ML20216E787

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-334/98-80 & 50-412/98-80 on 980105-0212 & Notice of Violation.Insp Included Evaluation of 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluation Program for Preparing SE Relating to Changes,Tests or Experiments at Plant
ML20216E787
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 03/09/1998
From: Wiggins J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Cross J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML20216E791 List:
References
50-334-98-80, 50-412-98-80, EA-98-072, EA-98-120, EA-98-121, EA-98-72, NUDOCS 9803180158
Download: ML20216E787 (5)


See also: IR 05000334/1998080

Text

9, . ..

,

. .

.,

l A

I

March 9, 1998

EA No. 98-72

EA No.98-120

f EA No.98-121

!

Mr. J. E. Cross

President

. Generation Group

Duquesne Light Company (DLC)

Post Office Box 4

Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-334/98-80,50-412/98-80,

NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION

Dear Mr. Cross:

, This refers to the NRC Engineering Team inspection that was conducted at the Beaver

l Valley Power Station from January 5 through February 12,1998. The overall objective of

l the inspection was to determine whether engineering was providing support for safe plant

operations. This inspection included evaluation of the 10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluation

program for preparing safety evaluations relating tc changes, tests or experiments at the

plant.

On January 23,1998, Mr. Kaufman discussed the preliminary findings with you and other

members of your staff. At the conclusion of the inspection on February 12,1998, Mr.

' Kaufman discussed additional findings with Messrs. Sushil Jain and Dick'Brandt of your

staff at the site.

The inspectors judged that Duquesne Light Company (DLC) demonstrated a conservative

safety perspective when DLC decided to taka Unit 1 from hot shutdown to cold shutdown

on January 4,1998, to conduct further applicability engineering reviews to determine if an

identified Unit 2 nonconforming condition related to Westinghouse 7300 series circuit

cards also existed in Unit 1. Further, the inspectors concluded that your engineering staff

was providing timely support for emergent technical issues and was generally effective in

supporting safe plant operations. This inspection also determined that the 50.59 safoty

evaluation program was being implemented satisfactorily. However, while this inspection

found no specific problems regarding the prioritization of engineering work items, other

than for a residual heat removal (RHR) flow control valve, the inspectors noted that work

i. backlogs increased in many areas in 1997.

\

k

9903190159 99030934 i

PDR ADOCK O '

G

, k

<

i

  • > - *

,

.

., .-

Mr. J.~ E. Cross 2

!

The inspectors also identified that violations of NRC requirements occurred. These

violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice) and the circumstances

surrounding them are described in detail in the subject inspection report. The violations {

involved untimely corrective actions for a RHR valve and inadequate safety evaluations in

December 1997 for an operational procedure change associated with the RHR valve

problem and in December 1994 for a modification to the auxiliary intake structure.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the

t enclosed Notice when preparing your response. The NRC will use your response, in part,

' to determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with

regulatory requirements.

I

Additionally, the NRC team reviewed your self-identified issue involving an old design -

l deficiency associated with Westinghouse 7300 circuit cards which failed to meet IEEE- 279-1971 design separation requirements. The issue was identified by your engineering

staff through voluntary initiatives. The NRC considers your initiatives to identify

longstanding design issues noteworthy. Corrective actions taken and planned were

'

comprehensive and should prevent recurrence. The design deficiency was subtle in nature

and was not likely to be identified by routine surveillance or quality assurance activities.

The old design issue apparently stemmed from an inadequate initial design review, r id was

a violation of NRC requirements which could be considered for escalated enforcerr. iit and

subject to a civil penalty. However, after consultation with the Director, Office of

Enforcement, and the Regional Administrator, I have been authorized to not issue a Notice  !

l of Violation and not propose a civil penalty in this case in accordance with the provisions l

l, provided in Section Vll.B.3 of the NRC's Enforcement Policy. This decision.was made after

consideration that: (1) the violation was identified by your staff's good questioning '

attitudes during voluntary initiatives; (2) corrective actions, both taken and planned, were

comprehensive and timely; (3) the condition was subtle in nature and not likely to be

disclosed through routine surveillance or quality assurance activities; and (4) the violation

was not reasonably linked to current performance. The exercise of discretion ,

acknowledges your good effort to identify and correct subtle violations, that would not be  !

identified by routine efforts, before the degraded safety systems are called upon.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter,  !

its enclosures, and your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR). l

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact the team leader

Mr. Paul Kaufman at (610) 337-5082.

