ML20217A995
| ML20217A995 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 09/16/1997 |
| From: | Subalusky W COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9709230138 | |
| Download: ML20217A995 (67) | |
Text
_ _ - __ _
l i
u nnnonw r. inh niimn < on p.,n>
us m.<,,,,,nnu sun. n
. (41 Non b.'lsi Ib utt
\\latwillt s. Il 614 il O'%"
n o is3 c <,-(,i September 16,1997 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555
Subject:
LaSalle County Restart Meeting on August 28,1997 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License NPF-11 and NPF-18 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50 374
Reference:
W. T. Subalusky letter to USNRC, transmitting Revised LaSalle County Station Restart Plan, dated August 27,1997.
On August 28,1997, LaSalle County met with the NRC at the Region 111 offices in Lisle, Illinois, to discuss progress on the LaSalle Station Restart Plan. During this review, we discussed our detailed Action Plans described in the LaSalle Restart Plan.
As requested, copies of these detailed plans are enclosed.
At the August 28 meeting, several other issues were discussed that warrant additional information. We will provide this additional information in a subsequent letter.
Should you have any questions regarding this material, please contact me.
Respectfully, h_'A x W. T. Subalusky Site Vice President LaSalle County Station f
i Enclosure Q L.o cc:
A. B. Beach, NRC Region ill Administrator M. P. Huber, NRC Senior Resident inspector - LaSalle D. M. Skay, Project Manager - NRR - LaSalle F. Niziotek, Office of Nuclear Facility Safety -lDNS M. N. Leach, NRC Region 111 R. A. Capra, NRR ElP"i8an 3?8 as7a MENNM P
\\ t nu um ( uinium
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan
~
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan m
j D
'g: - M
~
f g &,+~
m % SMATEGYf f adr M Strategy No: 1 I
Title:
Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: S. Smith
==
Description:==
Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achiestd by:
-imprming operator performance,
- reducing operator challenges, and
- correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation
-improve operator training.
l
$r a w A.m_a l u ;
m ACTEONFIAN_;
._1 1 5
=
_m
=
z ;- _
&_z m _
m, m
Action Plan No: 1. l A
Title:
Improve Operator Performance - Monitor Critical Operation Function
==
Description:==
Follow-up verification has not been consistently implemented to ensure that correcth e and performance imprmement actions have been effecthely incorporated into daily work acthities.
Objective: Improve Operator and Supervisor professionalism and ability to sustain safe p! ant operation through specific oversight actions using criteria that is consistent with both performance expectations and training acthities.
Team Memben: 1. D. Farr 1j t
~~
" h sammemad
=
bm
- " Pwierman=s* h 1
^4 Comprehensive weighted SCORECARD error rate (composed of the Continuous Improvement l
l following):
Number oferrors per operator round (error rate)
Improving Trend Number ofmissing log entries Improving Trend Number oferrors per OOS (error rate)
Improsing Trend Number of procedure errors (includes surveillances)
Improsing Trend Number of errors per communication observed (error rate)
Improsing Trend Number of MCR Performance Weaknesses observed (error rate)
Improsing Trend Strategt I Acuon Plan 1 I A 9/16/97 Rettsion la Page I of 65
ImSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description n
=--
n
~ ~ ~ ~ m n.w= - =.
--n~=~-.,--
=. = - u.
~ ~ = ~. = ~
1.
Implement " scorecard" monitoring system patterned after Braidwood and WNP-2 2.
Monitor completed surveillances for accrracy and completeness. Document findings, dctermine causes for inaccurate or incomplete surveillance and initiate corrective action.
3.
Monitor operator rounds for accuracy and completeness, identification of trends and effectiveness of corrective actions. Document findings, determine causes for inaccurate or incomplete rounds and initiate corrective action.
4.
Monitor operator logs for completeness, legibility and conformance with expectations. Document findings, determine causes for inadequate or incomplete operator logs and initiate corrective action.
5.
Monitor out-of-service problems including type and number Trend results and implement corrective action.
6.
Monitor procedure use and compliance. Document findings related to items such as not following procedure, missed steps or hoM points and inadequate procedure and initiate corrective action.
7.
Monitow imunication for direct,3-way communication in the Main Control Room and the plant. Document findings hiermine causes for inaccurate or incomplete communication and initiate corrective action.
8.
Monitor NSO Alarm Response, prompt response, informed supervisor returns appropriate alarm response procedure.
l 9.
Monitor pre-shift briefmgs. Provide immediate feedback to person conducting briefing areas for improvement. Input to trend database for follow-up.
10.
Monitor pre-job briefs /HLA briefs. Input to trend database for fol!ow-up.
I 1.
Monitor US/NSO tumover for completeness, board walkdown. Identify deficiencies per" scorecard", de-briefwith individual. Input to trend database.
l 12.
Monitor NLO tt rnovers for completeness, accuracy, professionalism. Identify deficiencies per " scorecard", debrief with individual. Input to trend datr. base.
13.
Monitor MCR performance in accordance with " Scorecard". Trend observations, proside direct and immediate feedback.
14.
Monitor I cked Valve program in accordance with " Scorecard" Trend observations rovide direct and immediate feedback.
{
Strategy I Action Plan 1.1 A 9/16/97 Revision la Page 2 0f 65
m LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/Ucit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan 15.
Establish " baseline" data points for Action Steps #2 through 14 above. Initiate corrective actions.
16.
Evaluate performance data and trend for Operator performance issues identified in. Action Steps #2 through 14 above.
Evaluate corrective actions where needed and adjust as required.
17.
Evaluate Operations performance and readiness for unit restart. Provide recommendation to Plant Manager, and Site V.P.
I Strategy I Acnon P!n 1.lA 9/16/97 Revision la Page 3 cf 65
LcSalle County Nuclear Station Unit UUrit 2 Restart Pla:s Restart Action Plan g %, 3s g c;p[ jsh y
- /, i$gdM; RSTRATEGY&g M&;dnsg'A T Figf '
s
. *g i
Strategy No: 1 I
Title:
Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: S. Smith
==
Description:==
Establish a strong focus on operational safety and oecome an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:
-improving operator performance,
- reducing operator challenges, and
- correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation
-improve operator training.
U$$~
f ' < $$$iMPWTER^$E : %$mjjn dF } ACTION FLAN:nEEdntNudmmf madL 14 l
Action Plan No: 1. l B
Title:
Improve Operator Performance - Operator Work Environment
==
Description:==
The operator work environment requires physical improvements to support standards ofprofessionalism, ownership and effective l
plant operation Objective: Upgrade the operator work environment to achieve improved professionalism, operator ownership and effective communication and planning for operational activities.
Team Members: 1. J. IIouston
- 2. R. Argubright
- 3. T. Cannon 4.
D. Enright
- 5. J. Helland
- 6. R. IIichborn
- 7. R. Immke
- 8. L. Demick
- 9. M. Sebby
- 10. D. Sheldon
- 11. J. Washko
' ^' J "W N WPedenummeeStandasWW rej EtFedonnanceTMeassee Ae M-B us Improved Operation's performance and professionalism as measured by See AP 1.1 A.
l Action Plan 1.l A.
Strategv 1 Action Plan 1.lB 9/16/97 Revision la Page 4 of 65
~
LcSalle County Nuclear Station Ucit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Pla:2 Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description m mm.m_
.m m.- mm m
-=.
mm mm mm ammm =~
m m m.
mm.
1.
Establish completion dates for those steps not required for restart 2.
. Upgrade the Main Control Room appearance such that a professional emironment will be established and vstained 2.1 Revise admin procedures as required for action plan.
2.2 Establish a means to prevent recurrence, i.e. Quarterly walkdown by NSO, S.M. and CRSS 2.3 Benchmark trip to Dresden 2.4 Install new carpet: Detennine new carpet color scheme; Complete Purchase Order for new carpet 2.5 Paint Control Room walls: Determine new color scheme 2.6 Clean ceiling panels 2.7.1 Refurbish control panel protective rails 2.7.2 Install stainless steel rails 2.8 Determine new location / organize existing: SCDA cart, PING monitor, Emergency Food Locker, Food Preparation Area; Mechanical / Electrical Prints, Storage for chart paper and fuses, FAX machine, Xerox Machine, Micro-fiche l
reproduction machine 2.9 Organize storage equipment at center desk: LGA cabinets ( Units I and 2), Operability Evaluations storage 2.10 Establish controls for the sound powered equipment: Storage ofjumper wires, logbook for users, headsets and cables, remove engraving from wall.
2.11 Remove reactor and Fuel Pool display cabinets. Discuss with Nuclear Engineering, Alternate identification method for nuclear fuel storage 2.12 Install covers on vertical ca* ole runs Determine if trays can be covered with System Engineering 2.13 Aux Building Elevator: Clean Interior, New CarpetAVall Covering 3.
Upgrade the Shift Operations Supervisor and Shift Manager office areas to facilitate improved professionalism, shift communications and planning.
Strategv I Action Plan 1.1B 9/16/97 Revision la Page 5 of 65
LaSalle County NuclearStation
' Udt UUdt 2 Restart Plao Restart Action Plan 3.1 Replace ceiling tile 3.2 Carpet upgrade (SOS & SM Office, Ifallway)
- Identify carpet color scheme (Complete)
- Purcha e carpet (Complete) 3.3 Paint office areas and hallway 3.4 Establish document storage area 3.5 Upgrade wiring for cube.
3.6 Establish personnel item storage area - Personnel filing cabinets 3.7 Fabricate cover for communication center equipment 3.8 Modify kitchen area
- Build wall between oflice and kitchen,
- Re-establish kitchen.
3.9 SOS Oflice area 3.9.1 Desks to accommodate Unit I and Unit 2 SOS 3.9.2 Large table to allow for personnel briefings 3.9.3 Relocate EWCS and Caution Card printers 3.9.4 Desk to accommodate R-Week Shift Manager 3.9.5 Individual phones and computers 3.10 Storage and Organizational equipment
- Procedures (LOP, LAP, LLP, LST, etc.)
3.10.1 Supervisor Personnel Files 4.
Upgrade the Operator Briefing Room to establish a professional environment for pre-shift briefings and training.
4.1 Relocate items not associated with shift briefing 4.2 Replace ceiling Strategv 1 Action Plan I.lB 9/16/97 Rension la Page 6 of 65
....-_..n1-1
-w cin.a6
LcSalle CouIty Nuclear Station U it 1/U;it 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan 4.3 Install new carpet 4.4 Complete Purchase Order for new carpet 4.5.1 Paint room 4.5.2 Install chair rail along walls.
4.6 Upgrade Audio and Visual Equipment - Install TV with VCR. - Comed TV - Install pull down projection screen -
i Movable cart with computer and projection system 4.7 Upgrade briefing room lighting - Can lights with dimmer control 4.8 Purchase new briefing table 4.9 Organize wall hangings - Purchase new white boards 5.
Upgrade the Operator Ready Room to establish a professional emironment for operators to perform work outside of the power block and to perform pre-job planning for tasks in the power block 5.1 Identify barriers to relocation l
I 5.2 Determine ifbarriers can be removed 5.3 Tearn decision to relocate or expand. Interview / solicit operator responses for relocation Review operator needs with WCC Process Improvement Team. Determine what is best for the Station 5.4 Determine what makes a GOOD Operator Ready Room Benchmark Dresden/ Benchmark Braidwood 5.5 Determine what the new standards are for the ready room 5.6 Modify action plan to support fmdings in Steps 5.2,5.3, and 5.4 5.7 Determine operator ready room location - Senice building or Aux Building 5.8 Relocate RP Supervisors 5.9 Paint room Strategy I Action Plan 1.lB 9/16/97 Redsion Ia Page 7 of 65
LaSalle County Nuc3 car Station Usit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan 5.10 Ready room furniture and equipment
- Install desks
- Install computer equipment with printer
- TV with VCR
- Storage of personnel bags in ready room 5.11 Food preparation area Purchase f.itchen equipment (stove, microwave and refrigerator) Purchase kitchen cabinets Install sink with garbage disposal 5.12 Determine use for locker room by Shift Manager's office
- Identify current inhabitants oflockers
- Renovate shower area
- Reduce size of shower area
- Purchase more lockers
- Repair and/or replace ceiling tiles 6.
