ML20216F104
| ML20216F104 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/21/1997 |
| From: | Dicus G NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Hoyle J NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20216F083 | List: |
| References | |
| SECY-97-144-C, NUDOCS 9709110165 | |
| Download: ML20216F104 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _.
, ~
NOT ATION VOT E RESPONSE SHEET TO:
John C. Hoyle, Secretary FROM:
COMMISSIONER DICUS
SUBJECT:
SECY-97-144 - POTENTIAL POLICY ISSUES RAISED BY NON-OWNER-OPERATORS Approved X
Discpproved Abstain Not Participating Request Discussion COMMENTS:
- Attached,
(
(h!! k
..),,,
[
StGNATURE. ) J Release Vote /
/
~
- e. L.
?/
,//)
DATE
/
Withhold Vote /
/
Entered on "AS" Yes x
No NR" CO CORRESPONDENCE PDR
<WO WOlG5 QP/I.)
a l
Comments on SECY 97144. " Potential Policy issues Raised by Non-Owner Operators" I concur with the staff's position as outlined in SECY-97-144. However, given that NMSS has license (or certificate) transfer responsibility in several areas [c.g.,10 CFR 40.46,61.30,70.36,72.50,76.65 (certificate), and 110.50(b)(5)], the staff should ensure coordination between offices on this topic.
NMSS may have some unique observations in this area since it has certified USEC.
which relies on contractors to operate its Gaseous Diffusion Plants. Moreover, since regulation of the DOE is under consideration and since DOE uses contractors to manage and operate its facilities, a non licensee operator is a possibility and may need to be addressed. NMSS involvement with DOE on Part 72 activities may yield additionalinsights in this regard. This experience may be useful to NRR; alternatively, NMSS may benefit from NRR's experience.
Criteria that may have been developed by both the NRR and NMSS offices should be shared to ensure a consistent agency approach. To the degree that the Standard Review Plan can state specific criteria, it should.
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _