t systems chapter is comprised of sections for each plant system such as cooling water entilation, electrical, etc.

O Casework /RITS/ TAC Nos: 70 309803)3S 211A0 L20356 MOX Standard Review Plan Requested Action: The Enrichment Section of the Special rojects Branch is responsible for developing an SRP for the MOX Facility. In the plant sys ms chapter, Mr. Charlie Cox has primary responsibility for developing the cooling water ction and Mr. Rex Wescott has the primary responsibility of developing the ventilation se ion. Where appropriate, my staff will be developing these sections to refer to current Nucle Regulatory Commission requirements and guidance, if current published guidance is not av able, the SRP section(s) will include a discussion providing that guidance.

I am requesting assistance from your staff on he MOX SRP plant systems chapter to provide peer review comments on the first draft of t cooling water and ventilation sections to ensure that the latest staff requirements and guid ce are considered and included where appropriate.

Your assistance. is greatly appreciated. The draft cooling water and ventilation sections are enclosed for your review. Your comments on these sections are requested by November 12, 1999.

Contact:

Lead, Fred Burrows, (301) 415-8110 Cooling Water Section, Charlie Cox, (301) 415-6755 Ventilation Section, Rex Wescott, (301) 415-6727 Docket: 70-3098

)

Er; closures: 1. MOX SRP section on cooling water

2. MOX SRP section on ventilation Distribution-

' Docket:. 70-3098 NRC File Centor PUBLIC NMSS r/f FCSS r/f SPB r/f ABryce G:\\SPB\\FHB\\MOX. memo.wpd

(*See previous concurrence)

OFC SPB E

SPB' E

SPB E

SPB/)

h SPB 1

SPB h

by N' ag NAME

  • FBurrows:al -

'CCox

'RWascott ey m

' s a

v r 7 ' 99 DATE-10/13/99 10/13/99 10/14/99 10//T /99 '

10//(f /99 10/ /v/

C = COVER.

E s COVER & ENCLOS0RE N = NO COPY OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

MEMORANDUM TO:

John N. Hannon, Chl:f Plant Systems Branch f.g r Division of Systems Safety

[0 g%(#

M and Analysis, NRR ct v

FROM:

Robert C. Pierson, Chief f[

Special Projects Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS

=

SUBJECT:

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST: DEV LOPMENT OF THE PLANT SYSTEMS STANDARD REVIEW N CHAPTER FOR THE MIXED-OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION F ILITY The Special Projects Branch requests technical assistance r the following project:

Prolect: Technical assistance in development of the nt systems chapter of a standard review plan (SRP) for the mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel fabricat' facility..The plant systems chapter is comprised of sections for each plant system suc as cooling water, ventilation, electrical, etc.

RITS/ TAC Nos: 211A0 L203565 030S OX Standard Review Plan Reauested Action:.The Enrichment Se ion of the Special Projects Branch is responsible for developing an SRP for the MOX Fac'

. In the plant systems chapter, Mr. Charlie Cox has primary responsibility for developin the cooling water section and Mr. Rex Wescott has the primary responsibility of developi g the ventilation section. Where appropriate, my staff will be developing these sections to r er to current Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements and guidance. If current publish guidance is not available, the SRP section(s) will include a discussion providing that idance.

I am requesting assist ce from your staff on the MOX SRP plant systems chapter to provide peer review commen on the first draft of the cooling water and ventilation sections to ensure that the latest staff uirements and guidance are considered and included where appropriate.

Your assistanc is greatly appreciated. A response by November 12,1999, is requested.

Contact:

Leqd, fred Burrows, (301) 415-8110 Cooling Water Section, Charlie Cox, (301) 415-6755 Ventilation Section, Rex Wescott, (301) 415-6727 Docket: 70-3098 Distribution:

Docket: 70-3098 NRC File Center PUBLIC NMSS r/f FCSS r/f I

SPB r/f -

AiscYg-G:\\SPB\\FHB\\MOX. memo.wpd OFC' SPB O-SPB SPB C

SPB SPB SPB NAME F

al CCo RW' ok DHoadley MGalloway RPierson e

DATE 10/13 /99 10/ /I /99 10//V /99 10/

/99 10/

/99 10/

/99 C = COVER E = COVER & ENCLOSURE N = NO COPY OFFICIAL RECORD COPY I

l

ato y

4 UNITED STATES j

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-4001 October 14, 1999 MEMORANDUM TO:

John N. Hannon, Chief Plant Systems Branch Division of Systems Safety and Analysis, NRR FROM:

Robert C. Pierson, Chief N Special Projects Branch i

Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS

SUBJECT:

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANT SYSTEMS STANDARD REVIEW PLAN CHAPTER FOR THE MIXED-OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY i

The Special Projects Branch requests technical assistance for the following project:

Noiect: Technical assistance in development of the plant systems chapter of a standard review

{

plan (SRP) for the mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility. The plant systems chaoter is j

comprised of sections for each plant system such as cooling water, ventilation, electrical, etc.

j Casework /RITS/ TAC Nos: 70-3098030S 211A0 L20356 MOX Standard Review Plan Recuested Action: The Enrichment Section of the Special Projects Branch is responsible for developing an SRP for the MOX Facility. In the plant systems chapter, Mr. Charlie Cox has primary responsibility for developing the cooling water section and Mr. Rex Wescott has the primary responsibility of developing the ventilation section. Where appropriate, my staff will be developing these sections to refer to current Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements and guidance. If current published guidance is not available, the SRP section(s) will include a discussion providing that guidance.