!

,

S *

.

Mr. J. E. Cross 3

l _ We appreciate your cooperation.

l'

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

James T. Wiggins, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

l

Docket Nos.: 50-334, 50-412

i License Nos: DRP-66, NPF-73

l Enclosures: Inspection Report 50-334/98-80 and 50-412/98-80

L w/ Notice of Violation

cc w/encis:

S. Jain, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Services

D. Brandt, Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group and Plant Manager

W. Kline, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department

B. Tuite, General Manager, Nuclear Operations Unit

M. Pergar, Acting Manager, Quality Services Unit

J. Arias, Director, Safety & Licensing Department

i J. MacDonald, Manager, System and Performance Engineering

M. Clancy, Mayor

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

State of Ohio

State of West Virginia

l

l

__-__

l

9, . .

!

.

.

,.

Mr. J. E. Cross 4

Distribution w/encis:

Region i Docket Room (with concurrences)

PUBLIC

Nuclear Safety information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident inspector

H. Miller, RA/W. Axelson, DRA (irs)

J. Wiggins, DRS

L. Nicholson, DRS

P. Kaufman, DRP

B. Boger, ADPR, NRR

J. Goldberg, OGC

J. Lieberman, OE (OEMAIL)

, D. Holody, EO, RI

T. Walker, SES

N. Perry, DRP

D. Haverkamp, DRP

A. Linde, DRP

DRS File

Distribution w/enci (VIA E-MAIL):

J. Stolz, PDI-2, NRR

D. Brinkman, PM, PDI-2, NRR

B. McCabe, OEDO

DOCDESK

Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

.1

2

DOCUMENT NAME: A:BV98080. INS

To seeelve a copy of this f- nadicate in $a boa: 'C' = Copy without ettschment/ enclosure 'E' = Copy with attachment / enclosure

  • N* = No copy

OFFICE Rl/DRS .

, ,

Rl/DRS l, Rl/DRP l// Rl/DRS

NAME PKauftnan~ J/ GMeyer / ., _/ NPerry y44~ J Wiggins

-

DATE 03k}/9Q ' ) \M 03/4//98 'f P 03/4798 03//98

OFF CIAL HECORD COPY '

.

..

__________

I

,

, .

.

.-

Mr. J. E. Cross 4

Distribution w/encls:

Region i Docket Room (with concurrences)

PUBLIC

Nuclear Safety information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident inspector

H. Miller, RA/W. Axelson, DRA (irs) l

J. Wiggins, DRS

l

L. Nicholson, DRS '

P. Kaufman, DRP

B. Boger, ADPR, NRR

J. Goldberg, OGC

J. Lieberman, OE (OE*J c)

D. Holody, EO, RI l

'

T. Walker, SES

N. Perry, DRP

D. Haverkamp, DRP

A. Linde, DRP l

DRS File

Distribution w/enci (VIA E-MAIL):

J. Stolz, PDI-2, NRR

D. Brinkman, PM, PDI-2, NRR

B. McCabe, OEDO

DOCDESK

Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

i

!

l

l

1

DOCUMENT NAME: a:\bv98080. ins

Ts receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure *E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure "N" = No

copy

OFFICE RI:DRS l RI:DRS l RI:DRP l Rl: ORA l Al:DRS ,l l

NAME PKaufman* GMeyer* NPerry* TWalket JWiggins@/

DATE 03/05/98 03/ /98 03/ /98 03/6 N8 03/q/98 U

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

'See Previous Concurrence Copy

I

l

i

i

fel