ML20216C932

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Concurs in Chairman Jackson Comments Re Hiring Experts for Plant Life Extension Cases
ML20216C932
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/30/1998
From: Diaz N
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Cotter B
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 9805190446
Download: ML20216C932 (1)


Text

9 ET E $ IE 3 I B M 7 M _ J /2 3 / &

l UNITED STATES

[(-

o,,

, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION COMSECY-98-010 2

g t

j ATOMIC. SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD PANEL

,e, 2

WASHINGTON D.C.20555-0001 April 7,1998 I concur in the Chairman's comments, eecee ener3eo gg]gggp MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Jackson e

l O

FROM:

B. Paul Cotter, Jr.

g/jjjgg pgg e

Chief Administrative Judge d8iG iritiale o

e

SUBJECT:

EXPERTS NEEDED FOR PLANT LIFE EXTEN'S'l N C'ASk$* * * * * * * * * * * *

  • Pursuant to our April 3,1998 discussion, I asked three technical members of the Panel, Judges Kline, Kelber and Murphy, to consider whether the ASLBP needs additional expert members to adjudicate the technical issues that could arise in the upcoming plant life extension cases.

They concluded that:

1.

The existing membens of either the full-time or part-time groups have sufficient expertise to resolve the majority of potential issues; 2.

Resolution of one class of issues, those related to material aging, such as polymers, and corrosion, could benefit from assistance in such disciplines as materials science or materials engineering; and 3.

A materials scientist would be of important assistance in the forthcoming high-level waste (HLW) case because of the recent developing interest in the long term integrity of waste packages under corrosive conditions.

In reaching their conclusions, the judges consulted all of the full-time technical members, reviewed the expertise available from the full-time and part-time rosters, reviewed issues in the Diablo Canyon license recapture case, and reviewed applicable portions of the regulations goveming plant life extension.

All of the technical members believe that our existing capabilities are adequate to handle plant life extension cases because of their similarity to reactor licensing cases. However, none disagreed that a materials scientist could be useful in these cases and would be helpful in the HLW case. The expertise currently available from full-time panel members is probably adequate to adjudicate license extension cases, but the absence of any one of several members would lead to a serious gap. Broad scale engineering expertise resides as well within several part-time members.'

\\),

'In addition, there are individuals on our Register of candidates qualified for appointment l

to the Panel with chemical engineering expertise which might include corrosion chemistry and g'

engineering.

\\b

~

9805190446 980430 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR