ML20216D193
| ML20216D193 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 09/05/1997 |
| From: | Hughey W ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| GNRO-97-00086, GNRO-97-86, NUDOCS 9709090242 | |
| Download: ML20216D193 (15) | |
Text
1
. [. l
[17h e
{OfOV Entergy operations, Inc.
PO Box 756 Pc<t Goxn.AS 39150 T01601437 fA70
~
W.K.Hughey Sawy a % patsy September 5. 1997 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Station P1-37 Washington, D.C. 20555 Attention:
Document Control Desk
Subject:
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-416 License No. NPF-29 AdditionalInformation Requested During a Meeting With NRC July 10,1997 Related to Emergency Plan Change 28-001-95
References:
GNRI 97/00057 dated April 24,1997 from NRC to EOi, Emergency Plan Change, Revision 28-001-95, For Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 GNRI-97/00098 dated July 17,1997 from NRC to EOl, Meeting on Emergency Plan Change, Revision 28-001-95, For Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1 GNRO-97/00086 Gentlemen:
We appreciated the opportunity to discuss Emergency Plan Change 28.001-95 during the meeting we had with the staff on July 10,1997. We were also pleased to note in the NRC letter dated July 17,1997 the staff's position that we had adequately addressed the issues noted in the NRC's Safety Evaluation (December 11,1996). We also agree with the staff that our actual onshift staffing versus Emergency Plan Table 5-1 staffing levels may, in some instances, be a I,
point of confusion. As requested, we are supplying additionalinformation on how Table 5-1 of the Emergency Plan is implemented (Attachments 2 and 3). Theg\\h information contained in these attachments provides the result of a detailed review of how Emergency Plan Table 5-1 staff;ng levels are actually implemented and a comparison of actual staffing levels versus Table 5-1 requirements.
l
\\
9709090242 970905 tlllfultihlililll&lllici milli llRllE Illlilllll Ill Dl' HjlIll PDR ADOCK 05000416 i
F PDR
- l 3
4 GNRO-97/00086 Page 2 of 5 During the detailed review of Table 5-1 of the Emergency Plan, we did determine that there are some inconsistencies between what Table 5-1 implies and what is implemented in our procedures. We found four examples where individuals were assigned dual tasks although strict interpretation of Table 5-1 indicates that dediccted personnel are provided for each task. Attachment 1 provides deta!!s of these inconsistencies, a believe these inconsistencies resulted from our focusing on performance of the Emergency Plan tasks versus strict compliance (i.e., head count) with Table 5-1 of the Emergency Plan. We agree that the examples noted in Attachment 1 represent cases where Emergency Plan changes should have been initiated prior to changing implementing procedures. It should be noted that the changes to the implementing procedures which resulted in these inconsistencies were informally discussed and reviewed with NRC personnel. This may have also contributed to our focusing on performance of the tasks rather than following well established processes for maintaining procedures consistent with the Emergency Plan. Nevertheless, knowing the importance of maintaining compliance with our Emergency Plan it is our expectation that changes to Emergency Plan implementing procedures not be made without first making appropriate changes to the Emergency Plan.
In each example given in Attachment 1, we believe the consequences of the changes were minimal since there was no impact on our ability to perform the tasks called for in our Emergency Plan. It is important to note that examples in only deal with selected 30 minute responders. Onshift and 60 minute responder staffing was not affected. In fact, Table 5-1 onshift and 60 minute responder functions have always been overstaffed (see Attachment 2) thus further lessening the consequences of these inconsistencies. Therefore, we do not believe there has ever been any impact on our ability to provide timely notifications to the public nor has our ability to adequately protect the public health and safety ever been degraded.
in order to address inconsistericies between our Emergency Plan and implementing procedures we are currently instituting compensatory measures to ensure strict compliance with our currently approved Emergency Plan. These compensatory measures include identifying and designating additional 30 minute responders if required, or reassigning individuals as 30 minute responders if appropriate. For individuals currently serving a role in the Emergency Response Organization, these compensatory measures will be completed October 20, 1997.
