ML20216A951
| ML20216A951 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/19/1998 |
| From: | Shirley Ann Jackson, The Chairman NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Hoyle J NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20216A925 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-63FR26955 AF32-2-025, AF32-2-24, AF32-2-25, SECY-98-024-C, SECY-98-24-C, NUDOCS 9804130333 | |
| Download: ML20216A951 (2) | |
Text
,s
~
i
' l; A F F l R M A T I O N VOTE
~
RESPONSE SHEET TO: John C. Hoyle, Secretary FROM: CHAIRMAN JACKSON ,
SUBJECT:
SECY-98-024 - FINAL AMENDMENTS TO 10 CFR PARTS 60, 72,73,74, AND 75," PHYSICAL PROTECTION FOR SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AND HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE" Approved X Disapproved Abstain Not Participating Request Discussion )
COMMENTS:
See attached comments.
J4 A )+
Shirley Ann Jackson SIGNATURE l
l Release Vote / X / March 19, 1998 DATE i
Withhold Vote / /
Entered on "AS" Yes X No
- B8"!8aai !88
[$ CORRESPONDENCE PDR l
2 Chairman Jackson SECY-98-024 Vote Comment:
I approve of the rulemaking that clarifies and makes consistent the physical protection l requirements for independent storage of spent nuclear fuel including the performance-based capabilities provided in 73.51(b)(2) of the proposed rule.
- I am concerned that the prescriptive language of 73.51(d) obviates the performance- j based language of 73.51(b)(2), and would require a number of exemptions for site- q specific ISFSI licensees. Therefore, the staff should either
- )
(1) delete the requirements of 73.51(d), stating in the Statements of Consideration for i the rule that the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-1619) contains an acceptable approach; or, (2) add language to the rule (similar to that provided in 10 CFR 61.58),-
which provides for the staff to accept an alternative approach to the physical protection l requirements.
I I
i l
l-L
-