Create a professional ready room for the NSO's outside the main control room. The room will be located close the main control room. This is a commitment made during negotiations for the 1997 schedule 6.1 Identify qualities of a GOOD NSO ready room What will the room be used for? What activities will be performed in 1
the room? What equipment will be required? Poll SOS to determine what their needs will be forjob preparation.
6.2 After 6.1 is complete, MODIFY action plan as appropriate 6.3 Determine final location for NSO ready room 6.4 Paint room 6.5 Carpet room 6.6 Determine furniture needs 6.7 Install communication equipment - Phones - Computer 6.8 Move into room Strategv 1 Action Plan 1.lB 9/16/97 Revision Ia Page 8 of 65
LcS:lle County Nuclear Station Ucit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Piza Restart Action Plan E iggj y l's c ":
( af7@s * ;g,SntA_TEGYj%)Q jy% (3 3jn :
~# >
m 1
l Strategy No: 1
Title:
Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: S. Smith
==
Description:==
Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:
-improving operator performance,
- reducing operator challenges, and
- correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation
-improve operator training.
di
~ 9%sf ML < ispe@yi dN#? CHONFLANihd5 '- m * '_ a, ae m %dS;n]
^
Action Plan No: 1. lC
Title:
Improve Operator Performance - Restart and Power Ascension Plan
==
Description:==
The normal unit startup and power ascension process must be supplemented to provide effective management oversight, and ensure conservatism in the startup process.
Objective: Develop a Restart and Power Ascension Pla. and implement the Plan during unit restart in two phases prior to unit restart and during the startup and power ascension to full power.
Team Members: 1. A. Magnafici
- 2. D. Enright
- 3. R. Dus 4.
D. Sheldon
- 5. K. Dorwick 6
J. Henry
- 7. B. Sly
- 8. G. Ford
- 9. A. Javorik
- 10. K.. Francis
$l
- L EPerf6nasaceMsasurf $,Mt :M8
~
de M
( PerforunameeStandani d
Infrequently performed activities are conducted in a controIIed and Minimal Human Performance Errors during infrequently performed precise manner.
activities.
Operations Event Free Clock 12 mo. and 3 mo. Rolling Average.
Improving Trend.
Strategv I Action Plan 1.lC 9/16/97 Revision la Page 9 of 65
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plas Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description u-x a-=,.;
n_..
=.n.,==a.w
+- ~ =
.n - _ = =. -
-n
- =.x
=a
..=-
1.
Senior Management Oversight 1.1.
Establish Roles and Responsibilities of SMOS oversight function 1.2.
Identify candidates for SMOS function 1.3.
Establish rotational schedule for SMOS function 1.4.
Complete training of SMOS candidates US.
Begin staffing SMOS function 2.
Plant Equipment Lineup Verification 2.I Determine key systems to validate OOS positions.
2.2 Using Orion Checklists, walkdown all systems to validate equipment positions.
3.
Complete Pre-start up Reviews 3.1.
Complete LAP-1200-15, as required to support mode switch to startup 3.2.
Complete Start up OSR 3.3.
Complete Start up PORC 4.
Fast Cruise System Checkout 4.1.
Identify Acceptance Tests and Special Tests performed as part of the Restart Plan that along with on going Surveillance i Testing, including integrated LOP and other cycle surveillance testing will demonstrate the plant material condition, personnel performance, organizational response and work control process are fully ready for a safe and reliable startup and Power Ascension program.
Schedule Acceptance and Special Testing and Prepare and Approve the Power Ascendon Plan.
I 4.2.
4.3.
Identify all procedures required for Restart and Power Ascension and when they will be needed.
I 4.4.
Complete ALL procedures required for Restart and Power Ascension.
I Strategy I Action Ptan 1.1C 9/16/97 Revision la Page 10 of 65
1ll ll l
~
C5 I
6 y
l.
f ge1 o I
ta nI r a1 t
l S P e g n a oP itcA
.no d.
w Are no wo it n P
a a r
t l
o SP nf rt adl r
e ae aP r
i c s n u l
t q
ue o e NRi r
t a
c g l
n y2 Ai n
t t t s
o ni t i
r e s
un t
i a
v oUt ll e
C/s R
a 1
e d et R n a l i la n t
SU o
r a
pe L
R sse rgo rP na lP tra tseR e
te lp moC 79
/
6 5
1
/
4 9
I
~
' LcSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/Utit 2 Restart Pla Restart Action Plan Madj hW $, g 'n ( 7 J ': s, y
% Jsw % :STRATEG E#N Q % g y w'Cgu ' ;:
2 l
Strategy No: I j
Title:
Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: S. Smith
==
Description:==
Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven orgamzation so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:
-improving operator performance,
- reducing operator challenges, and
- correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation
-improve operator training.
_our 3 O ' 5f!amb /M1LEsn ^ sar.m A m / < *? f CITOMFLAN MdAL mi~ ~
y
&x:m Action Plan No: 1.2A
Title:
Reduce Operator Challenges - Operator Work-arounds l
==
Description:==
Plant operators are unnecessarily challenged during normal, abnormal and emergency plant conditions due to a high number of operator work-arounds.
Objective: Reduce challenges to plant operators by reducing the number of operator work-arounds that require compensatory action by operators in the normal course of their daily actisities.
Team Members: 1. G. Ford
- 2. R. McConnaugha
- 3. A. Trainor 4.
A. Daniels 5.
R. Karger
- 6. J. Shetterly s"
-m dp FerferummeteStandard b
- s PerforassaceMessent ' ' '8 C x
NO safety significant Operator Work-Arounds at Unit I startup All safety significant work-arounds on Unit I completed.
NO safety significant Operator Work-Arounds at Unit 2 startup All safety significant work-arounds on Unit 2 completed.
Strategy I Action Plan 1.2A 9/16/97 Revision la Page 12 of 65
~
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Ur.it 1/Urit 2 Restart Pl~2 Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description n
-nna;an -=-~~=-n=
-;nwn.w- ~ ~ u-=
=
- - - - ~
~ _ -
1.
Identify and have in place a replacement for J. Geer with completed turnover.
2.
Complete Work, Post Maintenance Testing and Closeout operator Work-arounds in LIF35 during s: art up testing:
WAS CM System, Replace post LOCA H2/02 panels.
WA145 Source Range Monitoring System, Replace signal cables from preamps to detectors WA151 OG System, Modify refrigeration start /stop logic.
WA164 FC System, Repair IFC034.
WA178 RWCU is unstable during startup in the temperature range of 190-325 F.
WA191 IID System. Heater drain valves are undersized.
WA196 EII System, Provide fmer control for TG shell warming.
WA201 OG System, Repair iN62-F043.
WA209 GS System, Unplug exhauster drain line.
WA220 GC System, PCV locked in fixed position.
Strategy I Action Plan 1.2A 9/16/97 Revision la Page 13 of 65
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/Utit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan 3.
Complete Work, Post Maintenance Testing and Closeout Operator Work-arounds in LIF35 (do not require Unit I startup testing),
WA8 RR System, Repair RR HPU isolation valves.
WA9 RR System, Replace actuators in F060A and F608.
WA10 PR System, Correct B RHR PRM low sample flow.
WA19 CD System, Modify min flow valves.
WA43 DG System, Replace O DG, I A DG and IB DG VAR meters.
WA49 CW System, CW pump gland cooling water modification.
WA84 VG System, VG WRGM pump draws moisture into system.
WA107 RM System Upgrade RMCS transponder cards.
WAl12 CW System, Overhaul traveling screens.
WA131 SC System, SBLC storage tank bubbler becomes clogged.
j WA133 VC System, Refurbish VC/VE A and B Train humidification.
i WA153 RH System, Modify RHR heat exchanger outlet valves.
WA194 VP System, Modify 1VP070A and 1VP070B.
WA197 ZZ System, Relocate Met. tower.
WA198 IS System Replace Security UPS/ Static switch.
WA200 VR System, Repair 1 MSIV room door (Door 408).
WA203 RT System, Repair IG33-F034A, IG33-F038A.
WA208 AN/FP Sys, Troubleshoot fire / evac sirens in MCR.
WA210 AP System, Install locks on switches 1EW0lDA and 1EWOIDB in the Remote Lighting Cabinet or on the Cabinet.
WA211 RM System, Remova RSCS system.
WA212 CM System, Replace PL151/75J panels.##
WA213 SA/IA Sys, Resolve automatic drain trap reliability issue.
WA214 CW System, Repair 1CW018A.
WA219 DG System, Add cooling water flow gages for VY area coolers.
WA221 CW System, Reset and calibrate slip guard relay.
WA223 VR System, Modify VR pressure controller WA226 HP System, Unclog HPCS waterleg pump min flow line.
WA227 WL System, Repair / replace Howell-Bunger valve.
WA229 DG System, Resolve DG fuel day tank level indication issue.
Strategy I Action Plan 1.2A 9/16/97 Revision la Page 14 of 65
~
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Ucit 1/Ucit 2 Restart Plao Restart Action Plan 4.
WA224 SA/IA Sys, Complete system walkdowns for Units I and submit marked-up P& ids for DCRs 5.
Schedule work and Post Maintenance Testing and closcout Operator Work-Arounds to be completed in 1997 Non-outage.
WA225 CG System, Replace OCG025 and OCG027 6.
Complete Work, Post Maintenance Testing and Closcout Operator Work-arounds in L2R07 during Unit 2 stanup testing; WAS CM System, Replace post LOCA H2/02 panels.
WA21 OG System, Add service air to OG H2 analyzers.
WA105 MS System, Remove MSIV leakage control system.
WA145 Source Range Monitoring System, Replace signal cables from preamps to detectors.
WA177 FW System, Replace 2A Turbine Driven Reactor Feed pump high point vent valves (2FW43A / 2FW44A).
WA178 RWCU is u:istable during startup in the temperature range of 190-325 F.
i WA185 EH System, Replace IV and ISV shutoffvalves.
WA191 HD System, Heater drain valves are undersized.
WA196 EH System, Provide finer control for TG shell warming.
WA201 OG System, Repair 2N62-F043.
WA220 GC System, PCV locked in fixed position.
Strategy I Acuon Plan 1.2A 9/16/97 Revision la Page 15 of 65
~
LcSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan 7.
Complete Work, Post Maintenance Testing and Closeout Operator Work-arounds in L2R07 (do not require Unit 2 startup testing),
WA8 RR System, Repair RR HPU isolation valves.
WA9 RR System, Replace actuators in F060A and F60B.
WA19 CD System, Modify min flow valves. WA43 DG System, Replace 2A DG and 2B DG VAR meters.
~WA49 CW System. CW pump gland cooling water modification.
WA107 RM System, Upgrade RMCS transponder cards.
. WAi 12 CW System, Overhaul traveling screens.
WA131 SC System, SBLC storage tank bubbler becomes clogged.
WA153 RH System, Modify RHR heat exchanger outlet valves.
WAl82 RR System, Repair 2B FO23B and 2B FO67A.
WA188 PCIS Sys, Modify PCIS system.
WA195 OG System, OG PDT pumps become air-bound.
WA200 VR System, Repair 2 MSIV room door.
j WA203 RT System, Repair leaking RWCU valves.WA208 AN/FP Sys, Troubleshoot firelevac sirens in MCR.
i WA210 AP System, Install locks on switches 2EWOIDA and 2EWOIDB in the Remote Lighting Cabinet or on the Cabinet.
WA211 RM System, Remove RSCS system.
WA212 CM System, Replace PL15J/75J panels.##
WA213 SA/IA Sys, Resolve automatic drain trap reliabilityissue.
WA215 %T System, Machine and weld adapter plate for MOV.
WA218 CSCS Sys, RHR keepfill mod.
WA219 DG System, Add cooling water flow gages for VY area coolers.
WA223 VR System, Modify VR pressure controlier.
WA229 DG System, Resolve DG fuel day tank level indication issue 8.
WA224 SA/IA Sys, Complete system walkdowns in Unit 2 and submit marked-up P& ids for DCRs.
9.
Complete a Draft Action Plan for each operator work-around that was open on 12/31/96 that did not have one.
WA32 10.
Develop a schedule based on outage schedule for all Unit 2 Work-Arounds.
I 1.
