ML20217E209
| ML20217E209 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/24/1998 |
| From: | Wiggins E NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Lofy R PARAMETER, INC. |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-J-2407-8, CON-NRC-03-93-026, CON-NRC-3-93-26 NUDOCS 9803300409 | |
| Download: ML20217E209 (6) | |
Text
.
f**%
o t
UNITED STATES j
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20566-0001
,y...../
Ma'rch 13. 1998 Parameter. Inc.
Attn: Richard A. Lofy 13380 Watertown Plank road Elm Grove. WI 53122
SUBJECT:
MODIFICATION NO. 2 TO TASK ORDER NO. 130 UNDER CONTRACT NO. NRC-03-93-026
Dear Mr. Lofy:
In accordance with Section G.4, Iask Order Procedures, of the subject contract, this letter definitizes the subject task order modification. The effort shall be performed in accordance with the enclosed Statement of Work and the Contractor's technical proposal dated February 2. 1998.
This modification also extends the period of performance of the task order from April 5.1998 to May 15, 1998 and adds Donald Prevatte and Robert Quirk as " Key Personnel".
The cost ceiling for the subject task order, as a result of the subject modification.1s hereby increased by $30.262.49 from $68.972.62 to $99.235.11.
The amount of $29.429.00 represents the estimated reimbursable costs, the amount of $39.00 represents the facilities capital cost of money. and the amount of
$794.49 ' represents the fixed fee.
Accounting data for Task Order No.130. Modification No. 2 is as follows:
B&R No.-
820-15-11-20-2B
)
Job Code:
J-2407-8 i
BOC:
252A FFS No.-
NRR93026130(Incr)
APPN No..
31X0200.820
{
Oblig. Amt.
$30.262.49 The issuance of this task order does not amend any terms or ronditions of the subject contract.
\\
\\
l co%
)
.d W
4 j.,
- {
9803300409 900324
% o$U h-026 PDR i
Acceptance of Task Order No.130 Modification No. 2 should tie made by having an official.. authorized to bind your organization, execute three copies of this document in the space provided and return two copies to the Contract. Specialist at the address below.
You should retain the third copy for your records.
Sincerely.
.' W
~
hw
~
Elois J. Wiggins, m tracting Officer Contract Management Br. 2 Division of Contracts and
(
Property Management Office of Administration
Enclosure:
Statement of Work ACCEPTED:
Task Order No.130. Modification'No. 2 kcce T [,);, &p is,c c, ya cetSQ
\\
u
..,, =.
NAME V // "
l l% d, - ] ga_ hSU fax -<
2/a/97
\\ cS,
TITLE
}?S DATE l
l
]
STATEMENT OF WORK TASK ORDER 130 REVISION 2 TITLE:
Millstone Unit 2 and 3 ICAVP Oversight Team Technical Support DOCKET NUMBERS: 50-336 and 50-47.3
^
l B&R NUMBER: 820-15-11-20-2B JOB CODE: J2407 INSPECTION REPORT NUMBER: Task 1, 50-336/98-202; Task 2,50-423/98-206 NRC PROJECT OFFICER: Armando S. Masciantonio. NRR (301) 415-1290 NRC TEAM LEADERS: Ralph Architzel, NRR (301) 415-2804 (Task 1)
Tony Cerne, Region 1 (880) 701-3469 (Task 2)
TECHNICAL MONITOR: John A. Nakoski, NRR (301) 415-1278 PERFORMANCE PERIOD: 9/01/1997 to 4/5H998 5/15/1998
)
BACKGROUNQ On August 14,1996, a confirmatory order was issued requiring completion of an Independent
]
Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) before restart of any Mi!! stone unit. The order directs
{
the licensee to obtain the sen es of an organization, independent of the licenst e and its design i
contractors, to conduct a mi-tsciplinary review of Miilstone Units 1,2, and 3. The review is to provide independent verificatu i that the licensee's Configuration Management Plan has identified and r:: solved existing problems, documented and used licensing and design bases, and established programs, processes and procedures for effective configuration management in the future.
The Director of NRR has established a team, headed by an SES-level manager, that is responsible for overseeing the performance of the ICAVP. The objective of the ICAVP Oversight Team is to assure that the review conducted by the ICAVP contractor is independent of the licensee and its design contractors, performed by qualified individuals, and is comprehensive, incorporating appropriate cngineering discipline and operational reviews. The results of the ICAVP system reviews should provide the NRC with the insights necessary to determine whether NNECO has been thorough in the identification and resolution of design-related problems for the Millstone units.
