ML20216G947

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 970903 Meeting W/Sargent & Lundy & Northeast Nuclear Energy Co Re Status & Results of S&L Efforts in Conducting Millstone Unit 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program.List of Attendees & Handouts Encl
ML20216G947
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/08/1997
From: John Nakoski
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
References
NUDOCS 9709160096
Download: ML20216G947 (16)
v • d • e


Text

- _.

Seprernber 8,1997 LICENSEE:

NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY (NNECO) i FACILITY:

Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 i

SUBJECT; SEPTEMBER 3,1997, MEETING WITH SARGENT & LUNDY LLC AND NORTHEAST UTILITIES REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE MILLSTONE UNIT 3 INDEPENDENT CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM On September 3,1997, the Special Project Office (SPO) staff of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) met with representatives from Sargent & Lundy (S&L) and Northeast Utilities (NU)in a publicly observed meeting. The meeting was held to discuss the status and results of S&L's efforts in conducting the Millstone Unit 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP),

i S&L indicated that by the end of September 1997, it plans to complete the identification of discrepant conditions (discover / phase) for the ICAVP Tier 1 review of the first group of systems, the Tier 2 accident mitigation system review, and the Tier 3 change processes review.

The discovery phase for the Tier i reviews for the second set of systems is scheduled to be completed by the end of October 1997. S&L plans to issue its final report by the end of November 1997. During the meeting S&L requested that the NU responses to the requests for Information associated with the Tier 3 review be given top priority to support completing the discovery phase for Tier 3 by the end of September 1997.

NU questioned S&L on applying lessons learned from the first group of ICAVP Tier 1 systems to the second group. S&L Indicated that wherever possible it was applying the lessons learned.

NU also quectioned the focus of the review of calculations for the Tier 1 systems. The SPO staff indicated that the Tier 1 calculational reviews were required, but that sampling methodologies could be proposed by the ICAVP contractors for NRC approval. S&L has submitted a sampling methodology for the review of repetitive pipe support and pipe stress calculations that the NRC SPO staff has approved.

A list of attendees is provided in Enclosure 1. Enclosure 2 provides the handout used by S&L during the meeting.

/g/

John A. Nr koski, ICAVP Program Coordinator a

ICAVP Oversight Branch Special Projects Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-423

Enclosures:

As Stated cc w/encls: See next page Q1SIBlBUTION:

HARD COPY Docket Files (50-423) SPO reading Elmbro OGC N M o b. // e PUBLIC:

JDurr, RI SReynolds RPerch ACRS E-Mall w/enci ionly 7)fy SCollins WTravers PMcKee WDean FMiraglia JAndersen

~ LBerry DRose 7;2,g, DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\NAKOSKl\\MEETSUM\\TRIPRPT.012 I

g v.

...em w. - w.,n,w.v.em m er.cm.am.w.e v.=em OFFICE ICAVP/SPO.

E ICAVP/SPO E

NAME JANakoski M SReynolds At_

DATE 9/ I / 97 9 / 9 / 97 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9709160096 970900 i

POR ADOCK 05000423 P

PDR

Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 Cc:

Lillian M. Cuoco. Esquire Mr. F. C. Rothen Senior Nuclear Counsel Vice President Nuclear Work Services Northeast Utilities Service Company Northeast Nuclear Energy Company P. O. Box 270 P.O. Box 128 Hartford, CT 061410270 Waterford, CT 06385 Mr. Kevin T. A. McCarthy, Director Charles Brinkman, Manager Monitodng and Radiation Division Washington Nuclear Operations Depailment of Environmental ABB Combustion Engineering l

Protection 12300 Twinbrook Pkwy, Suite 330 79 Elm Street Rockville, MD 20852 Hartford, CT 06106 5127 Mr. D. M. Goebel Mr. Allan Johanson, Assistant Director Vice President Nuclear Oversight Office of Policy and Management Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Policy Development and Planning P. O. Box 128 Division Waterford, CT 06385 1