Schedule or complete an action plan for each Operator Work-Around (OWA) that is listed on the LIF35 OWA list i
defining the resolution plan, schedule date and responsible individual / organization. Update on an ongoing basis.
Strategy I Action Plan 1.2A 9/16/97 Revision la Page 16 of 65
~
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Ur.it 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan 12.
Establish a resolution plan to eliminate OWAs with Safety Significance. Implement a monthly review ofopen OWAs to I establish a mutual agreement on open OWA resolution priorities and schedule. Identify any OWAs that will create an operator distraction at 100% power following unit restart. Unit Plant Manager or Operations Manager must approve any long-term OWAs, including OWAs greater than I cycle.
13.
Establish objective criteria for emergent and existing OWA inclusion.
I I
14.
Separate performance monitoring to units.
15.
Provide writtenjustification for the GWA that have been deferred to LIR08 or beyond, define the safety impact and the i impact on the operators in the plant. Unit Plant Manager and Operations Manager approval is required.
i l
16.
Plan of the Day - Weekly discussion on OWA impacts.
I l
l Strategy I Aaion Plan 1.2A 9/16/97 Revision la Page 17 of 65
~
LcSalle County Nuclear Station Urit UUrit 2 Restart Pl:a Restart Action Plan
^ 2% wh%m x % m..ymu
> www e
w - as:
-e nn MM em N.
a&..
+da %
mr ax Wa manm f x.; s aw,
%gMw?t;g 6
< ~
Strategy No: 1
Title:
Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: S. Smith
==
Description:==
Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven orgamzation so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:
-improving operator performance,
- reducing operator challenges, and
- correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation
-improve operator training.
b 5 ' %, ^ ges ei
@#F
- %JdMNMhliXCTIONPLANnfisk DhdhM(di: jff7Liyarh.d Action Plan No: 1.2B
Title:
Reduce Operator Challenges - Temporary Challenges
==
Description:==
Plant operators are unnecessarily challenged during normal, abnormal and emergency plant conditions due to a high number of temporary alterations to plant systems.
Objective: Reduce challenges to plant operators by reducing the number of temporary alterations to plant systems that unnecessarily challenge them during normal, abnormal and emergency plant conditions.
Team Members: 1. J. Schroeder
- 2. R. McConnaugha
- 3. H. Vinyard 4.
D. Watson
- 5. R. Karger
~ +* - ?"
' @i99 NPerformaameeStandard.
^t ae UP sdad$i 9889 Performasme* Measure ~
$4 s
lNo significant TALTs installed at Start Up As determined by collegial review with the Plant Manager with l
Engineering, the Operations Manager, Shift Operations Supersisor, and Shift Managers.
% of non-outage support TALTS >30 days old without an action plan per 0%
unit.
Strategy I
'.ition Plan 1.2B 9/16/97 Revision la Page 18 of 65
~
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Urit 1/U::it 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description
,a
---n
-_-n an_=
n~---a,_-~,--
n x
. _.x -
- - - _ ~ ~ -. - -
~ - - - - - ~
1.
Determine remainder ofTemp Alts to be removed prior to Unit Start Up.
2.
Close all Temp. Alts installed to support LIF35 3.
Complete necessary paperwork to close the following Temporary Alterations:
TALT l-0087-96, CIIANGE LIMITS OF ODG009 VALVE TO INCREASE VALVE TRAVEL. Water strainer flow change.
TALT l-0088-96, CHANGE LIMITS OF ODG011 VALVE TO INCREASE VALVE TRAVEL. Water strainer flow changes.
l TALT 1-0089-96, CIIANGE LIMIfS OF 1E22F319 VALVE TO INCREASE VALVE TRAVEL. Water strainer flow changes i
i Strategy I Action Plan 1.2B 9/16/97 Revision la Page 19 of 65
~
LcSalle County Nuclear Station U it 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan 4.
Complete resolution of 9 temporary alteration planned for work in LIF35:
TALT l-1636-88, CONTAMINATED RADWASTE MC PIPING BYPASSED BY TEMPORARY HOSE. Several hundred feet of hose supplies MC water from the turbine bldg thru the upper radwaste bldg and into the radwaste truck bay.
TALT l-0303-90, Two sightglasses have been replaced with hard pipe to eliminate leakages, a high pressure hose bypasses the normal seal cooling supply and allows seal cooling water to be supplied from the MDRFP discharge piping when discharge pressure < 1000 psig.
TALT l-0573-92, VP Holdup tank alarm and VP expansion tank tubing. An alarm for Hi level VP holdup tank is defeated and tygon tubing installed to the VP expansion tank for level indication.
TALT l-0058-96, LIFT LEAD ON OPS-FC001. Lifled lead allows Service Air to be isolated from the Fuel Pool Cooling system without tripping the FC system off The ability to precoat and backwash the FC filter demins is lost.
TALT l-0090-96, VC EMER M/UP CHARCOAL FILTER DRAIN VALVE. The east charcoal drain valve in OVColSB has a crack in it's body. A clamp has been installed around the valve to stop further crack propagation.
TALT l-0103-96, RCIC 1RIO7E-2 & 1RIO7F-3/4 INSULATION REMOVAL. A four foot section ofinsulation was removed to improve RCIC system performance.
TALT l-0106-96, DEFEAT ALARM MAIN TURB THRST BRG REAR PLATE TEMP. A bad thermocouple causing erratic elarms in Control Room.
TALT l-0123-96, BYPASS UNIT 1 VT FLOW PERMISSIVE TO ENERGIZE BLAST COILS. System Engineering states there is an underlying design flaws which why this TALT is required TALT l-0040-97, PIPE REPAIR CLAMP INSTALLED ON THE FIRE PROTECTION HEADER FOR THE OVC01FA CHARCOAL FILTER. Site Engineering will address pipe repairs as soon as the NEP 12 03LA, NDITs, is approved for use at LaSalle.
5.
Close all Temp Alts installed to support L2R07 6.
Complete resolution of temporary alterations planned for work in L2R07.
7.
Complete resolution of 2 temporary alterations that do not require an outage to resolve. TALT 100109-96 and TALT 2-0074-96 8.
Complete an Action Plan for each temporary alteration that is open on 1/31/97 that defines the resolution plan, schedule and responsible organization / individual.
Strategv 1 Action Plan 1.2B 9/16/97 Revision la Page 20 of 65
~
~
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan 9.
Implement a monthly review ofTemporary Alteration status (Operations, Maintenance, Work Control and Engineering) to establish a mutual agreement on open Temporary Alteration resolution priorities and schedule. Identify and resolve any issues that will prevent achieving performance standards to the Station Manager, includmg Tuiig.cy Alterations older than I cycle.
10.
Each TALT will have a closure plan that will be evaluated against restart caiteria.
I 1.
Provide written justification for Temp Alts that have been deferred from LIF35, defme the safety impact and the impact l l
on the operators in the plant and MCR. Unit Plant Manager and Operations Manager approval is required.
l Strategy I Action Plan 1.2B 9/16/97 Revision la Page 21 of 65
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Ucit 1/Ucit 2 Restart Pla2 Restart Action Plan IN$@ (d3@SdTU@f?@MEK ?$ $$@ sear STRATEGEd P %@ %^ $9? sly?tyfM ' ' @ %d Strategy No: 1
Title:
Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: S. Smith
==
Description:==
Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and pown operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:
-improving operator performance,
- reducing operator challenges, and
- correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation
-improve operator training.
+30sMNO$8 b dN wJ Wa25sifsdACDONPLAN had MM;a A ~m2icGL::_.m %uati*- jj EIeu ~ad b Action Plan No: 1.2C
Title:
Reduce Operator Challenges - Main Control Room Distractions
==
Description:==
Plant operators are unnecessarily challenged during normal, abnormal and emergency plant conditions due to a high number of distractions in the Main Control Room.
Objective: Reduce challenges to plant operators by reducing the number ofdist,ctions in the Main Control Room that may unnecessarily challenge them during normal, abnormal and emergency plant conditions.
Team Members: 1. R. Bengston
- 2. R. McConnaugha
- 3. B. Sly
- 4. J. Kutches
- 5. R. Gremchuk
- 6. L. Melander
- 7. D. Watson
- 8. J. Kodrick
- 9. A. Trainor ghar et ' w
@Pedierasance BidasureRF '* WP49
' M&#WA4h ^?g h Standasd I" 4?? NQ Minimization of MCR Distractions
<10 that cannot be supported by 12 week schedule pr2 cess.
Strategy 1 Action Plan 1.2C 9/16/97 Revision Ia Page 22 of 65
.=.
~
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description
- n =
u-u.u.-- --.
nn.-wnu,
-=- -- - -==~ ~=;.
_w
.- =
~=n-,
-. -=
1.
Schedule or complete an action plan for each MCR WR that is listed on the LIF35 MCR distraction list defining the resolution plan, schedule date and responsible individual / organization. Update on an ongoing basis.
2.
Establish a resolution plan to achieve a dark board in the MCR.. Implement a monthly review of open MCR WRs to establish a mutual agreement on open MCR WR resolution priorities and schedule. Identify any MCR distractions that will prevent achieving dark board concept at 100% power following unit restart. Unit Plant Manager or Operations Manager must approve any long-term alarms, including MCR WRs greater than I cycle..
3.
Establish objective criteria for emergent and existing MCR WR inclusion.
4.
Separate performance monitoring to units.
5.
Provide written justification for the MCR distractions that have been deferred to L1R08, define the safety impact and the impact on the operators in the MCR. Unit Plant Manager and Operations Manager approval is required.
6.
Plan of the Day - Daily discussion on Dark Board impacts, open Work Requests, alarms present, etc.
i Strategy I r
Action Plan 1.2C i
9/16/97 Revision la Page 23 of 65
LcSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/Uzit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan DfN%@!b~ h d$af - [" " 4 Qdh jW hs#&hjhSTRATEGY74F gg M g m;
,%, m
?Y m" Strategy No: 1
Title:
Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: S. Smith
==
Description:==
Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driven organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:
1
-improving operator performance,
- reducing operator challenges, and
- correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation
- improve operator training.
u _ 4& -
m ' mLjj E 9dNP
'f : '
bgf@ fdd54 e.M Y%fdj3%CTIONPLANges dbJmM Action Plan No: 1.3 A
Title:
Correct Processes that Challange Safe Plant Operations - Plant Labeling
==
Description:==
Weaknesses in plant bbeling impact the ability of station personnel to implement safe plant operation and maintenance and has contributed to many out-of-service errors.
Objective: Implement labeling upgrades to plant equipment so that the potential for ou:-of-service and personnel error is minimized.
Implement upgrades during unit shutdown to plant equipment located in areas with limited access during normal operation and on sensitive instrumentation so that the potential for unit trip during normal operation is minimized.
Team Members: 1 G. Ford 2
J. Gables 3
L. Johnson 4.
B. Stone
- 5. G. Weiland
- 5. B. Murphy
- 6. T. Boyle
- 7. M. Barta
- 8. B. Murphy
- 9. M Gray
- 10. M. Smith
- 11. T. Winkler
- 12. L. Murphy
- 13. N. Munoz
- 14. J. Engleman
- 15. B. Werder 16 D. Nicklin 17 R. Patterson
+i e
'% r
' iG "
Fles6erunamee9tamadasd "
9FssfonmanceMsesure M w
ME l Minimize IIuman Performance Errors as a result oflabeling deficiencies.
Labeling deficiencies identified during " fast cruise" procedure w21kdowns are corrected.
t..-
r Strategy I Action Plan 1.3A 9/16/97 Revision la Page 24 of 65 w
~
LaSalle Cou-ty Nuclear Station Ucit 1/Ucit 2 Restart Plam Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description
- - = - -,
w
-=a.
--=-
c.w
~--~~n
-~
.w. w=
=p==axw m m w.za m a 1.
Labeling Milestones For Unit 1 Stanup 1.1.1 PROVIDE TRAINING FOR LABEL INSTALLATION Non-licensed Operator Training (Classroom) Module 97-1 1.1.2 "Just In Time" Training (Hands On) (OPS, EM, IM, MM)
U.
Label RB Safety Related & Sensitive Instrument Racks (Approx. 2032 labels in 19 Panels) 1.2.1
- Engineer 1.2.2
- Approve 1.2.3
- Order 1.2.4
- Fabricate (Electromark) 1.2.5
- Receipt Inspect / Package 1.2.6
- Install (IM Techs) 1.2.7
- Verify (IM Techs) 1.3 Upgrade Labeling for Safety Related DC Systems (Div. I, II, III, & 24V & 250V DC Charge s) 1.3.1
- Engineer 1.3.2
- Approve 1.3.3
- Order 1.3.4
- Fabricate (Electromark) 1.3.5
- Receipt Inspect / Package 1.3.6
- Pending Design Change (DCR) (Approx.12 components) 1.3.7
- Install (Craft Contractor Installers) 1.3.8
- Verify (Craft Contractor Installers)
Strategy I Action Plan I.3A 9/16/97 Revision Ia Page 25 of 65
. _ _ = _ _
lll l1j A5 1
6 v J f
ge I
o ta n6 r a2 t
l S P e g s
n a oP ucA
)50 1
.xorpp A
(s tnenop moC ro j
n a
o M
i n
t
)
a a m
t l
SP n o rt a o rl R ae aP O l
t nU c s u e oi i
NRtcd a
l n
y2A a n
t t s
o t
)
i udr m 0
s i
a o 7
v oUt o e
1 C/s R R
1 e
x et RI o
U l i r
la n p
)
2 p
SU 59 A
(
a s
)
)
(
s s
4 L
m r
r s
o e
e x
e l
l a
a o
v o
l l
l r
R t
t a
s s
p V
G n
n p
A I
I t
D e
r r
(
)
e n
e s
k g
e
)
g o
o
(
k c
c e
r a
m k
g
)3 a
t t
r a
c a
a v
a k
u a
k n
a t
t a
m c
r r
r l
m c
a t
a i
)
s P
n n
V o
P n
o P
g D
/
o o
r t
/
r I
/
t n
t t
c C
C d
c c
d e
e M
t c
c i
e n
e e
l M
p t
t a
e n
l l
E p
a E
p f
f b
s a
a s
s s
a
(
(
n r
r t
n s
(
n L
r e
e I
C C
n r
e e
I t
r e
e I
e v
a n
e v
a t
t
(
(
e e
v a
t t
e e
t n
e e
e t
d n
o r
c p
f o
n o
r c
p y
y m
n o
r c
p l
l i
l r
e r
e a
i l
f i
r e
i a
i i
r e
a r
e i
e p
g p
d b
c t
r r
g p
d b
c t
r i
i i
i m
g p
d b
c r
g n
p r
a e
s e
m n
p r
a e
s e
n p
r a
e n
n t
p E
A O
F R
V o
E A
O F
R V
s E
A O
F R
I I
U n
C I
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
1 2
3 4
5 97 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
3 3
3 3
3 6
/
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
1
/
1 l
1 1
l 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
l 1
1 1
1 1
9
{
1l['
~
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Ucit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan 1.4.3.6
- Install (Craft Contractor Installers) 1.4.3.7
- Verify (Craft Contractor Installers) 1.5.
Upgrade Major Component Labeling in limited access areas (Approx. 315 components)
)
1.5.1
- Engineer 1.5.2
- Approve 1.5.3
- Order 1.5.4
- Fabricate (MMD/Electromark) 1.5.5
- Receipt Inspect / Package 1.5.6
- Install (Crafi Contractor Installers) 1.5.7
- Verify (Craft Contractor Installers) 1.6.
Provide adequate (5) MMD personnel in the sign shop for label fabrication and installation 2.0 Labeling Milestones for Unit 2 Startup 2.1.
Update Unit 2 labeling plan with milestone dates.
2.2.
Provide Training for Label Installation "Just in Time" Training (Hands On - OPS, EM, IM, MM) 2.3.
Upgrade Labeling of RB Safety Related and Sensitive Instrument Racks (Approx. 2032 labels in 19 panels) 2.3.1
- Engineer 2.3.2
- Approve 2.3.3
- Order 2.3.4
- Fabricate (Electromark) 2.3.5
- Receipt Inspect / Package 2.3.6
- Install (IM Techs) 2.3.7
- Verify (IM Techs)
Strategv 1 Action Plan 1.3A 9/16/97 Redsion la Page 27 ef 65
)llljlllj1il j
~
A5 I
y 6
gJf eI o ta n8 r a 2 t
l S P e g n a oP itcA
)sregra hC CD V
0 52 no V
it a:
42 a a SP n&
t l
rt a I
I a rl e aP I
l t
I
)
c s nI s
t u e oI n
i NRt ne a
c v I
o i
y2AD p
n t t
(
o nit m
u n r s is o
d oUta m c
e e
2 R
C/s ts 1
1 e y et RS x.
l i o
l c
C a
r
)
SU D
p 7
p 2
a d
A m
3 s
L e
t o
x a
R o
0 o
leR C
R 7
r x
p y
D G
o p
A t
(
e D
e
(
r e
)
p f
k g
e r
a g
)
p g
a s
a e
S a
k n
2 A
k v
f m
c a
(
a h
f c
l o
o P
C o
s
)
a a
P V
g r
/
g n
D
/
t t
t n
n c
c g
t n
e M
c d
il e
e i
l i
l n
e n
e b
E p
s e
o M
p a
s e
b p
s s
a
(
n D
a
(
L m
n t
L r
e e
I r
e e
I n
r e
e v
a e
t t
g o
e v
a t
e e
v e
e t
d n
o r
c p
n C
e n
e n
o r
c p
y d
l y
f o
n o
r l
i i
f i
l r
e r
e d
a i
l a
r e
r e
a i
i i
a r
i r
e r
g p
d b
c n
t r
r o
g p
d b
c t
r p
g p
d i
i g
n p
r a
e e
n V
p a
s e
g j
n p
r a
e s
e m
n p
r p
E A
O F
R P
I n
E A
O F
R V
o E
A O
U U M I
C 2
3 4
5 6
7 l.-
2 3
9 7
1 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 6
/
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
1
/
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
9 1ll.l
lIil1'
~
A5 I
y3 6 g
f e 1 o
ta n9 r a2 t
l S P e g
aPa tcA
.n o
i
)
t s
a t
l l
n a
e t
n s
o n
i p
d m
n o
a c
n 5
o n
1 it o
3 a
it a x
c i
a a o
r t
l r
ba SP n p
f p
a r t l
a rl A
e e aP
(
b s
a l
t l
c s n a
u e o e
r r
o t
a f
NRi a
c s
p I
s o
y2 A e
h n
t t c
s o
)
i nit c
s u r r 1
a n
i 8
g v
a oUt d
e 1
i e
s R
C1/ s t
e e
x i
o m
h et R r
t l
i i
p n
l la n p
n i
SU A
i l
a
)
)
(
g en s
s n
L r
r s
n i
e e
ev e
o l
l l
b
)
s l
l a
a a
a k
e l
r t
t s
s V
L a
P r
n n
m D
I I
t t
n n
e r
r e
e o
e
)k g
o o
e
)
m k
g n
g M
r r
a t
t t
r a
o c
a M
a k
c c
m c
a a
u a
k p
e k
m c
l r
r r
c
)
a m
E a
5 a
t t
ts o
P n
n o
P o
P
(
r n
t
/
o o
r C
D I
/
/
t t
t e
c c
C C
d e
e r
t c
c e
e M
c t
s a
a a
E p
o e
a E
p t
t n
l l
M p
u f
f s
j s
q n
r r
s
(
a
(
n
(
n e
M C
C e
I t
r e
e I
r e
e I
d n
e v
a t
t t
e v
a t
(
(
t a
t a
e e
e e
c p
p y
f d
n o
r c
p f
m n
o r
c ie a
a y
l l
y e
l i
l l
i i
l r
e a
r e
r i
i f
i r
e ir e
a d
i u
g p
d b
c t
r r
g p
d b
c t
i i
i b
c t
r r
a e
s e
r t
n p
r a
e s
e g
n p
r a
e s
e v
F R
n V
n n
s E
A O
F R
V p
E A
O F
R V
o I
n I
I r
U I
P 4
5 6
7 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
79 2
2 2
2 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
1
/6 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 6.
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 7
/
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 9
ll
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Ikit UUnit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan U sf Mk Ji%d%,,
- a%
ri*
-. SEEATE Q w & w a w L %
=
Strategy No: 1
Title:
Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: S. Smith Destription: Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-drhtn organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by:
-improving operator performance,
- reducing operator challenges, and
- correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation
-improve operator training bi:aa=.:=w^?Nlmy JW?TM x JC11DNFLAN N.-w
_]
~ Fl t
Action Plan No: 1.3B
Title:
Correct Processes that Challange Safe Plant Operations - Out-of-Senice Program
==
Description:==
Many out-of-service errors have occurred with human performaace, process and procedure problems being the largest root causes for the errors.
Objective: Utilize self-assessments to identify problems and implement corrective actions to establish expectations and focus for error reduction in the out-of-senice program by implementing accountability for performance, incre:: sing supenisory imuhrment and oversight, and resohing barriers that currently prevent station personnel from correctly implementing program requirements.
Team Memben: 1 G. Putt
- 2. J. Hedenschoug
- 3. C. Maney
- 4. T. Baughman gw
~, w w y
.m mm
+
.,~.cc';
Frequency of resetting Event Free Clock due to OOS errors.
Average time between resetting station clock increues Reduction ofOOS errors (while maintaining a high sensithity fur Decreasing trend of OOS errors identified per month identific:,iion oferrors)
Strategy I Action Plan I.38 9/16/97 Revision Ia Page 30 of 65 a
O LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description v
. ~ ~ = =
=.
~~
=
.=
L Provide enhanced training of Operating OOS writers (NSOs and SROs) (use of OOS Actions Checklist, OOS writing good practices, lessons learned, etc) 2.
Revise OOS Procedure and remove T/L'ed OOS cards from Master Board. (To minimize confusion when hanging personnel protection cards, standardize process like other nu&ar sites) 3.
Provide guidance in OPS Memo #19 for hanging OOS cards with respect to proper labeling ofequipment (Minimize the probability of hanging an OOS card on the wrong component, enhance the effort to properly label components in the plant.
4.
Provide bar-code readers for workers to verify OOS status. (Improve worker trust in the OOS pv3 ram by making information important to their safety readily available) 5.
Revise LAP-900-4 to address streamlining procedure, and incorporating the Global OOS process (P.emove sections of the OOS procedure which provide computer related instructions and allow procuiure to more clearly define how work is performed and what our responsibilities are, allow the procedure to compliment the Global Cad Erdwesrd)
Provide training for affected department:
MAINT: GIN & Communication Meetings OPS: GIN & *Just-in-Time" Training (per AEM) 6.
Revise procedures and train operators to perform independent verification " Apart-in-Time' for all OOS checklists.
(Perform work in a manner which allows the highest probability of providing OOSs which will protect the worker while still maintaining safe operations of the plant, standardize the process like other nucicar sites)
Provide training for Operating Department GIN and Crew Communication Meetings 7.
Provide training for maintenance personnel on revised LAP-100-30 (Independent Verification) l 8.
Additional Corrective Actions to address Planning and Scheduling Issues 1
i 8.I Corporate SQV Investigation 8.2 Formal Root Cause Investigation i
8.3 Mechanical / Electrical Lineup Verification 1
8.4 Operations Outage Interface Group Established i
Strategy I Acuon Ptan 1.3B 9/16/97 Rensxm la Page 31 of 65
B5 I
6 y 3 f
geI o 1
1 I
ta n2 r a3 t
l S P e g
n a oP ucA no it n a a t l sn SP n o
rt a it a rl a
e aP re s
l t
c s n p
e
~
d ue o O
i o
NRt o
C a
c t
I r
y2 A d
o n
t t e
i o
nit n
v is u n r g
a i
h a
a i
oUt s
e e
s s
A B
p R
C/s o
1 e d et Rio r
n c
o a
S I
i m
r I
n e
a t
n aSU P
n u
i H
d i
a y
d e
a r
s L
d o
s it 7-o e
m r
C d
i r
I o
t d
s f
a A
c.
n "n
t t
o o
i e
d a
z e
v o
r s
r e
s i
F A
v s
e b
e f-R O
l l
u e
S D
D M
d R
R e
A A
c c
C C
S n
e e
E E
i g
r R
R
=
e d
p O
O x
C C
iO E
S S
79
/6 5
6 7
8 1
/
8 8
8 8
9 llll
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plao Restart Action Plan J
y-STRATEGY ~ -
~
~
+
[N a1' 91f-Strategy No: 1
Title:
Safe Plant Operation Sponsor: S. Smith
==
Description:==
Establish a strong focus on operational safety and become an Operations-driun organization so that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achiestd by-
-improving operator performance.
