ML20216D549
| ML20216D549 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/24/1987 |
| From: | Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | NEW ENGLAND COALITION ON NUCLEAR POLLUTION, NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| References | |
| CON-#287-3882 OL-1, NUDOCS 8706300549 | |
| Download: ML20216D549 (2) | |
Text
vg
[]g/&
Janur'r
'htW
. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION
'87 J&l 25 A10:15 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD GFri ^
Administrative Judges:
DOCsry/afgp-,., j ; {=
c Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman June 24, 1987 Gary J. Edles Howard A. Wilber SERVD) JUN 2 51987
)
In the Matter of
.)
)
.i PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF-
)
Docket Nos. 50-443-OL-1:
.NEW HAMPSHIRE, ET AL.
)
50-444-OL-1 i
)
(Seabrook Station, Units 1
)
(Onsite' Emergency Planning and 2)
)
and Safety Issues)
)
'i ORDER Oral argument on the'pending appeals.from the Licensing Board's March 25, 1987 partial initial decision in the onsite energency planning and safety issues phase of this operating license proceeding involving the Seabrook nuclear-facility will be heard at 9:30 a.m. on' Friday, July 24',
'1987, in Courtroom No.
2, United States District Court for
~
the District of New Hampshire, 55 Pleasant Street, Concord, New Hampshire.
Each side will be. permitted ninety minutes for the presentation of its argument, to be' divided among the parties on that side pursuant to their prior agreement'1 l
i I Notices of appeal 1and supporting briefs were filed'by the' Attorney General of Massachusetts on behalf ofLthat Commonwealth, the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League 1(SAPL),J and the New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution.
A fourth, intervenor,'the Town of Hampton,'New Hampshire, also-noted:
l (Footnote Continued).
....0706300549 870624
'1/
PDR ADOCK 05000443 g
'{
4 2
l i
l In preparing for argument, every participant should further confer with counsel for the other party or parties on the same side in the interest of avoiding unnecessary repetition of identical points.
By. letter mailed no later than July 15, 1987, each party shall provide the Secretary to this Board with the
)
name of the person who will present argument on its behalf.
The letters of the Attorney General of Massachusetts and the NRC staff shall also include a statement of the division of
)
time agreed upon by count.el on their respective sides of the
-l argument.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD
_k J
w C. J@n Shoemaker Secretary to the Appeal Board (Footnote Continued) an appeal but did not file a supporting brief.
In a May 5, 1987 submission in connection with its application for.a stay of the effectiveness of the March 25 partial ~ initial-decision (at 2), Hampton "relie{d] upon and. incorporate [d]
by reference" the appellate briefs of the. Attorney General and SAPL "[b]y way. of further support for [the stay]
request."
We do not regard that action as a' satisfactory substitute for a brief in support of the Hampton appeal from the decision.
Hampton may nonetheless participate in the oral argument if, but only if, the other three appellants agree to provide it with a portion of the time allotted to their side.
The applicants and the NRC staff are defending the partial initial decision and therefore constitute the other side of the argument.
- -