The NRC's ICAVP oversight staff will perform a number of tasks to ensure that the licensee's configuration management corrective action programs, and the ICAVP, have been effectively implemented. These tasks include the (1) review and approval of the contractor, and individual contractor specialists, selected by the licensee to perform the ICAVP; (2) review and approval of the
' contractor's audit plan for performing the ICAVP; (3) independently assessing the licensee's implementation of its configuration management corrective action programs; (4) assessing the perfomnance of the ICAVP contractor's implementation of the ICAVP; (5) monitoring the contractor
' interactions with the licensee as specified in the approved communication protocol to ensure continued independence from the licensee; and (6) evaluating the adequacy of the licensee's corrective actions, cnd their implementation, including corrective actions developed in response to the ICAVP contractor's findings and recommendations, and the findings from the NRC's ICAVP oversight. Each of these tasks will require engineering support to varying degrees. New Task Orders will be prepared to support performance of each of the remaining tasks above individually or in groups in the future.
1 1
QBE_GTIV_E
' The objective of this Task Order is to obtain expert technical assistance from one piping design engineer in the performance of inspections to prov.ide oversight of the ICAVP contractor (Parsons Power) at Millstone Unit 2; and obtain expert technical assistance from one mecnanical design er'gineer and one Instrumentation and control (l&C) design engineer in the performance c f inspections the corrective actions performed by the licensee at Millstone Units 2 and 3. The engineer 9 should primarily have a design background, such as from an architect-engineer firm, but shouki also be f miliar with installation and testing and site engineering organization. The engineer should be thoroughly familiar with NRC regulations and inspection methodology.
It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assign technical staff, employees, and subcontractors, who have the required educational background, experience, or combination thereof, to meet both the t:chnical and regulatory objectives of the work specified in this SOW. The NRC will rely on representation made by the contractor conceming the qualification of the personnel proposed for assignment to this task order including assurance that all information contained in the technical and cost proposals, including resumes and conflict of interest disclosures, is accurate and truthful.
WORK REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE The work specified in this Statement of Work (SOW) falls within Section C.3 of the basic contract's SOW. The contractor shall provide the qualified specialist, and the necessary facilities, materials, and s;rvices to assist the NRC staff in preparing for, conducting, ar.d documenting the inspection activities end findings. Specific tasks under this task order are:
Ia3 EchesMe_ Comp!rdian
- 1. Perforrn a vertical slice system review (Tier 1
- 1. Performance of the Tier 1 out-of-scope out-of-scope) of a Unit 2 system. This effort vertical slice system review will be conducted includes three weeks of preparation, four starting on or about September 29,1997, weeks of onsite inspection, one week of in-ending on October 3,1997, resuming on or j
office review, and one week of documentation about sianuari 12 February 16,1998, and for the piping design engineer.
ending on or about Mefehe April 10,1998 -
9 weeks.
- 2. Perform inspection of corrective actions
- 2. Parformance of the inspection of corrective implemented by the licensee at Millstone Units actions will be conducted starting.on or about 2 and 3. This effort willinclude a maximum of February 2,1998, and ending on or about two weeks of onsite inspection and March 20,1998, During this. period, a documentation for both the mechanical design maximum of two weeks of effort for the engineer and the I&C design engineer.
mechanical design and I&C design engineers.. Specific periods of inspection support will be as agreed to by the NRC technical monitor or team leader - 2 weeks.
NOTE: Prior to the start of each Task 4, the contractor's staff is required to be available to coordinate inspection aspects, such as travel logistics, with the Team Leader.
During the performatice of the specific task under this task order, the technical monitor (team leader) may issue technical instructions fmm time to time. Techaical instructions must be within the general 2
6 I
?
- statement of work stated in this task order and shad not constitute new assignments of work or R
changes of such nature as to justify an adjustment in cost or period of performance. The contractor shall reler to section G.1 of the basic contract for further information and guidance on any technical
. directions issued under this task order. Any modifications to the scope of work, cost or period of performance of this task order must be issued by the Contracting Officer and will be coordinated with
. the NRR Project Officer.
REPORT REQUIREMENIS.
Technical Reoort
. During TasksL1 and 2 the contractor's specialists shall provide daily reports to the respective NRC
. Team Leader.. At the completion of Task 1 and Task 2, the contractor shall provide a summary report j
of activities performed under teelt4 the respective task to the NRC Team Leader. The format and scope of these reports shall be as directed by the respective NRC Team Leader.
Business Letter Report The contractor shall provide monthly progress reports in accordance with the requirements of the basic contract.
MEETINGS AND TRAVEL
- TASK 1 1
One, one person,5 day trip to NRC Headquarters to prepare for the Tier 1 out-of scope system vertical slice review on Unit 2 between September 29 and October 3,1997. This trip is required as the result of rescheduling of the inspection based on the licensee's inability to support the original schedule.
One, one person,12 day trip to NRC Headquarters to prepare for the Tier 1 out-of-scope vertical slice system review on Unit 2 between February 16 and February 27,1998 J;.u;ri 12 erd Jr.wi 20, 4998 l
)
Orte, one person,12 day trip to the licensee's Millstone Unit 2 facility to perform the first on-site visit for the Tier 1 out of n. cope vertical slice system review on Unit 2 between March 2 and March 13,~1998 J;r.;;ri 20 eri T;M;;ri 0,1000.
I One, one person, 5 day trip to NRC Headquarters to conduct in-office review of information collected during the first on-site visit for the Tier 1 out-of-scope vertical slice system review on Unit 2 between 1
March 16 and March 20,1998. T1u;ri 0 K4 I;kaari 10,1000.
One, one person,12 day trip to the licensee's Millstone Unit 2 facility to perform the second on-site visit
?
' for the Tier 1 'out-of-scope vertical slice system review on Unit 2 between March 23 and April 3,1998 ~
T 1.; j17 74 fe k.; j 27,1000.
- One, one person, 5 day trip to NRC Headquarters to document the results of the Tier 1 out-of-scope vertical slice system review on Unit 2 between April 6 and April 10,1998 MereMMndMerette 4998 1
r
' TASK 2 Two, one person l12 day trips to the licensee's Millstone facility to perform inspections of corrective 3
( 4 actions implemented by the licensee at cither Millstone Units 2 or 3 cra ruthorized betw en February 2 and March 20,1998, with the specific dates as agreed to by the NRC's Technical Monitor. If necessary, the 12 day trips may be split into two 5 day trips as necessary to support inspection activities.
Additional trips for the specialist to the licensee's facilities, NRC Headquarters, or the ICAVP contractor's facilities may be approved at the discretion of the NRC Technical Monitor for travel necessary to support the activities described in task 1.
The contractor's staff shall coordinate all travel arrangements in advance with the NRC Team Leader.
ESTIMATED LEVEL OF EFFORT Number Discioline Total Hours 1
Piping Design Engineer 360 1
Mechanical Design Engineer 80 1
l&C Design Engineer 80
{
The estimated level of effort for the piping design engineer for task 1 consists of 120 hours0.00139 days <br />0.0333 hours <br />1.984127e-4 weeks <br />4.566e-5 months <br /> for the preparation for the inspections: 160 hours0.00185 days <br />0.0444 hours <br />2.645503e-4 weeks <br />6.088e-5 months <br /> for performance of the inspections; 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> for in-office review of information; and 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> for documentation of their inspection activities. The estimated level of effort for the Mechanical Design and l&C Design engineers for task 2 consists of 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> for performance of the inspections and documentation of the inspection results.
NRC FURNISHED MATERIAL Documents required to prepare for the inspection will be provided by the NRC Team Leaders.
OTHER APPLICABLE INFORMATION f
The work specified in this SOW is 100 percent fee recoverable. The inspection report number for this T=h Orda Task 1 is 50-336/98-202, the inspection report number for Task 2 is 50-423/98-206. The i
contractor shall provide fee recovery information in the monthly progress reports in accordance with
. the basic contract.
The contractor's specialist assigned to this task order will have to be badged for unescorted access privilege at the plant site. The contractor shall provide all documentation required for badging (as identified by the NRC Team Leader or Project Manager) at the plant site. Questions concerning badging and the plant site access shall be addressed to the NRC Project Manager or Technical Monitor.
4