ML20217B945

Forwards Partially Deleted Results of Investigation Re Allegation RII-94-A-0119

ML20217B945
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	02/09/1995
From:	Geiger J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20217B785	List: IA-97-484, Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Forwards Records in App H,Being Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 7) ML20217B780 ML20217B945
References
FOIA-97-484 L-95-49, NUDOCS 9804230161
Download: ML20217B945 (3)

Text

- - - - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Florida Power & Light Company P 0. Box 14000. Juno Beach, FL 33408-0G20 4

FPL FEB 31995 L-95-49 10 CFR 2.790 ,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission -

Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Re: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Allegation RII-94-A-0119 Gentlemen:

By letter dated December 27, 1994, (E. W. Merschoff to J. H.

Goldberg), the NRC requested Florida Power and Light Co. (FPL) review the concerns listed in Allegation RII-94-A-0119.

An investigation into the concerns of the allegation has been performed by our Nuclear Safety SPEAKOUT program. The results of the investigation are enclosed.

As indicated in your. letter, the enclosure is exempt from disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790 (a) (6) and (7).

V truly yours,

/

5 C

i J. E. G e

[ Vice President Nuclear Assurance JEG/RJA/ keg Enclosure cc: / Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant

~

9804230161 980417 PDR FOIA BARTON97-484 PDR it.!c::09c i:; *: 7;:,-1 ;, ,g  ;.

4 + C,.'d ' T 00 ', l.') U:J ;;.:s;;.,y c; lr,lg,m3,37,.

l4!, G:.; p:,",,!!.; _7$_

EUIS' LYd.f an FPL Group company

A Ii Attachment to L-95-49 '

Page 1 ENCLOSURE ALLEGATION: s ,

Reference:

RII-94-A-0119 - Physical Security Fitness for Duty Concerns On December 30, 1994, FPL received Allegation RII-94-A-0119. This llegation raised concerns regarding fitness for ues e allegation containe two issues,as follows:

ISSUES: '

qc.

1.

2.

RESPONSE

PL's Nuclear Safety SPEAKOUT organization conducted an

[/ investigation of these issues in January,of 1995. The results of the investigation are sunnarized below.p The investigation partially substantiated this allegation.

The investigation of issue #1 a ve revealed that 64 1'

The investigation of issue #2 was unable o subs e the allegat' as written, 1

IgroguwTnn ur='LFaew-vrscLoSURE UNusa lo crx 2.790 (a) (7).

1 a e *

'l

)

l Attachment to L-95-49 Page 2 RESPONSE - CONTINUED l l

l A review of F t e For Duty (FFD) records indicated that h en randomly tested for gs and 1cohol several times and have always tested negative.

has ever been tested or cause".

Although SPEAKOU was unable to substantiate portions of the llegation he abundance of w provided rumors orknowledci,}eofeventsrelate otea egation (but which could not be substantiated because of the absence of documented reports, i l or because of conflicting interviews, or personnel turnover) made .

it prudent to ptovide countermeasures to identify and pr nt and/or mitigate events of t e type described in the allegation In that regard, SPEAKOUT ha ssued two recommendations to p ant management.

'The complete report is vailable for review at our SPEAKOUT office ht the St. Lucie Plant i

I l

l l 1 l \

l l

l 1

l i

INF gRMATION MYRMDT PD N DISCLOS"* """3 -10 CFE 2.7 5 0 (d)'S}(7)-

3