450 Capitol Avenue MS 52ERN P. O. Box 341441 Mr. M. L Bowling, Jr.

Hartford, CT 061341441 Mil' stone Unit No. 2 Nuclear Recovery Officer Regional Administrator, Region l Northeast Nuclear Energy Company U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 128 475 Allendale Road Waterford, CT 06385 King of Prussia, PA 19406 Senior Resident Inspector First Selectmen Millstone Nuclear Power Station Town of Waterford clo U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Hall of Records P. O. Box 513 200 Boston Post Road Niantic, CT 06357 Waterford, CT 06385 Mr. J. K. Thayer Deborah Katz, President Recovery Officer Nuclear Citizens Awareness Network Engineering and Support P. O. Box 83 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Shelburne Falls, MA 03170 P. O. Box 128 Waterford, CT 06385 Mr. Wayne D. Lanning Deputy Director of Inspections Mr. M. H. Brothers Special Projects Office-Vice President Millstone UrJt 3 475 Allendale Road Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Khg of Prussia, PA 19406 1415 _

P. O. Box 128 Waterford, CT 06385

.. -(

t i

Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Mdistone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 p

cc:

i Burlington Electric Department Ms. P. Loftus 1

clo Robert E. Fletcher, Esq.

Director Regulatory Affairs for l

271 South Union Street Millstone Station Burlington, VT 05402 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company i

P. O. Box 128 Mr. M. R, Scully, Executive Director Waterford, CT 06385 Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative Mr. N. S. Cams 30 Stott Avenue Senior Vice President and Nonvich, CT 06360 Chief Nuclear Officer Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Mr. William D. Meinert P. O. Box 128 Nuclear Engineer Waterford, CT 06385 i

Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale

- Electric Company Mr. Don K. Schopfer P. O. Box 426 -

Vice President and ICAVP Manager Ludlow, MA 01056 Sargent & Lundy LLC 55 East Monroe Street Ernest C. Hadley, Esq.

Chicago, IL 60003 5780 1040 B Main Street P. O. Box 54g Mr. Daniel L. Curry West Wareham, MA 02576 Project Director Millstone Project Joseph R. Egan, Esq.

Parsons Power Group Inc.

Egan & Associates P.C.

2675 Morgantown Road 2300 N Street, NW Reading. PA 19607 Washington, D.C. 20037

'h Citizens Regulatory Commission ATTN: Ms. Susan Perry Luxton 180 Great Neck Road j

Waterford, Connecticut 06385 The Honorable Terry Concannon Co-Chair Nuclear Energy Advisory Council Room 4035 Legislative Office Building Capitol Avenue o

Hartford, Connecticut 06106 Mr. Evan Woollacott

- Co-Chair Nuclear Energy Advisory Council 128 Terrys Plain Road Simsbury, CT 06070 -

LIST OF ATTENDEES September 3,1997 NAME ORGANIZATION POslTION Wdliam Travers NRC Director, Special Projects Office (SPO), NRR Eugene Imbro NRC Deputy Director, ICAVP Oversight, SPO, NRR John Nakoski NRC ICAVP Oversight Program Coordinator, SPO, NRR Don Schopfer Sargent & Lundy Verification Team Manager Marty Bowling NU MP2 Unit Officer Raymond Necci NU Director, CMP Patricia Loftus NU Director, Regulatory Affairs Joe Fougere NU Manager, ICAVP Richard T. Laudent NU ICAVP Project Director

I l

i MILLSTONE UNIT 3 INDEPENDENT CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFICATIC>N PROGRAM STATUS REVIEW MEETING l

SEPTEMBER 3,1997 l

A-i Enclosure 2

l

MILLSTONE UNIT 3 INDEPENDENT CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFICATION PROGRAM STATUS REVIEW MEETING SEPTEMBER 3,1997 Aj Pro. ect Team