,s GNRO-97/00086 Page 3 of 5 These compensatory measures are considered a short term solution because it places an undue burden on Emergency Response Organization (ERO) personnel by restricting personnel to live within 30 minutes of the plant. It also creates another administrative borden to track and ensure adequate numbers of ERO personnellive within 30 minutes of the plant. We belie.e the long-term solution to be a revision to the Emergency Plan to reflect actual onshift ERO staffing numbers and address the timing issue to alleviate the burden on ERO personnel. In fact, our plan le to revise our current Emergency Plan and submit it 10 the NRC for their review and approval. Our initial belief is that this revised plan should eliminate the major sources of confusion and burden to GGNS by eliminating all 30 minute responder roles. We believe an acceptable plan can be written which has the " critical' tasks performed by onshift personnel or designated as not needed until augmentation staff arrives at a later time. In order to expedite this process, GGNS would like to meet with the NRC to review our anticipated plan change and factor in the staff's feedback.
I In closing, we believe assigning onshift personnel dual functions withcut proper evaluations of potential impact on the Emergency Plan is a separate issue from Emergency Plan Change 28.001-95 which properly evaluated and produced an Emergency Plan Change allowing two protective action HP's being delayed from a 30 to a 60 minute augmentation time. The 10CFR50.54 evaluation for Emergency Plan Change 28.001-95 considered the affect the change would have on the overall ability of the onshift HP's to perform the Table 5-1 functions.
The results of the evaluation indicated that with the HP process improvements, in-plant instruments, and radiation worker improvements, that the 30 minute protective action HP's were not needed until the bulk of the ERO responded at 60 minutes. Onshift HP's do not need additionel assistance at 30 minutes since they are always capable of performing both onshift and 30 minute functions.
Therefore, the dual function HPs were not impacted by the 30 minute delayed response of the two Protective Action HPs. We believe Emergency Plan Change 28.001-95 should stand since the inconsistencies we have identified have no affect on the Protective Action HP's in question. Because we consider this change acceptable, we plan on using the compensatory 30 minute eesponder protective action HP's to alleviate the problems in the area of HP's assigned dual functions.
~
GNRO-97/00086 Page 4 of 5 We would be happy to further discuss these issues upon receipt of this letter.
Please feel free to contact Kenneth Hughey at (601) 437 6470.
We appreciate the cooperation and attention of the Staff on this matter.
Yours truly,
- (
WKH/MJL attachments:
- 1. Table 51 inconsistency Examples
- 3. Comparison of Required Augmentation Numbers Versus-Actual Numbers cc:
(See Next Page).
4
4 GNRO g7/00086 Page 5 of 5 cc:
- GGNS NRC Senior Resident inspector (w/a)
Mr. N. S. Reynolds (w/a)
Mr. L. J. Smith (w/a)
Mr. H. L. Thomas (w/o)
Mr. J. W. Yelverton (w/a)
Mr. E. W. Merschoff (w/a)
Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 Mr. J. N. Donohew, Project Manager (w/2)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 13H3 Washington, D.C. 20555 a
ATTACIIMENT 1 TABLE 5-1 INCONSISTENCY EXAMPLES J
- ta CNRO 97/00086 During th6 detailed review of Table 51 of the Emergency Plan, we did determine that there are some inconsistencies between what Table 51 states and what is implemented in our procedures. These inconsistencies resulted from inappropriately assigning dual functions (onshift and 30 minute responder) to the same individual. We feel that assignment of a few select onshift personnel dual functions is an acceptable practice since these personnel are capable of performing the function, but only if the Emergency Plan is appropriately evaluated and updated to reflect this practice, in the examples that follow, the proposed changes where evaluated, however; the Emergency Plan was not appropriately revised prior to implementing the changes. We further believe that assignment of personnel to dual functions (in certain instances)is acceptable as indicated by Table B 1 In NUREG 0654. The following examples (with explanations) were noted during our Table 51 review:
Example 30 minute Responder Explanation Offsite Dose The Offsite Dose Assessment function has been 1.