- reducing operator challen;;es, and
- correcting processes that challenge safe plant operation
-improve operator training.
k
- La u:giaR1A?
Wah-WACHONFLAN_
- wtm Nm j
m m _m Action Plan No: 1.3C
Title:
Correct Processes that Chaliange Safe Plant Operations - Operating Procedures
==
Description:==
Poor quality procedures challenge the ability of plant operators to implement expectations for procedure use and comphance and hinder objectives for safe operation. In addition, the scope and duration of the outage require many operations procedures to be revised to reflect pla:4 configuration and to satisfy testing requirements Objective: Review and revise, as required, Operating procedures necessary to implement safe unit restart and power operation 'Ihe following procedures will be resiewed:
- Reactor Safety - LOR, LOA, LGA and PRA significant
- Procedures used in unit start up Surveillance required for continued operation beyond the refuel cycle
- Procedures affected by DCPs.and
- Administrative procedures implementing change and adherence Team Members: 1. S. Seabom
- 2. L. Nickel
- 3. R Immke
- 4. B. Boyd
- 5. B. Stone
- 6. Ops Proc Writers gh genge s 1 - r
~ 1 hSandmed
^ -
- 3 g-at l Operating Procedure quality improves Improving Trend as indicated by-
)
Procedure-related PIFs, TPCs with p%wst change required, i
Procedure deficiencies (TPCs, PCRs) identified during fast cruise procedure walkdowns are corrected.
Strategv 1 Acton Plan I.3C 9/16/97 Rension la Page 33 of 65
_ _. = _........
~
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description m.m _ _m.
m mc c-m _
__s_ m
-.m.__
1.
Additional Scope Discovery 1.1.
Review surveillances and identify those to be perfonned prior to start up which need revision from initial roiew (Unit I and Unit 2) 1 2.
Review all procedures used to perform a start up and identify those needing raision from initial review (Unit I and Unit 2) 1.3.
Roiew all L1F35 DCPs and tabulate required procedure roisions. Unit i Only.
I.4.
Review all L2R07 DCPs and tabulate required procedure revisions Unit 2 Only.
1.5.
Initiate weekly review of station schedule for expanding scope in each category; reflect changing scope in metrics 1.6.
Initial review ofStart Up issues (PIFs, AIRS, System Functional Assessments) Scope will be updated as additional items are identified (Unit I and Unit 2) 1.7.
Present plan to Operating crews for procedure review and validation.
2.
Complete LOA upgrade (Unit I and Unit 2)
DC LOA scope expanded from DC system functional assessment.
3.
Complete LOR conversion and reduce existing editorial PCRs 100%.
4.
Incorporate Category 4 Tech Spec Clarifications into procedures.
5.
Revise operating procedures to execute L1F35 work windows.
5.1.
CD, CW, FW, HD, AP (BUS DROPS) 5.3.
5.6.
MP, MS Strasco I Acuon Plan I.3C 9/16/97 Rension la Page 34 of 65
i LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan 5.7.
S/U LGPs, RI, TG, RT 4
1
}
, 6.
Upgrade EOP support procedures: mmove 50.54x reference and incorporate all PCRs j
t 7.
Revise procedure change process and procedure adherence reqtao..m.s to strengthen / streamline procedure adherence. LAP-820-2T Scope expanded to include new organi7= tion titles. Completed on 3/15/97.
8.
Assign a procedure writer to each crew to rotate with the crew 9.
Complete revision of Startup Procedures identified in Step I.2
- - _ _.. ~... +...... - _. -......... -.,,. ~., -,.....
~
d l
i i
k WI l
Acuan Plan 1.3C 9/16/97 Redsion la Page 35 cf 65 i
n
~
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plas Restart Action Plan
%lBiW M Uyl*%@li 3 ?fj*j M[g W ki Wl? M gLgg pyggaggga g )gq j g g g.gg g g g Strateg No: 2
Title:
Iluman Performance Sponsor: D. Boone
==
Description:==
Improve human performance to support safe plant operation. Improve human interactions, focusing on teamwork and engagement of the work force, to support improved human performance.
Eir M " :er ~.
- J#9Nsdt35P '
"^) n ?@h-ZIlsAE FN*[$$M %ma
%= c d ON^'i.
i Action Plan No: 2.1 1
Title:
Iluman Performance and Interaction
==
Description:==
Provide clear expectations to site workers; communicate site direction; coach and mentor workers during theirjob actisities.
Monitor site Iluman Performance and address barriers to improvement.
Objective: To provide a near-term step-change in the Iluman Performance and team work ofsite workers.
Teams Members: 1. D. Boone
- 2. J. Gieseker
- 3. F. Dacimo
- 4. D. Sanchez
- 5. R. Ragan
- 6. P. Resler
- 7. T. Cardenas
- 8. LMT
[7+
' Wym.-
' Flesformanne.asmanuse M m s s9e lls
' ' :$ H Z 3 g d umeesse m andmed ;-
^
Event Free Clock Resets l Improving trend evaluated by LMT.
Strategy 2 Act2on Plan 2.1 9/16/97 Redsnon Ia Page 36 of 65
s LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description m
.m emm.
mm. _
m m._
m-mm
.m
.- m 1.
Expectations - Establish clear expectations for human perfonnance and interaction.
1.1.
Communicate expectations to Lead Management Team 1.2.
Communicate expectations for LaSalle workers at an All Station Meeting: (provide sideo tape for workers not able to attend).
1.3.
Develop a " talking paper" with basic contribution from all LaSalle employees; to include expectations for strict procedure compliance, use of selfchecking (STAR) for all work activities, always have a questioning attitude and demand resolution ofissues.
j 1.4.
Communicate expectations in one-on-one sessions with all employees 1.5.
Develop a video taped presentation of Bill Subalusky and Fred Dacimo to communicate LaSaIIe expectations to all new LaSalle employees. Use in NGET and for periodic reinforcement for all employres.
2.
Follow-up - Follow-up to ensure expectations are understood and being applied in daily work activities.
2.1 Ensure that all LaSalle Supervisors have attended, or scheduled to attend, coaching /obsenation training and MARC training.
2.2.
LaSalle supervisors (FLS and above) perform routine observations and coaching ofworkers in the field, to be documented at least weekly.
2.3.
Develop Station meeting schedule to enable LMT to spend more time in persennel development / coaching.
l 2.4.
Provide weekly trending information to supenisors on human performance related PIFs.
l 2.5.
Evaluate Dresden's " Management by Walking Around* and " area owner" programs for applicability at LaSalle.
l Implement if appropriate.
3.
Training - Implement training to facilitate improved human performance.
3.1.
Develop periodic topics stressing human performance fundamentals for human performance day presentations.
3.2.
Prepare video simulations of significant human performance initiatives or events during presious month to be used for discussion by departments during human performance discussions.
Strategy 2 Acuon Plan 2.I 9/16/97 Revision la Page 37 of 65
LaSalle County Nacicar Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan 3.3.
Complete currently developed STAR simulator training for appropriate pesessd.
3.4.
Obtain STAR simulator modeled after the South Texas Project trainer, prepare lesson plan and begin training for plant personnel.
4.
Accountability - Establish clear accountability for resohing human performance weaknesses and to climinate repeat of human performance errors.
4.1.
Follow-up meetings to be held within one shift of any significant human performance related event that resets a Departmental Event Free Clock. Attendees at this meeting to include indhiduals who were imvhrd in the incident, his immediate supervision, and the Department Head / Manager or his representathc. The goal of the meeting is to determine the cause of the event and actions rey to prevent recurrence.
4.2.
Follow-up meetings to be held within three days for any significant human performance related event that resets the Station Event Free Clock. Attendees to includ: individuals who were invohed in the incident, immediate supervision, Department Head and Station Manager.
I 4.3.
Implement accountability in daily acthities through the MARC process and the Commit For Results process 4.4.
Ensure accountability is implemented consistently throughout the orgamzation through timely discussion ofissues, including how they are dispositioned, at weekly LMT and/or monthly site Protocol meetings.
5.
Communication - Improve organizational communications.
5.1.
Conduct weekly communication meetings with Department Heads and bargaining unit personnel.
5.2.
Implement " Reliable Source" program to ensure accurate dissemination ofinformation throughout the organization.
5.3.
Develop ability to use CETV for real time broadcasts to all locations from the SVP's office, the Station Manager's Office, the LaSalle Room, and the Morris Room.
5.4.
Regularly communicate the status of the restart plan and system functional reviews.
I strategy 2 Acuon Plan 2.I 9/16/97 Revision la Page 33 of 65
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan
- &+x z.,qsyy+y=m y w
- Mm' m ezw ;;w m o m* w w g g m _ sre w wr%
pa wwne~ s: w y mwr, 2n:
- m..
au mde
.m
- v; wwa u,su rn -
g er +:- 1
' Mhw e Strategy No: 3
Title:
Plant Materiel Condition Sponsor: P. Higgins
==
Description:==
Implement strong outage management oversight to ensure that planned outage actisities are effectively completed and result in significant materiel condition improvements necessary for safe unit restart and power operation. This will be achieved by implementing a Unit I and Unit 2 Outage Plan and a Maintenance Backlog Resiew Plan that:
- focuses on a single unit,-
- identifies and approves the final work scope, and-
-improves schedule adherence m
+e yg ggg4 mg-gg
- gg ggggg mgy sya gq Action Plan No
- 3.1
Title:
Unit 1 Outage Plan -
==
Description:==
A detailed outag-implementation plan is required to ensure that the required Unit I outage work is defined and that all station resources are properly aligned to safely complete the work.
Objective: Develop and implement a Unit 1 outage plan that identifies and organizes the completion of all required plant work necessary to improve the plant materiel condition such that there is high confidence in safe unit startup and power operation.
Team Members: 1. P. Higgins
- 2. K. Francis
- 3. J. Shetterly 4
D. Dauzvardis
- 5. J. Rosner
- 6. L. Ebersole
- 7. J. Steele
- 8. T. Riner
- 9. J. Klika
- 10. C. Maney
- 11. J. Damron
- 12. P. Thouvenin
- 13. P. Weber
- 14. P. Sprole
- 15. S. Rashidi y
g gg my ',
,; m m ;-
' ggg;3 engy :
mm Scope growth after work discovery milestones
<=5%
i Complete System walkdowns and backlog reviews.
Per schedule graph l
Complete System Functional P.eviews Per schedule graph Critical Path Performance On or ahead ofschedule.
Strategy 3 Acuon Plan 3.1 9/16/97 Redsion la Page 39 of 65
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan Action Milestone Descriptiom Step #
______m_______mm___
~. _ _
m 1.
Focus on the successful restart of a single unit.
1.1.
Confirm site resource availability for planning and schb%g work required for Unit One restart 1.2.1 Establish Unit One restart schedule based on defined work scope. Phase I 1.2.2 Establish Unit One restart schedule based on defined work scope Phase II 1.2.3 Establish Unit One restart schedule based on defined work scope. PhaseIII 2.
Identify and approve final work scope necessary for unit restart.
2.1.
Establish Senior Management Resiew Committee 2.2.
Review status of System Design and Functional Reviews required for unit restart (includes resiew of OP Work-Arounds, MCR Deficiencies, ARs and NWRs) and determine if additional reviews are required.
2.3.
Conduct a Unit One plant readiness review process for selected system to include:
- Validate existing work scope (to include system w~alkdowns),
- Evaluate backlog ofwork outstanding
- Validate system testing adequacy
- Review backlog of Engineering Requests for potential scope impact
- Complete review ofOutage PIF backlog for scope impact
- Review Operating Evaluations for degraded equipment l
l 2.3.1 Validate Unit One required Surveillance / Scope 2.3.1.1 Define surveillances which need to be performed prior to next refuel outage 2.3.1.2 Perform regulatory review of defined scope to validate regulatory requirements are met 2.4.1 Document discovery results on system basis.