=

l I

..........................................)

l I

I I

Si l

Tf T?

l Tf l

'~

=

l

^

f --

l

.. - - -, ~ - -

i Tier 1 System Grouping SWP. Service Water OSS / RSS Quench Spray

+

. Recirculation Spray

. Refueling Water Storage Tank HVX Auxiliary Building HVAC

+

. Supplemental Leakage Collection & Release

. Emerge 1cy Diesel Generator Room Ventilation DGX Emergency Diesel Engine and Generator a

. EDG Exhaust & Misc. Instrumentation

. EDG Lubricating Oil System

. EDG Fuel Oil System

. EDG Starting Air System

. EDG Sequencer 4160 Volt Electrical Distribution System 4

~^

M Tier 1 - System Review Status SWP QSS/RSS

_.. - _. ~. _ _

Pop. Comp ' Pop.

Comp System Boundary Definitkt.

N/A ' ' 100% ' N/A ~

100% ~

Document Gathering (RFis)

N/A ' 100% ~ N/A ~ ~! 100% ~

Screen NU CMP Findings--~N/A~ ~100%~N/A'~ ~100%~

Identify Syste~mT4uire.

593~~~100%71372~~ 100%~

Calculation Reviews ~~~T491~l~41%~]~485-

~~ 50%~

Component Reviews 1562 7 29% 7 1657~ 15%'~

'Diawirip ReVieisii 171 57%, 199~74%~

Topical Reviews ~ ~

2 0%

'2 0%' ~

Disposition System RequireT"" 593~~ 0%'~~ 1372~ ~ 0%~

Mod Reviews 83 ~ '0W "9~

~

+

.*7.,

~

I Tier 1 - System Review Status HVX DGX

._ _,j. _

Pop. Comp Pop.

Comp Spitshi B6ii6d5iVDefi6ition N/A 100%~~ N/A7~100%~

'Do6UTnint Gathering ~(RFis)-~~ N/A~~ ~ 100%~ ~ N/A'~~ 100%~

Scre6n NU CMP Findings N/A-~ 100%~ ~ N/A~~~100%~

' identify System Require.

700 10%

700 20%~

Culculation Reviews' ~

378

' 1%

~675~

1%'

1 Component Reviews 1723

~ 0% ~ 1040 8%

1 Drawing Reviews 295 0%

330 0%

Rb'M--~~ ~~~~~ F ~ K'~ ~~'~ FE~

Disposition System Req 0lre.

~700 ~ '0% " 700 0%

R M - ~ '

~~'~'~~26"

~ 0%

~58 Q ( 1

.x Tier 1 - Physical Configuration Review Status SWP QSS/RSS Pop. Comp Pop. iComp Scope Walaknvn Boundary 1956 75W 2152^ 38%

Dwgs Re6line Wilkdown Dwgs '

' 628~ ~85%~~490~ ' '54%~

'Ph9sifi C*gTevieWVs.~

761-~~~57%~966-~~61%~

i r

Upper p p;g l

i F6nctional Walkdowns~

'~1198~ 70%~1090~~58%~

(No. of Dwgs)

.dodification Walkdowns~ -~~83' 0%'

9 ' ' ' ' 0%'

..(No. of Mods)

i Tier 1 - Physical Configuration Review Statuo HVX DGX

-. _.,j _.

_7._.,

Pop. ~ Comp Comp! Camp S66pe WalkdoffriB666dsry~ ~1357 ~~0%~~~1150T 2%-

Dwgs Redline Walkdown Dwgs'~

~135 ~ '0%~ ~~331~ ~2%

Physical Dwg Review vs.

450 0%

355 0%

1 Upper Tier Dwgs j

F'unctional Walkdowns ~~~~517'~ 0%~ 593' 0%~

(No.of Dwgs)

Modification Walkdowns 26 0%

58 0%

~~(No.of Mods) em +m +

Tier 1 - O&M & Testing Review Status SWP QSS/RSS

=

y _,j,....