Assessment implemented by assigning the function to the onshift Responder chemist. This was considered acceptable since the onshift chemist is trained and capabic of performing this function although Table 5-1 only required this function at 30 minutes. (See Box 9 of Attachment 2) 2.
In plant Survey HP The in plant survey and onsite radiological survey tasks have been implemented by assigning the function to one of the two onshift HPs. This was considered acceptable because in plant surveys are considered a part of HP job coverage. Also, in plant area radiation monitors are installed throughout the plant, thus further minimizing the need for in plant surveys. (See Boxes 11 and 12 of )
3.
One Corenhermal This function was implemented by assigning the function to Hydraulics Plant the Onshift Shift Technical Advisor (STA). This dual System Engineer function was considered acceptable because performing core / thermal hydraulics calculations is a normal part of the STA function. (See Box 15 of Attachment 2) 4.
Two Offsite Monitors The Offsite Monitors who can respond in 30 minutes versus personnel assigned a 30 minute oncall status has never been clearly identified, it is important to note that the Onshift HP providing 24 Hour Coverage for Onsite Surveys has always been able to provide the same monitoring capability as the Offsite Monitors. Performance of onsite surveys is done solely for the purpose of determining if a release is in progress; this is also the function of the offsite monitor. (See Box 10 of Attachment 2)
i ATTACIIMENT 2 GG FSAR TABLE 5-1 l
SHIFT STAFFING AND AUGMENTATION CAPABILITIES as of September 5,1997
-ncmxw:m n=
.g '
Grf !
GG FSAR TABLE 5-1 SHIFT STAFFING AND AUGMENTATION CA.PABILITIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 5.1997
,) -
2
-j Major Position Title On Capatsty for Addites BOX i
NO.
HOW IMPLEMENTED
^ }:
hus Functional Area 0.-ymmy Tasks or Expertrse Location Sinft 30 Min (a) 60 Miri (a) 1
?-
P!ait Operatens and Stuft Supermtendent (SRO)
CR 1
1 One Onsivft Stuft 5%.amem 4 prendes 24 ff.
hour w m v.
' i A x5
..m d of Operational Aspects Stwft Supennsor (SRO)
CR 1(c) 2 One Onstuft Stuft Superwsor provides 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage.
Nuclear Operator A (RO)
CR 2
3 Two Reactor Operators provide 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage.
Auxdiary Oper1 tor CR 2
4 Two Plant Operators provide 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage.
Li.m9m n.y Directen Stwft Supenntendent CR 1(b) 5 SAME AS BOX 1.
and Control On-Can Manager CR/TSC 1
6 One Oncan E,.mwan, D. rector win reheve BOX (En.m wo n.p Drector) 5 person at 60 minutes.
Notifcation/
Offsste Notificates (State. Operator / Plant Systems Two Ons.Nft Radwaste Operatorst RWO)
Commurncation Local, Federad and Engmeer/Engmeermg CR/TSC 1
1 2
7 perform Onstuft and 30 Marte Functions.
maentain commurucations, Techrwenan m
Notification of plant Organ One of the Te o Onstuft RWO f38mg the 30 m eiw6.cy personnel minute Function is rehewed by One 60 trunute TSC Communicator.
Two TSC Commurnestors respond at 60 nwnutes.
Radiological Accident EOF Director OEC EOF 1
8 One EOF Dwector Nsgw 4. at 60 trunutes.
Assessment and
'M of Operaticnal Accident Assessment Offsste Dose Aswn.i.ma Health Physics Supennsor TSC 1
9 SAME AS BOX 13.
Onstwft Chemrst covers 30 menu *e Function untA relieved by any one of the fonnwng three 60 trunute i+. "m..
- 1. Radsatvori Protection Manager
- 2. TT./ EOF Dose Calculator
- 3. TSC&OF Dose Calculator Assrstant i
The Onshift Chemist who was pa"w o-w the BOX 13 Function kwme fulfy ced.cated once
@I l
l
.~
GG FSAR TABLE 5-1 SHIFT STAFFING AND AUGMENTATION CAPABILITIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 5.1997 maior Poemon Time on C,emmyser N BOX NO.