2.4.2 Perform Confirmatory System Readiness review for all systems in original scope (Step 2.3 above) 2.4.3 Present a consolidated status of Unit One System Readiness to Management prior to restart.
2.5.
Complete Documentation Reviews required prior to restart Strategv 3 A:;uon Plan 3 I 9/16/97 Redsion Ia Page 40 of 65
LaSalle County NuckcrStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan 2.5.1 Tech Spec Clarifications 2.5.2 -
Past Plant Trips and Transients 2.5.3 IIistorical (non-Outage) LER's, DVR's and Root Cause Reports 2.6.
Complete Operations review of final unit one outage scope and backlog (Control Room, Temp Alts, Work-Arounds) for scope impact.
2.7.
Evaluate procedure needs for expanded outage scope and prepare plan to complete procedure revisions H support of restart schedule ) (Ref Ops Plan 1.3. for OP procedures) 2.7.1 Define Scope 2.7.2 Implement Plan 2.7.3 Track completion performance weekly and make corrections as necessary 3.
Improve Schedule Adherence 3.1.
Implement Daily outage management Department IIcads Meetings 3.2.
Obtain Manager commitment to schedule development and implementation; ensure all dwiutusts are represented in schedule preparation.
3.3.
Outage Manager conduct daily schedule adherence meeting.
Strategv 3 Action Plan 3.1 9/I6/97 Redsion la Page 41 of 65
___=__... - -..
a LaSalle County Nucicar Station Unit UUnit 2 Restart Plao Restart Action Plan xx ggggm
~
m ~ ; yw,;m ~3;pV
- ~
+
Strategy No: 3 f
Title:
Plant Materiel Condition Sponsor: P. IIiggins
==
Description:==
Implement strong outage management oversight to ensure that planned outage acthities are effecthely completed and result in significant materiel condition improvements necessary for safe unit restart and power operation. His will be achieved by implementing a Unit I and Unit 2 Outage Plan and a Maintenance Backlog Resiew Plan that:
- focuses on a single unit,-
- identifies and approves the final work scope, and-
-improves schedule adherence kl ah 2 W L i c- -m ' mL.==::aACE10N]EAND
~
<F d
~
x Action Plan No: 3.2
Title:
Unit 2 Outage Plan
==
Description:==
A detailed outage implementation plan is required to ensure that the required Unit 2 outage work is defined and that all station resources are properly aligned to safely complete the work l
Objective: Develop and implement a Unit 2 outage plan that identifies and organizes the completion of all required plant work necessary to improve the plant materiel condition such that there is high confidence in safe unit startup and power operation.
Team Members: 1.
P. IIiggins
- 2. K. Francis
- 3. J. Shetterly
- 4. D. Dauzvardis
- 5. J. Rosner
- 6. L. Ebersole
- 7. J. Steele
- 8. T. Rmer
- 9. J. Klika
- 10. C. Mancy
- 11. J. Damron
- 12. P. Thouvenin
- 13. P. Weber
- 14. P. Sprole
- 15. S. Rashidi p
% wr
~
s+
jap ca34; hw j
^
Scope growth after work discovery milestones
<=5%
Complete System walkdowns and backlog reviews.
Per schedule graph Complete System Functional Reviews Per schedule graph Critical Path Performance On or ahead ofschedule.
1 l
l Strategt 3 Acuon Ptan 3.2 9/16/97 Revtsion Ia Page 42 of 65
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description n
c :~- -
=n-
-n
-.. =.
-~
1.
Focus on the successful restart of a single unit.
1.1.
Confirm site resource availability for planning and scheduling work required for Unit Two restart 1.2.
Establish Unit Two restart schedule based on defined work scope.
2.
Identify and approve fmal work scope necessary for unit restart 2.1.
Conduct a Unit Two plant readiness review process for selected system to include: (Ref Plan 3.2 Operational Readiness)
- Validation ofexisting work scope (to include system walkdowns),
- Evaluate backlog ofwork outstanding.
- Validate system testing adequacy, and
- Review backlog of Engineering Requests, Optage PIFs, and Operability Evaluations for potential scope impact
- Complete review of Outage PIF backlog for scope impact
- Review Operating Evaluations for degraded equipment 2.1.1 Validate Unit Two required Surveillance /PM Scope 2.1.1.1 Define surveillances which need to be performed prior to next refuel outage 2.1.1 2 Perform regulatory review of defined scope to validate regulatcry requirements are met 2.2.
Complete Documentation Reviews required prior to restart.
2.2.1 Tech Spec Clarifications.
2.2.2 Past Plant Trips and Transients 2.2.3 Historical (non-outage) LERs, DVRs, and Root Cause Reports 2.3.
Document results ofreadiness resiews on system basis.
2.4.
Present a consolidated status of Unit Two System Readiness to management prior to restart ( as dermed in Step 2.1, but excluding open System Functional Reviews)
Strategy 3 Acuon Plan 3.2 9/16/97 Revision la Page 43 of 65
.. _ - - _. _. =
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan l
Restart Action Plam 2.5.
Complete Operations review of final Unit Two outage scope and backlog (Control Room, Temp Alts. Work-Arounds) for scopeimpact 2.6.
Evaluate procedure needs for expanded outage scope and prepare plan to complete procedure revisions in support of i
restart schedtJe (Ref. Ops Plan 13.c for OP procedures) 2.6.I Define Scope 2.6.2 Implement Plan per Outage Schedule 2.6.3 Track completion performance weekly and make corrections as rhy 3.
Improve Schedule Adherence 3.1.
Implement daily outage management Dei-L si Heads Meetings l
3.2.
Obtain Manager commitment to schedule development and imArstation; ensure all departments are represented in schedule preparation.
i 33.
Outage Manager conduct daily schedule adherence meeting.
.......... -........ -... _...................... _. _... ~......
i s
I i
Strategy 3 Acuon Plan 3.2 l
9/16/97 Revision Ia Page 44 of 65 i
l
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan
%c cx-
~.
..+- en.g <
w m ', en '
yp j et ggggg
+
,; gag c~
Strategy No: 3
Title:
Plant Materiel Condition Sponsor: P. Iliggins
==
Description:==
Implement strong outage management oversight to ensure that planned outage activities are effectively completed and result in I
significant materiel condition improvements necessary for safe unit restart and power operation. This will be achieved by implementing a Unit I and Unit 2 Outage Plan and a Maintenance Bacidog Review Plan that:
- focuses on a singic unitc
- identifies and approves the final work scope, and-
-improves schedule adherence
+1 bb ^2 M ^' a s ai EE._.mACHON PLAN
~
Jaf
^
n:
m u.
Action Plan No: 3.3
Title:
Maintenance Backlog Resiew Plan
==
Description:==
A review of the NWR Corrective backlog is required to insure that both units are ready to preside safe and reliabie power through the next operating cycle.
Objective: Complete a review of the NWR Corrective backlog to define that level which provides acceptable plant materiel condition such that there is high confidence in safe unit startup and power operation.
Team Members: 1. P. liiggins
- 2. A. Javorik
- 3. II. Vinyard 4.
D. Farr
- 5. G Campbe3
- 6. J. Kodrick
- 7. K. Francis
%w w
4;;
7 up %g j
n p1 Corrective Nuclear Work Request Backlog Corrective NWRs required for Startup Complete Strategt 3 Acuon Plan 3.3 9/16/97 Revision la Page 45 of 65
,I 3 35 6 y 3 g
f e n c t
a 6
a l
r P 4 tS n e I
o g u a t
c P in A
U
- eg a
tuo dnaega tuo
-non e
.-du lcn I(e
~ v itc n
- e o
r p
i r
t n
o u
t i
t n
a a c
r a
u t l n
t SP n
- a. o S
hc rt a N
o p
a a rl u
e e aP s
t t
l t
- - v r
r f
o a
o c s n u e o
- e i
t v
r s
U p
=
n NRi it t
/
a tc o
i c
d n
S l
i e
e u
e o
n y2A p
o t
r t
l r
e o
u t
o t t i
l nit r
cn r c
. C p
t d
r i
m r
e o
s a
s i
oUt o
h r
e y
o e
i c
p R
C/s D
b r
s c
p s
1 e n
e e
k e
et R n
o t
i w
b n
h s
o t
a l i l
n o
T d
s t
t a
t k
u e
r SU s
o R
l a
m p
p e
a l
W i
er s
m p
L M
b u
o us N
c d
=
o e
r n
T o
t v
a f
y t
i e
- x. g v
y t
c i
o i
l l
e i
l t
g b
r k
c r
c e
n a
o i
l a
r dr a
C i
r b
o o
v f
R C
c a
o c
e n
W h
a c
o c
s N r
k i
i u
t h
r a
w o
o e
l l
s p
w e
to e
r m
t n
e w.
m u
m o
i l
c 2
d 1
2 r
2 I
2 I
e2 r
1 i
t e
f i
, ed e
it t
e t
t i
t t
d t
t v
t i
n n
n h
i i
i i
i i
c n
n o
n n
u n
n n
Ra D
U U
S U
U C
U U
A U
U
=
~
o# -
n 7
ip 9
t e ~...
/6 ct 1
2 3
1 2
1 2
AS1.
2 2
2 3
3 3
4.
1 2
5 5
9 1
/
4 4
5 f
l
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plao Restart Action Plan m-my
+; y y
y y y y: ; ~
Strategy No: 4
Title:
Engineering Support Sponsor: G. Poletto
==
Description:==
Conduct programmatic assessments, and Upgrade engineering capability so that plant problems are identified and those required to be completed prior to unit restart are effectively resohrd such that an uneventful restart is achieved and long, uneventful power run is achieved.
- j imACDON FRAN e-
-,R
~
Em Gii
..J mm.
Action Plan No: 4.1
Title:
Engineering Capability
==
Description:==
Engineering work products do not meet standards necessary for the effectist support ofplant operational and maintenance activities and do not consistently include sufficient technical basis to ensure that the plant design basis is maintained The technical capability, judgment and work quality of Engineering requires hnprovement to support safe unit restart and power operation.
Objective: Upgrade the capability of Engineering to support safe unit restart and power operation through the addition ofexperienced personnel, additional training of existing personnel and organizational and progammatic changes to ensure that work products meet acceptable quality standards.
Team Members: 1. A. Javorik
- 2. G. Poletto
- 3. W. Eifert
- 4. J. Pollock p
.2 <
4 % ngeasuse
_'- r 1
- Fesforunamee W ^
4 -:
1
~
System Engineer Qualification Completion as scheduled Engineering Assurance assessment of selected engineering products (e.g.
Improsing trend.
calculations, DCPs, safety evaluations, operability evaluations, LERs, response to NOVs.)
Strategv 4 Action Plan 4.1 9/16/97 Revision la Page 47 of 65
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit UUnit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description
.. ~-
- - - =
~
1.0 Complete system qualifications for all System Engineering personnel for assigned systems. All systems will hase System Engineers assigned. His will include both incumbent and contractor personnel Contractor personnel qualification will be determined on a case-by-case basis considering previous erperience and observed capability.
Assess personnel capability as required to develop fully capable System En@wLg organization. Revise training syllabus to resohr known deficiencies.
1.1.
Determine system qualification requirements and methods for achieving; the System Functional Performance Roiew program and System Readiness Review process will be used as an imoortant part of the qualification process An oral review board will be used to assist in determining the qualification status ofindisidual System Engineers This board will be composed of the System Engineer Supersisor and selected Group Leaders 1.2.
Establish schedule for qualification 1.3.
Establish schedule for Oral Resiew Board I.4.
Perform self-assessment ofeffectiveness ofqualification process 2.
Fully implement Engineering Assurance Group functions. Reviews by Engineering Assurance will be in-line for the j
following engineering products: Safety Evaluations, Operability Evaluations, Technical Specification Clarifications, l
Root Cause Reports, selected design packages, selected material evaluations, LERs, regulatory submittals.
2.1.
Proceduralize Engineering Assurance Group functions 2.2.
Initiate review of selected Engineering Processes (50.59, operability evaluations, and minor mods) and determine changes required prior to restart 23.
Provide interim reports of Engineering product quality for the following Safety Evaluations, Operability Evaluations, License Event Reports (LERs), Responses to Notices of Violations, design changes, and calculations.. (Monthly reports begin at identified completion date).
3.
Use System Functional Performance Review program and Erfr Lig Assurance Group reviews as part of the fundamental tutoring processes for assessing and improsing the technical capabilities of Engineering.
Strategy 4 Acton Plan 4 I 9/16/97 Redsion la Page 48 of 65
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plam Restart Action Ptsu
' 4.
Revise scone of Design Engineering responsibilities to: Maintain design basis (i.e., perform role ofdesign authority)-
Manage r.O review design aethities performed for LaSaBe elsewhere in Comed or by contracted design services. -
Perform all engineering associated with equipment, component and parts replacement for LaSalle including cue-Q grade dedication.
4.1.
Determine detailed scope cfrevised responsibilities for Design Engineering.
4.2.
Determine organizational changes required to Luylergat resised scope ofresponsibilities.
4.3.
Provide Plan for transition to revised Design Engirecing scope without any delay in the support ofrestart activities Include actions to address support of Rapid Response Teams, System Readiness Recostry Teams, and required design work within the restart schedule.
4.4.
Complete transition to revised scope of t%&Iities.
5.
Augment Engineering staff on task or coaching basis, as.yyivpi.te, to compicte reviews and evaluations ofbackig to assist in completion of System Functional Performance Reviews and Design Reviews.
6.
Develop selected supervisors and managers within Espremiug as necessary to achieve necessary narger.ent capability. This may be accomplished via use of Comed or contracted pers-.d.
7.
Perform selfassessment ofeffettiveness of above actions.
Strategy 4 Acuon Plan 4.1 9/16/97 Revision la Page 49 of 65
~ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -
LaSalle County Nuclear Station U it 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan a_g:,
ygp my w
s x
Strategy No: 4
Title:
Engineering Support Sponsor: G. Poletto
==
Description:==
Conduct progrimowtic assessments, and Upgrade engineering capability so that plant problems are identified and those required to be completed prior to unit restart are effectively resolved such that an uneventful restart is achieved and long, uneventful power run is achieved.
i.z m
gj bar f Wx ' ^_$
.m a di ACnOtt PLAN u,
Action Plan No: 4.2
Title:
Plant Operational Readiness
==
Description:==
The functional readiness of some plant systems is uncertain due to configuration discrepancies, open design evaluations and degraded materiel condition.
Objective: Implement a symem functional performance review and other focused assessments ofplant sysems to define work necessary to be completed prior to unit restart so that there is confidence that the system is capable of operating reliably and in accordance with design basis requirements.
Team Memben: 1. G. Poletto
- 2. S. Smith
- 3. M. Lohman 4.
T. Best 5.
A. Javorik
- 6. J. Barron
- 7. L. Guthrie
- 8. J. Pollock
- 9. G. Gibbs G
p mm y
mm.
a-System Functional Performance Review Completion as scheduled j
~
Svstem Readiness Review Walkdown Completion as scheduled System Restoration & Recovery Team Completion of work actisities as scheduled Drawing Upgrade Workoff Curve Completion as scheduled ER WorkoffCurve Completion as scheduled DCP WorkofrCurve Completion as scheduled PIF WorkofTCurve Completion as scheduled Strategy 4 Action Ptan 4.2 9/16/97 Rension la
. age 50 of 65
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description
~._a=
. _ ~ - - ~
~ _.
~. =
-w
~
-~
1.
System Functional Performance Reviews and Functional Testing 1.1.
Determine list of systems imponant to safe and reliable operation of LaSalle.
1.2.
Proceed with System Functional Performance Reviews on all systems selected as imponant to safe and reliable operation; complete functional reviews on a minimum of 15 to 20 of these systems prior to restart. Apply evaluation criteria to ongoing results of roiew to determine possible expansion to full scope of functional resiew prior to restart.
13.
Determine manpower requirements for full scope review.
1.4 Obtain needed manpower and facilities.
1.5.
Identify initial schedule for review 1.6.
Formalize resiew organization.
1.7.
Formalize review, problem reporting and resolutior process, reponing requirmcds, and closure process.
1.8.
Complete review portion for 42 systems in System L'ctiona. Performance Resiews including recomended functional testing requirements.
1.9.
'dentify functional testing requirements including overall integrated testing and selected ECCS response denunm. tion testing. This testing will be directed toward imestigation of known pioblems and confmnation of problem resolution.
This testing will also constitute additional discovery for problems witich cannot be identified sia resiew ofpast documer tation.
1.10.
Implement Joint Test Group process to facilitate test procedure preparation, resiew, implementation and results roiew.
1.11.
Review startup related procedures for adequacy and literal compliance capability.
2.
Design Reviews - As the complement to the System Functional Performance Reviews, certain systems or portions of systems will require a detailed design review to identify and resohc problems. Four systems have been identified to date for this roiew (VE/VC, CSCS,125 VDC).
2.1.
Complete Design Reviews on systems selected during System Functional Performance Reviews Strategy 4 Acnon Ptan 4.2 9/16/97 Revision Ia Page5Ic(65
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plam Restart Action Plan 2.2.
Assess potential extent ofcondition and reach conclusion on safety significance as affects restart; expand resiew, if required, to additional systems or to particular attributes.
3.
Configuration Control Evaluation - Evaluate potential significance ofconfiguration control uncertainty.
3.1.
Determine and review potential modifications under "chron letter process" and evaluate significance l
3.1 I Determine scope of Chron letters to be roiewed.
3.1.2 Perform review and make recommendations.
3.2.
Roiew all "NDITs" for possible design changes; process as design change where determined necessary.
3.3.
Review work package records for LPCS+ 0 Diesel over past five years to assess whether records indicate unauthorized modifications were made.
3.4.
Walk down LPCS & 0 Diesel per isometrics, P& ids, selected electrical and control drawings to confirm design configuration.
3.5.
Walkdown seismic supports on LPCS to confirm detailed design configuration.
3.6.
I.PCS Operational Configuration with the UFSAR.
3.7.
Assess functional testing results in consideration ofpotential unauthorized modifications 3.8.
Review completed IST asscu.rst to determine items needing correction prior to start up 4.
Plant Trips and Transients - Review past plant trips, and important transients and oents. Evaluate assca.rsts that j
have previously been performed for completeness and effectiveness ofcorrective actions in consideration ofcurrent knowledge and approach. Determine whether additional actions are warranted prior to or during restart based on this review.
5.
Vendor Information and Operating Experience Roiews 5.I Review selected vendor information and operating experience files to establish the adequacy of roiew process in consideration of repeated failure to identify potential design problems with SBM control switches. Determine scope of Operating historical vendor information and industry experience that should in reviewed to determine confidence in past practices.
5.2 Perform re.. my of historical vendor information and operating experience for scope defined in Step 5.1.
Strategv 4 Acuon Plan 4.2 9/16/97 Redsion Ia Page 52 of 65
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan 6.
Design Evaluations - Examine outstanding design evaluations and analysis work and determine which work rqsod to be completed before restart (e.g., setpoint calculations).
7.
Important Plant Drawings - Upgrade important plad drawings for systems known to not be accurately depicted and for all systems roiewed as part of System Functiocal Performance Roiew.
7.1.
Operations identify plant drawings for systems reqsug upgrade.
7.2.
System Functional Performance Roiew identify drawings for syvems requiring upgrade before restart 7.3.
Determine schedule to upgrade drawings to support restart.
8.
Backlog Review - Review all backlog items and assess importance for resolution prior to restart (e g, ERs, PIFs/ root cause determinations / corrective actions, Operator Work-Arounds, Control Room Deficiencies, outstanding ARs and Work Requests) against all systems considered important to safe and reliable operation. Use " Restart Review Criteria".
8.1.
Prepare formal Restart Review Criteria for backlogs.
8.2.
Review backlog of Engineering Requests to identify those important to safe and reliable operation and assess timelmess of planned actions to determine whether resolution prior to restart is required.
83.
Review LER's from 1992 to 4/10/97, DVR*s from 1992 and 1993, and Root Cause Reports from 1993 to 4/10/97 to determine ifCorrective Actions were effective. Sample 10% of PIF Corrective Actions for 1993 to present.
8 3.1 Determine scope to be reviewed.
83.2 Perform te iew 8.4.
Review Operator Work-Arounds Control Room deficiencies, outstanding ARs and work requests for those requiring resolution prior to restart.
8.5.
Roiew operability evaluations backlog. Objective: Resoht before startup any operability oWuations fulfiMing restart roiew criteria.
8 6.
Reduce extent ofTechnical Specifications Clarifications to minimum required for restart 8.6.1 Unit I bA2 Unit 2 Strategy 4 Acnon Ptan 4 2 9/16/97 Revision Ia Page 53 of 65
~
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit UUnit 2 Restart Plas Restart Action Plas 8.7.
Develop plan for disposition of non-restart required backlog and roiew applicable procedures and pie to ensure management tools and performance indicators are in place to control backlogs.
9.
System Readiness Review - For all systems important to safe and reliable oposi, perform system readmess roiew present results to Senior Management Roiew.
9.1.
Deve:op criteria for raiew and presentation approach 9.2.
Complete Unit I rniews.
9.3 Complete Unit 2 roiews.
Strategy 4 Actmen Plan 4.2 9/16/97 Rension la Page 54 of65
LaSaMe County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan m
ff d
^
^
M'x d ' STRATEGY h
, ' ' ju [A ys -
Strategy No: 5
Title:
Correcthe Action and Self-Assessment Sponsor: J. Mcdonald
==
Description:==
Conduct programmatic assessments and implement correcthe action program improvements so that plant problems are identified and those required to be completed prior to unit restart are effectively resolved such that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by-
- Improving assessment, and -
- corrective action program implementation 3
JACHON MAN
?
li
~
2 Action Plan No: 5.1
Title:
Corrective Action Program and Assessment j
==
Description:==
Implementation of the corrective action program is not effective in that problem identification, potential negathe trends, and root cause determinations are not consistently effective in identifying the cause of the problem and correcthe actions are not consistently assessed to determine their effectiveness in resohing the problem.
Objective: Identify problems requiring resolution, implement oversight and review ofroot cause determinations and complete improstments to the corrective action screening and post corrective action review process to ensure LCNS personnel are effecthe in identifying and fixing problems that may impact safe unit restart and power operation.
Team Members: 1. B. Riffer
- 2. A. Magnafici
- 3. G. Gibbs 4.
D. Rhoades
- 5. A. Javorik
- 6. S. Smith
- 7. W. Eifert
- 8. S. Shields 4
9 x m Overdue Corrective Action
< 15 / quarter Repeat (SCAQ) Events Less than or equal to 2 / month or Less than 3 Number of PIFs written Trend for 6 months, Problem identification by station personnel is efrectively identifyinst problems before events occur 1
CARB Rejection Rate
< 40%
Strategy 5 Action Plan 5.1 9/16/97 Reusion la Page 55 of 65
. - _ =. _...
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description
~=-
+. = - = ~-
.-~=
~. -
.~
-w.
.i 1.0 Establish t 6 person root cause team at LaSalle Station, answering to CAP Manager.
2.0 Conduct training for the Root Cause Investigators.
3.0 Identify departmental personnel to perform Root Cause Ana!ysis.
4.0 Conduct initial training for the Root Cause Experts 5.0 Conduct management training to increase effectiveness of the oversight ofdwLuental corrective actions.
6.0 Issue clear guidance / communication on the PIF process.
50 Implement a formal NTS Procedure 8.0 Implement the new Nuclear Division Corrective Action NSW7s 9.0 Use System Functional Performance Review process and the associated industry-experienced resources as a tool to I
educate the Engineering organization on the problem threshold that should be reported via PIFs.
16 Use Engineering Assurance Group to increase sensitivity to 10CFR50.72 reportable items identified within Engineering.
I 1.0 Improve the effectiveness of the CARB process 12.0 Implement a formal CARB Procedure.
