ML20217D014

Forwards Operator Licensing Exam Rept 50-461/97-313OL Conducted on 980126-0205

ML20217D014
Person / Time
Site:	Clinton
Issue date:	03/20/1998
From:	Grobe J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Walter MacFarland ILLINOIS POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20217C980	List: IR 05000461/1997313 ML20217C976 ML20217D014
References
50-461-97-313OL, NUDOCS 9803270274
Download: ML20217D014 (4)

See also: IR 05000461/1997313

Text

-

4

p

,

March 20,1998

L

Mr. Walter G. MacFarland IV .

Chief Nuclear Officer -

L -

Clinton Power Station-

lilinois Power Company - '

l Mail Code V-275

P P. O.LBox 678'

Clinton,IL 61727..

'

, SUBJECT: ' OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 5 /97313(OL)

Dear Mr. MacFarland:

On February 5,1998, the NRC completed initial operator licensing examinations at your Clinton

Power Station (CPS). The license applicants' performance evaluations were finalized on

. March 4,1998.' The enclosed report presents the results of the examination.

Operating and written examinations were administered to nine license applicants. Two

applicants were administered Reactor Operator (RO) examinations and seven applicants were

administered Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) examinations. Two SRO applicants failed

iportions of their examination and were denied operator licenses. .Two SRO applicants passed

all sections of their examinations and were issued Senior Reactor Operator licenses to operate

your. CPS.' Five applicants passed all sections of their RO or SRO examinations but were not '

. Issued operator licenses as they have not completed all requirements necessary to be issued a

? license.' These applicants will be issued licenses when you certify, in writing, to the Nuclear .,

Regulatory Commission that all CPS training program requirements and 10.CFR 55 required i

/ reactivity manipulations'are completed.1 Your certification should also state that the applicants'  !

-= were enrolled. in the continuing operator training program and their performance in that program )

.

' is satisfactory..

L , g This examination was your first opportunity to prepare an operator license examination under

the NRC's initial license examination process. This process allowed your training department I

personnel to prepare and administer the written examination and prepare the operating

i examination. NRC examiners administered the operating examination. Four occurrences of

,

poor examination material control (examination security) were identified during the examination

preparation and administrationJ One occurrence resulted .in a non-cited violation for failure to -

ensure adequate examination security. The remaining three examples did not represent a -

potential to compromise the examination and therefore are not considered violations. ' The

. examination was technically correct and examined at the proper complexity and depth for the

' license applicants. On-site NRC validation of the examination indicated a weakness in

examination validation in the area of Job Performance Measures.- 1

I

!: l

l

+f l 1

i

I '9803270274 980324

l'-  !PDR ADOCK 05000346

\' V PDR

d

"

fSQ

a

.

• March 20, 1998

W. MacFarand IV 2

' Administration of the examination revealed two operator performance issues needing additional

attention by the CPS Training Department. License applicants failed to correctly use the motor

.

operated valve test preparation switches provided for Emergency Core Cooling System  !

containment isolation valves. Of greater significance, some applicants failed to correctly

- execute steps of the Clinton Power Station Emergency Operating Procedures, such as initiating

Suppression Pool Cooling when required and using alternate injection sources to maintain

!

reactor pressure vessel water level when preferred injection sources were available.

Compliance with these procedures is necessary to ensure the health and safety of the general

public. Your actions to ensure correct EOP implementation will be monitored as part of our MC  ;

. 0350 oversight panel activities.  ;

Operator performance for one operating crew was observed in the control room by the j

examiners. During the observed period operators were found to be monitoring their control

panels on a regular basis and executing their responsibilities in a business like manner.

!

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the

enclosures to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. l

1

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this examination.

Sincerely

4

Original Signed by John A. Grobe  ;

John A. Grobe, Director

Division of Reactor Safety .

!

Docket No. 50-461

Enclosures: 1. Inspection Report 50-461/97313(OL)

2. Simulator Fidelity Report

3. Written Examination & Answer Key (SRO)

See Attached Distribution:

DOCUMENT NAME

G:DRS\CLl97313.0L (SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE)

l To receive a copy of this document. Indicate in the box *C's Copy w/o attach /end 'E" a Co)y w/ attach /end "N" = No copy

OFFICE Rlll:DRS Rlli:DRS Rill:DRP Rill:DRS , O

NAME DMcNeil: llc /jp/sd * MLeach * TKozak * JGrobCW

DATE- 3/ /98 3/ /98 3/ /98 3/k/98 i

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

l

[,

y

l

.

,

!

..W. MacFarand IV -2

Administration of the examination revealed two operator performance issues needing additional

attention by the CPS Training Department.~ License applicants failed to correctly use the motor

. operated valve test preparation switches provided for Emergency Core Cooling System

containment isolation valves. Of greater significance, some applicants failed to correctly ~

'

execute steps of the Clinton Power Station Emergency Operating Procedures, such as initiating

Suppression Pool Cooling when required and using altamate injection sources to maintain

reactor pressure vessel water level when preferred injection sources were available.

.F

, Compliance with these procedures is necessary to ensure the health and safety of the general j

'public. Your actions to ensure correct EOP implementation will be monitored as~ part of our MC '

0350 oversight panel activities.

g Operator performance for one operating crew was observed in the control room by the

examiners. During the observed period operators were found to be monitoring their control'

panels on a regular basis and executing their responsibilities in a business like manner,

in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the

enclosures to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have conceming this examination.

Sincerely  !

l

!

l.

' John A. Grobe, Director i

Division of Reactor Safety  !

!

. Docket No. 50-461

5nclosures: 1. Inspection Report 50-461/97313(OL) ,

2. Simulator Fidelity Report  ;

3. Written Examination & Answer Key (SRO) i

I

'

See Attached Distribution:

i

DOCUMENT NAME: G:DRS\CLl97308.OL -

' To receive a co py of thee document, Indicate in the box *C" = Copy w/o attach /end T = Ccpy w/ attach /end "N" = No copy

OFFICE Rill:DRS v Rill:DRS v Rill:DRP E., Rill:DRS

NAME- DMcNeil:llefjpff MLeach #w4 TKozak C JGrobe ,

DATE: 3//798 3//7/98 3/l?98 3! /98

,

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

p  ;

p

'

. ,

p.

t

L - W. MacFarland IV 3- March 20,1998

cc w/encis 1 & 2: G. Hunger, Station Manager

R. Phares, Manager, Nuclear Safety

,

'

and Performance improvement

J. Sipek,' Director- Licensing

, - Nathan Schloss, Economist

Office of the Attomey General

G. Stramback, Regulatory Licensing

Services Project Manager

General Electric Company

'

Chairman, DeWitt County Board

State Liaison Officer-

Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission

- cc w/encls 1,2 & 3: J. F. Paichak, Plant Training Manager

,4

Distnbution-

Docket File w/encis DRP w/encls

SRI Clinton w/encls PUBLIC IE-42 w/encis

.

. Project Manager, NRR w/encls Rill PRR w/encls

Rlli Enf. Coordinator w/encls IEO w/encls (E-mail)

TSS w/encls A. B. Beach w/encls

- DOCDESK (E-mail) Deputy RA w/encls 1

DRS (2)w/encls ' GREENS

.- .

.)

i

,

!

l

l

,

I