HOW MAPt paaRfTED Funcsonal Aree Emergency Tasks or Eapersee Locueen Shift 30 Min (of 80 Min (el BOX 9 6G rrunute response personnel take over the Offsste Dose Assessment Function.
Offsste Radiologeal Surveys Health Physost/Other as EOF 2
2 10 Two Offste morntors respond in 30 mnutes**.
Designated (d)
Two Offsete monstors respond in 60 mnuses.
Radiological Accadent Onsrte Radiologeal Sunreys Health Physost OSC 1
1 11 One Onstuft HP provides 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage and A m. -.iand (out of plant) covers 30 erunute Function unti relieved by Two Suppo t of 60 trunute responders.
Operational Accu $ent A:sessment in-plant Surveys Health Physost OSC 1
1 1
12 One Onshrft HP provides 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage.
BOX 11 Onshrft HP providing 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage covers 30 nunute Functxvi on a as needed basis only unta reisewed by Two 60 msnute HP j
f responder.
Chemistry / RadeCw..u y' Chemist OSC 1
1 13 One Onshrft Chemist Provides 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage.
One Oncall Chemist responds in 60 mmutes.
Plant System Techrwcad Support Shrft Techrucal Advrsor CR lle) 14 One Onshrft Stwft Technical Advisor provides Engineenng 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage.
Core / Thermal Hydrauhes TSC Coordnator/ Operations TSC/CR 1
15 SAME AS BOX 14.
Coordmator/SRO/STA BOX 14 Onshaft STA yv4.,24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage covers 30 rnmute Function isita One TSC Cuv.J.,.6 relieves STA at 60 Plant System Electncal Plait Systems Engmeer TSC 1
16 One System Engmeer Reports at 60 nunutes.
Engmeenng Mecharucal
.Ple9t Systems Engneer TSC 1
17 One System Engmeer Reports at 60 nunutes.
Page2
GG FSAR TABLE 5-1 SHIFT STAFFING AND AUGMENTATION CAPABILITIES AS OF SEPTBfBER 5.1997 Rempr Poween Ede l
On CapabEky hr N gQX E-HOW BWLEMNTED Funceonel Aree Ernergency Tasks or Emperese i ne=masi Shift 30 Min (al 6 0 Rein (al Repaer and Correctrve Mechanical Maintenance OSC 1(b) 1 18 Two Onshift Mecharscal Mamtenance personnel Actions provide 24 Hour coverage for Onehrft and 60 trunute functions.
Radwaste Operator OSC 1
19 One of BOX 7 Onshift Redweste Operators provide 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage for this Function and fiE this posrtson at 60 minutes. The BOX 7 Onshrft RWO y.v.W.,24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage is relieved of BOX 7 Function by One of the 60 r-unute TSC Communicators responders.
Electrual Marrwenance OSC 1(bl 1
1 20 Two Onstwit sectncal Mantenance Pe sonnes provide coverage betwee i 0700-2300.
One Onshrft Bectncal Mantenance person provides coverage between 2300-0700.
21 Monday - Fnday Two I&C IL1antenance Pe sonnel provide 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage.
Saturday and Sundey One I&C Maintenance person onshrft between 0700-1500- Two I&C Mantenance personnel enshrft the rest of the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> penod (1500-2300 and 23004700.
Protectrve Actions
-Access Control Health Pt,ysicrst 22 Two Onstuft BOX 11 and 12. HPs provide 24 (in-plant) Radiation
-HP coverage for repair, OSC 2(b)
Os 4
hour coverage.
Protectson corrective actions, search and rescuelfirst-aid, and Four HPs respond irt 60 frunutes.
firefghtng
-Personnel rnonitoring
-Dvs..ch r Page 3
GG FSAR TABLE 5-1 SHIFT STAFFING AND AUGMENTATION CAPABILITIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 5,1997 Major Pesition Tsde On Capsmy for Addeons BOX
~
NO.
HOW WFLEMENTED Funceonel Area L.- m y Tasks or E A Locamon Shift 30 Min (a) 6 0 Rein tal Firefightmg Shift Personnel (Operations) 5(b)
Provided by Cleborne 23 Five OnsNft Operators provide 24 covers p.