I 13.1 Clearly establish accountability for CARB process 13.2 Establish indicators for measuring CARB effectiveness 13.3 Identify appropriate qualifications for CARB rruubcis 13.4 Assign members to CARB that meet the requirements of 13.3 above 13.5 Identify required training for CARB members and panide that training
_.. - _... _ _. _.. _ _.. _ _ _ _.. -, _ _ _ _ _.... _ _.. _.. _ _. _ _.. ~
5trategt 5 Achon Ptan 5.1 9/16/97 Rettsson Ia Page 56 of 65 i
LaSalle County NuclearStation Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plan Restart Action Plan
-1i _
O-
- W-d I? 1 ' f n?k f*t:'
4
. % & jdSTRATEGY ^
Strategy No: 5
Title:
Corrective Action and Self-Assessment Sponsor: J. Mcdonald
==
Description:==
Conduct programmatic assessments and implement correcthc action program improstments so that plant problems are identified and those required to be completed prior to unit restart are effectively resohrd such that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This wiU be achieved by:
- Improving assessment, and -
- corrective action program implementation
~
"w 1
oc T
bw ~
. w AC7MINFLAN
+W
[$ w m
.1
_=
Action Plan No: 5.2
Title:
Improve Site Quality Wrification Effectiveness
==
Description:==
Improve SQV's ability to diagnose Nuclear Safety and Quality concerns and effecth efy communicate those assacs to line management for resolution prior to external identification of selfrevealing events.
Objective:
Team Memben: 1. J. McDe- "
2 R. Chrzanowski j
Si Fleusesummece *==amed i,
1d 1 :/
s
' h.. AiMessuse ~
f lh
^"
e t
Consistent identification of safety significam issues based on:
'N/A
- PIFs, CARS. recommendations issued by Quality and Safety Assessment N/A
- Timeliness of PIF. CAR, and NTS Item Closeouts N/A
- Use ofescalation process (NO-9, Corrective Action Record) when N/A appropriate Strategy 5 Acton Plan $_2 9/16/97 Rension Ia Page 57 of 65
~
LcSA County Nuclear Station UK& 1/Utit 2 Restart Pirn Restart Action Plan Action I
Sitp #
Milestone Description
.- > -naw-~~ww - w -nw=.-xn=~-
=-=~~~n.---
--v,~~
vanx-a 1.0 Expectations 1.1.1
- escalating SQV identified issues.
1.1.2
- maintaining independent ervsight.
1.1.3
- oversight activities baseo on high standards.
2.0 Personnel Capabilities 2.1 Assess technical, operational and managerial experience of SQV person,el. Determine permanent or temporary changes in personnel compliment to support assessment station activities.
2.2 StafrSQV group with appropriately qualified personnel based on 2.1.
2.3 Assign functional area responsibility to assessment personnel.
2.4 Improve technical capabilities in audits by improving the utilization of technical spedalists by using shared resource audits, and utility auditor exchanged programs, i.e. JUTS, CMAP
- 3. 5 Reallocate resources to allow response to emerging plant issues.
2.6 Implement internal Lesson Learns process for SQV 3.0 Communications 3.1 Establish monthly meetings between SQV and SVP to discuss SQV monthly report issues and potential actions.
3.2 Set up regularly scheduled meetings to assess plant issues with SVP.
i i
Strategy $
Action Plan 5.2 9/16/97 Revision Ia Page 58 of 65
Ir_S:lle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/Ucit 2 Restart Plas Restart Action Plan 4,5 @ h,.. W, w SIMATEGY !_?
~.* /.... # u..2n #. WF n- ;i u,,N 1
hiin 6
~
M, c @u ".
LL.f,~'?W e?
A w
.h a
-a Strategy No: 5
Title:
Corrective Action and Self-Assessment Sponsor: J. Mcdonald
==
Description:==
Conduct programmatic assessments and implement corrective action program improvements so that plant problems are identified and those required to be completed prior to unit restart are effectively resolved such that unit restart and power operation can be safely achieved and sustained. This will be achieved by-
- Improving assessment, and -
- corrective action program implementation
[$ W '
es,
.A f?" 8;d ^
' FACTION FIANW d ; e f;P m m JR
~
33
"~
Action Plan No: 5 3
Title:
Improve Departmental Self-Assessments and Effectiveness
==
Description:==
Departmental Self-Assessments at e not identifying potential problems prior to the actual problems occurring.
Objective: Performance of Departmental self-assessments to identify problems early in the developmental stages to allow time for corrective actions to be implemented to correct the problems, thereby not having a negative impact on the unit restart and power operations.
Team Members: 1. J. IIackenberg B
W O at w gg.PesforumanceMessmet*
, W+ '
esp -
M " @FesforsmanceStandardu ad Consistent identification ofsafety significant issues based on:
N/A
- Selfidentified PIFs.
N/A
- Timely closure of PIF issues.
N/A Strategy 5 Action Plan 53 9/16/97 Revision Ia Page 59 of 65
llliIIIlii
~,
~
5 3 5 y5 6 g
f e n o a
tal 0 n
r P 6 tS n e n
io g a
t P
cA a
c
=
=
=.
x
=
=.
~
a no
=
it a
a a t
l SP n
=
rt a n
a rl a
e aP s
n l
t c s n a
s u e o t
n n i
NRi n
a tc o
u I
n i
y2A p
t e
n n
h o
t t i
nit r
t is unr c a, t
i r
v a
s oUt e
a e
t R
C/s D =
es 1
e e
. d r
et R n
,. e o
l i
a r o
u t
l t
s S U s
=
s s
e i
i se r
l I
se n
iM n r
id u
a d
e n e r
c f
- o o
r a p tn w
t e
~ n
=. e m
m s
a s
n s e
s s
+x e s
s a
s
~.
f A
le f-s le a
S t
u c
n n
u o
d i
t n
u a o
tS C
u a
n n
no#
ip; 7
a 9
w
/
t e
6 ct 0
0 1
/
w1 2
9 lll l
IsS:lle Couxty Nuclear Stctios Urit 1/Urit 2 Restart PI:n
~.
Restart Action Plan Qgy sqQgge jQ gfyg; GyfgggmmgQ,
_;.ggg
[
ggy %4 gQ Strategy No: 6
Title:
Training Sponsor: D. Sanchez
==
Description:==
Establish a strong focus for personal development by increasing their skill level. This will provide a clean focus on Operational Safety and correcting equipment maintenance issues right the first time. This will be achieved by:
- Improve Operations and Maintenance Performance
- Reducing operator challenges
- Correcting Process se^
i m ?]
I!wn
_ Y sh >ITu MINN *
/ 'W$!N3$ff ' EACTION PLAN ??
W">,_
^
~
Action Plan No: 6.1
Title:
Improve Operator Performance - Operator Training.
==
Description:==
Plant operators do not uniformly possess the knowledge and/or skills necessary to meet and exceed the current LaSalle County Station standards ofoperational excellence.
Objective: Establish operator readiness to support safe unit restart and power operation by implementing a focused operator training program.
1 Team Members: 1 D. Farr
- 2. D. Enright
- 3. L. Blunk 4.
S. Russell
- 5. B. Trafton
- 6. G. Kaegi
>g m>
g-y<,
gy ygg m r;g g g g g
. %g Operation's Event Free Clock 12 mo. and 3 mo. Rolling Average Continuous improvement.
Successful completion by all crews.
A suflicient number oflicensed operators who pass High Intensity Training and who meet management expectations, are available to support shift stafling requirements.
Strategy 6 Action Plan 6. I 9/I6/97 Revision Ia Page 6I of 65 E.
wea
~
LaSalle Cou:ty Nuclear Station
~
Unit 1/Usit 2 Restart Pla:
Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description w, ma -
,ma -- - n..aa -
n~-.=.n=.~=
.n=.-
nun n-8_m nn=~==-=-= =
-w
n n._n
,n l.
Defme Content 1.1 Define Crew Needs and Wants 1.2 Comolete reviews of training materials, feedback, TIFs, observations, etc.
1.3 Complete Reviews of Observations, PIFs, Events, etc.
1 2.
Develop Schedule 3.
Develop the Program 3.1 Establish participation ofindustry peers 3.2 Training (Lesson plans, course materials, labs, other operator input) 3.3 Evaluation / assessment (exams, evaluations, observations, Shift Manager mentors, etc.)
4.
. Implement the Traimng:
- Sufficient number of crews trained to support Unit startup.
5.
Implement operator evaluations Operators identified as pass, short or long term remediation.
6.
Complete HIT following incorporation of feedback and lessons learned 7.
Identify requirements for "Significant Events Training" 8.
Identify requirements for "Startup" training.
9.
Complete training identified in action steps 7 & 8 l
- Suflicient number ofcrews trained to support unit startup.
10.0 Evaluate Training Effectiveness 10.1 Review ofStudent Feedback 10.2 Review of Exam Results Strategy 6 Action Plan 6.1 9/16/97 Revision la Page 62 of 65 c______
llllli i!Ijl
)
^
6 1
5 y6 6 g
f e n o t
a a
l 3
r P 6 tS n e o g i a tc P A
)
ec n
a m
r t
o n
fr e
e m
p e
r g
o a
t n
a a
re m
p n
O o
f i
t o
a n
s s
t o
r i
e r
t s e
o i
a a p
n t l y
e SP n r
s t
rt a s y
a rl u
b e aP d d
l t n
e c s ni t
u e o y p
NRib e
t c
c k c
a y2 A o a
l o
t t
d n
l nit n
o r
t u
n a
is a
oUt e d
v i
d e
e C/s n t
R 1
e e n
et R p e
l i e
s la n d
e r
SU n
p i
a t
s L
e.
lu i(
s e
r tn e
w m
e i
ss v
e e
s r
s s
A se e
n d
ev is i
t t
u c
O fe f
f e
o g
w n
i e
n iv i
a e
r R
T 7
3 9
/
0 6
1 1
1 I
/9 1l l
{
O LcSalle Couzty Nuclear Station Unit 1/Urit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan
,we:[Lg e Aw w sjiy =9mwE g+.. gr@#419messse.1MB5i?
- w~
s s
M3ngt? Q % Qg-Wi@tli;0 PME>c wq$.mim m&w aupww@neg-; Mfg jishs9%. p eggi e
- f-
^ % - M.s 6 095b '._." u g i
. am; ;;:iR WakNfs:@iMQM,
4 4
Strategy No: 7 l
Title:
Process Improvement Sponsor: S. Smith
==
Description:==
Evaluate current process preventing work from being accomplished in a safe, efficient manner.
l}
a,~ 'ACnON PLAN 8%#t%
~ ' ' Rih '
nfie -
@ % i Q M ~ :: Q p ligil d P h p u "
~ ' ~
n u, -
Action Plan No: 7.1
Title:
Procedures
==
Description:==
Streamline the procedure process.
Objective: Improve procedure cycle time.
Team Memben: 1. D. Boone
- 2. G. Heisterman
- 3. D. Farr
- 4. E. Shankle lsMn 9 m e se?
/:Perforamene*MesseMM s og W4 Si h:
se edM Peternaames Ramadande
~ ^ ^;# % -
i N/A N/A l
Strategy 7 Action Plan 7.1 9/16/97 Revision Ia Page 64 of 65
. -- g p
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Unit 1/ Unit 2 Restart Plaa Restart Action Plan Action Step #
Milestone Description n=aa--wu ww=-n
~==n- _ n=a- ~~ n ~-n~auw - - _ n-- --
8.1 Implement NSWP A-04 8.2 Communicate NSWP changes.
8.3 Eliminate LAP-1200-13, revise associated procedures.
8.4 Designate Owner of Safety Evaluation Process 8.5 Eliminate IRG in-line review of procedures 8.6 Go to off-line sampling of a portion ofsafety evaluations by the IRG.
8.7 Evaluate NRC Commitments regarding the IRG, ensure they are met or changed to support the actions above.
8.8 Create a process to resolve disagreement over content of safety evaluations.
8.9 Develop a list of exempt procedures that do not require safety evaluation.
8.10 Eliminate duplication of Onsite Review and PORC requirements.
8.11 Develop means for accessing Downers Grove SAR database.
8.12 Assign owners in workgroups for procedures to walkdown and validate procedures.
8.13 Develop PCR backlog workdown curve by procedure.
8.14 Track productivity by procedure writer.
8.15 Establish a combined procedures group.
8.16 Assign dedicated WPTs to Procedures Group 8.17 Implement " mind to screen" process to gain word processing efficiency.
8.18 Complete training on NOD Writer's Guide 8.19 Present automated procedure process to SMRC for approval.
8.20 Monitor procedure cycle time and track time at each part ofprocess.
Strategy 7 Action Plan 7.1 9/16/97 Revision Ia Page 65 of 65
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.