.,7 Pop. Comp Pop, i Comp System Boundary Definition N/A 100% ' 'N/A 100%

Document Gbtherin~g~(RFis)

N/A-~~95%

N/A-~ 95%-~

Screen NU CMP Findings N/A~ 100%~ N/A 7100%

Identify System Re~qUlre'

82 ~~~ 95%7~165}'93%~

OPS /Maint/TesMgrTrainin~g 139-~3%~7157 -t ~3% ~

Procedure Reviews

~

Disp 6sitiofiSpstein Recidire.

82 0%

165-~0%~~

Mod Reviews ~ ~~

~~

'83 0%

~9~l ~%~

0 w

r

l. -

l l

l

Tier 1 - O&M & Testing Review Status HVX DGX

~~ Total

" Total { Comp

%~

Pop.. Comp Pop.-

System Boundary Definition' N/A' 100% ~ N/A ^ 100%

Document Gathering (RFis)

N/A' 75 %

N/A' " 75%

~ Screen NU CMP Findings N/A 85W~~ N/K~[85%~

Identify System Require '

78 55%

90 l 47%

OPS /Maint/ Testing / Training 117 0%

398 l 0%

Procedure Reviews Disposition System Require.

78 0%

90 I 0%

. Mod Revieh~" ~~ ~

~ 28 0%

' 58 ~~i 0%

~

p Tier 2 - Accident Mitigation Review 217 critical characteristics to be verified 86 complete

  • 87 reviewin progress 27 review not yet started 17 review being done by SRG r

9-

P Tier 3 - Programmatic Review Scope

  • Current change process review-Complete
  • Current change implementation reviews - NS
  • CMP corrective action review-in process
  • Past change reviews -In process

}

P 4-t Tier 3 - Programmatic Review Status

.I Current Change Process implementation e

  • Prepared 11 process implementation checklists
  • Review to start week of 9-8-97 NRC concurrence on checklists complete

'l gab y

.v-,--

w.,

l *.

Tier 3 - Programmatic Review Status Conective Action Reviews URs i ACR/CRs

_,7

_,j -_

SWP Pop. !Conp; Pop. Cony

_. 210 l 80% 1 78 75 %

~75%i ~ 54~~75W DGX

~

339 l 60% ' 23960%

Sanple of othersystems TBD l 0% ; TBD 0%

g

~~

M..v 9

Tier 3 - Programmatic Review Status PastChangeReviews

Sanple Docs Docs Stae.-. ! Onderect Roosived. -..

l

~TerquayAta i

25 822 m

~

ViidiMnds l

10 6 11 829

~Uksdr-lM%iEE~

16 6 13 m

~SeWrts 40

& 14 m

DQt 32 613 827 T5FLDetemidus l

16

& 11 829

%Gadedid bms 16 6 11 825 4

__.a.._..

sedEUdRprsadRprrrts

~[

10

[

,n Ob gem

L Discrepancy Summary 147 DRs initiated 58 Valid DRs issued to NRC/NU/NEAC

  • 9 DRs considered invalid 80 DRs in process 6 Resolutions ceceived from NU

. S&L review of NU resolutions in process 54 DRs on Internet as of 7 PM EDT 9-2-97 Discrepancy Summary NRC Significance Level for the 58 Issued DRs 0 Level 1 0 Level 2 19 Level 3 39 Level 4

+

~

~

4 m

  • 4

~

.-w--

e

.~

Northeast Utilities - Millstone Unit 3

  • 0W ICAVP Milestone Schedule ID Task Name Start Finish April l

Mg l

June l

July l August j September l Octolper l 9eowsmtpor 1

Sutrrst Urst 3 Audit Plan to NRC for approsal 3/17/97 3/1767 i

l 2

NRC Anasze approval of MJ selecnon 4/TS7 4/767 3

Obtain nornystem specfic Urit 3 documents 4/17S7 5/14/97 j

4 NRC Approve Unit 3 Aud t Plan 4/29/97 5/1697 i

5 Mobuize and Train Projed Team 5/12S7 5/23S7 I

l l

I 6

NU w. Au CMP on Wave 1 systems 5/27/97 5/27/97 h5/27 j

7 NRC Select erst 2 Unit 3 systems 5/27/97 5/28S7 l

l I

g 8

Obtain system speonc docs for first 2 syst.