I am requesting assistance from your staff on the MOX SRP plant systems chapter to provide peer review comments on the first draft of the cooling water and ventilation sections to ensure that the latest staff requirements and guidance are considered and included where appropriate.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated. The draft cooling water and ventilation sections are enclosed for your review. Your comments on these sections are requested by November 12, 1999.

Contact:

Lead, Fred Burrows, (301) 415-8110 Cooling Water Section, Charlie Cox, (301) 415-6755 Ventilation Section, Rex Wescott, (301) 415-6727 i

Docket: 70-3098 I

Enclosures:

1. MOX SRP section on cooling water
2. MOX SRP section on ventilation I

1

1 12.4.3 Cooling Water 12.4.3.1 Regulatory Requirements The staff's requirements applicable to the cooling water system are the following:

J 10 CFR Part 70.23, specifically relating to the requirement that the proposed equipment and facilities are adequate'to protect health and minimize danger to life or property.

10 CFR Part 70.61(e), specifically relating to the requirement that each engineered or administrative control or control system that is needed to meet the performance requirements be designated as an item relied on for safety.

10 CFR Part 70.62, specifically relating to the establishment and maintenance of a safety program and to the conductance of as ISA.

10 CFR Part 70.64, specifically relating to the application of BDCs and defense-in-depth practices to new facilities or new processes at existing facilities.

12.4.3.2 Regulatory Guidance.

None, at present, specific to 10 CFR 70 licensees

'12.4.3.3 Regulatory Acceptance Criteria The reviewer will determine that the applicant's cooling water system is acceptable if it satisfies the relevant requirements listed in Section 12.4.3.1 and follows these guidelines:

a.

The system description and theory demonstrates how the cooling water system and its subsystems transfer heat loads from safety-related structures, systems, and components to an appropriate heat sink under both normal operating and accident conditions.

b.

The description demonstrates an adequate water supply under normal and hazardous conditions c.

The description demonstrates adequate component redundancy and the capability to isolate components, systems or piping for maintaining system safety function under varying system configuration, and the capability of integrated system control.

d.

Management measures including tests and other verification methods that demonstrate the structural integrity and system leak tightness, the operability and adequate performance of active system components, and the capability of the system to perform required functions during normal, and accident situations.

e.

Descriptions of the system showing the capability for withstanding environmental hazards resulting from pipe line breaks and dynamic effects associated with flow instability and attendant loads such as water hammer, or cavitation, and measures to prevent such dynamic conditions from occurring.

l

l f.

Design features which include capacity and capability for detecting leakage of

' radioactivity, chemical contamination from one system to another, and allowing inservice component inspection, system maintenance, and operational functional testing of the system and its components.

I, 1

1 l

7 4

e

,12.4.2, Ventilation Systems 12.4.1.1 Regulatory Requirements The staff's requirements applicable to the ventilation system are the following:

10 CFR Part 70.22, specifically relating to the requirement that the applicant is to provide a description of the equipment and facilities and propose procedures to protect health and minimize danger to life and property.

10 CFR Part 70.23, specifically relating to the requirement that the Commission determine that the proposed equipment, facilities, and procedures are adequate to protect health and minimize danger to lifa and property.

10 CFR Part 70.61(e), specifically relating to the requirement that each engineered or administrative control or control system that is needed to meet the performance requirements be designated as an item relied on for safety, 10 CFR Part 70.62,'specifically relating to the establishment and maintenance of a safety 1

program and to the performance of an ISA.

J 10 CFR Part 70.64, specifically relating to the application of BDCs and defense-in-depth practices to new facilities or new processes at existing facilities.

12.4.1.2 Regulatory Guidance The NRC regulatory guides and industry standards applicable to the ventilation system that in general provide guidance for implementing and satisfying the regulatory requirements and acceptance criteria are: NRC guidance documents such as NUREG -0800 " Standard Review Plan" and Regulatory Guide 3.12 " General Design Guide For Ventilation Systems of Plutonium Processing and Fuel Fabrication Plants"; DOE Standard 3020, " Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors"; and and industry codes and standards issued by the American National Standards Institute, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Air Movement and control Association, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, and Sheet Metal, and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association, National Fire Protection Association, and Underwriters Laboratories.

12.4.1.3 Regulatory Acceptance Criteria The applicant's ventilation system design and operation are acceptable if they satisfy the relevant requirements listed in Section 12.4.1.1 and follow the relevant guidelines mentioned under Section 12.4.1.2. Relevant requirements and guidelines for ventilation systems are those related to the applicable BDCs (quality standards and records; environmental and dynamic effects; utility service; inspection, testing and maintenance; and instrumentation and control) and defense-in-depth. Typically, these specific design considerations include:

1.

Confinement of radioactive contamination by zones and pressure differentials 2.

Test, calibration, and in-service surveillance capabilities I

.....i

i i

3.

Redundancy of fans, dampers, and power supplies

  • 4.

No single failure vulnerability S.

Sufficient capacity and capability 6.

Interlocks on supply fans to prevent zone pressurization 7.

Status monitoring and alarms 4

8.

Proper equipment qualification, quality assurance, and reliability.

9.

Adequate design for natural phenomena

- 10.

Appropriate fire protection and smoke control 11.

Continuous monitoring of recirculated air to occupied areas and diversion of contaminated air to a once-through exhaust system if allowable radiation standards are exceeded.

I 12.

Removal and replacement of filters is designed to permit only minimum exposure of personnel to radioactivity.

Additionally, the ventilation system design and operation should fulfill the functional requirements determined from the ISA and the system shot, d be available and reliable to perform its intended safety function when needed.

4 I