ML20216C302
| ML20216C302 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 08/29/1997 |
| From: | Desmond N BOSTON EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| BECO-#2.97.087, NUDOCS 9709090015 | |
| Download: ML20216C302 (3) | |
Text
-
i*=
- _le, O
==
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Rocky Hll Road Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360-5599 Nancy L. Desmond August 29, 1997 Regulatory Relation; Gmup Manacer BECo Ltr. #2.97487 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission E
Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
~
Docket No. 50-293 License No. DPR 35
- Submittal of Fitness cor Duty Proc sty Performance Data for Pilorim Nuclear Power Station Tha enclosed Fitness-For Duty Program performance data sheets are submitted in accordance y
with 10CFR26.71(d). This submittal cont #ns data for the period January 1,1997 through June
?-
30,19G7.
Please contact me if you have any questions of comments regarding the enclosed submittal.
M71M Nancy L. Desmond RAH \\dme\\ffddata Attachment cc:
Mr. Alan B. Wang, Project Manager f'M'
(
Project Directorate 1-3 4
J
. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 4
Mail Stop! OWF 1482 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 White Flint North
-11555 Rockville Pike i
Rockville, MD 20852 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I
Region 1 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA <9406 Senior Resident inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
^'970989N 15 970829
^
ll l
,.l.l PDR ADOCK 05000293 R
p
& Boston Edison
\\
Fitness For Duty Perforrnance Data Summary ofAfanagement Actions 3
Six Month Period Ending June 30,1997 We conducted 1,333 tests on contractor personnel during this period. The increase in the 7
number of tests conducted was due to the outage testing at the beginning of the year.
q Thirty-one of these tests were positive. Twenty nine were Preaccess tests, one was a For 5
Cause and one was a Random test. Two contractors were positive for two substances
}
(marijuana and cocaine) and one contractor was positive for three subs;ances (Marijuana, cocaine, and alcohol).
Licensee employees had two Random positives, one for cocaine and one for marijuana.
One licensee employee was tested For Cause and found to be negative. Two contractor
.\\
personnel were tested For Cause. One was positive and the other one was negative.
This past year the company decided to test at the 50 nanodram level for marijuana. We found that out of twenty marijuana positives, twelve were positive at the 50 nanogram
'evel and eight were positive at the 100 nanogram level. Our licensed employee who was positive for marijuana was at the 50 nanogram level.
Integrity checks revealed that there were twenty-one specimens having creatinine levels of less than 200 nanograms per liter. Eighteen tests were repeated. One of the repeated tests was positive for cocaine and one o these was still low and had to be tested as an observed r
specimen.
We have instituted a new computer generated report for tracking testing results. This allows the computer to report our results from the d tn the.t is put in the computer on a daily (aabasts7. The total for the confirmed positive tests results reflects the number of subs
.e busejh nprthe number of people tested.
l
//h N f W aul A. K cfe, M. D.
Medical Revieiv Off.r LLH 7/30/97 i--um u
E '
'e PERSONNEL SUBJECT TO 10CFR26 8/26/97 Date Criteria: From: 01/01/97 To: 06/30/97 e
l Boston Edison Company l
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Cont::et Name Dr. Paul Keefe Phone (include area code)
(617) 424 2372 l
BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES MirijdeTe-Marijiians~ 1 CJcaine Op~Intes lin'ph~eisinines Phencyclidne
'AlcohoI~
Refinal-Song /mi
{100ng/mi l 300ng/mi f00nge.nl (1000ng/mi
- 26ng/mi l
to Test UEe~nsee 6
y e
6 o-g pmployees fl fl j
j i
j i
contr ctors f2 8
'e 6
I l
7l 6 ~~~7]
l f
l l
1
@ho' 13 8
n 0
0 0
7.
{bstances l
l j
l
_j j
fl 37,J yesting Results l
Licensee Employees l. Contractor Personnel j
{
AieTaie Niiihber wi~th-~'
734,~40 712.73 I
~
Unescorted Access ategories l
$_estedj Positive l fested } ' Positive
~
fri ccess l
l 84 l 0, l 10M {
25
@Cause l
l 1 0, L il 1] handom } l 287, l 2;( 286ll lj Follow Up/ ther l l 6l 0l 21] l 0, i otal l [ 380 L 2! 1333 l 3T T PERCENT OF TOTAL WORKFORCE RANDOMLY TESTED DURING THIS PERIOD 39,60 % = PERCENT OF POSITIVES FOR TOTAL WORKFORCE DURING THIS PERIOD 1.93 % = 1}}