County / Port Gibson Rescue / First aid
' SNft Persconel fe.,
2(b) 24 Two OnsNft 1&CKlectncal Mantenance Computer Support, personnel, BOX 20 AND 21, provide 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Maintenan:e) coverage.
Security Secunty, firefightmg Secunty Ptirsonnel (See Secunty Plan)
(See Secunty P!an) comr=wt., personnel accountabilsty l
l Notes:
(r.) SNft augmentation begins at the declaration of an Alert, Ste Area 0,wcy, or General C.+ 4.
1 (b) May be provided by SNft Personnel assegned other duties (c) Not required in Mode 4 or 5 per GGNS Tecincal Specifertions.
(d) Must be Offsite Monitoring Team trained.
(e) STA staffing in hwJii.ce with GGNS Techrwcal Specificnion.
l
- Procedures do not clearly identdy who the 30 minute respoh are, although we have personnel who could be at the site in 30 minutes.
l
- Compensatory measures were implemented as of May 22,1997 by placmg two HPs on a 30. ninute oncas status.
@4 L
i c
I ATTACIIMENT 3 Comparison of Required Augmentation Numbers Versus Actual Numbers l
J 1
l n
e a
i g
/
u M
a t
I I
5 I
2 I
I 2
P c
0 A
6 y
s
)
I t
- i n
a
(
5 li o
c b ri n
t i
2 I
2 I
I 2
i a oi 1
s f d M
l p
a d
aT C A
06 T
T l
n F
a i
I F
u M
l I
l 2
2 t
I i
I cA 0
S S
3 N
N U
U ro t
f y
)
r hih 3
a b eo S
y t
nP n 5 i i
R t
d r n
e o/ o l
E s
i 2
I I
2 I
db yb bd M
I s ad imt B
t nG M
T pA 0
ml u
Co a
3 rP U
C C
N L
t I
I F
F FE Y T T Y I
l f
A a
i TT T E FN Es u
h F P b
I O O
I I
)
I I
I t
AVP U
t S
VP I
2 4
I I
W iW 0
I 1
0 I
U I
1 I
I S c
I
(
I I
I 5
S S
S N Ri S LRH T
A n
C O
S S NR NR N
U NP U U
O O O N
S OI S A
S I -
U 5
t
)
)
)
S e
o f
)
i c
)
b e
b 2
2 I
G h
(
b l
I R
b
(
(
(
I I
S I
I 5
a 2(
E T
V S
n
_ R i
C R.
C o
_ E t
R R
R R
R T
G A
I S
S F
F C
C C
_. B a
C T
O O
S S
S c
C C
C C
C R
S R
E E
U U
O
__ M s
t C
T C
_ U
__ N i
u N
O 4
I i-p T
s s
j A
m s
e
)
)
n s
o D
T e
O u
m n
a l
e
)
s o
O R
s u
r 4
i sT a
t s
N i
a
)
S o
uA s
E T
tr O
R s
mq r
(
i t
T u
e s
e R
(
t e
M S
A n
n E
v
%r e
S 3
g i h
o p
e d
=
t d
ir
(
a x
O C
y m
3 G
(
e A
tu E
=
t a.
u u -
s r
n o
(
S m
d i
c i
U o
r o
R t
t t
l taS g
n s
i s
s s
a t
u s
A P
o t
i t
c m ',
v 3
u o
l a m
a s
s c
o a
i c
s
%)
C n
r i
s
- D e
u u
3 T
y y
y y
h n i x
p 0
y l
h l
i h
m r
r c
r g
2 u
u l
r e
o u
os P
u r
r o
a I
f P
S a
a e
h S
S lat T
Cf P
A t
t r
h h
h h
a i
i Cc Cm i
e is.