5/29/97 7/24S 7 9

Meenng w/ NU, NRC on 1st 2 syst boundaries 6/19f97 6/19/97 i

l 4'

to Perform Tier 2 and Tier 3 Reviews 5/27S 7 9/26/97 l

i 11 Perform Tier 1 Reviews on first 2 6/12S7 9/26/97 1

12 NU completes CMP on Wave 2 & 3 systems 7/16/97 7/16/97 l

7/16 13 NRC / NEAC Select remaining Unit 3 systems 7/17S7 7/17/97

{

g*

14 Obtain system spedfic does for remaining syst.

7/18S7 8/21/97 i

l 15 Meetog w/ NU, NRC on rem. syst boundaries 8/13/97 8/13/97 I

16 Perform Tier 1 Review on remaming systems 7/18/97 10/24/97 I

17 Process and Report Unit 3 Findings 7/3/97 10/3167 18 NU Provide Proposed Resdution to findings 7/23/97 11/7S 7 E-19 Review NU Proposed Resdubon to findings 8/8/97 11/14/97 20 Prepare Unit 3 Final Report 10/27/97 11/21/97 f

j j

i 1

C?.NtfJCAVPGCHED\\MILESS18.MPP Pay 1

Northeast Utilities - Millstone Unit 3 Saro'at " undr 9/3/97 i

Independent Corrective Action Verification Program Percent Complete Basis Subtask Aug 97 Task / Subtask Description

% of Task % of Total % Compl.

Development of Project Manual 3.4%

100.0 %

Project Administration 1.9%

80.0 %

Development of Electronic Communications 0.3%

90.0 %

Development of Web Site & S&L Databases 1.2%

75.0 %

Training and Mobilization 4.1%

100.0 %

ARG Perform Reviews / Report DRs 6.2%

ID of Crit. Charact.

30% 1.9 %

100.0 %

Verification of Crit. Charact.

70 % 4.3 %

65.0 %

CRG Perform Reviews / Report DRs 11.3 %

System SWP 42% 4.7 %

58.0 %

System OSS/RSS 25% 2.8 %

46.0 %

System HVX 18 % 2.0 %

0.0%

System DGX 15% 1.7 %

2.0%

ORG - Perform Reviews / Report DRs 9.0%

System - SWP 25% 2.3 %

40.0%

System OSS/RSS 25% 2.3 %

40.0%

System - HVX 25 % 2.3 %

15.0 %

System DGX 25% 2.3 %

15.0 %

PRG Perform Reviews / Report DRs 3.9%

Corrective Action Review 45% 1.8 %

75.0 %

Process Review 20% 0.8 %

100.0 %

Process implement. Review 10 % 0.4 %

0.0%

Past Change Review 25% 1.0 %

10.0 %

SRG Perform Reviews / Report DRs 50.7 %

System - SWP 26% 13.2 %

49.0 %

System OSS/RSS 22 % 11.2 %

61.0 %

System - HVX 22 % 11.2 %

17.0 %

System DGX 30 % 15.2 %

19.0 %

IRC Review of DRs and NU Resolutions 1.0%

45.0%

Evaluate NU Resolution of DRs 2.7%

1.0%

Final Report 1.4%

0.0%

Document Receipt and Maintenance 2.8%

60.0 %

100.0 %

TOTAL PROJECT 43.9 %

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20216G947&oldid=3968728"