C I
t l
t t
t h
t h
f c
x i
h nr h
S a h
p h
u u
f f
e f
l U
f a
a a
a h
i i
E c) c c
c Q
S N
A S
S OD S
I C
S O F; O
i d i
i l
f
(
l l
i EC l? n
)
mn
- s. g a o F
e t
t ri n
t a
a ki d
t h O
fc!
lp c
ei g
e a
F.
i n f
i N
lm N. s toe o
ef e O
v r t
ii s
u t f S
k r
o c
s s e ed 3
(
a I. mp s
s rr n T
eh y y
y o a.
A s
t c
y c
a s m
e
- c. k n
P c
s S a u
s t
r
. a u
u iot g M
n lu s
e a
m S
S vs
(
r t
d r
u s
im g
r t
O l
la rhf a
o m iu r
c C
e r
y t
m!
p ic o
/e t o
l t
m p
l a u o
lo v
L. e s o g
s ui i
r l
o y
lo(
n E
p c c a e
c u
J t
S n
f mc o
os i
r gr r i
e n a n ot c
d d
u a
j t
a e
a a
S C. r d l L l
u nmo r
R R
e r
e n n c
l t
t s v a n m
i e a n D
e e
i f
t n
s o m
mla t
a e ch s ;s o
m e
i i
t i
f d p F
s i
lp cP s
c c
c r
T s
r r O
1 n
ae o
e o
fOnf E
0 O
I AI cPD I
C n
l a o
- - s a
m
)
e x
r d
g t
tn a
a A
n u
c lp a
a t
l l
u m
n o
m a
a d
m m
e m
i tsh s
e n
t x
m m
a c
t o
d k
k e
c g
m i
t t
s p -
e n
a cd r
c a
n mt en ef r
E e
n xec s
r e
xoA D
C An p
w t
t F
dt m
/
a c o g
m la t,
O x
l c r f
A Ar n a
)
e P
r u c n s
m u
ts p A.
o e
o i
n o n
v m t
t ul y
h a
o tr t
j G-ie so S
g c
i n o ik a
e t
M r
i t
i d
c t a
e f
tn i,.
ut n
n i
x p
i ei f
a t
d w
p c
wi 1
u o la w
o a s u c
ha 1
AG EC P
I N
RA s A
I R
lllL
COMPARISON OF REQUIRED AUGMENTATION NUMBERS VERSUS ACTUAL NUMBERS l.
Table 51 Tabar 5-1 Table SI Position Title Cepobility for Capability J
On Actual Add h Actual for Actual Additises Major Functisest Ares E-w gTasks or Empertise Lecatsee Shift Os Shift 30 Man (a) 30 Min 60 Mie (a) 60 Mie Radiological Accident Chemistry / RadeChernistry Qiemast USC 1
I 1
1 issessment and Support ofOperational Offsite Dose Asussment
!!calth Physics Supervisor ISC 0
I I
2 j'aident Assessme n Plant System Electrra!
Plant Systems Engmeer TSC 0
I I
Engmeering Mechamcal Plant Sym Engmeer TSC 0
I I
Reparr and Correctne Mechamcal M-~-4 OSC f(b) 2 1
UNSIITrT Actions Radwaste CW USC 2
I UNSIIRT Electncal M-esw 05C I(b) 1**
I UNSiiW1 I
UNSIIET lac Mamtenance OsC 1
ONsinr1 Rescue / First and Shtit Personnel (sc Computer 2(b)
ELEC SulTort. Moe-)
MEGI secunty securny, firefightmg commumcatiors.
Securny Personnel ONSIHFT (See Secunty personnel w J.Nirty Plan) lOTALS 10 18 II 6
16 22 24 TOTAL AT30 MINUTES 46+ TOTAL AT 68 MINLTI5 Notes:(a) Shift augmerr.ation begins at the declaration of an Alert. Site Area Emergency.or General Emergency (b) May be provided by Shift Personnel assigned other duties. (c) Not reqmred in Mode 4 or 5 per GGNS Tecimical Specificaties. (d) Must be OfTsite Monitoring Team tramed(c) STA stafTmg in accordance with GGN3 Techmcal Specificauon.
- Except Saturday and Sunday betacen 1500-0700 and Monday thru Friday when number is two.
- Ik* ween 0700-2300 number is two.
Page 2
.